Author Topic: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, Durham, Mar a Lago and related matters  (Read 205730 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #800 on: August 21, 2018, 05:03:26 PM »
The complaint comes down to this:  Those devious Russkis affected the outcome of the election by informing the American voters of a missing piece of the Truth.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile

rickn

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
Cohen Plea
« Reply #802 on: August 21, 2018, 05:37:23 PM »
A guilty plea creates no precedent.  It is simply the decision of Cohen to admit to these allegations in return for the government agreeing not to oppose a sentence greater than 63 months.  He was in much bigger trouble for the income tax and bank fraud allegations - like Manafort got hit with today.

It is not a campaign contribution for a candidate to settle with his own private funds a prior disputed allegation of a personal nature that does not involve actions that occurred during the campaign - even if the settlement would benefit the campaign by imposing a nondisclosure agreement upon the complaining parties.

Cohen was reimbursed with funds from the Trump real estate company - not the Trump campaign.  The US Attorney's written plea agreement and complaint alleges and admits this important fact.  So, if Trump authorized Cohen to settle the Stormy Daniels and the McDougal allegations with money settlements paid by funds that were not part of the Trump campaign, there is no campaign finance violation.  The fact that Cohen advanced the funds personally in one instance and convinced the National Enquirer to advance the funds in another instance does not make either transaction into a campaign contribution when the intended reimbursement for the settlements was always going to come from Trump's personal funds in his business. 

The Chief Asst. US Attorney running the case was a Preet Bharra appointee and Bharra was fired by Trump as US Atty for that District of NY shortly after Trump took office.  So, this was a form of political payback by forcing Cohen to make Trump look bad with guilty pleas to legally dubious counts in return for sentence leniency. 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile
Is this headline accurate?
« Reply #803 on: August 21, 2018, 05:38:21 PM »
Third post

Unfamiliar with this source-- Is the headline accurate?

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/comey-deleted-obamas-name-from-hillary-hacked-emails-report/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Thanks for your opinion
« Reply #804 on: August 21, 2018, 06:32:14 PM »
RickN   

wrote "....there is no campaign finance violation....."

Yet the MSM will go on and on with this every minute of every day as thought this nails Trump.

"The Chief Asst. US Attorney running the case was a Preet Bharra appointee and Bharra was fired by Trump as US Atty for that District of NY shortly after Trump took office.  So, this was a form of political payback by forcing Cohen to make Trump look bad with guilty pleas to legally dubious counts in return for sentence leniency."

Yes. And a couple years ago I posted on DBF that Preet was a hero of mine for white collar crime busting.   Then when Trump came along and fired all the US Attorney's (like previous presidents) Preet distinctly, and as far as I read uniquely, came out in public and requested he be allowed to keep the position.   When Trump, or team denied it , he   publicly  showed his displeasure as though he alone deserved special treatment.  I lost my admiration for him.  It would not surprise me if he did have something to do with this.
It seems (witness Brennan and many others in intelligence) that they are vengeful whenever they get their feathers ruffled.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #806 on: August 22, 2018, 04:30:25 AM »
In Stalinist and likely after in  Russia the secret police would kidnap someone then either beat the heck out of him or stick a gun to his/her head and order them to sign a confession

Here they just threaten you with jail till you die
unless you state the words we tell you to read off the paper which you will sign

So destroying hard drives, lying to Federal officials  ignoring intelligence laws was poor judgement but paying off a couple of girls to be silent about affairs is watergate and crimes of the century .  Like girls have not been paid off before.


Hillary must be laughing.  What a joke , her dear *admirer* Lanny Davis is Cohen's lawyer who obviously was biased up the rear end.

The Repubs should stand up to this .    I am not confident they will do that  like the Dems always do when a lot is at stake.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2018, 07:04:09 AM by ccp »

rickn

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #807 on: August 22, 2018, 05:10:48 AM »
Trump settled two disputed claims for money.  He denies having an affair with McDougal.  He denies having consensual sex with Clifford aka Daniels.  In the presidential campaign, both women came forward with their stories not for political purposes but for the purposes of getting paid for telling them.  Both claims involve acts alleged to have occurred in about 2005-06.  Both women had hired their own lawyers to pitch their stories to the tabloid media.  Both women sought to use the presidential campaign as leverage  in order to make their stories more valuable to them.

