Author Topic: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family  (Read 72375 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Prof. John Turley foreign agent charges
« Reply #700 on: October 13, 2023, 09:09:34 AM »
against Menendez but not Hunter
another example of the political weaponization of the rule of law invalidating the LEFTist cry "no one is above the law":

https://nypost.com/2023/10/13/bob-menendez-charged-as-a-foreign-agent-but-not-hunter-biden/

I was only thinking prior to the election thinking Joe would not want to chance the risk he would lose, but you are probably right.  He could do a month after the election (assuming it will take that long to count the late mail in ballots (  :roll: ) and prior to his leaving office.

So, I think CD is right - after the election .
« Last Edit: December 09, 2023, 07:38:02 AM by ccp »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #702 on: October 14, 2023, 02:45:03 PM »
Very interesting!



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Magoo pain 2.7 mill for beachhouse
« Reply #705 on: October 21, 2023, 08:20:38 AM »


So what?

Raskin replies on MSLSD, MSDNC, MSPCP:

"Where's the proof?"

There is "no proof!"

Weismann comes on to repeat:

"There is no there there" then proceeds to discuss Trump "crimes"

Nicolle Wallace grins.



Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Just a Chinese Payoff Coincidence
« Reply #707 on: October 21, 2023, 04:02:13 PM »
Joe buys the beach house where he spends a great deal of time as his handlers let him pretend to be President for cash soon after Hunter closes a $10 million/year deal with China. Funny how American media never details stuff like this:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12649277/Joe-Biden-paid-nearly-2-75million-CASH-Rehoboth-Beach-house-weeks-Hunter-sending-threatening-text-Chinese-business-partner-demanding-close-10million-deal.html

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Biden Crime Family, No evidence? Or mountains of it?
« Reply #708 on: October 26, 2023, 08:30:52 AM »
https://www.dailywire.com/news/fbi-received-criminal-information-from-40-confidential-sources-on-the-biden-family-u-s-senator

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has reportedly obtained information indicating that more than 40 confidential human sources have provided information to federal law enforcement about “criminal” activity involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and his brother James.
-----------------------------
(Doug)  40 Criminal referrals?!  And nothing happened?!

Strange that they think Trump is the guy in legal jeopardy.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Good, up to date summary, what we know so far about the Biden Crime Family
« Reply #710 on: October 29, 2023, 12:34:25 PM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/10/29/what_must_the_president_have_known_149980.html

Given all this, what does it say about the guy if you believe he didn't know what was going on?

And that was before all the cognitive deterioration.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Re: FBI, DOJ, & Biden and Company: Investigate & Indict ‘em All
« Reply #712 on: October 31, 2023, 07:31:30 AM »
Every time I read yet another piece about the abject inequity embraced when investigating Biden as opposed to Trump I become furious all over again:

https://nypost.com/2023/10/29/opinion/anatomy-of-a-biden-family-coverup-executed-by-our-own-fbi-and-doj/?utm_source=facebook_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons&fbclid=IwAR32u1zDWVorNmzVSu1JD_6ZzpPvq1SZS_5ChFElTlRPuZy5J60At4zMG9c

What's most strange is that it's not even subtle.

Much as I don't like Dean Phillips, he's part of the political and policy deception but not part of the corruption.  Everybody tell your Dem friends to vote for someone else.  Anyone else.

Now this, 82,000 pseudonym email pages of Biden Crime Family corruption, to and from a guy who had "no idea", "no knowledge", "no contact", "no dealings", "never even asked his son about his business".  What kind of mindless, gullible voter believes that?

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/step-aside-hillary-joe-biden-may-become-king-email-scandals-new


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
WSJ
« Reply #714 on: October 31, 2023, 10:09:14 AM »
second

More on the Stifled Hunter Biden Probe
A U.S. Attorney says his team was blocked from its vetting work.
By The Editorial Board
Oct. 30, 2023 6:16 pm ET

House Republicans continue to unpack the Justice Department’s botched Hunter Biden probe, and evidence is mounting of interference from the top. The latest testimony comes from an Oct. 23 Judiciary Committee interview with former U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

In January 2020, then Attorney General Bill Barr tapped Mr. Brady to vet information related to Ukrainian corruption, and to pass along credible material to offices with ongoing investigations. That included Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who for five years has been probing Hunter’s foreign business operations, including his work for the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma. Mr. Brady says in the transcript we’ve reviewed that FBI headquarters and Mr. Weiss’s office made this very difficult.


