Author Topic: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mueller, Durham, Mar a Lago, Spermy Daniels etc  (Read 261709 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
FBI left targets in dark
« Reply #350 on: November 29, 2017, 10:04:13 AM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Andrew McCarthy
« Reply #351 on: December 01, 2017, 12:53:37 PM »
To help me sort out all the lib hysteria:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454269/michael-flynn-plea-no-breakthrough-russia-investigation

I am going to have to not watch the news for 6 months.  All the news is going to be tough to put up with.
no respite after 8 yrs obama

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #353 on: December 02, 2017, 01:05:48 AM »
Doesn't the legal language specify that additional charges are not precluded? 

What about the Turkish money Flynn took?  As best as I can tell what he did there was seriously illegal and seriously wrong.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #354 on: December 02, 2017, 07:13:05 AM »
"What about the Turkish money Flynn took?  As best as I can tell what he did there was seriously illegal and seriously wrong."

That may be true but that , however I don' t think is that is within the scope of what of what the the SPECIAL counsel is supposed to be .  He is not and *independent causel*.

As Levin points out he can turn over corrupt business dealings to a regular type of prosecutor .  Here is another opinion along the same lines posted on CNN no less though it is 3 or more months old..

Mueller is digging up any dirt and everyone in site and using what ever he finds to intimidate and "break" everyone around Trump to get them to turn on Trump. As Dershowitz no less pointed out why is anything Flynn says suddenly credible when his main crime so far is lying to the FBI?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/06/opinions/rosenstein-should-curb-mueller-whittaker-opinion/index.html

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
McCarthy: Mueller is all political
« Reply #355 on: December 02, 2017, 07:25:53 AM »
Andrew McCarthy: this is ALL political and Trump should appoint his own independent counsel to look into Obama's collusion with Iran under the guise of a counter intelligence investigation:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454293/robert-mueller-trump-russia-investigation-michael-flynn-obama-administration-foreign-policy-israel





« Last Edit: December 02, 2017, 07:27:28 AM by ccp »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #356 on: December 02, 2017, 08:02:36 AM »
Dang,  McCarthy is good!


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
WSJ: Mueller's Credibility Problem
« Reply #358 on: December 04, 2017, 09:16:41 PM »
Mueller’s Credibility Problem
The special counsel is stonewalling Congress and protecting the FBI.
Robert Mueller
Robert Mueller Photo: thew/epa-efe/rex/shutterstock/EPA/Shutterstock
By The Editorial Board
Dec. 4, 2017 7:05 p.m. ET
692 COMMENTS

Donald Trump is his own worst enemy, as his many ill-advised tweets on the weekend about Michael Flynn, the FBI and Robert Mueller’s Russia probe demonstrate. But that doesn’t mean that Mr. Mueller and the Federal Bureau of Investigation deserve a pass about their motives and methods, as new information raises troubling questions.

The Washington Post and the New York Times reported Saturday that a lead FBI investigator on the Mueller probe, Peter Strzok, was demoted this summer after it was discovered he’d sent anti- Trump texts to a mistress. As troubling, Mr. Mueller and the Justice Department kept this information from House investigators, despite Intelligence Committee subpoenas that would have exposed those texts. They also refused to answer questions about Mr. Strzok’s dismissal and refused to make him available for an interview.

The news about Mr. Strzok leaked only when the Justice Department concluded it couldn’t hold out any longer, and the stories were full of spin that praised Mr. Mueller for acting “swiftly” to remove the agent. Only after these stories ran did Justice agree on Saturday to make Mr. Strzok available to the House.

This is all the more notable because Mr. Strzok was a chief lieutenant to former FBI Director James Comey and played a lead role investigating alleged coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election. Mr. Mueller then gave him a top role in his special-counsel probe. And before all this Mr. Strzok led the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails and sat in on the interview she gave to the FBI shortly before Mr. Comey publicly exonerated her in violation of Justice Department practice.

