Media, Ministry of Truth Issues

[G M]

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/370697.php

John Sexton: The Media Is Executing the Tricks They Wargamed Out in Their "JournOList" ListServ With Abandon
Important reminder from Sexton: the JournOLists, who now occupy positions of authority in the media, and are also Agents of Infection for the herd, worked out these techniques in 2008, and are deploying them now.

The JournOlisters went into a frenzy after the Jeremiah Wright story. The three strategies they proposed for disappearing the story were (as John Sexton categorizes them) "Kill it" by smearing mainstream media people writing about the story, "Ignore it" by simply refusing to report on it at all, and smearing anyone even talking about the story as "racists."

Sexton points out that these tactics -- once considered controversial enough that even fellow JournOListers had qualms about them -- are now simply SOP for the DNC Media now:

The Journolist discussion took place nearly a decade ago, but in retrospect, I’m struck by how these three basic approaches—kill it, ignore it, call them haters—seem like media archetypes now. You can probably think of your own examples but the ones that come immediately to mind are CBS News decision to sit on video showing President Obama had not called the Benghazi attack terrorism the day after the attack.
You may recall that Obama was widely considered the loser of the 1st presidential debate with Mitt Romney. He needed a comeback win. And the winning moment of the 2nd debate was his exchange with Romney on Benghazi. Obama claimed he had called the attack terrorism the next day. But an excerpt from 60 Minutes which remained on the cutting room floor showed that wasn’t true. CBS News knew it had the clip which would cut the legs out from Obama after the 2nd debate and it sat on until a couple days before the election when it quietly posted it online.

And on that, I hear very good things about Sheryl Attkinson's new book "The Smear," which recounts all the bias and #FakeNews of the past couple of years -- most of which you've probably forgotten about, as there's so much new #FakeNews every day.

[ccp]

"The Media Is Executing the Tricks They Wargamed Out in Their "JournOList"

no doubt this is coordinated with the DNC

Rush was pointing out that the drive byes are beside themselves about other media that opposes them like drudge breitbart fox and talk radio
they are pissed they cannot control the entire conversation anymore like the scum did wiht Nxion

[Crafty_Dog]

http://www.westernjournalism.com/ratings-show-megyn-kellys-new-show-still-losing-viewers/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=AE&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-07-17

[Crafty_Dog]

https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/german-media-failed-to-report-refugee-crisis-honestly-study-claims

[G M]

https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/german-media-failed-to-report-refugee-crisis-honestly-study-claims

Thank god journalists here are professional and honest!

[ccp]

https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/2016-election-demise-journalistic-standards/

[Crafty_Dog]

On our satellite TV, FOX is 360, FOX Business at 359 and various other news and public interest channels  are nearby.  CNN is at 202 for some reason.

Recently I noticed OAN at 347.  My wife googled a bit and apparently behind it is a San Diego businessman with other media interests as well.  I would say that OAN's orientation is "Trumpist".

There is near zero attention to the reporters and who they are.  There is near zero Washington gossip.  There are very few commercials (perhaps because the network/channel is new?).   What there is is LOTS of news about all kinds of things from around the country and around the world-- with occasional quickie segments on American history.

At present the show is one hour that repeats, with each hour replacing older segments in the one hour loop as new ones become available.

Worth keeping an eye on I'm thinking , , ,

[ccp]

http://www.oann.com/

[Crafty_Dog]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html

[G M]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html

Shocking!   

[Crafty_Dog]

Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination.

[Crafty_Dog]

http://therightscoop.com/breaking-fbi-email-dump-reveals-collusion-between-media-and-doj-to-squash-2016-lynch-clinton-meeting/#ixzz4ooNXPXxM

[Crafty_Dog]

second request:  I need this to shut someone the F up.


Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination

[DougMacG]

second request:  I need this to shut someone the F up.

Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination

Could be this...  ?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/us/politics/trump-affirmative-action-universities.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

[Crafty_Dog]

The Leftmedia has one objective: To vilify the Trump administration whenever the opportunity arises. Of course, this opens the door to gross bias and stories that are just flat-out wrong. The coinage for this is the now-ubiquitous term "fake news." The New York Times was caught once again spreading propaganda in its report on the latest Climate Science Special Report (CSSR). The final draft contains the typical anxiety-laden language of how man-made global warming will be significantly detrimental to humanity. But the Times' politicking of the CSSR's plight is even worse.

