Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Crafty_Dog

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 1337
8


"Tariffs alone didn’t bring down the world economy of the 1930s. And tariffs are not the only problem the world economy today faces either."

Jude Wanniski saw the Great Dpression being a combo Smoot Hawley tariffs and their reciprocals, competive devaluations, and higher taxes combining to yield a fragmentation of the world economy.

Seeing all this a matter of fragmentation of the world economy makes sense to me.

The theoretical challenge here is to balance economic efficiency and maximization with supply chain and other strategic protections.

10
Politics & Religion / GPF: Russia's labor crunch
« on: March 15, 2025, 03:51:21 PM »


Russia’s Severe Labor Crunch
Authorities have turned to distant countries to supply migrant workers.

By Geopolitical Futures -March 14, 2025
Waning Migration Strains the Russian Labor Force
(click to enlarge)

The Kremlin needs higher production to meet the needs of the domestic economy, sustain exports and supply the military, but a severe labor shortage is holding it back. Russia faces persistent brain drain, a declining population, and rising demand for soldiers as well as workers in defense and import-substituting industries. The problem has deepened as migration from Central Asia declines due to tighter immigration policies. Skilled worker shortages have reached record levels, with the construction sector – traditionally reliant on migrants – experiencing the greatest strain. Although the central bank reports that an economic slowdown and tight monetary policy have alleviated some of the labor squeeze, authorities do not expect a rapid stabilization.

To sustain growth under sanctions, Russia has turned to nontraditional sources for skilled migrants – namely Africa, Latin America and South Asia. For example, Primorsky Krai and Amur oblast have recruited skilled workers from Myanmar, and Tatarstan hopes to do the same. Bashkortostan’s sewing industry has been approved to hire specialists from Southeast Asia, including Thailand, Vietnam and Bangladesh. Meanwhile, Kenya has agreed to send 10,000 workers to Russia.

11
Politics & Religion / Michael Yon with Steve Bannon
« on: March 15, 2025, 03:49:34 PM »

12
Politics & Religion / Hillsdale: Arnn:
« on: March 15, 2025, 03:43:51 PM »



https://x.com/Hillsdale/status/1899644767866159525

“Education is one of the most bureaucratized things. To break this system is the first step toward real education reform.”

The Department of Education (
@usedgov
) has got to go,
@DrLarryArnn
 told
@DLoesch
 on
@DanaLoeschRadio
.

18
Politics & Religion / Re: 2028
« on: March 15, 2025, 02:40:23 PM »
Rahn Emanuel could be formidable.

He has already spoken with some common sense, and has an interesting resume that could claim to be the kind of Democrat that people used to recognize.

20
Reading that made me think of the DIME analyses I posted at

https://firehydrantoffreedom.com/index.php?topic=1032.1450

Reply #1473

24
Politics & Religion / FO: China super pist off at Hutchinson Port Deal
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:43:36 PM »
Fourth

(12) CK HUTCHISON PORT DEAL “BETRAYAL OF ALL CHINESE PEOPLE”: China’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office issued an official opinion on the BlackRock-CK Hutchison port deal stating that it was a “betrayal of all Chinese people” and it “threatens to destroy the world, normal shipping, trade order and security.”

The Office further warned that this is likely a template for port mergers and acquisitions around the world that would take China years to recover from.

The Office closed the letter warning other companies to “think twice” about what is at stake when selling to the United States and that they should know “which side it should stand on.”

Why It Matters: This reaction will likely encourage the Trump administration to pursue further buyouts as a means of containing Chinese influence. This reaction also demonstrates to other Belt and Road Initiative participants that the Chinese government views all “private” investment overseas as a grave matter of national security. It will likely dissuade countries from renewing their memoranda of understanding. - J.V.

25
Politics & Religion / FO: Enemy Aliens Act
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:39:29 PM »
(3) TRUMP TO INVOKE ENEMY ALIENS ACT: A U.S. official said President Donald Trump is planning to invoke the 1798 Enemy Aliens Act as soon as today. The official said the Trump administration hopes invoking the act will unlock broad powers to arrest and deport illegal immigrants while bypassing immigration courts.

(4) FEMA PROBES AID ORGS FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN SMUGGLING: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) said it is investigating organizations that received grants through FEMA’s Shelter and Services Program to provide temporary housing and aid to illegal immigrants. FEMA Acting Director Cameron Hamilton said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is concerned the federal money was used for illegal activities, and the organizations may have violated federal laws against smuggling or transporting illegal immigrants.

26
Science, Culture, & Humanities / FO:
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:38:16 PM »

(1) JUDGES ORDER FIRED PROBATIONARY FEDS REINSTATED: Federal judges in California and Maryland ordered the Trump administration to reinstate probationary federal employees who were subject to mass layoffs from 19 federal agencies.
Why It Matters: The Trump administration and the courts are heading toward a confrontation over the lower federal courts’ attempts to assert authority over the executive branch. The courts appear to be pushing the Trump administration to defy court orders by issuing expansive temporary restraining orders, to manufacture a constitutional crisis Democrats could exploit ahead of the midterm elections. The Trump administration is attempting to force groups suing Trump to put up cash bonds for injunctions, a legal strategy outlined by former White House lawyer Dan Huff to deter lawsuits and avoid a crisis. - R.C.

=========

(3) TRUMP TO INVOKE ENEMY ALIENS ACT: A U.S. official said President Donald Trump is planning to invoke the 1798 Enemy Aliens Act as soon as today. The official said the Trump administration hopes invoking the act will unlock broad powers to arrest and deport illegal immigrants while bypassing immigration courts.
(4) FEMA PROBES AID ORGS FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN SMUGGLING: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) said it is investigating organizations that received grants through FEMA’s Shelter and Services Program to provide temporary housing and aid to illegal immigrants. FEMA Acting Director Cameron Hamilton said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is concerned the federal money was used for illegal activities, and the organizations may have violated federal laws against smuggling or transporting illegal immigrants.

27
Politics & Religion / MY: Panama Decree opens door to immigrants
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:34:35 PM »
Panama Decrees Open Door to "Immigrants"
Believe it or not...here is the Decree
Michael Yon
Mar 14

 

READ IN APP
 
Panama has officially opened the doors. To be replaced.

The following Decree is a red carpet to demographic replacement.

I include both the original and translated versions of the official Decree from 11 March 2025.

