Author Topic: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State  (Read 353063 times)

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1250 on: June 07, 2022, 09:47:27 PM »
Doug:

I'd like to ask you to reconsider.

"(A)s long as this site mocks conservatives for voting and trying to secure and win elections, I will not be participating."

Ummm , , , forgive me, but this is not accurate.

THIS SITE does not "mocks conservatives for voting and trying to secure and win elections", GM does.

PS:  You have PM.

Well, I would phrase it as I mock anyone who thinks the utterly corrupted system in power now is going to let elections interfere with their plans.

Trying?

FAIL.

They blatantly stole 2020 and suffered NO consequences.

NONE.





G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The FBI's purge
« Reply #1253 on: June 08, 2022, 09:53:41 AM »
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jim-jordan-shares-allegations-of-fbi-purge-over-jan-6

Totalitarian states are always aggressive about ensuring the organs of state power are ideologically pure and will not question orders.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: WE.MUST.VOTE.HARDER!
« Reply #1254 on: June 08, 2022, 10:55:19 PM »


As local Somalis prepare to enter Doug's residence, Doug steels himself to vote even harder at the next election...

 :wink:


Thank you for the detailed answer G M.  I respect your view and especially your right to state it freely, but for as long as this site mocks conservatives for voting and trying to secure and win elections, I will not be participating.

The red state, blue state divide is not a clear split.  Blue states are typically 60-40 blue and red states are often 60-40 red, swing states are maybe 50-50 or 51-49.  That leaves maybe 100 million people on the wrong side of the divide, one way or the other.  As Crafty posed, how do you know who is on your side?  If you organize, you get 'listed'.

"  *You can't and won't outvote vote fraud.*  "

Begs the question, why can't we, especially if we've discovered how they cheated and control the process in many of those states.

But of course that prophecy comes true if enough conservatives are dissuaded from voting.  I don't want any part of it.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1255 on: June 09, 2022, 05:14:51 AM »
Wit noted, but one suspects that Doug is already armed , , ,

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1256 on: June 09, 2022, 07:44:55 AM »
Wit noted, but one suspects that Doug is already armed , , ,

I hope so.

Time is short.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
NRO: 18-24 months for firebombing police
« Reply #1257 on: June 09, 2022, 04:45:20 PM »
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/06/the-biden-justice-departments-shameful-pandering-to-bomb-throwing-rioters/

By THE EDITORS
June 7, 2022 6:30 AM
The foundational duty of government is to maintain public safety and order, without which neither liberty nor prosperity is possible. The dramatic story of the summer of 2020 was the outbreak of riots and protests following the murder of George Floyd. More than a dozen people were killed and a billion or more dollars in damages were caused, including the destruction of many businesses. This cried out for a vigorous response.

Instead, apparently viewing the cause as a righteous one, Democratic prosecutors at the federal, state, and local levels have been scandalously soft on the many crimes committed in the course of those riots and protests. Large numbers of offenders were let off scot-free by progressive prosecutors; even those whose crimes caused death have been given sentences no longer than ten years. In so doing, the progressive district attorneys and the Justice Department have imperiled public safety in our cities and undermined public confidence in the even-handed administration of law. It is unsurprising that urban crime and violence have spiked in many cities after the law failed to restore order or punish criminality.

The Biden administration has just added to this shameful spectacle by retroactively reducing the plea-bargained sentence in one of the most high-profile of those crimes, in which two white-shoe lawyers in Brooklyn threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car.

Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman were well-compensated attorneys in their early thirties when they joined the protesting mob in May 2020. Rahman was caught on tape throwing the firebomb into an unoccupied police car, and Mattis was arrested with more such improvised explosives in his car and was videotaped trying to hand them out to others. These are gravely serious crimes, more so than those committed by all but a tiny handful (at most) of the people charged in connection with January 6. An unapologetic Rahman told reporters later, “The only way they hear us is through violence.”

