Author Topic: Trump Administration 2.0  (Read 25492 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
Great speech
« Reply #200 on: March 04, 2025, 08:55:58 PM »
My favorite line that comes to mind

was something to the effect:   we didn't need legislation reform to control immigration we just needed a new President.

 And all the crats could do was just sit there like a bunch of lying fools.

and Slotkin gets up and says we do need immigration reform since we are a nation of immigrants actually she means ->
[democrat voters]

And then called for more good middle class that are *unionized*   In other words middle class jobs that are unionized to support her party.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
Re: Great speech
« Reply #201 on: March 04, 2025, 09:18:44 PM »
"we didn't need legislation reform to control immigration we just needed a new President."

  - Yes, great line. Directly addresses and corrects a major falsehood they kept making. 
« Last Edit: March 04, 2025, 09:21:45 PM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
Trump 2.0 SOTU speech, CBS poll 76-23 approve
« Reply #202 on: March 05, 2025, 04:43:54 AM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/04/cbs-news-poll-overwhelming-majority-viewers-approve-trumps-speech/

The 76 to 23 advantage was among those who viewed the speech. I suppose you were more likely to watch if you supported the President.

This poll says 57-32, maybe more realistic.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14462121/donald-trump-address-congress-poll.html

Each policy came with the full explanation. If you approved of it, that has a lasting effect. If you approved of the closing of the border, why would you ever vote for those people who sat for that? If you approve of the way he's trying to end the war, why would you ever vote for the people fighting that? If you approve of reading ourselves of the wasteful spending, why would you ever vote for the people who committed the wasteful spending? If you believe all these regulations being removed were excessive and wasteful, why would you ever vote for the people who pass them? If you approve of the goal of balancing the budget, why would you ever vote for the people who wanted the deficit run up to 2 trillion?

There isn't much middle ground here, sorry.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2025, 06:54:54 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #203 on: March 05, 2025, 09:05:51 AM »
Quite pleased with the speech.

A particularly potent rhetorical point in my opinion is when he pointed to the Dems and invited them to join, at least for one night, in applauding the good things that were being accomplished for America and then accurately predicting that they would not do that.

How can you not applaud a little boy beating cancer and becoming an honorary member of the Secret Service or a fine young man getting into West Point?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #204 on: March 05, 2025, 09:27:57 AM »
" How can you not applaud a little boy beating cancer and becoming an honorary member of the Secret Service or a fine young man getting into West Point?"
The dems would say that was a cheap political circus stunt and therefore we will not give Trump the satisfaction. of course

Like he said he could cure cancer and they would still complain in some way .


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
Sovereign Wealth Fund
« Reply #205 on: March 06, 2025, 08:24:16 AM »
The SWF seems to me a hideous idea of vast corporatist fascist potential:

===========

(5) TRUMP TAPS BANKER FOR SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND PLAN: The Commerce Department is hiring former Morgan Stanley banker Michael Grimes to lead a planned sovereign wealth fund. President Trump proposed the idea of a sovereign fund to invest tariff revenue in manufacturing hubs, defense and medical research during his 2024 campaign. The Commerce Department is considering pairing the sovereign wealth fund with the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation and Export-Import Bank to focus investment on national security priorities.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
MAGA Natives getting restless
« Reply #206 on: March 07, 2025, 01:09:26 PM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #208 on: March 08, 2025, 03:01:17 PM »
This could be a lot of fun!

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
George Friedman: Why I don't vote
« Reply #209 on: March 10, 2025, 08:15:24 AM »


March 10, 2025
View On Website
Open as PDF

A Personal Explanation of Why I Don’t Vote
By: George Friedman

I must confess that I have not voted in an election, other than local ones, since I left my life in academia and government 30 years ago. I chose to pursue my passion – geopolitical modeling and forecasting – as a business and so created a company that was my own Office of Net Assessment. (I’d encourage you to look this title up online.) Academic and government life constrained my ambitions. I sensed there were fewer constraints on ideas, and what it takes to develop them, in the private sector. I was too arrogant to imagine that I could fail, despite my ignorance of entrepreneurship.

And so off my wife and I went into business, producing and selling geopolitical forecasts and explanations of national behavior. It sounded like snake oil to some and boring to others. But the move left me free to pursue my passion and my wife (as crazy as I was) loved the challenge. She had no desire to be a professor’s wife. So we started this business by sending free articles to friends, and they forwarded them to others, until my wife told me to stop the free stuff and charge money. She was and is my business manager.