Initially, Fox News points out, "The [NYT] story ... said the draft report 'has not yet been made public' but 'a copy of it was obtained by The New York Times.'" Only that erroneous claim didn't fly for very long. And it wasn't whistleblowers who exposed the Times' duplicity.

Rutgers professor Bob Kopp, who contributed to CSSR, tweeted, "It's not clear what the news is in this story; posted draft is public review draft from Dec, and WH review hasn't yet missed Aug 18 deadline" to officially endorse the CSSR. A few moments later he added, "The Times' leaked draft has been on the Internet Archive since January, during the public comment period." Kopp's colleague Katharine Hayhoe likewise tweeted, "Important to point out that this report was already accessible to anyone who cared to read it during public review & comment time. Few did."

Translation: Nothing was really leaked at all. The Times' story now contains this correction: "While it was not widely publicized, the report was uploaded by the nonprofit Internet Archive in January; it was not first made public by The New York Times." Oops. What the Times saw was a chance to exploit an obscure report to further its agenda of portraying Donald Trump as a Neanderthal who "could change or suppress the report" without the public's knowledge. It also attempted to paint ecofascists as good Samaritans who had no choice but to "leak" a report to save humanity. Instead, the public now has even more proof that the Times continues to lack journalistic integrity.

[G M]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/16/now-theyre-comparing-antifa-to-american-vets/?utm_source=site-share

I recall being told that these are professional journalists.

[G M]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/16/now-theyre-comparing-antifa-to-american-vets/?utm_source=site-share

I recall being told that these are professional journalists.

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” -G. Orwell

[ccp]

http://freebeacon.com/politics/cnn-questions-barcelona-attack-copycat-charlottesville/

[G M]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/16/now-theyre-comparing-antifa-to-american-vets/?utm_source=site-share

I recall being told that these are professional journalists.

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” -G. Orwell

https://i.redditmedia.com/Q58W_Y0WuL1CbKX2LRdQdUbhCt-nJzbHlK94_SSMXRo.jpg?w=800&s=702e32cdbe520cd85b0c10008e296f19

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Third-International

Third International
ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES
WRITTEN BY: The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica
See Article History
Alternative Titles: Comintern, Communist International


Third International, also called Communist International, byname Comintern, association of national communist parties founded in 1919. Though its stated purpose was the promotion of world revolution, the Comintern functioned chiefly as an organ of Soviet control over the international communist movement.

The Comintern emerged from the three-way split in the socialist Second International over the issue of World War I. A majority of socialist parties, comprising the International’s “right” wing, chose to support the war efforts of their respective national governments against enemies that they saw as far more hostile to socialist aims. The “centre” faction of the International decried the nationalism of the right and sought the reunification of the Second International under the banner of world peace. The “left” group, led by Vladimir Lenin, rejected both nationalism and pacifism, urging instead a socialist drive to transform the war of nations into a transnational class war. In 1915 Lenin proposed the creation of a new International to promote “civil war, not civil peace” through propaganda directed at soldiers and workers. Two years later Lenin led the Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia, and in 1919 he called the first congress of the Comintern, in Moscow, specifically to undermine ongoing centrist efforts to revive the Second International. Only 19 delegations and a few non-Russian communists who happened to be in Moscow attended this first congress; but the second, meeting in Moscow in 1920, was attended by delegates from 37 countries. There Lenin established the Twenty-one Points, the conditions of admission to the Communist International. These prerequisites for Comintern membership required all parties to model their structure on disciplined lines in conformity with the Soviet pattern and to expel moderate socialists and pacifists.

The administrative structure of the Comintern resembled that of the Soviet Communist Party: an executive committee acted when congresses were not in session, and a smaller presidium served as chief executive body. Gradually, power came to be concentrated in these top organs, the decisions of which were binding on all member parties of the International. Moreover, Soviet domination of the Comintern was established early. The International had been founded by Soviet initiative, its headquarters was in Moscow, the Soviet party enjoyed disproportionate representation in the administrative bodies, and most foreign communists felt loyal to the world’s first socialist state.

