Author Topic: California  (Read 322730 times)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
Re: personally I don't believe this liberal would get recalled in Kalifornia
« Reply #850 on: February 08, 2021, 05:24:48 PM »
worth a try
though likely a waste of time:

https://www.westernjournal.com/young-not-stupid-newsoms-recall-election-almost-certain-happens-next/

This source says he still has about 50% approval.
https://www.ppic.org/blog/what-approval-ratings-say-about-recalling-governor-newsom/

I have to think the opponents might all show up to vote, making it a more even bet.

Remember, the choice isn't Newsom or a Trump.  They will still elect a liberal, so people who like a different liberal can vote to recall too.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #852 on: March 07, 2021, 04:23:46 PM »
Apparently someone was murdered in his home a couple blocks from where we lived until October.  There was a police chase with four arrests that entailed a neighborhood lockdown.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
replace Newsom with another liberal elitist
« Reply #853 on: March 24, 2021, 08:49:57 AM »


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #855 on: April 15, 2021, 06:21:58 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
https://twitter.com/BoardwalkVenice/status/1382347335397642240

Lawless America.  Victims can call 911 if they need protection and have a social worker come out with 3  month lead time for an appointment.

I pay more than 100% of my take home income in property taxes.  I wonder how much property tax these oceanfront "homeless camp" residents pay.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #857 on: April 15, 2021, 07:14:50 AM »
"I pay more than 100% of my take home income in property taxes.  I wonder how much property tax these oceanfront "homeless camp" residents pay."

people like us have zero representation in Federal government

Reagan was an exception
that was it as far as I can remember

Trump for me - not really

W with cut in gains tax - a bit

on the Dem side - never

 we are only looked at as a source of money for themselves
 in the end few to no Republican ever did squat for me in the realm of taxation

like Rush used to say  - the treasury is the source of their power
   

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #858 on: April 15, 2021, 07:35:02 AM »
"we are only looked at as a source of money for themselves
 in the end few to no Republican ever did squat for me in the realm of taxation
like Rush used to say  - the treasury is the source of their power"

It is even more cynical than that.  Revenues to the Treasury actually grow faster under pro-growth policies - and they don't care.  They don't really want more money to pay for all the programs; they want their own power and control over all of it, and all of us.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
WSJ: LA cootie rates from worst to best
« Reply #859 on: April 23, 2021, 04:05:32 PM »
Covid-19 Rates in Los Angeles Have Gone From Worst to Among the Best
Theories on why infections, deaths and hospitalizations have plummeted include high immunity from past spikes and a less infectious variant

Los Angeles County, home of the Santa Monica Pier, now has one of the lowest rates of infection per capita of the nation’s 10 most populous counties.


LOS ANGELES—At the start of the year here, hospitals were full, restaurants were empty, and three times more Covid-19 cases were being reported every day than in any other U.S. county.

Now Los Angeles County has one of the lowest rates of infection per capita of the nation’s 10 most populous counties. Restaurants are packed, hospitals have open beds, and researchers are studying possible reasons for one of the pandemic’s biggest turnarounds, which has occurred despite vaccination rates lower than the national average. Their theories include high immunity caused by previous spikes and a common variant in California that may be keeping out more infectious strains.

As case rates have fallen across the country in recent months, California has led the way. It now has the lowest per capita Covid infection rate in the continental U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, thanks in large part to Los Angeles County, where a quarter of the state’s 40 million people live.

About 20% of Covid tests were coming back positive in Los Angeles County in early January, with more than 15,000 new cases and 250 deaths reported most weekdays and more than 1,600 intensive care beds taken by coronavirus patients. In the past week, the positivity rate has been hovering around or below 1%. There are around 400 new cases and fewer than 50 deaths reported most days and just under 500 people are currently hospitalized with Covid-19.

“It’s a dramatic decrease,” said Barbara Ferrer, Los Angeles County’s director of public health. She said it would take months before there were definitive answers about why the Covid rates have come down so sharply, but several factors are likely at play.


Over the course of the pandemic, Los Angeles County has confirmed 1.18 million Covid-19 cases. But close to 40% of the population may have actually been infected already, said Shira Shafir, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of California, Los Angeles. That isn’t high enough for herd immunity, but may have left a large chunk of population not susceptible to the virus.

In addition, a California variant, which emerged late last year as a cause for rising infections here, may be keeping out the more dangerous U.K. variant that has driven rising infection rates in the Midwest, according to health researchers. The California variant is 20% more transmissible than the original strain of Covd-19, while the U.K. variant, is about 50% more transmissible, according to the CDC.