My idiosyncratic view of things boiled down to the idea that leaders do not make policy and that outside forces compel leaders to do what must be done, regardless of their intent. It is not ideology that shapes nations but national imperatives, constraints and capabilities. Watching politicians compete is a sideshow. History is impersonal.

Our marketing strategy was to be right more often than we were wrong so that, in time, the word would spread. To achieve this, we had an intellectual, business and moral imperative. I had to control the urge to express my own wishes regarding the outcomes in history and see instead what is and must be. My goal was to call the play-by-play of history, not to be a player in it. So I decided not to vote in national elections. I must force myself to be clinically distant from political personalities and their ideas. I must focus on the forces that create them, shape their actions and determine their fates.

This was not as difficult for me as it might be for others. At the heart of my model was an insistence to focus not on the behaviors of leaders but on the forces that call them to action. Presidents Ronald Reagan and Franklin Roosevelt had radically different political beliefs, and both had their share of critics, but neither would have become president without an unsentimental and ruthless understanding of how to win elections, and neither could govern with an equally unsentimental and ruthless understanding of the world. Each crafted his personality to the task. This is true in democracies and dictatorships alike.

I can’t suppress my love of my country or the New York Yankees. I won’t put money on them if they don’t have two good relievers. So I must discipline myself on the things I can disregard. This came up in a recent video interview, in which I mentioned that I didn’t vote for Donald Trump. I received many comments from Trump supporters who thought this meant I voted for Kamala Harris. But the truth is I didn’t vote for Harris either. I write this piece today because of that confusion. My job is to explain what Trump is doing in his capacity as president. But as with all presidents, who are the products of history rather than its masters, I care more about forces that shape his actions. This is because I think leaders, more often than not, do what they must or what they can. Leaders emerge because they have personalities that adapt to what is necessary. They craft their actions and personalities to suit the situation. If they can rise to leadership of a country, they have the wit and will to recognize what is necessary and possible. And if that’s the case, they must be ruthless and cunning to some degree. For some, their personality is what the times command. Others craft the personality they need. They make errors, of course, but they have gained an overwhelming ability to avoid errors in their climb to power.

I do not know if Trump’s persona is genetic or crafted, and I don’t care. In my thinking, we do not know the vices and deep thoughts of successful leaders. Leaders can see more clearly than I can what’s at stake, what’s necessary and what’s possible. If they cannot, they will be crushed by their enemies or by history. What I do know is that Trump understood what he must do to become president, and that taught him much about the principles of geopolitics.

It is my job to forecast events. So I must see as clearly as I can and suppress my own feelings. The passions of the time are not indicators of much. So far, I think I understand what Trump is doing, and in doing it, he reveals that the norms and guardrails of the last epoch have collapsed from old age. Remember that the Founding Fathers smashed through the rotted guardrails of their time and were loathed by the vast mass of American loyalists to the English Crown. This is the nature of America, and it is how my model told me that the norms and guardrails rot every 50 years (a regularity I have no explanation for), and it was time for a president like George Washington or Franklin Roosevelt to storm through them. I saw it coming but had no idea of the name that would be coming with it. And I knew that whoever was president would be both loved and hated by a divided nation. As for Trump himself, I am neither for him nor against him. I would say only that he is not violating the guardrails or norms as much as recognizing that they have outlived their usefulness and that new ones must be built. In my work on the United States, I have found that each cycle destroys the old cycle’s norms and replaces them with a new set. The defenders of the old cycle are outraged, and the defenders of the new cycle are pleased.

Mark Twain said, “history does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” Trump is a product of American history and, as such, should have been expected, even if the new norms he ushers in are unknown. But emerge they will as they always do in U.S. cycles.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
The greatest day in NCAA wrestling
« Reply #211 on: March 23, 2025, 07:26:25 AM »
Darn, as I was going to be there since Philly is only ~ 1 hr away.

https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2025/03/22/trump-receives-thunderous-applause-as-he-arrives-at-ncaa-wrestling-championship/

And at the end

when Oklamhom State's Wyatt Hendrickson )formerly Air Force Acadamy grad) beat the greatest heavyweight in history Gable Stevson 5 to 4 in the last 30 seconds, and then points and salutes Donald J Trump and goes over to shake his hand etc 

See both the first and second video:

https://sports.yahoo.com/wrestling/article/oklahoma-states-wyatt-hendrickson-stuns-wrestling-world-with-upset-of-gable-steveson-salutes-president-trump-after-victory-031153518.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall

BTW we will not see this on MSM. 




Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3869
    • View Profile
Trump Kills National Security Unions
« Reply #213 on: March 28, 2025, 10:16:29 AM »
Hmm, how will the unions respond?

