Author Topic: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues; foreign manipulation of US media/social media  (Read 1150178 times)

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3851 on: June 05, 2023, 06:21:00 AM »
I presume they teach this to the MBA candidates

business management classes

the woke adoption takes it a step further - either play along or be fired .


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: They are always waging psychological warfare on us
« Reply #3852 on: June 05, 2023, 06:45:38 AM »
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/govt-nudge-units-find-best-ways-manipulate-public

"Nudge" sounds nicer.

Brings back memories of early "nudge" and expising the slippery slope argument against slippery slope arguments.

"Don't Nudge Me There.". WSJ 2013. Sadly prescient. Cass Sunstein, Obama official and author of 2008 book called "Nudge" writes a supportive NYT book review about "Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism". Right at the heart of today's Leftism.

https://firehydrantoffreedom.com/index.php?topic=2177.msg100236#msg100236

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: They are always waging psychological warfare on us
« Reply #3853 on: June 05, 2023, 07:07:03 AM »
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/govt-nudge-units-find-best-ways-manipulate-public

"Nudge" sounds nicer.

Brings back memories of early "nudge" and expising the slippery slope argument against slippery slope arguments.

"Don't Nudge Me There.". WSJ 2013. Sadly prescient. Cass Sunstein, Obama official and author of 2008 book called "Nudge" writes a supportive NYT book review about "Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism". Right at the heart of today's Leftism.

https://firehydrantoffreedom.com/index.php?topic=2177.msg100236#msg100236

Yup

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3854 on: June 06, 2023, 01:17:13 AM »
IIRC Glen Beck called Cass Sunstein "the most dangerous man in America".

Refresh my memory, who was his wife?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3855 on: June 06, 2023, 05:26:55 AM »
IIRC Glen Beck called Cass Sunstein "the most dangerous man in America".

Refresh my memory, who was his wife?

SaMANtha “Conan O’Brian in drag” Power

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3856 on: June 06, 2023, 05:28:10 AM »
Doggie treat for GM!




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Madcow up
« Reply #3860 on: June 07, 2023, 05:43:07 AM »
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cable-news-ratings-monday-june-3-maddow-boosts-msnbc-to-prime-time-win-over-fox-and-cnn/

as the numbers of LBDjgipgrejs+ go up so does Madcow's

the religion of woke is taking over

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
corrupt media
« Reply #3861 on: June 09, 2023, 07:45:45 AM »
pravda media:

"HOUSE REPUBLICANS attack Biden and his family after viewing FBI document"

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-attack-biden-family-viewing-fbi-document-rcna88413

honest media :

"Joe Biden allegedly paid $5M by Burisma executive as part of a bribery scheme, according to FBI document"

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
this is how Conservatives should ALWAYS deal with MSM
« Reply #3863 on: June 11, 2023, 04:02:12 PM »
https://nypost.com/2023/06/11/sen-lindsey-graham-barks-at-george-stephanopoulos-during-trump-indictment-interview/

stop being their stooge, shill
probably their is a better word for it but I cannot think of it now

fools like Christie, Hutchison, Kinzinger promoting themselves are just that : fools



 



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3866 on: June 14, 2023, 08:23:17 AM »
"Not until paragraph six, however, did the author reveal that these bomb threats that were emailed to news outlets in multiple states “accused the retail chain of betraying the LGBTQ+ community.”

 :x

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3869 on: June 16, 2023, 01:21:15 PM »
wow
so what say you, Sean, Laura , Bret, Martha, Waters et al?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3870 on: June 16, 2023, 01:48:54 PM »
That the strength of their ratings protects them.

For example, today Martha went hard after the LA Dodgers and the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3871 on: June 16, 2023, 02:01:13 PM »
agreed

but I must be missing something

how much money are these corporations actually making by going along with this religion of WOKE?

are they really getting the kind of pressure which is carrots or sticks
or "deal no one can refuse?"

