Author Topic: FBI, DOJ, SS Follies, Entrapment Attempts, & Stasi-Like Schemes (CIA & ATF, too)  (Read 16285 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
The Civil Forfeiture laws are a great blight upon the C'l Rule of Law of America!!!

Thank you for this article.   I am forwarding it to a very good friend who until a couple of years ago was high up in the DEA.  He is a good and honorable man, and we have had genuine conversation on this subject over several years.   I have him on his heels and this will add to my momentum.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile
The Civil Forfeiture laws are a great blight upon the C'l Rule of Law of America!!!

Thank you for this article.   I am forwarding it to a very good friend who until a couple of years ago was high up in the DEA.  He is a good and honorable man, and we have had genuine conversation on this subject over several years.   I have him on his heels and this will add to my momentum.
:-D

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile


https://ace.mu.nu/archives/412297.php

The thought of all those venal, partisan bastards competing with each other for landing spots in think tanks and lobbying firms around town, reducing compensation packages via a glutted market, and likely thrusting subtle daggers into each other’s back as they jostle warms my heart.

Hopefully a huge wave of well timed security clearance revocations are also planned, and will be issued once these weasels have landed a job requiring a clearance….

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
WT: FBI frazzled
« Reply #104 on: November 12, 2024, 06:00:10 AM »
Trump election sends ‘stunned’ FBI brass to exit

Former investigators, senior executives see writing on wall

By Kerry Picket THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The brass on the seventh floor at FBI headquarters in Washington have been in a daze and wary of a housecleaning since Donald Trump was reelected president on Tuesday, inside sources say.

The Washington Times learned through several anonymous bureau sources that senior agency executives were “stunned” and “shell-shocked” by Mr. Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris.

“You know the fit test? How they let the standards slack on the fit test?” said the first FBI source, referring to the agency’s physical fitness requirements. “Everyone’s going to have a real problem when they’re running for the door.”

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray and Deputy Director Paul Abbate have little chance of remaining at the bureau by the time Mr. Trump is inaugurated, sources say.

FBI employees recall Mr. Trump firing Director James B. Comey five months after taking the oath of office in 2017.

“It’s a countdown for Wray because [people here] don’t think he will stay to get fired after what Trump did to Comey,” the first

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray may be stepping down before Inauguration Day in January.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

source said. “Trump will say, ‘Yeah, fire his a--. Don’t let him take the plane home.’” Mr. Comey learned about his termination while flying to California on the bureau’s airplane.

Mr. Trump appointed Mr. Wray as FBI director in 2017 after firing Mr. Comey. The director’s term is 10 years, depending on the president’s confidence.

Sources say others on the seventh floor of the FBI are so concerned about their jobs that they are likely to flood Washington’s private security job market.

Most of the sources said no one’s job in the FBI at a GS-14 level or higher is safe, and they fully expect Mr. Trump to “smash the place to pieces when he gets in” and that it will be a “bloodbath.”

Former FBI whistleblower George Hill told The Washington Times that people in the agency say the state of the FBI is “frazzled.”

“I have friends still at the bureau telling me that no less than 50 senior executives (SES) are scrambling to retire ASAP,” he said.

The Times reached out to the FBI for comment.

The FBI and Mr. Trump have had a tense history since the 2016 presidential campaign. Under Mr. Comey, the agency launched its Crossfire Hurricane investigation of the Trump campaign’s alleged links to Russia in July 2016.

Mr. Trump’s firing of Mr. Comey in 2017 raised suspicions in the Justice Department that the president was obstructing justice, leading to special counsel Robert Mueller’s long-running and costly investigation. Mr. Mueller ultimately found no evidence that Trump campaign officials conspired with or were connected to Moscow.

A subsequent government watchdog investigation found that FBI officials made numerous errors or omissions in secret warrant applications for surveillance of a Trump campaign aide.

More recently, The Times exclusively reported about an FBI whistleblower’s protected disclosure to Congress that Mr. Comey launched an off-the-books undercover criminal investigation against Mr. Trump in June 2015. The operation was not predicated on any particular case and was not connected to Russia.

Mr. Trump also clashed with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired in 2018 hours before his retirement. Mr. McCabe became a cable news analyst who was highly critical of Mr. Trump.

In August 2022, the FBI executed a search warrant at Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort home in Florida and seized documents. Subsequent criminal charges accused him of mishandling classified materials. That prosecution is now in jeopardy because of Mr. Trump’s reelection.

Many at the FBI remembered when Border Patrol Chief Mark Morgan, a longtime FBI official, resigned six months into 2017 after Mr. Trump took office. Mr. Trump later hired him to head Immigration Customs and Enforcement.

Many on the seventh floor of the FBI are also concerned about billionaire technology executive Elon Musk, owner of X and Tesla, joining the Trump administration as head of a government efficiency commission.

“When he tries to do efficiency at headquarters, the place is going to have five people … if he’s talking about a lot of dead weight,” a second FBI source said.

“Try to find a person that’s actually working,” the source said. “That may be the biggest problem there — that there’s no efficiency. So that’s actually the bigger threat. If you’re going to try to make the government efficient, you would start with the FBI because if you do politics all the time, you’re probably bloated.”

FBI agents spent much of their time during the Biden administration seeking out, investigating and arresting Jan. 6 defendants. Mr. Trump has pledged to pardon them at the beginning of his second term.

A third FBI source said some bureau personnel tired of the Jan. 6 investigations are amused “at the fact that Trump [likely] pardons everybody involved in Jan. 6.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile
Oh Noes, All Those Poor DOJ Staff Landing Hard on Americans are Worried!
« Reply #105 on: November 12, 2024, 03:25:24 PM »
Don't you be eating anything while reading this lest you aspirate when running your eyes across concern about and "independent DOJ" losing that status under Trump. Yeah, right, independent under Garland. Gawd:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/11/politics/attorney-general-donald-trump-justice-department-fears

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19887
    • View Profile
FBI gets involved in simple burglaries
« Reply #106 on: November 13, 2024, 10:24:59 AM »
if the burgled are celebrities:

https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-involved-homes-travis-kelce-patrick-mahomes-targeted-hours-apart/

So if someone came into my house and stole something would the FBI care or have time or resources to investigate?


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile
The is How You Get an AG Gaetz
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2024, 10:42:05 AM »
Comey before an appreciative audience describing how he set Flynn, and hence Trump up:

https://x.com/gregg_re/status/1857216473145450823

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile
Politicized FBI Background Check Process
« Reply #109 on: November 17, 2024, 12:04:47 AM »
More on why Trump is likely avoiding the FBI background check process. Big surprise, the political biases of FBI leadership can derail some appointees:

Whistleblower warns FBI can’t be trusted with background checks for Trump’s nominees

By Kerry Picket and Jeff Mordock - The Washington Times - Saturday, November 16, 2024

An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.

The allegations of political bias at the FBI’s Security Division or SecD were revealed in a protected whistleblower disclosure sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which The Washington Times reviewed.

The official said the security clearance process has been “contaminated by the political agendas of [Security Division] officials and other executives in the FBI.”

The process is also subordinate to the same FBI executives who Mr. Trump has promised to sweep out of the agency, according to the whistleblower.

“FBI SecD has been politicized, and both Director [Christopher] Wray and Deputy Director [Paul] Abbate have the ability to examine the background investigations of anyone who is having a security clearance done,” said the disclosure, which was submitted on Saturday.
The FBI whistleblower said lawmakers need to know that the background investigations are conducted by SecD, the same office that has been accused of weaponizing the process and using it to retaliate against FBI employees because of their political views, including conservative and pro-Trump views.

In a statement to The Times, the FBI cited the executive order and the section of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 that names the FBI as “one of the appropriate agencies responsible for candidate background investigations for Presidential appointees, White House staff, positions requiring Senate confirmation, and other national security positions requiring a security clearance.”

“Being completed as expeditiously as possible, the background investigation focuses on character and conduct. The FBI serves as an investigative service provider and does not adjudicate or render an opinion on the results of the background investigation. The FBI’s role is purely fact-finding. Once the investigation is complete, the report is sent to the Office of White House Counsel or the Office of the President-Elect for their use as deemed appropriate,” the FBI said.

