Author Topic: Homeland Security, Border, sabotage of energy, transportation, environment  (Read 987739 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
More of this likely from new Biden judges
« Reply #2503 on: December 29, 2021, 02:47:28 AM »
Courts wrestle with Hispanic disparity in cases

Most actions involve ousted migrants attempting U.S. return

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Forget drugs or fraud. The most common type of case federal prosecutors bring is against illegal immigrants who try to reenter the country after having been ousted — and almost all of those charged are Hispanic.

Now federal courts are grappling with whether that imbalance means the law itself is racist.

One court in Nevada has already ruled that it does. Judge Miranda Du, a President Obama appointee, said the section of law that makes it a felony for someone previously ousted to sneak back into the U.S. has racist antecedents dating to the 1920s.

Though the law has been updated since then, Congress has never “confronted the racist, nativist roots” of the law, the judge ruled. She said that, coupled with the overwhelmingly Hispanic targets for prosecution, makes the law unconstitutional.

She tossed the government’s case against Gustavo Carrillo-Lopez.

The Biden administration has appealed and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing the case, which has reverberated across the legal world and is shaping up as a significant test of the critical race theory’s approach to criminal law.

“If we are trying to uproot systemic racism, that means we have

to consciously understand what motivated a law’s original enactment, and then make the conscious decision whether we want to change it or whether we want to continue it,” Ahilan Arulanantham, codirector of the Immigration Law and Policy Center at UCLA School of Law and one of the leading scholars on the history of the illegal-reentry law, told The Washington Times in an interview earlier this year.

The illegal reentry law, section 1326 of Title VIII of the U.S. Code, governs “reentry of removed aliens.”

Those guilty of the basic offense can be sentenced to two years in prison. If they had a drug record or a basic felony on their criminal record they could earn 10 years, and if they had an aggravated felony record they could get up to 20 years.

Usually, sentences are much shorter, but the law has serious teeth — and a lot of targets.

According to a report last month by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, there were 30,636 prosecutions in fiscal year 2018 under Section 1326. That’s more than 36% of all federal prosecutions. Drug trafficking, the second most common, only accounted for half that many.

The BJS study doesn’t give an exact racial breakdown for Section 1326 prosecutions, but it does say 98% of all illegal immigrants prosecuted in 2018 were Hispanic, so it’s a good bet almost all Section 1326 cases were Hispanic.

The study was published after Judge Du’s ruling, but she pointed to the overwhelmingly Hispanic demographics of those arrested jumping the border as evidence that “Mexican and Latinx individuals” are disproportionately affected by the illegal reentry law.

She said that, coupled with the fact that illegal reentry was first criminalized by Congress in 1929, by lawmakers who were influenced by the Jim Crow era of racial segregation and were looking to tamp down on Mexican migration.

Section 1326 itself was written in 1952 — again with arguably discriminatory intent, Judge Du concluded — and its penalties were stiffened in 1988, 1990, 1994 and 1996.

The judge said those Congresses never explicitly came to terms with the racist antecedents.

Kris Kobach, former secretary of state in Kansas and a prominent legal figure among groups who want stricter immigration, was stunned by the ruling.

“The judge’s conclusions are ridiculous,” he said. “The law is neutral on its face, and it is justified by a multitude of legitimate reasons having nothing to do with race. It is nonsense to declare that the statute must be ‘cleansed’ in some way because an unknown number of legislators who supported a predecessor statute a century ago might have been racially biased,” he said.

The Justice Department, in its appeal briefs, said Judge Du’s math equating the high number of Latinos to racial discrimination ignored “the obvious alternative explanation that those numbers are attributable to geography and the high percentage of such individuals among the population of noncitizens unlawfully in the United States.”

Or, as Christopher J. Hajec at the Immigration Reform Law Institute put it to The Times earlier this year, when you border Mexico, and just south of that is Central America, you’re going to see a lot more illegal immigrants from those places trying to sneak back in.

“When you’re doing disparate impact you have to compare things with the right things. In the universe of illegal aliens a very large proportion are from Latin America, and that’s due to geography and economics,” Mr. Hajec said. “It follows that a large proportion of illegal entrants who’ve already been deported are going to be from Latin America, are going to be Hispanic.”

IRLI said the point of the law is to deter deported migrants from trying to come back, no matter where they’re from.

The case has forged odd alliances, with IRLI finding itself on the same side as the Biden administration.

Indeed, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas earlier this year told employees at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that he thought there should be more prosecutions under Section 1326.

“I see cases now where we apprehend and remove individuals that I think need to be prosecuted criminally,” he told employees during a virtual town hall this spring. He said he would work with the Justice Department to try to bring more cases.

But Mr. Arulanantham says there must be some reckoning of the law’s history, and pointed to his own experience serving for two years as an assistant federal public defender in El Paso.

He figures he handled maybe 150 illegal reentry cases, yet he didn’t know the law’s origins at the time.

“That’s how systemic racism works, it’s nobody’s fault, but we live in a system and unless you’re very consciously able to examine it, you just go along with it,” he said.

Carrillo-Lopez, the man at the heart of the Nevada case, was already deported twice, with the most recent expulsion coming in 2012. He snuck back in at an “unknown time,” and was living secretly in the U.S. — Nevada lists a dozen different aliases he’s used — until he was caught on state drug-trafficking charges in 2019.

He also has a prior felony conviction for drugs and a misdemeanor domestic-violence conviction.

Even if he beats the federal illegal reentry charges, he’s not going to be out on the streets soon. He’s serving a life sentence on the drug trafficking charge, with no possibility of parole until 2029.

So far, this appears to be the only case where a judge has tossed the charges over questions about Section 1326. But if Judge Du’s ruling stands, he wouldn’t be the last.

That would leave a couple options. Congress could go back and repass the illegal reentry law, or something like it, this time grappling with the history and concluding that whatever the motives of the past, there’s a good reason today to have a criminal bar on deported people sneaking back into the country.

But it’s not clear that Congress would pass such a law again at this time, which opponents say is part of the whole point of performing a systemic racism analysis on the legal code.

“Forcing Congress to reenact this statute would be a significant legislative undertaking, particularly when it played a huge role in family separation,” Mr. Arulanantham said.

The other option is to live without a criminal penalty, and rely on the civil code and its penalty — another deportation.

Even those who are convicted under Section 1326 and serve time — about six months, according to the new Justice Department report — will usually be deported at the end of it anyway, which raises questions about whether the criminal law is needed as a deterrent.

But there are other implications to a world where laws like Section 1326 are ruled unconstitutional because of racist intentions by Congress at the time.

One target could be gun control laws, such as the Gun Control Act of 1968, which imposed a ban on sale of firearms to felons and created the first federal bar on explosives.

Scholars have argued that law was part of a push to keep firearms out of the hands of the country’s Black residents.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18207
    • View Profile





G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Abandoned Americans
« Reply #2509 on: January 14, 2022, 06:38:51 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, and American Freedom
« Reply #2512 on: January 17, 2022, 07:50:10 PM »





Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: February 04, 2022, 09:02:57 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
AZ AG: It is a invasion!
« Reply #2518 on: February 07, 2022, 06:56:58 PM »
Arizona AG rules border surge is an ‘invasion,’ state can defend itself


By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Updated: 8:46 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2022
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich issued an official opinion Monday saying the surge of illegal immigrants coming across the border meets the legal definition of an “invasion” under the U.S. Constitution.

Mr. Brnovich‘s ruling is only on the legal situation. He said it’s up to Gov. Doug Ducey to make the actual determination, which would allow the state to “defend itself” under Article I, Section 10 of the founding document.

“The on-the-ground violence and lawlessness at Arizona’s border caused by cartels and gangs is extensive, well-documented, and persistent. It can satisfy the definition of ‘actually invaded’ and ‘invasion’ under the U.S. Constitution,” the Republican attorney general wrote in his opinion.

The ruling was requested by a member of the state assembly.