Please say if you see translation errors. I paid $160 yesterday for a human to translate not AI. But then the human may have used AI. I do not know:
———-
REPUBLIC OF PANAMA

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC SECURITY

EXECUTIVE DECREE NO. 6

OF 11 MARCH 2025

Which creates the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit

THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC

in the exercise of its constitutional and legal powers,

CONSIDERING:

Article 6(2) of Decree-Law 3 of February 22, 2008, establishes that it is the function of the National Migration Service to organize, direct, register, supervise, and provide immigration services to foreigners and to ensure the effective control of their stay in the country, within the limits indicated in that Decree-Law;

That with the creation of the Ministry of Public Security, through Law 15 of April 14, 2010, it was established that its mission is to determine the country's security policies, plan, coordinate, control, and support the efforts of the security and intelligence agencies that comprise it, with the National Migration Service being part of its operational level;

Article 9(3) of Decree-Law 3 of February 22, 2008, provides that the functions of the Ministry of the Interior and Justice, now the Ministry of Public Security, in matters of migration policy, are to recommend and develop the special measures to be taken by the Panamanian State to control, supervise, and prevent irregular migration;

That Articles 14 and 15 of Decree Law 3 of 2008 determine that the Executive Branch shall regulate the forms and conditions under which permits and visas shall be issued, in accordance with the principles of national security, health, public order, and protection of rights and freedoms; as well as the conditions and requirements that must be met to apply to each of the migratory categories and may create other migratory subcategories;

That the phenomenon of human mobility has posed significant challenges for countries of origin, transit, destination, and return, especially with regard to the protection and guarantee of the fundamental rights of children and adolescents, in strict compliance with national and international human rights standards;

That in recent years this situation has increased considerably and has been motivated by extreme poverty, lack of opportunities, economic inequalities, armed conflicts, political persecution and natural disasters, exposing foreign children and adolescents to multiple risks and threats that impact their well-being, growth and development;

That it is the responsibility of the Republic of Panama, through the National Migration Service, to maintain an orderly and transparent migration, with strict adherence to human rights and the migration law in force;

That it is the duty of the State to establish policies that respond to the needs of the country's economic development and that, in addition, it is its fundamental task to achieve economic rehabilitation and reduce the unemployment rate;

That through Executive Decree No. 393 of September 14, 2015, the State adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), whose objective No. 8 is Decent Work and Economic Growth, which establishes that in order to achieve sustainable economic development, it is necessary to increase labor productivity and reduce the unemployment rate;

That undocumented or irregular migrants have been identified as a group in a situation of vulnerability, since they are the most exposed to potential or actual violations of their rights and suffer a high level of lack of protection of their rights as a result of their situation;

That the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development needs to attend to nationals and migrants in vulnerable situations, especially irregular migrants who, by their nature, are not subject to insertion into the labor market, based on a regular migratory status;

That by virtue of the foregoing and after the corresponding evaluation, the Government of the Republic of Panama deems it necessary to establish more effective migration controls for irregular migrants who are in the national territory,

DECREES:

Article 1. The Humanitarian Security Protection Permit is hereby created, which may be applied for by any foreigner who, at the entry into force of this Executive Decree, is irregular within the national territory and has remained in the country for a period of not less than one year. In the event that the applicant has left the country during that year, he or she may not have stayed more than sixty consecutive days outside the national territory.

The Humanitarian Security Protection Permit will be a document that will include the Work Permit issued in favor of the foreigner who avails himself of this Executive Decree, so that he or she may obtain a work permit in the national territory together with his or her residence.

Article 2. Foreigners interested in opting for the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit must meet the following requirements:

1. Power of Attorney and Request through legal representative.

2. Two passport-size photos, white background or color.

3. Complete the Single Pre-Registration of Foreigners (RUEX) or update it, depending on each case.

4. Not have current immigration procedures before the National Migration Service.

5. Complete copy of duly notarized passport.

6. Applicant's proof of address:

a. Notarized lease agreement (Copy of the tenant's ID).

b. Utility bill.

7. Criminal record certificate from their home country duly authenticated or apostilled, as the case may be.

8. Personal background affidavit.

9. Health certificate issued by a qualified professional.

10. Copy of the migrant labor registry requested from the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development.

11. In the event that the applicant is a minor, the notarized power of attorney must be granted by both parents or legal guardian, accompanied by the document that proves the relationship and the letter of responsibility duly authenticated or apostilled, as the case may be.

12. Certified or Cashier's Check from the National Bank, in favor of the National Immigration Service for an amount of $800.00 for repatriation.

13. Certified or Cashier's Check from the National Bank, in favor of the National Immigration Service for an amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for immigration service.

14. Payment of one hundred dollars ($100.00) for the card and multiple visa for the permit requested.

15. Proof of payment issued by the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00), for the Work Permit.

Article 3. The following table of costs is adopted for the processing of the application for the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit:

Transaction

Cost for immigration service

Card and Multiple Visa

Repatriation, non-refundable

National Treasure

TOTAL

Adult

$250.00

$100.00

$800.00

-

$1,150.00

Minor

-

$100.00

-

-

$100.00

Work permit

-

-

-

$100.00

$100.00

The breakdown referring to "cost for immigration service", includes the appointment request; the reception of the documentation submitted; the analysis of it; and, finally, the issuance of the resolution whether or not the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit is approved.

Article 4. The National Migration Service will check the authenticity of each document provided with the application. The mere presentation of the documents does not imply their validity, so if inconsistencies are found, it will generate criminal and administrative responsibilities for the applicant or whoever has participated in the event.

Article 5. In addition to the requirements set forth in this Executive Decree, the foreigner who opts for the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit may be subjected to an interview or evaluation by the National Migration Service and the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development, as appropriate, to determine whether or not the granting of the permit is appropriate, the cancellation or denial of the respective permit.

Article 6. The Human Security Protection Permit will be granted individually by each applicant and will contemplate the authorization by the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development for the foreigner, whose residence is approved, to immediately obtain a work permit.

Both permits will be valid for a period of two years, so that the beneficiaries over 18 years of age can reside and work in the territory of the Republic of Panama during that period, complying with the tax, labor, social security, health and legal obligations corresponding to their activity.

Article 7. Any foreigner who has obtained a Humanitarian Security Protection Permit, after the two years, may opt for a six-year extension and, once the extension period has elapsed, may opt for permanent residence, complying with the criteria established by this Executive Decree.