Mr. Trump’s transition team has bypassed the traditional FBI background checks for some of his picks and instead uses private companies to screen the nominees, CNN reported.

The decision to bypass the FBI screening for nominees breaks with Washington norms and coincides with Mr. Trump’s unconventional picks, such as former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, former Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida for attorney general, Pete Haegseth for defense secretary and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for health secretary.

A security clearance is required for some Cabinet posts and that process includes an FBI background check. However, a president can override the process and order a security clearance for nominees, a power Mr. Trump will not have until he’s sworn in on Jan. 20, 2025.

The whistleblower said that SecD yanked security clearances of FBI employees for political reasons and that Mr. Wray and Mr. Abbate will have access to each background check that is performed.

“Under Wray and Abbate, SecD refused clearances to U.S. military veterans, employees who refused to get Covid shots, employees who attended Trump rallies and employees with conservative Christian beliefs,” the disclosure said. “The same FBI officials will be adjudicating President Trump’s nominees. Deputy Director Abbate and Director Wray will have unfettered access to any information that President Trump’s appointees provide during their security clearance background investigation.”

The bureau official also warns that SecD can share the information they learn with the Biden White House.

“There is no wall between the background investigation data held by SecD and the Director’s Office.  Anyone providing information to the FBI for background investigations should assume that the information, along with all associated electronic inquiries, will be provided to Deputy Director Abbate, Director Wray or even officials in the current White House administration for ‘national security reasons.’”

What’s more, anything that is gleaned from the background checks can be used by the bureau to send “lead” information to state officials for potential prosecutions, according to the disclosure.

“Based on statements that the FBI top leadership should be cleaned out, senior FBI officials have a personal interest in protecting their positions by providing background information to other agencies or giving informal briefings,” it said.

“Although the FBI may advise that it does not provide interim clearances, it actually does. One example of the FBI executives abusing their security authorization privilege was when Director Comey’s leaker from Columbia University was provided a security clearance or when leadership is allowed to maintain security clearances in order to get retirement jobs.”

Although security clearance background interviews are conducted by agents from FBI field offices, the security clearance investigations are controlled and adjudicated by SecD. Parts of SecD are located in Huntsville, Alabama, but the primary location of SecD and its leadership is at FBI headquarters in Washington.

The disclosure also alleges that there have been “hundreds of complaints of sexual misconduct by senior executives and none of them lost their security clearance.”

Mr. Wray, a 2017 appointee of Mr. Trump, oversaw the bureau through the Capitol riot and almost four years of FBI investigations and arrests of those who participated in the protests.

He has been scrutinized by congressional Republicans for the FBI’s lack of transparency in investigations related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol, its memo to probe the Catholic Church, the raid on Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and pursuit of pro-life activists who protested at abortion clinics.

There is no federal mandate for the FBI to vet presidential appointees, but the bureau has done so since President Eisenhower was in the Oval Office. Agents conduct interviews with a nominee’s friends, families, business associates and others to uncover anything that might prevent a nominee from being issued a security clearance.

The FBI has White House employees fill out an online questionnaire. FBI agents then perform the background check. When the background check is complete, the information they collect on the White House employee is sent to Sec D.

Sec D then reviews any uncovered criminal histories, conflicts of interest, financial problems, ties to foreign governments or other potentially disqualifying factors to determine whether to deny or approve the clearance.

Concerns have been raised about the backgrounds of some of Mr. Trump’s nominees.

Mr. Gaetz was the subject of a Justice Department sex trafficking probe, but prosecutors declined to bring charges.

He was also the subject of a House Ethics Committee investigation for alleged sexual misconduct, illegal drug use and accepting improper gifts. The investigation ended when he resigned from his House seat this week. He has denied any wrongdoing.

Ms. Gabbard has frequently taken political positions critics said were favorable to American adversaries, including Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Mr. Kennedy is a vaccine skeptic who advocates for food purity and unorthodox medical treatments. He has been mired in an extramarital sexting scandal with New York magazine political reporter Olivia Nuzzi, though he was joined by his wife, actress Cheryl Hines, at a Mr. Trump’s gala Thursday at Mar-a-Lago.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/nov/16/whistleblower-warns-fbi-trusted-background-checks-/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3263
    • View Profile
How to Reorg/Reform the FBI
« Reply #110 on: November 20, 2024, 03:44:08 PM »
No doubt misfiled, but given that this dismantling effort will defang the FBI and its ability to serve political masters to political ends, I am down with this approach, particularly as it will serve to fire a shot across the bow of EVERY bloated agency and serves as a model for how to combine federal efforts by function, pulling law enforcement function out of orgs that tainted by politics, or privatizes these functions.

This proposal does leave one burning question: what will happen to all those hagiographic FBI TV shows?

As that may be, these outcomes couldn’t happen to a nicer set of bastards:


Take apart the FBI, piece by piece. Here's how.

J Michael Waller
@JMichaelWaller
·
Nov 15
Take an antitrust approach to the FBI. The Bureau has value. But it has become predatory, abusive, and dangerous to the public. So it must be taken apart in favor of something new.

Here's an action plan for what to do with the FBI, drawn from chapter 37 of my book, Big Intel: How the CIA and FBI Went from Cold War Heroes to Deep State Villains (Regnery, 2024).

The plan examines the anatomy of the FBI and proposes what to do with each part. The plan leaves room for creating better efficiencies in federal investigations, counterintelligence, law enforcement, and other essential functions. For now, we look at the FBI's structure and functions.

FBI is only a bureaucracy, not created by any law

Like the Bureau of Engraving and Printing or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the FBI, as its name states, is only a bureaucracy. J. Edgar Hoover built that bureaucracy's brand. Once we get over the brand name and stop thinking of the Bureau as "sacred," we see the emperor has no clothes.

No statutory basis exists for the FBI. The FBI has no legal charter. The FBI traces its founding to a one-page attorney general memorandum from 1908.

Therefore, the FBI can be abolished by an attorney general memorandum.
 
So how would we protect ourselves as a country without an FBI?

Take a critical look at the FBI and its components, and it's easy to see how.

FBI's basic structure

The FBI has six branches, each of which is divided into units called divisions.
The six branches are:
National Security Branch
Intelligence Branch
Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch
Science and Technology Branch
Information and Technology Branch
Human Resources Branch

These branches awkwardly make the FBI a domestic intelligence agency with police powers - a threat to our constitutional system. No other major democracy has a domestic intelligence agency with police powers.

Many FBI functions duplicate what other agencies already do. So in the interests of curbing the FBI, we have to take the imperfect approach of transferring duplicative functions to other agencies.

That approach risks empowering other problematic agencies, which we will have to deal with later.

National Security Branch

This politicized and compromised FBI branch must be broken apart, division by division, with relevant personnel, authority, equipment, and budgets transferred to other agencies and, where feasible, removed from federal authority completely and handed back to the 50 states.
Counterintelligence Division. Made notorious by its head, Peter Strzok, the Counterintelligence Division doesn't do as much spy-hunting as the FBI wants people to think. It has a poor track record. It goes after the low-hanging fruit, and is not a strategic tool to penetrate and disrupt hostile intelligence organizations from within.

Counterintelligence should be moved out of the FBI, with the National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC), a unit of the Department of Homeland Security, moved out of DHS. This will be difficult, because NCSC is flaccid and politicized.

Both should be combined into an independent Counterintelligence Service (CIS) with its own ethos as a spy-hunting organization, similar to what the short-lived National Counterintelligence Executive (NCIX) was designed to have been.

The CIS - which does not exist - would inherit all the personnel, data, technology, and other resources of the FBI Counterintelligence Division and NCSC, retain the most capable and promising personnel, and hunt foreign spies. It would not answer to the Justice Department. DOJ would be responsible solely for prosecuting spies as CIS finds necessary.

Counterterrorism Division. Create a stand-alone counterterrorism agency that has no law-enforcement functions. Remove the Counterterrorism Division, the Terrorist Screening Center, and related elements from the FBI. At the same time, remove the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. NCTC has its own problems to be addressed.
Merge the FBI's former counterterrorism functions and resources with the NCTC into a new, small, stand-alone counterterrorist agency. The proper leadership will transform the agency ethos, cull incompetent and inefficient personnel, and build a small CT service with no law enforcement powers. At the same time, dispense with the "domestic violent extremist" approach and focus on real terrorism.

Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate. The FBI's WMDD already duplicates the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives of DHS. ATF is already a significant problem. As with counterintelligence and counterterrorism, remove WMDD from the FBI, remove ATF from DHS, cull the personnel, and create a new, small, independent unit dealing with weapons of mass destruction inside the United States. The new service will have no law enforcement powers and will not answer to DOJ.

The FBI National Security Branch is thus dissolved.

Intelligence Branch

The FBI Intelligence Branch collects information and synthesizes it into analytical products and coordination with other agencies. Such a branch, with entirely different standards of evidence from a law enforcement agency, has no place in the Department of Justice at all.
Divide the Intelligence Branch and its personnel along topical and functional lines. Parcel them out to other agencies with the legal authority and obligation to perform those varied work functions. This includes the new independent counterintelligence, counterterrorism, and WMD services.

The FBI intelligence branch is thus dissolved.

Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch

This FBI branch is a mishmash of functions patchworked together since 9/11. It performs important duties, though, and does not have the reputation of being as politicized as the rest of the Bureau.

The Trump Administration can take apart this branch without public danger.

Criminal Investigation Division. This division combats organized crime, international crime, certain violent crimes under federal statute, and certain crimes against children. It also investigates public corruption, financial crimes, and violations of civil rights laws.
The public corruption unit tends to attract some of the most politicized elements of the FBI.

DOJ must transfer as many criminal investigative functions as possible to the states that wish to assume them. Those states can receive federal block grants for the purpose of improving their own capabilities, free of federal interference.

FBI's financial crimes unit should be transferred to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has robust financial crimes capabilities.
The remainder of the Criminal Investigation Division should go to the United States Marshals Service, which is the only federal law enforcement entity created by America's Founding Fathers. All FBI personnel going to the Marshals would be screened for adequacy and retrained under the Marshals ethos.

Cyber Division. Cyber is an increasingly important criminal and national security domain. Because of cyber's growing politicization, often to extremist ends, the solutions offered here are only interim.

Transfer the Cyber Division's security functions to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), while moving the very politicized CISA out of the Department of Homeland Security. The merger between CD and CISA, under proper leadership, would result in a professional, stand-alone cyber security agency. Cyber Division's intelligence functions and resources will go to the new Counterintelligence Service (CIS) created from the FBI's Counterintelligence Division and DHS's NCSC.

Cyber Division's law enforcement functions should be transferred out of DOJ to the independent U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

Critical Incident Response Group. The Response portion of the branch is a crisis management unit. It should be transferred to FEMA, which itself needs a complete overhaul.

Services. The Services section of the branch assists victims of terrorism and crime. Its duties should go to FEMA and the Department of Health and Human Services. The budget for this unit can go to disaster-prone states as block grants, which the states can spend on disaster relief as they see fit.

A separate unit, International Operations, coordinates federal law enforcement abroad to investigate transnational crimes and to assist foreign countries in assisting American investigators. These experienced personnel can be placed in the service of other federal agencies that presently perform law enforcement/counterterrorism/counter-WMD work abroad, or which would do so under the proposed changes.
The FBI Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch is thus dissolved.

Science and Technology Branch

This small FBI branch creates new scientific and technological methods, products, and training for the rest of the FBI's operations, and provides important support support to state and local law enforcement. Private companies already create these products and services, such as forensic sciences (fingerprint, DNA, and other biometric analysis), other scientific analysis, computer forensics, safe transport of evidence and hazardous materials. The branch also runs the FBI Crime Lab, FBI information services, and the National Crime Information Center.
In Big Intel, I proposed handing the Science and Technology Branch over to FEMA, or establishing it as a stand-alone entity under rotating governors, but after consideration, many functions of the branch should be privatized, with the Crime Lab and National Crime Information Center transferred to the US Marshals.

The FBI Science and Technology Branch is thus dissolved.

Information and Technology Branch

The purpose of this branch is to manage FBI information and maintain and upgrade the Bureau's information systems. With the FBI being dismembered, the need for this branch is mooted, though the experienced personnel, with their specialized training can be transferred to other agencies along with related FBI components.

The FBI Information and Technology Branch is thus dissolved.

Human Resources Branch

This branch will not be transferred anywhere. Its personnel will leave the federal workforce.

The exception is the FBI Academy, which resides in this branch. Since the FBI Academy offers basic training for special agents and other law enforcement, it can be transferred to the US Marshals.

The FBI Human Resources Branch is thus dissolved.

Field Offices

The FBI has 56 field offices and smaller offices across the United States. These offices have secure facilities and other resources that the Marshals, the SEC, the Postal Inspector, the new independent Counterintelligence Service, the new counterterrorism and counter-WMD services, and so forth, can use without disruption, independently and out of their own budgets. Many field offices can be shut down for good.
Unnecessary secrecy

FBI abuses of power, and threats to the Constitution, have been possible because of excessive secrecy. This unnecessary secrecy must be undone and exposed.

FBI abuses of power, and threats to the Constitution, have been possible because of excessive secrecy. This unnecessary secrecy must be undone and exposed. All citizens should have the right to any FBI files - unredacted - on them, with pending criminal or national security investigations, reviewed by judges, as the sole exceptions.

Conclusion

With these steps, the FBI is dismembered, its essential components scattered, in an orderly fashion without disruption to legitimate federal investigations, law enforcement, and national security functions.

Abolish all Special Agent in Charge and SES-level FBI positions prior to dismemberment. Sell FBI headquarters at the J. Edgar Hoover Building to developers and demolish it. Surplus and sell the planned FBI campus in Prince George's County, Maryland, that is twice the size of the Pentagon building.

Complexities in the dismantling of the FBI, especially concerning the Bureau's colossal and extremely sensitive data systems, are to be expected. But these complexities are unacceptable excuses for not dismembering the Bureau quickly.

After this, we can proceed to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security.

https://x.com/jmichaelwaller/status/1857617933536542991?s=61

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
FBI and J6
« Reply #112 on: December 02, 2024, 08:17:06 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19574
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: December 03, 2024, 06:19:24 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
Catherine Herridge
« Reply #116 on: December 09, 2024, 03:41:50 AM »
TOPLINE:

With Kash Patel’s nomination to lead the FBI, an independent watchdog may soon bring needed transparency to allegations of government overreach targeting GOP congressional investigators, including Patel, probing the origins of the FBI’s Russia probe, “Crossfire Hurricane.”

The findings may tell us a lot about the power of Washington’s unelected bureaucracy.

DEEP DIVE:

There are some stories you don’t forget because of the pressure that is brought to bear on you by the government bureaucracy to walk away from the reporting.

One of those stories came in 2018, when a review of congressional emails revealed a senior justice department official Rod Rosenstein had allegedly threatened staffers on the House intelligence committee, among them Kash Patel.   

Context matters: At the time, Patel and his team were systematically dismantling the premise for the FBI’s 2016 “Crossfire Hurricane” probe that investigated alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. 

Because Patel had deep experience at the Justice Department, he understood and could expose defects in the surveillance (FISA) warrants for Trump campaign aide Carter Page, among other irregularities in the FBI/DOJ case.

At the time, I was the chief intelligence correspondent for Fox News based in Washington D.C. The Fox story was headlined “(Rod) Rosenstein threatened to ‘subpoena’ GOP-led committee in ‘chilling’ clash over records, emails show”

It was straightforward, document driven reporting, but the response from the DOJ was severe and, in my experience, disproportionate.  We had reviewed emails that memorialized a January 2018 closed-door meeting between senior FBI and DOJ officials and members of the House Intelligence committee.

The 2018 report read, “The DAG [Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein] criticized the Committee for sending our requests in writing and was further critical of the Committee’s request to have DOJ/FBI do the same when responding,” the committee's then-senior counsel for counterterrorism Kash Patel wrote to the House Office of General Counsel.”

The report continued, “Going so far as to say that if the Committee likes being litigators, then ‘we [DOJ] too [are] litigators, and we will subpoena your records and your emails,’ referring to HPSCI [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] and Congress overall.”

