Author Topic: FBI, DOJ, SS Follies, Entrapment Attempts, & Stasi-Like Schemes (CIA & ATF, too)  (Read 31616 times)

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile


"How does an authentic movie about military or FBI failures get made without the cooperation of those resource gatekeepers?"

I agree there are complexities here, but at the risk of sounding glib, do it the way Hillsdtale College does-- without federal money/help.

Worth noting too is that with computer generated effects as are used all over the place now, the Pentagon help in providing props becomes decreasingly important.

I was not aware Hillsdale college produces TV shows and movies. What would those titles be [/glib]?

The fact so many producers of TV shows and movies believe availing themselves upon these resources help them sell their product seems to suggest they find the resource to be a valuable, and perhaps critical, one, so much so that they are willing to cede script control which, as I understand it, is considered a Big Deal in those circles.

And though we’ve been learning of a lot of ridiculous spending these days, one presumes the formerly woke DoD and the Deep State organs like the FBI has become wouldn’t spend money on these sorts of liaisons if they didn’t anticipate commensurate returns.

Indeed as I noted elsewhere, while recovering from a Whipple procedure, chemo, titanium plate inserted in foot, et al, I perused a lot of TV, noting a TON of FBI-themed shows like these:

https://www.imdb.com/find/?q=fbi&s=tt&ttype=tv&ref_=fn_ttl_pop

The few I watched—all were pretty bad IMO—presented the FBI heroically. Money well spent, I guess.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2025, 03:47:51 PM by Body-by-Guinness »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Some Animals are More Equal than Others
« Reply #151 on: February 07, 2025, 04:31:00 PM »
Dox DOGE whiz kids? Why not? Hound those that walked through doors help open by Capitol Police on Jan. 6? Just following orders. Have their names exposed so their friends, family, neighbors, and peers know they were part of this unequally applied putative law enforcement effort? Hell no:

Trump admin agrees not to publicly release names of FBI agents on Jan. 6 probes
FBI agents seek job protection
•The Hill News / by Ella Lee / Feb 7, 2025 at 1:27 PM

The Trump administration agreed Friday not to publicly release the names of FBI agents who played a role in investigations tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack without providing two days' notice. 

Sixteen FBI agents who worked on the probes sued the government soon after the agency’s Tuesday deadline to turn over responses to a survey about employees’ work on the more than 1,500 cases stemming from the riot. They claimed the review laid the groundwork for retaliation following President Trump’s vows for retribution against his perceived political enemies. 

“Once this happens, if this happens, the damage is irreparable,” Margaret Donovan, an attorney for the FBI agents, said during a hearing Thursday.   

As part of the agreement, the Justice Department (DOJ) said the government would not disseminate the list of names to the public “directly or indirectly” pending the outcome of the lawsuits without giving two days' notice, at which point attorneys for the FBI agents could argue for a temporary block on its ability to do so.   

The deal was not easily reached.   

Justice Department lawyers on Thursday insisted that the DOJ itself had not authorized the public release of the names and had no plan to, nor had it given a formal go-ahead to share the list of names with other government entities.   

But when asked to represent that other government entities — like the White House or the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — would not publicly share the names if they gained access, the government lawyers demurred.   

“I’m not in a position to make representations,” DOJ lawyer Jeremy Simon said. 

“Why?” pressed U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb. “You’re the attorney for the U.S. government.” 

The agreement, which Cobb approved Friday afternoon, would not stop the Justice Department from disseminating the list to other government entities, though it appears those entities would also be bound not to publicly release the names without notice.   

The FBI agents will file their motions for a preliminary injunction by Feb. 24 and the government will file its opposition by March 14. A hearing on the preliminary injunction was set for March 27.

Lawyers for the FBI agents sought to bar any government entity from releasing the names, noting that Trump and acolytes like billionaire Elon Musk, who spearheads DOGE, had already publicly shunned government employees in recent weeks.   

They also said that pardoned Jan. 6 defendants have expressed excitement on social media about the release of the FBI agents’ names, suggesting “horrendous” risk would follow the publication of the agents’ information.   

“Do we really want to wait until one person gets injured when someone shows up at their house? Is that the way we really want to go?” said Mark Zaid, another attorney for the agents. 

The government said any such risk is “entirely speculative.” Simon noted that the Justice Department officials collecting agents’ information were following the president’s executive order to weed out “weaponization” in the federal government.   

“I understand they don’t agree with that executive order, but that is not something they’ve contended is unlawful,” Simon said. 

FBI agents were directed to fill out a 13-question survey about their roles in the Capitol riot cases by Monday, asking them to define their roles in the Jan. 6 cases and whether they conducted surveillance, collected evidence, arrested individuals or testified in court. That information was due to be turned over to DOJ by Tuesday at noon. 

In an apparent act of defiance, acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll returned the survey with only agents’ unique identifier codes, instead of their names. 

Zaid said that decision marked the “last roadblock” in place to protect the employees’ physical safety and reputations. DOJ leadership called the move “insubordination” in an email to all FBI agents.

In court filings Friday, the parties notified the court that the FBI had given the DOJ a record pairing the unique identifiers with corresponding names. However, the terms of the agreement encompass that list, as well.

Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, a former personal attorney for President Trump, said Wednesday that the DOJ would not target FBI employees who “simply followed orders and carried out their duties in an ethical manner” on Jan. 6 cases. 

The lawsuits followed a purge of dozens of DOJ and FBI officials, including the five highest career positions at the FBI, agents who worked on Trump’s two criminal cases and approximately two dozen prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases.   

Chris Mattei, an attorney representing the FBI Agents Association, said the order ensures FBI agents can “continue to do their jobs without fear of public exposure or retaliation.”

Updated at 1:05 p.m. EST

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5133075-trump-fbi-names-jan-6/



Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Turnabout is Fair Play, Especially when One Side Played so Unfairly
« Reply #154 on: February 17, 2025, 03:42:56 PM »
It’s difficult to feel much sympathy for malign weasels such as these FBI supervisors:

One big issue with the FBI

TOM KNIGHTON

FEB 17, 2025

Photo by Jack Young on Unsplash

President Donald Trump isn’t playing around with the FBI. Many have claimed that he’s engaging in retribution for him being prosecuted, for his supporters being prosecuted over January 6th, and so on.

Tilting At Windmills is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

To be fair, they may have a point. I just don’t care about it all that much after years of Democrats doing the same thing to anyone who disagreed with them.

And it seems that many of those “purged” from the FBI were just the kind of people who liked to do that sort of thing.

Democrats have cast the Trump administration’s ouster of eight senior FBI leaders as a “purge” and act of “retribution” from a weaponized Justice Department, some likening it to President Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre.”

But former colleagues of the terminated “G-men” say this narrative is backward. FBI officials, past and present, have marshaled significant evidence via whistleblower complaints and testimony indicating that several terminated leaders routinely used their offices for partisan purposes.

These include allegations that at least two of the fired officials, Jeffrey Veltri and Dena Perkins, manipulated the security clearance review process to personally and professionally punish conservatives, COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, and Jan. 6 whistleblowers who reported suspected bureau malfeasance, and retaliated against those who came to the whistleblowers’ defense.

A third, Timothy Dunham, is also alleged to have improperly suspended security clearances.


And let’s understand, these accusations weren’t just fabricated by Republicans, though I know some morons would likely claim they were.

No, these are based on real people with real experiences being the victim of such things.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) read numerous accounts of alleged misconduct perpetrated by these and other officials into the record this morning as the committee considered the nomination of Kash Patel for FBI Director.

One subordinate of the three terminated individuals, a former supervisory special agent in the Security Division, “SecD,” from which Veltri and Perkins hailed, and whom Dunham oversaw, told the committee:

I witnessed abuses committed against multiple employees by FBI senior leaders, particularly by Jeff Veltri and Dena Perkins. I also saw SecD retaliate against five of its own employees for protesting these unlawful practices. Because I spoke out against these abuses, Perkins and Timothy Dunham suspended my security clearance, costing me my job and continuing employment, totaling approximately $700,000 in lost wages and retirement benefits.

Another former FBI official, Marcus Allen, told the committee that Veltri and Perkins “caused the suspension of my security clearance because I questioned whether the FBI Director was truthful to Congress and whether the FBI was obeying the law and Constitution in the January 6, 2021 investigations.” What followed left “financial and emotional damage to me and my family will never be completely restored.”

A third, Special Agent Garret O’Boyle, who has been indefinitely suspended without pay for well over two years in alleged retaliation for whistleblowing, told the committee that Veltri, Perkins, Dunham, “and other leadership up to Christopher Wray, are responsible for what happened to me and my family.”

“Ensuring that they no longer work at the FBI is not retribution; it’s responsible leadership.”


This is absolutely vile.

It’s not like they were sympathetic to terrorist groups. I suspect this bunch would have been fine with that, so long as they were the right terrorist groups.

No, they held different opinions about domestic politics and how the bureau should operate.

What’s more, this is just this one little part of the bureau. What else are we going to find down the road? What else have they managed to hide from the world where we’ll never see it?

The ATF was already a big issue so far as federal law enforcement went, but the FBI is probably even worse when you look at all the ways they can hurt the average American.

I’d like to believe that they wouldn’t go quite that far, but look at all the people they prosecuted for January 6th. They didn’t just go after people who got destructive or violent. They went after anyone who set foot inside the Capitol that day, including journalists reporting on the incident.

If you run afoul of the FBI, as it currently sits, they can and will destroy your life. The process is the punishment. They can and will ruin you if they decide it’s worth it. Just paying attorney fees is more than enough to accomplish that, but the hit your reputation will take is also at play here.

They don’t have to convict you to ruin your relationships, your standing in the community, or anything of that sort.

At least some will figure you just got lucky rather than that you were innocent, and just how many will likely depend on the charges.

Thanks for reading Tilting At Windmills! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

So even if Trump is motivated by revenge, I really can’t feel that bad about it. I watched Obama use the IRS to punish conservatives by holding up non-profit status for groups on the right and I watched Biden (or whoever used him as their own personal Bernie) use the FBI to crack down on his opponents, including the raid of Donald Trump’s home.

Turnabout is fair play, in this case, and if it’s going to happen no matter how much one tries to take the high ground and the media won’t acknowledge that’s happening, then why play nice?

Getting rid of the problem children who are screwing with anyone who won’t toe the line, though, isn’t remotely the same thing as what all we’ve seen from the left over the years.

So no, I’m not upset over it. I just wish it wasn’t warranted.

https://tomknighton.substack.com/p/one-big-issue-with-the-fbi?r=2k0c5&triedRedirect=true

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Bongino Deputy FBI Director
« Reply #155 on: February 23, 2025, 05:53:02 PM »
Perhaps misfiled, but some parades a gonna be rained on even harder still:

#BREAKING: Dan Bongino named deputy FBI director by Trump.
Bongino joins Kash Patel.



Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Kelly to Comey: We are Coming for You
« Reply #158 on: February 26, 2025, 03:26:30 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile
Is the "Kelly" of the subject line an error?

Anyway, though a bit of a loose cannon sometimes IMHO Flynn was head of the DIA if I remember correctly, so he would not be unfamiliar with how skullduggery games are played , , ,


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile
SDNY FBI hiding/hid Epstein documents
« Reply #161 on: February 27, 2025, 04:28:08 PM »
Just Facts
1h  ·
An informant has told Attorney General Pam Bondi that FBI officials in New York have failed to disclose “thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation” of Jeffrey Epstein, despite orders to release them.
Here are disturbing facts about what FBI officials in NY did in this case:
Two days after Epstein’s arrest in 2019, the Department of Justice sent a letter to a judge arguing that he should be denied bail. The letter, co-signed by Maurene Comey (daughter of Jim Comey), reveals that a search of Epstein’s New York residence on the night of his arrest found:
• “an extraordinary volume of photographs of nude and partially-nude young women or girls.”
• “compact discs” in “a locked safe” with “hand-written labels” like “Girl pics nude” and “Young [Name] + [Name].”
Maria Farmer, a victim of Epstein who reported him to the FBI in 1996, told CBS News that Epstein’s mansion in New York was loaded with hidden cameras. Describing a surveillance room with a large number of monitors, she said, “I looked on the cameras, and I saw toilet, toilet, bed, bed, toilet, bed.” She also said the house was “videoed, all the time,” and when she asked Epstein “What do you do with this?” he replied, “I keep it. I keep everything in my safe.”
Incredibly, after the feds cut open Epstein’s safe, they abandoned its contents and left the home unguarded. When they came back four days later, the contents of the safe were gone. These facts only came to light in 2021 during the sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, not because the Department of Justice disclosed them to the public.
The official transcript of the sixth day of the trial—obtained exclusively by Just Facts—shows that the search team leader of Epstein’s home, FBI Special Agent Kelly Maguire, testified under oath to the following:
• The FBI executed a search warrant of Epstein’s mansion on the day of his arrest (July 6, 2019), but the warrant limited what could be searched and seized, so the agents obtained a broader warrant on July 7, which they executed that day.
• Under those two warrants, agents located Epstein’s safe, cut it open, and found in it “binders that contained CDs,” “external hard drives,” “jewelry,” “loose diamonds,” and “large amounts of U.S. currency and passports.”
• Instead of seizing all of this evidence, the FBI agents placed it on the top and side of the safe, took a picture of it, and left it completely unguarded.
• The alleged reason why they didn’t seize the contents of the safe is that they didn’t “have legal authority to seize all of the CDs that day”—even though they had already obtained a second broader warrant.
• Evidencing that the warrant didn’t exclude all CDs, Maguire was asked, “Now, at the time you observed these CDs on the safe, did you have legal authority to seize all of the CDs that day?” and she replied, “No, not all of them.”
• When Maguire returned to Epstein’s house on July 11 with a search warrant that gave her “legal authority” to seize what they left behind, she “observed that all of the items” shown in the “photograph that I had previously seen were missing.”
• Maguire then had a 3-way phone call with an “associate of Mr. Epstein named Richard Kahn and his legal counsel named Andrew Tomback.”
• Within 30 minutes of “that telephone conversation, Richard Kahn came to the residence of Jeffrey Epstein” and “brought all of those items” back to Maguire “in two suitcases.”
• Maguire said that the contents of the suitcases “appeared to be all of the items that had been previously located in the safe,” but she “didn’t look at what was on any of these CDs” before Epstein’s associates took them.
Just Facts shared the facts above with a veteran police detective and asked for his thoughts. The detective, who has been involved in the execution of more 100 search warrants, replied:
• “This is unprecedented in my experience and violates basic protocols.”
• “There is no apparent reason why a warrant in a child sex trafficking case would prohibit a search team from seizing items from a safe, especially CDs labeled with the names of potential victims.”
• “Even if the warrant was so oddly restrictive, law enforcement has a duty to guard the evidence until another warrant is obtained to seize it.
• “FBI agents, who are highly trained and heavily resourced to handle such matters, undoubtedly know that you don’t abandon evidence.”
Adding to the stench of a cover up, the person who took the contents of the safe (Richard Kahn) is not merely an “associate” of Epstein but is heavily implicated in his crimes. A 2021 civil complaint filed by the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands states that Kahn and another person named Darren Indyke:
• were “the indispensable captains of Epstein’s criminal enterprise, roles for which they were richly rewarded.”
• “organized, controlled, and directed almost every aspect” of Epstein’s dealings.
• were “officers in virtually every corporate entity that Epstein created to fund and conceal his activities.”
• “directed, approved, enabled, and justified millions of dollars in payments that fueled the Epstein Enterprise’s sex trafficking.”
• helped create “a steady supply of vulnerable female children”—including “numerous girls between the age of 12 and 17 years old”—who were placed “into sexual servitude in service of Epstein’s desires, and those of his associates.”
• are the co-executors of Epstein’s estate and continue to “engage in a course of conduct aimed at concealing the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise.”
• have “approved the release” of funds from Epstein’s estate to “pay for the legal fees and costs of persons” who allegedly “participated in the criminal activity of the Epstein Enterprise.”
To this day, the federal government hasn’t revealed the names of the people that were written beside the “young” females on the CDs in Epstein’s safe. Again, this is where Epstein kept the footage from his hidden cameras, according to Maria Farmer.
The FBI is also keeping other information under wraps. After Epstein died, Farmer told CBS News that the FBI “failed” her by not acting on the complaint she filed in 1996 and added, “They are trying to pretend I do not exist. I want my report and I want it printed out so I can show everyone how much they failed. I don’t know if I’ll ever get it. We’ve been requesting it forever.”
Bondi’s Letter
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1895195194947183047
Hyperlinks to the primary sources of all the facts above are available at https://www.justfactsdaily.com/federal-report-on-the...



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20468
    • View Profile
 :x :x

Either deep staters were onvolved  Epstein's prostitution ring or they are taking bribes.

or something to do with rumors Espstein was an FBI informant.

possible ala Edgar Hoover digging dirt on important people.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile
Or the Mossad.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile
FBI:
« Reply #166 on: March 15, 2025, 02:53:32 PM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20270
    • View Profile
Re: Pay No Attention to the Man Prancing Naked on the Laptop
« Reply #170 on: April 03, 2025, 04:50:22 AM »
The FBI stacks the deck for the Big Guy:

https://nypost.com/2025/04/02/opinion/miranda-devine-new-fbi-chat-logs-reveal-extraordinary-gag-order-senior-leadership-used-to-shutdown-any-hunter-biden-laptop-discussion/?utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=android_nyp

Disgusting behavior - by so-called law enforcement. Beyond firing everyone involved there should be charges.  If not treason, federal election interference?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74639
    • View Profile
From your lips to AG Bondi's ears!

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Halper Unredacted
« Reply #172 on: April 10, 2025, 05:42:06 PM »
New docs show key Russiagate figure was not trusted by FBI, and was motivated by money:

FBI memos now reveal $1.2 million compensation, reliability concerns for Russia collusion informant

Newly declassified documents show informant Stefan Halper was motivated in part by "monetary compensation" and was paid nearly $1.2 million from FBI over three decades.

By Jerry Dunleavy and John Solomon

Published: April 10, 2025 6:18pm

A key FBI informant in the widely-debunked Russia collusion case was paid nearly $1.2 million over three decades, was motivated in part by "monetary compensation," and continued snitching even after agents concluded he told them an inaccurate story about future Trump National Security Advisor Mike Flynn, newly declassified documents show.

The nearly 700 pages of once-secret documents, obtained by Just the News, were recently turned over by FBI Director Kash Patel to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan after President Donald Trump ordered them declassified at the start of his second administration.

They provide the most extensive portrait yet of former FBI informant Stefan Halper, a Pentagon consultant and academic who, along with retired British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, was used by bureau agents to build the Crossfire Hurricane case against Trump and his advisers during the end of the 2016 election and the beginning of Trump's first term in office.

The memos confirm Halper was the source of one of the most sensational bogus claims to land in the FBI's probe in summer 2016: that Flynn had left a 2014 foreign meeting alone with Russia scholar Svetlana Lokhova when he was a three-star general leading the Defense Intelligence Agency.

FBI agents ultimately deemed Halper's account to be "not plausible" and "not accurate", but the bureau proceeded to investigate Flynn, kept paying Halper and continued to vouch for his veracity as a confidential human source codenamed "Mitch," the memos show.

For instance, a March 2017 memo showed the FBI's Validation Management Unit wrote that it "assesses it is likely HALPER is suitable for continued operation, based on his or her authenticity, reliability, and control.”

That memo makes no mention in its unredacted portions of the concerns about the account Halper gave about Flynn and Lokhova, which were confirmed in a memo from William Barnett, the FBI agent who handled the retired Flynn’s case in 2016 and 2017.

Paid more than $1 million
The new FBI records also show Halper was paid $70,000 by the FBI between August 2016 and the start of February 2017 — a time period spanning his activation as an informant targeting the Trump campaign and then the 2016 election and Trump’s inauguration. The FBI records also showed that the bureau had paid Halper “$1,181,064.44” from 1991 into early 2017.

You can read the FBI's declassified records on Halper here:

Stefan Halper - Crossfire Hurricane Declassified Binder

Halper did not respond to a request for comment which Just the News made through his lawyer, Robert Luskin.

The “Crossfire Hurricane Redacted Binder” submitted to Congress and obtained by Just the News includes, among other things, slightly less-redacted versions of the tasking orders and debriefings of the two main confidential human sources, Halper and Steele. The new documents are certain to raise continued concerns in Congress about the FBI's management and validation of informants, an issue that has been repeatedly flagged by the Justice Department's watchdog.

FBI vouches for Halper after he fed false info on Flynn
The FBI’s Validation Management Unit (VMU) conducted a Human Source Validation Report (HSVR) on Halper in early 2017 — and although the declassified document remains heavily redacted, it reveals new information about the FBI’s continued expression of trust in Halper.

The VMU’s review from May 2013 to March 2017 and recommended that the FBI continue using Halper as a source despite FBI agents working the Flynn case determining that he had provided them incorrect information. It is not known whether Halper knew the information was bogus at the time.

“VMU recommends FBI New York continue to operate HALPER. VMU assesses it is likely HALPER will continue to contribute to the FBI’s Counterintelligence Program,” the FBI unit wrote. “While there have been serious handling issues noted in previous HSVRs, VMU did not locate similar issues during this period of review. VMU assesses HALPER has provided valuable information for FBI NY based on his or her unique access.”

The FBI document said Halper was primarily involved in reporting on “Counterintelligence” and secondarily involved in reporting on “Russia.”

“HALPER, code name MITCH, is being utilized to provide information on two initiatives dealing with Russia,” the FBI record states, although one of the initiatives remains entirely redacted.

The other initiative was that Halper “has also provided information pertaining to the U.S. election involving Donald Trump’s close associates and their potential ties to the Russian government.”

Vox parroted this explanation, saying the Trump administration told "a tale of politically motivated persecution of Trump. The argument rests on the distinction between an FBI counterintelligence investigation – an inquiry into a foreign power’s efforts to spy on the US government – and an FBI criminal investigation, which is an effort to investigate whether any federal laws were broken."

The FBI unit said: “VMU assesses it is likely HALPER is suitable for continued operation, based on his or her authenticity, reliability, and control.” The sections of Halper’s alleged authenticity, reliability, and control remain heavily redacted.

The bureau unit also contended that “during the period of review, VMU found no derogatory issues regarding MITCH’s reliability.”

But the FBI unit also admitted: “VMU notes there is no corroboration concerning MITCH’s reporting. Due to the singular nature of his or her access, VMU was unable to locate corroboration concerning MITCH’s reporting.”

Sections on collection requirements, threat issues, and key intelligence questions related to Halper all remain blacked out from public view.

Motivated by money and ideology
The FBI also said in a declassified April 2017 report that Halper had started as a confidential human source (CHS) in December 2008 but then stopped in January 2011, and then reactivated as an FBI source again in March 2011. The bureau said that Halper had previously been “closed” because he had “violated instructions” but that “since the reopening, the CHS has complied with all instructions given to him by the FBI.” The bureau called Halper an “integral part” of Crossfire Hurricane.

The FBI said Halper’s “motivation” for providing information to the FBI was “monetary compensation” and “patriotism/ideology.” The FBI wrote: “CHS behavior has been excellent. The CHS has agreed to assist the case agent in the goals of the investigation. The CHS has devoted significant time and energy to assisting the FBI in its goals.”

When the FBI form asked if there was anything on Halper that “could reasonably be construed as derogatory, including any “statements made by the CHS.”  The FBI answered “none.” The “average CHS utility value” given to Halper by the bureau remains repeatedly blacked out.

DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz released a 2019 report concluding that "the FBI did not comply with the AG Guidelines' requirements and its own policies and procedures for managing long-term CHSs."

The new FBI records reveal that being a CHS for the bureau was quite lucrative for Halper. An FBI annual source report from April 2017 said Halper was paid $70,000 from March 2016 to March 2017 and had been paid $596,906.60 over the course of his many years as a confidential human source up to that point.

An FBI report from April 2017 showed Halper was paid $25,000 in January 2017 and $25,000 in February 2017, with the FBI saying that Halper “was an integral part of a close hold National Security Investigation. CHS has been transferred to a new Case Agent and the CHS’s focus will shift to other matters.”

A $5,000 FBI payment request document by Somma – dated Aug. 15, 2016 – said the payment was for “MITCH” and that it was for work done over a few days in August 2016: “CHS has been integral in the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE investigation. … Current payment is for CHS’s time assisting with the CH investigation.” There was also a $15,000 FBI payment request document – from Aug. 30, 2016 – which was submitted by Somma for work “MITCH” had done from mid-August to early September, with the FBI saying “CHS was integral in an operation against the subject of a sensitive investigation.”

Another FBI payment request document for $25,000 – dated Sept. 6, 2016 – was also for work “MITCH” had done from early to mid-September 2016. Somma said that it was “payment for services rendered on the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE / CROSSFIRE TYPHOON investigation.”

The previously unseen FBI records also include payment receipts signed by “Mitch” for $5,000 in August 2016 and $15,000 and $25,000 in August and September 2016.  Another FBI payment request document for $25,000 – dated January 5, 2017 – related to services Halper rendered from November 2016 to early January 2017. It included a signature by “Mitch” for receiving $25,000 from the FBI in February 2017 and was “payment for services rendered by the CHS during the captioned investigation.”

The FBI's confidential human source validation unit revealed that “FBI NY has paid MITCH $1,181,064.44 dating back to 1991.”

Despite the efforts by the FBI and Halper, a two-year investigation by Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller “did not establish” any criminal Trump-Russia collusion. In addition, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz found huge flaws with the FBI’s investigation, including criticizing the “central and essential” role of a dossier in the FBI’s politicized surveillance of former Trump campaign associate Carter Page.

Halper — and the FBI — target Mike Flynn
At Cambridge University, Halper worked alongside MI6’s Sir Richard Dearlove and MI5 historian Christopher Andrew. Together, they founded and organized Cambridge Intelligence Seminars, including one in 2014 attended by Flynn.

CHS reports show Halper, an academic who long worked for the bureau as a trusted informant, was the original source of a story that Flynn had left a 2014 event in Cambridge, England, with the Russia scholar Svetlana Lokhova while he was still the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. It was also listed in FBI documents as part of the reason the bureau opened a counterintelligence probe of Flynn. The story was later leaked to the news media and became the focal point of a defamation lawsuit by Lokhova that was dismissed and affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

By January 2017, as Trump was about to take office, the FBI had exhausted all leads in the Flynn case, and the agents were prepared to shut down the probe, but they were overruled by superiors.

The FBI memos show Halper offered the Lokhova story during his first Russia collusion debriefing on Aug. 11, 2016, shortly after Donald Trump had accepted the Republican presidential nomination and days before the bureau opened an investigation codenamed Crossfire Razor focused on whether Flynn was wittingly or unwittingly aiding Moscow.

A number of “CHS Reporting Documents” from 2016 which were submitted by FBI special agent Stephem Somma showed that Somma repeatedly met Halper with Special Agent Benjamin Gessford and a yet-redacted Staff Operations Specialist (SOS).

"The CHS relayed an incident s/he witnessed when CROSSFIRE RAZOR (CR) spoke at the university. The CHS was unsure of the date, but noted that CR was still in his/her position within the USIC," the informant's report relayed to the bureau. Redactions that have now been lifted include a “writer’s note” that Flynn had spoken there on February 28, 2014.

"The CHS told the team that after CR spoke and socialized with [redacted] at dinner and over drinks, [redacted] got CR a cab to take CR to the train station to bring him/her to London,” the FBI records originally said, although the less-redacted version shows Halper claimed Flynn had socialized with university members and that it was university members who got him his car.

The event Flynn attended in 2014 was part of the Cambridge Intelligence Seminars.

"The CHS stated that a woman, Svetlana Lokhova, surprised everyone and got into CR's cab and joined CR on the train ride to London," the more heavily-redacted version of the report had added, with Halper claiming Lokhova had “latched” onto Flynn while at a redacted location, which is now known to have been Halper’s university.

"The CHS stated that s/he is somewhat suspicious of Lokhova as she has been affiliated with several prominent members of [redacted],” the original FBI record stated. The redaction there was that Halper said Lokhova was affiliated with prominent members of Halper’s university. “CHS believes that Lokhova's father may be a Russian oligarch living in London."

Lokhova connection unsubstantiated
One day later – Aug. 12, 2016 – the FBI brought Halper back for more debriefings and pressed him "to recall the incident" involving Lokhova. The memos suggest agents were clearly concerned by the allegation that a DIA director and three-star general was somehow unaccompanied on a foreign trip.

"The CHS was asked if s/he recalled if CR was alone during the presentation at the university or if CR was joined by a staff officer," the report said. "The CHS did not remember another officer with CR, but said that there was a representative from CR's organization there from a local military base."

Four days later – on Aug. 16, 2016 – documents show the FBI formally opened a counterintelligence investigation into Flynn as part of the Crossfire Hurricane probe into the now-disproven allegations of Trump-Russia collusion.

The documents make clear that Halper's allegations about the Lokhova encounter were included in the Flynn probe, and that the FBI checked U.S. and foreign intelligence databases on the Russian-born academic and "reported no derogatory information in its holdings." A former bureau official told Just the News, the FBI was favorably familiar with Lokhova because she had been cleared to work with the bureau's official historian while researching a book on Soviet-era spying.

The records state that early on agents asked Halper if he might "be able to meet with CR as part of the CHS' due diligence" and create "another opportunity for the CHS to address the [Russian Federation] ties to the Trump campaign." There is no evidence in the memos that Halper was able to meet with Flynn during the probe.

FBI agent William Barnett said agents checked Halper's claims of the Lokhova encounter with U.S. and foreign intelligence officials and came up empty. "Intelligence analysts did not locate information to corroborate this reporting," Barnett told prosecutors.

"BARNETT found the idea Flynn could leave an event, either by himself or [redacted] without the matter being noted as not plausible," the summary of the agent's interview stated. "With nothing to corroborate the story, Barnett thought the information was not accurate."

Barnett spoke with Justice Department investigators in 2020 and said Halper’s claims about Flynn were “potentially significant and something that could be investigated.” At the same time, the DOJ document said, “intelligence analysts did not locate information to corroborate” Halper’s allegations, and Barnett found the claims “not plausible.”

In a January 2017 document proposing the Flynn case close, the FBI recounted Halper’s claims and said the FBI “checked [redacted] name through available FBI databases for any derogatory information with negative results,” and “a formal [redacted] was submitted to [redacted] for any derogatory information.” The document stated that “[redacted] reported no derogatory information in its holdings.”

Since-fired special agent Peter Strzok stopped the FBI from closing its investigation into Flynn in early 2017.

Lokhova argued in her 2019 lawsuit against that Halper that he “embroiled an innocent woman in a conspiracy to undo the 2016 presidential election.” Halper through his lawyers scoffed at the claims as “meritless and profane” and “implausible conspiracy theories.”

In his debriefings as a cooperating witness with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Flynn also directly knocked down any suggestion of an untoward encounter with Lokhova as "ridiculous."

Flynn "did not have any other interaction with her during that trip, or on any other occasion," Flynn told prosecutors, according to an FBI report of the interview, and said he “walked back to the school’s hotel” after the dinner.

New details on the FBI’s relationship with Halper
The declassification move by Trump and Patel this week follows an executive order by the president in March, after his prior efforts to declassify the FBI’s Russiagate scandal records in the final days of his first term were thwarted by his own Justice Department in January 2021. It also comes after the Biden-era DOJ and the FBI under ex-Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director Christopher Wray each refused for four years to make the records public.

The FBI’s investigation targeting both the candidate and then-President Trump in 2016 and beyond began with ginned-up allegations of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, but Crossfire Hurricane was soon exposed as a ”Deep State” plot by politicized intelligence and law enforcement agencies to target Trump.

The newly-declassified FBI records provide further details on Halper’s relationship with the FBI.

The newly-released FBI documents said Somma and Gessford “met with the CHS regarding CROSSFIRE HURRICANE targets.” A document about the Aug. 16, 2016 meeting said Somma and Gessford met with Halper and “CHS was prepped for an operation regarding the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE investigation.”

Another FBI document – dated Sept. 5, 2016 – said Somma and Gessford met with Halper a few days prior, but that “due to the sensitivity of the investigation, the write-up is in the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE file.”

And another FBI document – dated Feb. 27, 2017 – detailed a Jan. 25, 2017 meeting between Somma and Halper at the Sofitel Hotel in the nation’s capital, where Halper was meeting with the subject of an investigation.

Another document from the bureau dated the same day detailed a meeting in Virginia on February 1, 2017, where “CHS discussed potential operations against the target of the investigation” and where Somma “also presented the CHS with $25,000 for CHS services.”

The newly-disclosed FBI documents – one dated Mar. 1, 2017 and detailing a meeting which happened that day in Virginia – stated that “CHS informed SA Somma that he had been contacted by a reporter at the Wall Street Journal regarding Russian Influence at the CHS’s university. The reporter was following up on an article written earlier in the year about the same subject.”

A quarterly FBI report from June 2017 said Halper was “unavailable” during the recent timeframe and that the FBI didn’t have contact with him during the previous few months. Another quarterly FBI report from October 2020 said that “no statistical accomplishments have been claimed for this period” and that Halper was “being closed” as a source “at the direction of FBI HQ-Counterintelligence Division.”

Halper and Carter Page
The FBI’s Halper memos also show that, immediately after the FBI opened a Russia collusion probe at the end of July 2016, FBI agents pressed Halper for information on more than a half dozen Trump world figures, including Carter Page.

An FBI document from August 2016 shows Halper said he’d be willing to help the FBI with targeting Papadopoulos but, in a newly unredacted sentence, said that he wanted to meet with Papadopoulos first because, without knowing Papadopoulos, he worried Papadopoulos could be “thrown to the wolves” at his university.

"The main goal of the operation is to have CD [CROSSFIRE DRAGON / Carter Page] admit that he has direct knowledge of and is either helping coordinate or assisting the RF [Russian Federation] conduct an active measure campaign with the 'Trump Team,'" stated an Aug. 24, 2016 report detailing the FBI's interactions with Halper that week.

If the Page operation failed, the FBI "team would then change its posture and move forward with an operation against CROSSFIRE TYPHOON," the memos stated.

British ex-spy Christopher Steele had been hired by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS to conduct his baseless anti-Trump research dossier, and Fusion GPS in turn had been hired by Clinton’s 2016 campaign by now ex-Perkins Coie lawyer Marc Elias.

A slightly less declassified version of the fourth FISA application against Page— released in January 2021 to Just the News — stated that Page, during his interaction with Halper, did not offer a direct rebuttal to claims he had met with senior Russians or played a role in changing the GOP platform to make it more favorable to Russia as alleged by Steele.

"On or about October 17, 2016, Page met with Source #2, which meeting the FBI consensually monitored and recorded," the FISA application read. "According to the FBI's review of the recorded conversation, Source #2 made general inquiries about the media reporting regarding Page's contacts with Russian officials.”

"Although Page did not provide any specific details to refute, dispel, or clarify the media reporting, he made vague statements that minimized his activities. Page also made general statements about a perceived conspiracy against him mounted by the media," the FBI told the court.

But the transcript of Page's conversation with Halper, also declassified and obtained by Just the News in January 2021, showed that Page did in fact directly deny all four of the main allegations made about him in the Steele dossier that supported the FISA application, including specific denials he had met with two Russian officials named Igor Sechin and Igor Diveychkin.

An unredacted “writer’s note” from the FBI in August 2016 says the bureau believed a July 2016 meeting between Halper and Page occurred on July 13, 2016, because that was the date Page left the UK and flew to the United States, according to an FBI records check.

FBI documents now also reveal the FBI was present on Halper’s property to monitor the conversation with Page.

Kevin Clinesmith, who worked on both the Hillary Clinton emails investigation and the Trump-Russia inquiry, pleaded guilty to falsifying a document during the bureau’s efforts to renew FISA authority to wiretap Carter Page, who was an adviser to President Trump's 2016 campaign.

Clinesmith admitted in August 2020 that he had falsely edited a CIA email in 2017 to state that Carter Page was “not a source” for the CIA when the agency had actually told the bureau on multiple occasions that Page had been an “operational contact” for the CIA. Horowitz said the third renewal application “again failed to disclose Page's past relationship with the other agency” because of Clinesmith’s actions. Clinesmith was not named in Horowitz's report, but it was clear he was the "Office of General Counsel attorney" who had been working with the Crossfire Hurricane team.

"The core lie is that I met with these sanctioned Russian officials, several of which I never even met in my entire life, but they said that I met them in July," the FBI transcript quotes Page as telling Halper during the Oct. 17, 2016 interaction at Halper's farm in northern Virginia.

Page was never charged with a crime as part of Mueller's investigation, which failed to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, and Page has repeatedly denied being an agent for Russia.

The memos showed Halper followed FBI instructions and helped the FBI make recordings that clearly captured Page — unaware he was talking to an FBI informant — actually denying the key allegations against him. On the recordings, Page said that he had not met with two sanctioned Russians as Steele had alleged, that he had not played a role in modifying the Republican National Committee’s 2016 platform to help Russia, and that he was not involved with or aware of any effort by the Trump campaign to work with Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails.

Horowitz’s report made clear the conversation between Halper and Page took place on Oct. 17, 2016, or four days before the FISA warrant was approved by the FISA Court authorizing surveillance of Page, but these denials were never disclosed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that approved a year of surveillance targeting the Trump campaign, and specifically Page.

Judge Rosemary Collyer, then the presiding judge over the FISA court, in December 2019 ordered an FBI review of every FISA filing that Clinesmith had ever touched following the release of Horowitz’s report that month on Crossfire Hurricane. The FISA court criticized the FBI’s handling of the Page applications as “antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above” and demanded corrective action from the bureau.

Halper’s “Friend” Peter Navarro
The declassified FBI documents on Halper shed some light on how the FBI source may have come close to getting a job in the first Trump White House despite quietly helping the FBI spy on Trump’s campaign.

The first August 2016 document detailing Halper’s meeting with the FBI shows the FBI had previously redacted the fact that Halper had called Peter Navarro a “friend.” Navarro was a trade advisor in Trump’s first term as well. The next day in August 2016, the FBI wrote that Halper considered contacting Navarro: “The CHS told the team that s/he was thinking of contacting Peter Navarro to inquire about the Trump campaign. The CHS mentioned that Navarro had approached her/him about joining the campaign in the past and that the CHS would be able to ask Navarro direct questions as well, since they are personal friends.”

The FBI records of a Halper meeting on Aug. 24, 2016 about an “Operational Plan for a CHS to meet with Crossfire Dragon” also now include unredacted details about the “CD/FBI CHS relationship” including Halper’s claim that he had been asked to join several recent U.S. presidential campaigns but had declined.

It was reported by Axios in 2018 that, during the presidential transition after the 2016 election, “Navarro recommended Halper, among other people, for ambassador roles in Asia.” A White House official also told the outlet that “Halper visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building last August [2017] for a meeting about China.” Halper was never hired by Trump.

Navarro told Fox News at the time that he was “dumbfounded” by Halper’s role in helping the FBI target Trump and that he felt “duped” by him: “I’ve met him a couple of times. He was in my film documentary. … He is quite eloquent. I just call him up and said want to do it. I went out to his place with my film crew. We shot it and then I subsequently saw him on two other occasions but that’s it. … I feel duped, yeah pretty much.”

Despite efforts by the FBI and Halper to dig up evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, it never emerged.

A report by a new Justice Department special counsel, John Durham, concluded that “neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”

The special counsel also said the "FBI ignored the fact that at no time before, during, or after Crossfire Hurricane were investigators able to corroborate a single substantive allegation in the Steele dossier reporting.”

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fbi-kept-defending-crossfire-hurricanes-stefan-halper-after-his-mike?utm_medium=social_media&utm_source=facebook_social_icon&utm_campaign=social_icons


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20468
    • View Profile
Speaking of apparent/alleged FBI dishonesty
« Reply #173 on: April 17, 2025, 06:45:24 AM »
After watching Josh's Expedition Unknown ( great show for those fascinated by archaeology and myths and legends and mysteries

I do think the evidence very compelling the FBI lied coverup and refuse to release their files on possible lost Civil War gold buried near the time of the battle of Gettysburg and then lost in 1863.  It was reportedly a shipment of gold sent to the Philadelphia mint that disappeared along the way:

 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-civil-war-gold-pennsylvania-dents-run/

Annoying that all the FBI has to do to conceal what they are doing is stamp something as "classified" and then they can hide, cover up or make disappear their records.

I would love to see Bondi force FBI to open up this file.  There is NOTHING I can imagine that should make this classified except the deception , lies and trickery of the FBI would embarrass the bureau and expose their lies.

We the public have a right to know.  It true they found gold they literally cheated the finder out of some reward which would certainly be justly earned in my mind.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20270
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: April 18, 2025, 02:02:37 PM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3843
    • View Profile
Ye gods, this one has it all: Boasberg, Clinesmith, Strzok, Page, Hillary, Comey, et al:

Convicted FBI lawyer spared from prison by Boasberg far more involved in Russia probe than known

The judge who has emerged as a top foe of Trump's deportation efforts previously let a well-known Trump-Russia collusion hoax proponent off the hook. But newly-declassified Crossfire Hurricane records show the FBI's Kevin Clinesmith was deeply involved in in the bogus Russiagate saga.

Convicted FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith — whom Judge James Boasberg gave a slap on the wrist for his crimes years before becoming a public foe of President Donald Trump’s deportation policies — was more deeply involved in the deeply flawed Crossfire Hurricane investigation than previously known.

Clinesmith, who worked on both the FBI’s Hillary Clinton email investigation and on the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, pleaded guilty to falsifying a document during the bureau’s efforts to renew FISA authority to wiretap Carter Page, who was an adviser to Trump's 2016 campaign.

Newly-declassified details about Clinesmith’s involvement include a wide swath of information about his role in the case. He was a key go-to for former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok throughout the debunked collusion saga and a main driver in obtaining a FISA warrant against Page based on the infamous Steele dossier.

Clinesmith also granted his seal of approval on a document describing the FBI’s pretextual briefing of then-candidate Trump, was deeply involved in the investigation into retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, played a role in going after former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, and more. He also helped the FBI push its  “Cross Wind” investigation, which Just the News can confirm related to the targeting of security expert Walid Phares, which resulted in no accusations of wrongdoing and no charges.

Knee-deep in the mud
Clinesmith confessed in August 2020 that he had manipulated a CIA email in 2017 to state that Carter Page was “not a source” for the CIA when that agency had actually told the bureau on multiple occasions that Page was in fact an “operational contact” for the CIA.

Boasberg, the federal judge who is blocking Trump’s efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members, also played a key and controversial role in the aftermath of the Trump-Russia collusion saga as the leader of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The judge, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by then-President Barack Obama in 2011, is currently engaged in an all-out legal battle with the Trump Justice Department.

But in his role as the head of the FISA Court he made a number of divisive decisions, including a slap on the wrist for a member of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team, the appointment of officials who had defended the FBI’s actions during the Russiagate saga, the renewal of the FBI’s FISA powers, and more.

Boasberg defends Clinesmith
Boasberg ruled this week that “probable cause exists” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt after they violated his orders by continuing deportation flights. But his ruling follows the Supreme Court holding that Boasberg's court was in an improper venue for the case altogether.

Boasberg, in his role as a federal judge, denied the Justice Department’s efforts to seek up to six months behind bars for Clinesmith, who pleaded guilty in Special Counsel John Durham’s Trump-Russia investigation — instead giving Clinesmith a year of probation, 400 hours of community service, and no fine.

Durham argued that Clinesmith’s “deceptive conduct” related to the FISA application fabrication “was antithetical to the duty of candor and eroded the FISA’s confidence in the accuracy of all previous FISA applications worked on by the defendant,” and said his deception “fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.”

But Boasberg seemed to defend Clinesmith’s deceptive FISA-related actions during his January 2021 sentencing.

"Mr. Clinesmith likely believed that what he said was true," Boasberg wrote, adding, "I do not believe he was attempting to achieve an end he knew was wrong." The judge claimed that "it is not clear to me that the fourth FISA warrant would not have been signed but for this error. … Even if Mr. Clinesmith had been accurate about Mr. Page’s relationship with the other government agency, the warrant may well have been signed and the surveillance authorized."

Durham had argued that Clinesmith's deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.” Anthony Scarpelli, then a top prosecutor on Durham’s team, also argued that “the defendant’s criminal conduct tarnished the integrity of the FISA program” and that “the resulting harm is immeasurable.”

Clinesmith told the court that “I am deeply remorseful for any effect my actions may have had” on the FISA process even as he claimed that “I never intended to mislead my colleagues about the status of Dr. Page.”

But Boasberg lamented that Clinesmith had been “abused” and “vilified” on a “national scale” when the judge handed down his sentence, though he did acknowledge that the FISA court’s reputation “has suffered” from the ex-FBI attorney’s actions.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz in 2019 found huge flaws with the FBI’s Russia collusion investigation, finding at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the FISA warrants against former Trump campaign associate Carter Page. He also criticized the “central and essential” role of British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s debunked dossier in the FBI’s politicized FISA surveillance. Clinesmith reportedly circulated the dossier to other law enforcement staff.

FBI notes of a January 2017 interview with Steele source Igor Danchenko showed he told the bureau he “did not know the origins” of some of Steele's claims and “did not recall” other dossier information. Danchenko also noted much of what he gave to Steele was “word of mouth and hearsay,” some of which stemmed from a “conversation that [he] had with friends over beers,” and the most salacious allegations may have been made in “jest.”

The special counsel assessed that “the FBI ignored the fact that at no time before, during, or after Crossfire Hurricane were investigators able to corroborate a single substantive allegation in the Steele dossier reporting.”

The new revelations about Clinesmith come partly through further declassified text messages sent by Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and others involved in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

Boasberg did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News sent to his office. Clinesmith did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News which was sent to the lawyer who defended him in the Durham case.

Collaboration on the Carter Page FISA
The newly-declassified FBI records show that Clinesmith messaged Lisa Page that “we have the final draft of the DRAGON FISA” on Oct. 11, 2016 — using the “Crossfire Dragon” codename for Carter Page. Clinesmith and Lisa Page then strategized about how to get the FISA approved as quickly as possible. Lisa Page said that “I can call [Comey chief of staff Jim] Rybicki, ask him to check in with the D [Director Comey].” Clinesmith replied, “If you think that’s acceptable, it might be a good thing to do; that would help us get it to the FISC [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] more quickly.”

Amidst the push to use the Steele dossier in the Carter Page FISA and to get the FISA approved, Strzok sent a message to since-fired FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe two days later saying, “We got [Steele] reporting on September 19. Looks like Gaeta got it in August. Looking at Clinesmith’s Lync messages to me it’s not clear if he knows if/when he told them.” Steele’s longtime FBI handler was Michael Gaeta.

The Durham report concluded that “The delayed dissemination within the FBI of the sensational information contained in the Steele Reports is both perplexing and troubling. Indeed, the failure of recollection by FBI personnel concerning the matter certainly raises the question of whether the FBI had misgivings from the start about the provenance and reliability of the Steele Reports. Nevertheless, within two days of their eventual receipt by the Crossfire Hurricane team, information from four of the Steele Reports were being used to support probable cause in the initial FISA application on Carter Page.”

Clinesmith and Lisa Page then exchanged a series of messages on October 20, 2016.

Lisa Page asked Clinesmith if it was signed yet, and Clinesmith told her it was over at the Justice Department to be signed by FBI and DOJ leadership, saying, “Court has given comments. Waiting for next word.” Lisa Page told Clinesmith, “Thanks for all your crazy work — if we get it, it’s a huge testament to your effort.” Clinesmith commented that “it’s been an adventure” and Lisa Page replied, “Yeah, that’s one way to put it.”

Strzok asked FBI lawyer Sally Moyer “what facilities are we covering for Dragon?” on March 1, 2017. Strzok then messaged Clinesmith that “I needed Dragon facilities but I got them from [REDACTED].”

Clinesmith altered docs, hid information from FISA court
Horowitz said the third renewal application against Carter Page “again failed to disclose Carter Page's past relationship with the other agency” because of Clinesmith’s actions.

"Supervisory Special Agent 2" — who swore to an affidavit for all three FISA renewals against Page in 2017 — told Horowitz's investigators that on the third renewal he wanted "a definitive answer to whether Page had ever been a source for another U.S. government agency before he signed the final renewal application."

While in contact with the CIA's liaison, Clinesmith was reminded that back in August 2016, predating the first Page warrant application in October 2016, the CIA informed the FBI that Page "did, in fact, have a prior relationship with that other agency [the CIA]."

An email from the CIA’s liaison was sent to Clinesmith, who then "altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it, thus making it appear that the liaison had said that Page was 'not a source' for the other agency" and then sent it to "Supervisory Special Agent 2," Horowitz found.

Judge Rosemary Collyer, then the presiding judge over the FISA court, in December 2019 ordered an FBI review of every FISA filing that Clinesmith had ever touched following the release of Horowitz’s report that month on Crossfire Hurricane. The FISA court criticized the FBI’s handling of the Page applications as “antithetical to the heightened duty of candor” and demanded corrective action from the bureau.

Sign off on doc detailing pretextual briefing of Trump
​​Republicans have long pointed to a double standard in how FBI defensive briefings were used in high-profile cases involving political figures. Hillary Clinton received a defensive briefing on efforts by Turkey to influence her, and defensive briefings were also given to Rep. Eric Swalwell and then-Sen. Dianne Feinstein about their close ties to suspected Chinese agents, which effectively ended the FBI’s criminal or counterintelligence investigations.

The FBI’s first intelligence briefing of then-candidate Trump in August 2016 at its New York field office was used as a “pretext” to gather evidence on him and on then-foreign policy adviser Flynn, according to 2019 testimony from Horowitz. FBI official Joseph Pientka conducted the briefing and would later accompany Strzok to interview Flynn in January 2017.

“They sent a supervisory agent to the briefing from the Crossfire Hurricane team, and that agent prepared a report to the file of the briefing about what Mr. Trump and Mr. Flynn said,” Horowitz previously testified. “So the agent was actually doing the briefing but also using it for the purpose of investigation.”

The pretextual meeting targeting Trump and Flynn was detailed in an FBI record titled “Document Brief to Republican Candidate for U.S. President.” It is now known that it was “drafted” by Pientka and was “approved” by “KEVIN E. CLINESMITH” and “STRZOK PETER.”

Pientka had messaged Strzok on Aug. 28, using the “RAZOR” codename for Flynn and saying, “Thoughts from you regarding what I write up if anything regarding the CI brief I gave? Assessment on RAZOR as he is a subject, but leave the other two out other than I provided a CI [counterintelligence] brief? I think it prudent to document what I said and admonished them of… especially if any of the classified is ever on CNN, debate, etc.”

Strzok told Pientka, “Def let’s write up. I think an EC [electronic communication] should be OK. Do you envision anything testimonial in there? If Sally or Kevin have strong opinions I’d defer to them.” It was “Kevin” who would document the politicized briefing.

Clinesmith Targets Flynn
The newly declassified FBI records show Clinesmith’s deep involvement in the FBI’s efforts to target Flynn.

“Hey heads up per [REDACTED] WH is rips*t about leak of contents of call between P and foreign counterpart and are urgently asking for process for media leak referral,” Strzok told FBI colleagues on Feb. 1, 2017. “To the extent we have people sharing information of this nature with us, we need to be very cautious about it. Including caution about reaching out to them now. Think about it now, let’s discuss later.”

An FBI official whose name was redacted from the documents replied, “I’m not. I just talked to Kevin and he said he heard they were concerned about leaks of the transcripts from calls with Mexico and Australia.” Strzok replied, “He gave me a different presentation of the facts.”

Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were leaked to the media in early 2017. Republicans have alleged since 2017 that Obama-era officials improperly unmasked associates of then-candidate Donald Trump’s presidential campaign during the Russia collusion investigation, while Democrats have defended the intelligence-gathering process.

A Washington Post column in mid-January 2017 contained classified details that set off a media frenzy. Citing an unnamed “senior U.S. government official,” it said Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak spoke on the phone in December 2016, the day former President Barack Obama announced actions against Russia, and suggested Flynn had violated the Logan Act.

Leaks and unmasking
A follow-up article by the Washington Post in early February 2017 revealed classified details from Flynn’s monitored calls with Kislyak, citing “nine current and former officials” in “senior positions at multiple agencies.”

John Bash, ​​the U.S. attorney tasked in 2020 with investigating the “unmasking” scandal, concluded that Flynn’s name had not even been hidden to begin with when the FBI shared information across the Obama administration.

The content and transcripts of Trump’s phone calls with the leaders of Mexico and Australia were also leaked to the media in 2017.

A redacted FBI official told Strzok that another redacted FBI official had “managed to piss off” Flynn. Strzok asked what the other FBI official had done, and the first FBI official said that “Flynn expected the brief and was told it wouldn’t happen because of Kevin.” The names of both FBI officials remain redacted.

Strzok told Lisa Page, “Just thinking he might have not (or been afraid) to tell Flynn… Told Kevin in no uncertain terms the FBI had done everything it could and was waiting on WH before we could do anything else.”

"Out to get Trump"
The declassified Strzok texts document also includes a message which says, “Just heard from Kevin, he said he went ‘up to Flynn’s office’ and was unable to get validation of either the brief or the EO [executive order]” on Feb. 8, 2017.

William Barnett, the FBI agent who handled Flynn’s case in 2016 and 2017, called the Trump-Russia investigation “Collusion Clue” and argued many investigators were out to “get Trump.”

The FBI summary stated that “while Barnett questioned the investigative theory, he did not think at the time the investigation was illegal, particularly due to the oversight by attorneys (i.e., CLINESMITH) and the direction being given by top FBI officials.” Barnett said he “was willing to follow instructions being given by the Deputy Director as long as it was not a violation of law.”

Barnett said Clinesmith physically walked National Security Letter requests on Flynn to get approval.

Top FBI officials discussed the possibility of prosecuting Flynn for lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russians while agents planned how to conduct their January 2017 interview of the Trump national security adviser, bureau notes show.

“I agreed yesterday that we shouldn’t show Flynn [REDACTED] if he didn’t admit” but “I thought about it last night and I believe we should rethink this,” Bill Priestap, the FBI’s head of counterintelligence, wrote in January 2017. “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

Steele Dossier dissemination
The newly-declassified documents also now show a few new details about how the Steele dossier and Steele’s false claims were circulated inside the FBI, and Clinesmith’s name has now been unredacted as having been a recipient in roughly a dozen emails in December 2016 related to the Steele dossier.

Just the News obtained in 2021 internal FBI emails discussing the Steele dossier. These emails were sent between FBI agents such as Strzok, Moffa, and at least 13 FBI officials whose names were redacted. The newly declassified version removes the redactions on many of the FBI officials who were sending and receiving dossier updates.

The FBI emails from December 2016 include an FBI official with the Washington Field Office sending an email to Strzok, Moffa, and roughly a dozen FBI officials discussing a thumb drive provided by former DOJ official Bruce Ohr. The email includes a “tracking matrix” on the receipt of Steele dossier reports, including from Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson. Clinesmith is now known to have been a recipient of those emails.

Marc Elias, a former Perkins Coie lawyer who served as general counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, played a key role in the funding and spreading of Steele’s phony dossier. He hired the opposition firm Fusion GPS, which, in turn, hired Steele.

Another email in December 2016 is now known to have been sent by Pientka and received by Clinesmith. It was known it had said: “As many of you know we obtained a USB drive from Glenn Simpson via a DOJ colleague. We are handling as evidence and a working copy is in the share drive where we have historically kept CROWN reporting, the folder labeled [REDACTED] Reporting, sub folder Simpson 121216.”

The FBI documents also include a spreadsheet laying out how Steele dossier reports had been injected into the FBI. The columns in the spreadsheet included Steele to the FBI, leftwing journalist David Corn to the FBI, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson to the FBI, former Republican Sen. John McCain to the FBI, the version published by BuzzFeed, and [REDACTED]. The redacted column label now says “[FGI”] — indicating Steele dossier reports were sent to the bureau by a yet-unrevealed foreign government.

“I just uploaded to our share drive the documents and files that Bruce Ohr’s wife (through Bruce) voluntarily provided to the FBI this morning,” another December 2016 email now known to have been received by Clinesmith states. “They are reports/work she completed for Fusion GPS/Glenn Simpson (similar to the one she gave us on Manafort last week). They are under the Fusion GPS file on the share drive. Please review (there are approx 85 docs...) and once we have a grasp of what's on there I can submit to the appropriate case files.”

The Durham report concluded that “the FISA on Carter Page would not have been authorized without the Steele reporting.”

Clinesmith and Papadopoulos
Newly-declassified records show Clinesmith was also involved in the investigation into George Papadopoulos.

FBI agent Michael Varacalli messaged Strzok at the start of February 2017 to say that “CG is reaching out to TYPHOON via phone to try to get a one-on-one meet. If he wants to meet us with an attorney present, we may send Sally or Kevin tomorrow to join Curtis in any interview.” The FBI agent used the “TYPHOON” codename for Papadopoulos. Strzok soon sent Lisa Page a message that “they’re talking to Typhoon now, without an atty [attorney].”

Varacalli sent another message to Strzok that day asking, “Did you get the TYPHOON update from them when you spoke to [REDACTED]/Kevin?”

“Hey I have some more info re Typhoon interview,” Moyer told Strzok on Mar. 27, 2017. “After the call from Typhoon on Friday, DOJ (Brandon van Grack) and EDVA [Eastern District of Virginia] asked Kevin to reach out to Typhoon’s attorney. They don’t want their participation known yet.”

Strzok claimed in his 2020 book, Compromised, that Australian diplomat Alexander Downer was spurred to inform the U.S. government about a May 2016 conversation he had in London with Papadopoulos (in which the Trump campaign associate allegedly mentioned Russia might have information on Clinton) only after hearing then-candidate Trump say in July 2016: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails.”

Mueller and Horowitz concluded Australia actually informed the United States of the Papadopoulos conversation on July 26, 2016. Trump made the comment about Russia the day after — not before.

Strzok also seemed to make that claim in March 2017 when briefing Justice Department and FBI officials about the Trump-Russia investigation. Strzok admitted in September 2020 he had gotten that detail wrong in his book, though he downplayed it.

Strzok establishes a pattern of untruths
Handwritten notes labeled as by Tashina Gauhar, then the associate deputy attorney general, indicate Strzok made the same misleading claim about Trump’s remarks, prompting the Australian to reach out to the FBI when briefing then-acting Attorney General Dana Boente and others on March 6, 2017.

The “opening electronic communication” for Crossfire Hurricane was authored by Strzok and authorized by Priestap at the end of July 2016. The FBI didn’t formally interview Papadopoulos until January 2017.

Durham’s report in 2023 concluded that “the matter was opened as a full investigation without ever having spoken to the persons who provided the information” and that the FBI launched this Trump-Russia investigation without “any significant review of its own intelligence databases” and without “collection and examination of any relevant intelligence from other U.S. intelligence entities.” The investigation was also launched without conducting any interviews of “witnesses essential to understand the raw information” the FBI had received, as well as without using “any of the standard analytical tools typically employed by the FBI in evaluating raw intelligence.”

The Durham report asserted that if the bureau had taken these basic steps, “the FBI would have learned that their own experienced Russia analysts had no information about Trump being involved with Russian leadership officials, nor were others in sensitive positions at the CIA, the NSA, and the Department of State aware of such evidence concerning the subject.”

“Cross Wind”
Clinesmith was also involved in Crossfire Hurricane’s mysterious “Cross Wind” investigation.

“Talked to Pete,” Clinesmith told Lisa Page on May 17, 2017. “Will proceed accordingly. We also have the special FISA package for the D today. Just need to coordinate handing that off for signature at some point.” Lisa Page responded to Clinesmith, “Okay, that’s easy enough. He should be available around 2 to sign that.”

The same day, Clinesmith asked Lisa Page, “Is there time tomorrow, say 3PM or after, that you can schedule a signing for Cross Wind with the Acting Director? It appears the field is still finalizing it today.” Lisa Page replied, “Totally doable. Let’s talk later.”

Amidst a discussion about Flynn and “CROWN” on June 29, 2017, Moyer told Strzok, “Well presumably we should be sharing these results with the entire CW [Cross Wind] team. But for right now we need Kevin [REDACTED].”

A message in the declassified Strzok texts also shows a request to “call me about wind please” on May 16, 2017. And a discussion within the Strzok texts also shows a discussion about “wind” on June 2, 2017. The FBI officials discussed a meeting scheduled for the next day with the FBI leadership, and they weren’t sure if it was about “Razor” — Flynn — or about “Wind.” One of the FBI agents said that “I heard wind.” And another one of the FBI agents also said, “Wait, I forget the codename. Oh yes, Wind.”

Trump ally and national security expert Walid Phares was codenamed “Cross Wind” by the FBI, Just the News can confirm.

Phares confirmed to Just the News in 2020 that he had been investigated by the FBI and Mueller related to Egypt. The allegation — like many in the Russia case — turned out to be spurious, and Phares was never charged with wrongdoing by Mueller’s team. Phares argued in 2020 that “the push against the Trump campaign, and then the transition, and then the administration was on behalf of those who wanted to defend the Iran deal” struck by the Obama administration.

Phares told Just the News this week that multiple sources, including congressional sources, had told him that “Cross Wind” was the code name the FBI had used for him, but that neither the FBI nor the Mueller team had ever told him that. Phares said it remains unclear what exactly the Mueller team and the FBI had wanted with him — he said he was told it was not related to Russia, and that they asked him questions about the Trump campaign and Egypt, but they never even said he was a target of the investigation.

“Nothing ever came of it,” Phares said.

A source familiar with the FBI's investigation also confirmed with Just the News that the FBI's scrutiny of Phares was codenamed "Cross Wind."

Phares said in 2020 that one of the events that landed him in the bullseye of the Russia probe occurred in September 2016, when Trump met with the Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who ousted the Muslim Brotherhood from its brief reign of power in Cairo after a popular uprising.

The meeting was actually set up by others, but the Egyptians reached out to Phares, who was advising Trump at the time on Middle East issues, and he encouraged them to meet Trump, Phares said. Sisi actually met Trump and Hillary Clinton on the same day in New York. Phares didn’t attend those meetings.

A year later, Phares said he suddenly got a knock on his door from FBI agents working for Mueller’s probe. He was questioned several times by agents and prosecutors, as well as by House and Senate investigators. No charges were ever filed against him.

Multiple sources with direct knowledge previously told Just the News that U.S. intelligence during the Obama-Trump transition received allegations suggesting Phares may have accepted money or been acting as an unregistered lobbyist for Egyptians trying to gain influence with Trump. The uncorroborated allegations were eventually put into the scope memo signed in August 2017 by then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that set the parameters for the work that Mueller’s team was to accomplish.

The New York Times reported in 2020 that “the decision to investigate Mr. Phares was based on highly classified information” and that “investigators examined the matter for months but ultimately brought no charges.”

Phares previously told Just the News that he cooperated as a witness and said he never was threatened with prosecution or confronted with any evidence of wrongdoing.

Clinesmith: "Viva le resistance"
The newly declassified text messages also show how Clinesmith was often the go-to guy for Strzok and Lisa Page. Strzok exchanged numerous anti-Trump texts with Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair.

In Horowitz’s 2018 report on the FBI's politicized Clinton emails investigation, Clinesmith was mentioned multiple times as being one of the FBI officials who conveyed a bias against Trump. In messages exchanged the day after Trump’s November 2016 victory, Clinesmith worried that “my god damned name is all over the legal documents investigating his staff.”

Other messages showed Clinesmith said “Viva le resistance" in the weeks after Trump's win.

Clinesmith appeared to send a “Midyear Exam Final Draft” message to Strzok on August 10, 2016. The same day, Moyer messaged Lisa Page, “Just wanted to follow up on your call with DOS [Department of State] today. Kevin has a 302 [FBI interview] list which I believe we agreed to provide to DOS before we make our production to Congress.”

FBI agent John Robertson, who worked in the bureau’s child sex crimes unit in New York, unearthed tens of thousands of Clinton emails in late September 2016 on the laptop belonging to Clinton associate Huma Abedin’s husband, disgraced former New York congressman Anthony Weiner. But for weeks after being alerted, key FBI leaders — including McCabe, Priestap, and Strzok — took little to no action to investigate how Clinton's emails came to reside on Weiner's laptop, which also may have contained child pornography, according to an FBI report.

Horowitz wrote in 2018, “We did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.”

Strzok wrote in 2020 that “of course” he prioritized the Trump-Russia investigation over the Clinton emails investigation because “there was simply no equivalence between Midyear and Crossfire.”

Other newly-declassified messages show FBI officials like Strzok and Page relying on Clinesmith.

In the Strzok texts document, an FBI official wrote that “I know Clinesmith did the work, but did the task go to [FBI general counsel Jim] Baker [REDACTED]? on Mar. 17, 2017. The same day, an FBI official wrote, “What has you fired up? Her presumption with [REDACTED] about being left out? Wasn’t [REDACTED] aware anyway? Sally was out [REDACTED] had the lead and gave to Kevin?”

The same day, Clinesmith messaged Strzok, “[Other Government Agency redaction] PCU wants to meet with DC Attorneys office tomorrow.”

Comey arranges leaks to media
Also the same day, Lisa Page messaged Pientka, “PS, I’m on the Special Counsel team now. For better or worse, I guess.” She then messaged Clinesmith, “I am listening to CNN essentially read from the Comey memos right now.” Clinesmith told her, “So, this was about that. If you have time I want to tip you off on some things.” — Page asked him to come to her office, and he said he was on his way.

Horowitz released a separate 2019 report focused on Comey’s mishandling of the memos he made about conversations he had with Trump in early 2017, harshly criticizing Comey’s decision to remove those memos from the FBI after he was fired and to provide some contents to a friend to leak to the media. Comey testified to Congress in 2017 that he hoped leaking this information “might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.”

“Comey had several other lawful options available to him to advocate for the appointment of a special counsel, which he told us was his goal in making the disclosure,” Horowitz wrote. “What was not permitted was the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive investigative information, obtained during the course of FBI employment, in order to achieve a personally desired outcome.”

Comey’s efforts were successful in prompting the appointment of Mueller.

“Can you come to the 11 prep with Baker??” Lisa Page messaged Clinesmith on April 5, 2017. “Sally might not make it back from Crossfire in time.”

Strzok also asked, “Hi Kevin, quick question for you — is the term [Other Government Agency redaction]” on June 5, 2017.

Clinesmith also told Strzok in August 2017 that “Judicial Watch sent in a FOIA re: your assignment to SCO [Special Counsel’s Office], just FYI.”

The conservative watchdog engaged in extensive Freedom of Information Act litigation to get its hands on information related to Strzok and his nefarious actions at the FBI and on the Mueller team.

Strzok later asked Clinesmith, “Hi Kevin, can I get whatever we have on a response to [Foreign Government Information redaction] CROWN?” on July 25, 2017. Clinesmith told Strzok, “I will get it to you within the hour.”

McCabe, who worked closely with Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, had signed the June 2017 FISA renewal targeting Carter Page, though he later told Congress he would not have done so if he knew in 2017 what he knew in 2020.

McCabe and Comey had pushed to include the Steele dossier in the body of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment on alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election, but they were thwarted by the NSA and CIA. The dossier was included in an annex to the assessment.

In 2020, the Justice Department declined to pursue criminal charges against McCabe for allegedly lying to investigators about authorizing media disclosures.

Horowitz released a report in 2018 detailing multiple instances in which McCabe “lacked candor” with FBI Director James Comey, FBI investigators, and inspector general investigators about his authorization to leak sensitive information to The Wall Street Journal that revealed the existence of an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

Comey said he did not permit McCabe to tell the media, and Horowitz wrote that McCabe’s actions were “designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of Department leadership” and “violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.”

McCabe denied wrongdoing, and his lawyers declared that “justice has been done” when charges weren’t filed.

The Crossfire docs a profitable venture
Just the News also revealed last week that declassified documents show that Stefan Halper, a key FBI informant in the widely-debunked Russia collusion case, was paid nearly $1.2 million over three decades and was motivated in part by "monetary compensation" — and that he continued snitching for the bureau even after agents concluded he told them an inaccurate story about future Trump National Security Advisor Mike Flynn.

Just the News further revealed last week that the newly-released documents showed that then-NSA director Mike Rogers shot down a Pulitzer Prize award-winning Washington Post article about the baseless Russian collusion investigation.

Declassified footnotes from the Horowitz report said that Steele received a total of $95,000 from the FBI during his time as a confidential human source for the bureau. Newly-declassified records from the FBI reviewed by Just the News show the bureau’s Validation Management Unit assessed in 2017 that Steele had actually received $127,500 in payments from the bureau.

The FBI offered Steele an “incentive” in October 2016 of up to $1 million if he could prove the allegations in his discredited anti-Trump dossier, but the former MI6 agent was unable to back up his claims, according to 2022 court testimony in Durham’s investigation.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/convicted-fbi-lawyer-who-boasberg-let-skate-more-deeply-involved-crossfire?utm_medium=social_media&utm_source=facebook_social_icon&utm_campaign=social_icons