Article 8. Foreigners who were not admitted as refugees before the National Office for the Attention of Refugees (ONPAR), meeting the requirements to apply for the first time, in accordance with Article 2 of this Executive Decree, may opt for this permit.

Likewise, any foreigner who applied for Executive Decree No. 112 of July 13, 2023, may request the extension contemplated in this Executive Decree, complying with the requirements established in Article 9, with the exception of numeral 8, for which they must present the criminal record of their country of origin.

Article 9. Any foreigner who opts for the six-year extension must meet the following requirements:

1. Power of Attorney and Request through Legal Representative.

2. Two passport-size photos, white background or color.

3. Complete copy of duly notarized passport.

4. Applicant's proof of address:

a. Notarized lease agreement (Copy of the tenant's ID).

b. Utility bill.

5. Updated copy of the migrant labor registry requested from the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development.

6. Personal History Statement.

7. Health Certificate issued by a qualified professional.

8. Criminal and police record history, issued by the Directorate of Judicial Investigation, of the National Police of Panama, as long as you have not left the country for more than thirty days.

9. Social security form that proves that the person is contributing to the Social Security Fund or Income Tax Return with its respective proof of payment to the General Directorate of Revenue.

10. In the event that the applicant is a minor, the notarized power of attorney must be granted by both parents or legal guardian, accompanied by the document that proves the relationship and the letter of responsibility duly authenticated or apostilled, as the case may be.

11. Certified or Cashier's Check from the National Bank, in favor of the National Immigration Service for an amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for immigration service.

12. Payment of one hundred dollars ($100.00) for the card and multiple visa for the permit requested.

13. Proof of payment issued by the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00), for the Work Permit.

Transaction

Cost for immigration service

Card and Multiple Visa

National Treasure

TOTAL

Adult

$250.00

$100.00

-

$350.00

Minor

-

$100.00

-

$100.00

Work permit

-

-

$100.00

$100.00

Article 10. In the event that the foreigner does not have a collated copy of the passport, according to the terms of Article 28 of Decree Law 3 of 2008, or has a damaged or pending passport, he or she must present a certification from the corresponding Consulate that certifies his or her passports and certifies that he or she does not have the passport or that it is in process, duly authenticated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In case the passport has been lost, a report must be filed, for theft or robbery with the Directorate of Judicial Investigation, or with the Complaint Reception Center of the Public Prosecutor's Office, together with the certification of the Consulate mentioned above.

Article 11. When the applicant is a person under eighteen years of age, in order to process the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit, he or she must have the notarized authorization of both parents or the parent who has custody, proving the relationship of kinship. Upon reaching the age of majority, the applicant may opt for a work permit which must be processed before the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development, meeting the following requirements:

1. Power of Attorney and Request by Legal Representative.

2. Registration of affiliation of migrant labor.

3. Certification of Immigration Status stating that the applicant has a Humanitarian Security Protection Permit.

4. Copy of general passport and RUEX stamp.

5. Notarized copy of the residence card of the Humanitarian Security protection permit.

Article 12. The foreigner, at the time of applying for permanent residence, must provide the following requirements:

1. Power of Attorney and Request by Legal Representative.

2. Two (2) passport-size photos, white or color background.

3. Complete copy of duly notarized passport.

4. Applicant's proof of address:

a. Notarized lease agreement (Copy of the tenant's ID).

b. Utility bill.

5. Updated copy of the migrant labor registry requested from the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development.

6. Personal background affidavit.

7. Health certificate issued by a qualified professional.

8. Criminal and police record history, issued by the Directorate of Judicial Investigation, of the National Police of Panama, as long as you have not left the country for more than 30 days.

9. Social security form that proves that the person is contributing to the Social Security Fund or Income Tax Return with its respective proof of payment to the General Directorate of Revenue.

10. In the event that the applicant is a minor, the notarized power of attorney must be granted by both parents or legal guardian, the letter of responsibility, and the certification of an educational center that accredits their status as a student.

11. Certified or Cashier's Check from the National Bank, in favor of the National Immigration Service for an amount of $250.00 for immigration service.

12. Payment in the amount of $100.00 for the card and multiple visa for the permit requested.

13. Proof of payment issued by the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00), for the Work Permit.

In addition, the applicant must provide documentation that demonstrates the condition under which they will obtain their permanent residence, which may be as follows:

1. For reasons of roots. They must meet the requirements established in Title IV Permanent Resident Category; Chapter III For demographic reasons Family reunification, Section 1. Married to Panamanian and Section 2. Dependents of Permanent Residents, of Executive Decree No. 320 of February 3, 2008 or Executive Decree No. 582 of August 9, 2012. In the case of foreigners who opt for permanent residence for reasons of roots, under the condition of married to a Panamanian, they will be exempt from the payment of the repatriation deposit.

2. For work reasons. At the time of applying for permanent residence, the foreigner must have a social security card that proves that he or she contributes to the Social Security Fund or Income Tax Return with its respective proof of payment to the General Directorate of Revenue.

3. For tax reasons. The foreign person who is registered with the General Directorate of Revenue as a tax taxpayer must provide the following:

a. Notice of operation, when applicable.

b. The last two income tax returns, duly filed.

c. Good standing with the Revenue taxes.

Transaction

Cost for immigration service

Card and Multiple Visa

National Treasure

TOTAL

Adult

$250.00

$100.00

-

$350.00

Minor

-

$100.00

-

$100.00

Work Permit

-

-

$250.00

$250.00

Article 13. The person who misplaces, loses or deteriorates the card issued in accordance with this Executive Decree, must provide the following documents to request the corresponding duplicate:

1. Original or copy authenticated by the National Migration Service of the resolution granting the provisional or definitive permit with its respective notification stamp.

2. Passport with its registration stamp or filiation. If they have lost the original passport, they must present a provisional passport.

3. Copy of the complaint filed with the complaint reception center for the loss of the document.

4. Contribution for the damaged document if applicable.

The costs for the duplicate will be as follows:

First time

Second time

Third time

$100.00

$200.00

$300.00

Article 14. The amounts collected for immigration services will be used for social assistance and security. Ninety percent (90%) will be assigned to the Ministry of the Presidency and the remaining ten percent (10%) will be allocated to the Special Fund for the Development of Human Resources of the National Migration Service. The amounts collected as a contribution to the Repatriation Deposit referred to in this Executive Decree shall be allocated to the Trust Fund of the National Migration Service.

