Author Topic: California  (Read 361364 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: January 08, 2017, 09:15:17 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #552 on: January 08, 2017, 09:15:44 AM »
I did not know that illegal alien IDs were accepted by the TSA.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #553 on: January 08, 2017, 09:20:44 AM »
http://www.dmv.org/ca-california/ab-60-drivers-license.php

The whole concept of these "driver" ID s is absurd.
Why give people who cannot establish they are in the country legally an ID so they can drive around illegally in the US?

Just sickening.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #554 on: January 08, 2017, 09:22:57 AM »
As I understand it the argument is so that they can buy car insurance.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #555 on: January 08, 2017, 11:44:46 AM »
As I understand it the argument is so that they can buy car insurance.


Yeah, Illegals love them some car insurance!  :roll:


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
California: Pre-Litigation Demand Letter sent to DOJ opposing “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” Regulations
 

As previously reported, the California Department of Justice (DOJ) officially submitted regulations regarding newly classified “Bullet Button Assault Weapons” to the Office of Administrative Law (“OAL”) for final publication in the California Code of Regulations (CCR).  The regulations were submitted to OAL as “File and Print” only, meaning DOJ is claiming that the regulations are expressly exempted by statute from public comment or OAL review.  The regular rulemaking process in California requires State agencies to provide at least 45 days for public comment on any regulation.  But if OAL accepts DOJ’s position that all of their “assault weapon” regulations are exempt from this ordinary adoption process, the regulations will then be published in the CCR without any opportunity for public comment.

DOJ claims an exemption as a result of specific language in the recently enacted “assault weapon” law regarding the registration process. As enacted, the law requires DOJ to create regulations providing gun owners with the information necessary on how to properly register their bullet-button firearms with DOJ as an “assault weapon.” The law exempts such registration related regulations from the typical rulemaking process, but significantly, only to the extent necessary for the actual registration process.

Contrary to the limits of the OAL exemption contained in the statute itself, the regulations submitted by DOJ to OAL go far beyond what is necessary for the registration process. The regulations actually read like a wish list from the gun ban lobby that DOJ is attempting to shoehorn into the limited exception to the regulatory adoption process actually contained in the law. Included in the regulations DOJ submitted are over 40 new definitions, excessive personal information requirements for registering a firearm, requirements that individuals provide information on where they acquired their firearms, requirements that individuals provide DOJ with photos of their firearms, requirements for serializing firearms built from 80% receivers, expansion of the “assault weapon” definition to bullet-button equipped shotguns, and restrictions on removing the “bullet-button” once the firearm is registered as an “assault weapon.”

In response, today NRA and CRPA’s legal team submitted a joint-letter to DOJ demanding that DOJ withdraw their regulations as a violation of the authority granted under the law.  NRA and CRPA’s legal team also submitted a joint-letter to OAL requesting OAL to reject and not officially publish DOJ’s regulations. In the event that DOJ does not adhere to this demand letter, a lawsuit will be promptly filed.

Don’t forget tomorrow, Tuesday January 10 at 12:00 p.m., NRA and CRPA’s legal team will be hosting a free webinar on the recently submitted “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” regulations. You can register for the webinar by clicking here. Submit questions in advance to webinarquestions@michellawyers.com. If you are unable to attend the webinar, it will be archived for later viewing.

Be sure to stay tuned to your inbox and www.nraila.org for updates on this issue and many more effecting your rights. 
 
 
 


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #558 on: January 18, 2017, 09:34:40 AM »
CD,

should marijuana be legal ?

IYHO?

I have mixed thoughts on the matter.  usually after thinking about it I come down concluding it is probably better if not legal but not strongly of that view.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #559 on: January 18, 2017, 11:47:05 AM »
Off the top of my head, if I were drafting the law i would say:

a) no advertising
b) no public consumption
c) over 18 or over 21

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #564 on: January 24, 2017, 04:53:36 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #565 on: January 25, 2017, 05:56:42 AM »
A bombastic site, but it covers things that I cannot find elsewhere:

http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #566 on: January 26, 2017, 11:01:26 PM »
Of no relevance to me because I do not own an AR, but perhaps of interest to some others.  Obviously, due your own diligence:

http://www.krcrtv.com/news/local/shasta/shasta-co-men-create-new-part-to-make-guns-like-an-ar-15-legal/293100142

DDF

  • Guest
Re: 1/3 of California wants Calexit
« Reply #567 on: January 27, 2017, 04:45:11 PM »
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Reuters-poll-says-1-in-3-Californians-calexit-10879933.php

I strongly support them.


I'm just stating for the record, that if at any time California secedes, (and I hope they try it), and finds themselves no longer part of the United States of America and privy to the protection that affords them (as well as the rule of law)... as a native born son of the state, I will be invading them to defend my birthright.

Just making that clear.

Personally, I hope they do. I've been bored lately.