Mr. Brady and four assistant U.S. attorneys worked to check the allegations they received against government records and open-source documents. His team lacked grand-jury authority to compel interviews or subpoena records, so it worked with the FBI to run names, bank accounts, emails and the like. Yet Mr. Brady said he came to understand that his main contact—the FBI office in Pittsburgh—couldn’t take “any steps” without “the review and the approval of FBI Headquarters, not just the leadership of FBI Pittsburgh.”

Mr. Brady describes a “reluctance on the part of the FBI to really do any tasking” related to “allegations of Ukrainian corruption broadly and then specifically anything that intersected with Hunter Biden and his role in Burisma.” He says “FBI Headquarters had to sign off on every assignment, no matter how small or routine,” and that this sometimes required “17 different people,” mostly at the headquarters level.

Local agents had to “go pens down sometimes for 2 or 3 weeks at a time before they could re-engage,” he says. He’d “never in [his DOJ] career” seen anything like it, and on a “fairly regular” basis had to go to the deputy AG’s office for help.

Mr. Brady says his office was informed by “members of the Pittsburgh FBI team” that they had been instructed by headquarters not to “affirmatively share information” with the Brady team. He says he was “surprised” to learn from public reporting in October 2020 that the FBI had possessed Hunter’s laptop since 2019, since his team had asked the FBI for anything it had on Hunter and Burisma, and the laptop would have been “helpful.” No kidding.

Mr. Brady says officials in Mr. Weiss’s office broadcast “a skepticism of the information that we were developing . . . and then weariness of that information.” Mr. Brady had to call in the deputy AG and Mr. Weiss. “At one point, the communication between our offices was so constricted that we had to provide written questions to the investigative team in Delaware” and receive “written answers back,” he says.

Mr. Brady’s interview also sets the record straight on the now infamous FBI 1023 form, in which a confidential informant claimed a Burisma executive told him of a bribery scheme involving Vice President Joe Biden and Hunter. House Judiciary ranking Democrat Jamie Raskin in June said the FBI had briefed Congress that Mr. Brady had “signed off on closing the assessment” of the 1023, “having found no evidence to corroborate” its contents.

Mr. Brady says that isn’t true. He says his team was “able to corroborate certain information that was represented by” the informant, and that there “were sufficient indicia of credibility in this 1023 to pass it on” to the Weiss team. This doesn’t mean the 1023 claims are true, but it does raise questions about what the Weiss team has done to investigate them.

The Brady transcript reinforces the claims of two Internal Revenue Service whistleblowers who say that they were also blocked from fully investigating the Hunter case. Attorney General Merrick Garland insists the Hunter case is being run by the book, but whose book?


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #716 on: November 02, 2023, 05:56:18 AM »
outrageous - yes.

" The quid pro quo allegations spread like Ebola and the Democrats are now moving forward with their three-year-long project"

love the analogy but am thinking spread like a "Chinese spyware virus" might be more apropo


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Re: $40k is 10% of $400k
« Reply #718 on: November 02, 2023, 08:25:57 PM »
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/chinese-funds-moved-through-biden-family-accounts-to-joe-biden-bank-records-and-documents-suggest-5521244?utm_source=News&src_src=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2023-11-02-2&src_cmp=breaking-2023-11-02-2&utm_medium=email&est=W2Hh2msj6g4Ij6uw9O05RfeAMV6PbIW8r0dr49AGafrkcBYMSTyjv6%2FbxkyPnMoyuQP%2F

I heard Rep James Comer on the radio today, he sees it exactly the way you say.  The money comes directly from the Chinese client broken into pieces, moved through brief stops only to "launder" it and exactly 10% goes through to the Big Guy just like the emails say.