Oh, and the woman with whom he supposedly exchanged anti-Trump texts, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, worked for both Mr. Mueller and deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, who was accused of a conflict of interest in the Clinton probe when it came out that Clinton allies had donated to the political campaign of Mr. McCabe’s wife. The texts haven’t been publicly released, but it’s fair to assume their anti-Trump bias must be clear for Mr. Mueller to reassign such a senior agent.

There is no justification for withholding all of this from Congress, which is also investigating Russian influence and has constitutional oversight authority. Justice and the FBI have continued to defy legal subpoenas for documents pertaining to both surveillance warrants and the infamous Steele dossier that was financed by the Clinton campaign and relied on anonymous Russian sources.

While there is no evidence so far of Trump-Russia collusion, House investigators have turned up enough material to suggest that anti-Trump motives may have driven Mr. Comey’s FBI investigation. The public has a right to know whether the Steele dossier inspired the Comey probe, and whether it led to intrusive government eavesdropping on campaign satellites such as Carter Page.

All of this reinforces our doubts about Mr. Mueller’s ability to conduct a fair and credible probe of the FBI’s considerable part in the Russia-Trump drama. Mr. Mueller ran the bureau for 12 years and is fast friends with Mr. Comey, whose firing by Mr. Trump triggered his appointment as special counsel. The reluctance to cooperate with a congressional inquiry compounds doubts related to this clear conflict of interest.
***

Mr. Mueller’s media protectorate argues that anyone critical of the special counsel is trying to cover for Mr. Trump. But the alleged Trump-Russia ties are the subject of numerous probes—Mr. Mueller’s, and those of various committees in the House and Senate. If there is any evidence of collusion, Democrats and Mr. Mueller’s agents will make sure it is spread far and wide.

Yet none of this means the public shouldn’t also know if, and how, America’s most powerful law-enforcement agency was influenced by Russia or partisan U.S. actors. All the more so given Mr. Comey’s extraordinary intervention in the 2016 campaign, which Mrs. Clinton keeps saying turned the election against her. The history of the FBI is hardly without taint.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mr. Mueller, is also playing an increasingly questionable role in resisting congressional oversight. Justice has floated multiple reasons for ignoring House subpoenas, none of them persuasive.

First it claimed cooperation would hurt the Mueller probe, but his prosecutions are proceeding apace. Then Justice claimed that providing House investigators with classified material could hurt security or sources. But House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes has as broad a security clearance as nearly anyone in government. Recently Justice said it can’t interfere with a probe by the Justice Department Inspector General—as if an IG trumps congressional oversight.

Mr. Nunes is understandably furious at the Strzok news, on top of the other stonewalling. He asked Justice to meet the rest of his committee’s demands by close of business Monday, and if it refuses Congress needs to pursue contempt citations against Mr. Rosenstein and new FBI Director Christopher Wray.

The latest news supports our view that Mr. Mueller is too conflicted to investigate the FBI and should step down in favor of someone more credible. The investigation would surely continue, though perhaps with someone who doesn’t think his job includes protecting the FBI and Mr. Comey from answering questions about their role in the 2016 election.



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #361 on: December 06, 2017, 04:03:28 AM »
I wouldn't bet the Judge against Dershowitz.

Judge has been off base before.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Judicial Watch on recent developments
« Reply #363 on: December 06, 2017, 06:23:40 PM »
JW has been the tip of the spear for much of this-- very strong work!  I am a donor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqz00xzWpoU

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
NRO: Andrew McCarthy on Strzock
« Reply #364 on: December 07, 2017, 04:51:01 AM »
Not quite how I see things, but McCarthy's analysis is always deserving of serious read and respect:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454413/fbi-agent-peter-strzok-justice-department
« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 07:02:48 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #367 on: December 07, 2017, 02:33:01 PM »
anyone care to wager if this Mueller thing continues till the '18 election?

 :wink:

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Russian conspiracy, Comey, Mills and Abedine Going to Jail with Gen. Flynn
« Reply #368 on: December 08, 2017, 12:35:34 PM »
Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedine told the FBI (Strzok and Laufman) that they were not aware of Clinton’s server until after she left the State Department.

