Author Topic: Panama  (Read 2504 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: November 09, 2023, 07:04:49 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: Panama
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2023, 04:46:36 AM »

Important charts and maps not surviving the posting here:

===================================

November 10, 2023
View On Website
Open as PDF

    
Panama’s Post-Canal Economy Takes Shape
The country is looking for solutions beyond its traditional economic engine.
By: Allison Fedirka

Throughout 2023, the Panama Canal Authority has introduced various restrictions on the size and frequency of vessels transiting the canal amid an extended period of low water levels. Just last week, authorities reduced the daily number of available bookings for passage from 31 to 25. These conditions highlight the fundamental need for Panama to diversify its economy beyond the canal and related services. The transition already appears to be underway.

The Panama Canal serves as the main transit point between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, facilitating trade between the U.S. and Asia and connecting markets in Latin America, Europe and Canada. Approximately 5-6 percent of all seaborne trade passes through the canal. However, the global economy is undergoing a reorganization, part of which is reflected in changing trade patterns, which will have deep implications for Panama’s economy. Since the easing of the COVID-19 pandemic, global trade has rebounded slowly, with the volume of total trade growing annually by just 2.4 percent last year and an expected 1.7 percent this year. Meanwhile, due to a number of crises around the world, some of the trade that was previously conducted through the Panama Canal has been diverted to other routes. For example, U.S. fuel and gas supplies that were previously destined for Asian markets are now being sold to European customers, meaning these suppliers no longer need passage through the canal to get their goods to market.

Panama Canal | Shipping Volume by Country
(click to enlarge)

For Panama, this is an existential issue given the canal’s critical role in the country’s economy. According to the U.S. International Trade Administration, 80 percent of Panama’s gross domestic product is accumulated through the services sector – the largest contributor to which is the canal. Even other contributors like banking, logistics, activities in the Colon Free Trade Zone, insurance, container ports and flagship registry revolve around canal operations.

However, this arrangement is problematic not just because of the lack of economic diversification but also because it leaves Panama’s economy at the mercy of two factors out of the country’s control: global trade and water levels at the canal. Regarding trade, the shipping industry has been affected by a number of recent challenges, including container ship overcapacity, military conflicts (especially in the Middle East) and new environmental regulations. Maersk, the world’s second largest ocean carrier, announced on Nov. 3 that it will cut 3,500 jobs over the next few months on top of the 6,500 positions it eliminated earlier this year. The company said the move is pre-emptive and part of a strategy to weather challenging prospects the industry is anticipating for 2024.

In addition, declining water levels have forced canal authorities to repeatedly adjust operations. A severe drought in Panama, exacerbated by the El Nino effect, has resulted in an 80 percent decline in rainfall in the basins that feed into the canal. That authorities have already said they will limit passage to 18 vessels a day starting in February 2024 indicates that they don’t see the situation improving any time soon. The restrictions in crossings will result in rising toll prices and longer wait times, which will in turn increase transport costs for exporters and the price of goods for consumers. It was recently reported that two liquefied petroleum gas carriers turned around within 10 miles of the canal and sailed away, presumably due to high fees and delays. It's not unreasonable to believe that more companies will eventually seek alternate routes to protect their bottom lines.

Global Trade and GDP Growth
(click to enlarge)Global Trade Volume Projections
(click to enlarge)

The Panamanian government has over the years adopted measures it believed would guarantee that the canal could adapt to changes in global shipping. The country had gradually structured its banking sector in such a way to attract international business, which helped it generate profits through its canal operations. And in 2016, Panama completed a major expansion project that allowed the canal to accommodate larger shipping vessels and remain a major transit route for international companies. But the recent changes in shipping patterns and environmental conditions have added urgency to the government’s efforts. In recent months, talks have accelerated on building a dry canal, something the country has considered for years. In October, the Panama Maritime Chamber called on the government to expedite the project, especially as Mexico and Colombia are considering construction of alternate transport routes. The government is also developing other areas of the economy unrelated to the canal through its Sexta Frontera initiative.

The most recent and potentially impactful move, however, has been its bid to get Panama off the Financial Action Task Force’s gray list of countries that require increased monitoring for failing to impose measures to combat money laundering and terrorism financing. Panama was on the gray list from 2014 to 2016 due to its banking sector’s lack of compliance with FATF standards and over concerns that the country was acting as a tax haven. It was relisted in 2019 but removed just last month.