Neither woman was paid with any funds from the Trump campaign.  Cohen drew funds from his home equity line of credit to set up a corporation that paid Clifford.  The National Enquirer paid McDougal.  The fed complaint alleges that both payments were made with the expectation of reimbursement from Trump.  At the same time, Cohen was a VP in a Trump corporation.  He was reimbursed by the same corporation for an amount of money needed to reimburse him for paying Clifford, the amount needed to reimburse the National Enquirer for paying McDougal, and a bonus for his work in securing the NDA settlements.  The amount was grossed up for tax purposes so Cohen had enough after-tax money to make the reimbursements.

Preet Bharra's successor alleges that these transactions constitute campaign contributions because they were done, in part, to influence the 2016 election.  Of course, Preet Bharra himself had asserted in the recent past a now discredited and overly broad theory about what constituted insider trading.  His office used this theory to extract guilty pleas from certain traders.  When his theory was challenged in court by a defendant who chose not to plead guilty, it was overturned by SCOTUS.  Just because a prosecutor alleges that certain actions violate a statute does not mean that the prosecutor is correct.

The US Atty's theory of the case is that any time a person becomes a candidate for any office governed by federal campaign finance laws, that person cannot instruct his or her lawyer to settle disputed claims confidentially through intermediaries even when no campaign funds are used because the advancement of funds for the settlement by the intermediary is a campaign contribution.  That is absurd.

Compare to DNC, Fusion GPS and Steele Dossier

Remember that Fusion GPS was hired by a law firm in which a DNC officer or director was a partner.  The DNC was billed by the law firm and reimbursed the firm for the retainer fee paid to Fusion GPS.

Fusion GPS then hired Steele and was reimbursed by the law firm for the costs of hiring Steele.  The law firm, in turn, was paid by the DNC.  The purpose of these transactions was to influence the 2016 election.

Under the SDNY theory, the funds advanced by the law firm to pay Fusion GPS would constitute campaign contributions.

Compare to Hillary and Email Destruction

Hillary Clinton hired a third party to destroy those 33,000 emails on her server with BleachBit so they could not be used against her in her presidential campaign.  Under the SDNY theory, these payments would constitute campaign contributions. 

We face grave danger from corrupt prosecutors from within our own legal system when they abuse their powers in order to use unproven legal theories in order to embarrass a political opponent.  I am much more concerned about these abuses of prosecutorial discretion than I am about whether Trump had consensual sex one time with a porn star more than 10 years ago.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18299
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #808 on: August 22, 2018, 07:00:03 AM »
I agree with all of this, great post by Rick.

"Just because a prosecutor alleges that certain actions violate a statute does not mean that the prosecutor is correct."

I was going to say the reverse, just because the conduct did not constitute a crime does not mean some prosecutor will not run full speed with it.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Levin : Trump obviously in clear
« Reply #809 on: August 22, 2018, 08:54:30 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18299
    • View Profile
Re: Levin : Trump obviously in clear
« Reply #810 on: August 22, 2018, 09:14:23 AM »
It is imperative that repubs win the House Nov MORE then ever.

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/levin-on-cohen-guilty-plea-donald-trumps-in-the-clear/

This follows closely with what Rick wrote. Nothing was adjudicated here, it wasn't a campaign contribution and it doesn't matter what a prosecutor or defense lawyer say. Regarding Lanny Davis & Cohen, we have no idea what else Cohen was involved with that motivates a guilty plea to unrelated charges.

A rich, married men paying to hush up infidelity allegations is certainly not exclusively a campaign expense. Imagine the trouble he'd be in if he had paid this with campaign funds.

With two years of Investigations and gushing leaks, I'm surprised we haven't learned worse about Trump's prior business dealings.  He is in the clear or else Mueller and his band of media megaphone Democratic activist are keeping the biggest political secret ever.