It took them this long to get to James Biden’s Bank account and they still don't access to Joe's.

Under the law, the favor or benefit only has to go through to family. The direct tie to Joe is just icing on the cake.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2023, 09:41:36 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Moving the biden corruption goal posts
« Reply #719 on: November 03, 2023, 09:54:08 AM »
(Doug) Haven't the investigators already scored a touchdown, a knockout punch, a grand slam home run?
---------------------
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/moving-the-goal-posts-on-the-hunter-biden-investigation/ar-AA1jilWe?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=4186a0f2c5e04ee2aea630161c2dfc32&ei=66

Kim Strassel, WSJ

Moving the Goal Posts on the Hunter Biden Investigation
© Provided by The Wall Street Journal

The speed at which the White House and press corps are moving the goal posts for what counts as shameful Biden family business is remarkable, though it doesn’t change the facts. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer’s release of evidence of family payments to Joe Biden are a problem for the White House, no matter the spin.

Mr. Comer has produced images of two checks made out to Joe Biden, both drawn from an account held by his brother James and sister-in-law Sara. Both entangle Joe in his family’s sordid financial dealings and undercut his claims that he knew nothing. It’s a far cry from Candidate Biden’s claim in 2019 that there was an “absolute wall” between himself and the Biden family business.
The committee’s account is as follows: The first check to Joe was written on Sept. 3, 2017, although the money trail begins earlier with his son Hunter. In the first half of 2017, Hunter and business associates negotiated a joint company with CEFC, a Shanghai-based energy company linked to the Chinese government. One email from a Hunter associate that discussed equity stakes suggested 10% of the joint venture be held by Hunter for “the big guy.”

CEFC was asked to commit $10 million in capital. When the money didn’t come, a frustrated Hunter sent a July 30, 2017, WhatsApp message to Raymond Zhao, a CEFC associate. It said he was sitting with his dad, demanded payment and warned: “I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.”

A week later, a Chinese company affiliated with CEFC sent $5 million to a joint venture between Hunter and a CEFC associate. The same day, that joint venture sent $400,000 to an entity controlled by Hunter. Less than a week later, Hunter wired $150,000 from his entity to a company owned by James and Sara Biden. On Aug. 28, 2017, Sara withdrew $50,000 from said company. The same day, she deposited it into a personal bank account that belonged to her and her husband. Prior to this deposit, the balance on that personal account was $46.88. On Sept. 3, she cut a $40,000 check from that account to Joe Biden. Graduates of elementary-school math will note that $40,000 is 10% of $400,000.

The second check to Joe Biden was written on March 1, 2018, again from James and Sara. In 2018 James convinced a hospital operator, Americore Health, to lend him $600,000, which according to a later corporate bankruptcy filing was “based upon representations that his last name, ‘Biden,’ could ‘open doors’ and that he could obtain a large investment from the Middle East based on his political connections.” On March 1, 2018, Americore wired $200,000 to James and Sara Biden’s personal account. That same day, James wrote the $200,000 check to Joe.

House Democrats have a ready answer for all this, with records showing an attorney trust account maintained by Joe’s attorneys wired $40,000 to James and Sara in July 2017 and $200,000 to the couple in January 2018. The transfers, the Democratic lawmakers say, were “short-term loans,” and James and Sara’s checks back to Joe were simply repayments and in fact read “loan repayment” on the memo lines. The White House adds that the loans were made when Joe was out of office, and asserts that because the checks merely repay Joe “his own money,” there is no bribery or financial gain.

Maybe, maybe not. Mr. Comer’s committee has asked the White House for records related to the loan—purpose, interest, repayment plan? So far, none have come. The committee is also still receiving records from its subpoenas for certain Hunter and James accounts.

The bigger point is that this destroys the president’s longtime claim that he was walled off from the family business. Even if James’s $40,000 check to Joe was a repayment, that transfer was underwritten by Hunter’s Chinese dealings. It was Hunter’s “work”—taking advantage of his dad’s name—that enabled Joe to be “repaid.”