Mattis and Rahman pleaded guilty last year to one count of possessing and making an explosive device, a charge carrying up to ten years in prison. Both of them will quite properly be disbarred. Federal prosecutors sought to charge them with still more serious offenses for distribution but, in a shocking reversal, have now agreed to recommend a prison sentence of 18 to 24 months for charges carrying a maximum of five years. Even for a Justice Department that has bent over backwards to be lenient towards left-wing protesters while throwing the book at right-wing protesters, a retreat from a previous plea agreement is a dramatic display of favoritism for left-wing political violence.

Merrick Garland is right to make examples of those who rioted at the Capitol on January 6, and right to pursue genuinely violent right-wing extremism. Riots and violence originating on the political right should be met with a firm hand. But he and big-city progressive prosecutors have badly undermined the public legitimacy of those prosecutions by refusing to take the same approach to their own side. Justice that plays political favorites is not justice at all.




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1261 on: June 16, 2022, 01:39:05 PM »
it is now 45 days since the leak on May 2

still no leaker publicly identified

still no ruling..........

they can figure out how to crack blockchain

but they cannot ID a leaker from a handful of likely people ?

or they just mum ?


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18262
    • View Profile
Re: The rule of law; Abortion ruling
« Reply #1263 on: June 27, 2022, 09:13:00 AM »
Some note should be made here that this decision matters, even and especially with the Left. "Consequential", "earth shaking", what are all the quotes?

Isn't that a contradiction IN PART of the idea that all rule of law except woke Leftist rule of law has been lost, that elections and even who is on the Supreme Court doesn't matter anymore.

This 'end of the world' ruling, 50 years in coming, is (quite) a bit more than deck chair rearrangement IMHO, (even if our ship will eventually sink).
« Last Edit: June 27, 2022, 12:41:45 PM by DougMacG »


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Jane's Revenge an FBI operation?
« Reply #1265 on: June 27, 2022, 10:47:14 PM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The rule of law; Abortion ruling
« Reply #1266 on: June 27, 2022, 11:08:50 PM »
https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1050,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/109/810/815/original/b75d59f118cd6af0.jpg



Some note should be made here that this decision matters, even and especially with the Left. "Consequential", "earth shaking", what are all the quotes?

Isn't that a contradiction IN PART of the idea that all rule of law except woke Leftist rule of law has been lost, that elections and even who is on the Supreme Court doesn't matter anymore.

This 'end of the world' ruling, 50 years in coming, is (quite) a bit more than deck chair rearrangement IMHO, (even if our ship will eventually sink).

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18262
    • View Profile
Re: FBI-- praetorian guard of Biden & son
« Reply #1267 on: June 28, 2022, 12:40:18 AM »
After being a creepy dad, and skinny dipping as VP with female secret service forced to watch, now he hasn't acknowledged his latest grandchild, proven by DNA, making him an illegitimate grandfather - in addition to (likely) illegitimate President.

The fish stinks from the head.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1268 on: June 28, 2022, 06:08:25 AM »
Regarding the Revolver piece GM, I am confused.  Why would FBI be doing Jane's Revenge?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
so hutchinson's testimony is hearsay
« Reply #1269 on: June 28, 2022, 04:05:31 PM »
she wasn't even there:


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/28/not-possible-donald-trump-mocks-allegation-he-tried-to-grab-steering-wheel-of-the-presidential-limo-on-january-6/

wouldn't be admissible in court but suddenly this PROVES he was involved in seditious activity

OTOH it would not surprise me for a second if true.........


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
Secret Service agents deny claims
« Reply #1270 on: June 29, 2022, 05:31:22 AM »
https://www.mediaite.com/news/secret-service-is-reportedly-prepared-to-testify-trump-didnt-try-to-commandeer-limo-on-jan-6-despite-hutchinson-account/

they will not be invited to the committee hearing circus
they will not be invited on CNN to sit front and center to deny claims

and barely a mention, if at all , on the LEFT wing DNC propaganda machine

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
is this Liz Cheney giving Hutchinson a hug?
« Reply #1271 on: June 29, 2022, 08:08:07 AM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/29/pollak-l-a-times-8-bombshells-from-hutchinson-testimony-are-all-duds/

we can't see from this angle but she is whispering in her ear

"your financial future is now guaranteed"