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/05/werent-huma-abedin-cheryl-mills-charged-lied-peter-strzok-fbi/
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Another Member of Mueller's Deep State All-Stars Defended the Hillary IT Aide
« Reply #369 on: December 08, 2017, 04:52:58 PM »
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/372883.php

December 08, 2017
OMG: Another Member of Mueller's Deep State All-Stars Defended the Hillary IT Aide Who Destroyed Her Blackberries (Federal Evidence) with a Hammer
Shut. It. Down.

From NiceDeb:

Aaron Zebley served previously as Mueller’s chief of staff at the FBI and as a senior counselor in the National Security Division at the Department of Justice. He also served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the National Security and Terrorism Unit in Alexandria, Virginia.
He is often referred to in the media as Mueller's "right-hand man."

Also, in 2015 when he was a lawyer, he represented Justin Cooper, the IT staffer who personally set up Hillary Clinton's unsecure server in her Chappaqua home, Fox News' Tucker Carlson revealed on his show Thursday.

Cooper, it so happens, is also the aide who destroyed Clinton's old BlackBerries with a hammer.

Documents obtained by Fox News show that Senate investigators grew frustrated with Zebley after being repeatedly stonewalled when they were trying to set up a meeting with Cooper.

 
Jordan Schachtel

@JordanSchachtel
Updated partial list of partisans on Team Mueller:
-An attorney for Ben Rhodes.
-Attendee of Hillary's election night party
-Guy who cleared Hillary of wrongdoing+texted anti-Trump bias.
-Man who helped Hillary cover up evidence by smashing her Blackberry to pieces
Shut It Down?
12:29 PM - Dec 8, 2017
 29 29 Replies   247 247 Retweets   353 353 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy


That tweet says, at the end, "the man who helped Hillary cover up evidence by smashing her Blackberry to pieces." That's not accurate -- it's the lawyer for the guy who smashed the Blackberries to pieces.

But you get the point.

In related news, the LAPD has assigned the former members of OJ Simpon's legal team to finally find "The Real Killer."

Makes as much sense as hiring Hillary's Valkyries to investigate Trump.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #370 on: December 08, 2017, 05:34:48 PM »

Remember from DAY ONE  when Newt Gingrich heard about the lawyers Mueller was hiring he said stop it now - shut it down and Trump should do it.   ( I don't know how he would get away with it though)

It must be great to be a BIG DC lawyer .  Just think of their high fees and how self serving keeping this  investigation open is not only for political reasons  but (by finding anything and everything they can dream of)   to keep this thing going.

BTW, why are not their  fees public ?  Think of the publicity they get as well to  pad  their  CV .  Most are or will be  Dem Party darlings  .



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #372 on: December 09, 2017, 11:50:52 AM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/us/politics/hope-hicks-russia-trump-fbi.html



Money paragraph:  "In some ways, the Russian outreach to Ms. Hicks undercuts the idea that the Russian government had established deep ties to the Trump campaign before the election. If it had, Russian officials might have found a better entrèe to the White House than unprompted emails to Ms. Hicks.”




G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Not crooked at all...
« Reply #376 on: December 12, 2017, 07:57:02 PM »
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/283195/

DECEMBER 12, 2017
SO I JUST HAD AN INTERESTING EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S PRESS OFFICE:

Me:

I’m hearing from a source that Lisa Page was involved in approving Peter Strzok’s warrant requests to the FISC and possibly elsewhere. Can you confirm or deny if this was the case? And please tell me what her job title and function are in your office. Thanks.

Them (via spokesman Joshua Stueve):

Lisa Page, who was an attorney on detail to the Special Counsel’s office, returned to the FBI’s Office of the General Counsel in mid-July.

Me again:

Thank you but that doesn’t answer my question. What role did Lisa Page have in the handling of warrant applications, and in particular those involving Peter Strzok?

Them again:

I’ll decline to comment further.

Well, then.

Page, remember, is the FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair and exchanging anti-Trump texts. Perhaps someone with more resources than I will be able to get to the bottom of this. (Bumped).

