Author Topic: Politics  (Read 615316 times)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Politics, young voters, NYT
« Reply #1600 on: October 25, 2023, 09:49:48 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Politics, young voters, NYT
« Reply #1601 on: October 26, 2023, 08:23:47 AM »
https://dnyuz.com/2023/10/24/millennials-and-gen-z-are-tilting-left-and-staying-there/

Disclosure, NYT is usually wrong.

https://tippinsights.com/18-24-year-olds-could-swing-2024-to-trump/

Who does a dynamic, flourishing economy help most?  Those just starting out?

Who does a dying, stagnating economic hurt most?  Those just starting out?

Who does high interest rates hurt the most?  Those hoping to buy their first car, first house?

Who is allegedly going to have to pay for all this excess spending?  The youngest voters among us?

If we had any kind of messaging at all ...  the table has never been set better for victory.





ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1604 on: November 16, 2023, 08:47:21 AM »
Nevada redder?

I dunno.

We see Repubs are slightly ahead pre election a lot, and then at the last minute the unions get all their housekeepers hotel clerks etc out in droves and win the day for  the marxists.

Reid was master at this.

Now he is gone it still seems to occur.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1605 on: November 20, 2023, 07:52:03 AM »
Funny little twist in politics, Black voters understand targeting.

They probably never read about IRS targeting (2012) but everyone can see the targeting of Trump.

https://www.dailyfetched.com/al-sharpton-hits-panic-alarm-over-black-voters-ditching-democrats/

Young voters keep leaning Left from their schooling, but somehow young black voters are emerging with the wisdom to question authority.  In this case the Big Left authority is telling them if you don't vote Democrat, "you ain't black".

Nice to hear people are wise enough to know how insulting that is.

Then there was (same guy), "They're (Republicans) gonna' put you'all back in CHAINS."

But instead black unemployment dropped to the lowest in history with real wage gains surging.  That was after candidate Trump challenged them, "What have you got to lose?"

The party that wanted the police disbanded faces the neighborhoods that are crying for police protection.
------------
Then you have roughly equal numbers of Muslim Americans and Jewish Americans all in the same party wanting opposite policies.  Good luck with that.

Biden approval 40%.  Harris latest approval 29%.  Hard to reverse that with drool spilling on the bully pulpit and fiscal time bombs starting to implode.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/bidens-approval-declines-all-time-low-he-struggles-ahead-2024-election-poll
« Last Edit: November 20, 2023, 08:19:12 AM by DougMacG »


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Politics, podcast, John Ellis, Joe Klein
« Reply #1607 on: January 28, 2024, 08:13:25 AM »
https://substack.news-items.com/p/the-podcast

44 minutes of analysis I found helpful, from NH, SC and the Pres race to AI (AGI) to the border. Two very veteran reporters,  Ellis, Boston Globe, a Bush Sr. admirer. Klein of Time, Newsweek, I think a Clinton insider, wrote 'primary colors'.

Not my bias and I wouldn't send them money but good political insights when free.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1608 on: January 28, 2024, 08:27:19 AM »
Doug,
Seems to be paywalled.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Re: Politics, podcast, John Ellis, Joe Klein
« Reply #1609 on: January 28, 2024, 09:18:03 AM »
https://substack.news-items.com/p/the-podcast

44 minutes of analysis I found helpful, from NH, SC and the Pres race to AI (AGI) to the border. Two very veteran reporters,  Ellis, Boston Globe, a Bush Sr. admirer. Klein of Time, Newsweek, I think a Clinton insider, wrote 'primary colors'.

Not my bias and I wouldn't send them money but good political insights when free.
I had no issue listening to this re paywalls.

Indeed, not my cup of tea, but more than a few bon mots. Heck, anyone that references the “boys on the bus*” along with an anecdote or two will gain my attention, at least to some degree. With that said, these two have certainly hung onto the coat tails of the MSM and political class and it shows.

* https://www.amazon.com/Boys-Bus-Timothy-Crouse/dp/0812968204

A great read!

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Biden Boxes Himself In
« Reply #1610 on: January 28, 2024, 10:39:51 PM »
This could go several places, but given the range of political missteps discussed, I'll drop it in a more generic thread. The points made about LNG futures our allies own and now have to come up with a plan B for are worth mulling:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/biden_the_border_and_tik_tok_too.html?fbclid=IwAR1UcWRjwFEIWPBBrdEMQ2E_uByMLbpZkcO7rGwue0PigvfDo_1LLhi0Bn8

I've communicated with the author a couple times and think she is well worth following.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1611 on: January 29, 2024, 05:00:38 AM »
Love your ongoing efforts in thread coherency  :-D  but not a good fit here.

