Author Topic: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media  (Read 1211419 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Drudge: ****"Florida"*** jury to decide lawsuit against CNN
« Reply #4350 on: January 06, 2025, 07:33:01 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/a-florida-jury-will-decide-if-cnn-defamed-security-contractor/ar-AA1x2b91

Funny, I don't recall a headline with "NEW YORK" jury to decide Trump in Carrol case or for that matter the Bragg case.

Hopefully, the jury will come up with 100 million $ verdict against CNN.  I would love to see how they feel about it.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
But did Enrich publish an article in the NYT explaining his regret past mistakes and of the MSM about this?

NYT would probably not publish it anyway.

Would he go on Newsmax or Fox to admit his contrition to the world .  Probably would not even if it meant he would not lose his NYT gig.

These occasional sort of, kind of, in round about way mea culpas are totally unsatisfactory .

The MSM is till full of partisan BS.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Left wing media, Another One Bites the Dust
« Reply #4354 on: January 13, 2025, 08:06:20 AM »
HuffPost Editor-in-Chief Resigns as Part of Ongoing Newsroom Layoffs

https://www.thewrap.com/huffpost-editor-in-chief-resigns-layoffs-danielle-belton/

More:
Jen Rubin "Exits" the Washington Post; Chuck Todd "Exits" NBC
https://ace.mu.nu/archives/413221.php

https://freebeacon.com/media/trumps-worst-nightmare/

Ms. Rubin demonstrates her objectivity:
"Republicans want to kill your kids. It's actually true," she said. "It has to be that simple and that direct..."
------
Ironic how true the opposite is. Democrats want you to be able to kill your own (unborn), anytime, for any reason.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2025, 03:00:10 PM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Jews who live for their beloved party
« Reply #4355 on: January 13, 2025, 06:57:20 PM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ar-BB1rnvx7

ironic Contrarian

is the new name

contrary to majority of people contrary to logic

this will only attract a few Jewish Democrats and never Trumpers.

at most in thousands.

not a good business

Lose at the WP because you were too demonically left wing so go out and try to do the same thing on your own   -   does this make good business sense to anyone?


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Corrupt News Network Loses Defamation Suit
« Reply #4356 on: January 17, 2025, 10:49:07 PM »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Second Verse, Same as the First
« Reply #4357 on: January 22, 2025, 12:30:45 PM »
The MSM, still amplifying talking points from the same "Progressive" pages:

Same Old. Same Old.

ERICK-WOODS ERICKSON

JAN 22, 2025

NBC News reports Pete Hegseth’s former sister-in-law has come forward with an affidavit claiming Hegseth abused his ex-wife. The sister-in-law says she was advised that filing the affidavit would scuttle Hegseth’s nomination by getting fence-sitting senators to vote against him.

Instead of asking who told her that, the press corps rushed to report and amplify the story. Here’s a key detail: Hegseth’s ex-wife denies the allegations, saying she did not push her sister to speak up and wants reporters to leave her alone.

Elon Musk told a crowd at an inaugural event, “My heart goes out to you.” He then grabbed his chest with his hand then flung his arm out towards the crowd as if throwing his heart to the crowd. The press, led by PBS, rushed with “some say” it was a Nazi salute. The PBS reporter says it was a “Heil Hitler” gesture.

The inauguration was running behind schedule, and the president needed to take the oath of office as close to noon as possible. Chief Justice John Roberts, rushing things, started administering the oath before Melania Trump could get situated with the family Bible. As a result, Trump did not have his hand on the Bible, and the press corps reported it as Trump failing to place his hand on the Bible.

These people have learned nothing.

Joe Biden walks out of office and pre-emptively pardons his family members with an oddly specific start date for the pardons. No one in the press wants to investigate. They have simply taken it as an article of faith that this was to prevent harassment by Trump, which Biden claimed. But Biden also claimed he was mentally ready for the job, and we all saw that was a lie.

