Author Topic: Immigration issues  (Read 615289 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
AOC brings business to her district
« Reply #2150 on: March 17, 2024, 10:28:43 AM »
so Amazon backed out of building in her district

it is doing just fine attracting new business anyway:

https://pjmedia.com/rick-moran/2024/03/17/look-whose-district-has-become-a-third-world-brothel-and-bazaar-n4927389

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
    • View Profile
Denmark: Relative Violent Crime Rates by Nation
« Reply #2151 on: March 22, 2024, 04:40:26 AM »
« Last Edit: March 22, 2024, 06:12:00 AM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
we should all celebrate the headline
« Reply #2152 on: March 23, 2024, 03:30:07 AM »
Chinese American Joyce Chang head of global research for JP Morgan tells us immigration is good for the country!

rah rah rah hurray!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/jpmorgan-s-head-of-research-says-immigration-is-undeniably-a-good-thing-for-the-economy-as-the-bank-forecasts-even-higher-us-gdp-growth-this-year/ar-BB1kmZEu?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=cd465f6999994ccfa86b23624ec08a3b&ei=12

what about "illegal" do you not understand.
what about 10s of millions rushing the border uncontrolled do you not understand in your Wall Street elite
wealth - sell us out Wall Street schmuck .

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
TX Border Post Overrun
« Reply #2153 on: March 23, 2024, 03:21:38 PM »
TX National Guard overrun by illegals. If this is a trend, it won’t end well. Worse yet, that’s fine by those favoring an open southern border who will use violence occurring in the wake of a human wave to argue TX needs to stand down:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/03/biden-border-crisis-illegal-immigrants-overrun-texas-national-guard/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=biden-border-crisis-illegal-immigrants-overrun-texas-national-guard

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
What’s Wrong w/ this Pic?
« Reply #2154 on: March 23, 2024, 05:47:39 PM »
Folks seeking to immigrate legally via F1 (student) visas denied at record rate. So Hapless Joe in encouraging the low skilled destitute to hop the southern border illegally, while his admin denies students that, on average, pay $30,000/year to study here, often learning highly sought after skills that would benefit the US if these skills were used here are denied entry. Talk about government getting it 180 degrees backwards….

A Record Quarter of a Million International Students Denied Visas, 36 Percent of Applicants
Cato @ Liberty / by David J. Bier / Mar 19, 2024 at 2:25 PM
David J. Bier

This updates an earlier post.

Student visas are the primary jumping‐​off point for most high‐​skilled immigrants to the United States. Immigrants study at America’s elite universities and then find jobs here when they graduate—largely through the post‐​graduate employment authorization program called Optional Practical Training. Despite the importance of these visas, the State Department rejected an unprecedented 36 percent of student visa applicants in 2023, surpassing 2022’s record.

Student visas are known as F‑1 visas. Figure 1 shows the F‑1 student visa denial rate compared to the visa denial rate for all other nonimmigrant (i.e. temporary) visa applicants. As it shows, student visas usually had a similar rejection rate to other nonimmigrant visa applicants. But from 2021 and 2023, student visas were denied at nearly twice the rate of all other applicants. The student visa denial rate increased from a low of 15 percent in 2014 to 36 percent in 2023.

In 2023, consular officers denied a record 253,355 student visas. As Figure 2 shows, more visas were denied in 2023 than were issued in 2002 and 2005. The staggering number of denials occurred even as the number of issuances remained far below the peak year of 2015. Even 2015, with far more applicants, had far fewer denials than in 2023. It now appears that the higher denial rates, which shot up in 2016, may have dissuaded some applicants from applying, and the absolute number of total student visa applicants has declined, and student visa issuances have declined 31 percent from 2015 to 2023.

It is important to understand that before a student can even apply for an F‑1 visa they must already be accepted into a government‐​approved university. This means that the US Department of State turned down 253,355 students who would have likely paid roughly $30,000 per year or $7.6 billion per year in tuition and living expenses. Over four years that number rises to $30.4 billion in lost economic benefits to the United States.

The State Department does not separately delineate the reasons for student visa denials but nearly all nonimmigrant visa denials are for failing to prove “nonimmigrant intent” (that is, the desire not to move to the United States permanently). Applicants need to show sufficient ties to their home country that would impel them to return to their home country when their reasons for visiting have ended.

The nonimmigrant intent subjective standard can be enforced in a variety of ways. Consular officers are supposed to only consider someone’s “present intent” not considering how their intention might change if opportunities arise in the United States to stay legally. In practice, there is very little consistency in application.

The unprecedented denials occurred even though the State Department officials in Washington, DC attempted to return to a lower standard of evidence for students that existed before Trump. The Foreign Affairs Manual now states that students “should be looked at differently” because “typically, students lack the strong economic and social ties of more established visa applicants, and they plan longer stays in the United States.” It concludes that “the natural circumstances of being a student do not disqualify the applicant.” This change occurred in September 2021 before the start of fiscal year 2022.