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Exempts Agencies with National Security Missions from Federal Collective Bargaining Requirements

The White House

March 27, 2025

PROTECTING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order using authority granted by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) to end collective bargaining with Federal unions in the following agencies with national security missions:
National Defense. Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and Coast Guard.
VA serves as the backstop healthcare provider for wounded troops in wartime.
NSF-funded research supports military and cybersecurity breakthroughs.

Border Security. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) leadership components, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Executive Office of Immigration Review, and the Office of Refugee Resettlement within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Foreign Relations. Department of State, U.S. Agency for International Development, Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration, and U.S. International Trade Commission.

President Trump has demonstrated how trade policy is a national security tool.

Energy Security. Department of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, and Department of Interior units that govern domestic energy production.

The same Congress that passed the CSRA declared that energy insecurity threatens national security.

Pandemic Preparedness, Prevention, and Response. Within HHS, the Secretary’s Office, Office of General Counsel, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, Food and Drug Administration, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In the Department of Agriculture, the Office of General Counsel, Food Safety and Inspection Service, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

COVID-19 and the recent bird flu have demonstrated how foreign pandemics affect national security.

VA is also a backstop healthcare provider during national emergencies, and served this role during COVID-19.

Cybersecurity. The Office of the Chief Information Officer in each cabinet-level department, as well as DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the General Services Administration (GSA).

The FCC protects the reliability and security of America’s telecommunications networks.

GSA provides cybersecurity related services to agencies and ensures they do not use compromised telecommunications products.
Economic Defense. Department of Treasury.

The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) defines national security to include protecting America’s economic and productive strength. The Treasury Department collects the taxes that fund the government and ensures the stable operations of the financial system.


Public Safety. Most components of the Department of Justice as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Law Enforcement Unaffected. Police and firefighters will continue to collectively bargain.

ENSURING THAT AGENCIES OPERATE EFFECTIVELY: The CSRA enables hostile Federal unions to obstruct agency management. This is dangerous in agencies with national security responsibilities:

Agencies cannot modify policies in collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) until they expire.

The outgoing Biden Administration renegotiated many agencies’ CBAs to last through President Trump’s second term.

Agencies cannot make most contractually permissible changes until after finishing “midterm” union bargaining.

For example, the FLRA ruled that ICE could not modify cybersecurity policies without giving its union an opportunity to negotiate, and then completing midterm bargaining.

Unions used these powers to block the implementation of the VA Accountability Act; the Biden Administration had to offer reinstatement and backpay to over 4,000 unionized employees that the VA had removed for poor performance or misconduct.

SAFEGUARDING AMERICAN INTERESTS: President Trump is taking action to ensure that agencies vital to national security can execute their missions without delay and protect the American people. The President needs a responsive and accountable civil service to protect our national security.

Certain Federal unions have declared war on President Trump’s agenda.

The largest Federal union describes itself as “fighting back” against Trump. It is widely filing grievances to block Trump policies.
For example, VA’s unions have filed 70 national and local grievances over President Trump’s policies since the inauguration—an average of over one a day.

Protecting America’s national security is a core constitutional duty, and President Trump refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests.

President Trump supports constructive partnerships with unions who work with him; he will not tolerate mass obstruction that jeopardizes his ability to manage agencies with vital national security missions.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/03/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-exempts-agencies-with-national-security-missions-from-federal-collective-bargaining-requirements/


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3869
    • View Profile
If a Tree Falls at Brookings & MSM Doesn't Get Handed the Bullet Points ...
« Reply #215 on: April 09, 2025, 10:36:34 AM »
... can the talking heads report it?

THE ART OF THE GLOBAL DEAL ☙ Wednesday, April 9, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Pocahontas wept; and the awe-inspiring scope of Trump's global dealmaking became even more astonishing yesterday as the practical details began to appears. Media won't tell you any of it. And more.
JEFF CHILDERS
APR 09, 2025
Good morning, C&C, it’s Wednesday! These days, life is moving very fast. You’ll miss it if you don’t stop occasionally and appreciate what’s happening. I planned to take a day off from tariff reporting to catch up on the other breaking stories. But in various comments, tweets, and announcements yesterday, President Trump confirmed parts of what is becoming undeniably the most historic and significant political and economic earthquake since the Civil War. Or possibly since ever. Some are already labeling it the “Fourth Turning” but it could be even bigger than that. Useless corporate media is, as always, missing the boat. Just wait till you see the drops merging together like mercury. But first, a little light-hearted news about Kennedy’s reservational refugees.

