Author Topic: Money/inflation, the Fed, Banking, Monetary Policy, Dollar, BTC, crypto, Gold  (Read 855227 times)

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
Patience



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
Gratitude.

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
This is the macroeconomic playbook for BTC. Give it a few more weeks to play out.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
WSJ: Dollar and Bond markets ominous message for Trump
« Reply #3403 on: April 10, 2025, 06:48:56 AM »


The Dollar and the Bond Market’s Ominous Message for Trump
In the turmoil touched off by a trade war, the U.S. is no longer seen as safe
Greg Ip
April 10, 2025 5:00 am ET

The stock-market meltdown that accompanied President Trump’s intensifying trade war in recent weeks was unsettling enough. The fall in the dollar and rise in bond yields that went with it have been truly ominous. So ominous, it might be why Trump changed course, at least temporarily, by pausing some of his tariffs Wednesday.

Normally when investors are this scared they seek safety, and nothing is safer than the dollar and Treasury debt. 

But despite mounting fear of recession, the usual flight to safety hasn’t materialized. That is for several reasons, some relatively superficial, such as inflation risks, and one more fundamental.

In recent years, the U.S. has boasted faster growth, bigger advances in technology, and more-ample supplies of cheap energy than almost any other major economy. Investors worldwide flocked to “American exceptionalism” by buying its assets.

The U.S. is still exceptional, but it is also less predictable, more antagonistic, and more isolated. For foreign investors, that makes it less safe. 

The S&P 500 peaked Feb. 19 and then began slipping as Trump rolled out tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, aluminum and steel, and autos. The selloff gathered force after he slapped “reciprocal” tariffs on almost every country on April 2, and China retaliated. In all the S&P 500 fell 19% through midday Wednesday, just before Trump announced a 90-day pause on the recent “reciprocal” tariffs, except on China. In that time, The Wall Street Journal’s Dollar Index dropped 4.5%.

President Trump signing an executive order at the White House.
President Trump signing an executive order last week adding tariffs to nearly all imported goods. Photo: Abe McNatt/White House/ZUMA Press
Since Feb. 19, Treasury yields are down a bit, but since April 2, they are up about a quarter-percentage point. They rose sharply Tuesday night and Wednesday morning before Trump announced his pause. “People were getting a little queasy,” he admitted.

This behavior is unusual. In the seven prior episodes when the S&P 500 fell as much or more, the dollar rose. In the last episode, from January to June 2022, bond yields did rise, because the Federal Reserve was raising short-term interest rates sharply to combat inflation.

Inflation might be part of the explanation now. Tariffs will hurt demand and economic growth, which would normally prompt the Fed to lower interest rates. But tariffs will also raise inflation, at least temporarily, which makes it harder to justify rate cuts.

Nonetheless, with recession risks rising sharply, traders are now betting the Fed will cut rates this year. So the Fed isn’t the main reason bond yields are up.

Technical factors might be playing a role. Hedge funds might have been forced to liquidate bondholdings after their positions went against them, and dealers have done less to smooth out volatility.

Nonetheless, technical factors can’t explain why bonds and the dollar began behaving strangely weeks ago. The more fundamental explanation is that global investors might be changing how they view the U.S.

Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, after a television interview at the White House.
Steve Miran of the Council of Economic Advisers has said tariffs are a way for countries to share U.S. burdens of providing a defense umbrella and a reserve currency. Photo: Ben Curtis/AP
The dollar has long been the world’s reserve currency. Investors and central banks use dollars to defend their own currencies, pay for imports, repay debt, and for emergencies. Businesses of all nationalities transact across borders in dollars. All that creates an enormous need to hold dollars, which are typically invested in Treasurys.

The dollar’s reserve status makes it artificially strong, which results in exports being more expensive and imports cheaper, contributing to the U.S. trade deficit. In a speech this week Steve Miran, chairman of Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers, said other countries should share the U.S.’s burden of providing its defense umbrella and a reserve currency. One way, he said, was by paying tariffs.

Before joining the administration, Miran had, in a report, suggested other countries could help hold down the dollar through a “Mar-a-Lago” accord, and if they didn’t, the U.S. could impose a fee on their holdings of Treasurys. In an email Wednesday, Miran said that he wasn’t advocating either idea then, and that the administration isn’t considering either now. “The United States’ status as the provider of reserve assets is one of our greatest economic strengths and the President has been extremely clear that he will act forcefully to preserve it and vigorously oppose attempts to undermine it,” he said.

Price of 10-year inflation-​protected Treasurys*
Gold (adjusted for​inflation)
2014
'15
'20
'25
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Still, investors might be reluctant to rule out such possibilities given how aggressively Trump has stretched existing laws to hit everyone with steep tariffs.

Jason Thomas, head of global research at Carlyle Group, noted that since early 2022, gold has strongly outperformed inflation-protected Treasurys, suggesting that gold is now the world’s preferred safe-haven asset.

Thomas said that after Russia invaded Ukraine, the U.S. and its allies froze the Russian central bank’s foreign-exchange reserves. In recent months, Trump’s policies suggest the U.S. will play a less central role in global trade, making the dollar less important for invoicing exports and imports, he added. As a result, Thomas said, “The global community and central bank reserve managers are just a bit more hesitant when it comes to adding to Treasury exposure.”

For Trump, this has one indirect benefit: It ensures a stronger dollar doesn’t cancel out the effect of his tariffs on trade.

But it carries a cost: Less demand for dollar assets makes it harder to finance the U.S.’s massive borrowing.

Now, if the trade deficit falls, the U.S. won’t have to sell as many assets to foreigners to finance that deficit.

And yet it would still be at the mercy of such investors. As of last June, foreigners held $7 trillion of Treasury bonds (half by official investors such as central banks). That is about a third of the total held by the public. The federal budget deficit is running at around $2 trillion a year, or 7% of gross domestic product, and Senate Republicans just passed a budget resolution that would continue outsize deficits for the foreseeable future.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
What is your outlook on the health of the dollar? Join the conversation below.

So the U.S. needs foreigners to keep rolling over the bonds they hold, and buying new ones. Even a small pullback would cause yields to jump. Jay Barry, head of global rates strategy at JPMorgan Chase, estimates that yields rise a third of percentage point for each $300 billion decline in foreign official holdings of Treasurys.

There were recent fears that China might try to retaliate against Trump’s tariffs by selling some of its own bondholdings. There is no evidence that it has, but the possibility has highlighted the risks to the U.S. of a trade war morphing into financial war.

In 2022, the U.K.’s new prime minister, Liz Truss, proposed a steep tax cut. British bond yields immediately skyrocketed, the tax cut was withdrawn, and Truss resigned. The dollar’s reserve status was long assumed to insulate the U.S. from such a fate. Events of the past few weeks suggest Trump shouldn’t take that for granted.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
Inflation easing?
« Reply #3404 on: April 10, 2025, 08:39:43 AM »
Consumer-price index fell 0.1% in March, the Labor Department said Thursday

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/inflation-cooled-in-march-cpi-up-2-4-on-year/ar-AA1CFHGm

I'd like to see some interest rate easing on mortgages and federal debt.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2025, 09:45:23 AM by DougMacG »

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
There are several versions of this chart floating around, the main difference is how much is the M2 money supply line moved ahead in days to align with BTC. In anycase, BTC should now start to move with the money supply, latest by May 1. The $ is also falling, which is a tail wind to BTC.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
Digital Yuan to bypass SWIFT
« Reply #3406 on: April 11, 2025, 06:11:58 AM »
HT BBG:

======================

I’m not versed well enough in international banking/trade to assess this piece, but given all the hullabaloo over Trump’s China tariffs, this sees like a gaping back door, a door this piece claims covers 38% of world trade:

https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2025/04/08/china-launched-digital-yuan-payment-system-swift-bypass-1-2-trillion/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
BTC
« Reply #3407 on: April 11, 2025, 06:16:08 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
Trump signs crypto bill
« Reply #3409 on: April 11, 2025, 08:59:23 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
FO
« Reply #3410 on: April 11, 2025, 09:03:54 AM »
fifth

Economically and financially, there’s a confidence crisis brewing, and the risk of a financial crisis is high. This is not just over trade and tariffs, but also over interest rates and Treasury yields, the dollar index, and the tug-of-war between Treasury and the Federal Reserve. The U.S. Treasury has to refinance $6.5 trillion of debt in the first half of this year, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wants to do that at lower rates. They need interest rates and Treasury yields to go down, but the Fed has been unwilling to cut rates because they want to make sure inflation continues trending down and also because the labor market is holding up. In short, the Fed to this point hasn’t believed they needed to cut rates, despite the lobbying from the Trump administration. I’ve also noticed that several major banks have gone from forecasting zero rate cuts this year to now expecting two or three. This is significant. Last week, Deutsche Bank warned, “Beware a dollar confidence crisis.” De-dollarization appears to be happening at some level as foreign investors question whether the dollar and Treasuries are still safehaven assets. Gold continues to rocket higher on these dollar and Treasury fears. Gold is up about 23% so far this year while the dollar is down 8%, and some investment banks are now forecasting a mild recession starting this year. Meanwhile, there’s a looming debt ceiling breach as soon as next month, and some Democrats have lamented that party leadership caved on last month’s continuing resolution bill and they appear willing to take the fight over the cliff this time because they believe it will irreparably damage the Trump administration and GOP heading into the 2026 midterms. Between mass protests (economic issues will drive civil unrest) and potentially a financial crisis and recession, this summer could be bumpy.

=============

Marc: Gold is hitting $3250 (!) while BTC languishes 30% off its highs.  Isn't a key piece of the BTC hypothesis that threats to the dollar would drive people to BTC?

Then there is this:

25% of BTC is underwater:
https://decrypt-dispatch.beehiiv.com/p/bitcoin-investors-underwater
« Last Edit: April 11, 2025, 09:47:58 AM by Crafty_Dog »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
https://citizenwatchreport.com/the-federal-reserve-under-jerome-powell-has-become-a-case-study-in-contradiction/

(Doug) Hard to make sense of what they have done over almost any of their history. A dollar has lost 98 cents of its value since the Fed was created. How long until it loses the rest?

Conservatives criticize powell. Conservatives chose powell. I suggested on these pages that Trump choose Stanford Professor John Taylor as Fed chair, author of the Taylor rule. Instead we have Fed governance by whim, and sometimes by political bias. I'm not the only one here who advocated getting rid of the Dual Mandate the Fed, and putting their sole focus on the dollar, not the economy.  https://www.stlouisfed.org/in-plain-english/the-fed-and-the-dual-mandate-

Powell thinks it's inappropriate to criticize the branches of government that created the Fed for deficits of 2 trillion per year. It's not like spending 40% more than we take in and having to borrow the rest affects his ability to do his job. Or does it??

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
Repeal Humphrey Hawkins Now, Dual Mandate of The Fed
« Reply #3412 on: April 15, 2025, 07:25:30 AM »
While we're at it, repeal Humphrey hawkins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humphrey%E2%80%93Hawkins_Full_Employment_Act

(Doug) This landmark economic legislation was authored by a pharmacist and a realtor, passed by the Democratic house and Democratic Senate and signed by a peanut farmer. No offense, it's great that people like that can rise in a country like this but make no mistake, they were not economic geniuses. Their knowledge base then covers nothing of the monetary intricacies of today. 1977 was perhaps a peak year of economic illiteracy. This bill celebrated the new democratic trifecta in washington. The outgoing Republican president thought he could bring down inflation with his slogan, whip inflation now.

Inflation was 6.8% in 1977, doubled in 3 years to 13.5% in 1980.

The best economists in the country were out of power at that time and largely unknown.

Why don't we celebrate the Republican Trifecta by repealing this well intended economic nonsense.

Read just the long title of the bill and ask whether that is what happened under the law.

"An Act to translate into practical reality the right of all Americans who are able, willing, and seeking to work to full opportunity for useful paid employment at fair rates of compensation; to assert the responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practicable programs and policies to promote full employment, production, and real income, balanced growth, adequate productivity growth, proper attention to national priorities, and reasonable price stability; to require the President each year to set forth explicit short-term and medium-term economic goals; to achieve a better integration of general and structural economic policies; and to improve the coordination of economic policymaking within the Federal Government."

$1 from 1977 has lost 81% of it value.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2025, 07:39:18 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
"While we're at it, repeal Humphrey hawkins."

YES!

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
Fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell?
« Reply #3414 on: April 18, 2025, 06:22:21 AM »
Fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell?

The short answer is, never should have hired him. I wrote on these pages that Trump 1.0 should have picked Professor John B Taylor from Stanford, author of the Taylor rule. Maybe he wasn't available.

WSJ has the story, paywall blocked.
https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/trump-jerome-powell-fed-chair-conflict-e1910cf0

Unleash Prosperity has the other side of it.
https://committeetounleashprosperity.com/hotlines/fire-jerome-powell/

"Anyone remember when the Federal Reserve Board was supposed to be politically independent? Well, never mind.

Powell’s rant yesterday against Trump and tariffs warning of “higher inflation and lower growth” sent the Dow tumbling by more than 500 points. This was arguably the most partisan tantrum by a Fed chair in modern times – attacking a new president’s policies so aggressively and adding to market turmoil when the Fed’s job is to calm markets. Instead he screamed “Fire” in a crowded movie theater.

We are not fans of many of Trump’s tariff strategies. But the idea that inflation is raging out of control is counterfactual.  So far commodity prices are LOWER than they were when Trump entered office and the latest inflation report showed consumer prices coming down.

(Graphic at the link.)

Does anyone recall these apocalyptic predictions when Biden was adding $5 trillion to the debt and inflation skyrocketed to 9.1%? We don’t.

Trump now has good reason to fire Powell for cause – immediately.
"
« Last Edit: April 18, 2025, 06:26:22 AM by DougMacG »



ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
TechDEv presents many supporting data in his newsletter, but here's a key figure. He now thinks the 2025 local top will be in Aug. The Aug timeframe is also seen in Socrates arrays for BTC as a major turning point (though I cant seem to figure out whether its a top or bottom). Based on Techdev's work it should be a top.



ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
    • View Profile
BTC is flipping the 50 day moving avg as support. Seems like its time to go up, or very soon now.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74585
    • View Profile
Good to hear from you  8-)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
Can you fire for cause a baseball batter who is hitting .027?

If this chart comes through (oops it didn't come through), green bars show where Jay Powell hit his inflation target within plus or minus 10%.

(He 'struck out' 71 times in 73 at bats, months running the Fed)



https://x.com/kerpen/status/1914050664512311509

https://committeetounleashprosperity.com/hotlines/jay-powell-is-batting-027/
« Last Edit: April 21, 2025, 07:37:31 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20453
    • View Profile
Trump keeps bashing Powell
« Reply #3421 on: April 21, 2025, 11:53:29 AM »
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/21/trump-powell-attacks-interest-rates-fed.html

any thoughts on this.
I rather like the concept the Fed is independent from the President.

We do not really want politics to play into decision making at the Fed.

I am not a fan of Powell.
Would this be a good time to cut rates . I would not think so. 

Sure it might give the market a boost and Trump could beat his chest but is it the right thing to do?

Any thoughts?

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20258
    • View Profile
Re: Trump keeps bashing Powell
« Reply #3422 on: April 21, 2025, 07:58:40 PM »
"I rather like the concept the Fed is independent from the President."
   - Yes

"We do not really want politics to play into decision making at the Fed."

  - it's okay that he exercises freedom of speech. Powell is perfectly capable of standing up to that kind of pressure.

"I am not a fan of Powell."

  - Me neither.

"Would this be a good time to cut rates . I would not think so."

  - We don't know. Neither does Powell.

   Seems to me the Fed does not control the interest rates that matter most. Mortgage rates (are based on the 10-year Treasury) and the interest on the national debt (same, based on auction, supply and demand).

The Fed kept interest rates way too low for way too long, now I think they're too high - but it's not the biggest problem or two we face.

The irony is Trump (1.0) chose Powell. He chose an insider, not a disruptor. He didn't read the forum, yet.  )

« Last Edit: April 21, 2025, 08:01:45 PM by DougMacG »


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20453
    • View Profile
maybe DJT does read the forum
« Reply #3424 on: April 23, 2025, 04:01:47 PM »
from  my post of 04/21

"any thoughts on this.
I rather like the concept the Fed is independent from the President.

We do not really want politics to play into decision making at the Fed."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/top-trump-aides-urged-president-143417000.html