The State Department hasn’t disclosed the denial rate by nationality in 2022 or 2023, but the rise and fall of Chinese students is the most important trend in student visa policy in recent years (Figure 3). Another ground for denial—which is far less frequent but affects mainly students from China—is Presidential Proclamation 10043, a Trump proclamation that bars visas for people who studied at any university that now works with the Chinese military in any capacity.

This order—which is retroactively applied to students who studied at such universities before the order was issued—was the basis for about 2,000 visa denials in 2021 and probably about 1,600 in 2022, though the exact figure is not published. The number for 2023 is not available yet, but while that is a lot of denials in absolute terms, and it certainly deters many more applicants, it would only explain 1 percent of total student visa denials in 2023.

What may explain the sudden increase in denials is the sudden increase in issuances for Indian students. After major delays during the pandemic, Indian consulates issued an unprecedented 130,839 student visas, by far the highest total for India ever. But according to data obtained by researchers via Freedom of Information Act requests, before the pandemic, US consulates in India were far more likely to deny students than US consulates in China. Indians accounted for a record 29 percent of all visa issuances in 2023, so their higher rate of denial could have affected the worldwide average more.

This theory is plausible, but the only country‐​by‐​country visa denial data that the State Department is releasing are for B visas for tourist and business travelers. For tourist visas, the two countries switched places with Chinese applicants now much more likely to be denied than Indian applicants (Figure 5). Whether this also happened with student visas isn’t known, and the fact that student refusal visa rates stopped closely tracking other nonimmigrant refusal rates complicates the issue. But it could imply that the problem isn’t specific to India and perhaps the increase in denials is coming more from China or elsewhere.

The bigger issue here is how Consular Affairs handles visa interviews. The head of the Consular Affairs division in India is Don Heflin. Heflin explained how student visa interviews work in April 2022:

Bring [bank statements] just in case the vice consul asks, but we are looking at this less than we used to. We know Indian families usually find a way [to pay].… Mostly it’s about explaining why this school and this curriculum makes sense to you. It’s what in American English we call the Elevator Pitch. You’ll have a minute and a half to tell us why this [school] makes sense to you. Don’t walk up and recite something from memory about the campus, the student body, and how old the school is.… Listen, I have a lot of Indian friends. I know that your father may have told you where you were going to go to school and what you were going to study. That’s fine. Tell us what he told you. Show us that it makes sense for you.

None of this information has anything to do with the legal requirements for a student visa. This absurd method of adjudicating student visas explains why India has a much higher than average student visa refusal rate even though Indian students are extremely successful in the United States. The United States should not pass on tens of billions of dollars in economic activity from these students just because they memorized their “elevator pitch” on why they want to study computer science in Kansas. It’s totally irrelevant. The administration needs to increase transparency about student visa denials and adopt a fair and uniform policy for reviews.

https://www.cato.org/blog/record-quarter-million-international-students-denied-visas-36-applicants

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
daily propaganda on how the illegals are good for us
« Reply #2155 on: March 24, 2024, 11:14:41 AM »
seems like every day there is at least one headline telling us we should love immigrants (illegals)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/u-s-economy-saved-by-immigrants/ar-BB1krsXz?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=b702a3cee296455a940d62c284dde6a9&ei=7

always from Wall Streeters or liberal sources
recently one by Paul Krugman  :roll:

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69403
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #2157 on: March 27, 2024, 07:46:35 AM »
on the illegal to do list

get pregnant then stop at the OB clinic then 9 mo to the hospital

anchors away

 :x

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Lationos "rebuilt" Baltimore
« Reply #2158 on: March 30, 2024, 06:38:50 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/latino-communities-rebuilt-baltimore-now-they-re-grieving-bridge-collapse-victims/ar-BB1kN0Rz?ocid=msedgntphdr&cvid=e3eb4e778b064cb8b5fa83eec74fb465&ei=23

no one is against Central and S Americans who come here to build a life.
but my continues question -> what is it about *illegal* you don't understand?

OTOH I don't know those who perished in the bridge collapse were not legal but of course that is not mentioned while at the same LEFT wing USA today tries to use it to further Democrat Party agenda
nonetheless without that knowledge.

So I am responding in kind.


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Next Up? Double Secret Probation....
« Reply #2160 on: April 04, 2024, 11:22:00 AM »
Repeatedly busted illegals arrested for ... well it ought to be chutzpah but read this and weep:

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2024/04/04/rap-sheets-like-these-and-we-still-cant-deport-them-n4927885

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Who has Economic Growth Favored?
« Reply #2161 on: April 06, 2024, 03:45:35 PM »
Native-born Americans left behind as economy recovered from Covid. Immigrants, on the other hand, improved:

https://x.com/kausmickey/status/1776710930950447157

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
800,000 work permit extensions
« Reply #2162 on: April 07, 2024, 02:37:52 AM »
« Last Edit: April 07, 2024, 05:14:08 AM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Sen. John Thune on Myorkas trial
« Reply #2163 on: April 10, 2024, 05:07:40 AM »
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/john-thune-alejandro-mayorkas-impeachment/2024/04/09/id/1160383/

of course, 67 votes needed to rid us of this lying treasonous criminal, but a trial would at least further expose him.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18255
    • View Profile
Re: Sen. John Thune on Myorkas trial
« Reply #2164 on: April 10, 2024, 05:45:50 AM »
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/john-thune-alejandro-mayorkas-impeachment/2024/04/09/id/1160383/

of course, 67 votes needed to rid us of this lying treasonous criminal, but a trial would at least further expose him.

Right.  A trial would expose him, not remove him.

The article gives the example of how to avoid the trial. Biden could replace Mayorkas since it is the individual, not the administration being impeached. That seems to be the only way out other than schedule the trial for after the election.

Otherwise, aren't they constitutionally mandated to have a trial?  Wouldn't it take 60 votes to outright dismiss the charges? 

Schumer's last act as Majority Leader: whatever they choose, Senate Democrats are feeding a movement destined to put them in the minority. 

Thune wants to be Majority Leader and seems to be saying the right things in this case.

Let's see which affects swing state voters more, Trump's business valuations trial or exposure of the administration's collusion with the Mexican cartels to bring 10 million illegals into our country, including fentanyl that killed more than the Vietnam war,  human trafficking that's now greater than the drug trade, violent crime to our cities and suburbs, and terror and espionage cells.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2024, 06:02:21 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69403
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Denver funding illegals over police and fire departments
« Reply #2166 on: April 13, 2024, 08:53:54 AM »
I noticed all 5 politicians from the mayor up to the governor are crats.
The crats all on board with wiping out the Rs by flooding the future electorate with new voters and bribing them with tax payer money.

 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69403
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69403
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #2170 on: April 22, 2024, 10:04:13 AM »
I don't need to hear that "we are a nation of immigrants"
that "my ancestors came" here on and on.....

First they came here legally
Second most were proud to be here
    (A few brought their European socialism with them but they were drowned out.)
    (The socialist party was always minority not a major party like the Democrats now)
Third they received no free tax payer funded benefits from existing citizens

"Our diversity is our strength ".   
Well not without assimilation.

"All the [illegal] undocumented people are a net benefit ."
Prove it.
I see the opposite.


I could go on.



« Last Edit: April 22, 2024, 10:17:37 AM by ccp »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69403
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #2171 on: April 22, 2024, 10:11:09 AM »
"Our diversity is our strength " only if "E pluribus unum."   

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18255
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #2172 on: April 22, 2024, 12:10:45 PM »
"Our diversity is our strength " only if "E pluribus unum."

Thumbs up to this.

I would add, besides not having an open border, you can't combine open border with unlimited free stuff and attract the right people.

Settlers came here not for an easy life, but because they were willing to do whatever it took to survive and then prosper.  Contrast that with the above.  Some come here today and work really hard today, roofers come to mind, but getting paid 'under the table' isn't part of GDP.  Prior to 1913, there was no federal income tax, there was no FICA, there was no IRS (it was a bureau, not a "service").  Working for money was not tax evasion.  There was no war on poverty, and I assume not much offered for free food, housing, healthcare, transportation, education etc.  You didn't get a free Obama phone.  If you came without money you had to work immediately for your first meal. 

Half of the first pilgrims perished the first winter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilgrims_(Plymouth_Colony)

No, an open border today is not a continuation of how we started and became a strong nation.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18512
    • View Profile
Moving from the Congress thread to here :
« Reply #2173 on: April 22, 2024, 01:28:40 PM »
I read Gallagher's case to not impeach Mayorkas and then re - listened to the below Mark Levin podcast referencing his case for impeachment:

Start at the 30 minute mark and listen through the 46:25 mark:

https://podcasts.apple.com/ly/podcast/mark-levin-podcast/id209377688

Levin makes the case as did Congress that Mayorkas is NOT GUILTY of MALADMINISTRATION (as Gallagher concludes) but of HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS.

I agree 100% with Levin, unless his study of it is incorrect but I doubt it.

Sure we all know Mayorkas would never have been convicted in a 51 to 48 Senate (assuming Murkowski stabs the Rs in the back again)

but at least the case would have been made, headlines, news stories highlighting the deliberate afront to the sovereignty of the US by its own Presidential administration would be worthy of the trial.




« Last Edit: April 22, 2024, 01:31:13 PM by ccp »