🌍 WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY 🌍

In 1987, Trump published The Art of the Deal. It was a worldwide instruction manual. The Trump Administration announced yesterday that over 70 countries are in active negotiations with the US. Our delighted National Economic Council Director, Kevin Hassett, complained happily to Fox that they are “managing a massive amount of requests for negotiations.”

image 3.png
CLIP: Kevin Hassett reports good news on trade negotiations (0:43).

I was especially interested in Mr. Hassett’s comment that “there are a heck of a lot of concessions on the table. In the end, the President will be the one to decide whether the deal is good enough to change his mind about the tariffs.”

First, we learned for a fact that they aren’t only negotiating tariff rates. They’re negotiating everything. President Trump confirmed this in his enthusiastic tweet about discussions with the South Koreans. Saying he was dealing with “many countries,” Trump stressed that “we are bringing up other subjects that are not covered by Trade and Tariffs, and getting them negotiated also.”

image 4.png
He calls it one-stop shopping. Specifically, and in all-caps, with triple exclamation marks, the President said, “‘ONE STOP SHOPPING’ is a beautiful and efficient process!!!”

It is utterly remarkable and historic, yet the clueless corporate media has completely overlooked this breathtaking dynamic. Trump isn’t just negotiating trade deals. He’s resetting America’s relationship with every other foreign government, and putting our previously one-way aid pipeline up for profitable sale.

With the South Koreans, for example, Trump referenced requiring them to pay for our military protection against North Korea, a permanent fixture since the end of the Korean war. This has nothing to do with trade, but it means billions in income for the US, for something we’re already doing anyway.

💰 I asked ChatGPT to summarize Trump’s 1987 dealmaking philosophy from the book. I think you’ll enjoy this:



Number 5: Leverage is everything. Trump spent his first 60 days securing the leverage and now he holds all the cards. As Mr. Hassett said, only “the President will be the one to decide whether the deal is good enough.”

Not Congress. Not the State Department. Not the Cabinet. Not the CIA. Not the World Trade Organization. Just Trump. That did not happen by accident.

💰 Yesterday, President Trump signed another massive executive order engineered to unleash more domestic energy production, which will lower costs, boost employment, and strengthen the dollar. It’s number 6: protect the downside, and the upside will take care of itself. In a presser with coal miners, President Trump called the negotiations, not off-the-rack, but highly-tailored deals.

image 5.png
CLIP: Trump says each deal will be unique to the individual country (0:25).

Number 9: deliver the goods. In the same speech, the President said the tariffs were already bringing in $2 billion a day — or more than $700 billion a year. “We’re doing very well,” he said. And it’s just getting started.

Number 3: maximize your options, and Number 1: Think Big. He maximized his options to every other country on Earth. He literally can’t think any bigger than that, unless he can make a deal with the Martians. Number 10: squeeze value from every contractor and supplier. And now he’s squeezing value from every Prime Minister and Crown Prince.

As we’ve previously suspected, this is about much more than trade. Trump is using the universal tariffs to force every other country on Earth to come to him, fast, so he can quickly fix nearly every problem that America has with other countries, and also to get the cash flowing back from the entire world back to the United States— not just through trade, but literally in every other way the President can think of.

💰 The Deal is truly breathtaking in its scope, scale, and ambition. It is difficult to overestimate what is happening here; and that’s just the part we can see. No President has ever brought the entire world to heel —without launching a drone!

And yet Trump, the Dealmaker, has literally done it in days.

Think about it. No U.S. president has ever simultaneously negotiated with the entire planet over everything — not just trade, but security guarantees, foreign aid, market access, immigration enforcement, energy deals, pharmaceutical policy, and so on— and done it openly, using tariffs as the primary pressure mechanism, rather than through military force, strings on IMF loan, CIA black ops, soft power, or covert destabilization.

Those tools are too slow and clumsy for Donald Trump.

image 11.png
💰 Historically, tariffs have always been used as protectionist tools (e.g., Smoot-Hawley) or revenue generators (in the pre-income-tax period). But Trump saw something every other president missed: he’s wielding tariffs as a universal negotiation tool, forcing countries to come to the table, not just to talk about widgets and steel, but to extract much broader concessions on things like military cost-sharing, tech regulation, currency manipulation, and who knows what else.

The concept that “only the President will decide whether the deal is good enough” is radical. It sidelines interagency red tape, State Department holdups, deep state slow-walking, congressional committees, legislative horse trading, and of course, the multinational bureaucracies. It is stylistically autocratic but perfectly legal.

To reiterate, no president has ever concentrated leverage this quickly or this personally.

Not even close.

