Author Topic: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America  (Read 63095 times)




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
Less Pilot Training, but TTPs
« Reply #453 on: June 11, 2024, 01:59:44 PM »



Less Pilot Training, but TTPs
interrogation by other means
CDR SALAMANDER
JUN 11

 https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4209ff4a-3bdb-4ab7-8655-3d09ec24f73a_1692x504.png?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

A lot of the reports on this story seem to be focused on the pilot training aspect of this, and … that is just plain missing the story.

There is a lot more here than just, “pilot training” - and much more dangerous. The PRC is a big nation with a big military. Basic pilot training is not all that difficult. I really doubt they are short instructor pilots - and neither should any retired military pilots.

There is a reason that for two decades we have discussed here the absolute strategic stupidity on our part allowing People’s Republic of China (PRC) passport holders to take so many of the post-graduate and doctoral position at our best research institutions of higher learning. They are almost all directly or indirectly under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

If you have not been to a graduation ceremony at a top-tier STEM university in the last 10 years, you cannot fully appreciate the absolute state of it all.

Admissions to the best positions at our best universities is a zero-sum game. Each bran you improve for the CCP is one less brain improved for the USA.

The PRC is not content with simple business snooping, military espionage, and wholesale intellectual capital theft. No … that is just a small part of a larger play.

They want to understand HOW we think, HOW we work, and the mechanisms and procedures we will use to fight. That way, they can copy what looks good - adopting without cost decades of trial and error development - and also have a better view of critical capabilities, vulnerabilities, etc.

Before I dive in to a 3,000-word Operational Planning overview - if you are not familiar with Vulnerability Assessment (I prefer this term now as the Cultural Marxists have ruined the phrase “Critical Analysis”), I’d like you to at least read RAND’s “Vulnerability Assessment Method Pocket Guide: A Tool for Center of Gravity Analysis”. If you have time, also look over Dr. Joe Strange, USMC War College, and Colonel Richard Iron, GBR A’s, “Understanding Centers of Gravity and Critical Vulnerabilities“ over at Australia’s The Forge, and then come back.

This should give you insight as to why the below would be of such value to the PRC and of such concern to the Five-Eyes nations;

China is continuing efforts to recruit Western military pilots to train its forces, often using privately-owned companies and “lucrative contracts” with vague terms to obscure the true customer.

That is the conclusion of a dossier released on 5 June by the so-called “Five Eyes” alliance, an intelligence sharing and collaboration partnership between the USA, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand.

While China’s efforts to use the expertise of Western aviators to benefit its own armed forces are not new, the intelligence summary offers new details about the programme.

“To overcome their shortcomings, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been aggressively recruiting Western military talent to train their aviators, using private firms around the globe that conceal their PLA ties and offer recruits exorbitant salaries,” says Michael Casey, director of the US National Counter Intelligence and Security Center.

Read the full dossier and then come back. It’s just a couple of pages. Yes, I know, I’m giving out a lot of homework, but this is more important than is being led on.

The PLA wants the skills and expertise of these individuals to make its own military air operations more capable while gaining insight into Western air tactics, techniques, and procedures.

They are after our intellectual property, and they will pay handsomely for it.

Why make the effort to recruit serving officers as spies when you can simply buy their brains after they retire?

How do you counter this?

One action Five-Eyes should look at is the peer-pressure aspect of most people in aviation. I am sure they know who is working for these PRC front companies and allowing their honor to be purchased.

Name them and shame them. That would help put a disincentive in play while the law catches up. Give them 2-weeks notice they are going to be named, and if they stay, well, that’s on them.

Just an idea.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3226
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #454 on: June 11, 2024, 04:21:01 PM »
Re the above: citing budget pressures state funded colleges endlessly pursue “out of state” students as they pay many times the in-state tuition, and this goes more so for international students that often require ESL and other help schools can charge what the market will bear for, while even private institutions love the international gravy train, particularly if some sort of nudge nudge totally unrelated contribution is involved. Bottom line, should any sort of reduction in Chinese grad or other students be demanded anticipate autistic screeching about stretched thin college budgets from the usual suspects.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2024, 06:58:54 PM by Body-by-Guinness »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #455 on: June 11, 2024, 06:56:49 PM »
Yes.

