Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ppulatie

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 23
101
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 27, 2020, 09:21:19 AM »
Rasmussen Nevada poll has Biden leading by +1 only.  If things hold, it is now Trump at 622 Electoral Votes.

102
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 26, 2020, 12:24:00 PM »
GDP model really means little under the Covid mess.  Is an outdated model anyway.

Still have Trump at 316 Electoral Votes right now with 3-4 states that could flip to him from Biden, and another 2 that could flip from him to Biden. 

Still a solid lead.

103
The 4th Turning has as one feature a Total Debt Reset. Whether by Default or some other reason.  This time, it will be much more severe than ever before. But that is the nature of a 4th Turning.

Personally, after talking with people who worked in the FDIC many years ago, the Debt Reset one the dollar is likely to be "changing the color of the ink."  Blueback instead of Greenback. But with everything else going on over the next decade, it will be just one more "crisis" thrown into the bucket.

104
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 25, 2020, 10:17:13 AM »
Thanks!  As I get time, aka feel good and write, will be around.  (Doing good now, but the tiredness really gets to me each day.)

105
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 25, 2020, 09:51:10 AM »
FYI, the places I write for or comment on are revealing an "undercurrent" of people who either will not tell pollsters the truth on who they are voting for, or else have plenty of liberal relatives who voted in 16 for Hillary and are now changing to Trump.

Polls are not picking up this undercurrent.

106
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 25, 2020, 07:21:44 AM »
If they have 307 tons of fraudulent ballots, we have already lost. So I am moving to a free country. Maybe Liberia.

No, seriously, I think the issue is being overblown.  And even if Michigan and Penn can be won that way, there is still plenty of cushion of EV votes.

Of course, if Biden does win through outride fraud, CW 2 is on, just like if Trump wins no matter what.

107
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: September 24, 2020, 05:20:31 PM »
I have Trump at 307 electoral votes now. Have taken poll results and adjusted to bias to get there.

Now, it appears that Virginia and Minnesota may both be in play for Trump as well.

Gigi concurs with my numbers.

108
Question:

Son is looking to upgrade the 9mm's that we have. Looking for a Beretta 9mm.  Online stores all are out of stock. Has tried calling sporting goods stores and are out of stock as well.

Anyone know of a place he can buy one and get shipped to CA licensed dealer?

Thanks.

109
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: June 12, 2020, 05:05:55 PM »
My point is that if Floyd was suffering from excited delirium, then he would have more than likely died anyway. Not excusing the cop, but the outcome might have been the same either way.

Pulling the weapon might be another indication of excited delirium. Or that Floyd was resisting arrest because he knew if arrested again for the counterfeit bill and with drugs in his system, he was going away for a lot longer that 5 years.

110
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: June 12, 2020, 10:59:09 AM »
Mentioning Health Care above, here is today's article.

THE COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE

As most of the regular readers here know, I have been battling “The Beast” (Prostate Cancer) for about four years now.  The treatments for the Beast are all medication based, which is hormonal therapy. The good news is that I have responded well to such treatments.

In America today, there is an ongoing controversy about Big Pharma, medicine costs and of course, Medicare Plan D or other insurance paying for the cost of medical treatments. I thought that it would be appropriate to at least bring to light the costs of what my own treatments are costing to illustrate just how bad a mess things are when treating chronic diseases.  (I am at the  phase now where my CA is considered “chronic.”)

I received a bill this week for Medical Claims processed between Feb 14 and Mar 29, 2020. The bill covers just a portion of what it is taking to keep me alive. Here is what has been paid.

Feb 14 –  Zometa Injection and other services       $ 1,113

Feb 28 – Xtandi                                                     $11,569

Feb 25 –  Heart Stress Test                                    $ 1,274

Mar 13 – Zometa and Lupron Injections                $ 7,105

Mar 28 – Xtandi                                                     $11,569

Apr 28 –  Xtandi                                                     $11,569

May  8 – Zometa Injection                                    $     615

May 28 – Xtandi                                                    $11,569

The total costs for the 4 month period is $56,373.

(Xtandi is a daily dose by pill, 4 per day, each pill costing $100. Lupron is a quarterly injection. Zometa was a monthly injection delivered by IV, but goes quarterly now.)

What is frightening about this number is that it does not include other 3rd party payments, or other procedures that might be incurred throughout the year, things necessary to evaluate progress and keep me healthy like CT scans, colonoscopy, x-rays and other procedures.

My medical costs per year will run between $175k and $200k.  If something special arises, then the cost goes up significantly, especially if it requires a hospital stay.

Utilizing a Cost/Benefit Analysis, the truth is that with what I contribute to society in my retirement years, I do not warrant the costs associated with keeping me alive.

This is truly scary stuff, looking at the numbers from a Cost/Benefit Analysis perspective. It is no wonder that ObamaCare envisioned Death Panels. I must be truly grateful that the Panels were not fully instituted.

The question arises as to what happens in the future? Will people in the same position as I am be left to die when financial strains get worse? Can medical costs be gotten under control so as to relieve financial pressures on the insurance system? The health care system?

I don’t know the answers. All I know is that I am relieved and grateful that I am still around to annoy Rubbish, Bruno and the other Moderators with my Cuckservative views.

Have a Great Day and give this some thought when you have time.  And remember…..

LIFE IS GOOD!!!  (As long as you wake up each morning and are able to get out of bed.)

111
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: June 12, 2020, 10:56:00 AM »
Had not heard about the rumor. And unless I could substantiate it, would not put it in.

112
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: June 12, 2020, 10:53:09 AM »
Don't know what happened. So here is the article.

ANOTHER LOOK AT GEORGE FLOYD

After five days of endless tributes and funerals or memorials, George Floyd has finally been put into the ground. Now it is time to put to words some thoughts about Floyd.

America has been subjected to an “orgy” of George Floyd worship. One would believe that he was The Messiah cometh based upon everything reported. Here was a man who was more than a man, a single person who was “worthy” of total adulation and emulation. A loving father of a young child left behind.

Television and other media sources across the country took every effort to show America and the world his funeral.  Here was the loss of a man at the hands of corrupt police and he should be honored as only a very special person deserves.

The truth though is far different.

George Floyd left behind not one, but five children. Yes, five children. Bet ya never heard about that. or about how they are living out their lives, though it would be easy to guess.

George Floyd was also nothing more than a common criminal, and a tool to be used by the Left in their ever increasing goal of eventually taking over America.

Floyd was born Oct 14, 1973. He graduated from high school in 1993 and from there attended minor colleges until dropping out somewhere around 1996-1997.  At various times, he was a “rapper” in Houston and was known as Big Floyd.  He was 6’4” and weighed 223 pounds and family referred to him as a “Gentle Giant.”  (Michael Brown who was shot to death in Ferguson Missouri was also referred to as a “Gentle Giant.”  See a pattern developing?)

Floyd’s first brush with the law occurred Aug 3, 1997 in what appears to be possession of less than one gram of cocaine. (Needless to say, he probably had abused cocaine and had larger amounts on him prior to his first arrest.) This began a documented pattern of brushes with the law for the next ten years, at least.