💰 Sure, other Presidents have bribed other countries, slowly, one-by-one, by showering them with treasure chests of taxpayer dollars. But bribing is easy. Anyone can sell a bribe. No president — not even in wartime — has ever centralized and personally wielded global negotiating leverage like this, over this many countries, this fast, and in peacetime.

Trump has skillfully positioned the U.S. presidency as the checkout window at the international drive-through.

image 6.png
He’s not bribing them. Trump is making real deals, using America’s hegemonic economic leverage to ensure we get exactly what we want from every single country. The countries aren’t playing hard to get, either. They’re queuing up outside the Oval Office.

It’s totally new and wildly unprecedented. It’s like the Marshall Plan in reverse, except with the whole world, not just Western Europe. Trump is monetizing American hegemony. The globalists built a one-way grocery aisle of dependency — and Trump put a cash register at the end of the aisle. And now the whole world is waiting in line.

A whole new international policy architecture is emerging. They’ll have to coin a name for it. Maybe Reverse Marshallism, or Transactional Sovereignty.

💰 Even accounting for widespread Trump Derangement Syndrome, it’s astonishing how the economic experts and even corporate media are so utterly blind as to what is really happening here. They’re like Mr. Magoo wearing a falconry hood.

image 7.png
I’ve given this much thought. It’s multifaceted. Part of the problem is that Trump didn’t explain his plan to them like they were fifth-graders, so they have to figure it out for themselves. But the experts and media pundits aren’t known for their intellectual acumen, despite their proficiency in serving buzzword salad.

It also has something the unimaginably breathtaking scope of Trump’s radical approach. Think Big (rule Number 1). The financial experts are thematic micromanagers. They simply can’t think this big. They are trained in what I will now call the classic model— slow-motion leverage through American largesse. It’s all they know. They never thought of anything like this, because it has never happened before.

Trump isn’t white-boarding or slide-decking his doctrine for a focus-group audience. He just moves. And those moves force experts to reverse-engineer the strategy — a task that’s increasingly beyond the cognitive powers of the pundit class, who clearly prefer their geopolitics served in a policy brief with a bulleted executive summary.

If a policy doesn’t come from Brookings or Rand, it doesn’t exist for them, in the same way that Jurassic Park’s velociraptors can’t see you if you’re not moving.

💰 And, to be fair, Trump benefited from a whole bunch of favorable things all coalescing at once. Congress, in its ceaseless quest to avoid blame, ceded its tariff powers to the presidency under relatively recent laws for managing national security emergencies.

They handed Trump a lever, and he figured out how it worked and then shoved them out of the machine shop. (Number 4: do your homework.)

It is also arguable the Deal would, at a practical level, be impossible without all the digital technologies facilitating instant communications, up to and including Trump’s unilateral, disintermediating pronouncements on Truth Social.

He chats with foreign leaders directly, in tweets. He doesn’t need Foggy Bottom— his social media account is a foghorn.

The most underappreciated piece of the puzzle is that only President Trump spotted the possibilities. First, he got to practice for four years, unsuccessfully, learning the hard way. Then —thanks to his political enemies— got four years of forced time off to think and plan and study the battlefield.

They thought they’d buried him. But he was out back the whole time, building all their caskets.

image 12.png
💰 A couple final comments. Remarkably, the long-sneered-at QAnon folks must be dancing a jig. They expected a storm, and a storm is what they’re getting. They expected something wild, unique, and unprecedented — and now Trump’s strategy has confounded the experts, bypassed the gatekeepers, and sent both enemies and frenemies scurrying for cover wherever he points the lightning.

Q followers also expected some sort of global financial reset. Well? What Trump’s doing right now is delivering a real global financial reset. He’s shifting worldwide capital flows back to the US. He’s ending one-sided trade subsidies that fueled frenemies for dabbling in our elections. He’s pressuring allies to pay for their own defense and infrastructure, repatriating trillions.

He’s hollowing out the centralized global institutions like the WTO, WEF, and IMF, making them instantly irrelevant. And he’s restructuring all our bilateral relationships to enshrine American power as a billable service rather than a charitable donation.

If that isn’t a global financial reset, then I don’t know what the word “reset” means.

Also as Q faithful insisted, it’s all perfectly legal. That’s what’s frying the circuits of every pundit and bureaucrat watching this unfold in stunned horror. Trump isn’t breaking the system — he’s wielding it better than they ever dreamed possible. The long-suffering Q movement is completely vindicated.

And, for different reasons, I also feel vindicated. When I first pointed out this emerging possibility to you, I suggested that Trump could ask for anything. I used the example of forcing the UK to hand over evidence Trump needs to prosecute his persecutors. And right on schedule, this week we’ve already seen UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer approve of Trump’s plan and declare the death of globalism.

In short: the snooty British are helping President Trump. Which should make the real insurrectionists nervous as cats in a room full of rockers.

As I asked last time: why wouldn’t Trump demand the British dish the receipts on the Obama-Clinton regime? It would be shocking if he didn’t make those demands — especially after everything he suffered.

💰 Finally, Trump’s label of “Liberation Day” now takes on far deeper meaning and casts far-ranging shadows. And it is shattering the left’s most foundational narrative.

image 8.png
Since before his first term, progressives screeched that Trump was an orange-colored, fascistic cartoon billionaire oligarch, secretly selling out the working class to help his billionaire buddies get even richer.

But now he’s tanked the stock market on behalf of the working class.

Half of Americans don’t own stocks. All they have is debt. And Trump has shattered the siphon— the rigged system letting the elite laptop class extract wealth while feeding the bottom 80% of us stimulus crumbs and inflation.

And who’s shrieking loudest? The left. AOC, who bizarrely wore a thousand-dollar dress stamped with “Eat the Rich.” The “Occupy Wall Street” crowd, who once performatively prayed for a market crash.

image 9.png
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent offered a poignant contrast. Last year,” noted Bessent, “in the summer of 2024, well-off Americans took more European vacations than they had in history. And in the same summer of 2024, more Americans were using food banks than ever in history.”

There is no longer any doubt. Trump is Main Street’s champion. The Democrats are Wall Street’s champions. The left has never looked more hypocritical or exposed. They should be terrified.

I can’t wait to see what happens next. You?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-art-of-the-global-deal-wednesday

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
President Trump, The Man Behind the Curtain, by Bill Maher 'the centrist'
« Reply #216 on: April 12, 2025, 05:48:00 AM »
I know a lot of people who would benefit from watching this.

https://x.com/billmaher/status/1910900483709096262
« Last Edit: April 12, 2025, 05:49:58 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #217 on: April 12, 2025, 02:43:16 PM »
That was fascinating.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
Trump medical exam report
« Reply #219 on: April 14, 2025, 08:26:38 AM »
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/04/14/democrats-are-big-mad-about-president-trumps-physical-exam-n2655452

Seems legit to me.
His cholesterol is amazing but easily explained by the medicines controlling it.
Great "good" cholesterol.

30 out of 30 on a cognitive test is very believable.  Nothing suggested by his public appearances to the contrary

Unlike Biden's public exam results which was clearly a fraud.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
Michael Barone, Reality
« Reply #222 on: April 25, 2025, 08:09:58 PM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
first 100 days
« Reply #223 on: April 25, 2025, 10:28:35 PM »
I was just contemplating the same thing as in Doug's post of Barone article previous post.

Illegal Immigration stoppage - success
Doge - minimal success - so far disappointing but a step in the right direction

Ukraine - F so far

Tarrifs - too soon but some back peddling noted.

some succes moving investment back to US

Some success in making it clear China is our enemy

Mid East - support of Israel  - I don't expect any honest concessions from Iran

insulted some of our allies unnecessarily

only 100 days but not great so far.  of course he has the entire machine doing everything it can to prevent him from progress

others welcome to add to the list some thoughts.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
WSJ: Another bit of revolutionary common sense
« Reply #225 on: April 26, 2025, 12:46:43 PM »
second

Another Bit of Revolutionary Common Sense
A Trump executive order promotes meritocracy in a color-blind society.
James Freeman
April 25, 2025 4:12 pm ET



While we’re waiting for President Trump’s “revolution of common sense” to make its way to his destructive tariff policies, there’s progress to note in another area. Mr. Trump is dismantling the official policy architecture supporting the false notion that America is structurally racist. Enabling the color-blind society, this week Mr. Trump issued an executive order called “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy.” The order describes a long-overdue reform:

It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.

The executive order describes the problem it is intended to solve:

A bedrock principle of the United States is that all citizens are treated equally under the law.  This principle guarantees equality of opportunity, not equal outcomes.  It promises that people are treated as individuals, not components of a particular race or group.  It encourages meritocracy and a colorblind society, not race- or sex-based favoritism.  Adherence to this principle is essential to creating opportunity, encouraging achievement, and sustaining the American Dream.