As for the income from the Work Permit that corresponds to the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development, seventy percent (70%) will be assigned to the Ministry of the Presidency and thirty percent (30%) of the money collected from this process will be allocated to the Special Operational Fund of the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development.

Article 15. The application for the Humanitarian Security Protection Permit will be valid for one year from its promulgation in the official gazette.

Article 16. This Executive Decree shall enter into force upon its promulgation.

LEGAL BASIS: Decree-Law 3 of February 22, 2008; Executive Decree No. 320 of August 8, 2008 and its amendments.

COMMUNICATE AND COMPLY.

Given in Panama City on the eleventh (11th) day of March, two thousand and twenty-five (2025).

JOSÉ RAÚL MULINO QUINTERO

President of the Republic

FRANK ALEXIS ABREGO

Minister of Public Security


28
eom

29
Science, Culture, & Humanities / Elon says read these nine books
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:07:56 PM »
1. Human Compatible by Stuart Russell.
Human Compatible explains why the creation of artificial intelligence could be humanity’s final act, a topic that Musk has been very vocal about.
2. Zero to One by Peter Thiel with Blake Masters.
Zero to One explores how companies can better predict the future and take action to ensure that their startup is a success.
3. Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway.
This book examines some of the world’s foremost scientific debates on the environment, smoking, and nuclear weapons
4. Life 3.0 by Max Tegmark
In this work, MIT professor Max Tegmark writes about keeping artificial intelligence beneficial for human life and ensuring technological progress remains aligned with humanity’s goals for the future
5. The Big Picture by Sean M. Carroll
The Big Picture is an ambitious look at the world as we know it and how we can use scientific thinking to make sense of most of it.
6. Lying by Sam Harris
Lying explains why the act of telling lies is so dangerous. And that means all lies, from the tiny lies that people tell on a daily basis to the massive lies sometimes told on the world stage.
7. Superintelligence by Nick Bostrom
The book in Elon Musk’s reading list makes a daring inquiry into what would happen if computational intelligence surpassed human intelligence
8. The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith
profoundly influential work in the realm of economics. It is a profoundly influential work in the study of economics and examines precisely how nations become wealthy.
9. Radical Candour by Kim Scott
He is a fan of the feedback loop, stating in an interview that, “it’s very important to have a feedback loop, where you’re constantly thinking about what you’ve done and how you could be doing it better.”
Radical Candour by Kim Scott serves as a valuable roadmap for leaders seeking to build strong relationships with their employees.

30
Politics & Religion / DIME
« on: March 14, 2025, 02:47:14 PM »
While the U.S. military tends to view the instruments of power (IOPs) strictly through the lens of the diplomatic, informational, military, and economic (DIME) framework, it is increasingly imperative to consider additional IOPs such as finance, intelligence, and law enforcement (FIL).

https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2106566/putting-the-fil-into-dime-growing-joint-understanding-of-the-instruments-of-pow/


https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA561308.pdf

The use of force alone is not enough to break the will of enemies and
to advance the interests of the United States. War must include the use of all elements
of national power – diplomacy, information, military, and economics (DIME). Indeed,
effective integration of national power may prevent war in the first place. 
The purpose of this paper is to develop a strategic theory and framework that
address the nature and conduct of war in the twenty-first century: the integration of
DIME.


31
Politics & Religion / Trump asks for military plan for Panama
« on: March 14, 2025, 02:39:34 PM »
second

 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/trump-signals-potential-military-action-to-reclaim-panama-canal-requests-coordinated-plan/

Trump Signals Potential Military Action To Reclaim Panama Canal, Requests Coordinated Plan

(L) U.S. President Donald Trump appears during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images) / (R) View of the Port of Balboa, managed by CK Hutchison Holdings, located at the entrance to the Panama Canal in Panama City, on March 12, 2025. (Photo by MARTIN BERNETTI/AFP via Getty Images)
OAN Staff Brooke Mallory
11:55 PM – Friday, March 14, 2025

According to reports, President Donald Trump has instructed the U.S. military to devise a range of strategies for retaking the Panama Canal, in an effort to dissuade communist China from continuing conducting operations in the region.

Advertisement
The United States Southern Command is in the works of leading the future endeavor, according to NBC News, reportedly involving the U.S. military retaking the Panama Canal, if need be, — though preferably collaborating with Panamanian security forces.

According to officials, the efforts of the U.S. military is contingent on Panama’s compliance with American requests. The U.S. military will reportedly not become involved if Panamanian officials comply.

Commander of United States Southern Command, Admiral Alvin Holsey “presented draft strategies to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth this week,” the report stated.

According to officials, the United States regaining control is not impossible, but it would most likely only occur if Trump’s objective of regaining the canal, which the U.S. has funded and constructed, was met by an increased American military presence.

Ultimately, the Trump administration is looking to strengthen American military forces in Panama in order to reduce the ongoing Chinese influence in the region. He has often stated that it is not right for China to be taking advantage of the canal, being American made, as China is the United States’ greatest economic threat.

However, Panama and China deny that there is any foreign meddling in regard to the 50-mile canal, whose neutrality is “established” in Panama’s Constitution. Meanwhile, the U.S. has also been accused by Chinese authorities of employing “coercion” to compel Panamanian officials to obstruct Chinese initiatives.

“It was given away by the Carter administration for $1, but that agreement has been violated very severely,” Trump explained, during his address to Congress last week. “We didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.”

A segment of the report reads: “Privately, Trump has told his advisers that he sees a U.S. military presence in Panama and on the canal itself as critical to that effort, the U.S. officials said. Trump has also made it clear that he wants U.S. service members to be visible in the canal zone as a show of force.

Trump administration officials have also argued that China has too large of a presence near the canal. In the event of a conflict, Beijing could shut down the canal to American shipping — including military ships.

China is “playing the long game” with its economic development projects around the world, which it exploits to further its goals, according to a statement made last year before the House Armed Services Committee by Gen. Laura Richardson, who was the head of the United States Southern Command at the time.

“The PRC [People’s Republic of China] messages its investments as peaceful, but in fact, many serve as points of future multi-domain access for the PLA [People’s Liberation Army] and strategic naval chokepoints,” she said. “In Panama, PRC-controlled State-Owned Enterprises, SOEs, continue to bid on projects related to the Panama Canal — a global strategic chokepoint.”

