Author Topic: US-Russia  (Read 128905 times)


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Bill Gates's squeeze with Russian honey pot spy
« Reply #304 on: May 27, 2023, 07:12:20 PM »
And here we have the picture of her with the Russian spy (Ana Chapman?)

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/26/16/71452453-0-image-m-154_1685113439486.jpg

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Bill Gates's squeeze with Russian honey pot spy
« Reply #305 on: May 27, 2023, 09:08:35 PM »
And here we have the picture of her with the Russian spy (Ana Chapman?)

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/05/26/16/71452453-0-image-m-154_1685113439486.jpg

Brace yourself for collective indifference from the same leftist hysterics frothing “Russia, Russia, Russia “! Regarding the BadOrangeMan.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Anna Chapman
« Reply #306 on: May 28, 2023, 07:25:15 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
US-Russia: The first six months under President Clinton
« Reply #307 on: June 06, 2023, 01:28:49 AM »


The First Six Months of Clinton-Russian Relations:
Summits with Yeltsin at Vancouver and Tokyo, 1993
Declassified transcripts of US-Russia summits show wide range of cooperation and Clinton’s early personal support: “We’re in this with you for the long haul”
Russian president asks for US aid, housing for demobilized officers, G-7 financing; Americans press for budget austerity, ruble stabilization, and privatization
Clinton rallies to Yeltsin’s side in confrontation with parliament over shock therapy

Washington, D.C., June 5, 2023 – Declassified highest-level records from the first six months of the Clinton administration’s relations with the Russian Federation in 1993 reveal a remarkable array of cooperative diplomatic initiatives and Bill Clinton’s direct personal support for Boris Yeltsin in the latter’s growing conflict with his own elected parliament over radical economic reforms known as “shock therapy.”

The documents include verbatim transcripts of the first two face-to-face presidential meetings, in Vancouver, Canada, in April 1993, and at the G-7 meeting in Tokyo in July 1993, together with records of telephone conversations between the two leaders in February, April and June. The April conversation came just after the Russian leader prevailed in a snap referendum endorsing his leadership and his call for new parliamentary elections. Clinton called to tell the Russian leader, “I want you to know that we’re in this with you for the long haul.”

The documents also include key policy memos prepared for Clinton ahead of the Vancouver summit meeting by national security adviser Tony Lake, Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Secretary of Defense Les Aspin. The latter argued for a “real partnership between our two defense establishments at all levels,” including “intense personal engagement” and even “bonding.” If the U.S. failed, Aspin wrote, the Russian military “will go over to the other side in the ongoing Russian revolution.”

These records are early highlights from the forthcoming document collection: US-Russian Relations from the End of the Soviet Union to the Rise of Vladimir Putin, the latest installment in the award-winning Digital National Security Archive series published by ProQuest.

Together, these documents provide historical context to the statement last week in Helsinki by Secretary of State Antony Blinken in his speech about Russia’s strategic failure in Ukraine: “At the peaceful end of the Cold War, we shared the hope that Russia would emerge to a brighter future, free and open, fully integrated with the world. For more than 30 years, we worked to pursue stable and cooperative relations with Moscow, because we believed that a peaceful, secure, and prosperous Russia is in America’s interests—indeed, in the interests of the world. We still believe that today.”

=====================


https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2023-06-05/first-six-months-clinton-russian-relations-summits-yeltsin?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=75ae4773-a13e-4146-896c-43bf80267fec

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
GPF: US imports of Russian uranium
« Reply #308 on: February 13, 2024, 01:01:43 PM »
WTF?!?   

How much does Hillary's Uranium One shenanigans have to do with this?

==================================================

Russian uranium. The United States purchased a record amount of Russian uranium in 2023, Russia’s RIA Novosti reported. Exports increased by 43 percent to $1.2 billion. U.S. lawmakers passed a bill in December banning imports of low-enriched uranium from Russia.

=======================================
Paywall blocked for me.  Do we already have this here on the forum?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
« Last Edit: February 13, 2024, 01:39:51 PM by Crafty_Dog »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #310 on: February 13, 2024, 02:52:12 PM »
When I click on that I am seeing a page of her hairdos.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #311 on: February 13, 2024, 04:22:16 PM »
The one with the big hairdo was enlarged
Her her looks radioactive.

She monster  :evil:

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
major Russian security risk
« Reply #312 on: February 14, 2024, 11:39:47 AM »
Very odd.
Especially now.
Tail wagging the dog?  Change the topic.

Since when is a security threat so sudden like this?

