Author Topic: Chuck Schumer  (Read 4776 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19322
    • View Profile
Chuck Schumer
« on: January 07, 2017, 01:05:22 PM »
I dunno if CD thinks this guy is worthy of his own thread.  But if so this is worthy of the first post in the thread:

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/hey-someone-tell-chuck-schumer-size-matters

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71378
    • View Profile
Re: Chuck Schumer
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2017, 05:52:17 PM »
It wouldn't have occurred to me, but I am not opposed  :-D

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19322
    • View Profile
Re: Chuck Schumer
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2017, 10:01:44 AM »
http://nypost.com/2017/01/08/democrats-wage-anti-trump-offensive-for-their-own-gain/

"The leaks came after Trump expressed doubts about Russia’s role and any election impact. Lest the rookie miss the message, Chuck Schumer, the Dems’ man in the Senate, made like a Soprano in a TV interview: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

Going public with classified information, which the leakers did, is a crime, but these days it’s acceptable if it serves the left’s political purpose.
Is Schumer suggesting CIA analysts would stay silent about a terrorist plot? Would they feed Trump misinformation to get back at him?"

Schumer needs to explain this statement up front and center!

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Chuck Schumer makes a good argument for gutting federal agencies!
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2017, 11:43:00 AM »
http://nypost.com/2017/01/08/democrats-wage-anti-trump-offensive-for-their-own-gain/

"The leaks came after Trump expressed doubts about Russia’s role and any election impact. Lest the rookie miss the message, Chuck Schumer, the Dems’ man in the Senate, made like a Soprano in a TV interview: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

Going public with classified information, which the leakers did, is a crime, but these days it’s acceptable if it serves the left’s political purpose.
Is Schumer suggesting CIA analysts would stay silent about a terrorist plot? Would they feed Trump misinformation to get back at him?"

Schumer needs to explain this statement up front and center!

I'm sure the MSM will press him on this.  :roll:

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19058
    • View Profile
Re: Chuck Schumer
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2017, 11:06:02 PM »
"...worthy of his own thread? "

Run of the mill leftist, on a par with Dick Durbin, Pelosi, Reid and Wasserman-Schultz.  Foes anybody see any more in him than that?

More important (sadly) might be Claire McCaskill, the 8th most centrist Dem in a 52-48 Senate, and other red-state Dem Senators, especially those up for reelection.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19322
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71378
    • View Profile
Re: Chuck Schumer
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2017, 05:18:11 AM »
An awesome moment but Schumer does not embarrass easily.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19058
    • View Profile
Sen Chuck Schumer D-NY, Called out for Outrageous Lie
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2017, 05:12:39 PM »
March 21 2017  Wzshington Post, by Mark Berman
Schumer: ‘Unseemly’ to confirm Gorsuch amid FBI probe of Trump campaign

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-hearings-updates-and-analysis-on-the-supreme-court-nominee/schumer-unseemly-to-confirm-gorsuch-amid-fbi-probe-of-trump-campaign/?utm_term=.30fb10af3527

“I’d like to point out that it is the height of irony that Republicans held this Supreme Court seat open for nearly a calendar year while President Obama was in office, but are now rushing to fill the seat for a president whose campaign is under investigation by the FBI,” Schumer said, according to remarks sent out by his office.

Schumer said that, to him, it appeared “unseemly to be moving forward so fast on confirming a Supreme Court Justice with a lifetime appointment” due to the looming FBI investigation, which could potentially last for months or years.

“You can bet that if the shoe was on the other foot – and a Democratic president was under investigation by the FBI – that Republicans would be howling at the moon about filling a Supreme Court seat in such circumstances,” Schumer said. “After all, they stopped a president who wasn’t under investigation from filling a seat with nearly a year left in his presidency.”
------------------------------------------

That wasn't just false, Schumer knew it was false.  Trump was not under investigation.  Schumer was part of the gang of 8 that was briefed by James Comey.  Everyone knew Trump was not under investigation EXCEPT the American public, because no one was allowed to tell them.

His good friend Sen Grassley is now calling him out on it.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/grassley-schumer-knew-trump-was-not-under-investigation-when-he-publicly-claimed-otherwise-video/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19322
    • View Profile
Chuck sends the goons after those who threatened his niece
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2022, 06:57:24 AM »
https://www.themix.net/2022/04/amy-schumer-says-secret-service-got-involved-after-receiving-death-threats-for-oscars-joke-involving-kirsten-dunst/

I am ok with investigating this
but why the SS

why not local authorities ...

who would have jurisdiction?

it pays to be a star

and a niece of a Democrat Senator


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2832
    • View Profile
More Chuckles Grandstanding
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2024, 03:00:50 PM »
Given how tight things are in the Senate this will be difficult to get through, and assuming the House has to concur, and then Biden would need to sign it, my guess is this amounts to little more than grandstanding and perhaps an attempt to give the current news cycle something to focus on other than Biden’s dotage. And hey, given Biden’s various questionable actions, he might not sign any legislation lest it boomerang anyway….

Schumer pushing bill to strip Trump of court-granted immunity
The Hill News / by Alexander Bolton / Jul 8, 2024 at 4:41 PM

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced Monday that he and other Senate Democrats will work to advance legislation to strip former President Trump of the immunity he was granted under a recent Supreme Court ruling protecting a president’s official acts from criminal prosecution.

Schumer, invoking Congress’s powers to regulate the courts, said Democrats are working on legislation to classify Trump’s efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 election as “unofficial acts” so they do not merit immunity from criminal prosecution under the high court’s recent 6-3 decision.

“They incorrectly declared that former President Trump enjoys broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions he took while in office. They incorrectly declared that all future presidents are entitled to a breathtaking level of immunity so long as their conduct is ostensibly carried out in their official capacity as president,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.

Schumer said the court’s conservative justices had “effectively placed a crown on Donald Trump’s head,” putting him above the law and making him “in many ways untouchable.”

“I will work with my colleagues on legislation classifying Trump’s election subversion acts as unofficial acts not subject to immunity,” he announced. “We’re doing this because we believe that in America no president should be free to overturn an election against the will of the people, no matter what the conservative justices may believe.”

Schumer said senators will keep on working on other proposals to “rein in the abuse of our federal judiciary.”

Some Democrats, including Sens. Chris Van Hollen (Md.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), have expressed support for adding language to the Supreme Court’s annual funding bill that would require it to adopt an enforceable code of ethics.

Government watchdog groups, Democratic lawmakers and media pundits have criticized conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito for accepting tens of thousands of dollars in free travel and other gifts from wealthy benefactors.

The Supreme Court granted Trump substantial immunity when it ruled on July 1 that Trump and future presidents could not be prosecuted for crimes related to official acts but left it to lower courts to determine whether Trump’s actions to overturn the results of the 2020 election fell under the category of official acts.

Some legal analysts, however, think the ruling may protect Trump entirely from being prosecuted for the attempts to overturn the election results, which resulted in a mob storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, because it would bar prosecutors from presenting actions related to official conduct to a jury as evidence.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4760638-schumer-trump-immunity/