The pushback to the story was swift and severe.   Reps for the FBI and DOJ disputed the email account.   “The FBI disagrees with a number of characterizations of the meeting as described in the excerpts of a staffer’s emails provided to us by Fox News.”

“A DOJ official insisted Rosenstein ‘never threatened anyone in the room with a criminal investigation.’ The official added that department and bureau officials in the room ‘are all quite clear that the characterization of events laid out here is false,” adding that Rosenstein was responding to a threat of contempt.’’”


My understanding of the 2018 meeting would change when new claims were made public in a 2023 lawsuit brought by Patel against FBI Director Wray and former Justice Department officials.

At the time, I was working as a senior investigative correspondent for CBS News in Washington D.C. According to the 2023 lawsuit, a subpoena for Patel’s “personal information” had already been obtained before the confrontational 2018 meeting.   

According to court records, “On November 20, 2017, while Mr. Patel was still in his role as Senior Counsel and Chief Investigator for the HPSCI (House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence), the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) secretly sought a grand jury subpoena to compel Google to turn over Mr. Patel’s private email account data. They did so in complete contravention of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure.”

The lawsuit continued, “DOJ sought the subpoena for Mr. Patel’s private accounts without a legitimate basis in a chilling attempt to surveil the person leading the Legislative Branch’s investigation into the Department of Justice’s conduct during the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. This was a blatant abuse and violation of the separation of powers by DOJ, a violation of Mr. Patel’s constitutional rights, and an attempt to find a way to silence an investigation into DOJ’s questionable conduct, as detailed below.  DOJ couldn’t subpoena Mr. Patel’s official accounts without sparking a public, political and legal battle; thus, they went for his personal accounts, in a non-public and unconstitutional manner, seeking dirt on Mr. Patel.”

Timing matters:  Based on the lawsuit, the DOJ sought Patel’s records BEFORE the 2018 meeting.  The lawsuit described it as a “politically motivated investigation.”

According to the 2023 lawsuit, Patel learned about the subpoena several years later, in 2022, when Google notified him the DOJ had sought information related to his personal accounts.

The court records state, “Mr. Patel was wholly unaware of this subpoena until December 12, 2022, when, in line with its policy, Google notified Mr. Patel that DOJ issued it a subpoena for information related to his personal accounts.”


In September this year, a Memorandum Opinion from the court, said the defendants motion to dismiss the complaint was granted.  Among the arguments, that these officials are “entitled to qualified immunity…”

A separate watchdog report may soon bring needed transparency to these allegations of government overreach.  In this case, claims that some senior FBI and DOJ officials abused their authority to gather information on congressional investigators scrutinizing the origins of the FBI Russia collusion probe.

I will have more to say, in the future, about my experience reporting the story and the personal blowback from government officials.

While this content is free, consider becoming a monthly member to support independent journalism and access future content.

Thank you for the consideration and, most of all, for supporting our work!

Best, Catheri

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19574
    • View Profile
Re: Catherine Herridge
« Reply #117 on: December 09, 2024, 08:36:48 AM »
"DOJ sought the subpoena for Mr. Patel’s private accounts without a legitimate basis in a chilling attempt to surveil the person leading the Legislative Branch’s investigation into the Department of Justice’s conduct during the Crossfire Hurricane investigation."

  - This is not the America we think we live in or that we want to live in.

The other proposal was to close the FBI. We need a federal law enforcement agency to look at real, interstate crime. I hope they can clear out all the evil and keep all the good workers in this large federal agency.

We know a young man who works major crimes at a major FBI office and has nothing to do, I presume, with the rot at the top. The partisan, criminal, unconstitutional behavior of these people is a distraction and a hindrance to the real work that needs to be done at the agency.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2024, 06:51:30 AM by DougMacG »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
Good Riddance to Wray
« Reply #119 on: December 12, 2024, 09:12:58 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
FBI on J6 per the IG report
« Reply #120 on: December 12, 2024, 01:01:37 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile
FBI
« Reply #121 on: December 13, 2024, 10:55:50 AM »
This goes deeper into the weeds than I can comprehend:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1867600933116318092.html
 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72713
    • View Profile