Slightly off topic and rhetorical only, how does a germaphobe have sex with Stormy Daniels?  Yuck.

rickn

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #811 on: August 22, 2018, 10:29:54 AM »
We don't know exactly what legal jeopardy was being faced by Cohen because the US Atty proceeded by complaint with an attached plea deal.  In the federal system, the govt can initiate a criminal case by grand jury indictment or by complaint.  What occurred in this case was that the govt and Cohen negotiated a deal before legal proceedings began.  The government then filed a complaint limited to those claims to which Cohen agreed to plead guilty.  Then, Cohen pled guilty to those specific crimes pursuant to an agreement for a sentence no more than 63 months. 

The time stamped date of the complaint was yesterday, August 21.  And the complaint was filed along with the written plea and sentence agreement signed by the US atty and Cohen himself.  What we don't know are the other charges against Cohen that the government was considering before Cohen took the deal.  Those things get swept under the rug when a deal like this one is filed.

We do know that Cohen failed to declare about $4 million as income from 2012-2016.  And he lied on an application for a home equity line of credit.

But I still remain unconvinced that if a candidate for any federal office settles disputed claims about past extramarital relationships by paying the claimants money in return for an NDA, that this constitutes a campaign contribution. 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #812 on: August 22, 2018, 01:01:24 PM »
Outstanding clarity Rick!

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Cohen's word against Trump's
« Reply #813 on: August 22, 2018, 07:02:41 PM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The flow chart
« Reply #814 on: August 22, 2018, 09:22:23 PM »


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #816 on: August 23, 2018, 03:06:47 PM »
The worst part of this Mueller stuff is that we are going to be forced to listen to this endless propaganda  for the next 2.5 yrs  day in and day out.
They won't remove him (unless the liked of several big time loser Mitt Romney gets in the Senate.)

Is it too late to get another Repub other then Romney to run in UTAH - write in?


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Paul Sperry: FBI "Investigation" Into Weiner Laptop Was a Gigantic Fraud
« Reply #817 on: August 23, 2018, 03:09:06 PM »
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/376713.php

Paul Sperry: FBI "Investigation" Into Weiner Laptop Was a Gigantic Fraud Upon the Public;
FBI Only Looked at 3000 Emails, and Only Glanced At Those in a 12 Hour Window; Never Conducted Mandatory Security Assessment

Big, big story.

Don't expect Your Very Conservative Betters to note this, because they voted for Hillary or voted for a third party candidate with the hope that Hillary would win.

When then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was closing the Hillary Clinton email investigation for a second time just days before the 2016 election, he certified to Congress that his agency had "reviewed all of the communications" discovered on a personal laptop used by Clinton's closest aide, Huma Abedin, and her husband, Anthony Weiner.

At the time, many wondered how investigators managed over the course of one week to read the "hundreds of thousands" of emails residing on the machine, which had been a focus of a sex-crimes investigation of Weiner, a former Congressman.

Comey later told Congress that "thanks to the wizardry of our technology," the FBI was able to eliminate the vast majority of messages as "duplicates" of emails they’d previously seen. Tireless agents, he claimed, then worked "night after night after night" to scrutinize the remaining material.

But virtually none of his account was true, a growing body of evidence reveals.

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

BTW, Peter Strzok was one of those three FBI officials. The guy who spoke of an "insurance policy" against Trump's election. The guy who said that Trump would never win the election, because "we will stop him."

"Most of the emails were never examined, even though they made up potentially 10 times the evidence" of what was reviewed in the original year-long case that Comey closed in July 2016, said a law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation.
Yet even the "extremely narrow" search that was finally conducted, after more than a month of delay, uncovered more classified material sent and/or received by Clinton through her unauthorized basement server, the official said. Contradicting Comey's testimony, this included highly sensitive information dealing with Israel and the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas. The former secretary of state, however, was never confronted with the sensitive new information and it was never analyzed for damage to national security.

Even though the unique classified material was improperly stored and transmitted on an unsecured device, the FBI did not refer the matter to U.S. intelligence agencies to determine if national security had been compromised, as required under a federally mandated "damage assessment" directive.

The newly discovered classified material "was never previously sent out to the relevant original classification authorities for security review," the official, who spoke to RealClearInvestigations on the condition of anonymity, said.

Other key parts of the investigation remained open when the embattled director announced to Congress he was buttoning the case back up for good just ahead of Election Day.

One career FBI special agent involved in the case complained to New York colleagues that officials in Washington tried to "bury" the new trove of evidence, which he believed contained the full archive of Clinton's emails -- including long-sought missing messages from her first months at the State Department.

RealClearInvestigations pieced together the FBI's handling of the massive new email discovery from the "Weiner laptop." This months-long investigation included a review of federal court records and affidavits, cellphone text messages, and emails sent by key FBI personnel, along with internal bureau memos, reviews and meeting notes documented in government reports. Information also was gleaned through interviews with FBI agents and supervisors, prosecutors and other law enforcement officials, as well as congressional investigators and public-interest lawyers.

If the FBI "soft-pedaled" the original investigation of Clinton's emails, as some critics have said, it out-and-out suppressed the follow-up probe related to the laptop, sources for this article said.

"There was no real investigation and no real search," said Michael Biasello, a 27-year veteran of the FBI. "It was all just show -- eyewash -- to make it look like there was an investigation before the election."

Although the FBI's New York office first pointed headquarters to the large new volume of evidence on Sept. 28, 2016, supervising agent Peter Strzok, who was fired on Aug. 10 for sending anti-Trump texts and other misconduct, did not try to obtain a warrant to search the huge cache of emails until Oct. 30, 2016. Violating department policy, he edited the warrant affidavit on his home email account, bypassing the FBI system for recording such government business. He also began drafting a second exoneration statement before conducting the search.

The search warrant was so limited in scope that it excluded more than half the emails New York agents considered relevant to the case. The cache of Clinton-Abedin communications dated back to 2007. But the warrant to search the laptop excluded any messages exchanged before or after Clinton's 2009-2013 tenure as secretary of state, key early periods when Clinton initially set up her unauthorized private server and later periods when she deleted thousands of emails sought by investigators.

Far from investigating and clearing Abedin and Weiner, the FBI did not interview them, according to other FBI sources who say Comey closed the case prematurely. The machine was not authorized for classified material, and Weiner did not have classified security clearance to receive such information, which he did on at least two occasions through his Yahoo! email account – which he also used to email snapshots of his penis.

Many Clinton supporters believe Comey's 11th hour reopening of a case that had shadowed her campaign was a form of sabotage that cost her the election. But the evidence shows Comey and his inner circle acted only after worried agents and prosecutors in New York forced their hand. At the prodding of Attorney General Lynch, they then worked to reduce and rush through, rather than carefully examine, potentially damaging new evidence.

...


The FBI did not respond to requests for comment.

That's just the basics of the article.

Some key facts:

Hillary Clinton only turned over 30,000 emails to the Government which she and her lawyers deemed "relevant." The rest of the emails, she claimed, were about yoga routines and wedding plans, but no one was able to check on this, as she had deleted the rest of them. Bleach-bitted them, in fact.

There were nearly seven hundred thousand relevant emails on Huma Abedin's/convicted pervert Anthony Weiner's computer.

That's a lot of emails. A lot more than Clinton turned over.

However, the FBI repeatedly narrowed the search warrant for the emails that they would even bother receiving, to make sure that only the tiniest fraction of these 700,000 emails was even given a once-over.

The less evidence you even look at, the less likely it is you'll be forced to hurt Hillary Clinton's electoral chances, after all.

Even with such a massive narrowing of the evidence they were willing to look at -- just 3,077 out of the nearly 700,000 -- they still found new classified emails, even in that very limited sampling of emails.

Of course, the FBI, under Strzok's guidance, ignored the NY office's report that they had hundreds of thousands of emails relevant to the "Midyear Review." They delayed reviewing them for as long as they could -- they only wound up reviewing them when they found out that news had leaked and congressmen knew they were sitting on this.

Here's one exchange illustrating that:

By Oct. 21, Strzok had gotten the word. "Toscas now aware NY has hrc-huma emails," he texted McCabe’s counsel, Lisa Page, who responded, "whatever."
Four days later, Page told Strzok -- with whom she was having an affair -- about the murmurs she was hearing from brass about having to tell Congress about the new emails. "F them," Strzok responded, apparently referring to oversight committee leaders on the Hill.