I would suggest Homeland and Energy Policy as better threads.

As always, when a piece merits, feel free to post it in more than one thread.   Witness for example my double posting just now of a George Friedman piece both in the FUBAR thread and the Iran thread.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2024, 05:10:26 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1612 on: January 29, 2024, 05:27:31 AM »
Love your ongoing efforts in thread coherency  :-D  but not a good fit here.

I would suggest Homeland and Energy Policy as better threads.

As always, when a piece merits, feel free to post it in more than one thread.   Witness for example my double posting just now of a George Friedman piece both in the FUBAR thread and the Iran thread.
Okay. The dual focus on the southern border and the LNG heavy handedness left me thinking threads focusing on either immigration OR energy would give short shrift to the subject not covered by the thread’s title.

Oh well, I’ll keep seeking to sort it out.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1613 on: January 29, 2024, 05:49:00 AM »
The term Politics could cover pretty much everything; I envision the thread more for the ongoing mudslinging, lying, and everyday maneuvers of the players in the political class.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Politics, Israel Hamas US polling
« Reply #1614 on: April 30, 2024, 07:28:38 AM »
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/polling/huge-majority-americans-support-israel-instead-hamas-poll

80% of Americans support Israel instead of Hamas: Harris Poll

The report by the Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll found older voters supported Israel more than younger voters, with over 90% of voters older than 54 claiming they support Israel over Hamas. Among voters aged 45 to 54, 85% said they support Israel, and three quarters of the next bracket down said the same. But among younger voters aged 18-24, just 57% said they support Israel, and 64% of voters 25 to 34 said the same.

The majority of Americans (61%) only want a cease-fire if Hamas is removed from power and the hostages it took are freed. However, 39% support an unconditional cease-fire.

[Doug]  The more recently they've been in a public school classroom, the more anti-Israel they tend to be.

Still it's an 80/20 issue that has Republicans on the right side.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Local Pol on the Border
« Reply #1616 on: July 25, 2024, 09:35:46 PM »
Dang, next state over. I’d vote for her:

https://x.com/joeymannarinous/status/1816163053613822135?s=61

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
https://x.com/watchTENETnow/status/1817711843810381891

less than 2 minutes

BIPOC women have tapped us as white women to step up, listen and get involved in this election...
   ... share some do's and don'ts for getting involved online...

Wikipedia
acronym "BIPOC" refers to "black, indigenous, and other people of color"

I have SO MUCH to learn.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3472
    • View Profile
Party of Peace and All That
« Reply #1618 on: July 30, 2024, 04:31:48 AM »
Gent goes to a Biden rally wearing a Trump shirt and then the reverse. The results are telling.

https://x.com/catturd2/status/1818234803159753053?s=61

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
https://x.com/watchTENETnow/status/1817711843810381891

less than 2 minutes

BIPOC women have tapped us as white women to step up, listen and get involved in this election...
   ... share some do's and don'ts for getting involved online...

Wikipedia
acronym "BIPOC" refers to "black, indigenous, and other people of color"

I have SO MUCH to learn.

Babylon Bee follows up:

https://babylonbee.com/news/black-men-listen-closely-as-liberal-white-women-instruct-them-who-to-vote-for

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
FO: If the Dems take the White House and both houses of Congress
« Reply #1620 on: August 24, 2024, 06:48:07 AM »


(1) SCHUMER OUTLINES POLICIES IN A DEM SWEEP: In a speech at the Democratic National Convention and then in a follow-up interview, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) outlined an aggressive policy platform if Democrats manage to keep the White House, retake the House and keep the Senate.

Schumer predicted Democrats would expand their Senate majority in November, and vowed to eliminate the Senate filibuster to push through a host of programs including:

Price controls for housing and prescription drugs
Expanding the child tax credit
Supporting the proposed
Reforming the Supreme Court, including possible term limits
“Getting rid of Citizens United”
Looking at reapportioning state voting districts (e.g., 53% of Wisconsin voted for Biden but Democrats only control 35% of the state legislature)
Passing the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Bill
Passing a law to overturn the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade

Schumer was pressed a couple of times on his comments. First, Politico’s Rachel Bade said that if Dems pick up a Senate seat, it might be from Florida or Texas. Bade asked Schumer if Democrats would fund those races, to which Schumer replied, “Wait and see.” Bade then pressed Schumer on the Democrats’ proposed plans costing an extra $2 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. Schumer said that a Democratic House and Senate could raise taxes to pay for those programs.