No I at least will not forget ,  Joe's senility.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rcna138848

We already know about major threats from Russia, CCP Iran, Venezuela etc.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #313 on: February 14, 2024, 12:20:14 PM »
looks like this came out of House Intelligence so not clearly wag the tail.

very strange leak....

market quiet
and now other news instead.....


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3484
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Terrorists alive
« Reply #315 on: March 23, 2024, 09:16:39 AM »
hard to believe Russia has the terrorists alive!


escaping to Ukraine ? now we won't know what the investigation will show or even how truthful it will be.
what does our intelligence know?


ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1719
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #316 on: March 23, 2024, 12:24:43 PM »
UKr will get blamed.. ISIS bombing Russia does not make sense. Russia is a major supporter of the muslim world at the moment. From Hamas to Saudis to Iran.
Obama was visiting London a few days ago..probably carrying a message.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1769821700198105301
« Last Edit: March 23, 2024, 12:28:10 PM by ya »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #317 on: March 23, 2024, 07:12:51 PM »
OTOH there is Chechnya, and supporting Assad in Syria , , , and the history of the Central Asia border lands and the treatment of the 10% of Russian population that is Muslim.

BlueLight

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #318 on: March 24, 2024, 12:37:37 AM »
ISIS-K, probably operating out of Afghanistan or Turkmenistan. Makes sense they were the ones responsible given proximity and activity.

ISIS sleepers in Syria are inactive because YPG/SDF are suppressing them, but they've picked up a bit since operation Olive Branch, when the Turks got their proxies to push into Kurdish territory. They also have African affiliates but ISIS-K is most active right now.

These are the kind of people that don't deserve to exist on this planet, I'd kill them for free, and wouldn't feel guilty about it.

To be honest, I know a lot more about the Syrian IS affiliates, but their ideology is the same everywhere. Some people are way past redemption and need to be put down.

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1719
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #319 on: March 24, 2024, 05:00:03 AM »
Somebody on Twitter.

"One of the questions people are asking is why the IS attacked in Moscow and why now. First, it is not since yesterday. In the case of the Russian Federation, its years of repression in the Caucasus, its intervention in Syria, and its role in Central Asia are among the reasons Russia has been targeted. This news rarely makes the Western web pages, but there are frequent reports in the Russian media of "anti-terrorist" operations by Russian security forces in the Caucasus regions, Chechnya and Ingushetia. Most recently, the FSB conducted 13-hour-long gun battles with armed men in a town in Ingushetia who have no connection to the IS but are anti-government and attacked police posts.

Interestingly, unlike the attack in Moscow, in that case in Ingushetia, Russian authorities announced that they had eliminated IS fighters. Now that the heart of the empire has been struck by IS, things look different. The Kremlin will not admit that security has been compromised, that the group that the Russian army claimed to have destroyed in the ruins of Palmyra is not at the gates of Moscow but has already broken through.

There is hardly a message from the IS as ignored as the one on the Moscow attack. The Russian government has launched a narrative that Ukraine was behind the attack, and the narrative has been building over the past twenty-four hours. Although the organization released footage of the attack itself - very brutal footage showing the brutality of the attack - the Russian Federation is sticking to its Ukrainian thesis and will use it repeatedly. In the meantime, Russia remains exposed to more terrorist attacks due to its inability to deter them."
« Last Edit: March 24, 2024, 05:17:17 AM by ya »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #320 on: March 24, 2024, 05:51:54 AM »
My understanding is that they were Tajiks.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Zeihan: Putin's offensive capability will be gone in a decade
« Reply #321 on: March 24, 2024, 08:50:43 AM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrpzRGWahSk

"Russia is a multi-ethnic empire."
« Last Edit: March 24, 2024, 08:53:07 AM by Crafty_Dog »


ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1719
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #323 on: March 25, 2024, 04:19:31 AM »
For months now, Martin Armstrong has been beating the war drums. May 7 2024 is a critical and long forecasted date, based on his proprietary Socrates arrays. A lot of things are lining up, together with some other currency data. It takes some experience to read these arrays. the rouble is also getting stronger.


« Last Edit: March 25, 2024, 04:23:54 AM by ya »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #324 on: March 25, 2024, 04:25:09 AM »
Flesh that out a bit please.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Kasparov
« Reply #325 on: March 25, 2024, 04:39:15 AM »
Kasparov misses the role of US border security in Republican actions, but his hypothesis intrigues

Moscow Attack: Don’t Believe the Kremlin
In a heavily surveilled city, how could ISIS terrorists have killed for nearly an hour and driven away?
By Garry Kasparov
March 24, 2024 2:41 pm ET


Friday’s terrorist attack at the Crocus City Hall concert venue near Moscow killed more than 100 people in a brutal crime against humanity. Many key facts are still unclear, and rest assured they will become only less clear as the Kremlin works to exploit the crisis domestically and abroad.

Coming shortly after his latest sham election, the attack gave dictator Vladimir Putin a rallying cry one day after the Kremlin declared for the first time that Russia is in a “state of war” in Ukraine.

Paranoia is my birthright, as it is for anyone born in the Soviet Union. But the official Kremlin story line is already a shambles. In one of the most surveilled cities on earth, where you can be arrested in 30 seconds for whispering “no war,” the terrorists continued their attack for more than an hour and then simply drove away.

The FSB, Russia’s state security service, claims to have arrested four suspects near Ukraine, at one of the most fortified borders in the world. Or did the suspects actually drive to Russian ally Belarus, as that nation’s ambassador to Russia said? Considering the amount of materiel and preparation required to do so much damage to a venue the size of a small village, it’s odd that the terrorists would suddenly turn into bungling amateurs by carrying their Tajik passports and heading to a militarized border.

Every official statement from the Kremlin and its propagandists will be a lie, with a few half-truths tossed in. It’s a control reflex of the security state of which Mr. Putin is a product. As I often say, I believe in coincidences, but I also believe in the KGB.

Mr. Putin angrily dismissed warnings from the U.S. Embassy on March 7 and March 18 about a potential terror attack at a concert venue in Moscow. (How did the U.S. know? Was it sources in ISIS-K or, as I suspect, moles in the FSB?) Then, on March 22, Mr. Putin issued orders to conscript hundreds of thousands more Russians for his war of conquest against Ukraine.

Twenty-five years ago, when then-Prime Minister Putin needed a platform for his presidential campaign, a series of terrorist apartment bombings in Russia launched the Second Chechen War. I laid out the copious evidence that these were false-flag attacks, staged by the FSB, in my 2015 book, “Winter Is Coming.” It’s a deed so shocking that it is difficult to believe—until you realize what sort of man Mr. Putin is. He has no allergy to blood, Russian or any other kind, if spilling it furthers his goals.

Twenty-five years ago, Mr. Putin grabbed power by committing mass murder in Chechnya. Today, in hope of staying in power, Mr. Putin is committing mass murder in Ukraine.

The West’s weakness encourages Russian escalation. White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan was just in Kyiv, but instead of helping Ukraine fight off the daily Russian attacks on its energy infrastructure by delivering weapons, he was apparently there to discourage Ukraine from doing the same to Russia. On Friday the Financial Times reported that the U.S. has pressured Ukraine not to attack Russian oil infrastructure for fear of raising global gas prices—which might harm President Biden’s re-election chances. Russian air power devastates Ukraine because America promised Ukraine F-16s but says it takes too long to train the pilots. Last week Mr. Biden’s administration even vetoed a Group of Seven statement condemning Russia’s fake elections.

All this suggests Mr. Biden fears Russian defeat more than Russian victory. As I documented in August, this is the continuation of a betrayal of a democratic ally and of American security interests.

It’s a cowardly new world order. The White House is busy telling Ukraine where it can’t shoot and telling Israel where it can’t hunt terrorists. Instead of providing leadership to unite democratic allies against dictators, Mr. Biden’s administration puts limits on America’s allies to protect America’s enemies. You don’t have to wonder what Taiwan and China make of America’s descent into passivity.

Republican obstruction of aid to Ukraine is despicable, but Mr. Biden can’t use it to excuse his own politicking and inaction. America has the largest military arsenal known to man, but it rusts in warehouses while Ukrainians die. Harry Truman had to face down Stalin and said the buck stopped with him. Mr. Biden says the buck stops with Speaker Mike Johnson. Donald Trump threatens isolationism in speeches and social-media posts; Mr. Biden is making isolationism a reality by refusing to stand up to dictators or to his own domestic opposition.

Mr. Biden retreated from Afghanistan, and Russia invaded Ukraine. He retreated from Ukraine, and Hamas launched a war against Israel. Weakness invites aggression.

Mr. Putin believes he needs perpetual war to hold on to power. He is creating the conditions to radicalize the Russian population further and to fulfill his new mobilization orders. By summer, the new conscripts will be at Ukraine’s front lines. Ukraine can’t survive this year unless America’s leaders do what is right instead of what they think is politically expedient.

Like all dictators, Mr. Putin excels at creating distractions from his crimes. The Moscow attack will draw global attention away from his war on Ukraine, but it won’t distract him at all. Mourn for every innocent life lost in Moscow, but also act to save the next one in Ukraine.

