Author Topic: Congressman Dan Crenshaw  (Read 505 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69127
    • View Profile
Congressman Dan Crenshaw
« on: October 27, 2022, 05:03:11 PM »
Midterms Are a Time for Choosing for Republicans
Nearly six decades later, the GOP is divided and Ronald Reagan’s famous speech still resonates.
By Dan Crenshaw
Oct. 27, 2022 1:05 pm ET

SAVE

PRINT

TEXT
297

Ronald Reagan gives his A Time for Choosing speech, Oct. 27, 1964.
PHOTO: RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY

Ronald Reagan gave his famous speech “A Time For Choosing” a week before Election Day 1964. Nearly six decades later, the speech remains relevant, and the parallels to the circumstances we face today are striking. The battles against big government and Marxist do-gooders have changed only in the sense that they have intensified. Americans are still debating our role in the world—even as war rages in Europe. We are uncertain of our future, as we were then.

OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH
WSJ Opinion Potomac Watch
Nine Million Votes, With Candidates Still Debating


SUBSCRIBE
Reagan decried a bloated welfare state, a militant tax-and-spending regime in Washington, and the blatant bribing of Americans with their own tax dollars for their votes. Full Democratic control of Washington over the past two years has produced the kind of government Reagan could have imagined only in a fever dream. The inflationary Inflation Reduction Act and the unconstitutional forgiveness of student loans via executive fiat were shameless attempts to buy votes before a midterm election.

The choice before Americans next month is simple. Will we sell our votes to politicians promising us prosperity if only we give them more of our money? Will we choose to be free—acknowledging the risks and challenges that inevitably accompany freedom—or will we choose to be dependent? Will we, as Reagan said, “believe in our capacity for self-government, or abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves”?

As Republicans, we believe in the challenge of freedom and individual responsibility. We affirm, as the Founders did, that prosperity and innovation and greatness are born from free enterprise, and that the government exists to protect that freedom, not diminish it. The good news is that polling indicates most Americans agree. This election may well be a referendum on the kind of governance Reagan warned us about decades ago.

But it is also a time for choosing for conservatives. We have to choose how we will fight for the great vision that Reagan articulated.

The right is divided these days, which is odd, considering that by any measure there are fewer ideological and policy differences within the Republican Party than ever. Yet factions persist. The divisions are becoming more severe and more toxic. Some in our movement insist on sorting themselves into labels: populists, nationalists, MAGA, mainstream—but without any real clue as to what ideas separate these groups. These groupings function more like grade-school cliques than serious political divisions. They are about style over substance.

These divisions are manufactured by opportunists—mostly online and on television—who can’t string a sentence together about serious public policy but are quick to label anyone and everyone a “RINO” or “establishment sell-out.”


These are the people who say they fight for the conservative movement but in reality only fight for attention, fundraising dollars, clicks and views. They know that Americans have been conditioned to be attentive to Kardashian-like drama, and so they serve it up in our political arena. It’s unhealthy, and we have to stop rewarding it. It makes us seem bitter, unserious and unlikable.

To beat the increasingly radical left, we have to unite, and we have to fight to win. In politics, you win only when you’re persuading those who disagree with you.

This is the choice before conservatives: Will we be happy warriors or furious flame throwers? When we communicate, will we persuade? Or will we serve up a limited menu of red meat? Will we succumb to our grievances and bitterness as the left advances, take the bait they’ve set for us, and become the caricatures they want us to be? Will we do the hard work, play the long game, win majorities and sustain them, in order to implement policy?

I would rather we follow the electoral success of President Reagan, achieved not through grievance but through inspiration. We may win this one election off the coattails of the other side’s seemingly endless incompetence. But we will win the next 10 elections with inspiration, with vision and with the time-tested principles that Reagan defended so well.

That is the choice before us. Let us choose wisely.

Mr. Crenshaw, a Republican, represents Texas’ Second Congressional District



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
This is another time I feel Tucker is off the mark
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2024, 09:01:13 AM »
not uncommon for me.

worth asking the questions true
but playing right into CCP's hands
in my view.
plus Tucker is taking the position of it being banned not divested to US interest
just like CD pointed out earlier that is the last resort not the desired result.

Our people's minds are being manipulated and the results collected and stored for war against us.

I still can't see this any other way .
If we cannot ever defend ourselves against a determined enemy due to worry about falling off a slope of libertarianism then we certainly will lose. re
Like having laws that protect the illegals (birth right citizenship, declare oneself a refugee, no hold and send back enforcement then this is another example of how our enemies use our freedoms against us to screw us over.

Though of course the immigration issue included Democrats as our enemies.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69127
    • View Profile
Re: Congressman Dan Crenshaw
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2024, 12:24:26 PM »
I love Tucker, but more and more I find myself coming to different conclusions than him.