Similarly, it’s highly likely that Joe’s “loans” were enabling James to engage in business deals. Hunter’s and James’s shenanigans were a headache even when Joe was vice president. Does the White House really expect Americans to believe that Joe didn’t ask for any information as to his brother’s request of nearly a quarter-million dollars, or naive enough to think that float wasn’t in aid of the Biden family cash register?

As House Republicans have dug in, Team Biden’s explanations have shifted. First, Joe had “never spoken” to Hunter about business. Then, the president was “not in business” with his son. Now, as per ranking Oversight Democrat Jamie Raskin, Joe “did not profit from his family members’ business ventures.” The goal posts are now on another field altogether. Yet the evidence—ranging from proof that Joe was on Hunter’s business calls to these latest checks—is that Joe knew about the family cash-in on his name and lent both his presence and his money to that cause.

That’s the line any Republican opponent will go with in the 2024 presidential race, and Democrats had best be honest about Joe’s liabilities.

Write to kim@wsj.com.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2023, 09:56:31 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Hunter Biden "Loans"
« Reply #722 on: November 20, 2023, 01:21:31 PM »
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/hldhunter-kept-afloat-millions-fathers-democrat-donors-after

$5 million in "Loans" (from a big donor of his father) makes sense because, umm, an unemployed drug addict might hit the jackpot in the lottery?

Imagine if the Trump or DeSantis family was caught up in this.

If it was a gift, it would be taxable.  The federal tax alone on $5 million is 40%.  That's a lot of prosecutable tax evasion.
https://smartasset.com/estate-planning/gift-tax-explained-2021-exemption-and-rates

Of course it's a gift and the phony loan documents are evidence.

Unless you happen to be a prominent Democrat. Then you may have the HRC defense available.  What difference - at this point - does it make?
« Last Edit: November 20, 2023, 02:40:07 PM by DougMacG »


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Turley: Hunter to face Congressional questions
« Reply #724 on: November 29, 2023, 06:07:50 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Re: Turley: Hunter to face Congressional questions
« Reply #725 on: November 29, 2023, 06:36:07 AM »
https://nypost.com/2023/11/29/opinion/hunter-biden-finally-going-to-face-hard-questions-from-those-who-wont-ask-nicely/

Me : suggest first question :

Who is the "big guy"

Is it sugar daddy Joe?

Second question, put one of his paintings up on the jumbotron and ask, how much is this worth?
Remember you are under oath.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #726 on: November 29, 2023, 10:21:46 AM »
Second question, put one of his paintings up on the jumbotron and ask, how much is this worth?
Remember you are under oath.

Shyster response:

"beauty is in the eye of the beholder"

 :wink:

honest response -  $100 but for the frame

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
Joe's email aliases
« Reply #727 on: November 29, 2023, 01:46:12 PM »
National Archives clings to Biden's email aliases: It's strange, isn't it, how the National Archives was so eager to rat out Donald Trump for his failure to return some of his White House documents and yet has been so tenacious in its defense of Joe Biden for his use of multiple fake email addresses to conceal his affairs and to thereby evade congressional oversight while serving as Barack Obama's vice president. Why, it's almost as if the archivist had a political agenda. As The Daily Signal reports, "Getting to the truth of Joe Biden's use of multiple alias email accounts while he was vice president could take years if Congress waits on the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration to release all of the relevant records it is requesting." But there's hope for getting to the bottom of Biden's surreptitious emails and thereby the secret lives of Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware. As the Signal continues, a narrowly targeted Freedom of Information Act request shows that the National Archives has "731 documents relevant to the creation of these alias email accounts and potentially who authorized their use." This would greatly streamline the congressional investigation by narrowing the focus to a small tranche of emails rather than painstakingly poring over all 82,000 of them. Now if we can only get the Archives to cough them up, and preferably prior to next year's election.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
WSJ: Hunter's missing services
« Reply #729 on: December 01, 2023, 10:37:36 AM »
Hunter Biden’s Missing ‘Services’
A bank examiner raised concerns about the president’s son’s account in 2018.
Kimberley A. Strassel
By
Kimberley A. Strassel
Follow
Nov. 30, 2023 6:14 pm ET


One of the oldest games in Washington is setting the bar, and this week Rep. Jamie Raskin played it like a pro. Mr. Raskin, ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, gloated that Republicans are failing miserably to demonstrate a “vast unproven family conspiracy” in their investigation of Joe Biden and his kin.