Why It Matters: Schumer’s comments are radically different from the moderate, flag-waving, we’re-all-in-this-together-kumbaya feeling of the Democratic National Convention, where Democrats paraded out military veterans, passed out American flags, and praised law enforcement to appeal to moderate and independent voters. Even Vice President Kamala Harris’s speech appeared toned down, despite her political position to the left of President Biden. Schumer’s bevy of laws and regulations is a sure sign that a Dem sweep, although unlikely, will quickly pivot to the hard left, despite the more moderate tones from this convention. – M.S.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Politics, Young men leaving the Democratic Party
« Reply #1621 on: August 26, 2024, 02:56:18 PM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Politics, double standards
« Reply #1622 on: September 26, 2024, 06:43:51 AM »
Can somebody tell me,

Why is it end of the world for Trump and the entire Republican party to have Gov candidate of NC caught up in an alleged disgrace, but a complete non-factor for Harris and the Dem party to have the Dem Mayor of NYC indicted for corruption?
« Last Edit: September 26, 2024, 05:39:03 PM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1623 on: September 26, 2024, 07:01:11 AM »
good question

it seems the Feds started targeting Adams soon  after he complained of the burden the illegals are putting on NYC.

hmmmm?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1624 on: September 26, 2024, 09:18:01 AM »
Yup.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Taylor Swift Lost 2 Million Spotify Users Since her Kamala Endorsement
« Reply #1625 on: October 03, 2024, 10:35:07 AM »
That's a small number in her world but when in her meteoric rise did she ever lose followers?

It's what we call in math an inflection point.  In music and business generally, when you're not rising, you're falling

https://www.thewrap.com/taylor-swift-loses-listeners-spotify-kamala-harris-endorsement-trump/

Taylor Swift has lost more than 2 million Spotify listeners, according to data that was shared by Chartmetric, a music streaming analytics company, to the outlet The Wrap.

In addition, the number of people viewing Swift’s YouTube videos in the U.S. reportedly dropped nearly 10 percent post-Harris endorsement.
...
 a recent NBC News poll showed Swift’s favorability among all registered voters fell from last year, decreasing from 40 percent in 2023 to 33 percent this year. While 16 percent had negative feelings about her in 2023, 27 percent say they do now.
About 26 percent of independents have a positive attitude toward Swift, a drop from 34 percent in 2023.


[Doug]  Since when do we track favorability ratings of entertainers?  But if so, how is Roger Waters doing?

https://variety.com/2024/music/news/pink-floyd-sells-music-rights-to-sony-400-million-1236165925/
-----------------------

Video of a young Taylor talking politics at this link:  1.5 minutes
https://pjmedia.com/athena-thorne/2024/10/01/is-lana-del-rey-the-anti-taylor-swift-n4932970
« Last Edit: October 03, 2024, 10:46:51 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1626 on: October 03, 2024, 11:10:45 AM »
I think [BS] artist TSwift should be taxed 90% direct to the treasury to pay for Dem policies

While we are at it how about Bezos Zuckerberg, Buffett, Dimon and Gates too.

No one is stopping them from writing huge checks to the Treasury.


Elon should definitely be exempt.

What kind of moron would vote for someone based on her choice anyway?    :roll:


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
The Cheney Biden Harris Love Affair
« Reply #1627 on: October 04, 2024, 01:21:10 PM »
"Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history."  - Sen. Joe Biden D-Del
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-pInQ9PNtM&t=4s
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/biden-seeks-advisory-role-as-vice-president-idUSTRE49T5G9/
------------------------------------

https://x.com/Liz_Cheney/status/1120666096359571456

https://nypost.com/2024/10/03/us-news/all-the-times-ex-gop-rep-liz-cheney-ripped-radical-kamala-harris-before-endorsement/
“Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t,” the Wyoming Republican tweeted that month. “She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance.”  - Liz Cheney

