Author Topic: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation  (Read 733371 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2300 on: December 13, 2024, 02:44:52 PM »
Good questions and no reason that a statute could not be written to answer them.

First order of business though is to assert politically with great clarity that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" has yet to be defined-- i.e.  THAT THE QUESTION IS NOT FORECLOSED AS IS CURRENTLY ASSERTED.

I thought the Malone article did a good job of clarifying where the open question begging definition is to be found.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
FO: Remigration
« Reply #2301 on: December 17, 2024, 07:54:52 AM »


(2) TRUMP TEAM OPENS BACK CHANNELS FOR REMIGRATION EFFORT: According to people familiar with the matter, the Trump transition team reached out to the governments of Mexico and El Salvador to discuss the countries taking in illegal immigrants when President-elect Trump takes office.
The back channel discussions are intended to set broad understandings so detailed work on deportations can begin immediately, according to the people.
Why It Matters: This is another indicator that Trump officials are focused on day-one remigration plans. Trump has signaled he will use “economic statecraft” to pressure foreign countries to accept deported illegal immigrants. However, this economic pressure is unlikely to work on some countries like Venezuela or China, which are already experiencing economic pressure from tariffs and sanctions. – R.C.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2302 on: December 22, 2024, 09:04:48 AM »


December 20, 2024
View On Website

Northbound Migration Through the Darien Gap
Measures have been taken to keep people closer to their countries of origin.
By: Geopolitical Futures

Panama's Darien Gap Migration Decreases

(click to enlarge)

Panama and Costa Rica lay along one of the most important transit routes for American migrants, the majority of whom are fleeing the poor living conditions and violence in Venezuela. Those coming from outside the Western Hemisphere – mostly from China and African countries – come to South America before venturing north. Notably, certain measures have been taken to make it more difficult for them to enter South America; Ecuador, for example, has reinstated visa requirements for Chinese travelers.

The United States has strong ties with both Costa Rica and Panama, and it has every intention to leverage those ties to stem the flow of migrants before they can reach the U.S. border. To that end, Washington in 2023 introduced safe migration offices in Costa Rica, Panama, Guatemala, Colombia and Ecuador that can process claims from migrants seeking asylum status in the U.S. The idea is for migrants wait for their case to be resolved legally closer to their country of origin. In addition, the US has arranged a program to support Panama’s attempts to deport irregular migrants by providing air transit back to Colombia and select countries of origin.

For their part, Costa Rica and Panama have instituted a joint busing system to shuttle migrants into Nicaragua who enter via the Darien gap. This, too, is meant to ensure safety, reduce passage time and limit the amount of time migrants spend in country.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Elon, Vivek, and H-1 Visas
« Reply #2303 on: December 27, 2024, 08:23:35 AM »


1) https://morgthorak.substack.com/p/screw-elon-musk-and-x?publication_id=1155331&r=rne00


==================

2)
H1-Better Be Indian


Geoffrey Ingersoll, Editor at Large

December 27


Good morning, Dear Reader,

 

Here we are, last weekend in 2024.

 

What will ‘25 bring? Trump really only has 18 months before midterms gridlock DC. If he’s smart, he’ll thread the needle on immigration, and not just of the illegal variety.

 

With that …

 

H1-Better Be Indian

 

Vivek Ramaswamy really stepped in it.

 

In a 400+ word tweet, he criticized America’s everyone-gets-a-trophy culture that idolizes the likes of the Kardashians and “jocks” like “Slater” from 90s show “Saved by the Bell,” while ridiculing nerds like “Screech” from the same show.

 

His conclusion was baffling: America needs more entry-level foreign tech nerds because she’s too busy chucking footballs and Instagram likes to train and educate homegrown competition.

 

The problem: Vivek’s caricature of America, while containing some elements of truth, is a painfully superficial analysis of a complicated problem. His tweet set off a firestorm of criticism from the right.

 

Does America really need hundreds of thousands of Indian systems administrators – working slave-hours for fear of getting deported – because it places too much value on 6A High School football in west Texas? Competitive sports don’t teach children the values of merit? Corporations making outstanding employees train cheaper foreign replacements on visas is simply meritocracy at work?

 

(Also didn’t the guy playing “Screech” turn into a drug-addled criminal, while “Slater,” Mario Lopez, is a successful show host to this day? Anyway, onward.)

 

Trump originally set off this debate online by appointing Sriram Krishnan, an Indian-American immigrant, to be a senior adviser to the White House on artificial intelligence.

 

Nationalist MAGA went ballistic because he’s been vocal about removing nation of origin caps on “skilled” legal immigration.

 

Tech MAGA generally, and Musk specifically, like Krishnan in part because he represents everything a good immigrant should be: legal, skilled, aggressive, innovative, entrepreneurial, and finally, a fully naturalized American.

 

In an attempt to support Trump’s pick, Musk fired off a take on H1-B immigration. At face value, H1-B is a lottery system US Immigration uses to attract technically savvy immigrants, coders, chemists, engineers, etc. Musk’s take was unchanged from what it’s been for years: There are more tech jobs than Americans trained in tech jobs, therefore H1-B good, more H1-B.

 

Except that’s not quite true. Depending on how you look at Census Bureau data, there could actually be more organic, American tech workers than tech jobs. Of course, this data doesn’t account for self selection, people who simply opted not to work for major tech companies.

 

At the same time, there’s no doubt the insanely rapid growth in tech puts recruiters in a bind. They’re constantly in a cycle of finding people the company needed a year ago. That urgency begets a system where expediency rules.

 

Expediency drives big tech toward third-party talent corporations who habitually abuse the H1-B immigration system. It’s easy to conclude they discriminate against Americans, because judges and juries have already done it.

 

Do the companies themselves take part in this discrimination? There’s at least some evidence they do as well. Facebook, Disney, Google have all waged legal battles over H1-B immigration law.

 

And the anecdotes in some of these cases are staggering. In one case, Americans were 20 percent more likely to be terminated and Indians represented a full two-thirds of the company’s US-based talent pool.

 

There’s no doubt America needs to produce more skilled workers, but it also needs to reduce abuse of a system meant to attract truly outstanding minds.

 

“This is one of my biggest issues in life, dude,” my brother, a former Marine, HS varsity athlete, now computer engineer, told me this morning. “I’m feeling the effects. Computer engineering is extremely niche but dominated by Indian immigrants. So I only make 90k when I should be making 150k.”

 

There’s something fundamentally wrong with tech companies using this system to hire armies of inexperienced foreign workers at 70% the rates of Americans, driving down wages and disincentivizing homegrown talent. It would be one thing if Big Tech were using H1-Bs to attract this generation’s Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla. But these visas are, by the numbers, disproportionately entry-level and overwhelmingly going to Indian citizens.

 

It’s a complicated problem for Trump 2.0, certainly not as easy as deporting brownbaggers at Home Depot who moonlight as petty criminals.

 

It also puts him at odds with Musk.

 

I guess we’ll really see who’s the bigger man.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Vivek and Elon waste no time becoming a target of controversy
« Reply #2305 on: December 28, 2024, 01:55:12 PM »
As expected

but not because of what they recommend to be cut
but over Visas .


What Vivek said does not bother me at all

It is true to some extent

We give awards to famous football and basketball players from high school up but who does know valedictorians or those with major academic achievement other then their mothers?

As for Musk going on line with an "f-u" you is not what we need or want.

For goodness sakes do not let this great idea fall on its face from day one.

The MSM will be all over this.   Schumer and crew moving in on the sidelines to watch with popcorn and beer.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Tucker takes on the Doge Bros
« Reply #2306 on: December 29, 2024, 10:38:00 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2311 on: January 02, 2025, 12:39:06 PM »
Quality thinking there.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Continuing the H1-B debate
« Reply #2312 on: January 05, 2025, 07:30:47 AM »
« Last Edit: January 05, 2025, 07:50:10 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Bangladesh diet is different
« Reply #2313 on: January 05, 2025, 07:56:33 AM »
« Last Edit: January 05, 2025, 08:02:42 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2314 on: January 05, 2025, 08:02:15 AM »
Third:

I would add that my understanding is that the lengua franca of India, particularly with regards to education, is English and that, just like America, the legal system has its roots in English law.

