Author Topic: Trump Adminstration 2.0  (Read 2009 times)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Trump Adminstration 2.0
« on: November 06, 2024, 06:05:14 AM »
World Leaders stand ready to work with Trump

https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-reacts-donald-trump-expected-victory-us-election-2024/

“Heartiest congratulations my friend Donald Trump on your historic election victory. As you build on the successes of your previous term, I look forward to renewing our collaboration to further strengthen the India-US Comprehensive Global and Strategic Partnership. Together, let’s work for the betterment of our people and to promote global peace, stability and prosperity,” said the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi
---------------------------
Argentinian President Javier Milei congratulated Trump saying: “Now, Make America Great Again. You know that You can count on Argentina to carry out your task. Success and blessings.”
---------------------------
Dear Donald and Melania Trump,

Congratulations on history’s greatest comeback!

Your historic return to the White House offers a new beginning for America and a powerful recommitment to the great alliance between Israel and America.

This is a huge victory!
 
In true friendship,                                                                                                                                                                     
yours,
Benjamin and Sara Netanyahu
« Last Edit: November 09, 2024, 09:33:41 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Trump 2.0: Navarro: First Hundred Day Challenges & Opportunities
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2024, 04:15:35 AM »
A look at what Trump can and can’t accomplish in his first hundred days in office:

Implementing Trump’s border and trade policy agendas
First 100 days will be crucial in Washington swamp

PETER NAVARRO
NOV 06, 2024
Team,

Spent the final weeks on the Trump bus tour and in rallies with the Boss in Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. The excitement was palpable so the result last night was no surprise.

Here’s my thoughts on what’s next, as published in the Washington Times!

All my best,

Peter

P.S. Please share with a friend and restack!



Subscribe
Share

Implementing Trump’s border and trade policy agendas

Now that Donald Trump has won the historic 2024 election, he will aggressively pursue a policy agenda designed to rapidly fulfill every campaign promise he has made — see my book “The New MAGA Deal” for the 100 actions in 100 days he is likely to take.

Yet, for those who expect an overnight miracle, it is important to understand how the Washington swamp works and why it will seek to block Mr. Trump’s agenda.

Here’s what you need to know:

The Trump agenda will necessarily be implemented in two phases: (1) the proverbial first 100 days dominated by executive orders and (2) the first year (or more) thereafter featuring sweeping regulatory changes and new laws.

What distinguishes these two phases is the need — or lack thereof — for the Senate to confirm the Trump administration officials who will be critical in implementing the new MAGA deal.

Here’s the good news: Nobody in the West Wing other than the Office of Management and Budget director and Council of Economic Advisers chair needs Senate confirmation. The entire West Wing can be staffed immediately after Election Day without any Senate delay and can begin putting executive orders on the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office for a Trump signature as early as Inauguration Day.

Here’s the bad news: All 22 Cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries, along with numerous undersecretaries and assistant secretaries, must undergo a protracted and uncertain Senate confirmation process that is likely to take well beyond 100 days and up to a year or more to complete.

Such delays would not be unique to a second Trump term. It took 100 days to confirm 22 of Mr. Trump’s 24 Cabinet-level positions. Yet only five deputy secretaries were confirmed in those first 100 days.

As an example of how a hostile Senate can block a president on key issues, it took 111 days for Mr. Trump to get his U.S. trade representative, Bob Lighthizer, confirmed despite the importance the president had attached to his trade policies and cracking down on China.

President Biden fared no better, with only 18 of 23 Cabinet-level positions and 10 deputy secretaries confirmed. Together, Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden faced massive vacancies at the undersecretary and assistant secretary levels that stretched well into the second and third years of their terms because of Senate shenanigans.

It was not always like this. The Reagan and George W. Bush Cabinets were largely confirmed in the first month. Franklin D. Roosevelt and George Washington filled their Cabinets within days.

In a second Trump presidency, expect Senate Democrats to use legislative maneuvers such as holds, extended debate and committee obstruction to slow-walk the Trump Cabinet as they did in 2017. Expect at least a few anti-tariff, open-border Republican senators to use the same tools to block key appointments at Cabinet agencies involved in securing the border and implementing Trump tariff policies.

Note: A Trump-friendly Senate majority leader such as Rick Scott could ameliorate at least some of this intraparty warfare as both John Thune of South Dakota and John Cornyn of Texas are staunchly anti-tariff and initially opposed Mr. Trump’s 2024 candidacy.