“Joe Biden has really been trying to portray himself as the moderate in this race, as somebody who is centrist, and in one fell swoop here he has put somebody on the ticket whose voting record in the Senate is to the left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren,” she said on “America’s Newsroom.”
   - Liz Cheney

Cheney told a Wyoming NBC affiliate in another August interview that the pick (Kamala Harris) “tells us something about Joe Biden: It tells us that he’s not really leading his party; he’s not really in charge.”  - Liz Cheney

“Every single day, the Democrats tell us what they would do as Kamala Harris put it yesterday, ‘A Harris Administration with Joe Biden,'” she said. “They would defund our police, dismantle our freedom, destroy our history and abandon our founding values.”  - Liz Cheney

“Sounds just like Karl Marx,” she tweeted in response to a video posted by Harris urging Americans to forgo pursuing equality of opportunity for equity of outcomes in all aspects of society.  - Liz Cheney

“A century of history has shown where that path leads. We all embrace equal opportunity, but government-enforced equality of outcomes is Marxism,”   - Liz Cheney

Even after Jan. 6, the House Republican conference chairwoman attacked Harris for being absent on the US border crisis.

“The president has said Vice President Harris is in charge of the border. Vice president Harris said she was not in charge of the border,” Cheney said in a Capitol Hill press conference that April.

“Nobody seems to be in charge. She hasn’t been there. And we have a humanitarian and national security crisis and health crisis unfolding there.” - Liz Cheney

“Coming soon: ⁦@KamalaHarris and ⁦@BernieSanders launch their ‘Absentee ballots for al Qaeda’ program,” Cheney (R-Wyo.), then the House GOP conference chair, zinged on Twitter, now X, after the televised   - Liz Cheney

Strange bedfellows

Vice President Dick Cheney, Vice President elect Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden pose for photos on Capitol Hill.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13925145/Kamala-Harris-Dick-Cheney-Liz-Cheney-campaign.html
« Last Edit: October 04, 2024, 01:27:49 PM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1628 on: October 04, 2024, 05:31:08 PM »
Great compilation!

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Hispanics trending right
« Reply #1630 on: October 05, 2024, 12:39:13 AM »
If really true then how could trump still be essentially tied. 

Wasn’t this the bush-Cheney doctrine.   We can’t or shouldn’t try to stem the tide of illegals so best to win them over? How is that working out?     

I was also thinking that if I asked some democrats, let’s face it, if the illegals coming in were mostly suspected future Republican voters you would be as Ann counter has said lined up at the border arms linked in a 1500 mile chain to block them.   The democrats would likely respond , let’s face it, if they were likely dem voters you would be shipping them in as fast as possible .   But I would NOT say or believe this.   We simply can’t have an open border with people simply walking in and having our border protection be welcoming agents .    The country is NOT a country without borders .   The dems would be wrong.    Soros is wrong.   

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
"Trump voters are being stupid", and you're the smart one?
« Reply #1631 on: October 06, 2024, 07:55:59 AM »
A friend said, not to me but within earshot, Trump voters lack the information, need to read more.

To my face someone close said, [experts] "know a hell of a lot more than you do".  Said by someone who also doesn't trust "experts".

SO many more examples...

Now this: 'Trump voters are being stupid', "need to wake up".
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/10/03/michael_steele_upset_voters_may_reelect_trump_stop_being_stupid_people_the_country_needs_to_wake_itself_up_out_of_this_stupor.html

Just for the record, I don't need to read more, in comparison to the person who said that, experts don't have a great track record on economics, vote fraud or much of anything else, and I'm not "stupid". :wink:

The reason we have Trump at all prominent on the national scene is because of failed Democrat governance and because of RINOs failure to successfully put forward an alternative.  The reason we had a January 6 riot is because Democrats did everything possible to lose our confidence in the outcome and Republicans in power did nothing to investigate or stop them.  It didn't happen because of Trump saying "go peacefully...".

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1632 on: October 06, 2024, 08:04:31 AM »
" A friend said, not to me but within earshot, Trump voters lack the information, need to read more "

Where does one read?  The MSM academics are so biased one can read  and listen to them and know less.

typical attitude.

 :roll:

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
"Money in Politics"
« Reply #1633 on: November 04, 2024, 06:29:37 AM »
Strange, isn't it, that we never hear about the dangers of "money in politics" now that Democrats dominate the raising and spending of money in politics in every category.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1634 on: November 04, 2024, 06:44:34 AM »
"... intelligence being the ability to hold mutually exclusive thoughts at the same time."