I made some comment about the Chinese in the context of the Wuhan Virus when I was teaching at UNC Pembroke and the Dept Chair had a cow.


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3226
    • View Profile
Chinese Drones Phone Home?
« Reply #457 on: June 20, 2024, 12:38:19 PM »
China is a major maker of drones, but what they collect and share with their Chinese military hardware manufacturer companies isn’t well understood or appreciated:

China’s drones are its greatest weapon in today’s information warfare
The Hill News / by Rob Joyce / Jun 20, 2024 at 8:47 AM

I’ve spent a career studying and mitigating threats from our most significant adversaries, and it is clear the growing threat from Chinese-made drones is dire and underappreciated.

I couldn’t be happier to see members of Congress working across the aisle to rid the U.S. of these dangerous products. Across my decades of public service, including as the acting homeland security adviser for the U.S. National Security Council and director of cybersecurity for the National Security Agency, I recognize urgent threats to our nation when I see them. Chinese drones are one of the most significant intelligence and national security threats we currently face as a country.

When it comes to national security, drones have changed the game.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine demonstrates the expansive and exceptional capabilities of both large and small drones. The world has awakened to the power of these technical marvels. From the war’s earliest days, drones played a key role as intelligence collectors, becoming deadly spotters for artillery and irreplaceable for understanding adversary movements.

Drone tradecraft rapidly evolved, making them hyper-accurate explosive delivery systems in their own right. The Ukrainians made massive innovations in their employment, including how they replace artillery and mortars and even using their footage for real-time information operations. Future conflicts will never be the same.

Today, drones have become ubiquitous in conflict zones across the world. They formed part of the barrage Iran fired at Israel in April. They’ve breached South Korean airspace. Both sides in Sudan’s ongoing civil war are deploying them. Houthi rebels are strapping bombs to drones as a menace to Red Sea shipping.

That’s precisely why it’s a problem that China currently controls the drone marketplace, with companies like Da Jiang Innovations (which the Department of Defense has deemed a Chinese military company) and Autel Robotics accounting for more than half of global sales. China is rapidly advancing both the capabilities of these drones and their national capacity to manufacture them. We will continue to lag behind without a trusted and independent supply chain.

This year, the U.S. government sounded the alarm about China’s efforts to pre-position cyber attack capability in our civilian critical infrastructure. So while U.S. businesses and hobbyists are legitimately using these Chinese-made drones to image and map our critical infrastructure, the data they accrue is still at risk for exploitation in the same Chinese preparations for conflict.

Because of China’s strict Military Civil Fusion data-sharing requirements, there is no daylight between Chinese companies and the Chinese Communist Party — especially ones like Da Jiang Innovations, which receives direct funding from the Chinese government. All the information these drones are soaking up is available on demand to China’s intelligence apparatus. 

And make no mistake about it: the CCP uses its industry to its advantage.

In 2017, customs authorities accused Da Jiang Innovations of passing along sensitive information about American infrastructure. In 2022, lawmakers received a series of classified briefings where they reportedly learned that hundreds of drones had breached restricted airspace in Washington, D.C., including near the White House and Pentagon.

Then, in January 2024, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and FBI warned that China “has enacted laws that provide the government with expanded legal grounds for accessing and controlling data held by firms in China” and that the “use of Chinese-manufactured [unmanned aerial systems] in critical infrastructure operations risks exposing sensitive information to [Chinese] authorities.”

The more U.S. companies — especially those involved in sectors like construction, communications and transportation — introduce drones into their daily operations, the greater the risk.

Companies cannot simply vet their drones’ software to ensure they’re not calling home to Beijing, either. As the agencies note, “updates controlled by Chinese entities could introduce unknown data collection and transmission capabilities without the user’s awareness.” All it would take is a few keystrokes to turn a harmless drone into a highly effective espionage device.

