Author Topic: Keith Ellison; Tom Perez; Farrakhan; Ocasio, Omar, Tlaib, Sharpton, Jeffries  (Read 63404 times)


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
Eleanor Clift
« Reply #251 on: March 02, 2022, 08:20:57 AM »
 :roll:

Talib is a "gift to the GOP"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rashida-tlaib-state-union-response-045645554.html

I would hardly say that someone complaining about Biden not being LEFT enough is a gift to us!

that said Eleanor Clift was never a repository of logic or astute thinking......... :wink:

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
Sorry GM
« Reply #252 on: May 20, 2022, 05:33:42 AM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
buffoonery that never stops AOC
« Reply #255 on: July 04, 2022, 07:55:24 AM »
https://www.conservativereview.com/there-is-no-act-too-small-aoc-does-her-nails-as-act-of-resistance-2657600993.html

I guess I can dedicate my next haircut to fighting loons like AOC
I feel fulfilled just thinking about it........       d :-o



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile
Keith Ellison Tied to the scandal
« Reply #261 on: October 12, 2022, 08:24:36 AM »
I'm sure you saw this all over the MSM this morning (joking):

https://www.americanexperiment.org/digging-into-feeding-our-future-political-donations-the-ellison-connections-of-december-20th/

https://www.kare11.com/video/news/politics/which-politicians-received-donations-from-feeding-our-future-defendants/89-9ceb04ad-ba44-480d-9fb3-384781389ba9

Who knew that among the 49 indicted in the $240 million Feeding our Future scandal, some made maximum political donations to Keith Ellison and his son, my councilman, Jeremiah Ellison, right before the whole thing came down.

On December 20, Jeremiah Ellison registered receiving 15 donations that day at the maximum amount of $600 per donor. Of those 15, five were from persons later indicted in the case.

On that same day, his father reported receiving four donations, each in the maximum amount of $2,500 per donor. Two of Keith’s maximum donors that day also gave the maximum to his son, that same day. A third Keith donor that day had previously participated in two other mass donation events.

Coincidentally, December 20 fell exactly one month before the FBI raids in the case.

It turns out that one of Keith’s December 20 donors is a former employee of an organization named in the indictments. On a different date, Keith received a maximum donation from another indicted figure, not listed above, which he reportedly returned. He has also received donations on other dates from individuals connected to the case, but who have not been charged.

https://sahanjournal.com/news/feeding-our-future-indictments-who-charged-food-fraud-minnesota/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DONATE TO KEITH ELLISON"S REPUBLICAN OPPONENT:  https://secure.winred.com/jim-schultz-for-minnesota-ag/donatetoday
« Last Edit: October 12, 2022, 09:07:20 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
Whoa , , ,

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile
Re: Keith Ellison; Omar
« Reply #263 on: October 12, 2022, 10:41:22 AM »
Whoa , , ,

kare11 is the Twin Cities NBC station.  Omar is named too.

https://www.kare11.com/video/news/politics/which-politicians-received-donations-from-feeding-our-future-defendants/89-9ceb04ad-ba44-480d-9fb3-384781389ba9

Note:. This is not evidence of crimes.  It's a roadmap to where you likely find them.

"Returning the money" doesn't erase this.

More to come.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2022, 10:52:44 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
NRO: Jeffries is an election denier
« Reply #264 on: January 07, 2023, 07:18:33 PM »
House Democrats’ New Leader Doesn’t Believe in Democracy

Incoming Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) holds a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., December 13, 2022. (Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters)
Share
155 Comments
Listen to article
By DAN MCLAUGHLIN
January 3, 2023 4:03 PM
Hakeem Jeffries has a long history of denying the legitimacy of our elections and governing institutions. He’s entirely unfit for the job he’s been given.
Acrucial value in a democratic system of government is the acceptance of defeat under the rules of the system. Elections are held, and the winners are legitimately entitled to exercise the powers of their offices. Losers need not lose with grace or even dignity; they certainly need not treat a single defeat as final when there is always another election to come. But it threatens the survival of the system when people in positions of authority tell the voters that elections are rigged and their outcomes are illegitimate. These are extraordinary charges that demand extraordinary evidence, which is typically not provided. That way lies political violence and the rule of rioters, mobs, and coups.