I just don't get how the CEOS as all in

 :-o

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
can anyone tell the difference here ?
« Reply #3872 on: June 16, 2023, 02:05:29 PM »
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7413391/mediaviewer/rm137229569?ref_=nmmi_mi_all_pbl_12

https://www.npr.org/2022/09/15/1123133769/cnn-morning-show-don-lemon-kaitlan-collins

I think they are the same - one day decides to be a man ;
next the other - depending on which scam they need to perpetuate that day.

 :wink:

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Matt Walsh: FOX goes full DEI
« Reply #3873 on: June 17, 2023, 12:12:12 AM »
The Matt Walsh Report
The Betrayal At Fox News Is Even Worse Than We Imagined

For 120 straight weeks, Fox News was the most-watched cable news network in primetime. Its main competitors, MSNBC and CNN, never came close. In the key advertising demographic — people between the ages of 25 and 54 — Fox News was the undisputed leader.

But last week, after nearly two months of declining ratings following the ouster of Tucker Carlson, Fox News’ streak came to an abrupt and very unceremonious end. Last Friday, Fox News recorded its worst performance in primetime in the network's history. Just 109,000 people between the ages of 25 to 54 tuned into Tucker Carlson's old 8:00p.m. time slot, to watch the replacement show "Fox News Tonight."

How bad is that? To put it in context, "Fox News Tonight" was ranked 41st out of all cable news shows on Friday. This is the time slot that used to routinely be ranked number one. Now YouTube streams of people playing with Legos get more viewers. And keep in mind — Fox News attracted those 109,000 viewers on a very busy news night, after the announcement of Donald Trump’s indictment. Not many people cared what Fox News anchors had to say about the indictment of a presidential frontrunner.

Whatever you make of that, it’s clear that the implosion of Fox News is well underway. And it’s showing no signs of stopping. This week, as Tucker discussed on his Twitter show Thursday, Fox News executives publicly condemned a veteran producer who wrote a banner criticizing Joe Biden. Five years ago, the banner wouldn’t have attracted any attention whatsoever. But under the current leadership at Fox News, it led to the producer leaving the network within 48 hours. Here’s Tucker:

Clip 1

That banner is the most interesting thing that’s happened in that time slot for about two months, so of course Fox News cracks down on it. What’s happening at Fox feels familiar. The network is on the same trajectory we saw with Bud Light, then Target. Fox News executives, for some reason, are destroying their own product, and now they've lost the trust of their customer base. They didn’t just fire their top-performing host in the single most important hour in television, without providing any justification for it. Now they’re punishing producers too. They’ve also been relentlessly promoting transgenderism across all their platforms. They’ve made Caitlyn Jenner one of their top contributors. In every article about Dylan Mulvaney, or any other trans activist, they diligently make sure to respect their preferred pronouns.

Fox News’ parent company, Fox Corporation, is even sponsoring a pride parade. All of this is driving Fox News’ viewers away. It’s hard not to wonder what’s happening at Fox News, and whether there’s any chance the company —– which was once trusted by millions of people —– can ever recover.

We just obtained a series of internal documents from Fox News employees that illustrate how deep the rot goes, and how unsalvageable the whole organization truly is. These are documents that are produced by Fox Corporation, and presented to Fox News employees when they login to their employee portal. Any Fox News employee can access them. I encourage you to read the entire thread on Twitter and get all the facts on the story. I must warn you, though, what we found included very sexually explicit content. I don’t have to tell you that I have a lot to say about that.

The documents show that the leadership of Fox Corporation despises their viewers, and everything they stand for. This is a company that abhors not only traditional values, but also basic human decency, it would seem. Am I overstating things? Let's see. In honor of Pride Month, Fox Corporation is now encouraging employees of Fox News to read literature about “glory holes.” You read that right. These are literal holes in restroom walls where men anonymously receive oral sex. Fox's executives want their employees to learn all about them. Now if you went up to a co-worker and started talking in graphic detail about “glory holes,” you’d get hit with a sexual harassment lawsuit. But this is what Fox is telling its employees to read. And that's not the only pornographic topic Fox is pushing on its workers.

In addition to the porn, Fox is also encouraging everyone at the company to donate to organizations that administer sterilizing hormones to young people —– including homeless youth. This is something that, on-air, Fox News occasionally pretends is a bad thing. But internally, Fox Corp. is promoting it, with enthusiasm. Pull back the curtain, and there's not much daylight between the Fox boardroom and the faculty lounge at U.C. Berkeley.