  - This brings another thought to mind.

Second level thinking.

I watched Sen Mark Kelly go on Fox News Sunday to make the case for Kamala.  His points, including the lies and untruth, were quite persuasive, as long as no one follows it with second level thinking.

Time permitting later, maybe I will post and respond to the he points he made.

Easy example just mentioned is pro choice.  Why wouldn't you want every woman to have complete control over her body, but can't the also add the context, 'even though there is another human life involved'.

Another was "inflation is way down".  But the point is "prices" for what we buy, not just 'rate of change'.  Prices are still going up, on top of what they already went up.

He knows that but doesn't say that. Deceit and condescension that comes out sounding like rational common sense.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Money in politics
« Reply #1635 on: November 04, 2024, 07:05:43 AM »
"Strange, isn't it, that we never hear about the dangers of "money in politics" now that Democrats dominate the raising and spending of money in politics in every category."

Speaking of (I just happened to read up on this just this AM):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActBlue

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1636 on: November 04, 2024, 07:08:52 AM »
"Easy example just mentioned is pro choice.  Why wouldn't you want every woman to have complete control over her body, but can't the also add the context, 'even though there is another human life involved'."

O'Reilly also stated in his broadcast that after the townhall he mentioned about another body being involved he was told by someone (he would not name) that if they said 'another body is involved' on the air they would be fired within 24 hrs from the MSM.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
MSNBC 5 Questions for 2025
« Reply #1637 on: January 02, 2025, 06:44:19 AM »
They at least have the questions right.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-news-2025-questions-rcna185751

1. Are Republicans interested in governing?
2. Which of his promises will Trump keep?
3. Who will emerge as the Democrat leader?
4. What will the courts do?
5. Will the wars end?

(Doug).
1. Slim majorities and differing opinions make what Congress will do a big question. They already plan to postpone the big vote on big issues, delaying the economic comeback, perhaps too long to help them in the midterm elections where the deck is stacked against them.
2. Trump will try to keep all of his serious promises, but there are constraints and resistance. There will be a world of difference in border security. There will be improvements in drilling and energy prices.  Hopefully nuclear power, but the benefits are 10 years out. With deregulation and reform of the agencies, there will be improvements but not lasting unless they win a series of elections.
3. No leader of the Democrat Party will emerge in 2025. The leaders of the moment will be the resistance in Congress, Hakeem Jeffries, Adam Schiff, AOC, etc. They are a long way from deciding who will be their next real leader.
4. The Court will follow the Constitution. Each case is entirely predictable, as Dobbs was in hindsight.
5. The war in Ukraine will end one way or another, and the war in the Middle East will run its course, end for now. New wars are less likely to start under Trump than under Biden or Harris, but not fully under our control.

The party in power is likely to lose seats in Congress in 2026. This can be mitigated or avoided only by governing really well right out of the gate and getting positive results from it, especially on the economy.

By 2027-2028 the Republican party will be able to make a strong argument that they brought peace and prosperity into the next presidential election, but there may be a big fight over who leads Republicans from there.

Democrats will not have a unified leader emerge before 2028. Someone will win the primaries and nomination anyway.

And then we must figure in the unknown unknowns...
« Last Edit: January 02, 2025, 06:51:33 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Politics
« Reply #1638 on: January 02, 2025, 09:28:18 AM »
1:  We need to make and drive home the point that but for counting aliens (illegal and legal) in apportioning seats in the House among the states has tilted the balance of power approximately some 15 seats towards the Dems.

5:  Full spectrum war is already underway.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: MSNBC 5 Questions for 2025
« Reply #1639 on: January 03, 2025, 07:34:44 AM »
Yesterday:  "The leaders of the moment will be the resistance in Congress, Hakeem Jeffries, Adam Schiff, AOC, etc."

Today: "Schumer appoints Adams shift to powerful Senate Judiciary Committee"

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/01/03/schumer-appoints-adam-schiff-to-powerful-senate-judiciary-committee/

Isn't he the one who lied about everything and perjured himself throughout the entire Trump first term?

Shameless.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Forked Tongue Warren offers to work with Reps
« Reply #1640 on: January 13, 2025, 03:58:08 PM »
Pieces of this intrigue , , ,

Elizabeth Warren: If Trump Wants to Unrig the Economy, I’m In
I will lead Democrats on the Banking Committee to lower costs, advance security and cut red tape.
By Elizabeth Warren
Jan. 13, 2025 4:26 pm ET


The mission of the Democrats on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee is to deliver what Americans have asked for in election after election: unrigging the economy to make life more affordable for working families.

I’m ready to work with Chairman Tim Scott, Donald Trump and business leaders whenever they support policies that rebuild the middle class, advance our economic and national security, and fight the corruption of those who seek to use government to enrich themselves. We have at least four specific tasks ahead.

First, we must lower costs and improve access to financial services. Last year housing costs reached the highest level in decades. Conservatives who believe this is a supply problem are right. Liberals who believe price fixing and corporate landlords are culprits are also right. Congress has been asleep at the switch on both fronts.

Our committee should pursue serious federal investment to create incentives for home construction, establish partnerships with local communities to cut red tape, and take on Wall Street landlords that are squeezing families out of local markets. The Federal Reserve, after driving mortgage rates to their highest levels since 2008, should cut rates further. The Trump administration can help by transferring or selling unused federal property to local actors to increase supply. We should avoid anything that risks raising housing prices, such as privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a way that rewards Wall Street while inflating the cost of borrowing.

We should continue President Biden’s popular fights against junk fees, corporate consolidation and price gouging. Mr. Trump one-upped Democrats by proposing to cap credit-card rates at 10%. I’ll work with Republicans to make it happen. If the president-elect is serious about protecting consumers, he should support the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s work to lower costs. Since 2011, the bureau has returned more than $20 billion to customers who were cheated by credit-card companies and financial institutions, and it’s fighting to protect conservatives from discrimination by banks. Outside corporate C-suites, it’s loved by Americans of all political stripes.

Second, we must advance economic and national security. Our committee has key responsibilities over export controls, sanctions, trade policy, corporate transparency, domestic supply chains and other levers to support our economic security at home and promote our values abroad. I’ll support the Trump administration if it uses these tools responsibly. That includes helping American industry grow and preventing terrorists from exploiting our financial system—not doing favors for corporate lobbyists or countries that don’t share our values.

Third, we must ensure that our financial system serves families and the real economy. Community lenders provide the majority of loans to the small businesses that power our economy, but these small lenders are getting swallowed by too-big-to-fail banks. This consolidation stifles competition and access to credit. Meanwhile, private-equity raiders continue to hollow out businesses and communities by buying up everything from grocery stores to hospitals—again killing competition.

Risk is building in the system. Too-big-to-fail banks are quietly taking on riskier investments. The shadowy private credit market has loaded up on highly leveraged loans. And after waves of catastrophic losses, the insurance industry faces a reckoning that even climate-change deniers can’t ignore. Without significant changes, another financial crash is coming.

The committee must address these risks. We can pass the Recoup Act, which would reduce incentives for risk-taking by clawing back compensation from bank executives who got big paychecks while their banks failed. We can build on the work JD Vance and I did in the Senate to hold bank regulators accountable when their solution to bank failures is to arrange more megabank mergers. And we can establish common-sense rules for artificial intelligence, blockchain technology and fintech to promote stability and ensure that innovation serves all consumers, investors and business—not only billionaires and big banks, and certainly not terrorists.

And yes, we should simplify financial regulations. Republicans are right that regulatory complexity can drive up costs and hurt smaller companies that don’t have armies of lobbyists. Simpler structural rules such as Glass-Steagall would eliminate a mountain of paperwork and end the need for regulators to intrude into businesses. Clearer rules would create more transparency and give Americans across the country simpler access to public markets.

Finally, we must be vigilant against so-called reforms that make it easier for Wall Street to rip off consumers or crash the financial system. Three of the four largest bank failures in our history occurred in 2023. These failures came in the wake of reforms that encouraged regulators to ease up too much. Similarly, tariffs and sanctions are powerful tools that we can use to protect consumers and our security, but they can also be exploited to dole out corporate welfare to well-connected businessmen or protect monopolies. Our job is to ask hard questions of companies, regulators and officials who put their own interests ahead of the public’s.

When I was a kid, my daddy lost his job and our family teetered on the edge of losing our home. My life’s work has focused on reducing the obstacles families face to build a better future. That’s why I came to Washington in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, started the CFPB and became a senator. I’ll continue that work in my role on the Banking Committee.

Ms. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, is ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee.