Author Topic: Homeland Security, Border, sabotage of energy, transportation, environment  (Read 982610 times)


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18348
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, and American Freedom
« Reply #2451 on: September 24, 2021, 08:16:51 AM »
hey CD

at first I though *BP* meant black people
but I realize you must mean Border Patrol

Cock Roach states BP Haitians are being stabbed in back
I read somewhere this am




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18348
    • View Profile
20 K at the border few days ago
« Reply #2454 on: September 24, 2021, 02:04:38 PM »
today the scum are showing us drone shots of same place with no one there.

amazing how fast things get done when it is for the Dem Party .

funny

"2,000" returned to Haiti

(small print -> round tickets provided )

and 20 ,000 disappear from border as of today

just like ballots
show up  and then disappear just like that
whenever needed

Cock roach Al got to border just in time to scream RACISM SLAVERY
  and arrest those white boys on horseback for doing their job and trying to protect our country when elites do not.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18348
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, and American Freedom
« Reply #2455 on: September 24, 2021, 02:11:01 PM »
so Del Rio looks a some land by a river - no mass crowds today

make bad visuals go away

and thus no media blitz with images of refugee camps
just move them to secret bunkers or food water health care stations that cannot be seen or ship them around the country to seed more future democrats around (and covid infections)

what disgusting lying democrat operatives
only dopes are being fooled
however there are enough of them

first on my mind known  as  - W
« Last Edit: September 24, 2021, 02:39:41 PM by ccp »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
You are watching the end of America
« Reply #2458 on: September 27, 2021, 12:36:36 PM »
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/395781.php

Being destroyed in front of us.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
Andrew McCarthy: Biden's immigration treachery
« Reply #2460 on: September 29, 2021, 07:54:34 PM »
I have taken the time to assemble some serious reading below. 



Note the dates of the three McCarthy articles.



The US v. AZ case is long, I post it here for Scalia's Dissent & Concurrence discussed by McCarthy in his 2012 article.


In my unhumble opinion, McCarthy is a fine legal mind and on the top of his game here about a matter of our national survival as America.

==========================



Article IV Section 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


=========================================

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/09/bidens-immigration-treachery-threatens-the-nation-not-just-national-security/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NR%20Daily%20Monday%20through%20Friday%202021-09-29&utm_term=NRDaily-Smart&fbclid=IwAR0x0tt0EdVmaYdwA53w1qnEC5E3Y5AesrtjqCnm_1Aa0loz5vyywBXC2bI


https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/08/why-the-border-crisis-is-here-to-stay/?fbclid=IwAR3-XTTuYiG1I5dO5bLadJQL4hR-QeP0LP_g9gCbld3Ch2dP1JmQEsL14EA

https://www.nationalreview.com/2012/07/sovereignty-preempted-andrew-c-mccarthy/?fbclid=IwAR0USveF_QtcTt8_KgWwsYOXampQpcIyzdiDuQdn-2zb8tpclPkOcpFrWeE
 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
« Last Edit: September 30, 2021, 07:25:17 AM by Crafty_Dog »



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18117
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, Lindsey Graham
« Reply #2463 on: October 04, 2021, 09:06:08 AM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/09/23/sen_graham_biden_has_surrendered_the_border_to_cartels_coyotes_and_human_smugglers.html

Good to see a GOP moderate pissed off at what is happening.  Any Dem moderates want to speak up?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, Lindsey Graham
« Reply #2464 on: October 04, 2021, 11:28:29 AM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/09/23/sen_graham_biden_has_surrendered_the_border_to_cartels_coyotes_and_human_smugglers.html

Good to see a GOP moderate pissed off at what is happening.  Any Dem moderates want to speak up?

It's the usual scam from Miss Lindsey. Talk tough to the press while voting along with the open borders uniparty.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
Re: Homeland Security, Border Protection, and American Freedom
« Reply #2467 on: October 08, 2021, 11:44:50 PM »
Fk.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: October 25, 2021, 03:59:25 PM by Crafty_Dog »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
MY
« Reply #2477 on: November 03, 2021, 10:42:20 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Weaponized migrants
« Reply #2479 on: November 05, 2021, 05:40:40 AM »


https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2021/11/belaruss-weaponized-migrants-offer-primer-gray-zone-warfare/186590/

"Consider the consequences for the United States should a Latin American government decide to weaponize migration."

Or that the dems already have.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18117
    • View Profile
Center Left 'The Economist' turns on Biden and the Democrats
« Reply #2483 on: November 18, 2021, 02:35:23 PM »
Why the situation on America’s southern border has become unmanageable
Democrats have not realised how serious the problem is

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/11/13/why-the-situation-on-americas-southern-border-has-become-unmanageable
--------------------------------------------------------------

The "problem" is intentional.  The political fallout is not. 

It could cost Beto his rightful place in the Governor Office.
--------------------------------------------------------------

From the article:
"The site has an air of abandonment, like a half-finished apartment building whose developer ran out of money. Thirty-foot (nine-metre) steel rods rise from the desert sand. The area has been electrified and prepared for floodlights, but only half a dozen have been installed, so most of the structure is bathed in darkness at night. Thanks to Donald Trump the border wall, of which this is part, has become a charged symbol of nativism and exclusion. But the design of this stretch, with slats spaced four inches apart to let people see through, is similar to the 128 miles of wall built during Barack Obama’s presidency, just taller. It was built hastily during the final months of Mr Trump’s term. Strewn nearby are steel piles of the old, shorter wall, which have yet to be hauled away.

President Joe Biden, who has not visited the southern border since 2008 [and won't be going there anytime soon], put a halt to all wall-construction on his first day in office. The wall here ends abruptly, in the middle of a mountain peak. Close by are several long gaps, where floodgates were planned to allow water to flow through during heavy rains. Time ran out, and they were never added. Instead, a few low boulders and a thin string of wire serve as hurdles. At one break, a dozen water bottles are littered on the sandy ground, a sign of migrants’ passage. “See, this is concerning for us,” says Jesus Vasavilbaso, who works for Customs and Border Patrol (cbp).   [The rest is paywall; don't bother click.]
------------------------------------------------------------

All they can hope for is that no one in narrative media covers it.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile





Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
WT:Biden appears to bend knee to court order requiring return to "Remain in Mex"
« Reply #2490 on: December 03, 2021, 03:04:58 AM »
Biden revives ‘Remain in Mexico’ rule

Reluctant move, even if temporary, angers immigrant advocates

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Mexico said Thursday that it will allow the restart of a Trump-era border policy that immediately sends illegal immigrants back across the boundary after the Department of Homeland Security announced it would speed up court hearings, offer vaccinations and help improve conditions for the migrants.

The Biden administration made clear it wasn’t happy about the move and was acting only under a court order to revive the program, officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols but commonly called the “Remain in Mexico” policy.

The U.S. will begin returning migrants early next week, Homeland Security said.

Instituted by the Trump administration, MPP helped resolve the 2019 border surge by discouraging bogus asylum claims. The Biden administration, calling the program cruel to migrants, halted it on Inauguration Day.

In separate statements Thursday, the two countries outlined the agreement to revive MPP.

Homeland Security said it is making “humanitarian” improvements to the program at Mexico’s request. It promised to try to finish court cases for those in MPP within six months and to ensure better access to legal assistance from Mexico.

New MPP enrollees will be offered COVID-19 vaccines. Homeland Security said it will pressure Mexico to improve safety at the shelters where MPP enrollees are encouraged to wait.

Given those promises, “for humanitarian reasons and on a temporary basis, the Government of Mexico has decided that it will not return to their

home countries certain migrants who have an appointment to appear before an immigration judge in the United States to request asylum there,” the Mexican Foreign Ministry said.

The move angered immigrant rights advocates.

The New York Immigration Coalition said restarting MPP “fundamentally betrays” President Biden’s promises to asylum seekers.

“This president decried the awful human cost of our border policies not long ago. But now, President Biden is doing little to reform and rebuild our current immigration system,” said Murad Awawdeh, the coalition’s executive director.

The American Immigration Council said the administration “has broken its promise” by restoring the MPP and said the program cannot be administered humanely.

“Today is a dark day for the United States and for the rule of law,” said Jorge Loweree, the council’s policy director.

Under MPP, illegal immigrants from beyond Mexico who jumped the border and attempted to make a claim in the U.S. were given notices of court dates and sent back to Mexico to wait.

The goal was to discourage bogus asylum applications that flooded the system when it became clear to migrants in Central America that they could arrive, make a claim and be released into the U.S. They could wait years, and sometimes legally hold jobs, before their cases would be heard.

Immigrant rights advocates said returning people to Mexico blocked some deserving applicants, left them vulnerable to abuse and in some cases denied them the chance to communicate with a lawyer or gain other assistance.

Activists compiled lists of thousands of cases of migrants enrolled in MPP who said they were robbed, beaten, raped or faced other struggles after they were sent back.

The Biden administration halted MPP in its early days, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas tried to revoke the program altogether in early June. But a federal judge ruled that Mr. Mayorkas cut too many corners in his decisionmaking and ordered him to make a “good-faith” effort to revive the program.

Mr. Mayorkas said he intends to cancel MPP and has issued a more detailed memo justifying that decision. The court’s injunction remains, so he is being forced to take steps to revive it.

About 68,000 people were put through the MPP from its 2019 start to its suspension by the Biden administration in January.

Though the number was small relative to the overall border traffi c, Trump officials said it sent a message to would-be migrants, and the flow of people slowed.

Mexico agreed to expand the MPP in 2019 under threat of crippling sanctions by President Trump. It deployed tens of thousands of national guard troops along routes used by Central American migrants to choke off the flow farther south.

With other steps to curtail asylum claims, those moves helped resolve the 2019 border surge.

The Biden administration has erased Trump policies, though a pandemic border shutdown known as Title 42 remains in place.

Under Title 42, Mexico generally allows the return of Spanishspeaking single adults and families without children younger than 7.


FLOODING THE SYSTEM: Migrants swarmed to the U.S. with the belief that they would be allowed to stay by claiming asylum, but the Homeland Security Department will begin returning them to Mexico. ASSOCIATED PRESS


U.S. asylum seekers will be blocked next week by the Migrant Protection Protocols. Immigration rights advocates say restarting the Trump-era policy “fundamentally betrays” President Biden’s promises. ASSOCIATED PRESS



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile
WT: Americans support border wall
« Reply #2493 on: December 08, 2021, 02:19:27 AM »


More Americans support building wall on southern border

Poll finds more believe it will solve illegal immigration issues

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Americans believe a border wall is part of the solution to illegal immigration and oppose the Biden administration’s plans to pay settlements to illegal immigrants whose families were separated after they jumped the border in the Trump era, according to a new poll taken for The Washington Times.

By better than 2-to-1 — 60% to 29% — voters disagreed with President Biden’s justification that the families suffered trauma and deserve taxpayers’ money as compensation. A stunning 47% “strongly” disagreed with the idea, swamping the 13% who strongly agreed.

And 53% said a border wall is “an effective way” to stop illegal immigration, compared to just 40% who disagreed.

But Americans signaled a generosity of spirit when it comes to immigrants who have been in the country a decade or more illegally without any serious legal entanglements. They “deserve a path to citizenship,” according to 59% of the voters polled.

The Times’ survey, conducted by OnMessage Inc. from Nov. 19 to Dec. 3, tested a wide range of hot-button issues, with a particular emphasis on immigration-related questions.

Support for the border wall was particularly striking.

It had been a winning position during the Bush and Obama years, but when thencandidate Donald Trump pushed the idea in 2015, support plummeted. When Gallup tested the issue in 2018, it found 57% opposed construction, and that deepened to 60% in 2019.

Now, though, with President Biden at the helm and halting wall construction, and with illegal immigration across the southern border hitting unprecedented levels, the barrier enjoys 13-point net positive support, at 53-40.

Republicans are strongly in favor, but so are nearly a third of Democrats.

Even among Hispanics — a community whose political leadership tilts Democratic and is vociferously opposed to the wall — about half said a wall would help control illegal immigration. About a third of Black voters supported the idea, too.

Nathan Klein, the pollster at OnMessage, said as the border numbers grew worse earlier this year under Mr. Biden, support for the wall rose.

That’s borne out by the 70% of voters in the survey who said the border situation is a “crisis,” including 60% of self-identified Democrats.

Mr. Biden and his team have rejected that term, suggesting this spring that what was going on at the border was “seasonal” and nothing out of the ordinary. As the numbers worsened over the summer, the administration pleaded for patience, saying it had a plan but it would take time to see results.

One plan Mr. Biden is already working on is paying thousands of illegal immigrant adults who were arrested and prosecuted for jumping the border under the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance border policy, then saw their children taken.

Because federal prisons don’t have family facilities, adults who arrived with children were separated, with the children put into shelters run by the federal Health and Human Services Department. But the administration lacked the capacity to reunite most of the families, and many parents were deported without their children.

Mr. Biden has said they deserve to be compensated for their trauma.

“If, in fact, because of the outrageous behavior of the last administration, you coming across the border, whether it was legally or illegally, and you lost your child — you lost your child. It’s gone — you deserve some kind of compensation, no matter what the circumstance,” the president said. “What that will be I have no idea. I have no idea.”

Three-fifths of voters disagreed, according to The Times’ poll.

The president’s plans for legalizing illegal immigrants fared better.

Nearly 3 in 5 voters said they would back citizenship rights for long-term illegal immigrants — those who have been in the country a decade — without running seriously afoul of the law. They have “earned a place here,” according to 59% of voters.

Even 42% of Republicans agreed with that idea.

Still, Americans are skeptical of allowing more people to come legally. By a 49-40 split, voters said the country “admits too many people, hurting Americans already looking for jobs.”

image

About 53% of people surveyed in a poll taken for The Washington Times said that a border wall is “an effective way” to stop illegal immigration, compared to 40% who disagreed. The findings mark a shift in attitudes about the controversial policy. ASSOCIATED PRESS


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18117
    • View Profile
Re: WT: Americans support border wall
« Reply #2494 on: December 08, 2021, 06:01:28 AM »
"53% said a border wall is “an effective way” to stop illegal immigration, compared to just 40% who disagreed."


The other 40% also know the border wall is effective at stopping illegal immigration and drugs and human trafficking and covid and terrorists coming across the border but don't want to.  There is something (everything) dishonest about that. 



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69113
    • View Profile



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18348
    • View Profile
DOJ upgrading curbs on "foreign agents"
« Reply #2499 on: December 16, 2021, 09:12:37 AM »
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/dec/9/justice-department-upgrading-curbs-foreign-influen/

seems like good thing

I hope this applies to illegals and maybe all non citizens ?