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: VDH: One concidence too many
« Reply #378 on: December 13, 2017, 06:33:54 AM »
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454543/mueller-investigation-too-many-anti-trump-coincidences

Nine bias coincidences documented too many to serve justice with any level of confidence, and more coming every day it seems.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
VDH does it again
« Reply #379 on: December 13, 2017, 07:27:04 AM »
****VDH: One concidence too many
« Reply #377 on: Today at 07:28:38 AM »
Reply with quote
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454543/mueller-investigation-too-many-anti-trump-coincidences****

VDH , again does great job summarizing the air tight case that Mueller and his team are out to GET the President.  This is their brand of justice for someone who is not a liberal and or disses the DC estab.




G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
"Insurance Policy"
« Reply #380 on: December 13, 2017, 09:31:21 AM »
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/372933.php

December 13, 2017
Strzok Wrote That Trump Could Not Be Permitted to Become President, and That an "Insurance Policy" Was Necessary
Jim Jordan connected up two of Strzok's most conspiracy-suggesting outbursts to the timing of the the FBI's -- probably actually Strzok's -- application for a FISA warrant to "spy on Americans."

That video is below, but here are the two text chains he focuses on.

 
Shannon Bream

@ShannonBream
Strzok/Page texts

LP – And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace. (links to NYT article)

PS – ... I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps
7:04 PM - Dec 12, 2017
 205 205 Replies   1,901 1,901 Retweets   2,564 2,564 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy


So there you have Strzok saying he can "protect the country at many levels" from the "menace" of Trump in his position as an FBI agent.

Then he talks about a conversation that happened in Andrew McCabe's office-- remember, McCabe's wife ran for office in Virginia as a Democrat and was partly bankrolled by Friend of Hillary Terry MacAuliffe -- in which McCabe, Lisa Page, and Andrew Strzok apparently spent work-time discussing the menace of a Trump presidency.

Although Lisa Page threw out a "path" by which she claimed Trump could not win te race -- and we don't know what this "path" was about -- Strzok was still too worried about the prospect of it, and announced "I'm afraid we can't take that risk" and cryptically refers to an "insurance policy" against that possibility:

 
Bret Baier

@BretBaier
Text-from Peter Strzok to Lisa Page (Andy is Andrew McCabe): "I want to believe the path u threw out 4 consideration in Andy's office-that there's no way he gets elected-but I'm afraid we can't take that risk.It's like an insurance policy in unlikely event u die be4 you're 40"

6:32 AM - Dec 13, 2017
 376 376 Replies   1,658 1,658 Retweets   2,306 2,306 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy


The video below begins mid-quotation, but Jordan is quoting from the texts above. He knits these together to show that Strzok was a man who considered himself the last insurance policy against a Trump presidency, which just might be why he then packaged up the Steele dossier and presented it to a FISA court to get warrants to begin spying on Trump associates.





ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #383 on: December 14, 2017, 05:28:37 AM »
He must not be able to come out with it from his own legal woes involving such matters.

Either a lot of these women are enjoying the limelight or are getting paid off.  I have no idea which allegations are true or not.  Certainly some are over the top.

" he propositioned me on an elevator at Madison Square Garden" -  I am sure she has PTSD for such a travesty the rest of her life.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The "Insurance Policy" chart
« Reply #384 on: December 14, 2017, 11:23:37 AM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
even NR is calling for investigation into Mueller and his team
« Reply #385 on: December 14, 2017, 02:53:12 PM »
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454649/robert-mueller-team-investigate-the-investigators

People like Ryan and McConnell are simply silent...........

I don't think if Ryan quit after '18 we could do a much worse...........

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
File under "Insurance Policies"
« Reply #386 on: December 14, 2017, 03:55:48 PM »
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/372960.php

December 14, 2017
Early Drafts of Comey Exoneration Memo Said That Hillary Clinton's Secret Serve Was "Likely" Hacked and Accessed by Hostile Powers;
This Was of Course Omitted By the Time Comey Publicly Exonerated Her, Softened to "Possible"
Insurance policies.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, released copies Thursday of the edits to Comey's highly scrutinized statement.
One showed language was changed to describe the actions of Clinton and her colleagues as "extremely careless" as opposed to "grossly negligent." This is a key legal distinction.