34
Politics & Religion / FO: Anarchist Blog with Arson Tips for Teslas
« on: March 14, 2025, 12:15:25 PM »
(7) ANARCHIST BLOG SHARES ARSON TIPS FOR TESLAS: A revolutionary anarchist blog posted a call to action and shared tips on how to conduct arson attacks against Tesla vehicles.

The post covered basic security tips like masking one’s identity for the vehicle’s security cameras and ensuring fingerprints and DNA aren’t left at the scene of the crime.

Why It Matters: Arson has become a routine tactic for the revolutionary left due to the ease of action and relatively low risk. Placing an incendiary device on a tire and lighting it gives time for the arsonist to make distance before the lit fire spreads to the tire, which virtually ensures the fire will engulf the vehicle. Absent fingerprints or DNA, the arsonist is unlikely to be identified and arrested. These are the kinds of “confidence building” attacks that historically lead to larger forms of direct action. Many urban and suburban areas are target-rich environments, and the attacks are recognizably linked to the Trump Resistance and anti-Musk movement. Expect sporadic arsons to continue. - M.S.

Edited to add:

(9) ANARCHISTS PLAN 15 MARCH “DAY AGAINST POLICE”: Anarchists based in the greater Seattle, Washington-area are planning an International Day Against Police on 15 March.

According to a blog post, the theme is “social defense and offense against police,” and features a fundraiser for prisoners, education, and de-arrest training.

Why It Matters: Seattle and Portland remain hotbeds for revolutionary and violent anarchist activity, although overall activity is much lower than in 2016-2021. De-arrest training involves teaching militants how to break up police arrests by physically blocking and sometimes pulling detainees away from police custody. These types of training events occur in large cities like Seattle and New York, although I don’t recall having seen any de-arrest attempts this year. Still, the training will support direct action plans against federal, state, and in some cases local police involved in immigration enforcement. - M.S.

35
Science, Culture, & Humanities / WT: The fight to shut down DOE
« on: March 14, 2025, 06:13:06 AM »
EDUCATION

State AGs sue over plans to gut the Education Department

By Valerie Richardson THE WASHINGTON TIMES

A coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general sued Thursday to block the Trump administration from gutting the Department of Education, arguing that Congress created the Cabinet-level agency and only Congress may abolish it.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts came two days after Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced that the department’s staff would be cut by about 2,183 employees for a 50% reduction in force.

New York Attorney General Letitia James called the staffing cuts “reckless and illegal.”

“Today I am taking action to stop the madness and protect our schools and the students who depend on them,” she said in a Thursday press release.

President Trump campaigned on a promise to eliminate the department, calling it “a big con job.” The attorneys general accused him of exceeding his authority.

“The Department is an executive agency authorized by Congress, with numerous different laws creating its various programs and funding streams,” said the release. “The coalition’s lawsuit asserts that the executive branch does not have the legal authority to unilaterally incapacitate or dismantle it without an act of Congress.”

The department began operations in 1980 after President Carter signed into law the Department of Education Organization Act. Critics blasted the moveas a sop by the president to the National Education Association in exchange for its campaign endorsement.

Republicans have sought to eliminate the department since President Reagan took office in 1981, but Mr. Trump’s 50% reduction in force represents the most dramatic step in that direction.

Republicans argue that the $268 billion department is inefficient, bloated and unnecessary, given that states and local governments are in charge of building and funding schools. Democrats counter that the department provides critical resources.

“This administration may claim to be stopping waste and fraud, but it is clear that their only mission is to take away the necessary services, resources, and funding that students and their families need,” Ms. James said in a Thursday statement. “Firing half of the Department of Education’s workforce will hurt students throughout New York and the nation, especially lowincome students and those with disabilities who rely on federal funding.”

Programs run by the department serve “nearly 18,200 school districts and over 50 million K-12 students attending roughly 98,000 public schools and 32,000 private schools,” said the Democrats in a statement.

School districts in New York received $6.17 billion, or $2,438 per student, from the department in Fiscal Year 2024. Republicans argue that the funding comes with strings, such as requiring schools to adopt diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

The department said Tuesday that it will continue to fulfill its statutory obligations despite the staffing cuts, including student loans, Pell Grants, funding for special-needs students, grantmaking and formula funding, but the Democrats were leery.

“The administration’s layoff is so massive that ED will be incapacitated and unable to perform essential functions,” said the Democratic attorneys general in a press release.

The Democratic attorneys general joining Ms. James represent the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia

36
Politics & Religion / WT:
« on: March 14, 2025, 05:59:43 AM »


Trump vs. deep state: Tiny agency, huge battle over aid

Intrigue of legal thriller develops at foundation

By Stephen Dinan THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The U.S. African Development Foundation, one of the smallest agencies in the federal government, has become a major battlefield in the guerrilla warfare between the Trump administration and resisters deep inside the bureaucracy.

The case has all the intrigue of a legal thriller novel. President Trump sends his Department of Government Efficiency team to the foundation’s headquarters, just north of the White House, only to find employees blocking them at the door.

Mr. Trump’s team then threatened to bring in the U.S. Marshals.

With elements reminiscent of medieval Catholic Church intrigue, two men claim power at the agency.

For now, the president’s team has come out on top, with U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon refusing to order the president to recognize Ward Brehm, the man picked by the Trump opponents to be president of the USADF. He said Mr. Brehm hadn’t met the burden of winning a temporary restraining order.

“Unfortunately, for Brehm, based on the record before me, I cannot find that he satisfies the ‘high standard for irreparable injury,’” Judge Leon wrote.

Still, Mr. Brehm told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune he believes he remains in charge anyway.

The case is part of a vast legal battle over Mr. Trump’s aggressive takeover of the federal bureaucracy.

Foreign aid programs have been a particular target for Mr. Trump, who, in a Feb. 19 executive order, called for the wind-down, as much as legally possible, of the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and USADF.

It was an obvious target for Mr. Trump and his budget-cutting DOGE because of its nexus to foreign aid programs, which Mr. Trump is skeptical of, and because an inspector general slammed it last year for taking a relaxed approach to fraud with taxpayer money.

With a budget of $45 million, the agency said it doled out $16.6 million in agriculture grants, $7.4 million in energy grants and $4.2 million in youth and women entrepreneurship grants last year.

The two sides tell different stories in their court documents, but piecing it all together, it appears that soon after Mr. Trump’s executive order, a DOGE staffer contacted the foundation and asked for access to its computers to do some systems checks.