 :wink:

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Brownshirts
« Reply #1272 on: June 29, 2022, 09:38:39 AM »
https://amgreatness.com/2022/06/28/america-is-not-immune-from-brown-shirts/

America Is Not Immune from Brown Shirts
Corrupt institutions could do nothing if there were no members of law enforcement, from the local police to FBI agents, willing to act as the brute enforcers of state dictates.
By Rod Thomson

June 28, 2022
In this moment of hope emerging from the almost unbelievable set of constitutionally informed Supreme Court rulings on freedom of religion, gun rights, and abortion, it’s easy to imagine the tide has turned. America is back!

Alas, even rulings as monumental as those of the past week are no antidote to the generations of cultural poison that continues to be mainlined into American society. The best we can do is to call upon the words of Winston Churchill after England had survived the Nazi air blitz: “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

At best. Because the poisoning is extensive and follows the veins such poisons find most suitable. And so, we are forced to belabor the obvious for a moment in which too many mostly college-poisoned Americans have a slippery grasp on reality.

Human nature is the same across races, ethnicities, and nationalities. There was nothing uniquely evil about the German human in 1939 or the French human during Napoleon’s reign or the Russian human under Stalin or the Chinese human under Mao or the Mongolian human riding with Ghengis Khan.

What was different in these situations were the culture-supported systems, or lack of them, put in place that allowed all of the worst of human nature to flourish. America, acknowledging the essential depravity of human nature, had once put in place systems designed to check the worst impulses of our nature. But with those American institutions breaking down under relentless leftist, anti-American assaults over more than two generations, we are seeing what was always true: American human nature is like all others.

And so in the past two years we have seen something many of us probably thought “can’t happen here”: The rise of the Brown Shirt within American law enforcement communities. This is particularly painful to acknowledge for those of us with beloved family members who are in law enforcement and are the opposite of Brown Shirts. But it nonetheless remains a truism that is denied at our own peril.

As a recent example, we saw Trump White House advisor Peter Navarro arrested for not responding to a subpoena from the dubious House January 6 select committee. He was scooped up at the D.C. airport soon after arriving from his D.C. home, and cuffed by a full team of FBI agents. Navarro is 72 years old, 145 pounds soaking wet, and lives within three minutes of FBI headquarters. He has cooperated with federal investigators as far as executive privilege allowed him to do. But with Donald Trump claiming executive privilege, Navarro was ethically bound to not respond.

FBI agents could have walked to his home, or asked him to turn himself in, which he says he would have done and his history suggests is the case. But they chose to make this a very public arrest, a strikingly unveiled threat to others who refuse to comply with state narratives.

Coincidentally—by which I mean not coincidentally at all—Navarro had filed a civil lawsuit against the government days earlier for violating his civil rights. Their response was swift and humiliating.

At the airport, Navarro, a smart lawyer, said he wanted to call his lawyer. He demanded to know the charges. But the lead agent took his phone and disallowed it and Navarro was taken into solitary and, he says, strip-searched. That’s multiple constitutional violations, which just don’t seem to matter to most American institutions, including the FBI.

“They went with this shock-and-awe terrorist strategy,” Navarro told Tucker Carlson on Fox News. “They let me go to the airport and then take me with five agents, like an al-Qaeda terrorist, lock me into a car and the next thing I know I’m in leg irons, handcuffs, strip-searched.”

Abuses of Power
This has been going on for a while. And it’s not always simply partisan. Since COVID, it has been more and more clear that most of the response was on behalf of the power of the state and favor pharmaceutical firms, and little more.

During the worthless lockdowns, we witnessed a mother arrested in Idaho for taking her child to the park, a lone individual surfing and another walking on the beach in California were also arrested, among endless other examples. We saw businesses raided for defying state orders to shut down seeing that their big chain competitors across the street were allowed to stay open. We saw people dragged out of public places for not wearing ineffectual face masks or not showing vaccination papers. Papers!