Prominent Democrats have been campaigning against the legitimacy of our elections since the aftermath of the 2000 election. In the 2016 campaign, Donald Trump attacked the legitimacy of the Republican contests after losing Iowa and Colorado to Ted Cruz, and signaled that he would attack the legitimacy of the general election if he lost it to Hillary Clinton. But only when Trump denied the validity of his 2020 loss, and it led to a riot at the Capitol, did our media and public discourse acknowledge how damaging this sort of thing can be.

I have previously catalogued at great length the many leading Democrats and pundits who have indulged this sort of destructive rhetoric over the years: Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer; Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, John Kerry, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Bruce Ackerman, Josh Marshall, Robert F. Kennedy jr. and Paul Krugman; Clinton again, Carter again, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Jerrold Nadler, Biden again, Stacey Abrams, Krugman again, and a battery of lesser progressive commentators; Schumer again and Elizabeth Warren; Abrams again and Terry McAuliffe and numerous House Democrat committee chairs; McAuliffe again (here and here); John Lewis; Jonathan Chait and Jamie Raskin; and Krugman again (here and here). The Republican National Committee’s opposition researchers have assembled an even more comprehensive list.

These deniers of the legitimacy of elections have made their case in public speeches and writings about past and upcoming elections, and also in legal and political challenges to election outcomes and efforts to strip elected officials of their power to govern. They’ve told pervasive lies about election law, eagerly bankrolled Republican “election deniers” in primary elections, and offered up endless one-weird-trick arguments for getting around the rules of the system.

Today, House Democrats formalized their choice of New York representative Hakeem Jeffries as their leader; indeed, while Republicans divided over Kevin McCarthy’s leadership, Democrats kept up a united front, giving Jeffries more votes to be Speaker of the House on the first ballot than McCarthy received. If you listened to the Democrats’ rhetoric about threats to democracy and “election denial” over the past two years, you might assume that they were chastened enough to select a leader whose highest value is safeguarding democratic outcomes and repairing the public legitimacy of our elections. Certainly, nothing in the corporate media’s coverage of Jeffries would lead one to believe otherwise. Bill Kristol argues that “election denial” should be an absolute disqualifier for a prospective speaker, in a column entitled “Should an Election Denier Be Speaker of the House?”:

The speaker is supposed, at least some of the time, to speak institutionally for the whole House of Representatives, which in turn represents the whole nation. . . . The new speaker—the first post-January 6th speaker—should not be an election denier.

Of course, Kristol qualifies this: “The constitutional officer second in line to the presidency should not be someone who tried to overturn the last election for the presidency” (emphasis added).

In fact, Jeffries is one of the House’s most persistent deniers of the legitimacy of elections when he dislikes their outcomes. I will credit the legwork done by the RNC’s research team, which has collected the leading examples. On Twitter and in House hearings, Jeffries called the 2016 election “illegitimate,” arguing that Russia — not American voters — “artificially” made Trump the president. He contended that Trump should be denied the power to appoint Supreme Court justices “with the legitimacy of Trump’s presidential election in doubt.” He claimed that Republicans had stolen at least one House seat, that Trump was a “Russian asset,” and that Trump and Russia were “trying to steal” the 2020 election.








Moreover, Jeffries has argued that the Supreme Court’s decisions are “illegitimate” because of Republicans’ “stealing two Supreme Court seats” by means of the votes of Republican senators. He has not specified whether he thinks those senators were not legitimately elected.


As Mitch McConnell noted when the Democrats tapped Jeffries:

The newly elected incoming leader of House Democrats is a past election denier who basically said the 2016 election was “illegitimate” and suggested that we had a “fake president.” . . . He’s also mounted reckless attacks on our independent judiciary, and said that justices who he didn’t like have “zero legitimacy.” . . . “Many of the same individuals and institutions on the political left, who spent the years 2017 through 2020 yelling about the importance of norms and institutions, have themselves not hesitated to undermine our institutions when they’re unhappy with a given outcome.”

As Bonchie at RedState notes, Jeffries already appears to be contesting the legitimacy of the Republicans’ newly elected House majority, tweeting yesterday that because Republicans intend to seat George Santos (who won his election), Democrats “must take back the House. Immediately.”


Lo and behold, we have Kristol cheering on not just this Jeffries tweet but the possibility that it signals “some scheme afoot to have a few Republicans join with all the Democrats” to elect a speaker beholden to the party that just lost the election.