Actually, in some respects, Fox is even worse than Berkeley. Fox has gone high-tech with its DEI agenda. Just in case any employees at the network stepped out of line, the documents we've obtained also show that Fox leadership experimented with an artificial intelligence program that pushes "diversity, equity and inclusion" in the workplace. The AI, called Eskalera, advertises that it can track the progress of organizations towards certain “DEI” goals. That’s its main function.

Yesterday we uploaded the documents outlining all of this on my Twitter feed. You can check them out there if you haven’t already. Again, the materials come from Fox's employee portal. Here's a screenshot of one of the documents:

Clip 2

You can see that Fox Corp encourages its employees to donate to a variety of organizations, and says it will even help match funds to these groups. Let's go through a couple of them.

According to Fox, employees should donate to the Trevor Project, because it's supposedly devoted to helping "LGBTQ young people ages 13-24." How exactly does the Trevor Project help these youths? As the National Review reported recently, they run a chat room that allows 13-year-olds to connect with LGBTQ adults to talk about sexually explicit topics. As the National Review put it, it's a "pandora's box of depravity." Reportedly, there’s no age requirement or verification whatsoever. In many cases, these adults tell children in the chatroom how to obtain medications, and products like chest binders, without alerting their parents.

One chat from an adult, which children could see, began with the adult talking about his urge to masturbate — it goes on from there in graphic detail. In another chat hosted by the Trevor Project, an adult starts talking about "doggystyle," and a user under the age of 18 responds, saying he also wants to try it. None of this is new information, by the way. It's been reported for months. Fox wants their employees to support the Trevor Project anyway.

They're also telling employees to donate to the Ali Forney Center. That's a group that says it takes care of homeless young people. On their Twitter account, the Ali Forney Center boasts about injecting these young people with cross-sex hormones — hormones that will sterilize them. They say they provide "life-saving services like hormone replacement therapy for our young people."

Clip 3

So they're taking at-risk youth, and they appear to admit that they’re flooding their bodies with irreversible chemicals. This is all right out in the open. And Fox supports it.

As if to erase any doubt about that, Fox also encourages donations to the Los Angeles LGBT Center, which openly brags about giving hormones to children. They even uploaded a video of a mother "surprising her trans daughter with first dose of hormones."

Clip 4

YouTube took down that video for terms of service violations, but a screenshot is still on Twitter. By itself, all of this is alarming. Again, Fox is matching employee donations to these far Left groups. How much of your monthly cable bill is funding this barbarism? And why exactly are Fox executives taking the position that their employees should support the chemical sterilization of minors?

We obtained other documents from the Fox employee portal, and after reviewing those documents, the answer is obvious — to me anyway — Fox is run by a bunch of highly dedicated, godless perverts. There's really no other way for me to describe this: They want to impose their sexual fantasies on other people, whether it's children or their own employees.

We know that because Fox's executives recommend several books for their employees to read.

Clip 5

One of the books is called "Fairest." It's by Meredith Talusan. Here's a quote from the book, early on.

"I'm sorry but what's a glory hole?” I asked. The chuckles in the room aimed themselves at me. Gavin leaned forward so I could see him. In the half-second before he spoke, I noticed that he was beautiful. A glory hole is an opening drilled into the side of a restroom stall, he said like we were reading out of a dictionary…”

What follows is a graphic description of how a glory hole works. I can’t even share with you what most of this book says — at least, I won’t. This is a book that Fox executives tell their employees will "expand [their] perspective." The author goes on to elaborate in ways that I will not share, but again, it’s all on Twitter if you’d like to read it for yourself.

Clip 6

In case you're tempted to think that Fox executives recommended this book by mistake, you should know they also tell their employees to read a novel called "Red, White and Royal Blue." It's about a fictional gay relationship between the prince of Wales and the president's son. It starts off with this dialogue, which can best be described as barely literate.

"Listen," Alex tells her, "royal weddings are trash, the princes who have royal weddings are trash, the imperialism that allows princes to exist at all is trash. It's trash turtles all the way down." "Is this your Ted Talk?” June asks. "You do realize America is a genocidal empire too right? “Yes June, but at least we have the decency to not keep a monarchy around,” Alex says, throwing a pistachio at her."

Why does Fox encourage its employees to read this horribly written dialogue about how America is a genocidal empire? It's hard to say. The book doesn't linger on that topic very long. Very quickly it also devolves into gay erotica.

"Henry gets a grip on Alex's hips and pulls him close, so Alex is properly straddling his lap, and he kisses hard now …” And it gets much worse from there, but again not anything I want to share.

By the way, Fox also recommends a book for its employees read to their children. It’s an illustrated book starring a unicorn, which is clearly intended to be a symbol for being gay or trans or nonbinary, et cetera.

Clip 8

Fox also tells employees to watch videos of activists, including a Ted Talk in which a woman explains that undergoing a medically unnecessary double mastectomy was a sign of strength. Watch:

Clip 9

What we're seeing is a top-down effort by Fox executives to ensure that radical gender ideology, and all of its deranged excesses, is dominant at every level in the company. But of course, not every Fox employee wants to go along with this. That might be why, last year, Fox experimented with a solution to whip those employees in line. It’s an AI platform called Eskalera, which tracks employees’ commitment to the cult of DEI. Here's how VentureBeat describes Eskalera.

Clip 10

"Eskalera creates AI-based Inclusion Index to measure a better workplace. … Eskalera today unveiled the Inclusion Index, a new system for organizing companies that encourages and quantifies inclusive culture. Using organizational analytics, the Inclusion Index is aimed at real-time measurement of a company’s diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts."

If you check the Eskalera website, and do some reading on what "services" this AI performs, it's truly creepy stuff. Eskalera advertises that it pulls in data from a variety of sources, including company email and payroll systems. It generated a “peer comfort index” and a “diversity index,” based in part on how often employees “practice micro-affirmations.” Those are apparently the opposite of “microaggressions,” and it appears Fox is all about them.

Clip 12

Eskalera produces data that guides company leaders, telling them which departments aren't inclusive enough. The system is supposed to guide hiring, terminations, raises — everything.

What's the end result of all this? What happens to a news organization when the executives promote radical gender ideology and perverted reading materials? What happens when they bring in a woke AI to monitor everyone?

You get the current state of Fox. It's a company where it seems that many of the employees hate Fox News viewers. Here’s the Instagram page of one influential Fox News employee, to give just one example. He has pronouns in bio, of course — he goes by he/him.

Clip 13

In one post, this employee calls conservatives "hicks" for complaining about drag queens who target kids.

Clip 14

In another post, he defends the anti-Catholic hate group "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence." “And Catholics wonder why we have an order of Nuns to push back on this ridiculous garbage," he wrote. To be clear, this Fox News employee is defending a group that openly mocks Catholics, putting on perverted and blasphemous displays like this in public:

Clip 15

There are a bunch more posts that make it clear this employee has contempt for Fox News viewers. It's not worth going through all of them, but there's a clear connection between these posts and the content that Fox News viewers see. Some of his posts are about his work on the Fox News website. He says he was "so happy" Fox News got to use the image he made after Joe Biden won the presidency, for example.

This is all very bad, to put it mildly. And now the question is, where do we go from here? What happens next? Well, in the few hours after we first posted our investigation, several prominent conservatives, as expected, stayed silent and refused to amplify it. These are people who are terrified of losing the opportunity to appear on Fox for a couple of minutes. Terrified of not being able to go on Fox and promote their next book, or their podcast, or whatever. They’d rather lose their integrity than lose that.

But several major figures did speak out, to their great credit. Utah Senator Mike Lee, for example, wrote, “This kind of deliberate alienation of its own audience might not end well for Fox News. But for the fact that there is no other large cable news company in America that is widely known as conservative (or even right of center), this account could prove devastating.”

Scott Adams wrote simply, “My brain is exploding.”

James Lindsey observed that “ESG/CEI likely is behind both this and Tucker's removal at FOX. Fox is now openly known to be part of the ESG cartel.”

Blaze host Steve Deace said “Just read this thread. Complete and total vile filth from Fox News.”

Jeremy's Razors Sale. 30% off

Other commentators — including people who stand to get disinvited from Fox, permanently, for speaking out — spoke out as well. Jason Whitlock, a frequent guest on Fox, publicly thanked us for the investigation.

Benny Johnson wrote, “This is insane. You need to read this. Fox News is a 5th column. A Trojan horse in the city walls.”

Robby Starbuck, another regular on Fox, tweeted, “I will not appear on a Fox News show until they drop their attacks on Tucker and fire the person responsible for this vile memo.” And Chaya Raichik, the founder of Libs of TikTok, wrote, “I visited Fox HQ a few times. On one occasion I noticed a bunch of screensavers with the words "Fox Pride" in rainbow colors. I remember thinking it was very strange. It all makes sense now. Fox needs to get their act together.”

All of these people and more, at some significant personal cost, responded to our investigation. They were willing to call out a wrong when they saw it, regardless of whether it impacted them professionally. Credit to them for that, and now we need many more to speak out. Every conservative is quick to criticize corporate wokeism — and for good reason — but Fox must not be given a pass. Quite the opposite.

So the question is: what do Fox News executives think about all of this? Do they object to their parent company recommending books about pornographic topics to their employees? Fox News’ audience deserves to know.

After I posted yesterday’s tweet thread on our investigation last night, we reached out to Fox News executives about this. We still haven’t heard back. So far, Fox doesn’t seem to think its viewers deserve any kind of explanation whatsoever. That may be more revealing than what we uncovered, frankly.

Why explain this? As we said on Twitter, maybe it’s because Fox doesn’t really care what its viewers think. Fox, like many big tech platforms and major corporations, is primarily owned by enormous institutional investors, particularly Blackrock and Vanguard. These massive funds consolidate the wealth of millions of Americans, and then use their combined power to pursue a radical agenda most of those Americans oppose. They are Fox’s real customers. And they’re getting exactly what they want.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Patriot Post: Fukk FOX
« Reply #3875 on: June 19, 2023, 10:13:19 AM »
In Memoriam: Fox News
The onetime answer to the Left's corporate media monopoly has gone all in for diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Douglas Andrews


Here's a story you won't find on Fox News: Fox News sucks.

Daily Wire columnist Matt Walsh — he of the fiendishly funny "What Is a Woman?" mockumentary — recently obtained internal communications from Fox News employees revealing that the onetime fly in the Left's mainstream media ointment now encourages its employees to support all manner of LGBTQ organizations, including the employment of an artificial intelligence monitoring system to track its employees' commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

In a withering and at times grotesque 25-part Twitter broadside, Walsh takes the network to task.

"A screenshot of a Fox employee portal shared by Walsh showed that the company encourages employees to donate to the Trevor Project, the Ali Forney Center, and the L.A. LGBT Center," Walsh writes, referring to three particularly radical organizations that the company supports. "Fox also encourages employees to read explicit LGBTQ books like one that gives a sexually explicit description of a 'glory hole' and another that describes pornographic scenes between two gay characters."

Some of the material in Walsh's thread is utterly obscene, beyond indecent. But if you're curious, well, knock yourself out.

We wonder: What would Roger Ailes think about this transformation? What would he think about the network he created to break up the Left's monopoly on the news?

More important: What must Fox News employees think? Walsh notes that Fox's woke leadership — the same leadership that sent the wildly popular Tucker Carlson packing — has introduced an AI program that monitors its staff via a social credit scoring system that would make the communist Chinese blush. As The Daily Wire reports: "Fox executives told employees to sign up for Eskalera, an AI program that helps people 'engage in activities that will deepen' their 'understanding of identity' and 'explore more nuanced D&I concepts.'"

And get this: "Eskalera says it pulls in data from various sources, including the email and payroll systems. It generates a 'peer comfort index' and a 'diversity index,' based in part on how often employees 'practice micro-affirmations.'"

It's downright creepy, no?

As Walsh notes in the 13th installment of his Twitter-based broadside: "Fox further recommends that employees listen to podcasts like 'Queery' and watch various TED Talks about 'LGBT life.' In one of those talks, a woman explains that undergoing a medically unnecessary double mastectomy is a sign of strength."

In the final three installments of Walsh's exposé, he points to the real powerbrokers at the network — its ESG-driven institutional investors:

Do the executives and owners just not know what's happening in their company? Are they trying to comply with some onerous New York State Law? Do they not care? Do they actually support this nonsense? Fox News' audience deserves to know.

Or maybe Fox leadership isn't concerned with how the audience feels because they're not really beholden to those viewers at all. Like YouTube, some of Fox's largest shareholders are enormous institutional investors, particularly BlackRock and Vanguard Group.

These massive funds consolidate the wealth of millions of Americans, and then use their combined voting power to pursue a radical agenda most of those Americans oppose. They are Fox's real customers. And they're getting exactly what they want.

Many years ago, having observed the success of Fox News amid the struggles of all the other broadcast news outlets, we figured one of those networks — ABC, NBC, or CBS — would break ranks with its liberal brethren and join Fox News on the center-right. Our thinking was that rather than continuing to do battle for viewership and advertising dollars in a bloody red ocean, one of them would venture off into the clear blue waters where Fox News had virtually no competition for half the country's viewers and the advertising revenue it thereby commanded.

Needless to say, we were wrong.

As one Twitter commenter put it, "Time to budlight Fox News."





DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
MSNBC, Humor in the headline?
« Reply #3880 on: June 27, 2023, 06:21:15 AM »
MSNBC Headline:

"We'll Probably Never Know If Bias Seeped Into Biden DOJ"
--------------------

No.  I suppose you won't.

Maybe an impeachment trial or two will help.

You say possible bias.  I say treason.

Strange that neither Microsoft nor the once great NBC can get their brand name back from this failed rogue enterprise, activists posing as journalists.

Covering the biggest stories of the day - with a pillow until they stop breathing. (Iowahawk)


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
FOX fires Tucker's team
« Reply #3881 on: June 27, 2023, 08:02:31 AM »


FOX CANS ITS RATINGS MACHINE… ‘Shockingly Callous’: Fox News Fires Remaining Tucker Staffers In Show’s Final Stroke

Fox News has fired the remaining staffers from Tucker Carlson’s show as the network announces a new primetime lineup, Daily Caller confirmed Monday.

The network let go of at least nine remaining staffers, including long-standing producers, in a move described as “shockingly callous” by one former Fox News producer who spoke to the Daily Caller.

“Some of the producers fired have been at Fox for well over a decade,” the producer told the Daily Caller.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
funny how the media reports Biden corruption
« Reply #3882 on: June 27, 2023, 09:14:41 AM »
rather then pointing out the evidence of corruption

(they were falling all over themselves to report corruption when it was nixon or accusations against Trump)

they always preface "republicans " are the ones saying it

in other words to reduce credibility or substance to the charges
from overwhelming evidence

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/mccarthy-considers-impeachment-inquiry-ag-231300665.html



G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
"Teens" "People" and the media
« Reply #3883 on: June 28, 2023, 07:57:48 AM »
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/6/27/23775864/lakeview-street-takeover-belmont-pride-parade-cta

What picture do they lead with? There are LOTS of pictures of the actual riot. Why not show the actual rioters?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Why isn't Foxweiser covering this?
« Reply #3884 on: June 30, 2023, 10:22:48 AM »
Armchair Warlord
@ArmchairW
Imagine the reaction if this was a map of Moscow.

Meanwhile, looking at the FoxNews front page - even clicking through to the global section - I can't find a single story on the deadly, nationwide riots gripping France.

They're still talking about Wagner!



https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=852,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/141/707/105/original/61738b8ea0e5b6c9.png

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
libs fight for the headlines
« Reply #3885 on: June 30, 2023, 03:09:48 PM »
https://news.yahoo.com/prosecutors-prepared-hit-trump-allies-194642421.html

shysters
at war with us.

MSPCP will have 24/7 about this along with the "fascist" "power hungry" SCOTUS
(in their words)

 :wink:

seems like more !! then this but  -  :-o

1.3 million lawyers
Did you know there are 1.3 million lawyers in the United States – and 1 in 4 are in just two states (New York and California)?


lawyer influence in the US

https://academic.oup.com/jla/article/8/2/277/2502548

8 % work for the government

the DNC bias of lawyers  according to this :

68 % donate to Dems

among elite law school grads

it is worse 76%

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/08/analyst-gauges-the-political-bias-of-lawyers/

DC has highest concentration in nation:

https://www.lawyersofdistinction.com/lawyers-by-capita-per-state/

how do we  fight this MOB ?
« Last Edit: June 30, 2023, 03:48:23 PM by ccp »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Imperioli clarifies
« Reply #3887 on: July 05, 2023, 03:17:55 PM »
I could care less
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/michael-imperioli-clarifies-remarks-forbidding-160127814.html

but I love this part :

 “After turning down invitations to appear on various news programs, "

no doubt the beady eyed horn rimmed Vanderbilt or his network
MSPCP, PBS and the other suspects read his rant on the internet and immediately at the crack of dawn the  next AM called him to come on their propaganda DNC outlets to get him to bash
Republicans , the SCOTUS and of course interject Trump's name

 :roll: :wink:


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Fox is NOT the "enemy of the people"
« Reply #3888 on: July 08, 2023, 06:22:12 AM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/07/07/fox-news-retracts-fake-news-hit-piece-on-donald-trump/

 :roll:

oh these MAGAS who are so in love with the idol and one and only chosen king drives just as nuts as the LEFT - almost anyway

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
NRO: Pravdas puppets of Intel Community
« Reply #3889 on: July 09, 2023, 12:12:00 PM »
The Media’s Scandalous Infatuation with the Intelligence Community

From left: Former FBI director Andrew McCabe on CNN's "The Situation Room," August 12, 2021; former CIA director John Brennan on MSNBC's "Inside with Jen Psaki," June 11, 2023; and former DNI James Clapper on CNN, June 26, 2023.(CNN, MSNBC/via YouTube)


By BECKET ADAMS
July 9, 2023 6:30 AM

The intel-to-newsroom pipeline is both nauseating and dangerous.

The current relationship between the intelligence community and major media is not just uncomfortably chummy, it’s dangerous.

We’re in a bad place when the “watchmen” of our republic are apparently at the beck and call of professional liars, dismissing the worst abuses by intelligence officials and platforming them with plum newsroom “analyst” gigs.

Under John Brennan’s leadership, the CIA spied on the United States Senate.

Brennan’s flunkies created a fake online profile to access the network used by the Senate Intelligence Committee, whose Democratic members were at the time investigating the CIA’s torture program. Once inside, CIA agents read emails written by Senate investigators. The spies then made criminal referrals based on bogus information. During this entire ordeal, Brennan lied repeatedly, both publicly and behind closed doors, about the spying.

Brennan currently serves as a national-security and intelligence analyst for NBC News and MSNBC.

Elsewhere, a 2018 report by the Justice Department inspector general found that disgraced former FBI official Andrew McCabe had leaked sensitive information about the Hillary Clinton email investigation to members of the press. According to that report, McCabe lied to his boss, then–FBI director James Comey; lied to members of the FBI’s Inspection Division, sometimes while under oath; and lied to agents for the Office of the Inspector General.

McCabe currently serves as a senior law-enforcement analyst for CNN.

As the director of national intelligence, James Clapper testified under oath before a congressional committee that the National Security Agency had not, in fact, collected data on millions of Americans. It had. He lied.

Clapper currently serves as a national-security analyst for CNN.

Despite their egregious lies, these men have gone on to have successful careers in news media, serving as supposedly trustworthy and reliable “experts.” Never mind that they had no qualms about lying for personal, professional, and/or ideological reasons. Never mind their exceptional abuses of power.

Despite having every reason to distrust these agencies and the men who head them, the press has adopted an almost reflexively pro-intelligence-community position in both its news coverage and commentary. Indeed, it’s not just hiring these washed-up spooks; it’s also promoting the intel communities’ preferred narratives. This latter trend especially reached absurd heights this past week when the New York Times went to bat for a CIA warrantless spying program opposed by Republicans and Democrats.

“G.O.P. Threatens Spy Agencies’ Surveillance Tool,” reads the headline. The subhead adds, “With hard-right Republicans attacking federal law enforcement agencies and unwilling to extend their broad powers, a major warrantless surveillance program targeting foreigners overseas may face new limits from Congress.”

Remember, in the Times’ framing, it is the Republicans who are the bad guys, not the agency with a “warrantless surveillance program.” The story’s framing is even more comical when one reads the opening paragraphs:

An intensive drive by right-wing Republicans in Congress to vilify the F.B.I. with charges of political bias has imperiled a program allowing spy agencies to conduct warrantless surveillance on foreign targets, sapping support for a premier intelligence tool and amplifying demands for stricter limits.

The once-secret program — created after the 9/11 attacks and described by intelligence officials as crucial to stopping overseas hackers, spy services and terrorists — has long faced resistance by Democrats concerned that it could trample on Americans’ civil liberties. But the law authorizing it is set to expire in December, and opposition among Republicans, who have historically championed it, has grown as the G.O.P. has stepped up its attacks on the F.B.I., taking a page from former President Donald J. Trump and his supporters.

You’ll note that Democratic opposition to the surveillance program does not inspire similarly negative coverage by the Times. The paper’s ire is reserved exclusively for Republicans. Also, let’s not forget that the Times won a Pulitzer in 2006 for its efforts to uncover the scope of the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, which surveilled a rotating list of both domestic targets as well as “about 5,000 to 7,000” individuals overseas “suspected of terrorist ties.” The Pulitzer committee even gushed at the time that the paper’s “carefully sourced stories on secret domestic eavesdropping” had “stirred a national debate on the boundary line between fighting terrorism and protecting civil liberty.”

The Times article also includes the following lines (emphasis added):

But far-right lawmakers have embarked on a louder and more politically loaded effort to fight the measure. They have seized on official determinations that federal agents botched a wiretap on a Trump campaign adviser and more recent disclosures that F.B.I. analysts improperly used Section 702 to search for information about hundreds of Americans who came under scrutiny in connection with the Jan. 6 attack and the Black Lives Matter protests after the 2020 murder of George Floyd by a police officer.

This is such a generous and charitable retelling of the wiretap scandal as to be near-identical to state propaganda. For the record, the FBI, which had good reason to believe that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign fabricated the Russian collusion story from thin air, submitted inaccurate, incomplete, unsupported, and even intentionally falsified information to justify its surveillance of the 2016 Trump campaign.

What are we even doing here, folks?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3890 on: July 09, 2023, 02:55:33 PM »
"You’ll note that Democratic opposition to the surveillance program does not inspire similarly negative coverage by the Times. The paper’s ire is reserved exclusively for Republicans. "

couple with the fact these spies are getting good gigs in left wing media

and we see opportune one sided leaks to the Left wing media ...........

and one connects the dots

who says leakers are not being bribed ?

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
remember Eleanor Clift
« Reply #3891 on: July 17, 2023, 07:38:03 AM »
definitely one of the most stupid reliably Democrat pundit on TV

to summarize her 100% of the time :

Democrats - always good
Republicans - always bad

https://news.yahoo.com/casey-desantis-smiling-face-anti-083909128.html

I didn't read this "column".
Why bother ?
I know what it will say.





DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Increased UFO coverage
« Reply #3895 on: July 30, 2023, 06:56:58 PM »
The more evidence we uncover on Biden corruption, the more UFO news we get.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/ufo-hearing-online-reactions-twitter-tiktok-rcna96664



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3898 on: August 08, 2023, 09:08:18 AM »
".US Judge Orders Former Fox News Reporter to Reveal Sources for Story Involving FBI"

from above post.

As far as I can recall I have NEVER heard of a LEFTIST DNC "source ever having to be revealed - EVER!

 :x :x :x




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72256
    • View Profile
Re: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« Reply #3899 on: August 08, 2023, 12:28:45 PM »
BTW, I was a big fan of Herridge when she was at FOX.  Presumably I still am, but have not followed here over to the Pravada.