Additionally, Beijing intimately understands what is collected, along with where and how it is stored. That’s a tremendous advantage for the country, even if the data they desire is not initially transmitted back to China.

Congress enacted important restrictions on using Chinese-manufactured drones in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act. Starting in December 2025, federal funds can’t be used to purchase drones made in China, Russia, Iran or North Korea, and drones that use certain components made in those countries.

This is a good start to help the supply chain issue, but it is not enough to address the present risk they pose.

Thankfully, Democratic and Republican lawmakers are again uniting to resolve this issue.

The bipartisan Countering CCP Drones Act, which is working its way through the House of Representatives, would ban future licensing of Da Jiang Innovations technologies for use on U.S. communications infrastructure.
 
Republican New York Rep. Elise Stefanik called the bill “a win for America’s national security and a win for Americans whose data and critical infrastructure has been collected and monitored by our adversary Communist China.” It also drew praise from Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), who said the legislation would “protect our communications equipment while strengthening American supply chains.” For all these reasons, the legislation currently boasts an impressive list of Democratic and Republican co-sponsors.

Keeping this country safe in the coming decades will mean developing our own military technologies and tactics as we advance the art of drone warfare. But it will also mean recognizing the threat of drone-based espionage. We wouldn’t willingly give our greatest rival air superiority in wartime. We shouldn’t do it in peacetime, either.

Kudos to the members of Congress who have demonstrated such wisdom and foresight in introducing and pushing this bill. We’ll all be better off because of it.

Rob Joyce is a cybersecurity leader with more than 34 years in the intelligence community. Previously, he served as acting homeland security adviser and special assistant to the president on the U.S. National Security Council, and as director of cybersecurity for the National Security Agency.

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4730109-china-drones-intelligence-weapon/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
FO
« Reply #458 on: June 28, 2024, 08:59:06 AM »


(4) LEFT WING PROTESTS AGAINST RIMPAC MILITARY EXERCISE: Multiple left wing protest groups are organizing a protest called “Cancel RIMPAC” against the Rim of the Pacific military exercise. Protest events will be held on 29 and 30 June in San Diego, CA.
One anti-war organization calls for the end of U.S. military expansion in the Pacific and previously protested U.S. involvement in Balikatan, the annual joint exercise with the Philippines.

Why It Matters: The U.S. has a historic anti-war movement, which at times has been aided or driven by foreign powers. It’s possible that the protests against U.S. military exercises in the Indo-Pacific theater are driven by pro-Chinese interests. An Army security report from December 2020, for instance, warned that foreign powers, without specifically naming China, would seek both “conventional and unconventional” means against the United States, to include the use of protest organizations. The U.S. Pacific Fleet and Naval Special Warfare Center is based out of Naval Base San Diego, while four SEAL teams are based out of nearby Coronado, which, in a time of crisis or conflict, could be disrupted by anti-war protest organizations. We’ve previously and repeatedly warned about the potential for disruption to mobilization, deployment, and even base security through foreign-backed sabotage or proxy actors. – M.S.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
Commerce Dept black lists four companies
« Reply #460 on: July 04, 2024, 10:26:49 AM »
BTW, working from memory, one of President Clinton's tricks in return for $345k in cash from Bernie Schwarz of Loral Satellites was to move approval process for helping China better launch his satellites from State Dept (which uses security criteria) to Commerce Dept-- which tends not to.

Also note that a related misdirect was used by Hillary on the Uranium One deal, on which she signed off as Sec State by saying that many other Dept signed off too-- the misdirect being that her State Dept was the one responsible for applying national security criteria.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/commerce-blacklists-4-companies-for-training-chinese-military-pilots-5679490?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2024-07-03&src_cmp=gv-2024-07-03&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYvAqcwcVzc7PzLYPrHFRB710wA0AIj31kx5JTWZu9FddhEg4S8RP

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
FO: Chinese Cranes
« Reply #461 on: July 04, 2024, 01:06:27 PM »
(4) PORTS SAY CHINA CRANE TARIFF A GRAVE THREAT: Port owners in California, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia urged the Biden administration to reconsider a proposed 25% tariff on Chinese-made ship-to-shore cranes in a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai.
American Association of Port Authorities CEO Cary Davis said the tariff will not meet its stated objective but “will only result in negative outcomes, including grave harm to port efficiency and capacity, strained supply chains, increased consumer prices, and a weaker U.S. economy.”
Why It Matters: The proposed tariff on Chinese-made ZPMC cranes will likely cause disruptions in port development and shipping, as the ports say. However, the ZPMC ship-to-shore cranes pose a significant cyber threat to U.S. supply chains. China-linked hacking groups could use the networked cranes to disrupt port operations and also use the cranes as nodes to conduct cyber attacks against other targets, including trucks using federally mandated mileage trackers. – R.C.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
China increasing Penetration of American infrastructure
« Reply #462 on: July 08, 2024, 09:06:21 AM »
(2) NEW FED WARNING CONFIRMS CHINA COMPROMISED INFRASTRUCTURE: In a new report released on 7 July, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), and FBI said they confirmed that People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-sponsored hackers had compromised the networks of multiple critical infrastructure operators.

According to the joint report, the agencies confirmed that China-linked hackers conducted network reconnaissance and exfiltrated data intended to cause physical disruptions to critical infrastructure operational technology.

Why It Matters: Federal officials are increasingly warning that China-linked hackers are preparing to strike in the event of a crisis between the U.S. and China. Hackers accessing chemical security information, including site vulnerability assessments and security plans, points to the likelihood that foreign adversaries intend to conduct both cyberattacks and physical sabotage to disrupt U.S. critical infrastructure. And their target set likely includes agricultural facilities, in addition to power, water, and communications. Taken together with other developments, it appears China is preparing to conduct a first strike, combining cyber and physical sabotage in the event of a crisis or conflict. – R.C.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
Feds begin doing something about fgn land buys near bases
« Reply #463 on: July 11, 2024, 06:21:32 AM »
I note that these regs (and it sounds like in many cases it will take quite some time to get them up and running) are enabled by a 2018 (i.e. Trump) law.

https://amgreatness.com/2024/07/11/new-federal-rule-implemented-to-protect-military-bases-from-foreign-land-purchases/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
FO: Is this any way to fight an adversary?
« Reply #464 on: July 11, 2024, 08:53:09 AM »
second

(1) BIDEN LEANS INTO CHINA TRADE WAR, WHILE INSTITUTIONS PROP CHINA UP: White House National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard announced on Wednesday that the Biden administration will impose a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum from China shipped through Mexico.

According to a preliminary paper from defense software company Govini, Chinese suppliers in U.S. supply chains quadrupled from 2005 to 2020, and U.S. dependence on Chinese microelectronics grew by 600% from 2014 to 2020.

The authors also found that 40% of the semiconductors that sustain U.S. defense systems and infrastructure, like the B2 bomber and Patriot missile system, are dependent on Chinese suppliers.

During a House Financial Services Committee hearing, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) said China is now the largest creditor of the developing world while also remaining one of the largest annual borrowers from the World Bank. And the Biden administration is failing to leverage U.S. leadership at international financial institutions to block money flowing to the Chinese Communist Party.

During the same hearing, Rep. Erin Houchin (R-IN) said the World Bank is “empowering China and its efforts to expand its geopolitical influence” by buying Chinese energy components for developing country energy projects.

Why It Matters: The bottom-line-up-front appears to be that the U.S. is financing China’s rise as a defense production power, and financing China’s geopolitical influence campaign, while the U.S. defense industrial base is struggling to supply key munitions and systems to allies. The tariffs targeting the transshipment of Chinese steel and aluminum are preliminary, anticipating that Chinese overproduction will flood the U.S. market with cheap steel and aluminum and another move toward a trade war by the Biden administration. However, this seems miniscule in comparison to how much U.S. money is flowing to Chinese defense production due to U.S. reliance on Chinese components and U.S.-led international financial institutions’ loans and energy infrastructure component purchases also flowing to China. – R.C.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
You can't go to war with your factory
« Reply #465 on: August 16, 2024, 11:52:32 AM »
https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/p/you-cant-go-to-war-with-your-factory?publication_id=247761&post_id=146846953&isFreemail=true&r=z2120&triedRedirect=true 

(Important graphs/charts in the original)

You Can't go to War With Your Factory
...no one can, or should, defend this

CDR Salamander
Aug 14, 2024
Back in March, Joshua Steinman made a simple request of us all:

If you pay attention to one tech twitter chart this week, I beg you, make it this one

What chart was he referring to?

Image
As Balaji let us know last month:

"The report was issued by Arlington, VA-based Govini which was awarded a five-year $400 million contract from the Pentagon in 2019 to deliver data, analysis and insights into DoD spending, supply chain and acquisition"

I forgot about both the report and the amount of money we - yes kiddies, we - paid for it. Nice snag by their Board of Directors, and … I hope their graphics department was well paid, because this report, now five years old, has some good ones.

I hope we got a lot more than a 12-page document for $400 million. You paid for it, so go here and download your copy.

As I was mowing the yard - wonderful therapy that is in 95 degree heat at 6pm with 85% humidity - it popped in to my head this simple fact; all this talk here and elsewhere of a long awaited ‘Pacific Pivot’ to get ready for a ‘Great Pacific War’ sometime in the Davidson Window™ against the People’s Republic of China … is it all just delusional?

Has the talk about “72-hr Wars” not so much a grand idea - but a requirement? How do we go to war with the same nation who we cannot produce weapons without their factories?

As a Southerner, going to war against your own industrial center is a Lesson Learned, and yet here we are.

Here’s another ponderable chart;

Image
Just look at it. The implications are so … well … shocking that they don’t seem to quite sink in.

This report was funded in 2019 and delivered in 2024, 150% of the time it took for the USA to defeat Imperial Japan in the Pacific.

As such, a lot of that data is reward looking. It begs the question, what progress has been made in the last 5 years to wean ourselves off of relying on our greatest opponent on the world stage?


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19752
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #467 on: September 04, 2024, 06:09:25 AM »
" Chinese Spamoflage-- fake social media accounts "

Sounds like Russian disinformation  :wink:

That would be what Hollywood and all the tech CEOs invested in CCP would say in response to this.

Russia => BAD

China => threat exaggerated or ignored.





Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
FO: Chinese-Russian Penetration of American Uranium supplies
« Reply #472 on: September 18, 2024, 02:04:35 PM »
(6) U.S. PROBES INTO NUCLEAR SUPPLY VULNERABILITIES: The Biden Administration announced an investigation into U.S. imports of Chinese enriched uranium due to concerns that China is helping Russia work around sanctions.
China’s imports to the U.S. went from zero in 2022 to 535,700 pounds in May 2023, the beginning of the U.S. ban on importing Russian uranium.
Why It Matters: If the U.S. is indirectly importing Russian enriched uranium and using China to do it, this makes U.S. nuclear power, carrier, submarine, and missile production partially dependent on two potentially hostile powers, undermining national and energy security. – J.V.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19752
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #474 on: September 19, 2024, 06:35:29 AM »
"The seizure follows increased statements of concern about the security of the “internet of things,” such as routers and surveillance cameras. Industry experts have been pressing for accountability by manufacturers, especially for older devices that keep functioning after updates and other support have been cut off."

I wonder how much of this is rigged IT that we buy from China.

Not surprising some of the spies are bribed American citizens.  One got 10 yrs === > not enough as for me.
Should be life or execution.

I read with counterfeit coins most of the coins that come from China are entered into the market by bribed Americans.

We need to get MORE serious with white collar crime!
I said this for yrs.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile
WT: Backdoor to US University Tech
« Reply #475 on: September 24, 2024, 07:52:11 AM »


U.S. university tech research opens back door to China

‘Sophisticated system’ circumvents blacklist

By Guy Taylor THE WASHINGTON TIMES

China is exploiting U.S. government-funded research and partnerships between American and Chinese universities — including some with explicit links to the Chinese military — to gain “back-door access” to insights on advanced technology breakthroughs, according to a new congressional report reviewed by The Washington Times.

The report was produced by Republicans on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party. It focuses specifically on the transfer of technology research with sensitive defense applications.

“Hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. federal research funding over the last decade” have helped the Chinese Communist Party “achieve advancements in dual-use, critical, and emerging technologies like hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence, fourth generation nuclear weapons technology and semiconductor technology,” states a summary of the report.

The full report was set to be released later Monday. According to the summary, the document uncovers a “sophisticated system” through which China is transferring critical U.S. technologies and

expertise to entities on a Commerce Department blacklist that are “linked to China’s defense and security apparatus.”

The document does not say any American universities or researchers have broken laws but asserts that a “lack of legal guardrails around federally funded research” has played directly into China’s strategic goal of outpacing the U.S. and its allies in the race to dominate emerging technology.

Investigators focused specifically on research publications that have disclosed funding from the Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence community. They also included collaboration between U.S. researchers and researchers affiliated with Chinese institutions and universities.

“The purpose that research funding is to generate advancements that will eventually become applied warfighting and intelligence capabilities to protect America against adversarial nations,” the summary of the report states. “Yet the research that the [Department of Defense] and the [intelligence community] are funding is providing back-door access to the very foreign adversary nation whose aggression these capabilities are necessary to protect against.”

Investigators say they identified nearly 9,000 research publications supported by Defense Department funding and published with co-authors affiliated with Chinese government-linked institutions, as well as 185 publications supported by funding from U.S. intelligence agencies.

The report’s summary refers to China by its formal name, the People’s Republic of China, or PRC, and the Chinese military as the People’s Liberation Army, or PLA. “More than 2,000 DOD-funded papers included PRC [co-authors] who were directly affiliated with the PRC’s defense research and industrial base,” it states. “Some topics have direct military applications — such as high-performance explosives, tracking of targets, and drone operation networks — that the PLA would use against the U.S. military in the event of a conflict.”

With regard to circumventing U.S. government blacklists, the report describes a system through which Beijing uses “joint institutes between U.S. research universities and universities and other entities” inside China as a “guise of academic cooperation.”

Investigators highlight three such joint institutes: the Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (TBSI), which involves a partnership between the University of California, Berkeley, and Shenzen Institute in China; the Georgia Tech Shenzhen Institute (GTSI); and the Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute (SCUPI).

“These joint institutes facilitate the transfer of expertise, applied research, and technologies related to dual-use, critical, and emerging technologies to the PRC,” the report’s summary states. “Through these institutes, participating American academics, many of whom conduct U.S. federally-funded research, travel to the PRC to collaborate on research, advise PRC scholars, teach and train PRC graduate students, and collaborate with PRC companies on their areas of expertise — frequently, critical and emerging technologies with national security implications.

“While doing so, academics typically maintain affiliations with their U.S. institutions, and many continue to lead U.S. federally funded R& D projects. This creates a direct pipeline for the transfer of the benefit of their research expertise to the PRC.”

The summary notes that after months of “productive engagement” with the House Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Select Committee on the CCP, Georgia Tech recently terminated GTSI and curtailed its partnership with China’s Tianjin University.

Berkeley has also “informed the Committees that it ‘has started the process of relinquishing all ownership’ in TBSI, and is ‘in the early stages of unwinding the joint legal entity,’” states the summary of the report, which described the developments and steps in the right direction.

A statement published on Georgia Tech’s website this month announced the termination and acknowledged that Tianjin University has been on the Commerce Department’s blacklist since 2020. “Given Georgia Tech’s extensive role in national security, it immediately began conducting a thorough review of all its activities and partnerships in China,” Georgia Tech wrote in a statement dated Sept. 6.