It follows that 99% of what Mr. Trump will accomplish will be done in the first 100 days through executive orders and presidential memorandums. These will be crafted by presidential appointees in the West Wing who do not require Senate confirmation.

The White House chief of staff, the directors of the National Economic Council, Domestic Policy Council and National Security Council, the White House legal counsel and the staff secretary responsible for moving executive actions to the president’s desk will be of paramount importance. This is why the appointments of these key personnel must be swift and right.

This was not how things went while Mr. Trump was in office. All four of his chiefs of staff opposed his trade and border policies, as did his first White House legal counsel, Don McGahn, and first OMB director, Mike Mulvaney.

Both of Mr. Trump’s National Economic Council directors, Gary Cohn and Larry Kudlow, were staunchly anti-tariff, as were Trump’s two Domestic Policy Council directors. Meanwhile, his two staff secretaries, Rob Porter and Derek Lyons, repeatedly slow-walked or diluted his trade and border initiatives.

2024 should be different. There is a core of trusted Trump loyalists and West Wing veterans from Main Street rather than Wall Street who could step into these critical roles and make sure the Trump policy agenda gets out of the gate fast and hits the mark of 100 actions in 100 days outlined by the president at numerous rallies.

Of course, there are an equal number of Wall Street denizens and Republicans in name only jockeying for each of these roles.

As the boss says, “let’s see what happens.”

• Peter Navarro served as Donald Trump’s manufacturing czar and chief China hawk. He is the author of “The New MAGA Deal: The Unofficial Deplorables Guide to Donald Trump’s 2024 Platform.” Follow him at www.peternavarro.substack.com.

https://peternavarro.substack.com/p/implementing-trumps-border-and-trade?r=1qo1e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true
« Last Edit: November 07, 2024, 06:54:09 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Trump the Revelator?
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2024, 06:31:15 AM »
Claims the Epstein, Diddy, etc. list will be released by Trump. I certainly hope so:

https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1854603814978060445

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Wait ‘Til Tomorrow
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2024, 06:53:23 AM »
2nd post:

Liz Wheeler
@Liz_Wheeler
Trump is President-elect for two days:

- Stock market hits record high
- Migrant caravan at our border dissolves
- Hamas calls for end to war
- Bitcoin hits record high
- Putin ready to end Ukraine war
- Qatar kicks out Hamas leaders
- EU will buy U.S. gas not Russian gas
- Putin will sell oil in U.S. dollars
- Zelenskyy phones Trump & Elon
- NYC Mayor ends vouchers for illegals
- Mexico to stop migrants at U.S. border
- China wants to work peacefully with us
- Big U.S. company to move out of China

I repeat: Trump has been President-elect for two days.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Pompeo not looking good here
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2024, 10:00:12 AM »

https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1854564278046478719

Seems he makes a good point, prefaced with "if true". It does not endear him to Trump.  I would still like to learn the longer, deeper story of the documents, if they incriminate the agencies attacking him and would have been destroyed - like J6 exculpatory d :-Docs etc.

If it was for no really good reason, then Trump was wrong, but should have been handled same as Joe, same as Pence, same as Hillary etc. Not armed, Jack booted thugs rampaging Mrs Trump's lingerie drawer while the former president was out of town.

Also, Pompeo perhaps was testing the waters for his own run at the time, and meaner things than that have been forgiven to assemble a new team.

Pompeo was a VERY good Sec of State.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2024, 10:07:29 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2024, 10:22:42 AM »
I don't agree

He said if the charges are true
and he is right Trump should have simply returned the darn documents instead of being the hard ass.

I don't see why I have to look the other way every time Trump is a jerk.

Yes I voted for him but I am not like Posobiec who is has love derangement syndrome for Trump.

And my view let
s move on. Pompeii was right on this point, and we should have him in the administration.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2024, 05:07:04 AM »


"Trump should have simply returned the darn documents instead of being the hard ass."

Maybe.  So much smoke here and so many lies from the Pravdas and dishonest leaks from Jack Smith that it is hard to tell.

As for Pompeo, the larger point is that Pompeo ran against him when Trump was looking to be down and out.  What I cited above is but one instance of this larger point.   I agree that Pompeo was an outstanding Sec. State, but am OK with Trump not feeling the love and trust.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Stefanik to UN
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2024, 07:08:43 AM »


https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828491

I am good with this.

BTW I have noticed her doing real legislative work in the weeds about matters of importance.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2024, 07:12:29 AM »
add her to the list of "smart
 women" that Trump surround
s himself with.

Cuban very smart businessman and generally likable but a political gaffer.

He would not be a good candidate for President despite his dreams of doing it.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Trump censoring Pompeo
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2024, 10:19:37 AM »
maybe more than just a personal grudge and may also be due to policy differences:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-behind-trump-s-mike-pompeo-ban/ar-AA1tQj3a?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=f15f6a11152646dfacaefc410fffd3bc&ei=37

After all, didn't Vance say nasty stuff about Trump early on only to be promoted to VP?



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2024, 08:49:40 AM »
I'm hearing of some great picks for the new Administration. But from what I read, I'm disappointed at first glance with the new Secretary of the Treasury, although I guess that decision is not final.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/11/09/donald-trump-cabinet-picks/76140063007/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Bessent

His plan I hear is based on the economic plan of former Japanese leader Shinzo Abe (ah-bay) , the three arrows.

https://www.adb.org/publications/three-arrows-abenomics-and-structural-reform-japan-inflation-targeting-policy-central#:~:text=Abenomics%20has%20%22three%20arrows%22%3A,and%20expanding%20social%20welfare%20expenses.

I like the Kudlow choice or whoever he would recommend. Maybe EJ Antoni
https://www.heritage.org/staff/ej-antoni
Casey Mulligan,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_B._Mulligan
Dan Mitchell
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_J._Mitchell
How about a smart, strong woman, https://www.mercatus.org/scholars/veronique-de-rugy

Thomas Sowell is 94.  Maybe he's available.

Hey Trump, are you reading the forum?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Sounds good to me!
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2024, 09:46:53 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Trump Adminstration 2.0, Sec of Defense Pete Hegseth
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2024, 06:06:04 PM »
Pete Hegseth from Forest Lake MN:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Hegseth

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2024, 07:06:20 PM »
I like Pete well enough, but Sec Def?!?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
List of previous Sec of Defense heads
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2024, 06:46:55 AM »
and its' structure:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_Defense

Pete is probably the first military vet who is only a major but I have not checked the others

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #20 on: November 13, 2024, 08:19:42 AM »
What do we know about his books?

Although I am deeply concerned about his lack of executive experience and doubt his depth regarding the workings of the military-industrial complex and the complexities of the contracts thereunder, I do sense a genuine concern for those who actually serve and have served.   He may be well-chosen to restore the bond with them and the will of those to come to serve.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 08:22:00 AM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #21 on: November 13, 2024, 08:27:43 AM »
I agree

what do your military friends think ?

mine are gravely concerned about this choice.

We don't need to throw the dice which is what this choice is.

Why could he simply edict to present staff to cut out the woke stuff?

plus a Fox News host?!?

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #22 on: November 13, 2024, 08:34:05 AM »
What do we know about his books?

Excellent books I understand, but I haven't read them.

Referred to in this article:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-s-pick-of-pete-hegseth-to-lead-pentagon-signals-turmoil-ahead/ar-AA1tYWCR

Reflecting on this pick a day...
He might be the right guy for the job considering what needs to be done right now. They are losing good people to woke policies and they are having huge recruitment problems as well. Plus they need political leadership in the direction of building ships and arms etc, replacing what we left in Afghanistan and what we sent to Ukraine. That involves working in Washington, through the White House, on Capitol Hill.

The opposition media calls him a Fox News host, but they should be calling him an army veteran. The media experience Is a plus if it means he is a good communicator. I have not seen his show.

Other positions such as chairman of the Joint Chiefs and Secretary of the Navy etc should be filled with former top military Commanders like General Eisenhower or Patton if they were available.

The top generals should be ready to fight and win wars wherever sent. The civilian leadership above them, the Secretary of Defense and the President, are constraints on that power, not the designers of battlefield strategy, in my view.  i.e. Navy, Army. Air Force can't go to Taiwan until we tell you to, but if we tell you to you need to fight and win like it's World War II again.

I would not choose Pete to be Chairman of the Joint Chiefs but he might be just right for this position at this moment.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 08:49:17 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #23 on: November 13, 2024, 08:40:42 AM »
" but he might be just right for this position at this moment in time."

but what if he is not?

never any guarantees but .......