If a suspected serial killer is at large, the first thing to do when there’s a murder is to check his alibi. Mr. Putin is under indictment for war crimes, and his bloody track record makes him suspect No. 1. There can be no common cause against terror with Russia when the world’s most accomplished terrorist rules the Kremlin.

Mr. Kasparov is a co-founder of the World Liberty Congress and chairman of the Renew Democracy Initiative.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2024, 02:20:22 PM by Crafty_Dog »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19787
    • View Profile
Re: Gasparov
« Reply #326 on: March 25, 2024, 07:20:53 AM »
Very interesting.  I had not thought of that.

Is Putin THAT evil?    - yes

One thing is certain .  The shooters didn't risk having armed citizens shooting back.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_Russia#:~:text=Originally%2C%20handguns%20were%20only%20used,be%20concealed%20carry%20in%20public.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19787
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #328 on: April 10, 2024, 05:23:20 AM »
Interesting times of lost opportunity.

In my view, the US leftward turn during Bush's last two years and then in Clinton's first two years blurred the lines of what a new Russia needed to do to compete in the western world. Why would they turn to freedom while we were turning away from it?

To follow Reagan, America chose Bush over Dukakis in 1988 when the right answer in my view  was Jack Kemp to take economic freedom in the west to the next level using what we learned in Reagan's 8 years.

So we had 4 years of undoing Reagan in the US while potential freedom in Russia was in it's infancy. By the end of the decade Russia had KGB for a leader and their chance at free elections, free economy and a free people was squandered.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #329 on: April 10, 2024, 05:28:44 AM »


ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1719
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #331 on: June 19, 2024, 04:00:46 PM »
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. NOK which was under control during Trump now has a protection treaty under Biden. Will also have better weapons.
I guess supplying weapons to Ukr has consequences.

https://x.com/i/status/1803516550785425456
« Last Edit: June 19, 2024, 08:07:51 PM by ya »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
The Nature of Russian Propaganda
« Reply #332 on: June 23, 2024, 03:24:33 AM »


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3484
    • View Profile
Trump’s Ukraine Assessment Incorrect, Hence Counterproductive?
« Reply #334 on: January 23, 2025, 09:10:03 PM »
When I first heard Trump state economic pressure would bring Russia to its knees, thus ending their Ukrainian adventure promptly I thought “crap, not this again.” We’ve been hearing about Russia’s looming collapse due to Western sanctions for several years, but all that’s occurred is the cost of natural gas and oil has increased making Russia, an energy exporter all to glad to work with other regimes sanctioned by the West, richer.

I’ll grant that upping US hydrocarbon production will rain on Putin’s parade to a degree, but very much hope Trump has more up his sleeve then what has been noted below:

​Trump Falters in his Approach to Putin

Seems to endorse a discredited theory on Russia

STEPHEN BRYEN

JAN 23, 2025

President Donald Trump, on Truth Social and in interviews, is pushing the idea that Russia needs to hurry up and make a deal on Ukraine before Trump, taking advantage of Russia's economic problems, imposes high tariffs and other sanctions on Russia. To emphasize his own thinking about the futility of the Ukraine war, Trump says that Russia has suffered over a million casualties and Ukraine 800,000.


The body of a Russian soldier is seen near a destroyed Russian tank in the village of Storozheve in the Donetsk region on June 14. —RFE
Trump's numbers on casualties exceed even Ukraine's wild estimates of Russian losses. The "official" number pushed by Ukraine's Zelensky is Russia has suffered 812,670 casualties to date, while Ukraine has lost 43,000 dead, according to Zelensky. It is widely accepted that the ratio of wounded to dead in the Ukraine war is running 3 to 1, so following Zelensky's number, Ukraine has lost 129,000 in total.

Thanks for reading Weapons and Strategy! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.



Subscribe

Zelensky's Speech at the 2024 Borys Paton National Prize of Ukraine Award Ceremony on Dec. 10, 2024. (Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Official website)
Don’t believe Zelensky’s numbers, as Ukrainian casualties are higher than he says.

Both sides naturally misrepresent information on losses. The Russians do not give any numbers at all, while the Ukrainians vastly exaggerate Russian losses to reassure their own public and their NATO supporters.

The best information on Russian casualties comes from an organization called Mediazona. Mediazona is Russian independent media outlet that the Russian government has tried to shut down. It is fiercely anti-Putin. Mediazona's report on Russian "confirmed killed" between 24 February, 2022 and 18 January, 2025 is 88,726. Using the 3 to 1 ratio, that would bring total Russian casualties to 266,178, or roughly one fourth of what Trump has said.