Mr. Brnovich‘s opinion is the latest salvo in a war of rhetoric over how bad the border has gotten under President Biden.

Jonah Goldberg picked up by CNN after resigning from Fox News over Tucker Carlson
The president and most of his team have refused to label the record surge of people and drugs a “crisis,” much less an invasion.

But sheriffs on the border, and elected officials of both parties, say “crisis” undersells what they’re seeing, and some cities on the border have declared states of emergency over having to handle the massive numbers.

Mr. Brnovich‘s opinion elevates the matter to one of constitutional proportions.

He said the key sections are Article IV, Section 4, which requires the government to guarantee each state a republican form of government and to “protect each of them against invasion,” and Article I, Section 10, which bars states from raising armies or engaging in war “unless actually invaded.”

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18471
    • View Profile
DHS selectively enforces security
« Reply #2520 on: February 12, 2022, 07:24:28 AM »
But not protecting our borders

instead

used as a military ops against the US citizens :

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/dhs-super-bowl-canada-truckers/2022/02/11/id/1056549/


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties
« Reply #2522 on: February 21, 2022, 10:23:59 AM »
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/02/fbi-still-silent-murder-dhs-whistleblower-phillip-lloyd-billingsley/

Haney didn't kill himself.

https://datechguyblog.com/2020/02/29/they-tell-no-tales/





Good thing DHS has the qualified Jeh Johnson and not some dem machine hack running it.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/268282-dhs-ordered-me-to-scrub-records-of-muslims-with-terror

DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties
By Philip Haney


Amid the chaos of the 2009 holiday travel season, jihadists planned to slaughter 290 innocent travelers on a Christmas Day flight from the Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan. Twenty-three-year old Nigerian Muslim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab intended to detonate Northwest Airlines Flight 253, but the explosives in his underwear malfunctioned and brave passengers subdued him until he could be arrested. The graphic and traumatic defeat they planned for the United States failed, that time.

Following the attempted attack, President Obama threw the intelligence community under the bus for its failure to “connect the dots.” He said, “this was not a failure to collect intelligence, it was a failure to integrate and understand the intelligence that we already had.”


Most Americans were unaware of the enormous damage to morale at the Department of Homeland Security, where I worked, his condemnation caused. His words infuriated many of us because we knew his administration had been engaged in a bureaucratic effort to destroy the raw material—the actual intelligence we had collected for years, and erase those dots. The dots constitute the intelligence needed to keep Americans safe, and the Obama administration was ordering they be wiped away.
After leaving my 15 year career at DHS, I can no longer be silent about the dangerous state of America’s counter-terror strategy, our leaders’ willingness to compromise the security of citizens for the ideological rigidity of political correctness—and, consequently, our vulnerability to devastating, mass-casualty attack.

Just before that Christmas Day attack, in early November 2009, I was ordered by my superiors at the Department of Homeland Security to delete or modify several hundred records of individuals tied to designated Islamist terror groups like Hamas from the important federal database, the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (TECS). These types of records are the basis for any ability to “connect dots.”  Every day, DHS Customs and Border Protection officers watch entering and exiting many individuals associated with known terrorist affiliations, then look for patterns. Enforcing a political scrubbing of records of Muslims greatly affected our ability to do that. Even worse, going forward, my colleagues and I were prohibited from entering pertinent information into the database.

A few weeks later, in my office at the Port of Atlanta, the television hummed with the inevitable Congressional hearings that follow any terrorist attack. While members of Congress grilled Obama administration officials, demanding why their subordinates were still failing to understand the intelligence they had gathered, I was being forced to delete and scrub the records. And I was well aware that, as a result, it was going to be vastly more difficult to “connect the dots” in the future—especially beforean attack occurs.

As the number of successful and attempted Islamic terrorist attacks on America increased, the type of information that the Obama administration ordered removed from travel and national security databases was the kind of information that, if properly assessed, could have prevented subsequent domestic Islamist attacks like the ones committed by Faisal Shahzad (May 2010), Detroit “honor killing” perpetrator Rahim A. Alfetlawi (2011); Amine El Khalifi, who plotted to blow up the U.S. Capitol (2012); Dzhokhar or Tamerlan Tsarnaev who conducted the Boston Marathon bombing (2013); Oklahoma beheading suspect Alton Nolen (2014); or Muhammed Yusuf Abdulazeez, who opened fire on two military installations in Chattanooga, Tennessee (2015). 

It is very plausible that one or more of the subsequent terror attacks on the homeland could have been prevented if more subject matter experts in the Department of Homeland Security had been allowed to do our jobs back in late 2009. It is demoralizing—and infuriating—that today, those elusive dots are even harder to find, and harder to connect, than they were during the winter of 2009.

Haney worked at the Department of Homeland Security for 15 years.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/06/14/ironic-jeh-johnson-says-gun-control-now-a-homeland-security-issueorlando-terrorist-worked-for-dhs-n2178248

Irony: Jeh Johnson Says Gun Control Now a Matter of Homeland Security...Orlando Terrorist Worked For DHS
Katie Pavlich Katie Pavlich |Posted: Jun 14, 2016 12:15 PM  Share (977)   Tweet
Irony: Jeh Johnson Says Gun Control Now a Matter of Homeland Security...Orlando Terrorist Worked For DHS

The Islamic terrorist who carried out the horrific, atrocious attack on Pulse nightclub in Orlando Sunday morning was employed by G4S security company as a licensed, professional security guard with the ability to carry a firearm on duty. He worked at the company for years.

G4S is contracted by the Department of Homeland Security to protect federal buildings, including nuclear facilities, and is responsible for providing security protocol for major transportation hubs around the country.

Further, the terrorist (an American citizen) purchased the firearms he used Sunday legally and passed a background check to do so.

Despite these facts, during an interview with CBS this morning Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson declared gun control as a "matter of national security."

"Meaningful, responsible gun control has to be part of national security," Johnson said.

The Orlando terrorist was interviewed by the FBI three times and was under investigation for 10 months in 2013. At no point were his security credentials revoked. Maybe instead of focusing on gun control, Johnson should be focused on not allowing DHS contracted companies to employ those under FBI investigation for terrorism.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, and American Freedom
« Reply #2523 on: February 21, 2022, 12:15:07 PM »
Please post all that on the Deep State thread as well.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Biden admin restarts troubled Iraqi refugee program
« Reply #2524 on: March 03, 2022, 01:54:42 AM »
IMMIGRATION

Biden administration restarts troubled Iraqi refugee program

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The State Department said it is reviving an Iraqi refugee program that was abruptly shut down early last year after investigators discovered government employees had been pilfering files to help people file bogus applications.

Department officials insisted the vulnerabilities that led to the massive fraud that tainted thousands of applications have been fixed, though they were cagey on the details and wouldn’t say whether anyone has lost status because of the breach.

“During our review of the Iraqi P-2 Program, we identified and resolved the issues that led to our suspension of the program in January of 2021. We are committed to ensuring that only bona fide and qualified Iraqis who supported U.S. efforts in Iraq are considered for this important humanitarian program,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said Tuesday in announcing the restart.

The P-2 program is a special refugee category that’s supposed to reward Iraqis who assisted the U.S. in the lengthy war effort.

It was abruptly shut down just after President Biden took office last year, when authorities revealed a major breach in the P-2 program’s files. They found that two Homeland Security contractors had gotten access to hundreds of applicants’ files and were shipping the information to their ringleader, Aws Abduljabbar, who was using it to help other Iraqis file bogus applications.

Abduljabbar pleaded guilty to his role in the scam this year.

Robert Law, a former senior official at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said he’s wary of the State Department’s assurances that they’ve fixed things.

“Those claims deserve proper scrutiny before any additional Iraqis are allowed into the country,” said Mr. Law, who is now director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies.

He pointed to an inspector general’s report late last month that found significant security lapses in vetting Afghan evacuees who were brought to the U.S. under a justification similar to that of the Iraqis.

“The Biden administration continues to double down on its desire to get as many aliens into the country as possible without regard to proper vetting,” Mr. Law said.

The Iraqi program restart comes as Mr. Biden finds himself in need of an immigration win after the botched Afghanistan airlift, which evacuated tens of thousands of average Afghan nationals but left behind tens of thousands of allies who assisted the U.S. war effort.

The State Department has offered few answers for those left behind in Afghanistan, but said it will try to help those in Iraq.

“After an extensive review, we have resumed case processing for a select number of Iraqi P-2 cases that had been previously suspended during our review of the program,” Mr. Price said. “In coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, we will continue to review and process all other existing Iraqi P-2 cases that can move forward as well as accept new applications to the program.”

The program was suspended Jan. 22, just two days after Mr. Biden took office. Originally, it was supposed to be a 90-day pause while authorities figured out the extent of the breach, but it stretched to more than a year.

According to Abduljabbar’s plea deal, he said he was paying a Jordanian man who worked for USCIS at the U.S. Embassy in Amman to pore over files in the agency’s refugee system and pull out details of cases dealing with Iraqis. That Jordanian’s time at USCIS ended in 2016, but he managed to get into the computer system remotely, and illegally, for months afterward.

By then, the Jordanian had recruited another henchman for Abduljabbar — a Russian woman who worked at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and could pull files. From 2016 to 2019, the Russian woman stole access into at least 591 cases involving Iraqis applying for the P-2 program. She sent hundreds of screenshots and documents to Abduljabbar so he could keep tabs on those cases.

That knowledge helped him coach Iraqis on how to craft their applications. He provided inside information on what questions might be asked in interviews and what stories worked and what didn’t.

“As a result, the State Department, DHS and other agencies will spend millions of dollars to investigate and mitigate the damage,” prosecutors and Abduljabbar said in the statement of facts supporting his plea deal. “Among other tasks, this continuing effort involves the identification of [refugee] cases affected by the scheme, review of all cases to identify fraud and/or previously unidentified security risks, and an array of subsequent remedial steps.”

Reuters reported last summer that authorities suspect the fraud scheme tainted about 4,000 refugee cases. More than 500 of those had already been approved and admitted to the U.S.

Reuters said investigators found no connections to terrorism in the cases. Still, the Justice Department, in announcing the guilty plea, said the fraud ring was a risk “to public safety and national security” and potentially blocked legitimate refugees whose lives were in danger.

The State Department said this week it upgraded its databases last year and “addressed the vulnerabilities exposed by this case.” It also said it has reverified the employment documents of applicants.

But the department declined to say anything more on changes, and said it couldn’t comment on whether anyone has had refugee status revoked, citing the ongoing case against the fraudsters.

The P-2 program is supposed to reward people in danger because they assisted with American efforts in the war in Iraq.

Refugees accepted by the U.S. generally have fled their home countries, fear returning and are referred to the U.S. by the United Nations Refugee Agency. But the P-2 program, also known as “direct access,” allows people to apply from their home countries without undergoing U.N. vetting.

“All refugees undergo the highest level of security screening and vetting, including extensive interviews and the vetting of biographic and biometric information,” Mr. Price said Tuesday. “Only after an applicant has cleared all security vetting can they be deemed eligible for admission to the United States. In the admission of refugees to the United States, the safety and security of the American people is our highest priority.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Biden admin restarts troubled Iraqi refugee program
« Reply #2525 on: March 03, 2022, 03:02:48 AM »
What could possibly go wrong?


IMMIGRATION

Biden administration restarts troubled Iraqi refugee program

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The State Department said it is reviving an Iraqi refugee program that was abruptly shut down early last year after investigators discovered government employees had been pilfering files to help people file bogus applications.

Department officials insisted the vulnerabilities that led to the massive fraud that tainted thousands of applications have been fixed, though they were cagey on the details and wouldn’t say whether anyone has lost status because of the breach.

“During our review of the Iraqi P-2 Program, we identified and resolved the issues that led to our suspension of the program in January of 2021. We are committed to ensuring that only bona fide and qualified Iraqis who supported U.S. efforts in Iraq are considered for this important humanitarian program,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said Tuesday in announcing the restart.

The P-2 program is a special refugee category that’s supposed to reward Iraqis who assisted the U.S. in the lengthy war effort.

It was abruptly shut down just after President Biden took office last year, when authorities revealed a major breach in the P-2 program’s files. They found that two Homeland Security contractors had gotten access to hundreds of applicants’ files and were shipping the information to their ringleader, Aws Abduljabbar, who was using it to help other Iraqis file bogus applications.

Abduljabbar pleaded guilty to his role in the scam this year.

Robert Law, a former senior official at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said he’s wary of the State Department’s assurances that they’ve fixed things.

“Those claims deserve proper scrutiny before any additional Iraqis are allowed into the country,” said Mr. Law, who is now director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies.

He pointed to an inspector general’s report late last month that found significant security lapses in vetting Afghan evacuees who were brought to the U.S. under a justification similar to that of the Iraqis.

“The Biden administration continues to double down on its desire to get as many aliens into the country as possible without regard to proper vetting,” Mr. Law said.

The Iraqi program restart comes as Mr. Biden finds himself in need of an immigration win after the botched Afghanistan airlift, which evacuated tens of thousands of average Afghan nationals but left behind tens of thousands of allies who assisted the U.S. war effort.

The State Department has offered few answers for those left behind in Afghanistan, but said it will try to help those in Iraq.

“After an extensive review, we have resumed case processing for a select number of Iraqi P-2 cases that had been previously suspended during our review of the program,” Mr. Price said. “In coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, we will continue to review and process all other existing Iraqi P-2 cases that can move forward as well as accept new applications to the program.”

The program was suspended Jan. 22, just two days after Mr. Biden took office. Originally, it was supposed to be a 90-day pause while authorities figured out the extent of the breach, but it stretched to more than a year.

According to Abduljabbar’s plea deal, he said he was paying a Jordanian man who worked for USCIS at the U.S. Embassy in Amman to pore over files in the agency’s refugee system and pull out details of cases dealing with Iraqis. That Jordanian’s time at USCIS ended in 2016, but he managed to get into the computer system remotely, and illegally, for months afterward.

By then, the Jordanian had recruited another henchman for Abduljabbar — a Russian woman who worked at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and could pull files. From 2016 to 2019, the Russian woman stole access into at least 591 cases involving Iraqis applying for the P-2 program. She sent hundreds of screenshots and documents to Abduljabbar so he could keep tabs on those cases.

That knowledge helped him coach Iraqis on how to craft their applications. He provided inside information on what questions might be asked in interviews and what stories worked and what didn’t.

“As a result, the State Department, DHS and other agencies will spend millions of dollars to investigate and mitigate the damage,” prosecutors and Abduljabbar said in the statement of facts supporting his plea deal. “Among other tasks, this continuing effort involves the identification of [refugee] cases affected by the scheme, review of all cases to identify fraud and/or previously unidentified security risks, and an array of subsequent remedial steps.”

Reuters reported last summer that authorities suspect the fraud scheme tainted about 4,000 refugee cases. More than 500 of those had already been approved and admitted to the U.S.

Reuters said investigators found no connections to terrorism in the cases. Still, the Justice Department, in announcing the guilty plea, said the fraud ring was a risk “to public safety and national security” and potentially blocked legitimate refugees whose lives were in danger.

The State Department said this week it upgraded its databases last year and “addressed the vulnerabilities exposed by this case.” It also said it has reverified the employment documents of applicants.

But the department declined to say anything more on changes, and said it couldn’t comment on whether anyone has had refugee status revoked, citing the ongoing case against the fraudsters.

The P-2 program is supposed to reward people in danger because they assisted with American efforts in the war in Iraq.

Refugees accepted by the U.S. generally have fled their home countries, fear returning and are referred to the U.S. by the United Nations Refugee Agency. But the P-2 program, also known as “direct access,” allows people to apply from their home countries without undergoing U.N. vetting.

