Author Topic: The Judiciary  (Read 2525 times)


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74788
    • View Profile


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3870
    • View Profile
Judges and Selective Prosecution
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2024, 09:50:41 AM »
Good overview with several links therein castigating selective prosecution and the judicial behavior that undergirds it:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/03/mendacity_and_corruption_in_the_judiciary.html

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74788
    • View Profile
WSJ approves Trump's 6th circuit nominee-- Hermandorfer
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2025, 05:19:47 PM »
There’s been chatter in MAGA circles that President Trump’s second-term judicial nominees should be ideologues willing to deliver political results, not Federalist Society types who follow the law. Mr. Trump has ignored this unproductive noise in making his first pick. Late Thursday he said he’d chosen Whitney Hermandorfer for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Ms. Hermandorfer is the director of strategic litigation for Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti, who has a case at the Supreme Court this term (U.S. v. Skrmetti) defending his state’s ban on giving gender-transition hormones to minors. Mr. Skrmetti praised the nomination on Friday, saying Ms. Hermandorfer is “an absolute rock star,” “a lawyer’s lawyer,” and “perhaps the single most credentialed lawyer in America, having clerked for a full third of the justices on the Supreme Court.”

That isn’t a typo. Ms. Hermandorfer clerked for now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was on the D.C. Circuit, then Justice Samuel Alito, then Justice Amy Coney Barrett. She has also worked at Williams & Connolly, an elite Washington shop that recently made news by stepping up to represent and defend the law firm Perkins Coie from Mr. Trump’s executive order targeting its business and staff. The other important point is that her credentials are conventionally conservative, and Mr. Trump is praising Ms. Hermandorfer in those terms.

“She has a long history of working for Judges and Justices who respect the RULE OF LAW, and protect our Constitution,” Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Whitney is a Fighter who will inspire confidence in our Legal System.” It’s encouraging to see the President stick with this approach to selecting judges. One of the best legacies of Mr. Trump’s first term was a judiciary stocked with conservative constitutionalists.

Ms. Hermandorfer sounds like another hit from the same genre, which is a good sign for the roughly 60 other federal judicial vacancies that await Mr. Trump’s nominations.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20334
    • View Profile
(None Dare Call It) Treason of the Judiciary
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2025, 06:07:22 AM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/05/05/none_dare_call_it_treason_of_the_judiciary__152746.html

In one day April 24, 2025:


– A federal district court judge in California blocked Trump’s executive order that would have denied federal funds to so-called sanctuary cities that limit or forbid cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

– A Washington, D.C., judge blocked the Trump administration from following through on the president’s executive order requiring that voters in federal elections show proof of citizenship when registering.

– A district judge in New Hampshire blocked efforts to defund public schools that utilize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Not to be outdone, judges in Maryland and Washington, D.C., essentially issued the same order, giving added protection to one of the least popular programs ever shoved down the throat of American citizens.

At the time, those were the latest of more than a dozen nationwide injunctions issued by unelected federal judges who appeared more interested in preserving and protecting left-wing shibboleths than the Constitution.

Also in courts across the nation that week were attempts by judges to reject Trump’s authority as commander in chief to ban transgender participation in the military, to deny Trump the right to strip security clearances from law firms that he says put national security interests second to political partisanship, and stop the administration’s efforts to eliminate federal news services such as Voice of America that engage in anti-American propaganda.

Those are all in addition to the several injunctions issued relative to Trump’s promised reform of the immigration system to expedite deportation of illegal immigrants, especially those who have a criminal history or are members of international gangs.

If that seems normal, it isn’t. There were only six nationwide injunctions during the eight years of the George W. Bush presidency, and only 12 during the Obama presidency. That increased to 14 under President Biden, which was surpassed by President Trump in the first nine weeks of his second term when 15 such injunctions were issued. Of course, Trump should be accustomed to such judicial abuse. In his first term, there were 64 injunctions against his policies, a staggering 92.2% issued by Democrat-appointed judges. Julien Benda would have clearly recognized the “political passions” that had supplanted the disinterested intellectual rigor we once expected of our judges.

Yet because of our habituated respect for the separation of powers, none dare call it the treason of the judiciary.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20535
    • View Profile
Sotomayor joins the lawfare outright
« Reply #6 on: Today at 06:56:02 AM »
https://archive.is/PFqvV

Funny how she is speaking to the ABA.  The State Bars never seem to hold their own lib lawyers to account though Clinton was disbarred. Off the top of my head I can't think of any other crat lawyers being held to account for gaming the legal system to the level of fraud.