The realization that world revolution was not imminent led in 1921 to a new Comintern policy in order to gain broad working-class support. “United fronts” of workers were to be formed for making “transitional demands” on the existing regimes. This policy was abandoned in 1923, when the Comintern’s left wing gained temporary control. Joseph Stalin’s assault on the left group of his party, however, brought the expulsion of the Comintern’s first president, Grigory Y. Zinovyev, in 1926 and a further rapprochement with moderate socialism. Then Stalin’s move against the right wing of his party led to another turn in Comintern policy. In 1928 the sixth congress adopted a policy of “extreme leftism” set forth by Stalin: once again, moderate socialists and social democrats were branded as the chief enemies of the working class. The dangers of the rising fascist movement were ignored. In Germany in the early 1930s, the communists focused their attacks on the social democrats and even cooperated with the Nazis, whom they claimed to fear less, in destroying the Weimar Republic. World revolution was once more to be considered imminent, despite Stalin’s own concentration on “building socialism in one country.” At the Comintern’s seventh and last congress in 1935, Soviet national interests dictated a new policy shift: in order to gain the favour of potential allies against Germany, revolutionary ardour was dampened, and the defeat of fascism was declared the primary goal of the Comintern. Now communists were to join with moderate socialist and liberal groups in “popular fronts” against fascism. By now the Comintern was being used as a tool of Soviet foreign policy. The program of popular fronts ended with the signing of Stalin’s pact with Adolf Hitler in 1939. Soon, however, Germany and the Soviet Union were at war, and in 1943 Stalin officially dissolved the Comintern in order to allay fears of communist subversion among his allies. From the Soviet point of view, Moscow was confident of its ability to control the foreign communist parties; and, in any case, much of the Comintern organization was preserved intact within the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. In 1947 Stalin set up a new centre of international control called the Cominform, which lasted until 1956. The international communist movement broke down after 1956 owing to a developing split between the Soviet Union and China, among other factors.

[ccp]

https://www.spartareport.com/2017/08/pupu-files-psycho-joe-dumb-rock-mika-edition/

[ccp]

duh , whadd ya tink Fareed?

is strategy good?

surprise answer ,  "no"  (heavy on sarcasm!)

'what me need is more diplomacy':

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/08/21/cnns-zakaria-trump-afghanistan-speech-steve-bannon-need/

[G M]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/22/james-t-hodgkinson-attempted-assassin-of-steve-scalise-already-being-erased-from-history/?utm_source=site-share


James T. Hodgkinson, Attempted Assassin Of Steve Scalise, Already Being Erased From History
JIM TREACHER
Blogger
11:30 AM 08/22/2017
1930
We’ve been hearing a lot about “right-wing violence” lately. If we’re to believe our moral, ethical, and intellectual betters, there’s a Klansman on every street corner and a Nazi under every bed. There’s nothing more terrifying than a “white nationalist” who lives in his mom’s basement, which is why it’s okay for feral Antifa children to beat these guys up and drench them with balloons filled with piss. It’s “self-defense.”

But what happens when an act of violence is irrefutably motivated by left-wing ideology? What happens if, for example, a Bernie Bro named James T. Hodgkinson shoots at a bunch of congressmen for the explicit reason that he hates Republicans and wants them dead? How do we fit that into the preferred narrative?

We can’t. There’s no way. So we just leave it out entirely. Kristina Peterson, WSJ:

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R., La.) is relearning how to walk after being shot at a congressional baseball practice earlier this year, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) said…
“It was very emotional for us,” Mr. Ryan said at the end of the town hall held in his Wisconsin congressional district. “He has a long road ahead of him, but he’s going to be OK. His body’s healing.”
Mr. Scalise has undergone multiple surgeries after being shot in the hip on June 14 and was readmitted into the intensive care unit in early July due to infection concerns. He is now in rehabilitation and undergoing extensive physical therapy, Mr. Ryan said.
I’m glad Rep. Scalise is on the mend. But as I read that WSJ story, I can’t help but notice there’s no mention whatsoever of who shot him, or why. He’s recovering after “being shot.” Passive voice. A gun went off and a bullet hit him. No other details.

Who was the shooter? What was the motive? Did it just happen on its own, somehow? Is this normally how the WSJ reports on politicians who’ve been shot?