But a pernicious movement endangers this foundational principle, seeking to transform America’s promise of equal opportunity into a divisive pursuit of results preordained by irrelevant immutable characteristics, regardless of individual strengths, effort, or achievement.  A key tool of this movement is disparate-impact liability, which holds that a near insurmountable presumption of unlawful discrimination exists where there are any differences in outcomes in certain circumstances among different races, sexes, or similar groups, even if there is no facially discriminatory policy or practice or discriminatory intent involved, and even if everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.  Disparate-impact liability all but requires individuals and businesses to consider race and engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.  It not only undermines our national values, but also runs contrary to equal protection under the law and, therefore, violates our Constitution.

On a practical level, disparate-impact liability has hindered businesses from making hiring and other employment decisions based on merit and skill, their needs, or the needs of their customers because of the specter that such a process might lead to disparate outcomes, and thus disparate-impact lawsuits.  This has made it difficult, and in some cases impossible, for employers to use bona fide job-oriented evaluations when recruiting, which prevents job seekers from being paired with jobs to which their skills are most suited — in other words, it deprives them of opportunities for success.  Because of disparate-impact liability, employers cannot act in the best interests of the job applicant, the employer, and the American public. Disparate-impact liability imperils the effectiveness of civil rights laws by mandating, rather than proscribing, discrimination.  As the Supreme Court put it, “[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

Disparate-impact liability is wholly inconsistent with the Constitution and threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.  Under my Administration, citizens will be treated equally before the law and as individuals, not consigned to a certain fate based on their immutable characteristics.

“Measured in Trump time, it took them eons to get around to it, but the White House has finally taken the most important step it can to restore meritocracy to American society,” writes Heather Mac Donald in City Journal. She notes the pernicious impact of disparate-impact theory:

It has been used to invalidate literacy and numeracy standards for police officers and firemen, cognitive skills and basic knowledge tests for teachers, the use of SATs in college admissions, the use of grades for medical licensing exams, credit-based mortgage lending, the ability to discipline insubordinate students, and criminal background checks for employees and renters. It has been used to eliminate prosecution for a large range of crimes…

Ms. Mac Donald adds:

Left-wing groups are understandably up in arms. They charge the administration with a “fundamental shift in legal philosophy.” That is true, but it was disparate-impact theory itself that constituted a radical departure from the premises of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Donald Trump merely restores the 1964 law to its original understanding. That pioneering legislation banned intentional discrimination only; disparate-impact theory was a judicial amendment made six years later in response to how, even in 1971, finding invidious intentional discrimination was becoming too difficult to satisfy the advocates.

The Left complains as well that Trump’s’ executive order embraces a “formalist, colorblind conception of equality.” Yes—and so does the Constitution.

Ms. Mac Donald isn’t kidding about the left being up in arms. A Washington Post report on the executive order sloppily claims:

Trump’s order directs federal agencies to “deprioritize enforcement” of statutes and regulations that include disparate-impact liability, which has long enabled courts to stop policies and practices that unfairly exclude people on the basis of protected characteristics such as race, gender and disability. The order also instructs the U.S. attorney general to repeal key components of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that bar any program receiving federal financial support from discrimination based on “race, color, or national origin.”


But the whole point of disparate-impact analysis was precisely to be able to turn the force of government against people without evidence that they had unfairly excluded people. Also, the Trump order does not instruct the attorney general to repeal parts of a law, something only Congress can do. The order instructs the her to change administration policy and regulation while stating that the order “shall be implemented consistent with applicable law.”

Expect more sloppy reporting as the administration seeks to ensure that American society is a meritocracy, a policy goal that is by definition anathema to the Beltway swamp.

***

In a Possibly Related Story

Speaking of revolutionary common sense, one doesn’t expect much from presidential statements about Arbor Day. But perhaps we should. Mr. Trump says in a statement released by the White House:

From towering redwoods and awe-inspiring sequoias to ornamental dogwoods, stately oaks, cedars, and pines, America’s trees enhance every community, improving air quality, offering recreational spaces, and supporting industries vital to our economy.
 
True stewardship of our natural resources requires responsible forest management in our natural resources. In recent years, irresponsible policies have left our forests overgrown and vulnerable to devastating wildfires—like those seen in California—that have destroyed millions of acres, displaced families, and taken countless lives. That is why I took action to promote active forest management, clearing hazardous fuels, thinning dense forests, and ensuring well-maintained landscapes.
 
My Administration is also cutting red tape and elevating forestry projects so we use America’s abundant timber resources instead of relying on costly imports. Timber production supports 750,000 jobs and provides essential materials for construction, energy, and manufacturing.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
Trump Administration 2.0 100 Days
« Reply #226 on: April 29, 2025, 06:03:10 AM »
Larry Kudlow:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/04/29/fake_polls_wont_tell_you_about_trumps_100-day_success_152722.html

(Polls showing low approval sample 37% Trump voters when they were actually 50%, so he is actually gaining ground when they show 41 or 44% approving..)