Johnson, writing about his concerns in a letter Thursday to FBI Director Christopher Wray, said the original "could be read as a finding of criminality in Secretary Clinton’s handling of classified material."

"The edited statement deleted the reference to gross negligence – a legal threshold for mishandling classified material – and instead replaced it with an exculpatory sentence," he wrote.

The edits also showed that references to specific potential violations of statutes on "gross negligence" of classified information and "misdemeanor handling" were removed.
The original also said it was "reasonably likely" that "hostile actors" gained access to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email account. That was later changed to say that scenario was merely "possible."


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #390 on: December 17, 2017, 09:51:30 AM »
oh but FBI had no problem with Hillary and Huma removing many of their pre-chosen emails without a peep.

If this is not a witch hunt for ANYTHING to get an impeachment I don't know what is.

Just how delighted his team of Democrat lawyers must feel going after their hated target and - getting paid - all at the same time.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: the Atlantic: Putins' Game
« Reply #393 on: December 28, 2017, 06:22:51 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: The Russian conspiracy, Comey, related matters
« Reply #394 on: December 28, 2017, 10:41:15 AM »
I found it interesting too.

"The White House tasked the Treasury and State Departments with exploring new sanctions against Russia, as well as the publication of information about Putin’s personal wealth, but decided that such moves might backfire. If the White House pushed too hard, the Russians might dump even more stolen documents. Who knew what else they had?"

Ah, the true concern of the guilty , , ,




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Trump Lawyer demands Bannon cease and desist
« Reply #399 on: January 04, 2018, 06:57:00 AM »
WSJ
Trump Lawyer Demands Bannon ‘Cease and Desist’
President Trump and his onetime chief strategist Steve Bannon are feuding over revelations from a new book in which Mr. Bannon is quoted as saying that a 2016 meeting in Trump Tower between Donald Trump Jr. and some Russian representatives was "treasonous." WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains the implications of the rift. Photo: Getty
by Eli Stokols

WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump publicly repudiated Steve Bannon, his former senior strategist and onetime campaign chief, after a new book surfaced in which Mr. Bannon made scathing and highly personal criticisms of some of the president’s top advisers, including several family members.


“Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency,” Mr. Trump said in a statement released to reporters on Wednesday. “When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind.”

In the book, a copy of which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Bannon called a June 2016 meeting between top Trump campaign aides and a Russian lawyer “treasonous” and aired concerns that missteps by aides could lead to legal jeopardy for the president.

The meeting has become a focus of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Moscow’s meddling in the 2016 election and whether Trump campaign aides colluded with the Kremlin in the interference. Mr. Trump has said his campaign didn’t collude with Russia, and Moscow has denied meddling in the U.S. election.

The president’s statement was released after the publication of quotes and excerpts from “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” by Michael Wolff. In the book, Mr. Bannon sharply criticizes the president’s adult children and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, all of whom Mr. Bannon sparred with during his six months inside the administration.

Mr. Bannon is quoted as describing Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and a White House adviser, as “dumb as a brick.” A spokeswoman for Ms. Trump didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Bannon declined to comment. A person close to him said Mr. Bannon didn’t deny his quotes in the book.






President Trump's chief strategist Steve Bannon left his job at the White House on Aug. 18, marking another major administration shakeup. WSJ's Shelby Holliday looks at Bannon's turbulent year with President Trump. Photo: Getty
.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders called the book “trashy tabloid fiction” that was “filled with false and misleading accounts.”

Late Wednesday, an attorney for President Trump and his campaign sent a letter to Mr. Bannon demanding that he “cease and desist” making disparaging statements to the news media about Mr. Trump and his family.

The letter from attorney Charles Harder said that Mr. Bannon violated the terms of his employment agreement with the Trump campaign by making the comments.

In the five-page letter, Mr. Harder wrote that under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Bannon promised that while working for the campaign “and at all times thereafter” he would not “demean or disparage publicly” Mr. Trump and his family, among others.

The letter contends that Mr. Bannon disclosed “confidential information” to Mr. Wolff. In talking to Mr. Wolff, Mr. Bannon “in some cases” made “outright defamatory statements” about the president and his family, the letter alleged.