TOP STORIES

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
"Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) defended a controversial trip to Pakistan last year on the grounds that she fought for democracy, human rights, and against "Islamophobia."

why would anyone claim they are going to a 96.5% Islamic country to tout "Islamophobia"?


it is as though she just had to slip in the LEFTIST phobia word in there
which is all they every do.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
yes exactly

you go to Pakistan 96.5% Islamic

to preach do not be Western phobic

(or hatred) not the other way around

you don't go there to reinforcement hatred of America as Islamo"phobic "

you go there and explain radical Muslims are terrorizing us.........




DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile
The Hamas wing of the Democratic Party
« Reply #269 on: October 19, 2023, 09:01:30 PM »
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-lawmaker-rashida-tlaib-accuses-biden-admin-of-funding-genocide-in-palestine-101697701708790.html

Rashida Tlaib has accused the Joe Biden administration of funding a "genocide" against Palestinians and put the onus on Israeli military for bombing a hospital in Gaza,
« Last Edit: October 19, 2023, 09:03:59 PM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Re: The Hamas wing of the Democratic Party
« Reply #270 on: October 19, 2023, 09:05:32 PM »
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-lawmaker-rashida-tlaib-accuses-biden-admin-of-funding-genocide-in-palestine-101697701708790.html

Rashida Tlaib has accused the Joe Biden administration of funding a "genocide" against Palestinians and put the onus on Israeli military for bombing a hospital in Gaza,

And Biden is already equivocating no doubt in advance of caving, and maybe is even looking for several billion dollars worth of equipment to leave behind somewhere for Hamas.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2871
    • View Profile
Omar Leaves No Doubt as to Where Her Loyalties Lie
« Reply #273 on: January 28, 2024, 08:17:58 PM »
It astounds me she is so blatant in proclaiming her loyalties. Guess she figures no one was recording or no speaker of the language would dare to translate her proudly un-American speech into English:

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2024/01/28/watch-ilhan-omar-rips-the-mask-off-and-pledges-allegience-to-somalia-in-disturbing-video-n2169348

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
Not a surprise, but now available as a potent piece of evidence for those who are slow to grasp these things.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile
Ilhan Omar (not her real name)
« Reply #275 on: January 29, 2024, 07:04:53 AM »
Not a surprise, but now available as a potent piece of evidence for those who are slow to grasp these things.

(allegiance to Somalia)

As the veneer is peeled back and her true self is revealed, a cheater, diverter of campaign funds, with higher loyalty to a different country, hatred of this country, supporter of terror, hater of Jews, supports destruction of Israel etc...  as all of that is exposed, her vote totals in Minneapolis remain roughly the same - in her seat previously held by Keith Ellison from Nation of Islam, promoted to State Attorney General.  Celebrate diversity!

These are the people, voters of Omar, who regulate my business (landlording) where it's now illegal to rely on applicant credit reports or discriminate against murderers and sex offenders if enough time has elapsed.  https://www2.minneapolismn.gov/business-services/licenses-permits-inspections/rental-licenses/renter-protections/renter-screening/

What could go wrong?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
Fk  :-o

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
Please paste that in the Congress thread as well.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19162
    • View Profile
Rep. Ilhan Omar D-Mpls
« Reply #279 on: April 12, 2024, 11:31:06 AM »
Just want to take a moment to wish Ilhan Omar and her (ex)husband a happy siblings day.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2024, 11:49:50 AM by DougMacG »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 71672
    • View Profile
Ocasio Cortez
« Reply #281 on: August 02, 2024, 02:30:38 PM »
« Last Edit: August 02, 2024, 02:34:07 PM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19433
    • View Profile
suddenly Jewish money is a problem in politics for the LEFT
« Reply #283 on: August 13, 2024, 08:54:36 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/progressives-face-an-existential-threat-from-aipac-and-there-s-nothing-to-stop-it/ar-AA1oIhbT?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=ea66732f0d65471e937dbb5abad45d49&ei=51

didn't seem to be a problem with Zuck bucks.

BTW how do we know AIPAC money is what caused Bush and Bowman to lose?
Maybe it was their ideology.   Maybe it is their racism and bigotry.

And to think Bernie Sanders, born a Jew, sides with these people......

He is so despicable.  He should be deported to Cuba.