This is called raising expectations, and Mr. Raskin is betting that GOP efforts to get to the bottom of the Biden family business will leave the impression of being mired in the fever swamps. But the questions at play are neither vast nor at this point entirely unproven. They are simple: Did Biden family members cash in solely on the basis of Joe Biden’s political name, and did Joe in any way benefit?

A red-flag document released this week from Oversight Chairman James Comer provides more evidence on the cashing-in point—and it comes from an impartial source. The document is a June 2018 email from an internal bank investigator—someone trained to look for money laundering—that flags suspicious activity within a Hunter Biden joint venture’s account. In his email to an executive at the bank, the investigator says he’s been monitoring Hunter given his designation as a PEP—an acronym for “politically exposed person,” a class of client that poses a risk of bribery or corruption. The investigator then explains “account activity” and “negative news” indicate Hunter to be “high risk.”

The investigator was specifically concerned with the description of a $5 million deposit in August 2017 from Northern International Capital Holdings, a company affiliated with Chinese-government-linked energy firm CEFC. The investigator notes the money was listed as a “business loan,” yet “there was no loan agreement document submitted.”

Instead, the email says, the money had to that date funded 16 wire transfers totaling more than $2.9 million, a portion of which went to an entity controlled by Hunter. “These payments were indicated as management fees and reimbursements,” the email says, noting that “we find it unusual that approximately 58% of the funds were transferred to the law firm in a few months and the frequency of payments appear erratic.” Especially because the joint venture that initially received the so-called loan “does not currently have any investment projects at this time.” The investigator queried why anyone was getting paid “millions in fees” when “it does not appear” there were “services rendered.”

Exactly. A federal investigation and Internal Revenue Service whistleblowers have forced some coverage of whether Hunter paid appropriate taxes on his overseas earnings. Yet Oversight Committee investigators are probing the actual transactions, asking what Hunter did exactly to earn the payouts. The bank investigator was concerned that the Chinese money flowing into Hunter’s account was unrelated to actual business and suggested the bank re-evaluate its “relationship with the customer.” The email cites media reporting that Hunter’s “extravagant spending” might have “put his family in a deep financial hole,” and that there are reports of “China targeting children of politicians and purchase of political influence through ‘sweetheart deals.’ ” This email was written years before Hunter’s laptop went public and he became the target of a congressional investigation.

But the laptop and investigations only added to the concerns outlined in the bank email. What exactly did Hunter provide Ukrainian energy company Burisma in return for a significant monthly payment? Devon Archer, Hunter’s former business partner, told GOP investigators that Hunter’s value-add was “the brand”—Joe Biden’s name—and that “Burisma would have gone out of business if it didn’t have the brand attached to it.” In an email to Mr. Archer in 2011, addressing some of his fledgling dealings with Chinese investors, Hunter admitted: “It has nothing to do with me and everything to do with my last name.”

Bank records obtained by the House Oversight Committee, meanwhile, show that at least $40,000 of that $5 million quickly ended up in a Joe Biden bank account—via his brother James, who recorded it as repayment of a loan. Democrats and media allies are pressing the point that it was a loan, obfuscating the larger picture, which is damning. The evidence all points to Joe being well aware of Hunter’s business forays—getting on the phone with Hunter during his son’s business meetings, entertaining prospective Hunter business clients, allowing his son to tag along on Air Force Two for business meetings. Hunter and James had also been in business together.

That put an obligation on Joe Biden—as a senator, vice president and a potential presidential candidate—to keep his finances completely separate. He might not have proved able to stop his son or brother from cashing in on the family name, and he might never have taken an “official act” on Hunter’s behalf. But he did aid Hunter in his brand selling, and money from that selling ended up in his account.

