Author Topic: Turkey  (Read 136923 times)

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3766
    • View Profile
Turkey Elections: Ruling Party Takes a Big Hit
« Reply #350 on: April 01, 2024, 10:41:26 AM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Turkey-Syria
« Reply #351 on: July 27, 2024, 04:16:16 PM »
July 23, 2024
View On Website

Turkey’s Uphill Battle to a Rapprochement With Syria
Ideology and the presence of several foreign actors complicates the situation.
By: Hilal Khashan
Since the 1950s, Turkey has expressed interest in the domestic affairs of Syria more than any other Arab country, driven by a long shared border, demographic overlap, security concerns and Ankara’s regional ambitions. Turkey even threatened to invade Syria in 1957 over the growing Soviet influence in the country, fearing that the Syrian Communist Party could stage a military coup. It again threatened Damascus with war over its support for the irredentist Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK.

However, the two countries’ relations improved significantly after the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, won parliamentary elections in 2002 and announced its “zero problems with neighbors” policy. After becoming Turkish prime minister in 2003, AKP leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan also forged a personal friendship with Syrian President Bashar Assad. But the Syrian uprising in 2011 cut short their detente as Erdogan sided with the opposition. He believed that the Arab uprisings could help make Turkey a prominent regional power. His gamble only antagonized many Arab regimes and eventually led to Turkey’s semi-isolation in the region. In his bid to reverse this trajectory, Erdogan has since made several gestures to restore ties with Arab states, including Syria – even indicating that he would meet in person with Assad. However, given the complexity of the situation in Syria and the presence of several foreign actors there, resolving the two countries’ differences will be an uphill battle.

Origins of the Conflict

When Mustafa Kemal Ataturk announced the establishment of the modern Turkish state in 1923, he pursued an ambitious national policy focused on creating a capable central state and solid national identity. Under Ataturk’s plan, the state would concentrate on internal security and distance itself from its regional neighbors in West Asia and North Africa, opting instead to identify with European secularism and ways of life. Ataturk’s untimely death in 1938 weakened his Republican People’s Party, leading to a landslide victory for the opposition Democrat Party in 1950. Its leaders, Adnan Menderes and Celal Bayar, loosened Ataturk’s clampdown on Islam and engaged Turkey in Middle Eastern affairs by joining the Baghdad Pact in 1955. This move drew Ankara closer to the Hashemites in Iraq and Jordan while alienating it from Egypt and Syria, where pan-Arabism surged.

Turkey’s current borders were drawn between 1920 and 1938, when Turkish forces entered the Iskenderun district and placed it under Ankara’s control. However, there is a big difference between Turkey’s territorial and ideological boundaries – a disparity that has invariably been a source of tension between Turkey and Arab countries, namely Syria.

The idea of a harmonious Turkish identity dominated political discourse among the Turkish elite beginning when the Kurds were described as “mountain Turks.” In the 1940s, efforts to “Turkify” the economy began by weakening non-Muslim segments of the population (Christians and Jews) through the imposition of a wealth tax in 1942 at a rate that reached 80 percent. Hostility toward non-Muslims peaked in 1955, when crowds of Turks targeted Armenian and Greek businesses and individuals on Istanbul’s famous Independence Avenue.

The 1980 military coup initiated what emerged as the Islamic approach to confronting Kurdish nationalist, communist and leftist tendencies. It served as a convenient basis for the use of the term neo-Ottomanism for the first time by Turgut Ozal, Turkey’s prime minister between 1983 and 1989, who put forward the slogan “from the Adriatic to the Wall of China.” Even before assuming a government position, Ahmet Davutoglu (who would later become the country’s foreign minister and then prime minister) referred to neo-Ottomanism as a political ideology. He believed that the root of the most critical problems in Turkish foreign policy was the failure to harmonize it with the Ottoman legacy and develop an ambitious new agenda.

Davutoglu’s pursuit of strategic depth essentially involved a restoration of historical and cultural ties between Turkey and the former regions of the Ottoman Empire. Turkish officials often referred to the country’s historic responsibilities toward the Middle East and North Africa. In 2009, Davutoglu said that Turkey has an enduring legacy from the Ottoman era and must pay attention to the countries of the region.

The Arab Spring uprisings presented an opportunity for the AKP to implement its neo-Ottoman project. From this perspective, then-Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan saw Syria as an internal Turkish issue. He emphasized that his government would not stay out of the conflict there and argued that the Turkish people were the custodians of Syrian ancestral land.

Turkish Demands

There are two main reasons behind Turkey’s desire to normalize relations with the Assad regime. First, Erdogan is determined to prevent the PKK from establishing a mini-state in northern Syria. Second, he is convinced that he needs Assad’s cooperation to bring as many Syrian refugees as possible back to Syria. With 3 million Syrians now living in Turkey, the situation has become untenable as a growing portion of Turkish society refuses to allow Syrian refugees to remain in their country. If Erdogan meets with Assad, he will ask him to secure their repatriation to Syria and expects the Syrian government to return their property to them.

Erdogan also wants Assad to take an unambiguous position on the Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, which the Turkish government views as indistinguishable from the PKK. The YPG operates under the banner of the Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF, which controls more than a third of Syrian territory and, according to Ankara, threatens Turkish national security. Turkey’s security doctrine seeks to fight terrorist groups in their strongholds before they reach the country, in part by establishing military bases in places like Syria and Iraq. What worries Turkey is that the Kurds in eastern Syria now have civil institutions and a functioning bureaucracy. They seem to believe that they are on the path to achieving their historical dream of establishing a state of their own, a possibility Turkey cannot tolerate.

Ankara is also now concerned that municipal elections set for next month in northeastern Syria’s Kurdish autonomous region will grant legitimacy to the YPG and its political wing, the Democratic Union Party. It’s also uneasy about the fact that these elections do not concern the Syrian government, which does not view the Kurds as an imminent threat.

Syrian Demands

Given Erdogan’s fickle foreign policy, Assad realizes how eager the Turkish president is to negotiate with him and wants to improve his bargaining position in partnership with Russia, which supports their potential rapprochement. The Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said that any normalization of relations with Ankara would have to involve the withdrawal of Turkish forces from northern Syria and the cessation of Ankara’s support for Syrian opposition groups.

Despite their disagreement on several issues, there’s a high possibility that a meeting will take place. However, it’s unlikely to produce tangible results because Assad cannot change the realities in Syria, where the United States controls the main Kurdish militant groups and sympathizes with the Kurdish state project. In addition, when the uprising started in 2011, Syrian Sunnis overwhelmingly demanded Assad’s ouster. Now that he’s pursuing a policy that he has called “useful Syria,” an arrangement in which Sunnis would never again constitute a demographic majority in the country, it’s unlikely that he will allow Sunni Syrian refugees to return to their homes.

Assad is also unable to make certain decisions on his own. External powers like Iran and Russia could ultimately form an invisible front against Turkey, meaning that a meeting between Erdogan and Assad will not be enough to solidify a rapprochement. Turkey must therefore be ready for lengthy negotiations with other influential actors in the country. The pressing question is: What interests can help the two countries overcome their differences?

One issue on which they somewhat agree is the Kurdish question. Both classify the YPG as a terrorist group and heavily criticize its U.S.-backed military activity and the possibility of an independent Kurdish entity. It is in the interest of both parties to maintain security and have the Turkish and Syrian armies control their shared border, which stretches more than 560 miles.

However, Turkey’s primary motivation for normalizing relations with Damascus is the establishment of a buffer zone between Turkish territory and the Kurdish-led region in northern Syria. Some in Syria want to revive the Adana Agreement – a 1998 deal under which Syria agreed to stop supporting the PKK and expel its leader to avert war – provided that a new version includes radical Islamic armed opposition groups in Idlib, such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. However, it is not yet clear that Turkey will accept confronting these factions before reaching a comprehensive agreement that ends the war in Syria and defines its postwar government and relationship with neighboring countries.

One proposal for dealing with the armed opposition factions in Idlib is to include the moderate ones under the so-called Fifth Corps of the Syrian army, tasked with defending the border. This includes the Turkish-backed Syrian national army patrolling segments of the Turkish-Syrian border. Both the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian regime have indicated that they would accept the plan. As for Turkey, it is amenable to the redeployment of its forces in northern Syria and to the provision of guarantees that it will withdraw all of its troops upon restoring border security, provided that Kurdish forces stay away from it. Turkey has also expressed its openness to providing guarantees to Russia to withdraw from Syria when the conflict ends. Assad knows that a rapid withdrawal of Turkish forces from northern Syria will create a security vacuum that no one can fill. It will also lead to chaos in the north because Turkey controls the armed opposition there.

Assad does not believe that Iran will accept a Turkey-Syria rapprochement because it would weaken Iran's presence in his country, to Ankara’s benefit. However, Iran is preoccupied with its internal affairs and unrelenting Israeli airstrikes in Syria, and it doesn’t seem capable of stalling a reconciliation between Assad and Erdogan. Either way, serious negotiations between Turkey and Syria will have to wait until after the U.S. presidential election. It is Washington, after all, that ultimately pulls the strings in the Syrian conflict.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Turkey's pivot to China
« Reply #352 on: August 16, 2024, 07:23:04 AM »


August 16, 2024
View On Website
Open as PDF

The Truth About Turkey’s ‘Pivot’ to China
Ankara wants to exploit trans-Atlantic security agreements, not destroy them.
By: Antonia Colibasanu

Turkey is on a diplomatic offensive to justify a foreign policy that some believe is too friendly to too many. On Aug. 11, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler said in an interview that Turkey's NATO membership does not preclude it from developing relations with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. This comes roughly a month after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said point blank that Turkey wants to be a part of the SCO and after Turkey’s ambassador to Beijing explained that joining the SCO and the BRICS would complement rather than conflict with its membership in Western organizations.

This is puzzling for many. The SCO is a political, economic and security alliance founded in 2001 by China and Russia that has since expanded to include Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, India, Pakistan, Iran and Belarus. It means to enhance cooperation and trust among member states, maintain regional security and stability, combat terrorism and extremism, and promote economic development. It’s not a military organization, so it’s not a direct competitor to NATO, but many believe it is an organization that legitimizes illiberal norms and opens exceptions to otherwise applicable international norms, providing a sort of haven for nations that want to avoid the scrutiny of Western-dominated organizations. (Turkey’s interest in joining isn’t exactly new, but it has shown a much greater sense of urgency lately.) The BRICS, meanwhile, comprises countries that seek to challenge the political and economic power of the wealthier nations of North America and Western Europe. To many in the West, it is considered nothing less than a challenge to its own model for the world.

In seeking to work with both groups, Turkey has shown a willingness to maintain good working relations with the two biggest challengers to Western power: Russia and China. Turkey has cultivated a cautious but neighborly relationship with Russia, but its ties to China have recently begun to grow. Bilateral trade has increased over the past five years, and official visits have intensified. (Turkey’s ministers of foreign affairs, energy and natural resources, and industry and technology have all traveled to Beijing this year.) Though recent statements suggest increased security ties between the two countries, Sino-Turkish relations are in fact based on shared economic interests.

Given the current international business environment, the challenge of global economic restructuring, the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fallout of the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, how Turkey and China shape their relationship is critical to understanding the future of global trade and investment corridors. While the West is considering de-risking or decoupling for economic and security reasons, Turkey seems to be moving in the opposite direction. Its strategic location, its membership in Western organizations, and its economic ties to the European Union will necessarily shape current and future security arrangements.

Turkey’s interest in China is straightforward: It needs investment in key sectors to enhance its energy security and sustain its technological development. It also needs foreign capital to tame inflation (which stands above 60 percent), reinforce its currency and pay for ongoing reconstruction following last year’s devastating earthquake. Crucially, Ankara knows that China needs to address some of its own economic problems, which can be at least tempered with new trade routes and markets. It clearly believes they are ideally suited to help each other out.

The Turkish government has urged China to increase investment in a variety of sectors – solar and nuclear energy, high-tech infrastructure and AI. And the newly constructed Sinovac vaccine center is a good example of how the two countries can improve ties in specific areas. But a much more important example – the agreement between Chinese carmaker BYD and Turkey to build a production plant in Manisa province – shows how the two can parlay their ties into something more. The agreement came after a slew of EU measures to lower imports of Chinese electronic vehicles into the bloc. Among them was an increase in customs tariffs from 10 percent to 17.4 percent specifically levied against BYD. Though the tariffs are temporary, the EU will likely meet in October to decide whether they become permanent. If they do, they will almost certainly further decrease BYD’s market share in Europe.

China’s loss was Turkey’s gain. After the EU enacted its protectionist measures, Ankara imposed an additional 40 percent tariff on imports of vehicles from China – only to later exempt Chinese companies that invest in Turkey. The exemption was tailored to suit BYD’s needs but may well attract other manufacturers. For China, there is an even greater benefit. Turkey and the EU share a customs union that states that anything made in Turkey is exempt from customs duties when sold to the EU. Moreover, factories set up in Turkey do not have to apply EU regulations to labor or production standards. So long as the final products meet the European consumers’ standards, they can be sold in the EU market. This translates into lower production costs.

China's Slow Start to Foreign Direct Investment to Turkey

(click to enlarge)

This explains why Erdogan, Industry Minister Mehmet Fatih Kacir and BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu attended the agreement’s signing ceremony in Istanbul on July 8 – just four days after Erdogan attended an SCO summit in Kazakhstan to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Besides the immediate business benefits Turkey’s proximity to Europe offers Chinese investors, there is also the matter of long-term strategy. From China's point of view, its growing economic presence in Turkey is part and parcel of its growing use of the Middle Corridor – itself a part of the Belt and Road Initiative – as the war in Ukraine restricts use of the Northern Corridor, and as the Gaza war threatens transit through the Red Sea. Given China’s near-existential need to sell its goods, new trade routes and new markets mean more than just dollars and cents.

The same could be said of Turkey. For Ankara, the money is nice, but the improvement in its strategic posture is nicer. With Russia weakening as a result of the Ukraine war, Turkey sees China as the only viable challenger to Western (read: American) global dominance. It may maintain a close alliance with Washington, but it wants to develop its approach to regional security. This led Turkey to purchase Russian-made S-400 air defense systems, which ultimately caused its expulsion from the U.S.' F-35 program. It was only Turkey’s agreement to ratify Swedish NATO membership that rekindled its relations with the U.S. Ankara has now agreed to pay $23 billion for the most sophisticated variant of the F-16 aircraft. This is just one example of how Turkey uses diplomacy to gain leverage in negotiations with the West. Its budding relationship with China is absolutely part of that strategy.

Overall, what seems to be a new foreign policy oriented toward China is a planned, pragmatic move by Turkey to increase its strategic options and autonomy, which eventually will be turned into bargaining chips in discussions with NATO and the U.S. The profits are icing on the cake. That China's leadership will avoid confronting the West over the matter will only benefit Turkey, which wants not so much to destroy trans-Atlantic security arrangements but to gain marginal advantages from exploiting them.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile
This Erdagon guy is becoming a menace
« Reply #353 on: September 03, 2024, 08:57:15 AM »
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/turkey-wants-join-brics-bloc-154011773.html

I don't know if Turkey should get booted out of NATO or not but the cons of keeping them in is rising and the gains - well I have not read any.

I read they may not even let the US remove our nucs from our base there.  Risk they may seize control which of course would be an act of war .


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
Re: Turkey
« Reply #354 on: September 03, 2024, 06:37:34 PM »


"I read they may not even let the US remove our nucs from our base there."

I had not heard this and would love to read up on it.   Any citation?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Could this have something to do with Trump/Musk's call to Turkey?
« Reply #355 on: November 09, 2024, 09:02:37 AM »


Turkish expectations. Meanwhile, Turkey’s trade minister said Ankara anticipated that financial pressures it has seen due to sanctions against Russia will ease after Trump’s election. He explained that Turkish companies and banks have been under serious strain because of the sanctions.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20362
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 20121
    • View Profile
Re: Nato menace stops all ties with Israel
« Reply #357 on: November 14, 2024, 09:19:03 AM »
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkey-severs-all-relations-israel-says-erdogan

Turkiye has been a thorn for decades. Apparently they are masters at playing the US off against Russia.

Since they aren't really an ally it would be easy to tell them to go to hell, but then they join the Russia camp with Iran etc.

Maybe Rubio and the new team will have Better ideas of what to do about this.

Cutting off ties (they never had) is different than invading or funding Hamas.

The current war with Hamas will soon be yesterday's news.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 09:23:24 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Turkey's Neo-Ottoman Agenda in Africa
« Reply #358 on: February 11, 2025, 08:49:05 AM »


February 11, 2025
View On Website
Open as PDF

Turkey’s Neo-Ottoman Agenda in Africa
Ankara’s long-term strategy is starting to bear fruit.
By: Ronan Wordsworth

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wants his country to reclaim its status as a regional power. Embodying an ideology often referred to as neo-Ottomanism, he envisions a Turkey that is more powerful in the lands the Ottoman Empire once controlled – not just the Middle East but North and Central Africa too. This goal will necessarily require the advancement of Ankara’s Islamic worldview to boost its religious credentials. But it will also necessarily bring Turkey into competition with Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, all of which have the same ambitions that, crucially, demand greater engagement in Africa. Put simply, the path toward a neo-Ottoman empire will inevitably take Ankara through Africa.

Somalia offers a key lesson in Turkey’s Africa strategy. Turkey’s largest foreign military base is housed in Somalia, and Turkish troops have been involved in training the Somali army since 2010. Last year, they signed an official defense pact, as well as an agreement for joint exploration and exploitation of oil and gas deposits off the Somali coast. Turkish naval vessels now patrol the area for pirates, and some drilling work has commenced. As important, Turkish products are now readily available in Mogadishu, a strategically located market in the increasingly important Indian Ocean basin. Meanwhile, Ankara has established Turkish cultural and Islamic centers and schools and has provided much-needed humanitarian aid. Two decades of gradually developed influence is starting to bear fruit: Turkey’s presence in Somalia has begun to open doors in West and North Africa that have recently been shut to the West, allowing Ankara to become the region’s new economic benefactor.

The Somali blueprint illustrates a three-pronged approach to Africa: diplomatic, economic and security. Since Erdogan came to power in the early 2000s, Turkey has prioritized African diplomatic outreach, opening more embassies on the continent than any other country. Erdogan has visited 31 African countries on official visits as leader, developing personal relations with ruling parties, but he has always focused on the Muslim-majority countries, where he can talk up his country's Islamic bona fides. Turkish Airlines flies to more African countries than any other airline, and the government provides vast amounts of humanitarian and development money to many African nations to cover infrastructure, education and energy projects and to provide food and health care. Meanwhile, Turkish dramas are widely watched in places like Ethiopia, where hundreds of Turkish businesses now operate, and Turkish-affiliated schools and mosques are frequently constructed. (The Maarif International Schools have been an especially useful source of soft power. Affiliated with Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party and operating 175 campuses in 25 countries, the schools advance Turkish narratives and a Turkish-centric vision of Islam.)

Economically, Turkey’s relationship to the continent has long been defined by trade. Indeed, Erdogan has long seen Africa as a valuable export market for Turkish industrial goods. From 2004 to 2024, trade with Africa increased nearly tenfold, growing from a value of $5.4 billion to roughly $50 billion and covering manufactured goods such heavy and agricultural machinery, chemicals, auto parts, steel, electronics, textiles and raw materials. In the intervening years, Ankara has signed dozens of trade agreements with individual countries and regional groupings, including the Economic Community of West African States. The Alliance of Sahel States, which comprises countries that have recently turned away from the West and toward Russia, also has very good relations with Turkey.

But the relationship has recently evolved into something more as Turkey becomes more involved in infrastructure projects. (Unlike China, which often directly funds these kinds of projects, Turkey tends to implement them through contracts with large African lenders like the African Development Bank. In this way, Turkey avoids accusations of debt-trap diplomacy.) Erdogan boasted of $71.1 billion in projects awarded to Turkish companies under the Turkish Contractors Association since 2021. Existing projects include roads, airports, hospitals and government buildings such as the Modjo-Hawassa Highway in Ethiopia, an international airport near Dakar in Senegal, a railway in Tanzania, conference centers for the 2019 African Union summit and a new national airport in Niger.

Ankara has also been increasingly involved in energy projects, predominantly oil and gas exploration and extraction through the state-owned Turkish Petroleum Corporation. In addition to the offshore developments in Somalia, it participates in projects in Algeria, Libya, Nigeria and Sudan. And it’s begun to dip its toes in renewable energy projects and power plant construction too.

Another important economic facet of Turkey’s influence in Africa is the defense industry. Turkish drones have become highly sought after in many countries, especially around the Sahel, where they are able to cover large areas of open space that central governments typically have little access to. Initial contracts with Morocco and Algeria in 2021 have grown to include Senegal, Nigeria, Niger, Togo, Chad, Mali, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Morocco, Libya, Egypt, Tunisia and Angola. Arms sales are similarly important. Turkey has been one of the main winners of Russia’s struggle to supply arms to the continent. Defense contractors increased their sales 29 percent in 2024, supplying military equipment such as armored vehicles, firearms, ammunition, artillery and naval vessels. Turkey’s biggest defense exporters include Baykar, Turkish Aerospace Industries, ASFAT, MKE and ARCA.

On the security front, Turkey has steadily expanded its footprint with several initiatives, particularly training programs, that cover counterterrorism, intelligence and peacekeeping, the establishment of military academies and training centers, and hosting joint exercises. For years, Turkey has assisted Nigeria in fighting the Boko Haram Islamist movement, helped stem the flow of illicit arms, and supplied over $5 million to Mauritania and the G5 Sahel to combat Islamic insurgencies.

This steady expansion has positioned Turkey to benefit from the current state of affairs in West Africa. Several countries have kicked out French troops stationed on their borders, U.N. missions have been expelled, and the U.S. has shown less and less interest in the region. (There’s no reason to believe the new Trump administration will change course.) The resulting power vacuum first allowed Russia to gain a foothold through the Wagner Group, and now Turkish private military contractors, primarily SADAT, are following suit as Wagner suffers setbacks. SADAT offers a similar value proposition: security in exchange for access to minerals. Importantly, SADAT is closely tied to Turkey's National Intelligence Organization (and to Erdogan himself) through its founder and former general adviser Adnan Tanrıverdi. The group’s standing thus allows it to operate as an agent of foreign influence while giving it a degree of plausible deniability.

Turkey hopes to parlay its successes in Libya into a wider campaign of influence. To that end, Turkish intelligence and the Turkish military have formed deeper cooperation with the Alliance of Sahel States now that France is gone. Turkish intelligence has established a significant presence in the landlocked nation of Niger, a country that could serve as a strategic hub for larger Turkish ambitions while allowing troops to be stationed there. This explains why Turkish leaders have been engaging more with Niger by, for example, supplying military hardware and resources requested by the junta when Western countries refused.

Drones and arms have been used as diplomatic “carrots” to leaders potentially under Western sanctions to secure Turkish influence and long-term arms supply contracts. In conjunction with Turkish government overtures, these moves have opened new markets for the Turkish defense industry – all of which jibes with Erdogan’s goal to expand Turkish defense sales. Expect similar moves going forward.

Turkey’s multifaceted approach to Africa is already starting to see some returns. Trade has been markedly increased over the past decade, as has security cooperation – private and public alike. Though Ankara’s involvement could eventually cause a clash with the West, so far it is trying to portray itself as a neutral alternative to China. The United States will likely go along with Turkey’s strategy; it undermines Russia, creates competition with China and pits Turkey against countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE with similar designs in Africa. A new Ottoman empire is a far way off, but for now it seems as if Turkey has some space to operate.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
Re: Turkey
« Reply #359 on: February 14, 2025, 09:37:11 AM »


February 14, 2025
View On Website
Open as PDF

Turkey and the Geopolitical Roads Ahead
One by one, the factors that contained the country have fallen away.
By: Kamran Bokhari

Turkey is resurging as a regional power. The fall of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria in 2024 and Azerbaijan’s takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023 demonstrate Ankara’s growing ability to project power across multiple regions. However, domestic and external challenges will constrain its geopolitical ascent. Despite these limits, Turkey will likely act more unilaterally, especially as shifting U.S.-European security ties redefine NATO.

Uncontained

Turkey’s intelligence chief, Ibrahim Kalin, flew to Tehran on Feb. 8 for meetings with his Iranian counterpart, Esmail Khatib, and the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Adm. Ali Akbar Ahmadian. Their discussions covered the fragile situation in Syria, Kurdish separatism, the Islamic State group and the ceasefire in Gaza. However, Iran’s concerns reportedly extend beyond these well-worn issues. On Feb. 6, two days before Kalin’s trip, U.K.-based Amwaj.media reported that Iranian officials are increasingly anxious about Turkish and Azerbaijani efforts to establish a transport route, known as the Zangezur Corridor, through southern Armenia – despite Armenian (and Iranian) objections. Just last month Ahmadian traveled to Azerbaijan and Armenia, where he reiterated Tehran’s opposition to any “geopolitical changes in the region” that threaten Iranian-Armenian relations.

In both the South Caucasus and the Middle East, Iran had long kept Turkey strategically contained. But that began to change in 2020, when in a little more than six weeks Turkey’s ally Azerbaijan defeated Iran-backed Armenia and captured the majority of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. The balance of power between Tehran and Ankara has swung even more toward the latter since 2023. In September of that year, Azerbaijani forces broke the December 2020 ceasefire to complete their takeover of Nagorn-Karabakh. Armenia’s defeat marked a major strategic reversal for Iran along its northern flank.

Iran suffered a much more serious loss later, when on Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacked Israel, sparking a regional war. Tehran’s attempts to wear down Israel with attacks from different directions backfired, as Israel responded by destroying the leadership and offensive capabilities of Hezbollah, the Islamic republic’s premier regional proxy. Worse still, Iran was drawn into a direct clash with Israel that exposed the deficiencies in Tehran’s defenses. I predicted at the time that this created an opening for Turkey and its Syrian rebel allies to try to take down the Syrian regime. They began their offensive a few months later, and in less than two weeks the Assad regime was history.

Turkey and Surrounding Areas
(click to enlarge)

Assad’s downfall presented Turkey with a strategic opportunity along its southern flank that has not existed for more than a century. Consolidating its gains in Syria, Turkey is now the primary supporter of the transitional Syria government, assisting it in the rebuilding of the Syrian military. But while it enjoys great latitutde, Ankara is also up against significant constraints. For starters, it needs to neutralize the threat in northeast Syria of Kurdish separatism, which threatens to destabilize heavily Kurdish regions in southeast Turkey.

It may get a boost from the second Trump administration, which in its eagerness to reduce the U.S. military presence in the region is seeking partners to do the heavy lifting on regional security and may be open to a deal with Turkey. (On the other hand, the Trump administration’s stated plans to control and rebuild the Gaza Strip, evicting the Palestinians in the process, is a serious complication, as is the threatened breakdown of the ceasefire.)

However, while Ankara is engaged in what will likely be a multiyear effort to help Syria’s new authorities absorb the Kurds into their new political order, it must also prevent a resurgence of the Islamic State group in Syria. Turkey also wants to avoid repeating the mistakes it made in the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring uprising, when its support for Islamist opposition groups triggered severe pushback from the Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. This time, Ankara wants to include the Arab nations as partners in post-Assad Syria.

Turkey also needs to reach an understanding with Iran and Israel, the two most important potential spoilers in the region. Iranian interference could come via Iraq, which it dominates, or via the Syrian minorities – constituting approximately 40 percent of the Syrian population – with whom Tehran enjoys influence. Meanwhile, Israel started setting up a buffer zone in southwest Syria on the same day that Assad fled Damascus. Israeli troops are not at risk of running into Turkey’s own forces in Syria, confined as they are to the country’s northern border areas, but eventually the two governments will need to come to terms with one another. Regardless of how the situation plays out, Turkey will play a leading role in reshaping the region.

Wider Ambitions

The success or failure of Turkish policies along its southern frontier will determine its ability to influence more distant regions, namely North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and the maritime space in the northwestern periphery of the Indian Ocean basin. Its dealings with Syria are also linked with Turkey’s evolving relationship with Russia, especially given the fluctuating balance of power in the Black Sea basin. Although Ankara would prefer not to sour relations with Moscow, this has not stopped it from exploiting Russia’s decline since its costly invasion of Ukraine, including taking actions that weaken Russian influence in the South Caucasus. The Kremlin’s next fear is that Ankara will use Russia’s weakness to expand its own influence in Central Asia.

Opportunities could also open for Turkey farther to its north, as the United States takes a step back and the Europeans take the lead role in supporting Ukraine, especially after the war. Preoccupied with the devolution of their union, the Europeans inadvertently could leave space for the Turks to expand their influence into southeastern Europe, particularly the Western Balkans.

Of course, these potential developments will take time, and domestic factors will greatly determine the shape and pace of Turkey’s rise. Ankara will not rein in extreme inflation, restore foreign investment or narrow its worsening fiscal deficits overnight. At least as significant is the growing challenge to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party from an energized opposition.

Turkey has long since outgrown being content with membership in the West’s military alliance. Across the board, Turks of various ideological orientations seem ready for their country to assert itself with more intensity and over a wider distance – if for no other reason than to protect itself from the ravages of immense change happening all around them. Turkey’s ascent will only gain momentum as shifts in U.S. foreign policy reshape the global order.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Turkey and Turmoil in Europe and the Middle East
« Reply #360 on: March 13, 2025, 09:00:20 AM »


March 13, 2025
View On Website
Open as PDF

Turkey and Turmoil in Europe and the Middle East
From the Arabian Sea to the Black Sea, Ankara’s opportunities to seize a central role are vast.
By: Kamran Bokhari

Massive changes on Turkey’s northern and southern flanks are reshaping its strategic landscape. U.S.-Russia diplomacy has important implications for European security, creating an opening for Ankara to expand its influence in Eastern Europe. However, Saudi Arabia’s geopolitical rise complicates Turkey’s bid for dominance in the Middle East, despite its gains in Syria. Turkey will likely find greater room to maneuver in the Black Sea basin but will face major challenges in the Middle East.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk visited Turkey on March 12 to discuss both countries’ assessments of the first round of U.S.-Ukraine talks held in Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, the Financial Times reported on March 11 that NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has privately urged EU leaders to ease tensions with Turkey and engage more actively with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government. Rutte’s recommendation aligns with U.S. demands for Europe to take the lead in securing the Continent.

Also on March 12, Erdogan hailed a power-sharing deal between Syria’s interim president and the leader of the country’s Kurdish separatist movement. The agreement came just days after Turkey’s own Kurdish rebels declared a ceasefire and signaled their willingness to disband. The significance of these twin developments for Turkey’s position cannot be overstated.

The Southern Flank

Turkey has fought the insurgent group known as the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) for more than 40 years. The U.S.-led regime change in Iraq in 2003 exacerbated Ankara’s concerns by enabling the creation of an autonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq. However, internal Kurdish discord helped Turkey contain the PKK within its Iraqi sanctuary.

Syria’s Kurds posed a greater threat to Turkey due to their close ties with the PKK. The emergence of a Kurdish self-rule region in northeastern Syria during that country’s civil war prompted Turkey’s military to intervene and establish a buffer zone. The U.S. decision to back the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces against the Islamic State group expanded the Kurdish autonomous region, causing unprecedented strain in U.S.-Turkey ties. These tensions persisted until the Assad regime’s collapse in December 2024, when the Turkey-backed Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham took power in Damascus.

Turkey's Southern Flank

(click to enlarge)

Meanwhile, the second Trump administration has shifted U.S. foreign policy, pressing allies to take the lead in managing their regions. This, along with Erdogan’s progress toward a peace deal with the Kurdish rebels, could free Ankara to expand its influence in the region and beyond. But first Turkey must ensure that Syria’s Kurds are integrated into the new Syrian political regime and, more important, bring its own Kurdish population into the national fold.

At the same time, Turkey must counter Iran, which, despite its setbacks, could still disrupt Ankara’s plans in the Levant – especially as Washington pursues a detente with Tehran. Turkey also needs to reach an understanding with Israel, which has significant security interests in Syria. The most complex and enduring challenge, however, comes from fellow Sunni power Saudi Arabia. Washington has elevated Riyadh’s regional and global standing, as seen in its mediation role in U.S.-Russia-Ukraine talks, complicating Turkey’s strategic ambitions in the Middle East.

The European Arena

As Turkey navigates the complicated terrain of the Middle East, new opportunities are emerging in Europe. In a significant shift, European powers are now engaging with Ankara to forge a new security architecture for the Continent. Despite being a NATO member, Turkey has long faced European resistance to its pursuit of EU membership. Over the past decade, Turkey’s interest in joining the bloc has waned as the EU grapples with internal uncertainty.

Turkey's European Arena

(click to enlarge)

Yet, for decades Turkey has viewed itself as a European power, a perspective rooted in the Ottoman Empire’s historical presence in Eastern Europe. Today, Eastern European countries see themselves on the front lines against Russia. They are deeply concerned about what a broader U.S.-Russia understanding to end the fighting in Ukraine could mean for their own security. With Russia likely to consolidate control over much of eastern Ukraine, these countries must prepare for the future. Aware of Europe’s deep divisions, they are being forced to rethink their strategic options. It is thus not surprising that an unnamed senior EU official told the Financial Times: “At a certain point in time you need to decide who you would like on your team, regardless of any issues you might have. But they [Turkey] also need to sort out their ambiguity over Russia.”

What is most remarkable is Poland’s willingness to engage with Turkey on this matter. Positioned at opposite ends of Europe’s eastern periphery, the two nations compete for influence along the Black Sea’s western shores. Under normal circumstances, Warsaw would seek to lead an Intermarium coalition, bringing together the states between the Baltic, Mediterranean and Black seas. But in the current strategic environment – when Europe is scrambling to build a security framework in which the U.S. is not the driving force – Poland recognizes that such a coalition is unrealistic.

For Turkey, this moment presents a major opportunity. With a large military and a significant defense industrial base, Ankara could play a major role in a new regional security regime. However, two key obstacles stand in the way. First, although the mood may be shifting among Eastern European countries, France, Germany and Britain still have reservations about working with Turkey. Second, Turkey has a close relationship with Russia that will need to be balanced with any commitments on European security – certainly no easy task.

Turkey stands to gain far more from deeper engagement with Europe than from the Middle East. But this is not a binary choice. Both regions shape Turkish strategic planning in distinct ways. Ankara must navigate both fronts simultaneously while managing a shifting domestic landscape, where Erdogan faces mounting opposition amid a sluggish economy and high inflation.

===========

Interesting intellectual exercise to compare this to the piece that opened this thread in 2007.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 74358
    • View Profile
GPF: Erdogan's opponent detained
« Reply #361 on: March 19, 2025, 10:00:22 AM »


By: Geopolitical Futures

Erdogan's rival targeted. Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, of the opposition Republican People’s Party, was detained on Wednesday, just days before his party was expected to select him as its presidential candidate. His arrest was reportedly part of a corruption and terror investigation that resulted in dozens of other arrests. On Monday, his former university invalidated his degree, effectively disqualifying him from running for president. Following the news, the Istanbul governor’s office ordered a four-day ban on all demonstrations, meetings and press releases in the city, beginning Wednesday, to “maintain public order.” Access to several social media platforms, including X, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok, has also reportedly been shut down. The Turkish stock market also fell, while the country's currency hit a new low, falling to 41.1 lira against the U.S. dollar.