Show Posts
151
Politics & Religion / F 35 with tactical nucs but a real boondoggle
« on: April 01, 2024, 07:59:08 AM »
but with design problems
single engine no durable
too much heat emitted
high cost overruns - not reliable or durable
this sums it up:
"“The F-35 has pretty good range for a single-engine fighter. It is stealth, and so you could obviously get closer to Russian air space before being effectively targeted than you could, let’s say, with an F-15,” noting that with 600 to 700 F-35s in U.S. and allied air forces, “we have hundreds of them, and at any given time, some of them are probably capable of flying.”
You have to be kidding me!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/americas-controversial-stealth-fighter-jet-can-now-carry-nukes-5606846?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2024-04-01&src_cmp=mb-2024-04-01&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYuw4IktV6djJ5LwB8GZWBu1axachNqyXsy29F2zjSh8%3D
single engine no durable
too much heat emitted
high cost overruns - not reliable or durable
this sums it up:
"“The F-35 has pretty good range for a single-engine fighter. It is stealth, and so you could obviously get closer to Russian air space before being effectively targeted than you could, let’s say, with an F-15,” noting that with 600 to 700 F-35s in U.S. and allied air forces, “we have hundreds of them, and at any given time, some of them are probably capable of flying.”
You have to be kidding me!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/americas-controversial-stealth-fighter-jet-can-now-carry-nukes-5606846?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2024-04-01&src_cmp=mb-2024-04-01&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYuw4IktV6djJ5LwB8GZWBu1axachNqyXsy29F2zjSh8%3D