The letter called on Mr. Bannon to confirm within 24 hours that he will comply with the demands.

A publicist with Henry Holt, the imprint of Macmillan that is publishing the book, didn’t respond to a request for comment. Mr. Wolff didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.




Mr. Bannon resigned his post in August shortly after John Kelly was named White House chief of staff with a mandate to bring more discipline to the West Wing. Mr. Bannon since then has positioned himself as a torch bearer for Trumpism and a minter of conservative candidates heading into the 2018 midterm elections. He returned to the conservative website Breitbart website, where he is executive chairman.

Mr. Bannon supported Roy Moore in the Alabama Senate race, while Mr. Trump initially backed another Republican candidate, Luther Strange, in the party primary before ultimately backing Mr. Moore in the general election. Mr. Moore lost that race to Democrat Doug Jones, who was sworn in Wednesday. Mr. Moore had been dogged by allegations of sexual misconduct with teenagers when he was in his 30s, which he denied.

Mr. Trump has had public fallouts with various people, including lawmakers, in the past, some of which he has later patched up. A permanent rift between the president and Mr. Bannon could have political implications leading up to November’s midterm elections and into 2020. A battle for the president’s political base could divide the conservative movement, especially if Mr. Trump begins to align himself more with the GOP establishment, which views Mr. Bannon with the same level of enmity as he views it.

In his statement, Mr. Trump played down Mr. Bannon’s role in the Trump movement.

“Now that he is on his own, Steve is learning that winning isn’t as easy as I make it look,” the president’s statement said. “Steve had very little to do with our historic victory…. Yet Steve had everything to do with the loss of a Senate seat in Alabama held for more than thirty years by Republicans. Steve doesn’t represent my base—he’s only in it for himself.”



Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during a campaign event for Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore in December.
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during a campaign event for Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore in December.  Photo:  jonathan bachman/Reuters 
.
Mr. Trump also charged that Mr. Bannon, known for his so-called economic nationalist stances on trade and immigration, portrayed himself as more influential than he actually was. “Steve was rarely in a one-on-one meeting with me and only pretends to have had influence to fool a few people with no access and no clue, whom he helped write phony books,” Mr. Trump said.

At Wednesday’s media briefing, Ms. Sanders said the president was “furious” as he read excerpts from the book. She said Mr. Wolff, the author, visited the White House more than a dozen times last year and “95%” of the visits were to see Mr. Bannon. His only contact with Mr. Trump, she said, was a five-minute phone conversation. She said she believed Mr. Bannon and the president last spoke in early December 2017.

In the book, Mr. Bannon described the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between the president’s oldest son and top advisers and a Russian lawyer as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic.”


  .
Donald Trump Jr. has denied he did anything wrong in agreeing to the meeting, in which the campaign had been promised negative information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He said no useful information emerged from the meeting.

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted Wednesday: “Steve had the honor of working in the White House & serving the country. Unfortunately, he squandered that privilege & turned that opportunity into a nightmare of backstabbing, harassing, leaking, lying & undermining the President.”

In the book, Mr. Bannon sharply criticized Mr. Kushner and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, for taking part in the Russia meeting along with Donald Trump Jr.




“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic…and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately,” Mr. Bannon is quoted in the book as saying.

Further, Mr. Bannon predicted that the investigation by Mr. Mueller will focus on money laundering.

“This is all about money laundering,” Mr. Bannon told Mr. Wolff. The path to “Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr. and Jared Kushner,” he said. “It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”


A spokesman for Mr. Kushner didn’t respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for Mr. Manafort declined to comment.

Mr. Manafort pleaded not guilty in October to charges stemming from lobbying work he performed for the ruling party of Ukraine as well as attempts to allegedly hide the payments from that work. He filed a lawsuit Wednesday alleging that Mr. Mueller had exceeded his authority in indicting Mr. Manafort on the charges. A spokesman for Mr. Mueller declined to comment.

By Wednesday afternoon, Mr. Wolff’s book, available for preorder, was the No. 1 title on Amazon.com.

—Michael C. Bender contributed to this article