The next day, a DOGE team showed up and said it was there to slim down the agency by ousting most personnel and cutting the work down to one or two grants. Foundation staffers refused, saying the systems were private. Mr. Trump’s DOGE team threatened to have the foundation’s board fired.

On Feb. 24, short emails from the White House Office of Presidential Personnel fired four board members, including Mr. Brehm and former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, the foundation chair. On Feb. 26, one last remaining board member was fired.

Two days later, Mr. Trump appointed Pete Marocco, the State Department official now in charge of foreign aid programs, as the sole board member and acting chairman.

The problem, according to the original board, is that they never got the emails firing them. They said the White House seemed to guess at the correct addresses and got them wrong. They held a meeting on March 3, without Mr. Marocco, where they deemed Mr. Marocco’s appointment illegal and designated Mr. Brehm as the foundation’s president.

They then held their regular meeting on March 4, again without Mr. Marocco, who said he would take control the following day.

When he did show up on March 5, the foundation staff blocked his access, and he reportedly said he would call the U.S. Marshals or Secret Service to force entry.

The matter then hit the courts. In a lawsuit filled with charges of “bullying” and “strong-arm” tactics, Mr. Brehm, a George W. Bush appointee who had been on the board since 2008, demanded to be recognized as the rightful head.

He said if Mr. Trump’s team is allowed to take control, even briefly, it would ruin the agency beyond repair.

Mr. Trump’s attorneys said the president has clear firing powers and the law does not require him to give a reason.

In his brief ruling this week, Judge Leon cast doubt on all sides.

He expressed skepticism that Mr. Trump has followed the Constitution in installing his pick to the board. He said federal law doesn’t appear to allow temporary appointments such as Mr. Marocco’s.

If he eventually decides that way, Judge Leon said the remedy will be reinstating Mr. Brehm with back pay. It doesn’t rise to the level of deserving a restraining order immediately putting him back on the job.

The judge said what Mr. Brehm is doing is complaining that Mr. Trump is tilting the agency away from how Mr. Brehm and the other old board members wanted to run things.

“Congress has defined the agency’s minimum level of functioning already, yet Brehm is asking the court to define what it means for the agency to be fulfilling its mission,” Judge Leon wrote. “The court would be guessing here and would be substituting Brehm’s judgment for that of Congress. This I will not do,” he said.

In a statement, Mr. Brehm said he was “disappointed” with the ruling but “encouraged by the remaining options presented to us.”

“USADF continues to comply with its statutory obligations, and we are determined to do everything we can to ensure the long-term viability of this wonderful agency and its incredible staff that has effectively and faithfully served those among the poor in Africa on behalf of the people of America,” he said.

The Washington Times reached out to Ms. Moseley Braun for this report

37
Michael Brewer on FB:

Ok, folks - let's talk about it.  Social Security and why imminent change is needed.  I had a discussion with ChatGPT, and I bounced that off of Grok today.  What follows is a version of those two conversations which combines the outputs to describe the main points.  I encourage you to take these prompts and run a similar exercise.  It helps take the politics out of the issue and get to the real meat of the problem.  As you read this exchange, I'd like to ask you a favor.  Consider which of the courses of action advisable here are currently being undertaken, and who is resisting them.  It's telling.

Me:
I'd like to talk to you about Social Security and its pending insolvency.  By all expert accounts, Social Security in its present form is unsustainable.  Changes to the program and to the laws that govern it have, in past decades, allowed Congress to borrow from Social Security, meaning it now functions in part as an unfunded liability.  Is this correct?

AI said:
Yes, that's correct. Social Security’s financial issues stem from several factors, including demographic shifts, changes in workforce participation, and legislative decisions that allowed the federal government to use surplus Social Security funds for general government expenses.

Key Issues with Social Security’s Sustainability:

Demographics & Funding Mechanism – Social Security operates as a pay-as-you-go system, meaning current workers’ payroll taxes fund retirees' benefits. The worker-to-beneficiary ratio has declined dramatically over the decades due to lower birth rates and longer life expectancy. In 1960, there were roughly 5 workers per retiree, but today that number is closer to 2.8 workers per retiree and is projected to drop further.

Borrowing from the Trust Fund – The Social Security Trust Fund (composed of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Disability Insurance Trust Fund) had accumulated surpluses for years. However, due to laws passed in previous decades—particularly the 1983 Social Security Amendments—the government began investing these surpluses in special-issue Treasury bonds. While these bonds are backed by the U.S. government, they represent IOUs rather than cash reserves, meaning that to pay out benefits, the government must redeem these bonds by either raising taxes, borrowing more, or cutting spending elsewhere.

Becoming an Unfunded Liability – Because of these IOUs, Social Security obligations increasingly resemble an unfunded liability—meaning future payouts exceed expected revenues. According to the Social Security Trustees Report, the program will deplete its trust fund reserves by 2034, at which point benefits would have to be reduced by about 20-25% unless Congress enacts changes.

Me:
Under these projections, that means changes to the program are imminently necessary, not just "nice to have," is that correct?

AI said:
Yes, that is absolutely correct. Changes to Social Security are not just a "nice to have" but a necessity if the program is to continue functioning at its current benefit levels.

Why Action Is Urgent
Trust Fund Depletion by 2034 – According to the Social Security Trustees Report, the program’s combined trust funds (Old-Age and Survivors Insurance + Disability Insurance) will be exhausted by 2034. At that point, the system would only be able to pay out what it collects in real time from payroll taxes—about 77-80% of scheduled benefits. That means an automatic 20-25% benefit cut unless changes are made.

Delaying Action Increases the Pain – The longer Congress waits to act, the more drastic the required measures will become. For example:

A gradual increase in the payroll tax today could close the funding gap more painlessly than a sudden, much larger tax hike later.

A modest increase in the retirement age now would be less disruptive than a sudden, steep increase later.

Minor benefit adjustments today would be preferable to deep, across-the-board cuts in the future.
Interest Payments & Federal Debt Implications – Because the trust fund holds Treasury bonds, redeeming them will require the federal government to either:

Raise taxes
Cut spending elsewhere

Borrow more money (increasing the national debt) This makes Social Security’s insolvency a broader fiscal issue, not just a retiree issue.