“To date, Tianjin University remains on the Entity List, making Georgia Tech’s participation with Tianjin University, and subsequently GTSI, no longer tenable,” the statement said. “The approximately 300 admitted students currently in degree programs at GTSI will have the opportunity to fulfill their degree requirements.”

Rep. John Moolenaar, Michigan Republican and chairman of the Select Committee on the CCP, said in a statement that “Georgia Tech did the right thing for U.S. national security by shutting down its PRC-based joint institute, and U.C. Berkeley and other universities should follow suit.”

“We also must ban research collaboration with blacklisted entities, enact stricter guardrails on emerging technology research, and hold American universities accountable through passing the Deterrent Act,” Mr. Moolenaar said. He was referring to legislation that aims to expand federal government oversight and U.S. university disclosure requirements relating to foreign sources and institutes of higher education.

The legislation was passed by the House last year and is awaiting action in the Senate.

Rep. Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Republican and chair of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, also called for the Deterrent Act to be made law.

She said in a statement that her committee has for years “pushed for greater transparency regarding foreign investment in American universities.”

“This investigation just further proved why it’s necessary,” Ms. Foxx said. “Our research universities have a responsibility to avoid any complicity in the CCP’s atrocious human rights abuses or attempts to undermine our national security.”

The New York Times, which first reported on the joint congressional report on Monday, said Georgia Tech and Berkeley had disputed many of the report’s findings.

The newspaper also reported that it had received a statement Friday from Berkeley, saying it had decided to terminate its ownership in the Chinese Institution, partly because of its lack of visibility into research by affiliates of other institutions.

The joint congressional report, meanwhile, cited failures in the reporting of foreign funding by U.C. Berkeley and Georgia Tech under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act.

The report’s summary also criticized the Biden administration. “Enforcement of foreign gift and contract reporting requirements by the Biden-Harris Department of Education has been an abject failure,” the report’s summary states. “And the Biden-Harris Department of Education has failed to open a single enforcement action under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act in the last four years, despite widespread evidence of lack of reporting.

“These undisclosed foreign gifts — likely hundreds of millions, if not billions in total — give PRC entities troubling influence without transparency and contribute to building the research relationships that pose risks to U.S. national security,” it states. “Stronger safeguards and more robust enforcement is urgently required.”

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19752
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #476 on: September 24, 2024, 10:43:35 AM »
" China is exploiting U.S. government-funded research and partnerships between American and Chinese universities — including some with explicit links to the Chinese military — to gain “back-door access” to insights on advanced technology breakthroughs, according to a new congressional report reviewed by The Washington Times."

Old news.
But nothing ever changes.

My question:

HAVE WE EVER GAINED ANY KNOWLEDGE FOR ANYTHING FROM THE CHINESE?

THEY STEAL ALL OURS AND WHAT DO WE GET BACK?  ANYTHING?

I have never read anything we ever get from them other then they found a new dinosaur or something of minimal consequence.

What great technology comes from China other than cheap rigged stuff?




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19752
    • View Profile
Re: China Chinese Penetration and Invasion of America
« Reply #478 on: September 24, 2024, 12:41:21 PM »
how stupid is this.

we have relied on rare metal imports from our leading adversary

our leaders failed us again

OMFG read this

look at the other top producers in the world and the top reserves:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimony

 :x


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3226
    • View Profile
China’s Unabashed Penetration of the US
« Reply #480 on: October 26, 2024, 04:04:30 PM »
Not only are they not shy when it comes to espionage, the current admin hasn’t done much about it, hmm:

Voters: Beware the government’s China problem at home and abroad
The Hill News / by Erik Durneika / Oct 26, 2024 at 1:10 PM

The Chinese Communist Party’s influence is alive and well in the U.S.

Political scandals have reignited concerns over Beijing’s overseas campaign. Examples include the charging of an unregistered Chinese state agent working as a top aide for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) and foreign agents affiliated with a Chinese Communist Party-linked electrical vehicle battery company making contributions to Democratic campaigns.

Although it has been framed as such, this is not a recent issue either. In 2018, it came to light that the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) had employed an unidentified Chinese agent for nearly 20 years at her field office.

These Chinese agents and lobbyists have sought not only to promote China’s interests and repair its image abroad but have also aimed to censor topics that the Chinese Communist Party deems controversial, such as discussions about Taiwan’s sovereignty and the treatment of the Uyghurs, labeled by various governments and organizations as a genocide.

This exportation of censorship is clearly an attack on one of American democracy’s most prized tenets: the freedom of speech and expression.

Perhaps even more concerning are the alleged ties between the Chinese Communist Party and Minnesota Gov. and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Walz (D), detailed in a recent letter and subpoena by the House Oversight Committee.

He is running for the second-highest office in the federal government — one that closely advises the president and often acts as a representative of the country when meeting with foreign dignitaries. This comes after his false claims over his whereabouts during the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre and his sympathetic statements about Chinese communism .

The Chinese government continues to harass and repress dissidents, many of whom are U.S. citizens, and run espionage operations in their communities. Such operations may utilize Chinese police stations located in five states.

Beyond politics, the Chinese government's influence is seeping into our educational system, from elementary schools to universities. It has contributed to and funded anti-Jewish fervor on college campuses, poses a risk to our critical defense infrastructure and is largely fueling the nation’s opioid and illegal marijuana production, which is intertwined with concerns over human and labor trafficking. And there is much more to this list.

The foreign policy that a given administration adopts will sway not only the actions of this authoritarian regime with respect to its own citizens but will also affect the extent to which such foreign infiltration succeeds on U.S. soil.

These instances of continued — and intensified — intrusion using psychological warfare, espionage, election interference and hard money show that the traditional distinction between foreign policy and domestic issues is outmoded. Foreign policy has immense potential to shape a country — socially, politically, fiscally and in terms of security.

Luckily, this election cycle, polling indicates that more American voters are paying attention to foreign policy than previously. About 4 in 10 voters now view foreign policy as a top concern, with registered Republicans expressing more interest in this issue than registered Democrats. The same poll reveals the current percentage of U.S. adults who want the government to focus on foreign policy is up from 18 percent in 2023.

This increase in attention to foreign policy comes at a time when inter-state wars have increased as well, and their fiscal implications are undeniable, as exemplified by the substantial spending on a seemingly unending war in Ukraine — funds that could be rediverted to local communities and disaster relief in the U.S. in the presence of decisive political leadership. This war is also contributing to inflation.

Despite its recent traction, foreign policy should continue gaining momentum among voters in subsequent elections — and must not be forgotten. It is an issue area that deserves consideration among bread-and-butter issues like taxation, education and drug addiction, as it can have a bearing on them.

Unmitigated Chinese Communist Party influence, however, also poses long-term dangers to our democracy. The Chinese party-state’s influence in the U.S. extends to political and non-political areas of life, affecting how safe people feel articulating their views and citizens’ trust in elections at all levels of government. Each of these corresponds to a different facet of American democracy — the freedom of speech and assembly and free and fair elections.

Foreign adversaries’ plans to incite political violence, such as through assassination plots, further degrade the fabric of our political system and contribute to societal upheaval.

On the other hand, efforts by media outlets and some elected officials to vilify domestic conservative groups as threats to democracy are unproductive and serve politically motivated purposes. Such incendiary rhetoric overlooks the oversized risk that China and other external actors, like Iran, pose to the health of U.S. democracy as well as to the immediate safety of the U.S. citizenry. China and like adversaries are also sure to reap benefits from this type of division.

If the public turns a blind eye to the Chinese government’s actions within our borders and to the broader implications of foreign policy on domestic security, who will pay attention? What will happen? The answer to the former question is uncertain while the response to the latter is slightly clearer: The situation is bound to worsen.

Erik Durneika is a graduate teaching assistant at the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Political Science. He has done work for the Uyghur Human Rights Project and served as a distinguished visiting researcher at National Taiwan University’s Research and Educational Center for China Studies and Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations.

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4953307-chinese-communist-party-influence-us/


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72241
    • View Profile