I remember reading several years ago of big law firms looking to use Indian lawyers to read the vast volumes of pretrial discovery documents in big cases instead of paying young American associates.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
WSJ: H1-B
« Reply #2317 on: January 08, 2025, 08:29:36 AM »


Putting America First Requires H-1B Visa Reform
Vital but far from perfect, the program needs a new method for selecting who gets in and who doesn’t.
By Jeremy Neufeld
Jan. 7, 2025 5:04 pm ET


A civil war has erupted among Donald Trump’s supporters over the H-1B program, America’s primary visa for skilled workers. Does putting “America First” mean ending the program, as Steve Bannon believes, or supporting it, as Elon Musk and Mr. Trump argue?

The debate stems from a fundamental flaw in the H-1B program: A randomized lottery is used to select which applications are reviewed. In effect this means the lottery determines who gets a visa.

Awarding visas by chance means that while the program can bring in world-class talent, including Mr. Musk, it also brings in thousands of middling workers. They compete with citizens for jobs and contribute less meaningfully to productivity and innovation. As constructed, then, the lottery doesn’t serve American interests and needs to be replaced.

The H-1B program is supposed to be reserved for workers in occupations requiring specialized knowledge, but that can include anything from biochemists earning hundreds of thousands to acupuncturists making less than the median household. This means that the country’s flagship skilled immigration program is seriously underdelivering, wasting scarce slots on low-paying jobs. Many are going to basic information-technology workers.

The problem isn’t the pool of talent; it’s how we choose from it. There are nearly four times as many H-1B applications every year as available slots. This disparity is worsened by companies that flood the system with applications for candidates meeting the bare minimum requirements for an H-1B. Companies that need top talent get crowded out. In 2022, 35% of all new H-1Bs went to companies dependent on them.

Mr. Trump seems to understand this. In a recent Truth Social post, he emphasized the importance of skilled immigrants and the utility of the H-1B program. In 2020 his U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services appointees tried to replace the lottery with a system to rank applicants by how much companies promise to pay them compared with other workers in the same job and region. This reform failed to go into effect.

While this would have been an improvement, it still would have prevented many companies employing early-career workers in high-paying occupations from getting the highly qualified talent the country needs. It also neglected the importance of the length of a worker’s potential contribution. This would set back efforts to retain top international students graduating from U.S. universities. A promising young graduate in STEM with specialized knowledge shouldn’t have his spot taken by a replaceable IT consultant simply because the latter would be paid slightly higher than the industry average.

There are other options for reform. A more straightforward ranking by salary regardless of occupation would allow us to prioritize the sectors most likely to contribute to innovation. These rankings could also be adjusted by age to ensure we are retaining bright professionals at the beginning of their careers. A 24-year-old making $150,000 is generally preferable to a 63-year-old making $160,000.

These reforms would increase the average H-1B wage by 41%. This would translate into a $1.1 trillion boost to America’s gross domestic product over 10 years—nearly twice the effect of the 2020 plan. In other words, without increasing the number of slots, we could nearly double the value of the H-1B program. Such a boost should be attractive to Republicans looking for pay-fors during the upcoming budget debate.

Reconciliation affords an opportunity to raise revenue by addressing the H-1B program’s problems. Congress should at least raise the fee to file an H-1B petition and the $60,000 wage threshold that allows staffing companies to depend so heavily on low-skill H-1B workers.

Despite its lottery woes, the H-1B program boasts a great track record, and shutting it down would extinguish the country’s primary pathway for global talent. By replacing the lottery, the Trump administration could lock out importers of cheap labor and make it easier for top talent to secure visas. Doing so would satisfy both sides of the “America First” civil war.

Mr. Neufeld is a senior immigration fellow at the Institute for Progress.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: January 13, 2025, 05:07:10 AM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Phil Gramm: The Immigrants America Needs
« Reply #2320 on: January 13, 2025, 03:01:02 PM »


The Immigrants America Needs
Limit asylum claims, reduce welfare and open the door to highly skilled foreign nationals.
By Phil Gramm
Jan. 13, 2025 2:25 pm ET


My wife’s grandmother, Soon Nam Char, was a picture bride. Orphaned in Korea when the Japanese killed her stiff-necked parents, she came to America in the early 20th century as part of an arranged marriage. My wife’s grandfather, who had come to Hawaii from Korea as a contract laborer, picked Soon Nam’s picture out of a book and signed a contract committing to work in the sugarcane fields in Hawaii for 13 months to pay her passage. Soon Nam arrived in a strange country, whose language she didn’t speak, to marry a man she had never met.

Ruth Cymber was my chief of staff when I served in the House and Senate. She was born in a relocation camp in Germany after World War II and came to America with her parents, who were Holocaust survivors. The immigration agent suggested that her family change her first name from Ruchla to Ruth and drop the “knopf” from their last name, Cymberknopf. They did.

Immigration has always been a tough issue for me because my life and the life of the nation have been and continue to be enriched by immigrants.

When the Senate was debating the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, I felt obligated to point out that if I were in Mexico with my two little sons and they were hungry, you would have to kill me to stop me from coming across the U.S. border. Still, I was committed to dealing with illegal immigration and the 3.2 million illegal migrants in the country at the time. The problem was that I couldn’t see how the legislation could fail to expand illegal immigration—which it did. By granting amnesty to illegal immigrants while failing to secure the border sufficiently, the legislation effectively erected a giant neon welcome sign across the southern border. By January 2007, the illegal-immigrant population had swelled to 11.8 million. The problem persists today: According to July 2024 Congressional Budget Office projections, from 2021 to 2026 the illegal-immigrant population in the U.S. will surge by 8.7 million more than it would have had pre-2020 trends continued.

The first step to ending the flood of illegal immigrants is to stop allowing people to come to the U.S. from anywhere and apply for asylum. The 1951 United Nations Convention on the Status of Refugees developed the principle of nonrefoulement, which dictated that refugees fleeing events that took place prior to 1951 may not be forced back to countries in which their lives or freedom were threatened. This agreement emerged in part out of Western nations’ collective guilt for failing to shelter Jews fleeing the Holocaust. Though the U.S. didn’t ratify the 1951 convention, it did ratify a subsequent 1967 protocol adopting an amended principle of nonrefoulement with no time constraints. The Refugee Act of 1980 codified that standard into national law.

But we live in a different world today, and the crisis on our border shows it. We must amend the Refugee Act of 1980 to require that, rather than applying for asylum at the border, refugees must apply at the American Embassy in their home country or in the country to which they have fled. This single action would stem the flood of asylum seekers who have overwhelmed our borders. It would also allow border-patrol agents to focus on protecting the border from non-asylum-seekers trying to enter illegally.

A second policy that cries out for reform is the Biden administration’s use of loopholes to grant special “legal status” to millions of illegal immigrants, undercutting the 1996 prohibition on welfare benefits for illegal aliens. According to a March 2023 report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform, the annual net costs of illegal immigration for American taxpayers exceed $150 billion.

With the average work-age household in the bottom 20% of income recipients receiving some $64,700 in government benefits annually (in 2022 dollars), the U.S. is in danger of perpetuating a welfare magnet so powerful that it will be hard to build a wall high enough to keep welfare-seekers out. We should deny all but temporary emergency welfare benefits to immigrants. We have room in the U.S. for people who come to work, but not for those who don’t want to work. Legal immigrants who work and pay Social Security and Medicare taxes qualify for those programs, but they should be ineligible for other means-tested programs. Their children born here would be citizens.

A vibrant program to attract the most ambitious and talented legal immigrants must also be a key element in any rational immigration reform. Hundreds of millions of people dream about coming to the U.S. They can’t all come. We should begin by reforming the H-1B visa program for highly skilled foreign workers by expanding the cap on the total number of visas, ending lottery selection and instituting a workable merit-based selection system. The world’s best and brightest want to come here, and we should welcome them.

From 2000 to 2023, 40% of Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics were won by immigrants. In 2023, that share was 67%. Forty-six percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children. Jonas Salk, a son of Russian immigrants, invented the polio vaccine. George Mitchell, a son of Greek immigrants, developed hydraulic fracturing.

Denying immigrants the ability to come to the U.S. illegally and ask for asylum is the foundation on which any workable immigration system must rest. A vibrant legal immigration policy based on opening the “Golden Door” to the world’s best and brightest would enrich America’s economy and culture and raise the nation’s living standards.

Mr. Gramm, a former chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the January 14, 2025, print edition as 'The Immigrants America Needs'



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Deportation, Marco Rubio, How many are here?
« Reply #2324 on: January 19, 2025, 11:13:03 AM »
https://twitter.com/i/status/1880352520884896085

How many are here? Not 11 million, that's a number from 10 years ago. It's 20, 25, 30 million now.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2325 on: January 19, 2025, 01:01:27 PM »
And notice how Welker fails to acknowledge any true points he makes and continues to poke at him and continuously has to get that last word in.

What a big mouth liar.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2326 on: January 19, 2025, 01:35:18 PM »
That undereye liner make-up brings out the angry in her facial expression.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2327 on: January 19, 2025, 06:56:30 PM »
And notice how Welker fails to acknowledge any true points he makes and continues to poke at him and continuously has to get that last word in.

What a big mouth liar.

Right. Her script is pre-written. Nothing to do with his answers. She's not listening, made obvious by her talking over him.

We used to have bias in the media, but this is way worse. Democrat operatives, manipulative propagandists. She doesn't even try to have a conversation with him or acknowledge anything he said.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
”A Full-Throated Endorsement of Article II”
« Reply #2328 on: January 22, 2025, 08:05:00 PM »
A very cogent analysis of Trump’s “invasion” based immigration orders:

https://reason.com/volokh/2025/01/22/president-trumps-invasion-executive-order/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2329 on: January 22, 2025, 10:01:52 PM »
THIS.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
"Unprecented", inhumane Deportation of millions of illegals
« Reply #2330 on: January 23, 2025, 06:47:31 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2331 on: January 23, 2025, 07:09:31 AM »
My understanding is that the Obama number is lie created by adding those turned back at the border into the mix.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20065
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2332 on: January 23, 2025, 09:01:05 AM »
"  My understanding is that the Obama number is lie created by adding those turned back at the border into the mix  "

I heard and understood that too.

They stop them at the border then turn around and tell us they were deported.

Usually Obamster / Dem games with the numbers - and lying about the truth.
I am so fed up with being lied to by these a holes.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19774
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2333 on: January 23, 2025, 02:50:10 PM »
My understanding is that the Obama number is lie created by adding those turned back at the border into the mix.

Right, but good ammunition for me in rebuttal to friends on the Left outraged by the idea of deporting millions. They were silent last time, and it's not my lie, it's theirs.  )

Source NYT makes it perfect.  They wouldn't lie or mislead us.   :wink:

The goal is zero illegals here and zero deported. We didn't bring this crisis on.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2025, 02:54:06 PM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2334 on: January 23, 2025, 08:21:53 PM »
My understanding is that the Obama number is lie created by adding those turned back at the border into the mix.

Right, but good ammunition for me in rebuttal to friends on the Left outragedby the idea of deporting millions. They were silent last time, and it's not my lie, it's theirs.  )

Source NYT makes it perfect.  They wouldn't lie or mislead us.   :wink:

The goal is zero illegals here and zero deported. We didn't bring this crisis on.

I ❤️ it when Doug gets evil….

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2335 on: January 25, 2025, 05:59:49 AM »
I get the temptation, but believe the strategem to be unwise in that it obfuscates the reality that Obama was the prequel to the Biden led invasion.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2336 on: January 25, 2025, 11:49:06 PM »
I get the temptation, but believe the strategem to be unwise in that it obfuscates the reality that Obama was the prequel to the Biden led invasion.

The two aren’t mutually exclusive and indeed can be used to make a larger point:

Obama and his media handmaidens think you are stupid! The read the polls, saw most Americans don’t believe in open borders, and so tried to fool you by juking deportation stats, just like the juked so many supposed facts during Covid, and with Hunter’s laptop, or FEMA’s NC response, and Biden’s horribly executed Afghanistan withdrawal, to name a few.

And while doing so Obama and his media handmaidens laid the groundwork for all the illegals let in on Biden’s watch. They funded the NGOs that enabled this invasion, the took money from FEMA’s budget meant to help Americans recover from disasters and funneled it to illegals, they tried to sell Trump’s wall off as scrap, and they called anyone that objected to any of it racist.

Given the scale of their lies and the shamelessness they displayed while speaking them what other issues are they doing the same with? January 6th? “Climate change?” The “integrity” of the 2020 elections? That you can change genders like you change clothing, using vulnerable adolescents as the vanguard for that effort? Are these the type of people we EVER want to hand executive power to again? Are these the type of people we want to elect in 2026, or do we want to use that midterm election to send a message that those that deceive us and think us fools will never forget?

As Trump hews back the structures that were Obama’s and then Biden’s bench, as he fires all the bureaucrats that produced nothing except a reliable Democratic Party voting bloc, as he reverses the “green” policies that starved the nation for energy and led to empty shelves in stores and staples families need becoming ever more costly it’s up to each of us to demand an honest accounting at every ballot box so we we can perform our civic duty and make sure those that damaged our nation and children so greatly are unable to do so ever again.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Colombia tries getting uppity
« Reply #2337 on: January 26, 2025, 02:56:26 PM »


https://x.com/i/web/status/1883540269481750568

And then Trump hit them with tariff threat and they folded like a cheap suit.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2338 on: January 26, 2025, 03:17:34 PM »
Apologies for not getting back to you on this.

I was in San Fran all week training the PD there and now work on catching up here.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Fraud in H1-B numbers
« Reply #2339 on: January 26, 2025, 03:36:34 PM »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2340 on: January 28, 2025, 04:28:48 PM »
Apologies for not getting back to you on this.

I was in San Fran all week training the PD there and now work on catching up here.

Not sure how I posted it twice. I removed the dupe.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
X Thread re Impact of Trump’s Freeze on Illegal Immigration
« Reply #2341 on: January 28, 2025, 04:33:26 PM »
Nicely sourced thread naming names of the NGOs that “assisted” illegal immigration. One (of many) points made is that Biden’s INS chief came from one such NGO:

https://x.com/njhochman/status/1884339632210600161

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Sanctuary City Mayors Subpoenaed
« Reply #2342 on: January 28, 2025, 04:44:03 PM »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Trump Orders 30,000 Beds @ Gitmo be Readied for the “Worst of the Worst”
« Reply #2343 on: January 29, 2025, 04:00:42 PM »
Something for MS 13 et al to look forward to:

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/guantamo-bay-immigration/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2344 on: January 29, 2025, 07:00:39 PM »
Sec Def Hegseth served there, knows it well.

This should also serve to put an end to calls to close Gitmo down because "there are only a handful of prisoners there blah blah."


Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3471
    • View Profile
Crippling the NGO System
« Reply #2346 on: February 01, 2025, 10:03:36 AM »
This is off of columnist Don Surber’s Highlights of the Week:

ITEM 26: Nate Hochman tweeted, “The immigration crisis isn’t an accident. It’s a well-oiled system, facilitated by powerful NGOs—and funded by your tax dollars. By defunding the NGOs, Trump is crippling the entire system.”

What a government. It will imprison you for saying the rosary at an abortion clinic but give millions to Catholic Charities.

BBG here: charting what all collapses as a result of this funding drought—should be easy to track via the MSM gnashing of teeth, wailing, & sob stories—will be telling.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 73360
    • View Profile
Re: Immigration; weaponized immigration; deportation
« Reply #2347 on: February 01, 2025, 01:09:11 PM »
I am gobsmacked at the apparently legit serious effort at vasectomization of the NGOs.   

MAGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!