“All refugees undergo the highest level of security screening and vetting, including extensive interviews and the vetting of biographic and biometric information,” Mr. Price said Tuesday. “Only after an applicant has cleared all security vetting can they be deemed eligible for admission to the United States. In the admission of refugees to the United States, the safety and security of the American people is our highest priority.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Crime tourists-Brought to you by the left
« Reply #2527 on: March 20, 2022, 09:28:49 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
WSJ: Ukes entering through southern border
« Reply #2528 on: March 25, 2022, 05:04:53 AM »


Ukrainian Refugees Find Easier Path to Enter U.S. at the Mexican Border
Meanwhile, Russians fleeing sanctions and their government have a harder time getting into U.S.

A Ukrainian family waiting to seek asylum in the U.S. on Sunday at the border crossing in Tijuana, Mexico.
PHOTO: CESAR RODRIGUEZ/BLOOMBERG NEWS
By Alicia A. CaldwellFollow
Updated Mar. 25, 2022 7:24 am ET



TIJUANA, Mexico—Vladymyr Ostapchuk and his family walked up to the U.S. border with Mexico on Sunday afternoon to ask for asylum, the final border they would cross after a multicountry trip over 20 days that started as Russian military forces invaded their native Ukraine last month.

Mr. Ostapchuk, a 33-year-old construction worker from Vinnytsia, fled Ukraine by land through Moldova with his two children, his wife, and her brother’s family of four. They traveled through several countries before making their way to Germany, then on to Cancún, Mexico, and later Tijuana, just over the border from San Diego. Once in the U.S., they planned on heading to Vancouver, Wash., to reunite with relatives living there.

“I feel safe, better,” Mr. Ostapchuk said through a translator after he and his family arrived at the border crossing. A few hours later, they were allowed to enter the U.S.



Mr. Ostapchuk and his family are among thousands of Ukrainians and Russians fleeing war and sanctions, who are increasingly using Mexico as a transit point as they try to migrate to the U.S. Most choose this route because they don’t need a visa to fly directly to Mexico, unlike the U.S. Once they make it to a U.S. land border, they can ask for asylum and often begin the legal process, which sometimes takes years, inside the U.S. instead of in a faraway country.

Arrivals of migrants from Russia and Ukraine have increased in Mexico in recent months. In January and February alone some 30,111 Russians arrived in Mexico, compared with a full-year average of 12,380 during each of the past five years, according to Mexican immigration data.


Residents in Ukraine’s second largest city tried to extinguish fires after strikes by Russian forces. Following meetings with Western leaders, President Biden travels to Poland to visit a town that’s become a major arms resupply artery for Ukraine. Photo: Felipe Dana/Associated Press
The number of Ukrainians visiting Mexico has also surged during the same period to 10,031 during January and February, compared with a full-year average of 4,078. While entering as tourists, most are likely heading to the U.S., Mexican immigration officials say.

The U.S.-Mexico border remains officially closed to asylum seekers under a public-health rule meant to help curb the spread of Covid-19, but immigration officers working at border crossings were told last week that because of the war in Ukraine, they were free to offer exemptions to Ukrainian migrants.


“The Department of Homeland Security recognizes that the unjustified Russian war of aggression has created a humanitarian crisis,” the memo outlining the exemption process for Ukrainians said.

For most newly arriving Ukrainians, this means they would be allowed to stay for at least a year under a provision called “humanitarian parole” and wouldn’t have to apply for asylum or other protections during that time. On Thursday, in Poland, President Biden announced plans to accept up to 100,000 Ukrainian refugees. It is unclear when they might start arriving in the U.S.

Things are less clear for Russians. In recent months, thousands of Russians seem to have been allowed to ask for asylum and given court dates to begin asylum proceedings. But in recent days, growing numbers have been turned back and told to wait in Mexico, according to immigration advocates, migrants and others.


On Sunday afternoon, several Ukrainian families, all toting just a few suitcases, were allowed to enter the U.S. after each had waited a few hours on the Mexican side of the San Ysidro border crossing into San Diego.

A Russian group said they were turned away and referred to a Mexican government-operated shelter in Tijuana. The family declined to be identified, but one man in the group said it was confusing that Russians were being treated differently, despite also fleeing the Putin regime.

Earlier in March, groups of Russian and Belarusian families who had slept on the street near the border crossing, hoping to be allowed in, were taken by Mexican authorities to local hotels, immigration advocates said. A Mexican police officer, who declined to be identified, told reporters on Sunday that only Ukrainians were allowed to cross.


Since October, the start of the U.S. government’s budget year, about 1,300 Ukrainians have been taken into custody by immigration officials at the U.S.-Mexican border, more than double the number of such migrants during all of last year, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Separately, 7,100 Russian migrants have been taken into custody, nearly double the figure from a year ago.

Those migrants were usually quickly released into the U.S. and given a court date to appear to begin asylum proceedings.

The numbers for both Ukrainian and Russian would-be migrants are expected to grow in coming weeks, as the war devastates Ukraine and economic sanctions and growing authoritarianism make life in Russia more difficult.

Ukrainian migrants crossing the border on Sunday waited two-to-three hours outside a U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility. Their children sat atop suitcases and snacked on Carl’s Jr. hamburgers and fries brought by a local volunteer. Once inside, the Ukrainians spent less than 30 minutes being processed and received a stamp in their passports, giving them permission to stay in the U.S. for up to a year.



The Ostapchuks and members of their extended family after crossing the border and being released into San Diego on Sunday.
PHOTO: ALICIA A. CALDWELL/THE WALL STREET
“We get to stay…for one year,” a smiling Ilona Martyniuk said, showing off a photo of her stamped passport. She said the family was making arrangements to fly to Washington state and were looking forward to hugging other relatives, including her mother-in-law.

From early on in the pandemic, the Trump and then Biden administrations have used the public-health law known as Title 42 to disregard asylum requests and turn back hundreds of thousands of would-be migrants at the border, most of them from Latin America.

Some immigration advocates want the Title 42 restrictions lifted. The continued use of Title 42, along with reported delays for Russians and other nationalities, harm vulnerable migrants, said Margaret Cargioli, directing attorney at the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a legal-aid group working with asylum seekers in Tijuana.

The Homeland Security Department has said that every nationality is eligible for an exemption from Title 42 and they are granted on a case-by-case basis.

The Biden administration has temporarily halted deportations to Russia, Ukraine and several other Eastern European countries, all but ensuring that Russian migrants who are already in the U.S. or make it into the country will be allowed to stay for now.

Anastasiia Davidson, a 19-year-old hookah-bar barista from Kharkiv whose husband is an American, said she and her family debated where she should go in the lead-up to the war, choosing between Canada and Mexico. They settled on Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, a beach resort she had visited in early February. She decided to meet up with her husband at the border in Tijuana on Sunday, after the memo authorizing exemptions for Ukrainians was issued.

Ben Davidson, her husband, said the plan was always for Anastasiia to join him in San Francisco—they have already applied for a visa—but the war sped up the process.

“She was going to wait out the U.S. immigration system in Ukraine, but now she has no home to go back to,” Mr. Davidson said. “We were planning on her going to Canada, but it looks like she’s going to be able to come in.”

Ms. Davidson said the rest of her family has stayed in Ukraine. “My house already was bombed. My grandmother’s house was already bombed,” she said, adding that her uncle was killed on the second day of the war. “Every day it’s like a nightmare.”

Ms. Davidson and her husband flew home to San Francisco Sunday afternoon.

Juan Montes in Mexico City contributed to this article.

Write to Alicia A. Caldwell at Alicia.Caldwell@wsj.com

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Biden Packing America
« Reply #2529 on: March 25, 2022, 05:27:45 AM »
IMMIGRATION

Homeland Security finalizes plan to take over asylum cases

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Homeland Security released a final regulation Thursday taking control of decisions in border asylum cases, in a move analysts said is likely to lead to faster — and more — approvals.

The cases had been handled by immigration judges at the Justice Department, but under the new policy, they will shift to asylum officers at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Immigrant-rights advocates have complained that the judges were too strict, and they hope for more leniency from USCIS.

“The current system for handling asylum claims at our borders has long needed repair,” said Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

The new policy, announced in a 512-page interim final rule, also erases some of the limits on asylum claims put in place by the Trump administration from 2018 to 2020 but had gotten snared in court challenges.

The new rule is a critical part of the Biden administration’s plans to revamp how illegal immigrants’ claims at the border are handled.

Biden officials had said they want those overhauls in place to prepare for an expected surge of illegal immigrants once pandemic- era border restrictions are fully ended.

Rosemary Jenks, vice president of NumbersUSA, which calls for stricter immigration policies, said the asylum changes are ripe for a legal challenge if someone has the standing to bring it.

Those covered by the policy have jumped the border and are in deportation proceedings. Under the law, Ms. Jenks said, their cases are supposed to be handled by immigration judges.

“This is yet another example of this administration essentially rewriting the law to suit their own needs,” she said.

Mr. Mayorkas said he hopes the new process will deliver faster decisions so that those who qualify for asylum get status faster and those whose claims fail can be deported faster.

Currently, cases can drag on for years, and the ability of illegal immigrants to jump the border, make an asylum claim and then gain a foothold in the U.S. while waiting for a decision on their case has become an incentive for people to stream in, filing what turn out to be bogus claims.

In 2020, more than 70% of asylum claims were rejected, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. In 2021, the rejection rate was 63%.

Mr. Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland, who oversees the immigration courts at the Justice Department, said they hope the changes help ease the backlog of cases that has built up before the immigration judges.

USCIS began hiring officers to hear the expected crush of asylum cases last summer, just as it announced the initial proposal.

Asylum officers are recruited heavily from ranks of refugee resettlement agencies and are likely to bring a markedly proasylum perspective, compared to more neutral immigration judges, Ms. Jenks said.

“It’s basically putting the U.N. in charge of our asylum decisions,” she said. Asylum claims are similar to refugee claims, though refugees apply from outside the U.S. while asylum seekers are already on American soil.

Protections are supposed to be granted to those who claim fear of persecution back home because of their membership in a particular social class, such as their race, religion or political beliefs. In recent years, the definition has expanded to include some claims of spousal abuse and generalized violent crime.

Under the old system, an illegal immigrant who jumps the border and is caught can lodge a claim of “credible fear” of being sent back to those conditions at home. That determination is made by USCIS and is a lower standard than an actual asylum claim.

Those granted credible fear are then allowed to stay and pursue full claims of asylum, or other humanitarian protections.

Migrants approved for credible fear could be detained, but in reality, most are released with the hope they return for their hearings at some point before an immigration judge. Many do not.

Under the new system finalized Thursday, USCIS officers will still make the initial credible fear determination and then will get the first crack at the asylum decision, too.

If USCIS rejects an asylum claim, the migrant then gets another crack at making a case before an immigration judge. The Biden administration says those cases will have new controls to prevent them from dragging on.

The new system will be phased in, with only a limited number of cases at first, in order to give USCIS a chance to staff up

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
A friend writes
« Reply #2530 on: March 26, 2022, 03:43:06 AM »
"So apparently FEMA has been quietly activated to set up a command center at the border to start dealing with the surge.  Haven’t seen anything on the press.  Inside info from Chief Scott.  Technically FEMA cannot be activated unless there is a declared Federal emergency…..and this is done while this Administration claims there is no problem."

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: A friend writes
« Reply #2531 on: March 26, 2022, 07:10:21 AM »
I strongly suspect they are planning on war with Russia.


"So apparently FEMA has been quietly activated to set up a command center at the border to start dealing with the surge.  Haven’t seen anything on the press.  Inside info from Chief Scott.  Technically FEMA cannot be activated unless there is a declared Federal emergency…..and this is done while this Administration claims there is no problem."

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
WT: ICE sent on fool's mission?
« Reply #2532 on: April 05, 2022, 02:57:10 AM »
ICE to scour communities searching for border scofflaws

Officers voice doubts, say effort likely to be ineffective

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Department of Homeland Security will deploy teams of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers into communities to track down illegal immigrants the Biden administration caught and released at the border last year and who have since gone AWOL, The Washington Times has learned.

Some fugitive operations teams at ICE, who had been used to go after serious criminals, will be sent after the border jumpers, according to a memo detailing the new policy, known as “Operation Notice to Report Plus.”

But ICE officers doubt the chances of success, saying they have little hope of tracking down people who gave bad addresses to the government and haven’t built enough of a digital footprint to be found otherwise.

“We’re literally looking for ghosts,” one ICE source said. “This whole thing’s crazy.”

The assignment is particularly aggravating for ICE officers who feel they’re being tasked to play clean-up for the administration’s bungling.

The targets of the operation were caught by the Border Patrol last year and were in custody. But they were released without being given an immigration court summons and have ignored followup efforts to reach them.

“Part of me wonders whether this is meant to be effective, or if it’s largely a messaging exercise meant to persuade the public and the courts that this administration takes the laws seriously. I guess time will tell,” said Jon Feere, former chief of staff at ICE in the Trump administration.

ICE, in a statement to The Times, wouldn’t comment on the operation, calling it a “law enforcement sensitive” matter that conforms to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ priorities of “national security, public safety and border security” cases.

The new operation comes even as the administration prepares for another surge of migrants this spring that could obliterate last year’s record-shattering numbers.

During the worst of the 2021 surge, Border Patrol agents were so overwhelmed that they didn’t have time to process and issue a Notice to Appear (NTA), the official immigration court summons, to all of the people they were

Exclusive

catching and releasing. Instead, they issued a Notice to Report (NTR), which took about 10 minutes, or far less than the hour it takes to issue an NTA.

The difference is more than just the name of the form.

An NTA enters a migrant into deportation proceedings, and they can be ordered removed by an immigration judge if they don’t show up for their hearings.

Those given NTRs are not officially in deportation court proceedings. Instead, an NTR asks them to check in with an ICE office within 60 days and, in some cases, to collect an NTA.

Tens of thousands have failed to do so. ICE wouldn’t talk numbers with The Times, but in communications to Congress, Mr. Mayorkas revealed that from late March to the end of July, 104,171 illegal immigrants were caught and released with NTRs. Of those, 97,564 were beyond the 60-day window and 47,705 had failed to check in.

That works out to 49% who hadn’t checked in after 60 days, or substantially worse than the 25% refusal rate Mr. Mayorkas had claimed in testimony to the Senate in September.

Faced with the grim numbers, ICE late last year launched Operation Horizon, which fired off warning letters to the resisters begging them to come in and get their NTAs. The letters promised migrants they wouldn’t be detained, barring major criminal issues with their records.

Thousands of those summonses didn’t produce results, prompting the latest operation.

“It’s clear that the Notice to Report and Parole/Alternatives to Detention processes have failed. This is nothing more than catch-and-release by another name,” said Sen. James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican who has been closely tracking the border situation.

“The only real solution to address border security is to enforce the law, which Biden’s team is clearly unwilling to do,” the senator told The Times.

NTRs unite both sides of the immigration debate. Immigrant-rights advocates say they create all sorts of problems for the migrants, who have to go through extra hoops to figure out the immigration process they face.

“People who are given NTRs at a moment of what is crisis in their own lives are frankly set up for failure,” said Jorge Loweree, policy director at the American Immigration Council.

He said it’s incumbent on Homeland Security to get NTAs into the hands of everyone who was released on an NTR to give them an opportunity to present their case.

“If the government’s going to force you or me to go through a legal process with potentially serious legal consequences for us, the government needs to meet its burden and make sure we received the proper paperwork,” he said. “If the government can’t do that for a specific reason the government needs to figure out a way to make that right.”

According to the memo laying out the new operation, migrants with “criminal histories” will take top priority as officers decide who to target.

Officers were instructed to keep the operation “low profile in nature” because many of the targets will be families. They were told to wear plain clothes rather than uniforms, to keep body armor under their clothes, and to use unmarked vehicles.

Officers were given permission to arrest and detain migrants they thought were security or safety risks, and were also told they could bring some criminal cases to federal prosecutors.

But officers were specifically told they should not arrest other illegal immigrants they happen to come across as they’re tracking down the border fugitives.

“The approval to carry out an enforcement action against targeted noncitizens will not authorize enforcement actions against other noncitizens encountered during the operation,” the memo said.

The operation was scheduled to start April 1 and run through June 30.

One source said there are more than 3,600 initial targets, but officers are expecting more people to be added to the list during the 90 days.

ICE’s National Criminal Analysis and Targeting Center has been tasked with trying to develop leads to track down targets for the operation. Officers say they’re not expecting much.

The targets generally have no footprint beyond the addresses they gave, and those have already proved to be invalid. They haven’t been in the country long enough to generate other data, such as utility bills or car registration data, that could help the targeting center track them down.

“It’s a complete waste of time and resources that Mayorkas claims we already don’t have enough of,” said a second ICE source.

That source said even if the targets can be tracked down and pressured to go through their court proceedings, the administration might still just close their cases, giving them a free pass.

“That or they become the next protected class like the DACA aliens,” the source said, referring to the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which for a decade has offered a deportation amnesty to “Dreamers,” immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally as children.

Also complicating plans is Mr. Mayorkas’ rules limiting places where ICE officers can operate. He has generally barred enforcement actions near what he has deemed “protected” locations — schools, day cares, parks, clinics, bus stops and organizations that provide social services.

That places many urban areas offlimits, leaving officers wondering how they’re supposed to track down and serve NTAs to people who live near one of the protected areas.

Mr. Feere said if Mr. Mayorkas is serious about wanting the operation to succeed, he should waive his rules.

“And then the question becomes what happens if they do locate some of these individuals,” he said. “Are they actually going to be deported? Are they going to be detained?

He said the issue of absconders will outlast the Biden administration.

“It’s important for the GOP to really think about the resources ICE is going to need in the coming years to clean up the mess created by this administration,” said Mr. Feere, who is now director of investigations at the Center for Immigration Studies.


“It’s clear that the Notice to Report and Parole/Alternatives to Detention processes have failed. This is nothing more than catch-andrelease by another name,” Sen. James Lankford, Oklahoma Republican, said about the issue. ASSOCIATED PRESS


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: WT: ICE sent on fool's mission?
« Reply #2533 on: April 05, 2022, 02:58:38 AM »
Wank-wank!

ICE to scour communities searching for border scofflaws

Officers voice doubts, say effort likely to be ineffective

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Department of Homeland Security will deploy teams of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers into communities to track down illegal immigrants the Biden administration caught and released at the border last year and who have since gone AWOL, The Washington Times has learned.

Some fugitive operations teams at ICE, who had been used to go after serious criminals, will be sent after the border jumpers, according to a memo detailing the new policy, known as “Operation Notice to Report Plus.”

But ICE officers doubt the chances of success, saying they have little hope of tracking down people who gave bad addresses to the government and haven’t built enough of a digital footprint to be found otherwise.

“We’re literally looking for ghosts,” one ICE source said. “This whole thing’s crazy.”

The assignment is particularly aggravating for ICE officers who feel they’re being tasked to play clean-up for the administration’s bungling.

The targets of the operation were caught by the Border Patrol last year and were in custody. But they were released without being given an immigration court summons and have ignored followup efforts to reach them.

“Part of me wonders whether this is meant to be effective, or if it’s largely a messaging exercise meant to persuade the public and the courts that this administration takes the laws seriously. I guess time will tell,” said Jon Feere, former chief of staff at ICE in the Trump administration.

ICE, in a statement to The Times, wouldn’t comment on the operation, calling it a “law enforcement sensitive” matter that conforms to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ priorities of “national security, public safety and border security” cases.

The new operation comes even as the administration prepares for another surge of migrants this spring that could obliterate last year’s record-shattering numbers.

During the worst of the 2021 surge, Border Patrol agents were so overwhelmed that they didn’t have time to process and issue a Notice to Appear (NTA), the official immigration court summons, to all of the people they were

Exclusive

catching and releasing. Instead, they issued a Notice to Report (NTR), which took about 10 minutes, or far less than the hour it takes to issue an NTA.

The difference is more than just the name of the form.

An NTA enters a migrant into deportation proceedings, and they can be ordered removed by an immigration judge if they don’t show up for their hearings.

Those given NTRs are not officially in deportation court proceedings. Instead, an NTR asks them to check in with an ICE office within 60 days and, in some cases, to collect an NTA.

Tens of thousands have failed to do so. ICE wouldn’t talk numbers with The Times, but in communications to Congress, Mr. Mayorkas revealed that from late March to the end of July, 104,171 illegal immigrants were caught and released with NTRs. Of those, 97,564 were beyond the 60-day window and 47,705 had failed to check in.

That works out to 49% who hadn’t checked in after 60 days, or substantially worse than the 25% refusal rate Mr. Mayorkas had claimed in testimony to the Senate in September.

Faced with the grim numbers, ICE late last year launched Operation Horizon, which fired off warning letters to the resisters begging them to come in and get their NTAs. The letters promised migrants they wouldn’t be detained, barring major criminal issues with their records.

Thousands of those summonses didn’t produce results, prompting the latest operation.

“It’s clear that the Notice to Report and Parole/Alternatives to Detention processes have failed. This is nothing more than catch-and-release by another name,” said Sen. James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican who has been closely tracking the border situation.

“The only real solution to address border security is to enforce the law, which Biden’s team is clearly unwilling to do,” the senator told The Times.

NTRs unite both sides of the immigration debate. Immigrant-rights advocates say they create all sorts of problems for the migrants, who have to go through extra hoops to figure out the immigration process they face.

“People who are given NTRs at a moment of what is crisis in their own lives are frankly set up for failure,” said Jorge Loweree, policy director at the American Immigration Council.

He said it’s incumbent on Homeland Security to get NTAs into the hands of everyone who was released on an NTR to give them an opportunity to present their case.

“If the government’s going to force you or me to go through a legal process with potentially serious legal consequences for us, the government needs to meet its burden and make sure we received the proper paperwork,” he said. “If the government can’t do that for a specific reason the government needs to figure out a way to make that right.”

According to the memo laying out the new operation, migrants with “criminal histories” will take top priority as officers decide who to target.

Officers were instructed to keep the operation “low profile in nature” because many of the targets will be families. They were told to wear plain clothes rather than uniforms, to keep body armor under their clothes, and to use unmarked vehicles.

Officers were given permission to arrest and detain migrants they thought were security or safety risks, and were also told they could bring some criminal cases to federal prosecutors.

But officers were specifically told they should not arrest other illegal immigrants they happen to come across as they’re tracking down the border fugitives.

“The approval to carry out an enforcement action against targeted noncitizens will not authorize enforcement actions against other noncitizens encountered during the operation,” the memo said.

The operation was scheduled to start April 1 and run through June 30.

One source said there are more than 3,600 initial targets, but officers are expecting more people to be added to the list during the 90 days.

ICE’s National Criminal Analysis and Targeting Center has been tasked with trying to develop leads to track down targets for the operation. Officers say they’re not expecting much.

The targets generally have no footprint beyond the addresses they gave, and those have already proved to be invalid. They haven’t been in the country long enough to generate other data, such as utility bills or car registration data, that could help the targeting center track them down.

“It’s a complete waste of time and resources that Mayorkas claims we already don’t have enough of,” said a second ICE source.

That source said even if the targets can be tracked down and pressured to go through their court proceedings, the administration might still just close their cases, giving them a free pass.

