Author Topic: Immigration issues  (Read 615015 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1800 on: February 20, 2022, 02:21:58 PM »
I would describe that as Puppet Joe obeying his Big Tech masters.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1801 on: February 20, 2022, 02:33:50 PM »
I would describe that as Puppet Joe obeying his Big Tech masters.

Yes. This.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
WT: Public Charge standards
« Reply #1802 on: February 22, 2022, 03:39:37 AM »
Homeland Security seeks narrow ‘public charge’ definition

Court to weigh Trump defense

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Biden administration has moved to make it more attractive for immigrants to sign up for welfare, laying down a marker just days before the Supreme Court is slated to take up the issue in a legal challenge seeking to restore stricter Trump-era rules.

The Homeland Security Department released a proposal to raise the bar for becoming a “public charge.” Joining programs such as Medicaid won’t be counted against most immigrants, it said.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said immigrants “will not be penalized for choosing to access the health benefits and other supplemental government services available to them.”

The proposal, announced late last week, tries to unwind a Trump-era policy that pressured immigrants to pay their own way.

That policy is set to go before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

“While America is indeed the land of opportunity, it’s not the land of the welfare state,” Arizona

Attorney General Mark Brnovich told The Washington Times.

Mr. Brnovich is leading the defense of the Trump-era rules because the Biden administration has refused to do so. Mr. Mayorkas said the rules were “not consistent with our nation’s values.”

The issue before the justices is whether Arizona is allowed to step in. The Trump administration had been handling the defense but lost in lower courts.

Federal law has allowed the government to block immigrants likely to become public charges as far back as 1882. Immigration records from the early 1900s show that about half of would-be immigrants stopped at entry in any given year were rejected on the grounds of public charge.

Congress has updated the law several times, most recently in 1996 to encourage immigrants to prove they are self-sufficient.

What constitutes a “public charge” is not defined in the law, and Republican and Democratic administrations have sparred over ways to interpret it.

The Clinton administration drafted tentative guidance in 1999 that was relatively permissive toward immigrants’ use of welfare. The guidance penalized immigrants chiefly for using cash programs such as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or Supplemental Security Income.

Two decades later, the Trump administration said the law demanded a stricter approach and released a formal regulation in August 2019 that covered noncash welfare such as food stamps, Medicaid benefits and housing assistance. Immigrants found to be using those programs could be penalized in applications to become lawful permanent residents — the key stop on the path to citizenship.

Numerous lawsuits were filed, and judges sided with the challengers. The Trump administration was appealing those rulings.

When the Biden administration took office, it sided with the challengers and declined to defend the 2019 rules.

The Biden administration then used the judicial rulings as a basis to terminate the Trump policy, in the words of one appeals court judge, “ensuring not only that the rule was gone faster than toilet paper in a pandemic, but that it could effectively never, ever be resurrected, even by a future administration.”

Enter Mr. Brnovich, who asked the courts to be allowed to mount a defense of the Trump rules.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused the request. Now the Supreme Court will decide what to do.

In Wednesday’s oral arguments, Arizona will face off against San Francisco and Santa Clara, two California jurisdictions that sued to stop the 2019 rules and won in lower courts. Even though it’s no longer defending the Trump-era regulation, the Biden administration also will be present.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar will urge the justices to block Arizona from arguing when the administration won’t.

If the Biden administration’s “sneaky” strategy goes unchecked, Mr. Brnovich said, administrations will be able to circumvent the usual regulatory process and work with like-minded interest groups to end federal regulations they don’t like.

“It’s sue-and-settle on steroids,” he told The Times.

The public charge policy is just one of several cases in which the Biden administration agrees with court challenges of Trumpera rules.

The fact that the high court took the case suggests that at least four justices have concerns.

Arizona asked the court to take up its intervention request and the broader argument over the Trumpera rules, but the justices limited the case to the intervention issue.

In a filing last week, though, the Justice Department informed the justices about the Homeland Security proposal to reaffirm the Clinton-era standards.

The key part of the proposal is to define “likely to become a public charge” — language from the law — as “likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.”

Homeland Security said the 2019 rules had scared more than 2 million immigrants and family members, even those not subject to public charge rules, into avoiding benefits such as Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor.

About 1.3 million didn’t sign up for food stamps, Homeland Security says.

The government said the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the risks inherent in having fewer people with health care coverage.

The Trump-era rule was supposed to save the government about $3.8 billion a year because fewer people were signing up for benefits.

Fears that immigrants would be blocked from adjusting their status never materialized. The rule was in effect from February 2020 to March 2021. Out of more than 47,000 applications filed, just five were affected by the stiffer 2019 rules.


Immigrants will be able to line up for more government services without penalty under a proposed Homeland Security Department policy. ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOTOGRAPHS


Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich wants to defend Trump-era welfare limits for immigrants. The Biden administration has refused to do so. The Supreme Court will hear their arguments Wednesday


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
Dems let whites family in
« Reply #1806 on: March 11, 2022, 05:42:00 AM »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1810 on: April 05, 2022, 02:45:02 AM »
Dunno.  There is a certain logic there.  Americans are not stepping forward in sufficient numbers, and as the article states, it could be a solid landing for someone to build a life in America for his family and him.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1811 on: April 05, 2022, 02:50:08 AM »
Dunno.  There is a certain logic there.  Americans are not stepping forward in sufficient numbers, and as the article states, it could be a solid landing for someone to build a life in America for his family and him.

Ah, the famed Afghan work ethic has it's chance to shine!

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1812 on: April 05, 2022, 02:57:57 AM »
Wit acknowledged  :-D 

What about the Ukes?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1813 on: April 05, 2022, 03:01:56 AM »
Wit acknowledged  :-D 

What about the Ukes?

Good news for the strip clubs and parts of America that haven't yet had the pleasure of having eastern european organized crime mafiyas operating in their cities. Improved sales for retailers that sell gold chains, leather jackets, mirrored sunglasses and tracksuits!

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
even if repubs take house and senate
« Reply #1814 on: April 05, 2022, 06:42:46 AM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1817 on: April 07, 2022, 07:26:29 AM »
"Can't happen here!"

right, and we know it is already happening here

and Democrats are hell bent and accelerating it

then with the likes with the big liar Baraq label anyone who complains as racist crazies etc.

he really is the great snake.




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
52% say Biden should get tough on immigration
« Reply #1818 on: April 11, 2022, 06:31:03 AM »
means the Dems have almost achieved there goal of diluting American with so many immigrants

many illegal that soon they will be majority along with the communist Americans

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/04/10/poll-over-half-of-americans-say-biden-must-get-tough-on-illegal-immigration/

of course this is a CBS poll so it would be biased in favor of mass immigration

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
Good hard data (NJ)
« Reply #1819 on: April 16, 2022, 08:40:59 AM »
https://populistpress.com/biden-secret-flights-busted/

I have no idea how accurate this is but here are estimates
of NJ illegals

probably does not include their children born here who are suddenly US citizens

so real number would be even higher in that regard if they were included:

https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant-population/state/NJ

pop of NJ est. 8.8 million. - but who knows ?

I wonder how many vote ?

here is another estimate :

5% of total pop in NJ ( I would guess higher ):

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immigrants-in-new-jersey
« Last Edit: April 16, 2022, 11:18:31 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1820 on: April 16, 2022, 11:18:08 AM »
Some fascinating data in there!


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
WT: Afghan Evacuees
« Reply #1821 on: April 18, 2022, 05:47:22 AM »
IMMIGRATION

Afghanistan evacuees find clashes with U.S. laws

Records show sex, violence offenses

BY STEPHEN DINAN THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The 77,000 Afghans evacuated to the U.S. have all been processed and released from military bases, but not before racking up a striking number of criminal entanglements including violence against women and sexual assaults on children.

Federal prosecutors in Virginia charged a man with molesting a 14-yearold girl. As investigators dug into his phone, they said, they found child pornography among thousands of photos he kept. They have now charged him with that offense, too.

Another evacuee stands accused of bashing his wife with a cellphone charger and slashing her wrists with a razor blade. Investigators say he was mad at his wife for taking one of the seats at an evacuee meeting, while his brother had to stand.

Still another evacuee is awaiting sentencing after a jury found him guilty of groping a child. He defended his actions to investigators, saying it was part of his culture to hug and kiss children.

In New Jersey, Khan Wali Rahmani was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon. According to court documents, he became upset when he thought another evacuee was “staring” at him during religious rites. He told investigators he grabbed a metal pipe and smashed the man in the back of the head.

Mr. Rahmani claimed self-defense, though the federal investigator who wrote the criminal complaint dryly noted that he attacked “while Victim #1 kneeled in prayer.”

The bad behavior extends beyond the camps, too.

In Missoula, Montana, prosecutors have charged an evacuee with raping an 18-year-old girl in his hotel room.

In Wisconsin, an evacuee who arrived with his wife and six children and held himself out as a liaison to the community where they settled now stands charged with sexual assault. A woman who had been working with the family said the evacuee told her he had never talked to a woman like her before, said they should act like brother and sister and then tried to get her to fondle him.

Rep. Thomas P. Tiffany, a Wisconsin Republican who has been keeping an eye on evacuees who were sent to Fort McCoy in his state, said, “The cultural differences are stark.”

“It’s part of the reason you have to go slow with any type of immigration situation. We should expect assimilation into our country, and when you just wave in almost 80,000 people of a very different culture than America, you’re inviting real upheaval in local communities,” the congressman told The Washington Times.

Evacuees were supposed to be allies — those who assisted the American war effort and who usually had some English ability and acculturation with Americans. In reality, a majority lack those ties. Who got out was determined more by who was able to make it to the airport.

Once in the U.S., the Afghans were spread out among eight camps run by military bases.

Experts said many of the people who arrived lack the acculturation that authentic allies, who worked with U.S. troops for years, would have had, and that is contributing to difficulties in resettling.

American communities have opened their doors and their wallets to help resettle evacuees. The military has won rave reviews for its ability to stand up the evacuee camps at eight bases across the country.

The vast majority appear to be settling in without criminal entanglements, and some have even started to look for ways to return the generosity of their hosts. In one stirring story, an evacuee in Indiana made headlines after he signed up for the Indiana National Guard, saying he was “grateful” for the opportunities the U.S. had given him.

But there have also been some significant hiccups with the evacuee population, many of which have gone unreported.

New Mexico State Police told The Times that they responded to 85 service calls from the Afghan camp at Holloman Air Force Base. Among them were more than a dozen battery accusations, six domestic violence calls, two prostitution alerts, three disorderly callouts, two child abuse accusations, one indecent exposure and 13 suspicious circumstances reports.

When the Defense Department’s inspector general conducted a review of the base’s handling of Afghan evacuees, the entire section on security was redacted.

Reports on some of the other seven bases that house evacuees exposed serious hiccups and challenges.

At Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, investigators said military and federal law enforcement officers found Afghan leaders in the evacuee camp were hushing up crime reports, particularly domestic violence incidents.

At Fort Pickett in Virginia, base security said they received reports of abuse of women and children, as well as some thefts, but the military police felt they had “limited law enforcement authority” over the evacuees. State and local police, meanwhile, were stretched too thin to be of much assistance.

Even when law enforcement recommended felony charges —in one incident of a stolen vehicle and another case of physical abuse — local magistrates lowered the charges to misdemeanors and the evacuees were “quickly” sent back to the camp, the inspector general said.

The crime reports also never got attached to the culprits’ files. Security personnel told the inspector general that meant families that might choose to sponsor Afghans — helping them find jobs, locate housing or connect to services — would never know of their troubles while at Fort Pickett.

At Fort McCoy in Wisconsin, the inspector general said security personnel found they had “limited options” when dealing with misdemeanors such as thefts or simple assaults. They tried to get the U.S. attorney’s office to prosecute, but in most cases, the federal prosecutor declines.

Base officials’ normal recourse for anyone else in that situation would be to restrict access to the installation, but offi cials decided that would contradict the welcoming posture the U.S. was trying to maintain to the evacuees.

Instead, they issued warning letters. Over the first two months, the base had to issue 12 warning letters.

The U.S. attorney’s office for western Wisconsin declined to discuss its specific reasons. “We base all of our charging decisions on facts and law and the principles of federal prosecution,” spokesperson Myra Longfield said.

Mr. Tiffany, the congressman from Wisconsin, said prosecutors faced tricky decisions about how to handle the evacuee population.

He said the blame lies on the Biden administration for the way the evacuees were brought in the first place, under the homeland security secretary’s power of parole, rather than a formal immigrant visa or refugee status.

“It goes back to the ham-handed way in which our federal government — in particular the Department of Homeland Security — has dealt with this issue, and it was we’re just going to put these people on the planes and get them out of Kabul and to America rather than sorting out their immigration status first,” he said.

Among the cases that have emerged from the camps is that of Alif Jan Adil, accused of molesting a teenage girl under a blanket. According to investigators, he said they were in love, but when confronted by an Afghan translator who said it was against his culture, he became remorseful and admitted guilt.

When investigators went through Mr. Adil’s phone, they said, they also found child pornography. He now stands charged with that crime in addition to aggravated sexual battery involving the girl.

The girl told authorities her mother threatened to kill her “because she had brought negative attention to their family for making these allegations.”

In another case from Wisconsin, investigators said an evacuee struck his children, choked his wife and threatened to kill her.

“He beat me many times in Afghanistan to the point I lost vision in both eyes,” the woman told authorities. She said her husband also threatened to send her back to Afghanistan for the Taliban to “deal with.”

Mohammad Imaad was convicted of disorderly conduct and was sentenced to time served.

Every criminal prosecution The Times has reviewed involved a male defendant. In nearly every case, the victim was a woman.

One exception was in New Jersey, where Mr. Rahmani is accused of beating a man he thought was staring at him during prayers.

Another exception was in Wisconsin, where a man was charged with attempted sexual assault of two young teen boys.

There could be other cases under investigation. Federal prosecutors said they can’t talk about referrals that haven’t been charged.

One high-profile case out of Fort Bliss involved a female soldier who said she was assaulted by a “small group” of male evacuees. No charges have been filed in that case.

As the first charges emerged in September, Air Force Gen. Glen VanHerck, head of U.S. Northern Command, said the numbers were still comparatively low.

“I’ve done some research,” the general said. “What we’re seeing is law enforcement violations that are on par, and in most cases significantly lower than, similarly sized populations across the U.S.”

He also pointed out that cases were reported to authorities by fellow evacuees.

At the time the general made his remarks, he said, eight cases were under investigation.

Neither the Homeland Security Department nor U.S. Northern Command would divulge final criminal investigation numbers, but Northern Command said it sticks by the general’s evaluation.

“From DoD’s perspective, due to efforts at each task force to provide cultural training and education, incidents of crime dramatically reduced over time to average well below most similarly sized populations across the country,” Northern Command told The Times in a statement.

Homeland Security, in its response to questions about criminal behavior by evacuees, detailed the database screening Afghans went through before being brought to the U.S. and warnings delivered to Afghans about breaking the law once they were in the country.

“If individuals engage in criminal activity or additional information becomes available that raises a concern, the U.S. government takes action, which can include prosecution, revocation of parole, and placement into removal proceedings,” the department said.

The Times reached out to several Afghan American organizations for this article but received no response.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
dems hints of offering "deal" on immigration
« Reply #1822 on: April 22, 2022, 07:55:46 PM »
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2022/04/22/democrats-hint-will-keep-border-barrier-if-gop-oks-more-legal-migration/

of course Romney will

jump to make this deal

I say no deal

it is a scam

anyway

we already have ~. 70 - 80 million people in this country born elsewhere


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
mayorkas
« Reply #1825 on: April 29, 2022, 07:41:52 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Mayorkas

Is a Cuban Jew  ?

actively working against our laws in place
against the people of the United States

and we have to just sit and take it

We just cannot let these Biden people get away with this.....

just wait
vote much. harder !

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1826 on: April 30, 2022, 10:44:11 AM »
Mayorkas =

Kaganovich

one of the very very few who survived Stalin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich

what a disgrace
I am no longer proud


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1827 on: April 30, 2022, 12:09:58 PM »
Mayorkas =

Kaganovich

one of the very very few who survived Stalin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich

what a disgrace
I am no longer proud

Weird how two percent of the US population manages to get to positions of power and then appears to gleefully use those positions to sabotage the country from within.

It’s kind of like how 13 percent of the US population commits around 50 percent of the murders. It’s a thoughtcrime to even think it, much less say it.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: mayorkas
« Reply #1828 on: April 30, 2022, 12:16:49 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Mayorkas

Is a Cuban Jew  ?

actively working against our laws in place
against the people of the United States

and we have to just sit and take it

We just cannot let these Biden people get away with this.....

just wait
vote much. harder !

6 republicants voted to confirm him.

MUST!
VOTE!
HARDER!
 

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: mayorkas
« Reply #1829 on: April 30, 2022, 12:21:59 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Mayorkas

Is a Cuban Jew  ?

actively working against our laws in place
against the people of the United States

and we have to just sit and take it

We just cannot let these Biden people get away with this.....

just wait
vote much. harder !

6 republicants voted to confirm him.

MUST!
VOTE!
HARDER!

https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/04/29/mayorkas-looks-to-divert-va-funding-to-illegal-immigrants-n465790

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
mayorkas
« Reply #1830 on: April 30, 2022, 12:23:28 PM »
" Weird how two percent of the US population manages to get to positions of power and then appears to gleefully use those positions to sabotage the country from within."

But almost never before they get ***their cut*** which is alway safe :

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2021/06/22/heres-how-much-secretary-of-homeland-security-alejandro-mayorkas-is-worth/?sh=6f8c0483710f

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
I don't believe this poll
« Reply #1833 on: May 10, 2022, 10:31:35 AM »
as per associated press:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/09/poll-nearly-half-republicans-say-democrats-using-mass-migration-import-voters/


I believe the crats are lying when they say no
but I do not believe 53% of Republicans can be this stupid


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The great replacement
« Reply #1834 on: May 17, 2022, 02:12:17 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1835 on: May 17, 2022, 05:26:13 PM »
Nice find!

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
CNN suspend immigration enforcement in Uvalde
« Reply #1841 on: May 26, 2022, 01:12:34 PM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/25/cnns-juliette-kayyem-demands-federal-government-suspend-immigration-enforcement-in-uvalde/

I was wondering how many of these people are illegal/legal

but beyond that my question

is

what enforcement?

there is none.



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18501
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration issues
« Reply #1844 on: May 31, 2022, 05:39:19 AM »
was Ramos here illegal?

I also wonder why one Dem congresswoman stated we should have a moratorium of immigration enforcement in Ulvade .

 :wink:

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Magic Soil! Magic Soil!
« Reply #1845 on: May 31, 2022, 01:03:43 PM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Good thing we have secure borders!
« Reply #1846 on: June 01, 2022, 06:39:38 PM »



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69384
    • View Profile