Author Topic: Insurrection (Including J6), the Second American Civil War, and "the Resistance"  (Read 418367 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20482
    • View Profile
a blanket pardon of all J6ers was politically foolish.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
Not yet clear to me that such was actually what was done, but if so, then I agree.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20276
    • View Profile
a blanket pardon of all J6ers was politically foolish.

Agree.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3846
    • View Profile
I understand why some here think the J6 pardons issued en masse were “foolish,” though I suspect that opinion undervalues the basic understanding of fairness those Americans that don’t view all issues through “Progressive” lenses—lenses that only see horribly stacked decks comprised of grossly inconsistent standards applied in a manner that injures anyone that doesn’t unquestionably adopt their views and rewards violent behavior in support of “Progressive” ends as appropriate and indeed required—Americans in flyover country celebrated and embrace. This piece does a good job of exploring those nuances:

The Capitol riot fueled the war on wrongthink. Clemency for Capitol rioters should represent the start of the end of that war.

Author Ben Weingarten profile

BEN WEINGARTEN

In the four years since the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, Democrats have crushed and disenfranchised their political opponents in a bid to achieve total power by waging a whole-of-society war on wrongthink. This war encompassed, among other elements, the lawfare apparatus, the broader weaponized administrative state, and the Censorship-Industrial Complex.

Now, with President Trump’s many corrective actions during week one of his second term, we may be witnessing the beginning of the end of this tyrannical war — the first step toward restoring liberty and justice in this country.

Trump began by issuing an executive order called “Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government.” Under that order, the president declared it U.S. policy to “identify and take appropriate action to correct past misconduct by the Federal Government related to the weaponization of law enforcement and the weaponization of the Intelligence Community.”

The directive tasks the attorney general, alongside department and agency heads, with investigating weaponized acts by civil or criminal enforcement authorities over the last four years and presenting a report to the president “with recommendations for appropriate remedial actions.” The order calls on the director of national intelligence to initiate the same review for weaponized acts of the intelligence community.

The devil will be in the details. But if these reviews result in a comprehensive accounting of the malfeasance that transpired, the punishing of those who abused their powers, and the replacement of personnel and reform of policy to prevent future such corruption, this order alone would constitute a massive “W” for the republic.

But the president was not done there. He also issued an executive order on “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship,” which prohibits federal employees from engaging in, facilitating, or using taxpayer dollars for “any conduct that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen.” Like the weaponization order, it also calls on the attorney general and relevant agency heads to probe censorship activities during the last four years and present recommendations for remedial actions.

Given that the federal government provided much of the direction, coordination, and funding that fueled the censorship regime — which was imposed upon Americans over the past decade and intensified over the last four years — this order represents a potentially crippling blow to its entire foundation. As I detailed at RealClearInvestigations, President Trump has telegraphed that this is likely just the opening salvo in a broader effort to dismantle and destroy the Censorship-Industrial Complex.

The actions to end the war on wrongthink even extend across the globe. President Biden issued an unprecedented Executive Order 14115, under which his administration targeted ally Israel’s citizens and threatened its leaders with sanctions for daring to oppose White House policies that would imperil Israelis’ life, liberty, and property — beginning with rewarding the Palestinians for Oct. 7, 2023, with a state. That order was predicated on a sort of blood libel that Jews living in the biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria were engaging in rampant violence against their Arab neighbors. President Trump revoked the despicable order on his first day.

In addition to setting policies to provide accountability and prevent go-forward malfeasance, the administration has already started righting past wrongs. The Trump Justice Department immediately began dismissing outrageous lawsuits, like the one against whistleblowing doctor Eithan Haim, who had exposed that Texas Children’s Hospital was illegally giving children transgender procedures. Likewise, it ended prosecutions against pro-lifers for alleged FACE Act violations and pardoned the overwhelmingly peaceful protesters persecuted by the Biden Justice Department under that law. The administration announced it would reinstate service members booted from the military for refusing to get the Covid jab, with back pay and benefits.

But perhaps most notable of all was Trump’s decision to dismiss all pending cases against Jan. 6 defendants — with prejudice — and provide blanket pardons and a limited number of commutations to the more than 1,500 J6ers already prosecuted for the riot used to launch the war on wrongthink.

That decision took courage. It would have been more politically correct to do a bifurcated set of pardons based on the nature of alleged offenses. But the administration evidently considered Jan. 6 in its totality in deciding to end the entire lawfare inquisition.

Reports suggest the administration weighed the vigorous and seemingly vengeful J6 prosecutions against the leniency granted to Black Lives Matter and Antifa protesters who assaulted cops, murdered people, and burned down cities during the summer of 2020. It likely considered the grave defects to the cases: D.C. judges heaped collective guilt on the defendants and treated them with hostility, authorities violated their due process rights, and defendants faced perhaps the most anti-MAGA jury pools in America while judges refused to let them change venues.

The administration surely recognized, as the Supreme Court confirmed, that prosecutors twisted and tortured laws like the Enron-driven “obstruction of an official proceeding” charge to hang felonies around the necks of protesters. It understood that some without any prior criminal records were subjected to pretrial detention for months on end, with many subjected to alleged abuse in squalid jail conditions. It also appears to have acknowledged the complexity of judging people’s offenses given the presence of informants who may have entrapped some and the reported provocations, if not brutality, of individual police officers.

In short, the president seemingly surmised that the prosecutions were the fruit of a poisonous tree — and were themselves poisoned. Punishment had already been more than meted out. Law enforcement resources were better allocated toward not treating grandmas wandering the Capitol grounds like jihadists, and the American people had rendered their judgment on Jan. 6, 2021, which justified ending the entire sordid lawfare effort. Outgoing President Biden’s cavalier and corrupt pardons and commutations only made the decision easier.

The Capitol riot fueled the war on wrongthink. Clemency for Capitol rioters, perhaps above all other opening actions, should represent the start of the end of that war.

Ben Weingarten is editor at large for RealClearInvestigations. He is a senior contributor to The Federalist, columnist at Newsweek, and a contributor to the New York Post and Epoch Times, among other publications. Subscribe to his newsletter at weingarten.substack.com, and follow him on Twitter: @bhweingarten.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/29/trumps-j6-pardons-signal-the-end-of-the-war-on-wrongthink/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20482
    • View Profile
Left wing pay backtime
« Reply #2105 on: January 31, 2025, 08:57:37 AM »
we kept hearing every illegal who committed serious crimes all day long ....

now this is payback:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/admitted-capitol-rioter-sentenced-in-wrong-way-crash-that-killed-woman/ar-AA1tzt5x

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3846
    • View Profile
J6: Intentional Misdirection?
« Reply #2106 on: February 01, 2025, 01:09:09 PM »
Piece looks into how Dem inaction set up the ensuing Capitol clashes Jan. 6, speculating this act was intended to distract from the voting irregularities that occurred in the earlier national election:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/01/uh-oh-ted-cruz-targets-nancy-pelosis-rejection-of-security-on-jan-6-at-kash-patel-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=uh-oh-ted-cruz-targets-nancy-pelosis-rejection-of-security-on-jan-6-at-kash-patel-hearing


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
Accelerationist found guilty
« Reply #2108 on: February 05, 2025, 12:50:40 PM »


(10) ACCELERATIONIST FOUND GUILTY OF PLANNING POWER GRID ATTACK: Brandon Russell was found guilty of conspiracy to damage an energy facility yesterday and will be sentenced in June. Russell and a co-conspirator planned to attack several facilities in the Baltimore area to “completely destroy this whole city” in 2023.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20482
    • View Profile
amendment to video in above post
« Reply #2110 on: February 08, 2025, 09:53:47 AM »
https://nypost.com/2025/01/25/us-news/ny-man-pardoned-for-attacking-cops-during-jan-6-capitol-riot-eyes-political-run/

did he not say something to the effect he was "peaceful"

 :roll:

some J6 rioters belonged where they were . 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
Ummm , , , they were temps
« Reply #2111 on: February 25, 2025, 02:08:02 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
Bracken on what the former fed employees might do
« Reply #2112 on: February 25, 2025, 04:38:39 PM »

What will millions of desperate and now unemployed former federal employees do now?
And all the recipients of the downstream patronage grants that will disappear? USAID, etc.

I hear an echo of what happened after the entire Ba'ath Party of Saddam Hussein was fired at the outset of the Iraq war. Many of the jobless Ba'ath party turned into AQ in Iraq and ISIS.

Many of the unemployed but "true believing" Rats may turn to terrorism out of rage and desperation. If it's 1'%, that will be thousands or tens of thousands. Enough for a deep support network as well as kinetic operators. -Matt Bracken

==========================

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/73/41/e9/7341e930f27f9bb0695bc2e8437eb2ea.jpg?width=568

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
FO: The Resistance begins to warm up
« Reply #2115 on: March 17, 2025, 08:09:41 AM »



(9) PROTEST & DIRECT ACTION GROUPS SHOW SIGNS OF WARMING: As the Trump agenda is implemented and warmer conditions spread across the United States, protest and direct action groups appear to be getting more active. The following is a roll-up of events over the next couple months:

Indivisible, a national activist organization, is running a “Musk or Us” protest campaign from 15-23 March.

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), a union of trade unions, announced a week of action that includes boycotts and protests for 17-23 March.

On 20 March, U.S. Postal Service workers are organizing a national protest against possible attempts by the Trump administration to reorganize or even privatize the Postal Service.

A “Hands Off!” day of resistance is being planned for Saturday, 05 April where activists will “march, rally, [and] disrupt” at “state capitals, federal buildings, congressional offices, and city centers.”

Activists have scheduled another “Blackout Boycott” for 18 April. A week-long boycott of Walmart is scheduled for 07-14 April.
“Chicano Power” groups are planning a mid-April convergence in Los Angeles, California. These organizations have organized “community-self defense” groups to scout out federal law enforcement involved in immigration enforcement in the greater Los Angeles area.

Left wing organizers are planning large scale May Day protests coming up on Thursday, 01 May, which could feature direct action.

Why It Matters: Many have assumed that protest groups will warm up alongside the weather, which is a fair assumption. Following lackluster and low-level protests since Inauguration Day, I’m finally seeing some indications that activist and direct action groups are becoming more active. My top concern remains that potential economic and financial instability will be an accelerator of civil unrest. - M.S



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
Thanks for the assist.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74659
    • View Profile
FO: How close is US to a color revolution?
« Reply #2120 on: April 02, 2025, 09:29:35 AM »



This report is from Gray Zone Research, which you receive as an EWN member.



How close is the U.S. to a Color Revolution? Well, that depends on how you define it.

A Color Revolution is a type of irregular warfare that uses predominantly non-violent action to topple an existing government, usually through mass protests, demonstrations, and public displays of mass political defiance.

As opposed to the hard power of an insurgency — a violent, armed attempt by irregular forces to overthrow a government — these “popular” revolutions use soft power — social power — to resist, embarrass, frustrate, and undermine the legitimacy of a government and then force it from power.

It’s more than political warfare, but less than a military coup or armed revolution.

Whereas armed revolutionary violence is used to attack the military capacity of a government, Color Revolution is the coordinated, strategic use of soft power against the three pillars of governance:

It attacks legitimacy by turning the people against the existing government, towards an alternative shadow government or government-in-waiting.
It attacks authority by encouraging the people to openly disobey the government.
It attacks capacity by sapping the money, resources, and manpower required to carry out government functions.
A government with no legitimacy, no authority, and no capacity is no government at all, and is soon replaced.




Why Color Revolutions?

The goal of a Color Revolution is to topple an existing government in the shortest amount of time and with the least amount of human suffering. (From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation)

That precludes armed violence as the primary tactic, considering that an average insurgency lasts roughly 10 years and carries a high death toll and no assurance of success (and severe repercussions for failure).

A Color Revolution once launched, on the other hand, is typically over in weeks to months, and has a comparatively higher success rate to insurgency with a far lower death toll.

So, are we seeing this in the United States — a coordinated, nonviolent effort to force the Trump administration from power and replace them with a shadow government?

Well, yeah, obviously.

But probably not to the extent that many people believe.

Earlier this week, an X account with a large following claimed that we are “in the middle” of a Color Revolution.

I don’t see it that way. (She’s wrong.) We’re not in the middle, but in the beginning stages of one. What I see is that the left still has substantial problems to overcome that they have, so far, shown an inability to solve.

A Color Revolution has three basic prerequisites:

Powerful non-governmental organizations (NGOs) capable of developing a strategic plan, and organizing and directing resistance campaigns.
Popular dissatisfaction that creates a foundation for mass resistance and a revolutionary rupture.
A shadow government or government-in-waiting that’s
capable of resuming government functions once the previous government has been forced from power;
and recognized as the legitimate government once it assumes power.
To what degree are we seeing these conditions today?

✅ Powerful NGOs - NGO funding may be temporarily disrupted, but those funding sources will simply shift from public to private.

❌ Popular dissatisfaction - Trump is slightly underwater on job approval, but what else is new? I actually am concerned about the increased financial and economic uncertainty. I don’t believe a mild recession will threaten the Trump administration’s legitimacy or authority, but there is a risk that coordinated left wing economic warfare (boycotts, strikes, sabotage, etc.) makes conditions worse.

❌ A shadow government that’s recognized as the legitimate government once it assumes power. For all his haters, President Trump’s legitimacy is unassailable, which puts him in a far better place than during his first term.




I acknowledge that protest activity is rising. Last weekend, we saw something like 300-400 protests nationwide. This weekend, we’ll see probably a thousand or more. But most of these protests have turnouts in the single to mid-double digits (< 50 people or smaller).

Further, the social temperature is far lower today than it was this time in 2020. Five years ago (prior to Floyd’s Rebellion), the social temperature was extremely high. Protests were frequent. Civil unrest was commonplace and widespread. Antifa black bloc demonstrations happened every single weekend. Right wing and left wing groups fought in the streets. A powder keg.

Today’s environment is much cooler. Protests have so far been underwhelming. Antifa is nowhere to be found. Arsonists and vandals are being arrested and charged, not released. The January 2025 Inauguration Day protests were about one-third the size of January 2017. We are just nowhere close to 2017 levels of accelerators of conflict, much less 2020 levels.

And the 2020 Summer of Love was five-plus years in the making, with its origins going back to 2014-2015. George Floyd was the trigger point, but the American people were subjected to years of propaganda and agitation, COVID-induced lockdowns, a recession, and stimulus. (When or if we repeat these conditions, batten down the hatches! But it hasn’t happened yet.)

These left wing networks are atrophied and will take years to rebuild. What I see as the largest hurdle is pushing activists and militants back into the streets. Last year’s RICO charges in Georgia had a substantial chilling effect on Far Left direct action. These Antifa groups aren’t the same, and I think casual observers of Far Left violence overestimate the willingness of black bloc militants to face the consequences and repercussions of burning down buildings in 2025, as opposed to what they were allowed to do in 2020. Until I start seeing politicians defending so-called antifascist violence against Trump supporters or the federal government, we’re just not going to have a repeat of anything on the order of 2020.

In closing, social, political, and economic conditions are just too cold to jump start a Color Revolution. There are several factors which could accelerate domestic conditions and turn up the temperature. But on a scale of 1-10, we’re probably at a 2 or a 3. You don’t have a Color Revolution without high social temperature and mass protests. There is no revolutionary rupture with the low turnout like we’re seeing. Which means there’s a lot more to come. - M.S.