Author Topic: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell  (Read 66440 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: July 07, 2024, 06:03:33 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: January 18, 2025, 03:07:03 PM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3766
    • View Profile
Patel on Epstein’s Client List
« Reply #353 on: January 30, 2025, 03:34:40 PM »
Dear me, I expect this response moistened panties all ‘round DC:

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1885026004357316936

No doubt there are some federal police and intelligence senior players around town thinking to themselves “why would you rid yourself of a hole card used to control these movers and shakers by releasing it to the public?”

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
Re: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
« Reply #354 on: January 30, 2025, 05:27:17 PM »
To borrow Chuck Schumers word of the day, I am "aroused" at the thought of what will be unleashed if/when this transpires!!!

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3766
    • View Profile
Bondi Teasing Epstein List Release
« Reply #356 on: February 21, 2025, 02:42:37 PM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile
Re: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
« Reply #357 on: February 21, 2025, 02:44:34 PM »
for God's sake lets see it already   :-D

Hope they can scrub off Trump's name from the list  :wink:

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3766
    • View Profile
Re: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
« Reply #358 on: February 21, 2025, 05:08:03 PM »
for God's sake lets see it already   :-D

Hope they can scrub off Trump's name from the list  :wink:

If it can be shown he partook of underaged girls then he should resign.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile
docs released delayed = again
« Reply #360 on: February 27, 2025, 12:59:57 PM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14443051/jeffrey-epstein-files-release-fbi-trump-live-updates.html

 :roll:

what could be more suspicious than this?

watch, the only names we will see will be those we already know about , Clinton Prince Andrew and maybe one or two others

no other names to be released .