If James T. Hodgkinson had been a Trump supporter who shot and almost killed a Democratic congressman for political reasons, he’d be the most infamous man in America. But now, just two months after his attempt to murder a group of Republican lawmakers, he’s not even worth mentioning.

If I didn’t know better, I’d think the press is sad that Hodgkinson didn’t succeed.

[ccp]

ESPN  hides Robert Lee:
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/22/espn-pulls-asian-american-announcer-from-virginia-football-game-because-has-confederate-generals-name.html

[ccp]

On the "Constipated News Network " like only Levin can do:

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/lol-mark-levin-ridicules-insane-cnns-anti-trump-hysteria

[G M]

ESPN  hides Robert Lee:
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/22/espn-pulls-asian-american-announcer-from-virginia-football-game-because-has-confederate-generals-name.html

https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/900129932424118272



David Burge‏
@iowahawkblog



My Dearest Annabelle, I am beset by perplexities and distresses, I fear the war is lost
<mournful fiddle dirge>

3:57 PM - 22 Aug 2017

[Crafty_Dog]

http://www.dailywire.com/news/20337/fond-farewell-daily-wire-john-nolte?utm_source=dwemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=082917news&utm_campaign=position1

[G M]

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/371357.php

Bad polling?

[G M]

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/371382.php

CNN Host Takes Bullhorn and Whips Up Antifa Crowd;
CNN Refusing to Answer Questions About Incident
W. Kamau Bell hosts Perspectives, a community outreach program that runs from 4:15am to 4:25 am.

And he's now leading Antifa chants.

Tucker Carlson discussed this last night.

[Crafty_Dog]

I saw Tucker last night.  As usual, he was awesome.

Changing subjects, I would like to mention once again the OAN: One America Network.  With no opinions and no attention paid to the teleprompter readers, it has damn near four times the amount of news per hour as the other networks-- and there is no liberal/progressive bias!!! There are many stories about other parts of the world that I find interesting. The only drawback is a relatively slow turnover of stories.  What you see in the evening is pretty much what you saw in the morning.  Once a day suffices.

[G M]

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2017/09/01/nets-censor-bombshell-comey-didnt-wait-facts-rescue-hillary


Nets Censor Bombshell That Comey Didn’t Wait for Facts to Rescue Hillary
  
By Scott Whitlock | September 1, 2017 11:53 AM EDT

Conclusion first, facts second. That, allegedly, was the mentality of ex-FBI Director James Comey in dealing with Hillary Clinton’s e-mail scandal. Yet this revelation was ignored by ABC, CBS and NBC on Thursday and Friday. Comey, who was fired by Donald Trump in May, decided against criminal charges of Hillary Clinton before 17 interviews of witnesses were even complete. Fox News, MSNBC and CNN all highlighted the story.

Yet, despite a combined nine and a half hours of air time on Thursday night and Friday morning, the networks couldn’t be bothered. To be clear, the reason for ignoring this damning development WASN’T Hurricane Harvey. That natural disaster (deservedly so) garnered a lot of coverage.


But NBC’s Today, a four hour program, on Friday devoted four minutes and two seconds to finding the best new coffee maker. CBS This Morning looked at the future of Uber for three minutes and 53 seconds. (CBS News covered the story, but online.)  

ABC’s Good Morning America promoted “Force Friday” for two minutes and 17 seconds. Force Friday celebrates the release of new Star Wars toys. ABC is owned by Disney, the company that owns the sci-fi franchise. GMA made sure to tell viewers they could purchase toys on Walmart.com, a sponsor of the show. What was that journalists were saying about collusion and shady connections between powerful forces?  

Clearly, there was time for Comey on the networks.

Fox News Special Report host Bret Baier found the news to be a “fascinating development” and informed viewers: “Senate Republicans say they have evidence that then-FBI director James Comey came to his conclusions on the Clinton case long before all the facts were in about Clinton’s mishandling of classified information.”