Additional charges and arrests included”

Theft (twice)
Drugs (several times)
Trespassing
Aggravated Robbery with a deadly weapon

It is the Aggravated Robbery with a deadly weapon which led to 5 years of imprisonment.  The details of this crime are frightening.

In 2007, Floyd broke into a woman’s home with the intent to rob her. He wore a “blue uniform” to appear to be a government employee to gain the woman’s trust to let him into her home. The woman quickly realized that Floyd was not who he said he was and tried to close the door, but he used “brute force” to break into the home from there by holding a handgun to her stomach.

Upon entering, Floyd was quickly joined by five friends inside the house. He began to search the home while another of the intruders held the woman at gunpoint.  During this time, the woman was pistol whipped in the head and arms while trying to scream for help.

Not finding any cash, Floyd and the others took jewelry and her cell phone and fled in the truck that they had arrived in. A neighbor saw the action and immediately reported it to police. The vehicle was quickly located and pulled over with Floyd behind the wheel driving it.  All were arrested.

Floyd was convicted of the crime in 2009 and served 5 years in prison until 2014, when he was released. (It was not the first time that Floyd had committed a crime using a firearm. In 1998 he committed robbery with a firearm and served 10 months in the Harris County Jail.  George was accused of a firearm robbery in August 1998 for which he served 10 months at Harris County Jail.

Additional time spent in jail occurred for

In April 2002, Floyd was condemned to 30 days of prison for trespassing private property.
October 2002, eight months in prison for cocaine.
Oct 2004, ten months in prison for cocaine.
Dec 2005, ten months in prison for cocaine.
After Prison

Upon his release from prison in 2014, the narrative is that Floyd wanted to change his life around. To do so, he became involved in a Christian program in Texas with a history of taking men from there and moving them to Minnesota, providing them with drug rehab and job placement services.

In Minnesota, Floyd worked in various jobs and eventually the nightclub where he worked until his death.  His pattern of unlawful behavior did not appear to cease, instead he just did not get caught. At least not until Memorial Day 2020 when he passed a counterfeit bill in a grocery store. The police were called and he was arrested.

 

Death of Floyd

We all know the story of Floyd’s death by now. He died at the hands of Derek Chauvin, a white police officer, who pressed his knee to Floyd’s neck for eight minutes and 46 seconds during the arrest. But there is more to the story than being reported.

Floyd appeared to be uncooperative and resisting getting into the patrol car. It was such that the cops had to cease putting him into the vehicle and instead laid him out on the ground and then Chauvin placed his knee on the side/back of his neck to further restrain him.  (We will not know how much of a fight Floyd put up until the body cams are released.)

Floyd was handcuffed face down in the street, while two other officers further restrained Floyd and a fourth prevented onlookers from intervening.

In the final moments of George Floyd’s life, as he lay face down and Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin knelt on his neck, another officer asked Chauvin if they should roll Floyd onto his side. “I am worried about excited delirium or whatever,” the officer told Chauvin, according to authorities. Chauvin refused to turn over Floyd, who was pronounced dead shortly after.

For the last three of those minutes Floyd was motionless and had no pulse, but officers made no attempt to revive him. Chauvin kept his knee on Floyd’s neck as arriving emergency medical technicians attempted to treat him.

 

Excited Delirium

The charging documents for Officer Chauvin mentions the term “Excited Delirium” and indicates that the officers were worried about this condition presenting itself. That alone is alarming and in fact, challenges the consensus view of what happened.

Excited delirium is a relatively uncommon health condition characterized by severe agitation, aggression, distress, and is often fatal.  In many cases of excited delirium, individuals will have displayed noticeable increases in body temperature (fever), utilized drugs that altered dopaminergic functioning, and exhibit overtly bizarre behavior.  Although the condition is rare, those with excited delirium are often misdiagnosed, and end up dying before they receive proper medical treatment. Often death is the result of a heart attack.

 

Stages of Excited Delirium

Those that experience excited delirium typically go through various stages including: severe agitation, potential violence, police restraint, struggle, respiratory failure, and usually death.  While death does not always occur, most cases of excited delirium are associated with mortality.

Stage #1: Delirium & Psychomotor Agitation

The first stage of excited delirium is that of a person appearing to be delirious, disoriented, yet hyperactive.  They may be pacing back and forth, yelling, or engaging in violent and combative behavior

Stage #2: Disturbing the Peace

The second stage of excited delirium may exist simultaneously with stage one.  The individual may shout obscenities, display bizarre behavior, and may appear violent.  Though often the police will not be involved until the person is already in this stage, the sight of police could invoke this behavior especially if police are attempting to take the person into custody.

Stage #3: Restraint & Struggle

At this stage, police will usually attempt to restrain the person with excited delirium. Cooperation may be non-existent with the person appearing to be resistant to pain and with high levels of endurance and strength. Eventually the police will restrain the individual, but hopefully not as to constrict the diaphragm as this can lead to death.

Stage #4: Diagnosis & Treatment

After restraint, the police must properly diagnose the individual with and contact medical responders.  With proper diagnosis, a police should attempt to help the patient stay calm, relax, and should use the minimal amount of restraint.

When medical responders arrive, they will need to have a correct diagnosis as well so that proper treatment can be administered.

Stage #5: Recovery vs. Death

In most cases of excited delirium, the patient ends up dying.  This is due to difficulty of diagnosis as well as the fact that death may be inevitable for some individuals with preexisting medical conditions or drug-induced physiological changes.  With proper treatment by both police and medical responders, there is a chance the individual may experience a full recovery.

On the other hand, respiratory failure and cardiac arrest are also common outcomes.  Nearly 2/3 individuals with excited delirium end up dying in police custody or while being transported by paramedics to the hospital.

Causes of Excited Delirium

Causes of excited delirium will differ for each individual. However, there are commonalities in most cases involving the ingestion of a stimulatory drug.

Autopsy analyses among those who died from excited delirium reveal the drug most associated with this condition is cocaine, but methamphetamine is another common culprit.

A cocktail of drugs may also lead to excited delirium.

Autopsy

The Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office ruled Floyd’s death a homicide caused by “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” Also cited were coronary artery disease and hypertension.

Floyd had fentanyl in his system and had recently used meth. Traces of cannabinoids and morphine were present. He also tested positive for the coronavirus in early April, and again after his death, but appeared asymptomatic.

Michael Baden, a hired gun independent examiner concluded Floyd died when his breathing was obstructed by the pressure officers put on his neck and back.

What the Hennepin Examiner did say is that Floyd was NOT asphyxiated.

Thoughts and Observations

As one would expect, PU has some observations and thoughts about this case. So here’s at it.

First, George Floyd had done a lousy job of reforming himself. Not only did he have illegal drugs in his system, he also tried to pass an obviously counterfeit $20 bill. This is not the behavior of a reformed criminal.

Second, being arrested for trying to pass a counterfeit bill while on illegal drugs would have surely resulted in Floyd being sentenced back to prison. Recognition of this could have resulted in excited delirium occurring, if not just attempting to resist arrest.