That information is highly relevant to voters, and why the GOP probe is a public service. Even if the Biden family business doesn’t prove to be some vast conspiracy, it is certainly a sordid affair.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ: Hunter's missing services
« Reply #730 on: December 01, 2023, 11:34:37 AM »
” The investigator queried why anyone was getting paid “millions in fees” when “it does not appear” there were “services rendered.”


  - And the defense for that would be detailed records with staff names and hours and expenses associated with specific projects, are there aren't. If your law firmed billed you $2.9 million in this case, what documentation of work done would you expect with that bill?

Absent that, in this situation, it is presumed corruption and influence for sale.

BTW, we're the asking prices for Hunters paintings accurate fair market value, not overvalued?  Isn't that exactly the case going on in NY with the Trump family business.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Hunter's fake offer to testify
« Reply #731 on: December 02, 2023, 10:29:56 PM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/12/01/the_biden_family_grift_and_hunters_fake_offer_to_testify_150133.html

  *. Buyer beware.  Crafty had a problem with a previous
realclearpolitics.com link.
I find it to be a very reputable site. .
A bit long to post the whole thing.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #733 on: December 04, 2023, 11:05:21 AM »
" in 2018, after Joe Biden had left the vice presidency and before he had launched his presidential campaign, he took in three payments of $1,380 each"

OK this is a start -> now  dig deeper

I can imagine the libs rolling their eyes over $4 K

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Impeachment Inquiry Biden
« Reply #734 on: December 05, 2023, 05:21:38 AM »
It's hard for me to believe we don't have enough evidence right now to know: these are very large amounts of money received by selling influence and Joe was central to it, cooperating and benefiting.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-hunter-biden-saga-continues-impeachment-inquiry-politics-c38ccce8

The Hunter Biden Saga Continues
The House will vote on whether to open an impeachment inquiry into the president.

House Republicans just took two big steps toward impeaching President Biden.

The first came on Saturday, when Speaker Mike Johnson said he has the votes to approve a impeachment inquiry into the president, which would make official then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s declaration of one back in September. The second came Monday, when Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer made public a subpoenaed bank record showing that Joe Biden received in 2018 at least three direct monthly payments of $1,380 from Hunter Biden’s firm, Owasco PC. This comes on the heels of last week’s news that a bank investigator raised red flags in June 2018 about what Oversight says was “money from China that ultimately funded the $40,000 check” to Joe Biden from his sister-in-law.

Ever since the public learned of Hunter Biden’s influence peddling abroad, his father’s defenders have insisted there’s no there there. In 2019, when Joe Biden was running for his party’s nomination for president, he put it this way during a campaign stop in South Carolina:

“There will be an absolute wall between the personal and private, and the government. There wasn’t any hint of scandal at all when we were there, and I will impose the same kind of strict, strict rules. That’s why I never talk with my son or my brother or anyone else in the distant family about their business interests, period.”

Mr. Biden was equally categorical during the 2020 debates with Donald Trump. He dismissed Hunter’s laptop as Russian disinformation, citing a statement by 51 intelligence experts ginned up by then-campaign aide and now Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

In the two debates, when Mr. Trump brought up Hunter’s sleazy overseas business dealings, Mr. Biden responded that it wasn’t true, or that Mr. Trump’s assertion had been discredited.

At one point Mr. Trump brought up payments from China. Mr. Biden said, “My son has not made money in terms of this thing about, what are you talking about, China.” But in federal court in July, Hunter Biden himself refuted his father’s claim. He admitted to Judge Maryellen Noreika that he received $664,000 from CEFC, a Chinese company with connections to the Communist Party.

The president and his defenders continue to insist there is no evidence of wrongdoing. But while there may not be absolute proof, there is plenty of evidence—and it’s growing.

After Mr. Comer’s news of the monthly payments broke, the Washington Post reported that they were for a Ford Raptor truck owned by Joe Biden and used by Hunter. Asked if this was true, a Comer spokesperson says: “Unclear but doesn’t matter from our perspective. There is now a pattern of members of the Biden family using their bank accounts that have been funded by Chinese and other foreign entities to send money to Joe Biden.” And it raises a question: Why was Hunter paying his father out of his company bank account?
« Last Edit: December 05, 2023, 05:34:57 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #735 on: December 05, 2023, 10:01:34 AM »
The three monthly payments apparently began immediately after Trump took office i.e. during the interregnum when Biden was out of office.  Honest people would draw the logical inference from the timing, but we are not dealing with honest people here; so Clintonesque evasions are the order of the day.

Frankly, IMHO the we/the Reps have been drawn to the shiny object of Biden's treasonous corruption.  Rightly so! 

This however leaves us with two problems.

1) the legal-political gamesmanship based around "Well, you haven't proven it to a legal certainty/conviction"; and

2) Kommiela Harris.

IMHO it would be far , , , ahem , , , craftier to go after BOTH of them for violation of Article Four, Section Four of our C.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Hunters "sugar daddy"
« Reply #736 on: December 06, 2023, 08:52:48 AM »
From Red State via Bongino report:

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2023/12/06/hunter-biden-received-49-from-sugar-brother-hollywood-lawyer-who-paid-his-taxes-bought-his-art-n2167225

trying to figure this out:
Joe is Hunter's daddy
but Morris is Hunter's "sugar daddy"
and Hunter is Joe's "sugar daddy" 

and who is Morris' sugar daddy or is he just a wealthy partisan?
what is in it for him?

 :-o

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #737 on: December 06, 2023, 09:00:00 AM »
PS trying to find Yiddish to fit the Biden corruption
but not finding exact word


closest I can come up with is *finagle*.

a family and friends are finaglers.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Joe Biden’s Assist to Hunter’s Business
« Reply #738 on: December 06, 2023, 04:33:39 PM »
House investigators keep digging into the Biden family business, and this week comes new evidence of the ways Joe Biden helped his son using alias email accounts.

Internal Revenue Service agents Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler provided to the House Ways and Means Committee more information from their multiyear investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes and business.
 
The documents include an 11-page log showing a list of 327 emails that Joe Biden sent or received from 2010 to 2019 under pseudonyms that included “robinware456” and “robert.l.peters.” Mr. Biden was a big user of these shadow accounts, with the National Archives and Records Administration disclosing that it has up to 82,000 pages of emails and documents sent or received under Biden aliases while he was Vice President.

The 327 emails listed in the log are exchanges between Joe Biden and Hunter or Eric Schwerin, a former Hunter business partner who handled Biden family finances. The committee says 54 of the exchanges are between Joe Biden and Mr. Schwerin.

Five emails were exchanged within five days of Mr. Biden’s June 2014 trip to Ukraine, while another 27 were exchanged prior to his return trip to Ukraine in November 2014. Those trips coincided with Hunter’s lucrative board position at Ukrainian energy firm Burisma.
The trips preceded then Vice President’s Biden’s 2015 role in forcing the ouster of a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma and its CEO, Nikolai Zlochevsky, for corruption. Another 38 emails originated from within the White House and were sent to Joe Biden aliases, with Hunter Biden copied.

The committee doesn’t know the contents of the emails, but further evidence provided to Congress raises questions about Hunter’s role at Burisma, the political access he was peddling, and Joe Biden’s knowledge of that work. Hunter’s former partner, Devon Archer, previously told Congress that “Burisma would have gone out of business if it didn’t have the [Biden] brand attached to it.”

Ways and Means also received new emails from Mr. Ziegler that are revealing about what Burisma wanted from Hunter. One email is from Vadym Pozharsky, an adviser to Burisma, to Hunter in April 2015. The Ukrainian thanked Hunter for “the opportunity to meet your father and spent (sp) some time together.”

Another Pozharsky email to Hunter (which copies Mr. Schwerin) in November 2015 asks Hunter for thoughts on a proposal for a contract for a U.S. lobbying firm, Blue Star Strategies. Mr. Pozharsky worries about the lack of “concrete, tangible results” listed in the proposal, including how the firm will improve Mr. Zlochevky’s “case.”

Mr. Pozharsky says it’s okay if the omission was to be on “the safe and cautious side,” so long as “all parties in fact understand the true purpose” of the contract. He then spells that out, saying the Blue Star work needs to include arranging a visit of “widely recognized and influential current and/or former US policy-makers to Ukraine . . . to close down for any cases/pursuits against [Zlochevsky] in Ukraine.”
An October 2016 email between a Blue Star employee and Mr. Schwerin includes the news that the Ukrainian government had ended its probe into Mr. Zlochevsky (about eight months after the Ukrainian prosecutor was fired). Mr. Schwerin congratulates the team on its “awesome work.” The Blue Star employee writes: “Thanks. U brought us in so take a victory lap.”

All of this suggests Joe Biden was fully aware that Hunter was selling the family “brand,” and that the Vice President was helping with the sale. It also raises new questions about the connection between Hunter’s job at Burisma and Joe’s work getting the Ukrainian prosecutor of Mr. Zlochevsky fired. None of it looks good.

https://apple.news/ACah_DpU_Rh-MLzpxh1hbpA

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Biden administration cracks down on tax cheats. Hunter
« Reply #739 on: December 08, 2023, 06:07:41 AM »
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/joe-biden-vowed-crack-down-tax-cheats-his-doj-just-charged-his-son

He wrote off a sex club as a business expense, and they weren't going to charge him?

Looks (to me) like Joe won't be the nominee.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2023, 06:09:57 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18290
    • View Profile
Turley, Hunter indictments designed to protect Joe
« Reply #740 on: December 08, 2023, 03:35:15 PM »
https://nypost.com/2023/12/08/opinion/hunter-indictment-designed-specifically-to-avoid-joe-biden

1. He let the statute of limitations expire on charisma.

2.  He completely ignored the foreign agent f a r a violations.

3.  The indictments have nothing to do with how the money was earned, only that taxes weren't paid on it. No unindicted co-conspirator etc.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2023, 04:19:09 PM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #741 on: December 09, 2023, 07:21:17 AM »
Let's say Hunter gets his slap in the wrist.

I would place my bet Joe will pardon him.

Even before the election in case he loses.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69460
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #742 on: December 09, 2023, 07:25:29 AM »
My guess it will be in the interregnum abter the election and before , , , departure from office?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #743 on: December 09, 2023, 07:35:13 AM »
and one more point.

Turley makes it clear (and Dershowitz agrees, but he recommends a special counsel) why an impeachment inquiry is needed.

If the DOJ is not going to pursue a mountain of circumstantial evidence then Congress should.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Hunter : it is the GOP
« Reply #744 on: December 09, 2023, 10:06:42 AM »
typical for psychopathic naricssistic lying con artist:

his woes are always blamed on someone or something else
never really takes responsibility for his actions

it is the GOP hit mob
it is his poor addiction disease

etc.

this is classic stuff.
Trump has this too but he has legitimate complaints as well for sure from the lawfare media DNC shysters

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-casts-himself-victim-claiming-republicans-trying-kill-me

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Oversight Committee on Biden’s Criminal Activities
« Reply #745 on: December 11, 2023, 10:41:55 PM »
A survey of Biden’s criminal activity:

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1734394329852936353?fbclid=IwAR0QrVhxX5M8UWePNXX4ZwcL5v-rk-MqdffCX3xN7BdWab5BbZJVJflb0UI

Hey. Everybody needs 20 shell companies to handle their finances, right?

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18541
    • View Profile
Sara Biden another crooked Biden attorney
« Reply #747 on: December 12, 2023, 06:41:22 AM »
good morning BBG,

I can't see the list in the first post perhaps because it is on X which I do not subscribe to.
" Here were some of our biggest revelations 👇"

for me the rest of the page is a white blank.

if Biden was Trump we would be seeing things like this:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/exclusive-former-mar-a-lago-employee-turned-witness-repeatedly-contacted-by-trump-and-associates-before-documents-charges/ar-AA1lm1Ia