The press corps has learned nothing and forgotten nothing. We will get four years of outrage-driven coverage. We will not get probative, thoughtful press analysis. It will all be driven by Democrat-seeded talking points.

The Elon Musk one is the one that really drives this home. There are numerous examples of Democrats throwing their hands in the air like a Hitler salute, and no one, left, right, center, or in the press, accused them of doing it. But Elon declares his heart goes out to the crowd and flings out his arm away from his chest and we are all supposed to believe it was a Hitler salute or we’re apologists for Nazis.

I don’t know how Trump made so many people turn into drooling morons, but he managed to make it happen, and the biggest morons are the American political press — generally lazy people who like to be spoon-fed from a left-leaning hive mind.

Welcome back after four years. Hope you reporters had a great vacation and are lubed up well so the DNC can muppet you. In the meantime, I have to say this is not just predictable. It’s a bit boring.

https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/same-old-same-old?r=2k0c5&fbclid=IwY2xjawH-Ms5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHSRIObBG78a2TfLj-ENecrzCAKk2v4z6VVR8yBLoDNKZuCg-ICKFKAk1Iw_aem_dVi5xw9FivK1EvrniwZv-g&triedRedirect=true

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
About that "Nazi" Salute
« Reply #4358 on: January 22, 2025, 05:27:23 PM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth, NYT recognizes the unborn "child"
« Reply #4359 on: January 26, 2025, 07:16:52 AM »
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/01/25/nyt-a-fetus-is-just-a-clump-of-cells-if-they-america-it-is-a-child-if-the-mother-is-undocumented-n3799149

Reminds me of Justice Breyer referring to the pregnant person in a case as a mother. Mother of what, prior children?

PS. I thought I was being clever to downgrade a pregnant woman to a 'person', but my woke keyboard app came up with 'person' as the most likely word to follow pregnant. Good grief.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth, NYT recognizes the unborn "child"
« Reply #4360 on: January 26, 2025, 06:06:07 PM »
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/01/25/nyt-a-fetus-is-just-a-clump-of-cells-if-they-america-it-is-a-child-if-the-mother-is-undocumented-n3799149

Reminds me of Justice Breyer referring to the pregnant person in a case as a mother. Mother of what, prior children?

PS. I thought I was being clever to downgrade a pregnant woman to a 'person', but my woke keyboard app came up with 'person' as the most likely word to follow pregnant. Good grief.

College I work at allows, heck basically solicits, the use of personal pronouns in the university directory. So far my attempts to add “Take a wild guess” have been stymied….

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Jim Acost[ing] out at CNN
« Reply #4361 on: January 28, 2025, 06:26:18 AM »
https://www.status.news/p/jim-acosta-leaving-cnn?_bhlid=50af1afa3a8d45aa95f83beab4c8da9133d8ccc2

Republican/Trump accosting will show up somewhere of course.  Can't get rid of these people.

Seeing the push to have Andrew Cuomo back as Mayor of NYC too.

Weiner running for City Council. 


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

"So far my attempts to add “Take a wild guess” have been stymied…."

This is very funny.

Reminds me of when on Race questions on forms I select "Other" and fill in "Human".

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Zang!!!
« Reply #4363 on: January 28, 2025, 04:14:04 PM »
New White House Spokeswoman throws one back at the MSM that’ll leave a mark:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/971919017777905

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes, Believe Our Lying Photo Copping
« Reply #4364 on: January 28, 2025, 07:01:08 PM »
2nd post.

New York Rag, er Mag complains only white people attended a Trump party, using a photo to prove the point and that required them to crop out black folks in the shot:

https://nypost.com/2025/01/28/media/ny-magazine-ripped-for-cropping-black-people-from-trump-party-cover/

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
The Newly Pwned MSM
« Reply #4365 on: January 29, 2025, 04:35:59 PM »
Behold: a fine series of excoriations indeed:

How conservatives own the media
Prepare for the interview. Don't accept their premise. Be cool, calm and collected.
JAN 29, 2025

Who owns the media? J.D. Vance.

VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t want my children to share a neighborhood with people who are not properly vetted, and because I don’t want it for my kids, I'm not going to force any other American citizens kids to do that either.

MARGARET BRENNAN: No. And that was a very particular case. It wasn’t clear if he was radicalized when he got here or while he was living here, but.

VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t really care, Margaret. I don’t want that person in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.

Who owns the media? Stephen Miller.

JAKE TAPPER: How are you going to avoid deporting illegal immigrants working in agriculture?

STEPHEN MILLER: Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destinations for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles.

JAKE TAPPER: You’re kinda changing this subject.

STEPHEN MILLER: Give me 30 minutes, I’ll go as deep as you want.

Who owns the media? Karoline Leavitt.

REPORTER: Of the 3,500 arrests ICE has made so far since President Trump came back onto office, can you just tell me the numbers? How many have a criminal record versus those who are in the country illegally?

KAROLINE LEAVITT: All of them because they are criminals as far as this administration goes.

There are many other examples of this polite pushback by conservatives, and that is just in the first 10 days of President Trump’s new and improved presidency.

For decades, the media ran roughshod over conservatives who foolishly allowed it. They let reporters set the agenda and frame the facts.

Russiagate was a conspiracy theory concocted by Democrats to cover up Obama using the FBI to spy on Donald Trump. Conservatives blew the chance to flip the table and point out the spying on Trump. Instead of investigating the real scandal of spying, the government investigated an imaginary scandal.

No more. Before they go on television, conservatives are doing their homework and anticipating questions, which they reframe. In Miller’s case, he prepared for the question and also for the follow-up. His reply—“Give me 30 minutes, I’ll go as deep as you want”—was a knockout punch.

In each case, the interviewed conservative kept calm and carried on. By controlling their emotions, they remained in control of the interview.

Scott Jennings has turned his gig as a token conservative on CNN panels into stardom.

Brigitte Gabriel tweeted:

This is so good.

Scott Jennings provokes Maria Cardona into an unhinged outburst over who runs the Executive Branch.

“The Department of Justice does not work for the President!”

“It’s in the Executive Branch!”

Nick Adams tweeted:

CNN’s Ashley Allison walked right into this one with Scott Jennings!

“By your logic. If Joe Biden wanted to go after Donald Trump, the Attorney General should able to do it.”

“They DID go after Donald Trump!”

In his case, Jennings exploits the vacuity of their arguments. Liberals enter the debate with emotions, not facts. They do so because they are never challenged and never developed proper debating skills.

Conservatives have scars, baby. They bring the receipts.

Of course, this goes beyond interviews and commentaries. President Trump sued Disney’s ABC for defamation and won a $15 million settlement with another $1 million for his lawyers. This was hush money to use the network’s phrase from his criminal trial om which New York tried him for a crime for which there was no jail time, no fine and no probation despite 34 verdicts of guilt.

A president’s chances of prevailing in a defamation suit are about as good as Ethiopia landing the first man on Mars. And yet the network paid him off. That has emboldened others to demand satisfaction.

Christopher F. Rufo tweeted, “WINNING: The Washington Post's latest hit piece against me has collapsed. Education editor Adam Kushner admits to publishing four false statements about my work and has officially retracted them. This is a supreme embarrassment for the newspaper and reporter.”

More importantly, it is one less defamation lawsuit Jeff Bezos will have to settle out of court.

We call it winning and it works everywhere. On October 14, 2023, Pierre Poilievre became the first opposition leader in Canada whom Americans have ever been able to name.

He did so by posting on Twitter an interview he gave to a hapless Don Urquhart, editor of the Times Chronicle newspaper in the South Okanagan, while munching an apple.

URQUHART: Uhmm, on the topic, I mean, in terms of your, sort of, strategy currently, you’re obviously taking the populist pathway.

POILIEVRE: What does that mean?

URQUHART: (nervous chuckle) Well, appealing to people’s more emotional levels, I would guess —

POILIEVRE: Whaddaya mean by that? Give me an example.

URQUHART: Certainly you, certainly you tap, ah, very strong ideological language quite frequently.

POILIEVRE: Like what?

URQUHART: Uhh, left wing, y’know, this and that, right-wing, they, you know, I mean, it’s that type of (unintelligible) —

POILIEVRE: I almost never talk about — I never really talk about left or right. I don’t really believe in that.

URQUHART: A lot of people would say that you’re simply taking a page out of the Donald Trump, uh, book —

POILIEVRE: A lot of people? Like which people would say that? (puzzled chomp)

URQUHART: Well, I’m sure — a great many Canadians, but

POILIEVRE: Like who?

URQUHART: Haha, uh, I don’t know who, but

POILIEVRE: Well, you’re the one who asked the question, so you must know somebody.

URQUHART: Heh heh, okay, I’m, I’m sure there’s some out there, but anyways, the point of this question is, why should, why should Canadians trust you with their vote, given … y’know … not, not just the sort of ideological inclination in terms of taking the page out of Donald Trump’s book, but, also —

POILIEVRE: (incredulous) What are you talking about? What page? What page? Can you gimme a page? Gimme the page.

That is the most famous apple since the one on the head of William Tell’s son.

The media is dying for numerous reasons. They are too large and too cumbersome. They also believe they are entitled to access and a monopoly on the news. They have underestimated their competition, much to the delight and advantage of the smaller and better outlets that have entered the tournament.

But most of all, mainstream reporters do not do their homework and are too obvious with their biases, which renders them ineffective. Conservatives own them now by refusing to play their game by their rules—and smiling as they deliver their knockout punches.

https://donsurber.substack.com/p/how-conservatives-own-the-media?r=1qo1e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
All of those put a wag in my tail.

A word on Miller-- in the past he was smeared and handicapped by the fact he looks like central casting for an SS concentration camp guard.  Always bright, but prone to getting irked.  Today with Tapper he showed a growth similar to Trump's growth in staying centered and showing some flashes of witty snark.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
America’s Dying Media Elite
« Reply #4367 on: January 29, 2025, 11:52:44 PM »
A fine overview of the current state of US media … as much of it circles the drain:

Welcome to the New Media Reality in America
This year brings a hard wakeup call for legacy media
BEN DOMENECH
JAN 29, 2025

My cover story in The Spectator is out today:

It was nearly 2 a.m. on the East Coast in the middle of election night when CNN’s Jake Tapper stood across from professional virtual-map operator John King and asked a simple question: “Are there any places where Kamala Harris overperformed from where Biden did?”

Tapping away from a view of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, King zoomed out to a view of the entire United States and hit a key to show a comparison to the 2020 election. The map instantly turned a solid dark gray, without a single county highlighted.

“Holy smokes,” Tapper gasped. “Literally nothing? Literally not one county?”

“Literally nothing,” was King’s somber reply.

The video, shared widely and instantly on X, has been viewed more than 13 million times. In the final tally, of course, Harris did outperform Biden in a handful of counties — but Tapper’s stunned response in the moment serves as an authentic expression of the media reaction to the 2024 election: utter shock.

It’s a different kind of shock to the system than 2016, though. Then, the possibility that Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton was completely discounted. In 2024, media figures were so concerned that he might pull it off after Joe Biden’s disastrous June debate (moderated with steadily increasing disconcertion by Tapper and Dana Bash) that some openly pushed for his replacement, then rushed to aid and abet the Democratic storyline that Kamala Harris had transformed herself into a generational political talent.

It was a desperate move — and it didn’t work. The smarter analysts, even those with a partisan lean, saw the truth written on the wall well before November 5. Unfortunately, precious few of them work in cable news — and with the neutron bomb of Trump’s election victory, there will be even less budget in the industry for their commentary.

The 2016 election flooded the legacy media with attentive new consumers who saw subscribing to the “Democracy dies in darkness” Washington Post as a matter of personal pride. They scrambled to order the rushed #Resistance tomes of anonymous heel-turn staffers and strident Trump critics who feverishly pimped their ghostwritten words on television, podcasts and National Public Radio. But the 2024 election seems to sound the final knell for an industry that managed to hang on well past its prime.

The announcements came rapidly: lay-offs industry-wide jarred legacy institutions. After Jeff Bezos announced that the Washington Post would not be endorsing a presidential candidate, the newspaper lost more than 300,000 subscribers, cut more than 100 staffers and saw a dozen prominent reporters and editors walk — mostly for jobs at the now stridently left-wing Atlantic and the financially secure Wall Street Journal. Some of the biggest names in television suddenly found their contracts on the chopping block, opting for diminished roles or exiting entirely. CBS announced that Norah O’Donnell’s Evening News program, which had some of the most screeching anti-Trump coverage of any broadcast network (including opening a broadcast by suggesting he brought a second assassination attempt upon himself with anti-immigrant rhetoric), would be put on ice after the inauguration. Hoda Kotb left NBC’s Today show after seventeen years, and Andrea Mitchell signed off from the MSNBC program she’d anchored for sixteen. Alisyn Camerota, a ten-year CNN host who gained prominence for challenging the first Trump administration, headed toward the exit as her avowedly anti-Trump colleague Chris Wallace announced a sudden interest in the world of online streaming. Wallace’s representatives made sure to stress that CNN asked him to stay, leaving out the inconvenient fact that it was at a much, much lower price.

Perhaps Wallace’s interest in independence will work out for the seventy-seven-year-old. If 2008 was the Facebook election, and 2016 was the Twitter election, 2024 was the podcast election — when the media witnessed for the first time how much its power had been sapped away, its audiences stolen by more interesting formats as people tired of news chyrons that always begin with “BREAKING.” Today’s consumers want their news uncensored: in bite-sized snippets of video on X, Elon Musk’s everything app; in rebel journalism and truly independent commentary on Substack; or the free-wheeling venue of longform podcast interviews. Donald Trump’s marathon conversations with Theo Von, Andrew Schulz, Logan Paul, Barstool Sports and, of course, Joe Rogan have to be considered a key aspect of his resounding appeal among the young male electorate — the same ones most likely to have cut the TV cord, if they ever had it. And with that shift in eyes and ears comes newfound power for individual hosts and compelling personalities who don’t fit the industry’s demo for pharmaceutical products, retirement plans and walk-in bathtubs. MSNBC and CNBC staffers reacted with shock to the post-election news that Comcast planned to spin off their shrinking cable channels to a new company. Perhaps they should have realized that the digs at 30 Rock run on eyeballs. Good luck on the commute to New Jersey.

The industry-wide legacy-media crack-up is also an ironic consequence of its own bet on its influence over the billionaire class. When dollars started to dry up in the aftermath of the financial crisis and dramatic changes to the advertising-based business model of the Obama years, many media entities were more than happy to look to the mega-rich for succor. Bezos’s quarter billion-dollar purchase of the Post in 2013 and Patrick Soon-Shiong’s half billion-dollar purchase of the LA Times in 2018 were generally viewed as a boon, an example of the civically-minded billionaire class stepping up to bail out financially struggling media organizations. The neoliberal values of Silicon Valley were generally shared with big media’s editorial employees — and they seemed content to let the press do whatever it wanted. It’s fine to be a hood ornament for the billionaires, media executives decided, if it keeps the lights on and pays the overpriced and out-of-touch columnists who built a career on flattering subscribers by never disagreeing with them in the slightest.

Yet there’s always a point where the people who got very rich by paying attention to how it happens take a greater interest in the bottom line — and how much the media disagrees hypocritically with the same free-speech values they claim to uphold. After the eruption of racial strife and the increasingly divisive gender politics during the Covid pandemic, owners of media companies discovered that funding all these salaries, promising millions to diversity, equity and inclusion agendas, and even tolerating calls for censorship did not serve to purchase indulgences from the loudest people in the newsroom or the HR department. Owners tired of the assumption that they existed to fund the work of people they no longer viewed as worth supporting. And they became increasingly open to the idea there could be no profit or peace in funding the creaky voice of the entrenched illiberal left.

Elon Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter in 2022 started the cascade. A mega-purchase that began almost as a joke turned into a historically transformative event, not just for American politics but for worldwide media and culture. Musk’s decision-making style didn’t just drive away the media’s “blue check” elites howling about loss of influence and the rise of “misinformation,” it pushed the Overton Window on the possibilities super-rich tech men (and yes, they are all men, Mackenzie Scott and Laurene Powell Jobs didn’t build that) could consider despite the braying of the legacy news horde.

The Obama-Biden Democrats assumed they would have the fealty of this cohort, thinking the arrangement — you pay to fund our “woke” liberal policies, and pay the tenured editorialists and midwit commentators who espouse them; in exchange we give you the soft regulatory touch and Wall Street-boosting policies that let your wealth grow to immense proportion — was to everyone’s benefit. (Everyone, it turned out, but the American worker… and American security… and traditional American culture.) But the far left became increasingly emboldened and aggressive. During the pandemic, when they pushed for steps that made these leaders of industry decidedly uncomfortable, it became unavoidably clear: a new deal was in order. This time around, the tech executives from Google, Apple, Meta and more wouldn’t just meet with Trump, they’d seek to influence him. And they’d respond to the new reality by putting loud illiberals back in their place, daring them to post their principled walkouts on Bluesky.

Last October, when Bezos and Soon-Shiong separately made clear that their newspapers wouldn’t be endorsing Kamala Harris, the media reacted with the measured restraint of a pro-Hamas protester dousing himself in kerosene and flicking on a lighter. Editorial board members, editors and columnists announced their defiant resignations. (The Post’s Jennifer Rubin, who repeatedly hailed the LA Times resignations and demanded to know why others had not joined them, experienced a sudden change of heart and decided the world could ill afford her committing career seppuku at such a challenging moment.) Kara Swisher, the aviator-clad advocate for ever-increasing Silicon Valley censorship, announced she was seeking an alternate group of rich investors to help her buy the Post and save it from Bezos’s clutches. No word on if she had any takers — besides the fact that Bezos has shown no interest in selling. Instead, Amazon is spending $40 million for the rights to Melania Trump’s bio — to be directed by Brett Ratner, back again after the end of #MeToo.

Swisher isn’t alone in letting the new reality get the best of her. Thanks to remarks by George Stephanopoulos, ABC’s chief political anchor and Good Morning America co-host, ABC announced post-election that it would pay $15 million in response to a defamation suit from Trump — money they said would go to help fund his presidential library. (Perhaps it will build a wing on his relationship with the media.) There’s still a lawsuit pending against CBS News over a deceptively edited interview with Kamala Harris broadcast on 60 Minutes, though no word on if they’ll settle in court or settle for the outskirts of covering the administration for the next four years.

Yet if Swisher’s approach to the media shift and Trump’s victory is the bonkers end of the desperation scale, and ABC’s apology is a middle course of grudging surrender, the more diplomatic end is found in the married hosts of MSNBC’s most grandiloquent show: Morning Joe, whose Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough rushed to Mar-a-Lago to pledge their loyalty to their new Trumpian overlords. “Joe and I realized it’s time to do something different… and that starts with not only talking about Donald Trump, but also talking with him,” Brzezinski announced, citing her diplomat father Zbigniew Brzezinski for speaking “with world leaders with whom he and the United States profoundly disagreed.”