The FATF is essentially a tool for likeminded countries to publicly shame governments that don’t comply with its expectations but has no authority to directly enforce its standards. Instead, countries are encouraged to adopt certain practices in order to avoid ending up on the watchdog’s gray and black lists. The organization has the sole power to add or remove countries from its lists and monitors progress on adoption and implementation of international rules for fighting money laundering. Many economists and financial institutions have tried to quantify the effects of FAFT listings on a country’s economy. A working paper by the International Monetary Fund concluded that countries on the gray list saw capital inflow declines of 7.6 percent of GDP on average, while foreign direct investment inflows decreased by an estimated 3 percent of GDP.

Appearing on an FATF list is a barrier to international business in a number of ways. Companies doing business with listed countries may need to perform extra due diligence to ensure all transactions are aboveboard, which could involve additional costs. It could also reduce a government’s access to capital and lead to lost business opportunities and reduced investor confidence. Thus, Panama’s removal from the list will aid its efforts to attract more investors and diversify its economy.

Even despite the FATF designation, the country’s economy performed remarkably well over the past decade. From 2014 to 2019, Panama’s GDP grew at an average rate of 4.7 percent, well above the regional average of 1.1 percent. Over this same period, Panama’s net FDI inflows were between $4 billion and $5.25 billion annually, according to the World Bank, the highest levels since 1977, when the bank began releasing the figures. Obviously, the country’s GDP and FDI took a hit in 2020 because of the pandemic, but both have since rebounded strongly.

Panama | GDP Growth
(click to enlarge)
Panama | FDI and GDP
(click to enlarge)

Diversifying a national economy is easier said than done. There are several factors working in Panama’s favor, most notably the country’s financial system. Panama has fully institutionalized dollarization, and there are no exchange controls or restrictions on the movement of capital. Credit from established lenders is readily accessible, and the country boasts an active and modern capital market. But Panama also has a number of economic challenges to overcome, including social obstacles to diversification. Some segments of the population may be resistant to new types of economic activity – signs of which were on full display during recent protests over foreign-run mining operations. In addition, investments are unevenly distributed throughout the country, with large disparities between indigenous communities and urban dwellers. While solutions to these problems remain elusive, one thing is clear: Panama’s ability to maximize its global position will depend as much on its ability to manage the canal as on its efforts to diversify and integrate the national economy.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
MY
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2024, 04:26:40 PM »
Second

Obviously this is a matter of Homeland Security, and to put it in Latin America would lead it to being hard to find down the road, so I am thinking Panama deserves its own thread, not only for Homeland issues, but to dial in on Chinese footprint, and establishing trail for its flood of fifth column agents.

==============

https://michaelyon.locals.com/upost/5287591/share-everywhere

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20075
    • View Profile
Re: Panama
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2024, 05:31:13 AM »
Borrowing the concept "Montezuma's revenge" we can label the Dorian gap as "Noriega's revenge":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: Panama
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2024, 12:45:24 PM »
Darien Gap IIRC , , ,

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: March 11, 2024, 11:37:32 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
GPF: Panama Canal
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2024, 05:43:52 AM »
December 23, 2024
View On Website
Open as PDF

The Panama Canal: Hostage to the US-China Trade War?
Ultimately, it’s highly unlikely Washington will take control of this mutually beneficial waterway.
By: Allison Fedirka

In November 1906, Theodore Roosevelt became the first sitting U.S. president to make a diplomatic visit outside the continental United States, sailing to Panama to view the construction of the Panama Canal. In September 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed a treaty that would ultimately give Panama full control and operation over the canal in 2000. And in December 2025, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump threatened to retake the canal from Panama. The chances of this happening are slim, of course. But like most political rhetoric, his comments denote larger goals and aspirations – in this case, Trump’s domestic agenda, which likely includes a trade war with China. The U.S.-Panama relationship is merely a hostage to that agenda.