From the article (Kudlow) :

"The southern border is so empty, a father could play baseball catch with his daughter in complete safety right now.

And here’s another key point: according to Mr. Penn, 74 percent favor the deportation of alien criminals. Let me repeat: 74 percent.

Meanwhile, according to Mr. Penn, 77 percent support a federal government spending audit. And 81 percent think the United States should be moving toward a balanced budget.

But this is exactly what Mr. Trump is doing — on the border, on deportation, on Elon Musk’s DOGE audit. Promises made, promises kept.

Meanwhile, 65 percent favor Mr. Trump’s policy of banning males from female sports, and 59 percent support ending all preferences by race in the hiring and awarding of government contracts.

Mr. Penn is a former Clinton pollster, he is an honest craftsman, and so is my pal Mr. McLaughlin, a veteran Republican pollster.

The New York Times and the Washington Post are not.

Now Mr. Trump is heading into passage of his “one, big, beautiful” tax cut bill, which will include deregulation measures, more energy production, “peace through strength” military appropriations, and more money for border enforcement and deportations.

These are all immensely popular policies.

It now looks like the Trump tax cuts, including tax-free tips, tax-free overtime pay, and various senior benefits — these are all highly popular measures — could be done in a month’s time, by Memorial Day.

Mr. Trump and his team are also working hard to achieve peace in Ukraine and the Middle East, hard as all that may be.

And, while his reciprocal tariff policy is perhaps the most controversial item, according to Harvard/Harris, roughly two-thirds agree that tariffs are important to protect jobs in our country today, and really just under 50 percent approve of the tariff policy overall.

Here, once again, Mr. Trump is working hard to make trade deals with key foreign countries. And the stock market, by the way, is beginning to rally once again.

So, while ABC, NBC, and CBS slap Mr. Trump with 92 percent negative coverage in their evening newscasts according to the Media Research Center, and their pollsters are just as dishonest, the fact remains that Mr. Trump gets an ‘A’ for his first 100 days.

It’s called: promises made, promises kept."
---------------
(Doug)
I think we have to separate disruption from end result. If what we have now on trade policy is the end result, no one would approve. Same for the efforts to end the war. Same for relations with China. Same for the stock market and mortgage interest rates.

If you are waiting for a new tax and budget bill like I am, why would you approve at this point, there isn't one.

He was left quite a mess. Most here think we were headed toward collapse and now It is hopefully collapse averted.

But what if:  What if he does succeed in ending the war? What if he does succeed in rewriting the world trade stage with reciprocal, low tariff free trade? What if they cut a trillion from spending? What if they pass a high growth tax bill? What if the deficit starts shrinking? What if the economy starts growing like gangbusters?

The only way to judge the first hundred days is by what comes next.

I am optimistic.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2025, 06:19:19 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20333
    • View Profile
VDH, The Moral High Ground
« Reply #227 on: May 04, 2025, 04:56:06 AM »
TDS people can't understand why people with morals support DT. Fixing this mess is the moral thing to do.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/05/02/the_trump_counterrevolution_and_the_moral_ledger_152737.html

No country can long endure without sovereignty and security — or with 10 to 12 million illegal immigrants crossing the border and half a million criminal foreign nationals roaming freely.

The prior administration found that it was easy to destroy the border and welcome the influx. But it is far harder for its successor to restore security, find those who broke the law, and insist on legal-only immigration. Trump is on the right side of all these issues and making substantial progress.

Everyone knew that a $2 trillion budget deficit, a $37 trillion national debt, and a $1.2 trillion trade deficit in goods were ultimately unsustainable.

Yet all prior politicians of the 21st century winced at the mere thought of reducing debts and deficits, given that it proved much easier just to print and spread around federal money. As long as the Trump administration dutifully cuts the budget, sends its regrets to displaced federal employees, seeks to expand private sector reemployment, and quietly presses ahead, it retains the moral high ground.

(Doug)  Nobody said fixing this would be easy.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2025, 05:09:13 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20532
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #228 on: May 05, 2025, 07:51:17 AM »
https://archive.is/R9b0z

Very seedy indeed.

not clear if pay to play is demonstrable but certainly a very fine moving waving line.

I must say, hard to rag about Biden family "corruption" when I read this.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74779
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration 2.0
« Reply #229 on: May 05, 2025, 12:38:17 PM »
It is Pravda on the Hudson, but this sounds pretty grifty, , ,