Of course, that positioning is utterly inauthentic — so perhaps a better example of a media maven who learned the lessons of the past few years is Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, who switched from running to mixed martial arts and Brazilian jiujitsu during the pandemic. It turns out a few years in that based subculture was all it took to make someone who could once speak the language of corporate Democratic neoliberalism fluently to audiences from Aspen to Davos sound completely different. Announcing an end to Meta’s media-funding fact-checking project that involved “too many mistakes and too much censor- ship,” Zuckerberg committed to working with President Trump to push back on censorship regimes in China, Europe and Latin America. “It’s been so difficult over the past four years,” he said, frustration written on his face, “when even the US government has pushed for censorship.”

Zuckerberg’s half right: it wasn’t just the government — it was the media themselves, who pressed for the silencing of those who dared to disagree with them or their agenda. They wanted to be unassailable, and they were willing to wield the ring of power to that purpose. They got away with it at first, but that’s what 2024 corrected: it has at long last forced America’s dying media elite to realize the power to silence has slipped from their grasp — hopefully, for good.

https://thetransom.com/p/welcome-to-the-new-media-reality

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: The Newly Pwned MSM
« Reply #4368 on: January 30, 2025, 06:30:36 AM »
Wow, this is phenomenal.

It also comes down to how we respond to Leftism, wokism and falsisms at the micro level. Sometimes I react with silence, sometimes with angry arguing back, but most effective is when I listen to a point and answer with a subtle, penetrating question or point back that breaks the premise of what was presented. This past week traveling with friends, my wonderful host at dinner in their home went on a run expressing concern for the plight of the "LGDTQ people" (presumably because of the harsh new administration). At the end I pointed out the new Secretary of Treasury is gay. She gave a puzzled look back, what do you mean? I said, well the Secretary of Treasury is a pretty high position and we have the first gay in that position. (A small fact that means all gays won't be swept under the carpet and stepped on.) The discussion suddenly moved past politics.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media
« Reply #4371 on: February 01, 2025, 05:27:06 AM »
Oooooh, this could be really good.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Trump Now Correcting the MSM on White House Site
« Reply #4372 on: February 01, 2025, 09:24:15 AM »
In a new move, White House has began tracking and releasing corrections to MSM inaccuracies and outright lies:

https://x.com/mirandadevine/status/1884589976643325978

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media
« Reply #4373 on: February 01, 2025, 09:33:44 AM »
Very astute OODA Loop move!

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
CBS Agrees to Release Unedited 60 Minutes Harris Interview
« Reply #4374 on: February 01, 2025, 01:34:39 PM »
They will argue “editorial judgement,” no doubt. Hopefully we’ll get to make that call:

https://nypost.com/2025/02/01/media/cbs-to-hand-over-60-minutes-harris-interview-transcript-to-trumps-fcc-pick-brendan-carr/

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: CBS Agrees to Release Unedited 60 Minutes Harris Interview
« Reply #4375 on: February 01, 2025, 03:35:14 PM »
They missed something there.

"CBS Agrees to Release Unedited 60 Minutes Harris Interview"  - BEFORE the Election!!

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media
« Reply #4376 on: February 01, 2025, 06:01:12 PM »
Free Beacon:

"But that industry (semiconductors) is not nearly the most important reason for defending Taiwan. If China takes the island, it will have a base that dominates the shipping lanes Japan and South Korea rely on for food and fuel. How well could either country stand up to Beijing then? And if they buckle under, there is little chance for the United States to keep together a coalition that can prevent China from dominating Asia."

https://freebeacon.com/columns/china-cuts-the-cord/

(Doug)  And after they dominate Asia (and most of the rest of the world) we would ally with Brussels and Ottawa to counter them?   Has anyone thought this through?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media
« Reply #4377 on: February 02, 2025, 07:56:20 AM »
This would fit in the Geopolitics thread too.