Third, if the body cameras show that Floyd was agitated or resisting arrest, this is further evidence of a potential problem and would give cause for the arresting cops to restrain him on the ground.

Fourth, the neck restraint hold placed upon Floyd was an allowable procedure under the training guidelines for Minneapolis that Chauvin experienced. So there was nothing illegal to using this method of restraint if done in moderation.

Fifth, the officers were aware of the possibility of excited delirium. Though Chauvin did not put Floyd on his side to lessen the potential for harm, there might have been little that could lessen the potential for death.

Sixth, Floyd had many co-morbidities that could be triggered by the existence of excited delirium.  In fact, his death was attributed to one of those co-morbidities that could be triggered by excited delirium.

Seventh, the arresting officers had no idea of these co-morbidities that plagued Floyd.

Eighth, somehow George had forgotten to give notice to police that he was now a “Gentle Giant” and not someone prove to agitation and violence. If he had given them notice, maybe they would not have restrained him.  (Yes, this is sarcasm.)

Ninth, if Floyd was experiencing excited delirium, then not applying the neck restraint would likely have not have resulted in a different outcome for Floyd. In fact, an argument can be made that pre-existing health conditions aggravated by excited delirium may have been the cause of death.

Tenth, it was not coincidence that Floyd was in this neighborhood, ranging far from home. As Bruno can attest to, the neighborhood where Floyd died was not a typical upright neighborhood. Instead, the neighborhood and street corners were well known for their drug dealing. For a person like Floyd who did not live in the area to go there, only one reason would normally exist, to score some drugs.

The Left and the Media has used the death of George to advance their own agenda and nothing more. They do not care about the search for truth and what really happened that fateful Memorial Day.

At some point, there will be further details to come out about the death of George Floyd. Some of these details will be what video cams recorded and about the relationship between George Floyd and Officer Derek Chauvin. If the details revealed support the concept that it was excited delirium or some other factors that contributed to the death of Floyd, or made death likely under any circumstances, then the Left and the Media is responsible for all that has happened since.

Unfortunately, the damage has been done. Any innocent verdict will only result in more riots and protests, much wider and more violent in scale. We are left in dangerous times now.

(Note: I am not arguing that the officers were innocent or guilty of anything, least of all murder. I don’t know the answer. I only present other parts of the story not getting any air time. We will have to wait for the rest of the story to come out before we can come to any conclusions.)

As always, I thank Mark for allowing me to post my thoughts. I hope all who read this find my thoughts valuable. Most important to remember…..

LIFE IS GOOD!!!   (No matter the challenges it brings)

113
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: June 11, 2020, 06:17:40 PM »
Hi all, Just checking in.

If you remember back in Jun 2106, when Trump took the escalator down to the lobby of Trump Tower, I was out there as one of the first to say that the election was over and Trump would be President. I was proven correct to the shock of many at that time.

Just want to say that I am not near so certain this time. In fact, I can see him losing if things align right. Let me explain.

1. The economy is not going to recover as quickly as hoped.

2. A real likelihood of Covid 19 resurgence requiring another shutdown of the country.

3. A very strong Dem VP pick so 25th Amendment can be invoked leading to first woman/black President.

4. Trump and his damned Twitter account where he can't keep control of his emotions.

5. Alienation of suburban wine moms.

6. National Debt and Far Right.id

This is a 4th Turning Year which was triggered by Covid 19. 4th Turnings have a way of surprising people in the direction they go.

Finally, Trump's election was a reaction to the years of Obama and before that, Bush 43. Typically, reaction elections are followed by Presidents not being reelection when a reaction election occurs. Just think Jimmy Carter.

Shall be watching the polls closing and updating state's status as they come in to see where things really stand. But not hopeful right now.

Also,  you might like an article I just wrote on George Floyd for SpartaReport. I provided info NOT being covered by the media.

THAT IS ALL!  Now remember. 

LIFE IS GOOD ( even with all the uncertainty of today)

https://www.spartareport.com/2020/06/another-look-at-george-floyd/





114
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: November 07, 2019, 03:36:00 PM »
Sparta Report has Day 1 of the 12 Days of News Media Clowns up.  John Harwood is Day 1.

https://www.spartareport.com/2019/11/pu-presents-the-12-days-of-news-media-clowns-day-1/

115
Science, Culture, & Humanities / Re: PU Predicts Week 6 NCAA Top 25 Games
« on: November 07, 2019, 01:16:17 PM »
I not only went out on a limb for the Gophers, but I am sawing it off behind me!


117
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: October 29, 2019, 12:11:58 PM »
Let me see what I can do.

118
And what I wrote for the 12th Day of Corrupt Democratic Politicians and Hillary.

https://www.spartareport.com/2019/10/pus-the-12-days-of-corrupt-democratic-politicians-day-12/

119
Politics & Religion / Re: 2020 Presidential election
« on: October 29, 2019, 07:32:03 AM »
Thanks!  It was fun doing it, until the last couple. Just too much info and did not want to write a book.

New series will be the 12 Days of News Media Idiots.  Problem there is that they are all idiots, so how do I select who fits in the 12 Days.

120
Politics & Religion / Joe Biden corruption
« on: October 28, 2019, 06:40:24 PM »
Hey all!

Thought I would pop in and relay what is happening with Trump with us "simple" people.

The support for Trump is solid. And frankly, we not only don't care about the comments he makes, we actually love it that he is fighting and is crass as time. He speaks as we speak, and understands us.

There are some hard right that claim they will not vote for him because he has not built the wall yet, or else not stopped illegal immigration, but those are a small minority, and most will vote for him in the end.

There is growing support for Trump among blacks and hispanics, those who are not dependent upon government handouts. Just that alone would be enough to put him over the top.

As to Biden, I would direct you to an article I wrote last week. It was a series, The 12 Days of Corrupt Democratic Politicians. 

This was Day 11, Joe Biden day. https://www.spartareport.com/2019/10/193310/

What I got out of doing the series was a true understanding of just how corrupt all politicians are. And why all are fighting Trump and the Ukraine.  The corruption is just unbelievable.


121
Science, Culture, & Humanities / PU Predicts Week 6 NCAA Top 25 Games
« on: October 02, 2019, 04:11:00 PM »
The AMAZING and ALL KNOWING PU offers his predictions for the NCAA Week 6 Top 25 teams!


No. 1 Alabama – Bye Week

Alabama finally made it to the #1 spot after Clemson barely won against North Carolina. Now, the Crimson Tide takes the week off to enjoy that #1 ranking. Next up is Texas A&M in a road game.



No. 2 Clemson – Bye Week

Last year, it was Syracuse almost upending a #1 Clemson. Last week, North Carolina missed defeating Clemson by a missed two point conversion play in the last seconds of the game.

The North Carolina game showed that Clemson cannot afford to take any team for granted in conference play. And, it knocked Clemson down to #2 in the rankings.

Clemson looked pathetic on offense for most of the game. The offensive line played terrible, with 6 pre-snap penalties while not being able to open holes for the running backs.