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #24 on: November 13, 2024, 08:53:34 AM »
" but he might be just right for this position at this moment in time."

but what if he is not?

never any guarantees but .......

I was shocked at the pick also, but...

In times of war he tells the Generals, do what needs to be done and tell me what you need from Congress and the President to succeed. In times of peace, he'll be fine.

If he fails, it means the people above him and below him failed. Changing the personnel in the Pentagon is probably job one. He understands merit over dei. Now do it.

The Senate confirmation hearings will expose whether or not he is ready. I hope he can wow them. If not, shame on Trump.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 09:25:00 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Trump AG
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2024, 02:01:13 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2024, 02:09:30 PM »
On Martha MacCallum's show today, she had interesting convo with Shannon Bream.   I get where you are coming from, but would suggest you don't solidify regarding him quite yet.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2024, 02:23:45 PM »
" Martha MacCallum's show today, she had interesting convo with Shannon Bream."

Come on CD

what do these 2 have anything to do with it.
So what "insights" do they have?

Gaetz really?


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2024, 02:42:48 PM »
I respect MM, and IMHO Shannon Bream, beneath the good looks, isan attorney, is strong on legal analysis.   I'm going by what they said though, not who they are. 

Not inclined to flesh it out in this moment though.   No doubt there will be much sound and fury in the coming days anyway.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
LI on Gaetz
« Reply #29 on: November 13, 2024, 03:40:04 PM »
Legal Insurrection appears less than pleased w/ Gaetz. One commenter suspects he serves as a stalking horse to convince all the DOJ lefties to jump ship:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/11/trump-nominates-rep-matt-gaetz-for-attorney-general/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trump-nominates-rep-matt-gaetz-for-attorney-general

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
What If Trump Calls a Recess & Then Appoints his Cabinet?
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2024, 03:45:26 PM »
An interesting, inside baseball discussion of recess appointments. It appears there may be a petard in play:

The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent

About The Volokh Conspiracy
Could President Trump Recess Appoint His Entire Cabinet Under Justice Scalia's Noel Canning Concurrence?
Would a person serving under the Vacancies Reform Act, who resigns, create a vacancy for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause? Would a presidential adjournment of Congress be an inter-session or an intra-session recess?

JOSH BLACKMAN | 11.13.2024 4:47 PM
Ed Whelan writes that President Trump may adjourn Congress as a means to instantly confirm his entire cabinet without any confirmation hearings. In an earlier post, Ed writes that this approach may risk the Court overruling Justice Breyer's Noel Canning majority opinion, and adopting Justice Scalia's concurrence.

I maintain that Justice Scalia's opinion is correct on originalist grounds, as I noted in my earlier post. And I would be happy to see Justice Breyer's majority opinion repudiated. But even so, is this potential plan inconsistent with Justice Scalia's concurrence?

Under Scalia's opinion, the President could only fill a vacancy that arises during the recess of the Senate. Trump's plan would only be feasible if these cabinet positions become vacant during the recess of the Senate. Presumably, the holdover Biden cabinet officials will be long gone on January 20. And, on January 20, I suspect the President will use the Vacancies Reform Act to detail friendly people already in the federal government to serve as acting cabinet officials. What if one of them were to resign during the presidentially-induced recess? That is, on January 21, Trump adjourns Congress, and all acting cabinet officials resign. Would those vacancies have arisen during the recess of the Senate? Or, would the relevant starting point be when the last-confirmed official resigned? I don't know how the Recess Appointments Clause, as understood by Scalia, interacts with the Vacancies Reform Act. I doubt anyone has given this issue much thought.

There is a second issue. Under Justice Scalia's majority opinion, the President can only make a recess appointment during an inter-session recess, and not during an intra-session recess. That is, the President can make a recess appointment during the recess between sessions, and not during the recess in the middle of a session. Would a presidential-induced recess be an inter-session recess or an intra-session recess? This power has never been exercised before, so there is no precedent.

I had always thought this clause would cause an inter-session recess. At the Framing, intra-session recesses were very rare. Generally, Congress would meet for continuous periods, taking only short breaks, and then take very long inter-session breaks. To the extent this power was more likely to be used, it would be used to decide when to conclude one session, and begin another. But I don't know. I do think it is the case that this clause was not designed to trigger the President's recess appointment power. But that is a separate question from what kind of recess this power would trigger.

Those who joined the Noel Canning majority may very soon regret their choice.

https://reason.com/volokh/2024/11/13/could-president-trump-recess-appoint-his-entire-cabinet-under-justice-scalias-noel-canning-concurrence/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
McCallum - Bream on Gaetz
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2024, 04:17:14 PM »
I presume this is the video you are speaking of:

https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-news-shannon-bream-says-trump-attorney-general-pick-matt-gaetz-would-definitely-be

It isn't very elucidating other than he has good chance of not being confirmed anyway.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2024, 07:22:14 AM »
Following the Fetterman comments it went on with a video reporting the reaction within the Justice Dept. "Insanity!" Their reaction indicates he hit the right nerve.  Files are being shredded to get ready for the new scrutiny.

Gaetz in the House was not a team player. In the DOJ, we are not looking for a team player right now.

My view: For what Trump has gone through the last nine years, he deserves his pick for Attorney General, whoever that may be.

Bill Barr had experience and some gravitas.  I'm still waiting for him to investigate vote fraud and reform the agencies.  We unfortunately need someone with no friends in the agencies.

These aren't ordinary times and Trump only has four years, maybe just two.
----------
I'm hearing from people who know him, Pete Hegseth is a great pick.

And Marco Rubio is a GREAT pick. I wonder what President Xi thinks of that.

Plus, Ron DeSantis gets to pick his successor in the Senate.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 07:38:16 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 08:43:30 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0, Vance on Gaetz pick
« Reply #35 on: November 14, 2024, 08:34:58 AM »
Vance on Gaetz pick:

The main issue with Matt Gaetz is that he used his office to prosecute his political opponents and authorized federal agents to harass parents who were peacefully protesting at school board meetings.

Oh wait, that's actually Merrick Garland, the current attorney general.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Justice Matt Gaetz
« Reply #36 on: November 14, 2024, 08:58:52 AM »
I am still not convinced but as always time will tell.

I suppose he could replace Justice Thomas next.

sarcasm....yes


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #37 on: November 14, 2024, 09:40:10 AM »
I think this piece does a good job of explaining the Gaetz's backstory. It does reek of being a DC insider smear inspired by his effectiveness. If so it looks to me like Trump is giving the Deep State a long look at his middle finger:

The FBI’s Matt Gaetz Operation Sidelined An Effective Republican Voice At A Crucial Time. That Was The Point

BY: MOLLIE HEMINGWAY
SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

Gaetz was a highly effective member of Congress. Then all that changed with the publication of an anonymously sourced report accusing him of possibly being a child sex trafficker.
Author Mollie Hemingway profile

Prior to March 2021, Rep. Matt Gaetz was known for prominently pushing against Beltway groupthink.

The colorful Florida congressman had been one of the few Republicans to help win the public relations battle against the Russia collusion hoax, the conspiracy theory that President Donald Trump had stolen the 2016 election by colluding with Russia.

When Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., held secret hearings, selectively released information, and lied about coordination with the so-called whistleblower during the Ukraine impeachment hearings, Gaetz led a group of Republican congressmen in protest. The move, which enraged the corporate media and other partisans, helped unify Republicans in their eventual defeat of the impeachment stunt.

Following the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Gaetz defended concerns about election integrity, reminded Democrats of their support of nationwide riots the preceding summer, and criticized media and political overreaction to the rioters. He remains one of the very few Republicans to focus on the plight facing the men and women the Justice Department is targeting, just years after the department largely ignored the destructive nationwide riots that besieged the White House, federal courthouses, police precincts, and national monuments.

When Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., received praise from Beltway insiders for leading a small group of Republicans to join the Democrats’ second impeachment of President Trump, Gaetz immediately went to Wyoming to rally Republicans. The two had repeatedly sparred over Cheney’s support for lengthy and poorly managed foreign wars that Gaetz said did not serve American interests.

“We are in a battle for the soul of the Republican Party, and I intend to win it,” he said at a Jan. 28, 2021, rally in Cheyenne, long before she would be ousted from her leadership position in the House Republican conference. “You can help me break a corrupt system. You can send a representative who actually represents you, and you can send Liz Cheney home — back home to Washington, D.C.” Harriet Hageman delivered a humiliating primary defeat of Cheney less than two years later.

Gaetz was a frequent fixture on television, reportedly averaging 87 minutes a month on air during the 12 months prior to the end of March 2021. He was even considering leaving Congress to take a job as a cable news host.

Then on March 30, 2021, all that changed with the publication of an anonymously sourced report accusing him of possibly being a child sex trafficker.

A group of New York Times reporters who won awards for their roles pushing the Russia collusion lie penned an anonymously sourced article with a devastating headline: “Matt Gaetz Is Said to Face Justice Dept. Inquiry Over Sex With an Underage Girl.” The story was sourced to “three people briefed on the matter,” none of them identified in any way. The story contained no evidence against Gaetz of sex crimes, but much guilt-by-association. Late in the story, the pack of reporters admitted that no charges had been filed and that the “extent of his criminal exposure is unclear.”

Gaetz strenuously and immediately asserted his innocence and denied the accusations.

The Damage Was Done

On Friday, 18 months after he was accused of being a pedophile and child sex trafficker, the Washington Post published another anonymously sourced report. “Career prosecutors recommend no charges for Matt Gaetz,” said the article, published quietly on a Friday. Not only was he never convicted of any of the crimes he was alleged to have committed, he wasn’t even charged. And, if you believe the anonymously sourced claims, he isn’t going to be.

The damage was already done by the initial report, written by reporters who regularly regurgitate political leaks from Department of Justice and FBI sources.

“Matt Gaetz’s days in politics are likely numbered,” one CNN reporter claimed days after the initial report, noting how few people had come to his defense.

Of course, as even The Washington Post admitted, “Gaetz’s position is shaky. The allegations are of a sort that makes it very difficult for his colleagues to come to his defense. … [T]here’s an obvious political risk to vocally defending someone who might face sex-trafficking charges, so expect his political allies (including the former president) to remain fairly muted.”

That was the goal of the politicized leaks. Gaetz couldn’t very well critique the Department of Justice for their political prosecutions if he was a pariah who everyone thought was a pedophile.

On the year anniversary of the original Gaetz story, journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote that leaks “have the effect, and often the intent, of destroying someone’s reputation, convicting them of repellent crimes in the court of public opinion that will never be brought in a court of law, thus relieving the state of the requirement to prove the crime and depriving the accused the opportunity to exonerate themselves.”

That’s precisely what happened.

He was the target of multiple “Saturday Night Live” skits. “Gaetz is under investigation by the Justice Department for a number of crimes, including child sex trafficking and allegedly paying for sex,” The Washington Post said in a video report about the skits.

Politico reporters suggested the walls were closing in, writing, “Gaetz’s allies now fear that Greenberg is preparing to strike a deal with prosecutors to deliver Gaetz.” That was the tenor of coverage for months, even as Gaetz’s claims regarding being the target of criminal extortion were validated.

The Associated Press tried to tie Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to the scandal.

“If Matt Gaetz is innocent of sex trafficking, why does he need an expensive criminal defense attorney from New York?” said one left-wing attorney who is popular with corporate media.

The Democrat-run Ethics Committee in the House typically waits to run investigations of members until after the Department of Justice finishes an investigation. In Gaetz’s case, the committee went out of its way to begin — and announce — an investigation into the embattled Florida member.

Cheney and other obsessed Never Trump activists (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here) delighted in the anonymously sourced allegations against Gaetz. They haven’t yet apologized or publicly commented on Friday’s also anonymously sourced news.

Former Vice President Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff Marc Short even accused Gaetz of being a child trafficker just this past July after the congressman said Pence was a “nice guy” but that he would never be president.

“I don’t know if Mike Pence will run for president in 2024, but I don’t think Matt Gaetz will have an impact on that,” Short said. “In fact, I’d be surprised if he’s still voting. It’s more likely he’ll be in prison for child trafficking by 2024.”

War on Critics

The Department of Justice, the FBI, and the corporate media have a history of viciously attacking — usually through deceptive leaks and lies — anyone who threatens their power. Then-Rep. Devin Nunes was viciously attacked for his leading role in fighting the Russia collusion hoax. Selective leaks to propagandists at The Washington Post, The New York Times, and other outlets were used to gin up ethics complaints, allege wrongdoing, slow down oversight, sideline effective pushback, and cover up massive malfeasance on the part of the agency.

The Department of Justice and the FBI are out of control. The propaganda press are operating as co-conspirators in the operations they run against the American people. Should Republicans be able to take control of one or both houses of Congress, their task of helping save the republic must begin with using their oversight and purse power to dramatically rein in bureaucratic tyranny.

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. She is Senior Journalism Fellow at Hillsdale College and a Fox News contributor. She is the co-author of Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court. She is the author of "Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections." Reach her at mzhemingway@thefederalist.com

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/26/the-fbis-matt-gaetz-operation-sidelined-an-effective-republican-voice-at-a-crucial-time-that-was-the-point/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2de8JV0RaDV6YriCXLwJpVdlpMTRztRCQBBGqCBWO8_mjIrWCllAXRhv4_aem_eWiG20cZi5-MHMQkpCroJA

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19763
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #38 on: November 14, 2024, 11:29:49 AM »
all I gather is he did or does like to go out with girls who are much younger but of age of consent.

this is not sex trafficing or rape for sure

perhaps somehow there was some connection with someone who was.

the rest is murky to me.

I wonder if the Congressional bruhaha between Gaetz who was pissed at McCarthy and now vice versa has something to do with the investigation - meaning political or based on facts.

I dunno....

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #39 on: November 14, 2024, 12:36:53 PM »
all I gather is he did or does like to go out with girls who are much younger but of age of consent.

this is not sex trafficing or rape for sure

perhaps somehow there was some connection with someone who was.

the rest is murky to me.

I wonder if the Congressional bruhaha between Gaetz who was pissed at McCarthy and now vice versa has something to do with the investigation - meaning political or based on facts.

I dunno....

My take is Trump thinks a Deep State setup such as the one he endured is at the root of Gaetz’s problems and this nomination will force them to poop or get off the pot. It’ll be fun to see which the choose.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #40 on: November 14, 2024, 01:22:56 PM »
He is smeared by the 'seriousness of the charge'. Makes people like us hesitant to support him.

We want to think the FBI would never do this to a man if he wasn't guilty. Too bad we don't live in that world.

Both Trump and Gaetz must think he is Innocent (and Gaetz would know) or why would they invite more scrutiny.

I'm not getting behind him. I'm just in favor of Trump getting his pick up and try to fulfill his promises, unless we are shown good reason otherwise.

I wanted the DeSantis team. Before that I wanted the Rubio team. But we have this and I don't want it slowed down. We're asking him to completely reshape major institutions. Let's give it a try. Just my thoughts.



Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
    • View Profile
Turley on Gaetz: Bring on the Defibrillator
« Reply #43 on: November 14, 2024, 03:16:48 PM »
“If Trump wanted to defibrillate the Justice Department, the Matt Gaetz nomination is the 100,000-volt option. The President-elect clearly wants an outsider without cultural or professional ties to DOJ. However, securing confirmation will be a monumental challenge...”

Assuming Gaetz is the victim of character assassination, even if he’s not confirmed he’ll prove to be a win as the hearing will allow the DOJ’s skullduggery to be exposed, while the Deep State will poor resources into derailing him, resource it won’t be able to apply elsewhere. More here:

https://x.com/jonathanturley/status/1857007389834174672?s=61


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 04:33:02 PM by Crafty_Dog »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Another attack on Tulsi
« Reply #46 on: November 14, 2024, 03:59:07 PM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/stunningly-unqualified-expert-urges-senate-to-reject-trump-s-spymaster-pick/ar-AA1u3dVx?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=a982d2db16d643f1b18b52f9a89ee55d&ei=13

He is correct that she has absolutely zero background in these deep waters.

Unlike Pete Buttigieg, etc.

Unlike George HWBush who was chair of the RNC before being CIA Director.

From the article :
"She has no significant experience directing or managing much of anything."

  - Wouldn't that describe Barack Obama, and Joe Biden as well?

Wasn't Tulsi vetted to be President (top 10 finisher, ahead of Kamala) and considered for VP, but not to handle 'intelligence'?

Without doubts standards we'd have none.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 06:35:11 PM by DougMacG »


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19447
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0, Milei
« Reply #48 on: November 14, 2024, 08:24:35 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72281
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Adminstration 2.0
« Reply #49 on: November 15, 2024, 11:03:52 AM »
 8-) 8-) 8-)