On other fronts, we’ve seen parents targeted for speaking out against schools allowing young men to use the women’s bathrooms and shower facilities. Parents have been investigated and threatened for speaking up at public meetings. And parents who have spoken up have had those opinions included in their children’s educational reports. We saw a father at a Virginia school board meeting tackled and arrested for pointing out, rightly, that the district was hiding a trans rapist who had assaulted his daughter in the girl’s bathroom.

In these and in countless other situations, pundits critical of the actions tend to blame the policy-setting entities, from school boards to the Justice Department, all of which, in fact, are behaving like oppressors. But here is the blunt, painful truth: Those institutions could do nothing if there were no members of law enforcement, from the local police to FBI agents, willing to act as the brute enforcers of state dictates.

They may be a minority, but they are more than enough. Some are on board with policy, some will say they are just doing their jobs—“following orders” if we carry out our analogy to Germany in the 1930s. Some I have talked to, including high-ranking law enforcement, say they would never follow such orders and in discussions with their colleagues agree there are lines they would not cross.

That requires a great deal of fortitude. Some humans have it. Many do not. History bears this out.

Crumbling Foundations
But until the mid-20th century, America had systems in place that provided checks on human nature running rampant. The balance of powers instituted between branches of the federal government and between the federal government and the states actually drew upon the inevitability of human nature turning toward rapaciousness to create a natural friction that kept all of the government entities in check. Human nature at each level and in the various branches would work in ways that kept checks on all the others. And ultimately an informed and moral people were to be relied upon to keep all of them in check.

But none of that is in place like it was.

It is painfully clear with the proliferation of things like drag queen story hours and shocking degradations of parents actually taking their young children to drag clubs with dollar bills; or allowing their very young children to transition; or public schools promoting and hiding such activities from parents. It is becoming systemic and it’s stomach-turning. It is also the most recent evidence of the collapse of a once religious and moral people.

John Adams was absolutely prophetic when he said: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

Too many of the American people are no longer religious or moral in any grounded, traditional way. They are too narcissistically preoccupied with TikTok and their phones, unable to think in any critical fashion, and as parents tend to accede all education to public schools that increasingly only teach our children what to think. College students are taught to shout down anyone who disagrees, a shocking transmogrification of the purpose of university. The checks and balances are failing and the power of the state is increasing.

This religious and moral failing naturally trickles down through our institutions. Congress has ceded large swathes of power to the executive branch because for generations, the majority of the members of Congress chose the expediency of re-election over everything else. The current executive branch administration brazenly ignores court rulings—even by the Supreme Court—and does what it wants. It is not the first.

The First Amendment provided for a highly protected freedom of the press. The founders knew well the importance of the Fourth Estate in holding the most powerful people—specifically, those in government—accountable to the people. Unfortunately, the media that once provided basic information, even if it was with a bias, that all sides could access, ceded this unifying territory to becoming little more than the communications arm of one party.

Americans now are operating under two sets of information and “facts” that increasingly make it impossible to even have a conversation. And this makes it so much easier to demonize those from the other universe of information.

The First Amendment also provided for freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Both of these were trampled and greatly weakened as pastors were arrested and churches closed down by armed law enforcement during COVID while the local Home Depot and Walmart remained open. But both were also ceded away by people who no longer are religious or even understand the rudiments of free speech. If Americans were the religious people they once were, this could never have happened.

Considering this crumbling of these basic American institutions, along with the degradation of Americans themselves, it should come as no surprise that even law enforcement is being eroded. The more we turn away from foundational truths, the more this will be the case.