Trevor Lawrence showed none of the spark that he presented in last year’s National Title game, a worrisome weakness for a national title for the second year in a row.

The bye week comes at a welcome time for the Tigers. Maybe they can get their offense on track.


No. 3 Georgia (-25.5) at Tennessee

Georgia had a well earned week off last week after defeating Notre Dame in a tough game the week before. It allowed them to prepare for their tough SEC play coming up.

Tennessee offers nothing to stop Georgia’s offense. And the Georgia defense is stifling. This will be a rout. Georgia wins and COVERS the spread.


No. 25 Michigan State at No. 4 Ohio State (-20)

In one of several games on tap this week, two Top 25 teams meet in a conference showdown. Michigan State goes to Ohio State in an East meets West matchup.

West teams have beaten Ohio State and kept them out of the playoffs the last two years. The Buckeyes intend to stop that streak.

Ohio State’s transfer quarterback Justin Fields continues to impress under the new offense. Fields continues to bolster his Heisman credentials with 284 total yards and 4 touchdowns last week. Meanwhile, the defense continues to show its stuff.

Michigan State goes into this game with Wisconsin, Penn State and Michigan in the near future. This stretch will define the season for the Spartans.

Expect Fields to carry the weight of the offense on his shoulders since the Spartan defense should shut down the running game.

Ohio State wins and COVERS the spread.


Utah State at No. 5 LSU (-26)

Utah State goes to LSU as 26 point underdogs. Unfortunately, State does not have the benefit of using last week’s strategy for slowing down the LSU offense, having  another  bye week for the Tigers.

Joe Burrow has tossed 17 touchdowns so far this season and the Tiger’s have 231 points in four games. That is more touchdowns than previous Tiger teams have tossed the entire year.

Next up for LSU is Florida, so this is a good warm up game. LSU wins and COVERS the spread.


No. 6 Oklahoma (-35.5) at Kansas

Oklahoma goes to Kansas in preparation for the following week’s matchup with Texas. The previous week, the Sooners manhandled Texas Tech, and this week will be no different.

Jaylen Hurts continues the Heisman chases, racking up big numbers again.

Oklahoma will win, but because they are looking forward to Texas, they DO NOT COVER the spread.


No. 7 Auburn (-3) at No. 10 Florida

WOW!!!! What a matchup for the weekend! Auburn meets Florida in a Top 10 and SEC season making game.

Auburn has shown itself to be a real team capable of ruining season hopes for other SEC teams. Having the toughest schedule of any team this year, this game will show just how strong they really are.

Quarterback Bo Nix is getting more comfortable in the offense and the defense is one of the best in the country. This is needed because Auburn has three road games, with the last at LSU, then hosts both Georgia and Alabama. If the Tigers can win three out of four of the big games, then they may play for the National Title.

Florida finally gets tested for real. And then they get LSU, South Carolina and Georgia. So the road ahead is challenging for them also.

It will be Florida’s defense that keeps them in the game. They have seven players with multiple sacks, and a defensive front that is as good as any in the nation.

Going against the consensus, Florida wins in an UPSET!


Kent State at No. 8 Wisconsin (-37)

Here is an easy game to pick. Kent State goes to Wisconsin. 

Wisconsin had a touch outing last week, relying upon the defense to provide 2 touchdowns to win. This week, there will not be that worry.

Badger running back Jonathan Taylor continues to perform well, with another 100 yard game. This keeps him in the Heisman hunt, but a long shot for sure.

Wisconsin wins and COVERS the spread.


Bowling Green at No. 9 Notre Dame (-45)

Notre Dame bounced back big after their frustrating loss to Auburn. Their defeat of Virginia kept them in the national title hunt, but they will need a lot of help to get into the playoffs. Bowling Green will offer the Irish little competition.

The spread of 45 points for this game is just too much, but not because Notre Dame cannot score enough. The score only depends upon when the Irish decide to let up on the gas and rest.

Notre Dame wins, but DOES NOT COVER.


No. 11 Texas (-11) at West Virginia

Texas is another team, hanging onto National Title hopes, but it also needs help from SEC teams knocking off one another.
Texas had the week off after defeating Oklahoma State two weeks ago. This break allowed them the chance to prepare not just for West Virginia, but also the upcoming Oklahoma matchup, which should decide the conference title.
Sam Ehlinger, the Texas quarterback, continues to impress with 16 touchdowns and only 1 interception. This week will add to those numbers.
Texas wins and COVERS the spread.


Purdue at No. 12 Penn State (-28)

Penn State is trying to continue to be relevant by whooping up on Maryland last Friday night. But that is not going to help them in getting a spot in the playoffs.

Purdue comes to Penn State as 4 touchdown underdogs, so there is “no need to fear” for the Nittany Lions this week. Purdue is missing Elijah Sindelar and Rondale Moore to injuries, and that will severely hamper the Boilmakers.

Penn State will use this as a warm up practice before taking on Iowa, Michigan and Michigan three consecutive weeks. If the Lions pass those tests, then will come Ohio State on Nov 23. At that point, we will know how good or bad Penn State really is.

Penn State wins, but FAILS TO COVER the spread.

Cal at No. 13 Oregon (-15.5)

The Ducks entertain Cal at home after a much needed bye week. This is a Pac 12 North key game for both teams.

Oregon quarterback Justin Hebert will be going against a Cal secondary that has proven to be very tough on opponents so far. Oregon who is undefeated in the Pac 12 North needs the win before meeting one loss Washington later in October.

Cal already has a victory over Washington. If they can defeat Oregon, then the Pac 12 North is theirs for the taking. In a surprise Cal UPSETS Oregon.


No. 14 Iowa at No. 19 Michigan (-4)

In another Top 25 match up, Iowa goes to Michigan as a 4 point underdog. This game defines the rest of the season for each team.

Iowa has shown itself to be a good team with a strong offense. They have many weapons on offense with a strong trio of running backs to provide good yardage gained numbers. Their defense is even better, one of the best in the nation.

Michigan has not been the team that was expected in the pre-season. Their offense has been sporadic, and the defense not much better. This game is needed to restore some confidence in the team and in Coach Harbaugh.

Michigan goes all in and wins, but DOES NOT COVER the spread.


No. 15 Washington (-14.5) at Stanford

Washington goes to Stanford already having a loss to Cal in the Pac 12. One more loss, and the Roses are a memory.

Stanford had hopes for a good season, but injuries have derailed the team. Now, they just hope tp play spoiler.

Call this for Washington, but they DO NOT COVER the spread.


No. 16 Boise State (-24) at UNLV

Boise State goes to Las Vegas after a bye week. They are missing their top tackler, middle linebacker Ezekiel Noa, lost for the season due to injury. The running game is strong and Robert Mahone and George Holani should be able to run freely against the Runnin Rebels.
Boise State wins and COVERS the spread.



No. 17 Utah – Bye Week

Utah comes to the bye week at a much needed time. The Utes need to allow injuries to heal before continuing towards a Pac 12 South title.

Next on the list is Oregon State before a tough game against Arizona State.


No. 18 UCF (-4.5) at Cincinnati

After losing in a stunning loss to Pitt two weeks ago, UCF got back on track, beating UConn 56-21. Now they go to Cincinnati to take on the Bearcats.

Freshman quarterback Dillon Gabriel has stepped up and is playing well after stepping in when injuries to other quarterbacks left them unable to play. He has been a source of inspiration for the team.

The Bearcats have a decent team, with a very strong defense. If UCF protects the ball, they should win.

UCF needs the win for any hope of a New Year’s Day bowl.  UCF wins and COVERS the spread.


No. 20 Arizona State – Bye Week

Arizona State takes the week off after defeating Cal 24-17 last Friday. Now, they prepare for Washington State on October 12, their third top 25 ranked team that they hope to defeat.


No. 21 Oklahoma State (-10) at Texas Tech

Oklahoma State began the season unranked, but have shown that they have the ability to play big. Losing to Texas two weeks ago, they bounced back defeating Kansas State, another unexpectedly good team.

Watch for Chuba Hubbard and Tylan Wallace of the Cowboys, they are fun to watch running with the ball.

Tech brings little to the table for this game and this season. Cowboys win and COVER the spread.


No. 22 Wake Forest – Bye Week

Say what?  Wake Forest plays football and is ranked? What is the world coming to?
Last time Wake Forest started 5-0, they found themselves in the 2006 season Orange Bowl. And with Louisville, Florida State and NC State on the schedule, they will find themselves in a December Bowl game.


No. 23 Virginia – Bye Week

Virginia needs the rest this week after a particularly tough loss last week to Notre Dame. They still hope for an ACC championship game berth, and if they get that, a December Bowl game. Anything else is asking for far too much.


Tulsa at No. 24 SMU (-12.5)

Haven’t seen an SMU team play this well in a long time. At 5-0, they look to make it 6-0 when hosting Tulsa this week at home.
Expect Tulsa to give them a challenge. Tulsa tends to play them tough and should do so again.

SMU wins, but DOES NOT COVER the spread.


No. 25 Texas A&M – Bye Week

This bye week could not have come soon enough for the Aggies. They get to rest and prep for Bama on the 12th. But even that will not be enough as A&M gets another loss dealt to them by Top 10 teams.

That is this week’s look at the NCAA Top 25 games on tap. Should be another exciting week as the SEC conference games heat up. Enjoy the games and we shall meet again next week.


122
Hey Everyone.

I am back! 

Just wondering anyone's thoughts on all the REPOs and the current liquidity crunch going on.

Pat

123
Politics & Religion / Re: The Cognitive Dissonance of the left
« on: September 20, 2019, 11:41:10 AM »
OH NOES!

I am back! 

Just wondering anyone's thoughts on all the REPOs and the current liquidity crunch going on.

Pat

124
Politics & Religion / Re: 2016 Presidential
« on: November 09, 2016, 06:59:08 AM »
   I TOLD YOU SO!!!   

125
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: May 18, 2016, 06:44:35 PM »
I am chuckling at your reviews, no, I am laughing at them. 

The purpose of an article is to communicate a thought to a specific group of people. A technical article requires one type of writing, a “sophisticated” elitist requires another style of writing. And reaching a specific demographic like the middle class requires another distinctive style of writing.

This article was designed to reach the common, middle class person who has been fed the same crap that I have heard time and again about supporting Trump. It was not designed to give “full-throated” defenses of Trump to people who are “my betters”, to people who will only vote for Trump because the alternative is too “unthinkable”.

The article was written to deliver an emotional message.

1.   People supporting Trump are not alone. There are millions of people experiencing the same attacks and denigration and we stand together.

2.   The use of the term Americans in its many instances was deliberate and specific. Where the elitists use Nationalism as a degrading term, I used the term Americans to deliver a specific definition that was identified by each section and the photos that were used.  American in this case meant Patriotic.  Seems that the people reading the article caught on to that.

3.   The use of the WW2 photo of Americans at Omaha Beach was to show that the people who support Trump are the same ones that time and again, have risked their lives for an ideal, a uniquely American ideal.

4.   The Red Cross photo and the catastrophes that we respond to across the world represented the American spirit of generosity and the propensity to lend a hand wherever needed, at home or abroad.

5.   The At Home Section represented the people supporting Trump were the same people that you see every day in cities and communities. These are the people who make up the communities, who are the people who hold them together. They are the people who you will find at the core of any successful community.

6.   The All We Ask section was self-explanatory. As was what we want.

The message that I delivered was that the people who support Trump want a return to American Values from the 50’s and 60’s. Reagan values, Love of Family, Country, Community and God. We want a financially responsible country where people once again become dependent upon themselves and not the government.

With the supporters, there will be differences, represented by Pro Choice or Pro Life. But those positions do not adversely affect the underlying values that we seek a return to.

I realize that what I wrote did not meet your standards, but I don’t give a damn. You were not my target audience.

I wrote this to a specific demographic which represents the majority of the people in this country, the upper lower class, the middle class person and upper middle class people. These are the people that will Make America Great Again, not the insufferable upper class who believe themselves to be smarter and wiser than anyone else.

BTW, as to Cruz, the guy all of you loved, why don’t you check out his religion?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Theology

Read it and you realize that he was the Christians own version of Islam where religious leaders were the only ones fit to rule. Pathetic.

And as I post this, I see GM has commented again. Now I am truly pissed off. I came back just for the last couple of days, and I get this crap.

Well, I am truly through with posting here.

And GM, go fuck yourself, you arrogant bastard.

Now, CD you can ban me. I don't care because I won't be back.

126
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: May 15, 2016, 06:29:23 PM »
www.hotgas.net   We are not "the other site that will not be named".

No, I do not work for the Trump campaign or anyone else. 

127
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: May 15, 2016, 03:32:29 PM »
Doug,

First, I want everyone here to think about writing an article. We at HotGas want a place where we can begin to bring together the divisions within the Party, offering the Cruz supporters especially a place where they can come and discuss with the Trump supporters on how to change the country for the better. And it first begins with defeating Hillary.  Well, actually this is not true because I do not believe come the end of October that she will be the candidate.

As to the articles you ask about, I will have to take some time and go back and list them. But I can't do that for a couple of days at least. I need to finish a project I am working on for a presentation this week about taking some of my work products and turning them into Smart Phone apps. A new direction for getting my products to market.




128
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: May 15, 2016, 12:59:14 PM »
GM,

When I said evil incarnate, I was referring to articles posted by the media that have called Trump everything in the books. So I apologize if I did  not make that clear.

I invite you to put together an article on your concerns about Trump and what you think he should do and how you think he can be influenced to make those changes. Inf fact, I invite everyone here to write something and I will get it posted.

We also welcome Reader Submissions on other topics. A recent one that generated much interest was on the coming financial crisis, and how to prepare for a general societal collapse.

At HG, we are people like all others. We have our fears and our concerns, but we just want to get the US back on the right track.