“That or they become the next protected class like the DACA aliens,” the source said, referring to the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which for a decade has offered a deportation amnesty to “Dreamers,” immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally as children.

Also complicating plans is Mr. Mayorkas’ rules limiting places where ICE officers can operate. He has generally barred enforcement actions near what he has deemed “protected” locations — schools, day cares, parks, clinics, bus stops and organizations that provide social services.

That places many urban areas offlimits, leaving officers wondering how they’re supposed to track down and serve NTAs to people who live near one of the protected areas.

Mr. Feere said if Mr. Mayorkas is serious about wanting the operation to succeed, he should waive his rules.

“And then the question becomes what happens if they do locate some of these individuals,” he said. “Are they actually going to be deported? Are they going to be detained?

He said the issue of absconders will outlast the Biden administration.

“It’s important for the GOP to really think about the resources ICE is going to need in the coming years to clean up the mess created by this administration,” said Mr. Feere, who is now director of investigations at the Center for Immigration Studies.


“It’s clear that the Notice to Report and Parole/Alternatives to Detention processes have failed. This is nothing more than catch-andrelease by another name,” Sen. James Lankford, Oklahoma Republican, said about the issue. ASSOCIATED PRESS

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Cartel Drones at Border
« Reply #2534 on: April 06, 2022, 06:34:24 AM »
IMMIGRATION

Congressman pushes DHS to shoot down cartel drones

Bishop tells committee 200 crafts detected daily

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Rep. Dan Bishop was incredulous when Homeland Security officials told a House committee last week that they see about 200 suspicious drone flights a day at the southern border — and that’s just what they are able to detect.

“I don’t understand the reason that we would allow drones to come into the United States,” the North Carolina Republican said. “Why don’t we shoot them down?”

It’s a question that’s been percolating among border experts and Homeland Security officials for years, and one that still confounds policymakers.

The threat from drones is massive and growing, officials told the House Homeland Security Committee.

During one five-month period, Customs and Border Protection detected 30,000 flights.

Dennis Michelini, acting head of CBP’s Air and Marine Operations division, described for lawmakers what happened when a dronescanning system was turned on for the first time in one part of the border.

CBP immediately spotted flight signatures for 40 to 45 drones that they had no idea were in the skies over the border.

Some were Mexican government counter-drones, but others were flying back and forth across the border. They may have been hobbyists knowingly or unknowingly breaking the law, but some were likely to have been cartelcontrolled drones carrying drugs or observing Border Patrol movements in order to spot gaps in coverage.

“The amount out there was really staggering,” Mr. Michelini said.

He told Mr. Bishop that Homeland Security’s current approach is to disrupt drones’ flight operations. Essentially, that means breaking the connection between the remote pilot and the unit, which usually forces the drone to the ground, often returning back to where it took off.

CBP has two “covered areas” where it can deploy that capability. Few drones are actually interdicted, he said, but at least they are brought out of the sky for that time.

Mr. Michelini said Homeland Security doesn’t use “kinetic” force.

Mr. Bishop, in a follow-up interview with The Washington Times, said he wasn’t satisfied with the answers.

“It’s another sign of chaos, It’s another sign that every bit of U.S. policy under this administration is content with chaos at the border, including drone flights,” he said.

He said he will try to become chair of the Homeland Security Committee if Republicans take control of Congress next year, and he will demand better answers from the government.

It’s not just the border where authorities are struggling for answers on drones.

The Transportation Security Administration, the lead agency on drone threats at airports, said it considers disruption the best answer right now — but it has holes in its own capability to bring drones down.

“We’re focused on detect, track and identify,” said Austin Gould, TSA’s assistant administrator for requirements and capabilities analysis.

Rep. Diana Titus, Nevada Democrat, seemed horrified by the idea of shooting a drone out of the sky.

“I don’t think it’s quite that simple. I don’t think you start firing off rockets to shoot down drones in neighborhoods or along the border or along the river, where people live,” she said.

She said in Las Vegas, people illegally fly drones near the airport — formerly known as McCarran, and now as Harry Reid International Airport — to get pictures of the city’s skyline.

Mr. Bishop said she was conflating things by comparing solutions at airports to those at the border.

“I certainly don’t think we should be firing missiles at drones in Las Vegas,” he said. “I see a very different picture in terms of crossborder flights.“ He also said it wouldn’t take long to get a message across.

“If you blew up a bunch of Mexican cartel drones, especially the heavy ones you keep talking about, I don’t think they’d keep doing it,” the congressman said.

Rep. Carlos Gimenez, Florida Republican, said the U.S. needs to invest in more research to get an offensive capability to bring down drones.

“I really do believe it’s a matter of when, not if, some major event is going to be happening either at the border or it’s going to be happening in one of our airports or one of our transportation hubs through the use of these unmanned systems,” he said.

He worried about the looming danger of autonomous drones, flying on programming and preset GPS points rather than controlled by a pilot. Without pilot-to-drone communication, forcing them down is a far tougher task, experts said.

Mr. Gould said British authorities think that’s exactly the type of drone that was used in a 2018 incident at Gatwick Airport, when more than a thousand flights were canceled over three days as drone sightings halted operations.

Some security experts have also worried about the ability to arm drones. In 2017, federal police in central Mexico discovered four men suspected of cartel ties who were carrying a drone equipped with a bomb and a remote detonator.

Mr. Michelini said drones also pose a threat to his own people flying helicopters along the U.S.Mexico border.

He said there have been five “near-misses” with small drones and CBP aircraft in the last year and a half.

Mr. Gould said from the air traffic standpoint, drones over the last year forced 49 flights to have to take “evasive action” to avoid a midair collision

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Cartel Drones at Border
« Reply #2535 on: April 06, 2022, 06:55:39 AM »
We can spend trillions on defense, it just can't be used to actually defend the US or it's citizens.

Those are just hardworking Mexican drones crossing the border in hopes of a better life! It's an act of love!


IMMIGRATION

Congressman pushes DHS to shoot down cartel drones

Bishop tells committee 200 crafts detected daily

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Rep. Dan Bishop was incredulous when Homeland Security officials told a House committee last week that they see about 200 suspicious drone flights a day at the southern border — and that’s just what they are able to detect.

“I don’t understand the reason that we would allow drones to come into the United States,” the North Carolina Republican said. “Why don’t we shoot them down?”

It’s a question that’s been percolating among border experts and Homeland Security officials for years, and one that still confounds policymakers.

The threat from drones is massive and growing, officials told the House Homeland Security Committee.

During one five-month period, Customs and Border Protection detected 30,000 flights.

Dennis Michelini, acting head of CBP’s Air and Marine Operations division, described for lawmakers what happened when a dronescanning system was turned on for the first time in one part of the border.

CBP immediately spotted flight signatures for 40 to 45 drones that they had no idea were in the skies over the border.

Some were Mexican government counter-drones, but others were flying back and forth across the border. They may have been hobbyists knowingly or unknowingly breaking the law, but some were likely to have been cartelcontrolled drones carrying drugs or observing Border Patrol movements in order to spot gaps in coverage.

“The amount out there was really staggering,” Mr. Michelini said.

He told Mr. Bishop that Homeland Security’s current approach is to disrupt drones’ flight operations. Essentially, that means breaking the connection between the remote pilot and the unit, which usually forces the drone to the ground, often returning back to where it took off.

CBP has two “covered areas” where it can deploy that capability. Few drones are actually interdicted, he said, but at least they are brought out of the sky for that time.

Mr. Michelini said Homeland Security doesn’t use “kinetic” force.

Mr. Bishop, in a follow-up interview with The Washington Times, said he wasn’t satisfied with the answers.

“It’s another sign of chaos, It’s another sign that every bit of U.S. policy under this administration is content with chaos at the border, including drone flights,” he said.

He said he will try to become chair of the Homeland Security Committee if Republicans take control of Congress next year, and he will demand better answers from the government.

It’s not just the border where authorities are struggling for answers on drones.