Don’t think we could ever see actual Brown Shirts on American streets? Then you will be the most surprised, because we’re already seeing it.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1273 on: June 29, 2022, 10:03:38 AM »
 :cry:

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
https://ace.mu.nu/archives/399801.php

https://www.mediaite.com/news/secret-service-is-reportedly-prepared-to-testify-trump-didnt-try-to-commandeer-limo-on-jan-6-despite-hutchinson-account/

they will not be invited to the committee hearing circus
they will not be invited on CNN to sit front and center to deny claims

and barely a mention, if at all , on the LEFT wing DNC propaganda machine

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
rachal madcow brings on WP reporter
« Reply #1275 on: June 29, 2022, 02:03:53 PM »
to call secret service agent who deny Hutchinson's story as ass kissers

and to play up  of the image of 25 yo low level aid Hutchinson as though she is the most credible because she is the LAST person who would say anything bad about the orange haired man:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/secret-service-agents-denying-cassidy-hutchinsons-claim-were-trump-yes-men-wapo-reporter-tells-maddow

so this PULITZER PRIZE winning WP reporter tells us hearsay to verify the hearsay of the low level aide -

and BTW she was not a low level aide - she was essentially working as the WH press secretary we are told.

« Last Edit: June 29, 2022, 02:26:00 PM by ccp »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
sec. serv. trump too u'hem , heavy set to get to steering wheel
« Reply #1276 on: June 30, 2022, 03:31:46 PM »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-girth-prevent-him-actually-200030703.html
Jan 6 committee

this is NOT evidence and should be ignored while 25 yo low level aid is mother Theresa

and everything she says is "compelling" and "credible "

end of story...... as far as they are concerned

Cheney has made herself into  a total farce

the spurned woman from the Shakespeare phrase

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18262
    • View Profile
EPA Ruling
« Reply #1277 on: July 02, 2022, 05:58:48 AM »
Make sure EPA ruling is mentioned in our deep state thread.  A BFD.

1.  Make them follow the rule of law.  Laws start as bills in Congress, get voted on by the people's representatives, etc.

2.  Defund the parts of the government that are BS or undermine our country..  Shrink, downsize, send powers back to the states.

3.  Fill essential positions with people who have the best interests of the US in mind.

No one said it would be easy.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2022, 06:08:39 AM by Crafty_Dog »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
ET: SCOTUS security chief demands MD gov protect Justices
« Reply #1280 on: July 03, 2022, 06:02:33 AM »
Supreme Court Security Chief Demands Maryland Governor, County, Do More to Protect Justices
By Matthew Vadum July 2, 2022 Updated: July 2, 2022biggersmaller Print

0:00
5:41



1

Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley sent letters to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) and Montgomery County, Md., Executive Marc Elrich (D) demanding that they enforce existing laws and do a better job protecting justices whose lives have been threatened.

Greta Van Susteren of Newsmax revealed the existence of the letters in two posts on Twitter time-stamped the evening of July 1.

The letters came after authorities foiled a June 8 attempt to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh at his Maryland home in the suburbs of the nation’s capital.

According to an FBI affidavit (pdf), suspect Nicholas John Roske, 26, of Simi Valley, Calif., said he wanted to kill Kavanaugh to prevent him from voting to overturn abortion rights and gun control laws. Roske, who was found with a pistol, ammunition, pepper spray, and other items, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Maryland on June 15 and formally charged with attempting to murder a Supreme Court justice, contrary to federal law. He has entered a plea of not guilty.

Other individuals have threatened the lives of various justices, and protests at justices’ homes in Maryland have intensified in recent weeks.

As Marshal, Curley is responsible for court security, the court’s police force, and the personal safety of the justices, wrote Hogan on July 1 requesting that “the Maryland State Police, in conjunction with local authorities as appropriate, enforce laws that prohibit picketing outside of the homes of Supreme Court Justices who live in Maryland.”

Curley wrote that state law provides a person “may not intentionally assemble with another in a manner that disrupts a person’s right to tranquility in the person’s home.” Violators face 90 days in prison or a $100 fine or both and courts are allowed to issue injunctions against the conduct and award damages, she added.

Montgomery County prohibits picketing “in front of or adjacent to any private residence,” the letter states, adding that violators face fines of $100 to $200 plus 30 days in prison.

Curley noted that in a joint letter with Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R), Hogan had said he was “deeply concerned” about demonstrations outside the homes of justices in Maryland that used “threatening language” and that jeopardized “the integrity of our American judicial system and the safety of our citizens.”