Even IG Horowitz called the extremely restricted search of the emails "too narrow:"

"The FBI only reviewed emails to or from Clinton during the period in which she was Secretary of State, and not emails from Abedin or other parties or emails outside that period," Horowitz pointed out in a section of his report discussing concerns that the search warrant request was "too narrow."
That put the emails the New York case agent found between 2007 and 2009, when Clinton's private server was set up, as well as those observed after her tenure in 2013, outside investigators' reach. The post-tenure emails were potentially important, Horowitz noted, because they may have offered clues concerning the intent behind the later destruction of emails.

Remember, Clinton's IT guy destroyed the bulk of these emails off Hillary Clinton's servers right after speaking to Hillary Clinton's lawyer. He did this despite the fact that these were government records and they were under official request for disclosure by the government. The IT guy has never explained what Hillary Clinton's lawyer said in that conversation -- he claimed lawyer-client privilege, despite the fact that he had never been a client of that lawyer before. The IT guy was also found to be obviously, flagrantly lying when asked bout the emails.

These emails on the Abedin computer could have told us what happened to cause the destruction of so many emails from Hillary Clinton's servers. But Comey had decided to not even look into this potential obstruction of justice and destruction of government records, only searching her emails for classified-information violations, and the subsequent warrant for the Abedin/Weiner records likewise avoided searching them for evidence of obstruction of justice.

Even though it was impossible to search even these few emails and clear Hillary before the election, Strzok decided that they would do the impossible for Hillary anyway:

At the same time, they cut off communications with the New York field office. "We should essentially have no reason for contact with NYO going forward on this," Strzok texted Page on Nov. 2.
Strzok followed up with another text that same day, which seemed to echo earlier texts about what they viewed as their patriotic duty to stop Trump and support Clinton.

"Your country needs you now," he said in an apparent attempt to buck up Page, who was "very angry" they were having to reopen the Clinton case. "We are going to have to be very wise about all of this."

"We're going to make sure the right thing is done," he added. "It's gonna be ok."

Responded Page: "I have complete confidence in the [Midyear] team."

"Our team," Strzok texted back. "I'm telling you to take comfort in that." Later, he reminded Page that any conversations she had with McCabe "would be covered under atty [attorney-client] privilege."

The article then notes that Comey claimed it was now possible to do the impossible by an amazing technological breakthrough, in which computers would find the duplicate emails and thereby eliminate them from the need of human review.

But this was a lie. They only attempted this technological trick; it actually failed.

But according to the IG, FBI's technology division only "attempted" to de-duplicate the emails, but ultimately was unsuccessful. The IG cited a report prepared Nov. 15, 2016, by three officials from the FBI’s Boston field office. Titled "Anthony Weiner Laptop Review for Communications Pertinent to Midyear Exam," it found that "ecause metadata was largely absent, the emails could not be completely, automatically de-duplicated or evaluated against prior emails recovered during the investigation."
...

Contrary to Comey's claim, the FBI could not sufficiently determine how many emails containing classified information were duplicative of previously reviewed classified emails. As a result, hundreds of thousands of emails were not actually processed for evidence, law enforcement sources say.

"All those communications weren't ruled out because they were copies, they were just ruled out," the federal investigator with direct knowledge of the case said. The official, who wished to remain anonymous, explained that hundreds of thousands of emails were simply overlooked. Instead of processing them all, investigators took just a sample of the batch and looked at those documents.

Remember the very biased Agent #1 and Agent #5, one of whom cried when Hillary lost, and one of whom said he'd start carrying guns on the street to protect himself against Trump's America?

Here's what these two were telling each other during this "investigation:"

As the search was under way, one of the Midyear agents – Agent 1 -- confided to another agent in a Nov. 1 instant message on the FBI's computer network that "no one is going to pros[ecute Clinton] even if we find unique classified [material]."
But they also did their damnedest to avoid finding new classified material.

And so, given that there was no "amazing technological breakthrough" allowing them to complete this "review" and clear Hillary before the election, three agents, including Strzok, went through the 3,077 emails (out of almost 700,000) in just a 12 hour period.

Here's what Strzok said when his 12-hour fake-review was done and he had told Comey he could re-close this sham investigation:


As news of the case's swift re-closure hit the airwaves, Page and Strzok giddily exchanged text messages and celebrated. "Out on CNN now ... And fox... I WANT TO WATCH THIS WITH YOU!" Strzok said to Page. "Going to pour myself a glass of wine..."
And... even trying not to find new classified material, Hillary's emails were so stuffed with it they failed to miss the thing they were trying not to find:

Yet investigators nonetheless found 13 classified email chains on the unauthorized laptop just in the small sample of 3,077 emails that were individually inspected, and four of those were classified as Secret at the time.
Contrary to the FBI's public claims, at least five classified emails recovered were not duplicates but new to investigators.

The end of the article describes those Secret emails.

Read the whole thing. At least click the link and maybe look at some other headlines from Real Clear Investigations. They did amazing work here and should be rewarded.

rickn

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
The National Enquirer, Pecker, Cohen, et al
« Reply #818 on: August 23, 2018, 04:02:55 PM »
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/08/was_the_strange_language_in_michael_cohens_guilty_plea_a_setup.html

If reporters actually read the Information (Complaint) filed on Tuesday together with Cohen's plea agreement, you learn these important facts.

1.  The National Enquirer's Chairman, David Pecker, met with Cohen and an unnamed campaign official in August 2015 and offered to alert them to any potentially negative stories about Trump and women. (Paragraph 27 of Information)

2.  In June 2016, Pecker called Cohen and alerted him to the fact that Linda McDougal was offering to sell her story of a one year affair with Trump in 2006-07. (Par. 29)

3.  Cohen encouraged Pecker to buy the story by reminding him of his August 2015 offer to help Trump.  (Par. 29)

4.  Cohen promised to reimburse the National Enquirer for any money paid to McDougal. (Par. 29)

5.  The Enquirer bought McDougal's story on August 5, 2016 for $150,000.  (Par. 30)

6.  About 4 weeks later, Pecker and Cohen signed an agreement for Cohen to buy McDougal's story from the Enquirer for $125,000; but Pecker changed his mind before Cohen wired him the money.  (Par. 31)

7.  On 8 October 2016, Stormy Daniels' agent contacted the Enquirer and offered to sell her story of sex with Trump.  Her agent and lawyer were put in contact with Cohen by the Enquirer.  Over the next few days, Cohen negotiated a deal directly with Daniels' lawyer to pay her $130,000 in return for an NDA.  (Par. 32)

8.  Cohen didn't do anything more for about 2 and 1/2 weeks.  Then on the evening of October 25, 2016, Daniels' lawyer told the Enquirer that Cohen had not closed the deal and that Daniels was close to selling her story to a rival media outlet.  Pecker and his editor then called Cohen and told him about the problem and Cohen called Daniels' attorney and agreed to pay the money right away. (Par. 33)

9.  The next day, Cohen set up a new corporation.  The day after that, Cohen deposited $131,000 into the corporation's bank account.  This money came from Cohen's home equity line that was the subject of the Count VI bank fraud allegations. And Daniels was paid on November 1, 2016 when Cohen wired $130,000 of his home equity loan proceeds from the corporation's bank account to the account of Daniels' attorney. (Par. 34)

10.  In January 2017, Cohen sought reimbursement of the Stormy Daniels money, the $35 wire fee and a $50,000 tech consulting fee from Trump's company (not his campaign).  (Par. 37)

11.  The Information claims that Cohen was part of the Trump campaign because he had an email address at the campaign, sometimes advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press, and made media appearances on behalf of the campaign.  (Par. 25)

****************************
The basic theory of the government's case was that Cohen was part of the campaign; therefore, anything expenditure he made that could possibly benefit the candidate was a campaign expenditure even if there was a legitimate non-campaign reason to make the expenditure and even though Cohen also never had a formal title on the campaign.  The "at the direction of the candidate" were Cohen's words in his plea allocution on Tuesday.

The unnamed campaign officials were never identified.  Remember that Trump is identified as "Individual-1" in the Information.

Cohen also wore other hats in relation to Trump.  He was an officer in Trump's company.  And he acted as Trump's personal attorney on some matters.  

According to the Information, he National Enquirer people never spoke to anyone but Cohen about the two womens' stories.  The government does not allege that the Enquirer spoke to Individual-1.  Nor does the government allege that the Enquirer spoke to the other unnamed campaign officials mentioned vaguely in paragraph 27.  
« Last Edit: August 23, 2018, 07:30:08 PM by Crafty_Dog »


rickn

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #820 on: August 24, 2018, 05:12:02 AM »
Cohen's allocution that he made the payments at Trump's direction and with his authorization is most likely embellished.

The taped meeting leaked to the media occurred after AMI had bought McDougal's story and after Cohen had promised AMI that he would reimburse it for any money spent to buy McDougal's story.  How do we know that?  Because the tape replays discussions about Cohen's plan to buy the McDougal story from AMI - not from McDougal.  And it occurred before AMI decided not to accept reimbursement from Cohen.  At worst, Trump agreed to Cohen's plan to buy the story from AMI.  And with his own personal funds.  These facts do not indicate an intent to violate campaign finance laws.  Trump's insistence on a check and use of his personal funds indicate an intent to comply with campaign finance laws by using personal money to pay for personal expenditures.

More importantly, this meeting occurred weeks before Clifford even appeared at AMI seeking to sell her "story" of a one night stand with Trump in 2007.  And this was a story that she had been peddling for at least 5 year before that time.  Why?  Because her claim of intimidation from Trump's people occurred in Las Vegas in 2010 or 2011.  

Thus, as far as the publicly available information shows at this time, Trump ok'd Cohen's plan to buy the McDougal story from AMI.  Most likely Cohen sought this approval because, six weeks earlier, he had already promised to reinburse AMI if they bought the story and Cohen did not want to use his own money to pay AMI.  And, the publicly available information shows that Cohen's meeting with Trump occurred weeks before Stephanie Clifford even appeared at AMI seeking to sell her story.  Without further evidence, I don't believe Cohen's claim.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 05:13:38 AM by rickn »



G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18299
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian non-conspiracy, Mueller, not impartial Justice
« Reply #824 on: August 27, 2018, 08:02:28 AM »
What is the criminal difference between the alleged political contribution hidden and not reported by Michael Cohen and the work of Hillary's lawyers hiding and not reporting their contribution to Fusion GPS for the dossier

Question posed by Kim Strassel, wsj, and others.

Not impartial justice.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #825 on: August 31, 2018, 07:31:47 AM »
A question for the Rule of Law thread as well.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile
WSJ: Anatomy of a Fusion Smear
« Reply #826 on: August 31, 2018, 09:11:12 PM »
Anatomy of a Fusion Smear
Democrats and their media friends made false claims about a lawyer.
200 Comments
By The Editorial Board
Aug. 31, 2018 7:10 p.m. ET
Cleta Mitchell, a partner at Foley & Lardner in Washington, D.C., Feb. 6, 2014.


Cleta Mitchell is a top campaign-finance lawyer in Washington, D.C. This year she’s also been the target of a political and media smear that reveals some of the nastiness at work in the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

A partner at Foley & Lardner, Ms. Mitchell was astonished to find herself dragged into the Russia investigation on March 13 when Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee issued an interim report. They wrote that they still wanted to interview “key witnesses,” including Ms. Mitchell, who they claimed was “involved in or may have knowledge of third-party political outreach from the Kremlin to the Trump campaign, including persons linked to the National Rifle Association (NRA).”

Two days later the McClatchy news service published a story with the headline “NRA lawyer expressed concerns about group’s Russia ties, investigators told.” The story cited two anonymous sources claiming Congress was investigating Ms. Mitchell’s worries that the NRA had been “channeling Russia funds into the 2016 elections to help Donald Trump.”


Ms. Mitchell says none of this is true. She hadn’t done legal work for the NRA in at least a decade, had zero contact with it in 2016, and had spoken to no one about its actions. She says she told this to McClatchy, which published the story anyway.

Now we’re learning how this misinformation got around, and the evidence points to Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, the outfit that financed the infamous Steele dossier. New documents provided to Congress show that Mr. Simpson, a Fusion co-founder, was feeding information to Justice Department official Bruce Ohr. In an interview with House investigators this week, Mr. Ohr confirmed he had known Mr. Simpson for some time, and passed at least some of his information along to the FBI.

In handwritten notes dated Dec. 10, 2016 that the Department of Justice provided to Congress and were transcribed for us by a source, Mr. Ohr discusses allegations that Mr. Simpson made to him in a conversation. The notes read: “A Russian senator (& mobster) . . . [our ellipsis] may have been involved in funneling Russian money to the NRA to use in the campaign. An NRA lawyer named Cleta Mitchell found out about the money pipeline and was very upset, but the election was over.”

A spokesman for Adam Schiff, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, says the “Minority did not speak with Mr. Simpson or Fusion GPS about this,” though he declined to disclose who named Ms. Mitchell. Our sources say they can’t remember Ms. Mitchell coming up in any of the documents collected or witness interviews conducted for the investigation. So how did Mr. Schiff get his tip? Fusion’s media friends? Mr. Ohr? The FBI? Fusion GPS and Mr. Simpson did not answer a request for comment.

Ms. Mitchell says the fallout for her goes beyond inconvenience and a false allegation. Mr. Schiff’s team in May sent her a letter demanding testimony and documents, though no one in Mr. Schiff’s office alerted her before naming her in an official document.

She received similar demands from Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, who wanted Ms. Mitchell to turn over records related to “the transfer of money, or anything of value” between her and several Russians. After Ms. Mitchell in May responded that she had no information related to any of those Russians and accused the committee of being duped by “Glenn Simpson & Co.,” she heard nothing more.

But social media attacks on her haven’t ended. “That allegation impugns my ethical integrity and professional reputation,” she says, one reason she’s calling for Mr. Simpson to be prosecuted for lying to a federal official.

The Russian collusion accusations ginned up by Fusion at the behest of a law firm working for the Clinton campaign haven’t been corroborated despite two years of investigations. But no one should forget the smears that they and their media mouthpieces peddled along the way.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile



G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #833 on: September 11, 2018, 05:30:30 PM »
"Criminal acts."


Only if you are a Republican
and not a Democrat DC lawyer.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18299
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #834 on: September 12, 2018, 08:03:24 AM »
Just a note in time that Mueller missed the unofficial 60-day deadline of releasing a damaging report in the days coming in to an election.  If he had clear and convincing evidence from the beginning that Trump committed treason by colluding illegally with the enemy, wouldn't that have come out by now?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, and related matters
« Reply #835 on: September 12, 2018, 09:15:15 AM »
Just a note in time that Mueller missed the unofficial 60-day deadline of releasing a damaging report in the days coming in to an election.  If he had clear and convincing evidence from the beginning that Trump committed treason by colluding illegally with the enemy, wouldn't that have come out by now?

They would have illegally leaked to the DNC-MSM long ago.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Ah, it's only 13...
« Reply #836 on: September 13, 2018, 09:38:09 AM »
https://pjmedia.com/video/rep-jordan-thirteen-different-fbi-agents-were-working-with-one-reporter/

Nothing to see here, move along.

Not some sort of strategy to remove a lawfully elected president.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
A first though not getting hopes up
« Reply #839 on: September 15, 2018, 03:16:22 PM »
OMG five times over:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/obamas-former-white-house-counsel-lawyers-up-after-mueller-probe-referral/

A DC dem lawyer being investigated.

All we need is charges and threats he go to jail for rest of his life unless he flips on Baraq and tells the truth that Brock was involved in the cover up of Hillary and the Trump spying all along.

Then again dreams like this are only dreams...........





G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Let's see the evidence!
« Reply #844 on: September 21, 2018, 10:59:37 AM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18554
    • View Profile
Andrew McC on WSJ interview with Rosenstein
« Reply #848 on: October 20, 2018, 01:37:13 PM »
If I understand Andrew's review of the article it sounds as though EVEN the supposed conservative WSJ whitewashed Rosenstein's role in this whole affair:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/10/rod-rosenstein-interview-defends-mueller-probe/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69482
    • View Profile