129
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: May 15, 2016, 08:32:36 AM »
Since I quit posting here, I have been lurking, reading the posts on the election and the candidates. Several times I have almost posted, but realized that I would once again subject myself to negative articles about Trump promoting media and political talking points that have taken Trump’s words out of  context, his history having been distorted, and rants that Trump is evil incarnate. I can go anywhere for that.

Since Hotair.com blew themselves up by going over Facebook for posting, I have been a part of www.HotGas.net  I am a featured commenter and one of the moderators there.

There is no place generally to go and have a reasoned debate on Trump, Clinton and the ongoing election. Go to The Right Scoop, and anyone opposing Cruz is subjected to the vilest comments imaginable. (I went there once and after writing about 50 words on why the article written was misrepresenting a Trump position, I was attacked in ways that would make a sailor blush. And within two minutes, I was permanently banned.)

Conservation Review? The same thing occurs. Luciannel.com? Yep, banned The National Review, pro Trump comments are often deleted. But the same happens with the Pro Trump website, The Conservative Treehouse.

I am writing this because I am extending an offer to anyone here.

At HotGas, we would welcome anyone here to pen a thought out article on your views of Trump, other candidates, or the coming General Election.  Then, we can have a reasonable discussion, no name calling, etc.

If anyone chooses to write an article, be prepared to back up claims with proof or facts to support the claims. You will be challenged on what is presented.
Know that HG does support Trump. But know this also…..over 50% of our posters and readers were either Cruz people, as a first or second choice, but most have flipped. We would be happy to discuss why the flipping.

This is your opportunity to present your views to a website that has over 15k unique visits per day, and about 30k hits per day.  Just amazing for a website that began on Feb 8, 2016 and has been operational for just 3 months.

If you want to submit an article, just send me an email, and I will get it posted as a Featured Reader Submission. Just make sure it is well thought out and not just a series of rants.

Pat   ppulatie@pacbell.net

130
Politics & Religion / Re: Sen.Ted Cruz
« on: January 06, 2016, 11:36:26 AM »
I haven't been commenting on posts because I am tired of going over the same old crap each time. But both of you have taken the Trump comments out of context so I must intervene. Here is what he was pointing out.

1. The Courts have never ruled on the question of what constitutes a natural born citizen and the Constitution is vague about it. In fact, courts have been loath to address this subject.

2. Grayson, the Florida Rep, has already indicated that

Quote
Speaking on Alan Colmes’ radio show last week, Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson let us in on his nefarious plan:

I’m waiting for the moment that he gets the nomination, and then I will file that beautiful lawsuit saying that he’s unqualified for the job because he’s …Call me crazy but I think the President of America should be an American,” he added.

3. There are already at least two lawsuits regarding this in the State Courts right now, Florida and either Vermont or New Hampshire. The allegation is that Cruz and Rubio are not natural born, so they cannot be on the state ballots.

4. If you read comments on the different websites, there are huge numbers of people who state that they will not vote for either because they are not eligible to run for president.

Each of you argue that the Dems will use anything possible to attack Trump if he is the nominee. Why do you not think that the Dems would use eligibility to attack either Rubio or Cruz?  Of course they will..........as Grayson proves.  (Who cares if he is a nutter? Who needs the distraction?)

It is better to get this out in the open and resolved now, instead of waiting for the General Election for it to come up. 

BTW, from my own reading, I believe that they are eligible. But I also understand how it could be used against them if not countered now. Look at what was done with Obama.

Also, since I am at it, each of you have also stated that the polls are showing that Rubio can beat Hillary but not Trump. Yet you also challenge those same polls by saying when it comes to Trump beating the other GOP candidates, they mean nothing until the primaries have run their course.

You can't have it both ways!  Provide reasons for believing that they are correct in one case, but not the other, especially when Trump is showing such a huge lead in the different states and in the national polls.  (At least I do try and postulate why Rubio might be matching up better against Hillary than Trump.)

nuff said...


131
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 28, 2015, 07:01:43 PM »
The GOPe was the ones who pushed McCain and Romney.

And, with the polls, I have always said that Rubio first had to win the nomination, but he is so far down he cannot win at this point.

And remember, I have always said that Rubio will end up being the candidate do to Convention manipulations.

Why is every one in love with Rubio? He is going to break your hearts......and at least I have no illusions about Trump.


132
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 28, 2015, 03:25:05 PM »
CD

Ignoring my sarcasm?   :evil:

The GOPe told us that Romney and McCain were both electable. Look what is got us. Now they are saying that Rubio is electable. Why should this time be any different?

133
Politics & Religion / Re: TPP Trans Pacific Partnership
« on: December 28, 2015, 12:14:14 PM »
It cannot be voted on until O'Bummer sends it to the Senate. And O'Bummer believes that it will need Rep support, but the Senate is afraid to vote on it before the election for fear of a backlash against their candidates who vote for it.  (TPP must be signed by Oct 2017 by all countries.)  So don't expect the cowards to move on it until after the election in a lame duck session.


134
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 28, 2015, 10:25:01 AM »
"Rubio is electable."

Where have I  heard that before?  Presidents McCain and Romney come to mind.

135
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 05:39:34 PM »
BTW,

For all of those who don't like the thought of having to vote for Trump if he is the nominee and having a wish that it was someone else...........

Welcome to the Club. This is what I and others have had to do with McCain and Romney for the past two elections. 

136
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 05:11:14 PM »
DMG,

What the hell did Gowdy accomplish?  Not a damned thing. He let the Wicked One off. It was a typical DC display of nothing.


137
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 05:09:58 PM »
Yes, but he was in business. What was he to do? Ignore the benefits and make less profits?

Trump is now blowing the whistle on same. He is telling what happens and that it must be stopped. Does that not count for something?

When is everyone going to start attacking him for taking tax breaks?  I am sure that is coming.

Everyone is also after Trump because he is rick. Well, it is about damned time for the rich to stop having to apologize for being rich. They got rich by making money. And for every dollar that a person like Trump has made, he has put many times that amount into the economy through business operations and taxes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgxlp2UJI5I&feature=youtu.be

138
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 04:00:05 PM »
Since you caught it, what do you think about the premise?

139
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 11:48:46 AM »
I cannot believe that no one caught the deliberate contradiction that I put into my comments.

I wrote about the anti-federalists who did not believe in a strong federal government, and that if you read what Brutus and others wrote, that they predicted what would happen in all three branches of governments, and which has since been proven to be correct.

I also wrote about the need for a "central" government that could sort out the various issues between the states and the contradictions in the laws that might exist between states.

Then I wrote that the problem with government are inherent in all institutions and firms........that they must grow and increase their power and influence or die.

Finally, I mentioned the problem with the politicians and that they are beholden to the special interests that further erode government's responsibility to the electorate.

The contradiction:

1. As proven by the Articles of Confederation, a loose collection of states means that nothing will get done. This is even more true in today's world.

2. A stronger federal government as presented by the pro federalists and which won the day will always lead to the federal government taking control of everything over the years and decades. It is human and corporate nature.

3. The end result is that neither can work over an extended period of time due to human nature.

What is the solution? We certainly can't restrain the growth of government. Many pretend that it is possible, but any measures taken to restrain government will only be temporary and in most cases, token measures only meant to appease a certain group. Yet, we can't allow it continued growth.