Fox reporter Catherine Herridge explained:

According to senior Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI records indicate that former Director James Comey drafted a conclusion apparently exonerating Hillary Clinton the e-mail case two months before the investigation was over and before the FBI interviewed Clinton aide Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Brian Pagliano and Clinton herself. The FBI transcripts from interviews with two senior Comey aides are now coming to light after a records request from the Republican leaders on the Senate committee. They said it appears that in April or early May 2016, Comey had decided against criminal charges before 17 interviews were complete. Writing to the FBI, the Senators added, “Conclusion first, fact gathering second. That's no way to run investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard.” After he was fired by President Trump, Comey told Congress Loretta Lynch was the one who had politicized the e-mail case.
The ignoring of this twist in the Comey story is a contrast to the coverage of the ex-FBI Director’s congressional testimony. In June, excited CBS journalists touted, “historic” “history” that could shape U.S. “History.”

Thursday’s revelations were less historic, apparently.

A transcript of the FNC segment is below:



BRET BAIER: A fascinating twist tonight on the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation. Senate Republicans say they have evidence that then-FBI director James Comey came to his conclusions on the Clinton case long before all the facts were in about Clinton’s mishandling of classified information. Chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge is here tonight to explain. Good evening, Catherine.

CATHERINE HERRIDGE: Well, thank you, Bret. According to senior Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI records indicate that former Director James Comey drafted a conclusion apparently exonerating Hillary Clinton the e-mail case two months before the investigation was over and before the FBI interviewed Clinton aide Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Brian Pagliano and Clinton herself. The FBI transcripts from interviews with two senior Comey aides are now coming to light after a records request from the Republican leaders on the Senate committee. They said it appears that in April or early May 2016, Comey had decided against criminal charges before 17 interviews were complete. Writing to the FBI, the Senators added, “Conclusion first, fact gathering second. That's no way to run investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard.” After he was fired by President Trump, Comey told Congress Loretta Lynch was the one who had politicized the e-mail case.

SENATOR RICHARD BURR: Was your decision influenced by the Attorney General’s tarmac meeting with the former President Bill Clinton?

JAMES COMEY: Yes, ultimately in a conclusive way.

BURR: Were there other things that contributed the you can describe in an open session?

COMEY: At one point, the Attorney General attorney general have your directive enough to call it an investigation but to instead call it a matter.

HERRIDGE: But the new time line shows that Comey was drafting his statement even before the tarmac meeting. This finding comes a day after the FBI said it denied request for Clinton e-mails citing a lack of interest. Bret?

[ccp]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4858902/White-House-aides-trash-Bannon-60-minutes-interview.html

There is no way Charlie Rose will let him come out without ambushing him or Trump in some way.
Just not going to happen where Bannon will come out like a "Rose"  ( no pun intended)

So why do this for 60 minutes  if not for his own glory?

[G M]

https://pjmedia.com/video/the-media-really-likes-using-one-word-to-describe-trumps-daca-decision-cruel/


The Media Really Likes Using One Word to Describe Trump's DACA Decision-- 'Cruel'
 BY PJ VIDEO SEPTEMBER 6, 2017

Grabien released this montage proving that the mainstream media has an echo chamber; that they all like to use the same exact words to describe current events. In the case of President Trump rescinding the DACA protections, they all used the same word, "cruel." CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CNBC, Univision... all the same word. But there's no bias here, no way!

Is Trump's DACA decision "cruel"?

[DougMacG]

Wouldn't 'cruel' be the opposite, bringing your children to live where they are illegal.  Signing an Executive order that violates federal law and the constitution.  Circumventing Congress and leaving the people you say you are protecting one election and one signature away from reversal of the policy?  Cruel, if you ask me.

That said, isn't it embarrassing for our state media that they are so easily exposed for their unoriginality, collusion and plagiarism.  

It begs the question, who is your puppet master?  These montages have been putting themselves together since the 'gravitas' the Dick Cheney pick brought, what young George Bush lacked - according to (all of) them.

This is worse than the old Soviet Union; they only had one channel of state-run, Orwellian bullsh*t.

[ccp]

I suggest a bipartisanship deal

we grant all the illegal kids citizenship

and their parents. 

Thus the Repubs will be so *NICE* and *HUMANE*  and be *WHO WE  ARE* (speak for yourself Obama )

and we only require one thing.  That they can stay in this country only if for the rest of their lives they vote for Republicans. 

If recommend that we will see the DNC sending over the boarder by bullet trains.