Control over the Panama Canal gave Washington a valuable source of revenue and immense geopolitical influence. Since the 1500s, explorers and entrepreneurs had dreamed of a path that would drastically cut the time and resources required to cross from one ocean to the other: Sea transit between the U.S. east and west coasts was a weekslong, 13,000-mile journey. Alfred Thayer Mahan, the naval and geopolitical writer, knew that U.S. control of the Central American isthmus, and the possibility of a trans-isthmus canal, would be pivotal for the projection of U.S. military and commercial power. Presidents Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt, both former military officers, were keenly aware of the isthmus’s strategic value. Grant commissioned a series of expedition surveys to identify possible locations and assess construction feasibility. Roosevelt later oversaw the creation of the U.S. Great White Fleet and canal construction.

The relationship between the U.S. and Panama is more nuanced. When conflict levels are low, the countries’ geopolitical interests align nicely. Washington ultimately wants the secure passage of goods and, relatedly, the prevention of any military not native to the Western Hemisphere from gaining influence in Panama. For its part, Panama needs to control the territory within its modern borders, and it needs the revenue generated from the canal’s strategic position inside them.

In times of conflict, however, they don’t always see eye to eye. The U.S. gained a foothold in Panama only because it was fighting for independence from Colombia. Gran Colombia had already broken down into what we now call Venezuela, Ecuador and Colombia, so Panama thought the time was right for its own secession. Colombia had the far superior military, but to send its soldiers to Panama by land was to send them through the Darien Gap, a wildly impassable area where they shared a border. Colombia was thus forced to transport its soldiers by sea to retake Panama. Seeing the opportunity this presented, the U.S. deployed its own military to deny them passage. Panama was able to separate from Colombia, and the U.S. was able to establish itself as its security guarantor, giving it a leg to assume control of the Panama Canal’s construction if the opportunity arose – which it did when the French company working on it filed for bankruptcy.

The U.S. and Panama enjoyed a mostly harmonious relationship thereafter until the final years of the Cold War. Panama sided with the U.S. in that conflict, working alongside Washington to fight the Sandinistas and secure Western influence in Central America. But ties began to fray under the rule of authoritarian ruler Manuel Noriega, whose administration was marred by political instability and repeated coup attempts (likely with U.S. backing). Washington sent its military to remove him from power, and though it hurt the bilateral relationship (the Panamanian military was dismantled), subsequent administrations repaired the damage, and the treaty signed by Carter remained intact.

The anticipated U.S.-China trade war will test U.S.-Panamanian relations once again. Trump’s comments on social media about the canal all but mention China by name, saying the canal cannot fall into “the wrong hands.” He also criticized what he described as ridiculously high transit fees. This may prove even more difficult to “fix.” The U.S. is by far the largest user and beneficiary of canal traffic. It remains the primary means of shipping goods between the U.S. East Coast and Asian markets, including China. Putting tariffs on goods from China will increase the cost of goods for U.S. consumers. One way to try to offset some of those costs would be reducing other input costs, such as transportation fees.

Fees for transiting the canal follow a complex system with many variables. Transit rates are set by the Panama Canal Authority, which operates closely, though independently, with the government. Every ship that passes through the canal faces a series of mandatory and variable charges. Mandatory charges include things like the tugboat and pilot fees needed for navigating the canal’s many locks. By law, highly experienced and trained Panamanian pilots must command and control all vessels passing through the canal (the vessel’s pilot relinquishes all control to the Panamanian pilot upon arrival at the canal). The variable fees relate to things like a vessel's length, weight and scheduling. The fees are equally applied to ships regardless of country of origin or destination. (This reflects the “neutrality” concept enshrined in the treaty.)

There are other, strategic reasons Washington would want to avoid antagonizing Panama. Panama serves as a major transit country for migrants leaving South America for the United States. Washington and Panama City have increased coordination on this front, with the U.S. even paying for select deportations of migrants out of Panama to their countries of origin. Panama has also used its control of the canal to indirectly support U.S. sanctions against Iran and Russia by withdrawing flags from vessels linked to sanctioned companies and entities. Elsewhere, Panama’s efforts to develop more reservoirs and build a dry canal to help mitigate the impact droughts have had on canal traffic will ultimately benefit the U.S. But most important, Panama remains the most attractive partner for the U.S.; similar ideas floated for Mexico, Nicaragua and Colombia all lacks the benefits of the canal in Panama, which has the obvious benefit of already being built.

The conflict the U.S.-China trade war will generate will likely force Washington and Panama City to re-examine their relationship. The U.S. has plenty of leverage, including the world’s largest and most advanced military, but Washington is unlikely to be willing to absorb the political and economic costs and international backlash that would come from moving against Panama too aggressively. There’s room in the relationship for adjustment, but cooperation is still in both countries’ best interests.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
WSJ:
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2024, 05:08:43 PM »

After making a number of fair points, not until the end does the WSJ begin to engage with the true question.

"We doubt Mr. Trump knows much of this, and he’s famous for popping off to grab attention and hit a nationalist theme. Perhaps he’s concerned about China’s spreading influence in Latin America, which is real and isn’t in the U.S. interest. Two of the canal’s five cargo ports are run as a concession by Hutchison Whampoa, a publicly traded firm on the Hong Kong stock exchange, while three others are run by U.S., Singapore and Taiwanese commercial interests."

To be added to this is how the Panamanians have enabled the Chinese to smuggle 75,000 MAMs into America.

===================
Will Trump Invade Panama?
The President-elect threatens to retake the canal, but how?
By The Editorial Board
Dec. 24, 2024 5:01 pm ET

Forgive us if we missed it, but we don’t recall Donald Trump campaigning to invade Panama and retake its famous canal. But there was the President-elect on the weekend, threatening our Central American ally with punishment if it doesn’t meet his demands.

Opinion: Potomac Watch
WSJ Opinion Potomac Watch
GOP Lessons From the Christmas Shutdown Brinkmanship


Subscribe
Add to Queue
Explore Audio Center
“Our Navy and commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, highly unfair, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama—I say, very foolishly, by the United States,” Mr. Trump told a crowd in Phoenix. “This complete ripoff of our country will immediately stop.”

He added: “We will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to the United States of America in full, quickly and without question. I’m not going to stand for it. So to the officials of Panama, please be guided accordingly.”

***
Where did that come from? Did some shipping magnate whisper in Mr. Trump’s ear? Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino quickly rebutted Mr. Trump and said Panama will defend its interests. Mr. Trump replied on Truth Social, “We’ll see about that.”

So what is Mr. Trump proposing to do—invade? Make the Americas in the image of William McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt again?

If we can introduce a few facts, Mr. Trump’s claim that Panama is gouging Americans is unfounded. Every vessel, regardless of its flag, pays the same rate according to tonnage and type. Container ships, which carry finished goods, pay more than bulk carriers. About 75% of the total price is a toll and 25% is for services like tugboat or locomotive escorts.

When the U.S. ceded the canal to Panama in 1999 under a treaty negotiated in the 1970s by Jimmy Carter, there was concern that the country couldn’t run the vital transit way. But the Panama Canal Authority has done well by guarding its institutional independence from the government and running as a business.

The canal’s budget is reviewed by its board of directors, the president’s cabinet and Panama’s congress, and excess earnings are transferred to government coffers. But the canal authority is financially and managerially independent of the state. A third set of locks, which opened in 2016, was planned and built by the canal authority, not Panama.

Lake Gatun is crucial to the canal operation, but it also supplies 60% of the country’s potable water, which takes priority over shippers. When an El Nino drought that started in June 2023 and lasted a year lowered the draft on the lake, the canal authority had to reduce sharply the number of daily transits. Jorge Quijano, a former Panama Canal administrator, told us that he estimates that the loss of revenue to the canal authority was about $1 billion.

To remain competitive and help customers get their products to market, the authority adopted an online auction for express passes. Those willing to pay more got through the shipping lanes faster. Others either had to wait or use alternate routes around the Cape of Good Hope or through the Suez Canal. If Mr. Trump wants to put pressure on Panama prices, he should demand that the Houthis stop firing missiles at commercial ships in the Red Sea.

When the canal was in U.S. hands, it adjusted tolls to break even. But today the Panama Canal Authority can’t depend on the U.S. government for maintenance or capital expenditures.

Mr. Quijano says that building the one or two more reservoirs needed to mitigate water uncertainty could cost more than $2 billion. The authority has to think about its bottom line so it charges for the market value of the canal, measuring size, weight and demand. It holds a public hearing on toll increases, and in the past it has adjusted fees based on feedback.

We doubt Mr. Trump knows much of this, and he’s famous for popping off to grab attention and hit a nationalist theme. Perhaps he’s concerned about China’s spreading influence in Latin America, which is real and isn’t in the U.S. interest. Two of the canal’s five cargo ports are run as a concession by Hutchison Whampoa, a publicly traded firm on the Hong Kong stock exchange, while three others are run by U.S., Singapore and Taiwanese commercial interests.

It’s hard to know how seriously to take Mr. Trump’s broadsides. But threatening a takeover that would require an invasion may court more trouble than he imagines.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
FO:
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2024, 01:24:36 PM »


(1) TRUMP LATAM ENVOY SAYS PANAMA THREAT TO COUNTER CHINA: Special Envoy for Latin America nominee Mauricio Claver-Carone said President-elect Donald Trump’s threat to seize the Panama Canal was designed to make clear that “decades of U.S. commerce financing China’s growth and strategic footprint in the Americas is over.”

Why It Matters: Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson gave a speech in 2017 declaring that the then-Trump administration was returning to the Monroe Doctrine, an early 19th century policy of excluding European powers from the Western hemisphere. Monroe 2.0 is directed towards China, which is engaged in an influence projection strategy in Latin America in order to contain the United States. As it stands, Panama has given contracts to a Hong Kong-based Chinese company to control ports at both ends of the Panama Canal, and there are fears that China could wield undue influence against transiting American ships there. About three-quarters of the canal’s traffic is coming to or going from the United States, while China is the canal’s second-largest customer. Panama is set to raise fees starting on 01 January 2025. – M.S.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3484
    • View Profile
Federal Marine Commission Chair on Panama Canal
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2025, 02:00:52 PM »
@BehizyTweets
·
1h
BREAKING: The Chairman of the Federal Maritime Commission just confirmed all of President Trump's allegations against Panama for violating the Canal Treaty.

He broke down how China now controls it and why it's vital that the United States intervenes before it's too late.

(BBG here) The statement referred to can be found here: https://www.fmc.gov/ftdo/statement-of-chairman-louis-e-sola-to-the-senate-committee-on-commerce-science-and-transportation-fees-and-foreign-influence-examining-the-panama-canal-and-its-impact-on-u-s-trade-and-n/

Question: should we be pining for Noriega given these concerns?
« Last Edit: January 28, 2025, 02:02:38 PM by Body-by-Guinness »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
FO: No bid Chinese contracts being audited
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2025, 08:26:48 AM »


(3) PANAMA LAUNCHES AUDIT INTO CHINESE NO-BID CONTRACTS: During a Senate hearing on the Panama Canal yesterday, Federal Maritime Commissioner Daniel Maffei said the Panamanian government launched an audit into Chinese port and infrastructure deals, shortly after President Donald Trump took office.

Professor Eugene Kontorovich said the previous Panamanian administration awarded no-bid 25 year contracts to Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports, which could be directed by the Chinese government to disrupt U.S. access to the Panama Canal.
Why It Matters: China restricting access to the Panama Canal would disrupt U.S. supply chains and trade, and Chinese controlled ports could be used to conduct cyberattacks using Huawei telecoms infrastructure installed around the canal. During the hearing Kontorovich pointed out that the neutrality treaty would allow the U.S. to take preemptive military action in the face of a credible threat, which would give the Trump administration the option to intervene militarily in Panama. The Panamanian government launching an audit into Chinese port contracts immediately after Trump’s inauguration, is likely the result of Trump’s pressure campaign on the Panamanian government. - R.C.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3484
    • View Profile
Panama Not Renewing China Initiative, Explores Voiding Other Agreements
« Reply #17 on: February 02, 2025, 06:32:31 PM »
@Osint613
·
2h
Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino announced that after meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Panama will not renew its 2017 Belt and Road Initiative agreement with China and aims to void existing deals before their 2027-2028 end dates.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3484
    • View Profile
Re: Panama Not Renewing China Initiative, Explores Voiding Other Agreements
« Reply #18 on: February 02, 2025, 06:48:50 PM »
@Osint613
·
2h
Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino announced that after meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Panama will not renew its 2017 Belt and Road Initiative agreement with China and aims to void existing deals before their 2027-2028 end dates.

ETA: more here:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/02/panama-backs-out-of-chinas-silk-road-agreement/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73373
    • View Profile
Re: Panama
« Reply #19 on: February 03, 2025, 06:12:08 AM »
So much winning!!!