Thomas Jefferson was correct that the Tree of Liberty must be replenished from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. But now we have gone too long for such a response to work. Government has become far too strong to allow for rebellion.

The other alternative is to let government and the country crash, and then rebuild again. But how it gets rebuilt and into what form is unknowable until it is finished.

Or, we can go DDF's route and consider three separate countries...........

140
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 09:07:11 AM »
Come on...........the mud raking has been going on long before Trump. And he is saying only what needs to be said to destroy the pc culture.

As to Cruz and Rubio, look at their voting patterns versus what they say. Rubio is especially establishment and Cruz is only marginally better.

You don't believe that the entrenched interests influence everything that occurs? I guess that I just belong to the vast group of conspiracy minded folks who still believe that the moon landings never occurred.

Yeah, Rubio just needs the votes.  :-D  If he can't beat either Trump or Cruz, where are they going to come from for him to win the nomination?  Of course!!! The GOPe changing the convention rules so that they can put in Rubio. And if they do, goodbye GOP. And that will be well deserved.


141
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 08:58:09 AM »
Are you going to do a Constitutional Convention for everything that comes up? Or Amendments to the Bill of Rights? Can't happen so there must be another mechanism.

Again, SCOTUS ruled on Kelo. They ruled that the State Laws were valid and it was up to the states to change the laws as necessary or desired. This is Article 10 in full display.
If you want to argue that SCOTUS overplayed its hand, then you might as well go back and force a revision to Marbury v Madison (1803) which set the boundaries for judicial review.

We are a country split into three basic factions now. The middle and extreme left, the moderates, and the middle and extreme right. The left and the right are rigid in their beliefs and want their views absolute. The middle wants compromise. What  will be the outcome, who knows? But I am predicting another round of financial and then societal collapse.

142
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 27, 2015, 07:49:24 AM »
Yes, Donald has contributed to all of those Democrats, but at the same time he was also contributing to Republican candidates. That is what business people do, especially those living in the large urban areas.

If you want a purity candidate that has never done the same, fine. But that will eliminate large numbers of very competent people who could run the country quite well. What we are seeing with Donald is exactly the reasons why good competent people do not get into politics. Why put up with the crap and having reputations dragged across the mud? Why waste the time when they could be doing good elsewhere by making money and creating wealth and jobs?

If you want a professional class of politicians who are incompetent and care only about themselves, their party and getting elected, then let's just continue on the same course. Let's elect those who are "party approved" and "party tested" and then have them screw the people on a daily basis by passing legislation that is designed to assist their masters.

The US as it stands now only has a handful of years to change course. Will that happen under Rubio? Hell no. Under Cruz? Hell no. Both are nothing more than pawns in a huge game designed to benefit party interests and to make money.

Will it change under Trump? Probably not. But he has a better chance that the others because he can rally the masses better than most. Unfortunately, this will not be enough either because the entrenched interests that influence current politicians will not let hi prevail.

I am just going to sit back and watch Rubio be given the nomination. Then I will watch his failures and his sell outs and at the end, say I told you so. Hopefully then, I will be in a financial position where I can avoid the worst of the coming collapse.


143
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 26, 2015, 12:00:25 PM »
You are missing my point. Maybe I did not put it properly.

There is a need for States Rights and Article 10 protections, but when they conflict with other states and the other states do not accept Article 10 protections, then thee must be a regulating authority.

When technology introduces new innovations that causes conflicts with previous standards and the courts cannot resolve the issues, then there must be a way to resolve the issues.

There are certain needs that only a federal government can take care of like defense. There are other needs that a state is better equipped to take care of. There must be a balance between the two. But unfortunately, government intrudes in places that it should not, and they do it as a need to justify their existence and to increase their power.

With the American Creed, yes, freedom, free markets etc. are the key. But this assumes that people are also honest and through working towards their own goals, they can also benefit mankind. But human nature does not act that way. Far too many will act in ways to benefit themselves at the expense of others. And when you have entities like the banks and Wall Street firms, how does the public get protected from their practices?

Federal Government must be a fine balance between serving the public in its best interests and becoming an overwhelming force that acts against the public good. The problem is that government is now populated by those who have no regard for this balance, but instead to seek an enhancement of their powers and authority.

Government must also seek the same balance in "American Creed" freedoms. It must allow freedom of speech but at the same time, be able to place limits on it like "shouting fire in a crowded theater". It must allow for 2nd Amendment protections, but at the same time, it must have the ability to restrict 2nd Amendment protections in the case of felons, etc.

Again, the problem is that the bureaucrats over exceed their authority and place harmful restrictions based upon a whim or in the case of global warming, false science. And these bureaucrats are put into their places by incompetent politicians who likely believe in their same causes.

The problem is how to restrain government from enacting these foolish policies.

144
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 26, 2015, 11:26:00 AM »
Knew people would not like that statement and all the other I wrote.   :-D :-D :-D

145
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 26, 2015, 10:21:20 AM »
DMG, in  reply....

1. The poll I posted that have the Rep oversampled, there was an "interesting" factoid found in it by another person. Turns out that in an obscure area of the results, the poll numbers showed that it was the Dems oversampled. This was brought to the attention of the pollster and they admitted that the Dems were the ones oversampled. Just a minor error had occurred on that one line.

2. What are the limits on government power? That really is the question that needs to be answered. And of which there will always be controversy.

When I consider this question, I always go back to the Federalist Papers and the arguments presented for and against the Constitution. The basic argument with the anti-Federalist position was that with the Constitution, it make for a stronger government and eventually that government would usurp the powers of the states. The anti side wanted less government and more state.  (Interesting isn't it that now the conservatives promote the Federalist Papers, and the Dems go even more extreme.)

The anti-Federalists who wrote the arguments for their side absolutely predicted what would happen in the future. They literally foresaw that the government would become a monster agency controlling the lives of all and would essentially control the states. They also saw that a new political class would emerge, and they saw that the judiciary would become the problem that it is now.  Yet, the anti-Federalists are the ones held in disgrace.

The other side of the coin is that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was written about 240 years ago. (This part is going to set your hair on fire.) Then, there were only about 3.5 million people in the country. The country was rural without even electricity, sewage, and the other conveniences of life. There was no way that the authors of the Constitution  could see the progress to be made and the changes to the country. In large part, that is why the Constitution was written with such vagueness in many areas.

The progress of civilization dictates that there must be an ability to adapt to the new changes that will occur in society and technology. And there must be an entity that can lead the way for adaptation. Of course, that entity must be a government that is more centralized rather than spread out fully across the states.

To provide an example on technological changes, let's take the 4th Amendment. Back in the 1700's, weaponry was breach loading firearms and cannon. The 2nd Amendment gave the right to bear arms. There was no question of limitations because the arms were certainly needed for the young country.

Now we look to today. Machine guns, missiles, RPGs, tanks, etc. Does the 4th mean that all are acceptable to own? Why own fully functional RPG's? Also fully functional tanks with the ammo?  Are restrictions required? And what about the mentally ill or felons?  So the 4th is not all encompassing and inviolate. Then who must decide whether ownership of certain weapons are allowable? The states would have some rights, but also the government.

Look at technology. Computers and the Internet. This has provoked radical change in society. Everything has been affected from privacy rights to freedom of speech. Who and how is this to be regulated?  When the changes occur and they affect previously accepted norms, then litigation is required, usually at the state level, but also the federal level. But the courts are not prepared for this nor understand the arguments, so they rely often on previous precedent. Rulings are made that may make no sense in light of the new products, but occur anyway. Who is there to sort this out?

One can argue Article 10 and States Rights, but there are problems with this. Take gun ownership for example. You live in Florida and legally own rifles, shotguns and hand guns. You decide to go hunting in Maine, loan up the SUV and go. Then you hit Maryland and get pulled over for a traffic violation. They notice the weapons in the vehicle. You are immediately arrested and become a felon, because under Maryland law, you must register weapons all weapons. Maryland does not accept Article 10 and Florida law on firearms.

The problem of Governmental Power is the result of incompetent people being elected to Congress and the Presidency. They make policies that establish Federal Agencies to administer the new policies like the CFPB and Dodd Frank, Obamacare, the EPA, DOE, etc. And when the new Agencies get up and running, they are tasked with creating the laws and regulations to enforce the new policies.

You also have the "games" that the politicians play with their electorate and their votes. Take TPA for example.

Both sides wanted TPP to be passed. They knew that they could not get the 67 votes to pass. So they create the TPA bill that essentially says instead of 67 votes to pass, you need 51 votes to deny and they pass it. So they simply changed the rules to avoid their constitutional requirements.  (Cruz voted for this bill...later he said he was deceived by it.)

TPP then comes up and with it, 51 votes against cannot be mustered, so it passes, where otherwise it would have been denied. (Cruz votes against it and can provide the excuse that TPA deceived him, or he would have voted against it.  Misdirection?) These are the games they play.

Frankly, there are probably few limits left on governmental power. This is because government is like any firm. It must grow or it loses influence and dies. So it grows by assuming more power and responsibility.

The only way to restrain this growth is to cut off funding and to cut manpower. Inefficient agencies must be eliminated and others restructured. If not, continued growth will occur. This is how government has restrained and shrunk the military. But the government will not allow this to happen to them.

Trump has said that he is ready to eliminate 5 different  Agencies and wants to restructure others. Then he wants to reduce waste, spending and to make them more efficient. He would be treating the Agencies as a business. Will it work? Certainly the Agencies and the Congress will do everything they can to stop him. And for the Agencies, it is try to delay changes until Trump is out of office. But if you want to restrain Governmental Power, this is where it begins.

As to Supreme Court appointments, he has indicated that he wanted judges who would follow the rule of law. As to anything else, if he cites "who" he would appoint, it would just provide the anti-Trump forces more ammunition to go after him.

Immigration? You want detailed plans....? Whatever he says, he will be "eaten alive" anyway.

Eminent Domain? SCOTUS has effectively ruled on that case. In Kelo, they stated that Connecticutt had laws on the books that governed Eminent Domain and those laws would apply. So in that case, it was Article 10 and States rights that prevailed. But SCOTUS also stated that the States had the authority to change their laws to meet what their states wanted, so Article 10 applied. And SCOTUS also stated that the States had to define Public Interest for themselves. Article 10 again.

You argue that Trump will change all of this. I ask "HOW"? He does not have the power as President to do so. You might say by Executive Order, but that only applies to Federal Agencies, and this would not work.

Frankly, I see the Eminent Domain argument as irrelevant.




146
Politics & Religion / Re: 2016 Presidential
« on: December 25, 2015, 02:59:09 PM »
DDF

The war on women attitude is exactly what Trump is prepared to attack Hillary on. He is setting her up for the kill. Any other Rep nominee would be too afraid to go there.

I cannot wait for her and Trump to debate. He will get her off the "canned sound bites" and she will totally lose it. That will be the point that Trump wins the election.  (This should have happened with O'Bummer in 2012, but Romney or the others were not the "men" to do it.)

147
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 25, 2015, 02:56:05 PM »
Thank you. Interesting points.

When looking at it from a Russian perspective, Putin does make sense.

Unfortunately, we tend to look at things from an American perspective. We forget that Russia has throughout the ages been the victim (yes, I said that) of the Mongols and many other groups. Therefore, security and the fear of neighbors and insurgents becomes a prime factor in thinking.

You are right in my opinion about what is happening in the US. We are becoming balkanized along ethnic grounds and the liberal bias is making it worse every day. I too fear what it will be like in three years.

148
Politics & Religion / Re: 2016 Presidential
« on: December 25, 2015, 12:09:34 PM »
I am really beginning to love this!!!! Here is why:

The arguments against Trump.

1. He is not going to run. He is just seeking publicity. Oops, he announced.

2. He is not going to file the preliminary paperwork. This is all a game. Oops, he did.

3. He is not going to file his financials. He is running a bluff.  Oops, he did.

4. He is not a serious candidate.

5. He is only at 7%. No one supports him. He will not go any higher.

6. Trump is now at 15%. That is his ceiling. He can't go higher.

7. Trump's disapproval ratings are about 70%. He only gets about a 30% approval. With his negatives, he can't go any higher.

8. The Fox debate and his performance was pitiful. He will lose support.

9. Trump is at 20+%. He has hit the ceiling and he cannot go any higher.

10. Trumps approval ratings are up to 40%. Negatives are 60%. He can't go any higher.

11.Head to Head Trump against Hillary and Hillary wins by 20%. Trump can't win the election.

12. Trump's Kelly comments.........he is finished.

13. Trump only appeals to lo-fo voters. He cannot go higher with them.

14. Trump at 30%. He is at his ceiling. These are online polls. They are not accurate.

15. Trump at 38%. Let's quote Q showing him at 28% and running behind Hillary. No one will know.

16. We can't let Trump win. Run a 3rd Party or else support Hillary.

17. The schlong statement is not Presidential. Trump is finished.

18. The bookies are betting against Trump. Bookies are winners so they know what is going on.

19. Trump supporters will not go out and vote.

I wonder what the next round of excuses and rationalizations will be.

149
Politics & Religion / Re: Immigration issues
« on: December 25, 2015, 08:22:00 AM »
This is an attempt to neutralize Trump. Nothing else. Contrary to what the Dems say, they do not want to run against Trump. They would rather have Cruz, who can be easily demonized by his Tea Party connections and therefore be beaten. As to Rubio, they can knock him off as well.

150
Politics & Religion / Re: Donald Trump
« on: December 25, 2015, 08:18:10 AM »
Rebuttal,

So let's see..........

At some point, the new President will be having to engage in negotiations with Putin.  So will Putin be willing to negotiate with someone who has called him a killer? And will this cause him to take a more hardline approach with that person?

Or will Putin respond better to someone who shows a bit of discretion? 

I, for one, would want to negotiate with someone who showed the discretion...................

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 23