We all know as Rush apply puts it , this is a Dem Party voter drive.

They can't bribe enough people here to vote for them so ship em in as fast as possible.

[G M]

Is there anyone on the planet who doesn't have a right to our tax dollars and citizenship? Who?

I suggest a bipartisanship deal

we grant all the illegal kids citizenship

and their parents. 

Thus the Repubs will be so *NICE* and *HUMANE*  and be *WHO WE  ARE* (speak for yourself Obama )

and we only require one thing.  That they can stay in this country only if for the rest of their lives they vote for Republicans. 

If recommend that we will see the DNC sending over the boarder by bullet trains.

We all know as Rush apply puts it , this is a Dem Party voter drive.

They can't bribe enough people here to vote for them so ship em in as fast as possible.

[ccp]

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/pence-trump-irma-concern/2017/09/10/id/812698/

thanks to the bashing of W during Katrina every hurricane etc now turns into a week of national hysteria
24 /7 on the news cycle and every politician tripping all over their feet to warn threaten cry and act scared and drop billions in airlift relief before the storm even hits.

I turn away from the news when this happens .  Tiring if you ask me.

[Crafty_Dog]

Looking to the upside, I'm thinking President Bush is looking , , , wait for it , , , presidential. 

[DougMacG]

https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2017/09/11/report-google-bias-against-leading-conservative-websites-is-real/

[Crafty_Dog]

Yes, it is Pravda on the Hudson, but this is a long and serious read which raises interesting questions:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/magazine/rt-sputnik-and-russias-new-theory-of-war.html?emc=edit_ta_20170913&nl=top-stories&nlid=49641193&ref=cta&_r=0

[Crafty_Dog]

http://www.thedailybeast.com/facebook-we-wont-reveal-if-russia-targeted-you

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/350965-facebook-under-fire-over-russian-ads-in-election

[Crafty_Dog]

https://online.flippingbook.com/view/223703/

[Crafty_Dog]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/nyregion/hatem-el-gamasy-bodega-television-egypt-pundit.html?emc=edit_th_20170917&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=49641193

[Crafty_Dog]

http://theredelephants.com/abc-reporter-calls-people-helping-houston-white-supremacists-regrets-immediately/

[ccp]

is stalking?  No reasonable expectation of privacy due to being a public restaurant?
Is it reasonable to expect someone is at next table taping your conversation?
one person state or district vs two person state.  None are *no person*

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/18/russia-incompetent-white-house-lawyers-discuss-probe-public/

[Crafty_Dog]

http://www.speroforum.com/a/APNAKSOYVC24/81721-Who-is-afraid-of-the-Big-Bad-Russian-media?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=PCCYQBJXQN34&utm_content=APNAKSOYVC24&utm_source=commentary&utm_term=Who+is+afraid+of+the+Big+Bad+Russian+media#.WcSvonrcCeQ

[ccp]

Crafty ,
Do you think the NYT should also have to register as a foreign (Russian) media source?   

[G M]

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/371690.php

Dershowitz: Why Is the Media Playing Down Valerie Plame's Nazi-Level Antisemitism?

The Entitled Caste protects other members of the Entitled Caste. That's the whole point of an Entitled Caste.

Related: Check out this thread from Omri Ceren noting that Plame is just talking the way Obama and Kerry talked about American Jews having a divided loyalty and controlling the country for Israel's interests.

[DougMacG]

Some must see tv, click on the video links.  Anthony Weiner sentenced today.  Flashback to the media defending him and trashing Breitbart for 'exposing' him.  Maddow does an entire segment on how he might have been hacked, and how Breitbart is always wrong, never apologizes...

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/09/toasted-weiner.php

NY Post headline:  Anthony Weiner Gets Hard Time

[G M]

Some must see tv, click on the video links.  Anthony Weiner sentenced today.  Flashback to the media defending him and trashing Breitbart for 'exposing' him.  Maddow does an entire segment on how he might have been hacked, and how Breitbart is always wrong, never apologizes...

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/09/toasted-weiner.php

NY Post headline:  Anthony Weiner Gets Hard Time

Weiner was being cultivated for the national level once he was the mayor of NYC. They had plans for him.

[Crafty_Dog]

https://pamelageller.com/2017/09/youtube-reinstates.html/