“Since then, protest activity at Justices’ homes, as well as threatening activity, has only increased,” Curley wrote. “For weeks on end, large groups of protesters chanting slogans, using bullhorns, and banging drums have picketed Justices’ homes in Maryland,” she said, adding this “is exactly the kind of conduct” that state and county laws forbid.

Curley’s letter to Elrich reminded the county executive of his enforcement obligations and of a comment he made after a recent protest in front of a justice’s home in the county. “If everybody’s going to protest everybody who does something at their houses, we’re going to have a very hard time maintaining civil society,” she quoted Elrich saying.

Meanwhile, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Fairfax County, Va., Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano (D) have been widely criticized for refusing to enforce federal and state laws against pro-abortion activists who have been threatening and attempting to intimidate Supreme Court justices and their families who reside in Virginia, according to a report by Hans A. von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation. This failure to act is egging on the “summer of rage” against the court that left-wing activists have promised, the scholar argues.

Federal law, von Spakovsky writes, makes it a criminal offense to parade or picket “near a building or residence occupied or used by [a federal] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.”

Von Spakovsky urges Youngkin and Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares (R) “to step in and use their statutory power to arrest, prosecute, and seek the maximum penalty for every day the protesters are violating the law.”

Congress took action last month.

In response to the threats, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) introduced the proposed Supreme Court Police Parity Act on May 5, three days after Politico published a leaked court opinion showing the justices were poised to overturn the abortion precedent Roe v. Wade, something they ended up doing in a June 24 ruling. The leak was followed by a nationwide outpouring of anger and threats by pro-abortion activists. Curley is investigating the leak but few details of the probe have been made public.

The bill moved quickly through Congress and was signed into law by President Joe Biden on June 16.

The measure grants the Supreme Court “security-related authorities equivalent to the legislative and executive branches.” It also gives the court marshal authority to provide protection for members of the justices’ immediate families and for “any officer of the Supreme Court if the Marshal determines such protection is necessary.”

The Epoch Times reached out to Hogan and Elrich but they did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
Hutchison refers to 1/6 Committee as BS
« Reply #1281 on: July 04, 2022, 07:50:56 AM »
when asking for right wing help :

https://www.conservativereview.com/exclusive-text-messages-show-cassidy-hutchinson-referring-to-january-6-committee-as-bs-2657603133.html

this leads me to believe she is expecting something in return
(besides "free" legal representation) , all with strings attached........from the LEFT

« Last Edit: July 04, 2022, 08:51:51 AM by ccp »




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1285 on: July 11, 2022, 08:02:18 AM »
I wish GWP was less cluttered with extraneous adverts.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
AMcC: Zeldin
« Reply #1288 on: July 23, 2022, 09:12:17 PM »
Two Tiers of Justice: The Violent Attack against Lee Zeldin

A group of people attending Congressman Lee Zeldin's stump speech gather around after an alleged attack on Zeldin in Fairport, N.Y., July 21, 2022. (Ian Winner/Handout via Reuters)

By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
July 23, 2022 12:25 PM

I have a column in the New York Post about the violent assault on Lee Zeldin by a man wielding a deadly weapon — a brass-knuckles-type contraption with spiked prongs (and bear in mind that the assailant, whom we must describe as “alleged,” is a military veteran trained in close combat). New York state penal law and procedure have become such a joke that the alleged assailant was not only charged with attempted assault in the second degree (did that look like a mere attempt to you?) but was released on his own recognizance.

By good fortune alone, Zeldin was not seriously hurt. But under Democrat-backed “reforms,” this means the “attempted” assault, though classified as a felony (Class D), is one for which release may not be conditioned on the posting of bail. New York, moreover, is the only state in the nation which does not permit detention based on a judicial finding that the suspect poses a danger to the community (as opposed to a flight risk).

Zeldin is the Republican candidate for governor of New York. Not ironically, he addressed the insanity of New York’s bail laws in the speech during which he was attacked — at a VFW event in Perinton, N.Y. (in Monroe County near Rochester).

Zeldin also happens to be a member of the United States House of Representatives. That makes him a federal officer for purposes of the laws against assaults on same. (The cognizable officials, which include officers of any branch of the U.S. government, are listed in Section 1114, the statute covering murder and attempted murder. This list is referenced in Section 111, which covers assaults on federal officers.)

If there is going to be a meaningful prosecution of Zeldin’s attacker, it will have to be done in federal court. There, the accused would face a real bail proceeding, in which he could be detained as a danger to the community (under Section 3142(e)). Even if not detained, he would be released only on stringent conditions (e.g., house arrest, bracelet monitoring) along with the posting of bail.



Democrats’ ‘Contraception’ Bill Overrides Religious-Freedom Law and Protects Abortion
I write here to add just one thing: If Zeldin were a Democrat, his assailant would already have been arrested by the FBI, and he’d be in custody after his initial bail hearing in federal court, at the urging of federal prosecutors from the office of Trini E. Ross, the Biden-appointed United States attorney for the Western District of New York (which has jurisdiction over Monroe County, where the assault occurred).

Moreover, if Zeldin were a Democrat, one of the biggest stories in the country, in tandem with the brazen, near lethal assault of a New York Democrat, would be the fact that the assailant was a military veteran, and thus likely tied to some white-supremacist militia at war with “our democracy.” There would be renewed calls by Democrats, echoed by their media chorus, for passage of their Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.




Andrew C. McCarthy
ANDREW C. MCCARTHY is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of BALL OF COLLUSION: THE PLOT TO RIG AN ELECTION AND DESTROY A PRESIDENCY. @andrewcmccarthy


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18262
    • View Profile
Re: AMcC: Zeldin
« Reply #1290 on: July 24, 2022, 02:04:36 PM »
Sounds to me like
ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
is on our side.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: AMcC: Zeldin
« Reply #1291 on: July 24, 2022, 02:27:58 PM »
Sounds to me like
ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
is on our side.

Lots of people pretending to be on our side that aren’t.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Peter Navarro
« Reply #1292 on: July 24, 2022, 11:47:23 PM »
I'm thinking to donate to the defense fund:

https://peternavarro.com/urgent-message-from-peter-navarro/

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18262
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Navarro
« Reply #1293 on: July 25, 2022, 01:49:48 AM »
I'm thinking to donate to the defense fund:

https://peternavarro.com/urgent-message-from-peter-navarro/

Yes they deserve all our support, and I hate giving up anonymity to join the list to be targeted next by the tyrannists.

We should also give to Liz Cheney's primary opponent and the opponent of every member of the committee.  And to all great swing district candidates and knock these people as far from power as we can.

https://www.hagemanforwyoming.com/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1294 on: July 25, 2022, 06:19:05 AM »
"We should also give to Liz Cheney's primary opponent and the opponent of every member of the committee."

Did you see Bret Baier's interview of same yesterday:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcKrCMcvyFk


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69424
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1295 on: July 25, 2022, 08:24:45 AM »
She does not address the absence of cross examination, witnesses in secret without them allowed lawyers or copies of the testimony, the failure to mention that Trump offered 20,000 National Guard, the denial of Jim Jacobs and the other one, etc etc

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18518
    • View Profile
Re: The war on the rule of law; the Deep State
« Reply #1296 on: July 25, 2022, 08:46:17 AM »
"She does not address the absence of cross examination, witnesses in secret without them allowed lawyers or copies of the testimony, the failure to mention that Trump offered 20,000 National Guard, the denial of Jim Jacobs and the other one, etc etc"

I thought Bret did good job of confronting her on these facts
and even pointed out how she did not answer them
all she would say " we need to save Democracy over and over again"
despite ignoring the problems the people who voted her into office are concerned about which is not her 24/7 divine mission (like a woman spurned - obsession for revenge)

I liked when Bret asked her if this is about '24.

She smiled and did not give a straight answer one way or another
I would never vote for her under almost any circumstances
every again .




G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
It's the FBI's birthday!
« Reply #1298 on: July 26, 2022, 02:15:06 PM »