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
SDNY FBI hiding/hid Epstein documents
« Reply #361 on: February 27, 2025, 04:28:59 PM »
Just Facts
1h  ·
An informant has told Attorney General Pam Bondi that FBI officials in New York have failed to disclose “thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation” of Jeffrey Epstein, despite orders to release them.
Here are disturbing facts about what FBI officials in NY did in this case:
Two days after Epstein’s arrest in 2019, the Department of Justice sent a letter to a judge arguing that he should be denied bail. The letter, co-signed by Maurene Comey (daughter of Jim Comey), reveals that a search of Epstein’s New York residence on the night of his arrest found:
• “an extraordinary volume of photographs of nude and partially-nude young women or girls.”
• “compact discs” in “a locked safe” with “hand-written labels” like “Girl pics nude” and “Young [Name] + [Name].”
Maria Farmer, a victim of Epstein who reported him to the FBI in 1996, told CBS News that Epstein’s mansion in New York was loaded with hidden cameras. Describing a surveillance room with a large number of monitors, she said, “I looked on the cameras, and I saw toilet, toilet, bed, bed, toilet, bed.” She also said the house was “videoed, all the time,” and when she asked Epstein “What do you do with this?” he replied, “I keep it. I keep everything in my safe.”
Incredibly, after the feds cut open Epstein’s safe, they abandoned its contents and left the home unguarded. When they came back four days later, the contents of the safe were gone. These facts only came to light in 2021 during the sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, not because the Department of Justice disclosed them to the public.
The official transcript of the sixth day of the trial—obtained exclusively by Just Facts—shows that the search team leader of Epstein’s home, FBI Special Agent Kelly Maguire, testified under oath to the following:
• The FBI executed a search warrant of Epstein’s mansion on the day of his arrest (July 6, 2019), but the warrant limited what could be searched and seized, so the agents obtained a broader warrant on July 7, which they executed that day.
• Under those two warrants, agents located Epstein’s safe, cut it open, and found in it “binders that contained CDs,” “external hard drives,” “jewelry,” “loose diamonds,” and “large amounts of U.S. currency and passports.”
• Instead of seizing all of this evidence, the FBI agents placed it on the top and side of the safe, took a picture of it, and left it completely unguarded.
• The alleged reason why they didn’t seize the contents of the safe is that they didn’t “have legal authority to seize all of the CDs that day”—even though they had already obtained a second broader warrant.
• Evidencing that the warrant didn’t exclude all CDs, Maguire was asked, “Now, at the time you observed these CDs on the safe, did you have legal authority to seize all of the CDs that day?” and she replied, “No, not all of them.”
• When Maguire returned to Epstein’s house on July 11 with a search warrant that gave her “legal authority” to seize what they left behind, she “observed that all of the items” shown in the “photograph that I had previously seen were missing.”
• Maguire then had a 3-way phone call with an “associate of Mr. Epstein named Richard Kahn and his legal counsel named Andrew Tomback.”
• Within 30 minutes of “that telephone conversation, Richard Kahn came to the residence of Jeffrey Epstein” and “brought all of those items” back to Maguire “in two suitcases.”
• Maguire said that the contents of the suitcases “appeared to be all of the items that had been previously located in the safe,” but she “didn’t look at what was on any of these CDs” before Epstein’s associates took them.
Just Facts shared the facts above with a veteran police detective and asked for his thoughts. The detective, who has been involved in the execution of more 100 search warrants, replied:
• “This is unprecedented in my experience and violates basic protocols.”
• “There is no apparent reason why a warrant in a child sex trafficking case would prohibit a search team from seizing items from a safe, especially CDs labeled with the names of potential victims.”
• “Even if the warrant was so oddly restrictive, law enforcement has a duty to guard the evidence until another warrant is obtained to seize it.
• “FBI agents, who are highly trained and heavily resourced to handle such matters, undoubtedly know that you don’t abandon evidence.”
Adding to the stench of a cover up, the person who took the contents of the safe (Richard Kahn) is not merely an “associate” of Epstein but is heavily implicated in his crimes. A 2021 civil complaint filed by the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands states that Kahn and another person named Darren Indyke:
• were “the indispensable captains of Epstein’s criminal enterprise, roles for which they were richly rewarded.”
• “organized, controlled, and directed almost every aspect” of Epstein’s dealings.
• were “officers in virtually every corporate entity that Epstein created to fund and conceal his activities.”
• “directed, approved, enabled, and justified millions of dollars in payments that fueled the Epstein Enterprise’s sex trafficking.”
• helped create “a steady supply of vulnerable female children”—including “numerous girls between the age of 12 and 17 years old”—who were placed “into sexual servitude in service of Epstein’s desires, and those of his associates.”
• are the co-executors of Epstein’s estate and continue to “engage in a course of conduct aimed at concealing the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise.”
• have “approved the release” of funds from Epstein’s estate to “pay for the legal fees and costs of persons” who allegedly “participated in the criminal activity of the Epstein Enterprise.”
To this day, the federal government hasn’t revealed the names of the people that were written beside the “young” females on the CDs in Epstein’s safe. Again, this is where Epstein kept the footage from his hidden cameras, according to Maria Farmer.
The FBI is also keeping other information under wraps. After Epstein died, Farmer told CBS News that the FBI “failed” her by not acting on the complaint she filed in 1996 and added, “They are trying to pretend I do not exist. I want my report and I want it printed out so I can show everyone how much they failed. I don’t know if I’ll ever get it. We’ve been requesting it forever.”
Bondi’s Letter
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1895195194947183047
Hyperlinks to the primary sources of all the facts above are available at https://www.justfactsdaily.com/federal-report-on-the...

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile
Fall back ? position on the Espstein docs
« Reply #363 on: March 06, 2025, 08:43:43 AM »
So now it is out there that the docs are tampered and we cannot believe what they reveal as being truthful or not.

For all I know that supposition is a scam .   So some hotshot whose name is on the "list" can say the list is a fraud and simply deny any allegations

Amazing the cabal of lying deep state, wealthy connected  bastards can truly get away with anything.




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
Veracity Unknown
« Reply #364 on: March 08, 2025, 03:34:14 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile
Re: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
« Reply #366 on: March 12, 2025, 03:45:10 PM »
I am going to guess - 

this is related to why Bondi will not release files

the CIA was using Epstein to spy and get dirt on important people.
Including cameras 

or Trump was there.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
Re: Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
« Reply #367 on: March 12, 2025, 04:51:32 PM »
I'm doubting Trump was there.

A) the date of his break with Epstein is well known.  His flights with Epstein were prior to that and were to NY, not "The Island".

B) He would have nipped this in the bud much before it got to this point.

Keeping leverage over the various players is sufficient to meet the criteria of Occam's Razor.