The Transportation Security Administration, the lead agency on drone threats at airports, said it considers disruption the best answer right now — but it has holes in its own capability to bring drones down.

“We’re focused on detect, track and identify,” said Austin Gould, TSA’s assistant administrator for requirements and capabilities analysis.

Rep. Diana Titus, Nevada Democrat, seemed horrified by the idea of shooting a drone out of the sky.

“I don’t think it’s quite that simple. I don’t think you start firing off rockets to shoot down drones in neighborhoods or along the border or along the river, where people live,” she said.

She said in Las Vegas, people illegally fly drones near the airport — formerly known as McCarran, and now as Harry Reid International Airport — to get pictures of the city’s skyline.

Mr. Bishop said she was conflating things by comparing solutions at airports to those at the border.

“I certainly don’t think we should be firing missiles at drones in Las Vegas,” he said. “I see a very different picture in terms of crossborder flights.“ He also said it wouldn’t take long to get a message across.

“If you blew up a bunch of Mexican cartel drones, especially the heavy ones you keep talking about, I don’t think they’d keep doing it,” the congressman said.

Rep. Carlos Gimenez, Florida Republican, said the U.S. needs to invest in more research to get an offensive capability to bring down drones.

“I really do believe it’s a matter of when, not if, some major event is going to be happening either at the border or it’s going to be happening in one of our airports or one of our transportation hubs through the use of these unmanned systems,” he said.

He worried about the looming danger of autonomous drones, flying on programming and preset GPS points rather than controlled by a pilot. Without pilot-to-drone communication, forcing them down is a far tougher task, experts said.

Mr. Gould said British authorities think that’s exactly the type of drone that was used in a 2018 incident at Gatwick Airport, when more than a thousand flights were canceled over three days as drone sightings halted operations.

Some security experts have also worried about the ability to arm drones. In 2017, federal police in central Mexico discovered four men suspected of cartel ties who were carrying a drone equipped with a bomb and a remote detonator.

Mr. Michelini said drones also pose a threat to his own people flying helicopters along the U.S.Mexico border.

He said there have been five “near-misses” with small drones and CBP aircraft in the last year and a half.

Mr. Gould said from the air traffic standpoint, drones over the last year forced 49 flights to have to take “evasive action” to avoid a midair collision





DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18207
    • View Profile
Rubio: Biden Border Crisis to become a Catastrophe
« Reply #2540 on: April 13, 2022, 05:51:24 AM »
Good for Sen. Marco Rubio for drawing attention to this right now.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/southern-border-crisis-biden-catastrophe-sen-marco-rubio

What is sovereignty?  Without borders we aren't a governable nation. If not Biden, Harris and handlers, we need the people, a majority in the House and 67 Senators to agree.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Border Patrol in 2013
« Reply #2543 on: April 15, 2022, 04:56:03 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
23 Terror watch list interdictions in 2021
« Reply #2544 on: April 18, 2022, 01:40:45 PM »
FOX NEWS: Border Patrol stopped 23 people on terrorist database at southern border in 2021: CBP data

Border Patrol apprehended at least 23 people coming across the southern border whose names are on the terror watchlist in 2021, according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data obtained by Fox News.

Between Jan. 20 and Dec. 27, 2021, there were 23 encounters with individuals whose names matched on the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB).

Four were in the Rio Grande Valley Sector, 4 in Del Rio Sector, 3 in El Paso Sector, 2 in Tucson Sector, 2 in Yuma Sector, 4 in El Centro Sector and 4 in San Diego Sector. The information was provided to Fox News in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted in December.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile
Sounds good but does not address the legal asylum loophole
« Reply #2546 on: April 20, 2022, 02:12:44 AM »
Republican calls for military to contain cartels on border

Migrants from ‘all over the world’ entering U.S.

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Rep. James Comer, the House Republicans’ lead investigator, says it’s time to send active-duty military troops to the U.S. border with Mexico to shut down drug routes and curtail the reach of smuggling cartels, which control the boundary with startling effectiveness.

The lawmaker from Kentucky led a delegation from the House Oversight and Reform Committee to the border in California and Arizona last week. He said the level of chaos was noticeably higher than a similar trip to the border in Texas and New Mexico last year.

He said cartels dictate border operations, sending groups of migrants to tie up Border Patrol agents and then sneaking drugs into the U.S. The cartels have eyes on everything, and the brazenness of their defiance is stunning, he said.

“We were seeing buses and Ubers pull up and letting people out. They were waiting until we left, and they were going to walk across,” Mr. Comer said.

The lawmakers watched one group of 45 people from Cuba and Uzbekistan make their way into the U.S., Mr. Comer recounted. Agents said they are

also getting Syrians and Afghans and even nabbed some people from Poland.

“I don’t think that’s something the average person knows: These people are coming from all over the world,” Mr. Comer said.

Department of Homeland Security numbers released this week bear that out.

Of the 221,303 unauthorized border crossers nabbed at the U.S.-Mexico line in March, nearly 90,000 came from beyond the traditional sending countries of Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

Border Patrol agents reported apprehending more than 15,000 Colombians, 16,000 Nicaraguans and 32,000 Cubans.

Cubans are particularly prevalent in border arrests in Arizona. Mr. Comer said they are claiming to be members of the LGBTQ community and demanding asylum.

Other countries such as Turkey and India accounted for fewer people, but each has shown a massive increase in numbers over the past year.

The 1,353 Indians whom agents nabbed in March was up fivefold from March 2021, and the 1,962 people from Turkey marked a 55-fold increase from the 35 whom agents arrested a year ago.

Mexico also represented a resurgence of numbers in the March data, with nearly 90,000 caught by Border Patrol agents. That was the highest monthly total in years.

Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Chris Magnus said the situation will get even worse when the Biden administration ends the Title 42 pandemic border shutdown next month.

Still, he said Homeland Security is ready to deliver a fair and welcoming hand to the flood of illegal immigrants.

“CBP is surging personnel and resources to the border, increasing processing capacity, securing more ground and air transportation, and increasing medical supplies, food, water, and other resources to ensure a humane environment for those being processed,” he said.

The department expects up to 18,000 illegal immigrants a day to be caught at the southern border. In March, about 7,000 were nabbed each day, which was itself a near-record pace.

During the early days of the Trump administration, there were times when the Border Patrol caught fewer than 15,000 migrants in an entire month.

Mr. Comer said agents already are overwhelmed. They told him they spend more than half their time performing administrative duties, such as writing reports on apprehensions or providing caretaking for the migrants in custody.

That leaves fewer people to guard the border.

“Under President Biden, he has turned the Border Patrol into the welcoming committee for anybody who wants to come to the United States, for any reason,” Mr. Comer said.

The border chaos has been a major boon for smuggling cartels, which most migrants are compelled to pay for the right to cross into the U.S.

The typical payment for a Mexican migrant in March was $10,000, according to The Washington Times’ database of border smuggling cases. Central Americans were paying $10,000 to $15,000. Those from farther afield can pay even more.

Cartels’ control of the border is so overwhelming that when Mr. Comer was there, he said, agents pointed out a house on the Mexican side where cartel operatives were keeping watch on the congressional delegation. Agents also pointed to a hilltop on the U.S. side where cartel scouts were thought to be messaging Border Patrol movements back to the Mexican side.

“This is an issue of national security, these spotters that are over here, they’re a national security threat,” Mr. Comer said. “Not only are they complicit in allowing the illegal drugs to cross the border … they’re also involved in crime, just horrific crimes.”

That demands the presence of U.S. troops, the lawmaker said.

“There’s no fear of the United States government,” he said.

National Guard troops have been deployed before, and some are still on the border as part of state details, but Mr. Comer said it’s time to send activeduty troops.

“It’s the fact that the United States isn’t putting up a fight,” he said. “We need to have a military presence on the border. There’s clear paths across from Mexico to the United States where these drug smugglers are walking every day.”


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69318
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile