There is a reason I bring this up today from the Memory Hole:
https://gazette.com/.../article_bd0ec09a-cdf0-11eb-989f...
By the way, until I saw this particular piece I did not know the reporter who broke the story was Hillaried , , ,
The article does miss two highly significant details though when it writes:
"The meeting took place days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced the bureau would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton's wife, for her emails. However, Comey called her handling of classified information "extremely careless."
FIRST DETAIL: Decisions about whom to prosecute are made by the Dept of Justice i.e. AG Lynch. However due to her getting caught in this violation of the canons of judicial ethics by having an ex parte meeting without representatives of both sides being present in political terms Lynch was a non-starter to make the decision.
It was at this moment Comey leaped into the vacuum and purported to make the decision to not prosecute-- a decision which in no way was his to make! After all the FBI is for INVESTIGATION, NOT PROSECUTION.
Given the highly perfidious behavior of the seventh floor of the FBI in burying Hillary's many felonies in the saga of her illegal private email server, her destruction of 33,000 Congressionally subpoenaed emails, and much more it seems safe to say that this was a highly purposeful overreach designed to get Hillary off the hook for her many serious felonies.
This brings us to the SECOND DETAIL, which is the standard of the statute against mishandling top secret materials. Remember this is what was used to prosecute and convict genuine war hero General Petraeus for letting his biographer (and lover), whose clearance was a step below his ("Secret" as vs. his "Top Secret") -- in other words this stuff is taken seriously-- as it should be.
Most felonies have a standard of "intent"-- but given the gravity of the consequences of the crime in question, the statute merely requires "recklessness"-- so note well Comey's misdirect with the slickly chosen phrase "extemely careless" so as to avoid its homonym "reckless".
All this comes to mind with today's revelation of President visiting a primary witness in Hunter's upcoming gun trial:
https://www.msn.com/.../joe-biden-visits.../ar-BB1n8Ioj Witness tampering anyone?
Note too this:
"Joe Biden’s visit to Hallie Biden follows a state dinner held by the White House last week with Hunter Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland on the guest list.
"Garland is responsible for appointing special counsel David Weiss, who is leading the prosecution of Hunter Biden. The younger Biden’s attorneys have unsuccessfully sought to dismiss his gun charges based on arguments that Weiss is unlawfully appointed and selectively prosecuting Biden, even though Weiss’s boss is an appointee of Biden’s father."
Meanwhile in the Spermy Daniels trial wherein a State DA prosecutes an unnamed federal election crime which as a State DA he does not have the authority to do, the State gets to go last with the jury meaning the defense had to do its summation without knowing what the federal charge was-- the one purported to rectify the fact that the state misdemeanor charge was years past the statute of limitations.
THIS IS GENUINE BANANA REPUBLIC STUFF FOLKS!!!
Nothing to see here folks, keep moving, keep moving , , ,