Trump's view of the Russian economic situation likely follows what he has been told by US intelligence. He appears to think Russia's economy is near collapse which leads him to tell Putin to hurry up and make a deal or suffer the consequences.

The western press has been full of stories all of which have the same thing. Russia's economy is in free fall and in a huge crisis. This "theme" is followed up with reports that Putin is in trouble at home, has been furious with his economic advisors, and is demanding some kind of fix. Anyone running a war that is costly and where the national currency value has fallen precipitously, where interest rates are outlandish and inflation nearly out of control, would naturally be worried and alarmed. But that does not mean either Putin or his ministers are in a panic, and it does not mean that the Russian government is about to collapse.

Most of these articles plastered in Western media reports lack sources. Even where they exist, they are indirect. For example, the pro-Ukraine Daily Mail (not known for any objectivity on the issue of Ukraine) reports that Oleg Vyugin, a former deputy chairman of the Central Bank of Russia says that "Russia, of course, is economically interested in negotiating a diplomatic end to the conflict."

So far the best non-government report coming out of Russia was published in Foreign Affairs by Alexandra Propenenko. She is a fellow of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin. She worked at Russia’s central bank until early 2022. Her argument is that "Putin is not yet desperate" and that economic pain will not turn the tide in Ukraine. She writes: "The problem for the West is timing. Political leaders want the war to end quickly. Some analysts have also suggested that in the coming months, the pressure on Russia could be so great that Putin will have to seek an off-ramp to stabilize the economy and safeguard his hold on power. But Western hopes rest on a false assumption. Russia’s economic challenges are not yet so acute that they will make a meaningful difference in the war in the near term. For at least the next year, the Kremlin should be able to keep its overheating economy from exploding into a full-blown crisis. Putin will likely still have the resources to sustain his brutal campaign in Ukraine—and perhaps the incentive to wait out the West."

Russia right now has a labor shortage and full employment. Typically an economy in trouble is characterized by people out of work, low wages or no wages, and supply shortages especially consumer goods. Russia has consumer goods, although imported ones and some domestic products (butter and eggs for example) are expensive but not in short supply. Sanctions have opened the field to China, and Chinese products are cheaper than western ones, automobiles for example. There is no doubt that the war has contributed to the labor shortage, but it is hard to tell how much. Wages are high and increasing.

Russia also is energy independent and can regulate fuel prices at home, unlike Europe. In fact, because of the sanctions imposed on Russia and the not-so-secret destruction of Russian pipelines (and the artificial decision to not renew transit agreements for pipelines through Ukraine), the European economies are in worse shape than Russia when it comes to employment and energy shortages and costs. Germany already is in a recession but Russia is not. Some think that the European currency, the Euro, is living on borrowed time. Further economic erosion in Germany and France could impact the value of the Euro.

The energy crisis in Europe could become worse if Russia decides to stop supplying gas, oil and LNG, meaning that Putin can damage Europe much more than Trump can damage Russia with new sanctions, tariffs or any other economic measure.

The flood of reports about Russia's economy and Putin's problems are part of a scenario promoted by Biden and his deep state colleagues on the mistaken belief that the US could engineer regime change in Russia. Trump seems to be endorsing that policy. Unfortunately, it is counterproductive as it only strengthens the Russian determination to finish the Ukraine war and win it. Worse still, it harms Trump's credibility with Moscow in getting a deal to end the war. Trump came to office relatively free of any relationship to the Biden deep state policy. He seemed to understand that the policy of trying to upend Moscow and Putin was counterproductive and unintelligent. His approach gave him an advantage, coming into office without any Biden foreign policy baggage, which he is now in danger of losing.

The expected phone call between Trump and Putin has not materialized and the White House and NSC has not made any arrangement with the Russians to start a dialogue. The reason why is obvious.

https://weapons.substack.com/p/trump-falters-in-his-approach-to?r=1qo1e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #335 on: January 25, 2025, 05:41:20 AM »
If I have it right, we have suspended aid to Ukraine.  If this is so, it seems counterproductive to pressuring Russia to say the least!

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Re: US-Russia
« Reply #336 on: January 25, 2025, 06:06:24 AM »
agree  seems contradictory to stop aid to Ukes while trying to use financial threats to make Russia come to the table.   Who could have guessed: Rus - Ukes war not stopped "in a day".



some countries are simply not going to respond to threats with folding and giving in.

look at Mexico's refusal to accept illegals flown in from US.

But we will see.