Oh..and I don't want to be president if I win. Someone else can do that.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #568 on: January 27, 2017, 06:16:42 PM »
As opening stated in the Articles of Confederation after the Revolutionary War and carried forward by our Constitution in 1789 (?) with the words "In order to form a more perfect union", and as settled by force of arms in 1865, our Union is permanent and indivisible.  PERIOD.

To the contrary is to surrender to the reconquista.

NO.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2017, 06:19:21 PM by Crafty_Dog »

DDF

  • Guest
Re: California
« Reply #569 on: January 27, 2017, 06:36:28 PM »
Understood. I'm just wondering how long the ties that bind will last.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #570 on: January 28, 2017, 02:09:44 PM »
Likewise, understood.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #571 on: January 29, 2017, 12:25:37 PM »
As opening stated in the Articles of Confederation after the Revolutionary War and carried forward by our Constitution in 1789 (?) with the words "In order to form a more perfect union", and as settled by force of arms in 1865, our Union is permanent and indivisible.  PERIOD.

To the contrary is to surrender to the reconquista.

NO.


After California collapses, we can go in and retake it by force.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #572 on: January 29, 2017, 12:31:39 PM »
"After California collapses, we can go in and retake it by force."

That is what Lincoln would have done.

DDF

  • Guest
Re: California
« Reply #573 on: January 29, 2017, 05:18:46 PM »
I'm sickened when I think of the state I was born in and what has happened to it.

It brings out the very worst in me.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2017, 01:12:18 PM by DDF »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: California asks for Federal Disaster Relief
« Reply #578 on: February 13, 2017, 10:39:02 PM »
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/trump-suddenly-recognized-president-california-liberal-state-begs-help/

California is free to burn or die in a flood. Whatever works. I guess the high speed rail and funding illegal aliens was more important than dam maintenance. Being stupid hurts.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #579 on: February 14, 2017, 07:12:59 AM »
Is the media bashing Brown for this.  It was known for years this dam was at risk.

Why is he not being blamed for this avoidable mess?

If he was a Repub the MSM would be all over him


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #581 on: February 15, 2017, 09:54:28 AM »
2 posts ago I asked why the media is silent with avoiding blaming the Democrat Gov of California for the dam problem

Next day we get this.  If Trump is so great why doesn't he jump in and fix it ?   Suddenly the Leftist media is linking Trump to this mess years in the making:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/if-trump-wants-to-make-america-great-again-he-can-start-by-fixing-the-oroville-dam-032117316.html

The outrageous double standard as always with liberals.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Choices for California's tax dollars
« Reply #582 on: February 16, 2017, 07:18:36 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Shall Issue bill offered
« Reply #583 on: February 17, 2017, 09:15:53 PM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Drought
« Reply #586 on: February 27, 2017, 10:53:41 AM »
The drought is over.  Obviously this turn of events is due to climate change:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-g-california-drought-map-htmlstory.html

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: February 27, 2017, 01:13:45 PM by Crafty_Dog »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #590 on: March 07, 2017, 03:49:51 AM »
According to wikipedia 30 + % of California is Mexican.

Gee , how did that happen.  And why do they mostly vote for Dems?

Repubs start the electoral college with an automatic 50 points in the negative and will no end in sight.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
OMG
« Reply #591 on: March 09, 2017, 06:05:46 PM »
Some  people simply cannot just drift off into the sunset :

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/arnold-schwarzenegger-senate-235905

I admire Arnold over all but his politics are not my cup of tea .  He would not be helpful to conservatism.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #592 on: March 14, 2017, 08:11:33 AM »
To speed up  the shifting political power AWAY from the aging white population Kalifornia is proposing this now.  NO other reason for it:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-californians-could-begin-voting-at-age-1488914709-htmlstory.html

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Seventeen year old voter intiative
« Reply #593 on: March 14, 2017, 08:19:52 AM »
To prove the 17 yo voter initiate is nothing more then another cynical  Democrat party ploy look at the age breakdown of voters in Kalifornia.  Over age 55 republicans win.  between the ages of 18 to 34 it is the other way around.  Especially with all the higher rates of births and younger voters that are foreign born and likely Democrat voters.  WHo are most of them going to vote for .  The party that offers them an opportunity and freedom to work hard and take responsibility for oneself or the party that hands out cash stolen  from the citizens that work hard?

http://www.ppic.org/main/publication_show.asp?i=526
« Last Edit: March 14, 2017, 09:16:05 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Sign this CA petition
« Reply #595 on: March 24, 2017, 11:13:55 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #598 on: April 01, 2017, 07:38:53 AM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
got to pay for those ridiculous boon doggles
« Reply #599 on: April 07, 2017, 06:50:24 AM »
The "great man"  (at spending other people's money)  :roll:  struck again:

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/04/07/jerry-browns-12-cent-gas-tax-passes-legislature-deadline/

Once Christy is out from New Jersey we will be at the mercy of the NJ Democrat mafia machine and we will start seeing tax increases like crazy once again too.
« Last Edit: April 07, 2017, 06:52:39 AM by ccp »