Me:
Assuming that funding Social Security is a priority for America and that allowing the program to become insolvent is unacceptable, is it advisable then, to take an approach that includes:

1. Drastic cuts to federal spending, including workforce reductions, elimination of waste, fraud, abuse, redundancy, and inefficiencies, and streamlining and modernizing the Federal Government with an eye toward efficiency

2. Government-managed investment funds or semi-privatization of investments to move closer to market-rate returns rather than the historic 1% - 2% returns of the Social Security program based on bonds

3. Increased transparency and market discipline within the government-managed funds overall, and

4. Ending the policy of being able to borrow from Social Security to pay other obligations?

AI said:
Yes, that approach would likely be the most fiscally responsible and politically viable way to stabilize Social Security while minimizing economic disruption. Let’s break down each component and its advisability, feasibility, and potential impact.

1. Drastic Cuts to Federal Spending & Efficiency Improvements
✅ Advisable: Yes, reducing unnecessary government expenditures would help free up resources to cover Social Security's obligations without increasing taxes or borrowing.

📌 Key Areas to Cut or Reform:
Workforce Reductions & Streamlining – The federal workforce is massive, and some departments have redundancies that could be consolidated without harming essential services.

Eliminating Waste, Fraud, & Abuse – Studies have shown billions in improper payments across Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security disability. Better oversight could recover substantial funds.
Reducing Redundancies in Federal Programs – There are multiple overlapping programs in areas such as education, welfare, and defense contracting. Merging or streamlining them could generate savings.
Federal Agency Modernization – Upgrading IT infrastructure and eliminating bureaucratic inefficiencies could save money long-term.

📉 Impact: Cutting federal spending could slow the growth of the national debt while freeing up funds for Social Security. However, deep cuts alone wouldn’t fully close the Social Security gap and could face political resistance.

2. Government-Managed Investment Funds or Semi-Privatization for Higher Returns
✅ Advisable: Yes, if implemented responsibly. Current Social Security investments in low-yield Treasury bonds limit the program's financial sustainability. Diversifying investments into equities and other assets could significantly boost returns.

📌 Options for Market-Based Investments:
Allowing a portion of Social Security contributions to be privately invested (like a 401(k), with government oversight).

A government-managed investment fund (like many state pension funds) that places a percentage of the trust fund in higher-yield assets while maintaining safety measures.

📈 Impact: If Social Security investments had historically tracked market rates, the trust fund would be significantly larger today. Even a modest shift toward higher-return investments could help extend solvency.

3. Increased Transparency & Market Discipline in Government Funds
✅ Advisable: Yes. Transparency ensures public trust, prevents mismanagement, and creates accountability for political leaders overseeing these investments.

📌 Ways to Achieve This:
Independent Oversight Board – A non-partisan entity could oversee Social Security investments to ensure sound financial decisions.

Public Disclosure Requirements – Just as private funds must disclose investment performance, the government should provide real-time transparency on fund management.

Strict Fiduciary Rules – Fund managers should be legally required to act in the best financial interest of beneficiaries, reducing opportunities for political interference.

📉 Impact: Greater transparency would prevent Social Security funds from being used as a slush fund for non-retirement spending and boost public confidence in reforms.

4. Ending the Practice of Borrowing from Social Security
✅ Advisable: Absolutely. One of the biggest factors in Social Security’s current insolvency crisis is that past surpluses were not saved or invested but spent elsewhere.

📌 Key Fix:
A "Lockbox" Approach – A legally enforceable mechanism ensuring that payroll tax revenues only fund Social Security benefits (or permissible investments).

Balanced Budget Requirements – Congress could be forced to fund other programs separately, preventing future borrowing from Social Security.

📉 Impact: If this policy had been in place decades ago, Social Security wouldn’t be facing a funding crisis today. Moving forward, it would ensure the program operates sustainably without needing emergency taxpayer bailouts.

39
Politics & Religion / FO: Anarchist blog arson tips for Teslas
« on: March 13, 2025, 03:56:01 PM »


(7) ANARCHIST BLOG SHARES ARSON TIPS FOR TESLAS: A revolutionary anarchist blog posted a call to action and shared tips on how to conduct arson attacks against Tesla vehicles.

The post covered basic security tips like masking one’s identity for the vehicle’s security cameras and ensuring fingerprints and DNA aren’t left at the scene of the crime.

Why It Matters: Arson has become a routine tactic for the revolutionary left due to the ease of action and relatively low risk. Placing an incendiary device on a tire and lighting it gives time for the arsonist to make distance before the lit fire spreads to the tire, which virtually ensures the fire will engulf the vehicle. Absent fingerprints or DNA, the arsonist is unlikely to be identified and arrested. These are the kinds of “confidence building” attacks that historically lead to larger forms of direct action. Many urban and suburban areas are target-rich environments, and the attacks are recognizably linked to the Trump Resistance and anti-Musk movement. Expect sporadic arsons to continue. - M.S.

40
Science, Culture, & Humanities / FO: $20B to be invested in grid!
« on: March 13, 2025, 03:54:33 PM »


(6) ENERGY COMPANY PLANS $20B U.S. GRID INVESTMENT: Avangrid, an energy company and subsidiary of Iberdrola SA, said it plans to invest $20 billion in U.S. electric grid infrastructure through 2030 after executives met with Trump officials this week. Avangrid said the investment will address growing energy demand by modernizing and expanding electric infrastructure, including new generation.

41


(2) JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP ORDER ON LAW FIRMS: A Seattle, WA federal judge blocked the Trump administration from enforcing an executive order blocking law firm Perkins Coie from interacting with federal agencies or entering federal buildings. Perkins Coie said the executive order will put the law firm out of business.

47
Nice datum.

I noticed it seems to be moving above 34.

Decrypto is reporting that BTC is still reporting outflow of funds and ETH is doing even worse.  Is there a point at which this becomes a self sustaining panic that wipes out all our gains?


48
Politics & Religion / And just who is Khalil?
« on: March 13, 2025, 02:55:39 PM »
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4303925/posts

You Know That Hamas-Supporting Student Trump Is Deporting? He Has British Security Clearance !
Hotair ^ | 03/12/2025 | David Strom
Posted on 3/13/2025, 12:20:27 AM by SeekAndFind

WTH, Great Britain?

President Trump is working to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate student who has been an organizer of pro-Hamas rallies and who has been committing crimes, recruiting others to commit crimes, and illegally supporting a terrorist organization as an alien. John has been doing yeoman's work covering this case.

Immigration law is explicit about the last: you may not have, may not now, nor may you at any point as a visa or green card holder support terrorists. It is black letter law.

The Left is going crazy, because, well, the Left. If it is bad, they support it.

But imagine my surprise to learn that he is also associated with British intelligence and their their foreign policy establishment, and has been for years.

So then the question becomes “ why did @10DowningStreet have a MI6 spy in America organizing/leading violent antisemitic riots and destabilizing universities/cities?”

Sounds like they may want Revolutionary War 2.0.— JW (@C130GuyBNA) March 12, 2025

Uh, wut? Say again? He has been key to their "soft power" initiatives, which sure sounds like liaising with terrorists in this case.

The White House triumphally posted Trump's statement and an image of Khalil on X on Monday, accompanied with the words "SHALOM, MAHMOUD" and the accusation that he "led activities aligned to Hamas".

Khalil graduated with a master’s degree from Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs in December.

He was one of the main negotiators for students during the pro-Palestine campus encampment in the spring of 2024.

However, MEE has found that he previously worked as a programme manager at the Syria Office in the British embassy in Beirut from 2018 t0 2022.

Online records reviewed by MEE show that Khalil worked as a local manager for the Syria Chevening Program, a prestigious UK government international scholarship scheme, as well as for the Conflict, Stability, and Security Fund.

'Loved by his colleagues'
Former British diplomat Andrew Waller, who was a policy advisor at the Syria Office while Khalil worked there, told MEE that the US government's depiction of Khalil was false and defamatory.

"He went through a vetting process to get the job and was cleared to work on sensitive issues for the British government," Waller said

"It's outright defamation what Trump has done. Mahmoud is an extremely kind and conscientious person and he was loved by his colleagues at the Syria Office," he added.

Well, then, he MUST be a good guy, even if he is recruiting for US domestic terrorist-supporting organizations. He did outreach in SYRIA, a place filled with the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I've ever known in my life.

For God's sake, Britain, how debased can a country be.

Mahmoud Khalil’s group wants to eradicate Western Civilization & foment unrest in the United States. President Trump & @SecRubio are well within their legal rights to deport this radical. We are either going to stand up or become Europe. I’m 100% behind the President. pic.twitter.com/0shUR407pr— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) March 11, 2025

Khalil has been shouting to the world that he wants to "eradicate Western Civilization" and that revolutionary violence is the way to do so. He has led occupations of buildings on Columbia's campus, been engaged in what amounts to violence used to deprive others of their civil rights, and preaches support for terrorist violence.

But his colleagues in the British embassy in Syria loved him. His job, supposedly, was to increase Britain's "soft power," and unless that means promoting violence and revolution, he was doing a pretty crappy job of it. It sounds more like he was recruiting terrorists to get student visas to Western countries.

The Brits are so determined to import Muslims who are promoting violence and Sharia law in their own country that Khalil is their idea of an ideal ambassador to the Syrian community. Syria has been in the midst of a horrific civil war, is filled with ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists, and is probably not the best place to be recruiting the "best and the brightest."

The Chevening scholarship, which is funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), describes its mission as being to "support UK foreign policy priorities and achieve FCDO objectives by creating lasting positive relationships with future leaders, influencers, and decision-makers".

Waller described it as a "flagship UK soft power policy".

"It brings the brightest students from around the world to UK universities. Mahmoud ran its Syria programme and interviewed hundreds, if not thousands, of applicants on behalf of the British government."

Khalil was also a "local staff political officer", responsible for providing the "contextual understanding and linguistic skills to translate meetings," Waller recalled.

"It's really interesting. Less than two weeks ago JD Vance is lecturing Keir Starmer about free speech, and then the US goes and kidnaps Mahmoud Khalil for organising student protests."

Tricia McLaughlin, spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), told MEE on Monday that Khalil's arrest was "in support of President Trump’s executive orders prohibiting anti-Semitism".

"Khalil led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation."

It's not like it's disputable that Khalil has done these things. It's not a case of mistaken identity. We have video of Khalil calling for "armed resistance" against Western countries, but the Brits just love the guy and complain that he was "kidnapped."

There is a false controversy surrounding the arrest and hopefully deportation of Mahmoud Khalil. I’m going to put it to bed. Khalil’s deportation has nothing to do with your free speech. Khalil is facing deportation because of his conduct, including, allegedly, organizing a… pic.twitter.com/MXFcSuaQlU— Brooke Goldstein (@GoldsteinBrooke) March 12, 2025

There is a false controversy surrounding the arrest and hopefully deportation of Mahmoud Khalil. I’m going to put it to bed.  Khalil’s deportation has nothing to do with your free speech. Khalil is facing deportation because of his conduct, including, allegedly, organizing a violent takeover of US campuses with pro-terror elements, conspiring to commit civil rights violations and trespass, building takeovers — this is criminal activity that endangers public safety, and of course endorsing and espousing terrorist activity in contravention of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

I used to love our friends in the Anglosphere, and still love the IDEA of the Anglosphere and the values that the Scottish Enlightenment spread throughout the world.

Yes. Because nothing says anti-war like chanting for a “global intifada.” https://t.co/Agh4J5zA9P— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) March 12, 2025

But look at what our fellow English speakers have done with themselves. They are destroying freedom, aligning with Islamists who are determined to destroy our societies, and sacrificing their citizens to rape gangs and criminals.

“We’ve tried armed resistance, which is legitimate under international law, but Israel calls it terrorism”
-Mahmoud Khalil

At a session where he indoctrinates students to join the pro terror group CUAD on campus

There shld be no more debate whether Khalil himself supports Hamas pic.twitter.com/EdUd0w7w5L— David lederer (@Davidlederer6) March 11, 2025

If this is what amounts to Britain's "soft power," and this is who they give security clearances to, the UK is farther gone than I imagined.

It's not just the British, though. The entire left-wing establishment and all the prominent Democrats have rushed to defend Khalil and oppose his deportation. It is their cause du jour.

“Let terror-supporting foreign nationals who have violated the terms of their green card stay in the country or you don’t support free speech!”

Nah, bro. We aren’t doing that. Sorry. Accuse us of whatever you want. https://t.co/1HMGqV0IUB— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) March 11, 2025

The Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats are fully embracing him too.

Free Mahmoud Khalil. pic.twitter.com/o9AkeXaYyh— Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸 (🦋 now on bsky) (@JudiciaryDems) March 10, 2025

Antisemitic much? Anti-American? Anti-Western?

You betcha. That is our transnational elite for you.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 1337