Vaccinations are spreading fast but lag the national average. Just over 37% of Los Angeles County residents 16 or older received at least one dose as of April 9. According to the latest data from the CDC, 51.5% of all American adults have received at least one dose


“You have fewer susceptible people, more people getting vaccinated, and we’re still holding steady on our safety requirements,” Dr. Ferrer said.

Unlike states that reopened their economies entirely last month, such as Texas and Arizona, California has been slow to relax regulations. And Los Angeles officials have chosen to keep some in place even when state rules allowed them to scale back.

Restaurants were closed, even for outdoor dining, for more than two months over the winter, along with schools, gyms, museums and movie theaters. Those measures helped the county to get where it is today, Dr. Ferrer said.

In the past few weeks, Los Angeles has been one of the last major metro areas in the country to begin reopening. Public school students are returning to classrooms part-time, while restaurants, gyms and museums are welcoming limited numbers of people. In trendy neighborhoods like Echo Park, would-be diners are crowding sidewalks, waiting for an available table.

“Every day, I had to check the numbers to see if I could cover payroll or not,” Armando De La Torre, 61, who owns a small chain of taco restaurants in Los Angeles called Guisados, said of the situation a few months ago. “Now things are getting better every week.”


Hospitals—which in January were so overrun with Covid patients that hallways, waiting rooms and doorways were used to treat patients—now have more than 1,000 available beds.

But health researchers and local officials said the threat of another surge in cases will persist until at least 70% of the population is vaccinated or have some form of immunity.

“I think for right now, until we get more of the population vaccinated and approach more towards herd immunity, we always have a certain level of risk of outbreak and additional surges,” said Johnese Spisso, chief executive of the UCLA Hospital System.



Dr. Ferrer said she remained particularly concerned about low vaccination rates among Black and Latino men, 19% and 17% of whom have received at least one shot, respectively. They have also been among the groups hardest hit by Covid-19.

The public health director said she works at least once a week at a county vaccination site and often encounters people who don’t think they need to be vaccinated, either because they already had the virus or don’t believe they will get it.

“We’re not going to have herd immunity until June,” she said. “But as more people get vaccinated, we’ll be in a better position to hold our own against the virus.”

MORE ON THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile





G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
I'd probably feel bad...
« Reply #868 on: July 15, 2021, 10:22:36 PM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
Re: California Governor Recall
« Reply #872 on: August 05, 2021, 08:43:35 AM »
When does Gov Larry Elder get his own thread?   ) ) )
For him to have a serious podium will affect way more than California!

KABC poll, 51% Remove - 40% Don't.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2021/governor/ca/2021-california-governor-recall-election-7360.html

Sean Trende of RCP looks at both sides of it (before that poll changed everything).  Concludes Gov. Larry is a real possibility:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/08/05/could_newsom_actually_be_recalled_146197.html

They mail a ballot to everyone (and then some).  Dems greatly outnumber R's.  More energy is presumed to be on the remove side.  How excited can you get about keeping Newsome?

I would add, the 35-40% of Californians who lean Republican would be one hell of a state in themselves, enough people to win an election in any other state.  They must be more than a little bit frustrated being ruled by the Left.

Here's your new Gov:
https://issuesinsights.com/2021/08/04/the-governor-california-voters-dont-deserve-but-surely-need/



More conservative than Trump but hard to label a white nationalist.

I sent him $100 the day he announced.  electElder.com
« Last Edit: August 05, 2021, 08:46:55 AM by DougMacG »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: California Governor Recall
« Reply #873 on: August 05, 2021, 10:35:23 AM »
Mail in voting=Newsome wins.

When does Gov Larry Elder get his own thread?   ) ) )
For him to have a serious podium will affect way more than California!

KABC poll, 51% Remove - 40% Don't.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2021/governor/ca/2021-california-governor-recall-election-7360.html

Sean Trende of RCP looks at both sides of it (before that poll changed everything).  Concludes Gov. Larry is a real possibility:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/08/05/could_newsom_actually_be_recalled_146197.html

They mail a ballot to everyone (and then some).  Dems greatly outnumber R's.  More energy is presumed to be on the remove side.  How excited can you get about keeping Newsome?

I would add, the 35-40% of Californians who lean Republican would be one hell of a state in themselves, enough people to win an election in any other state.  They must be more than a little bit frustrated being ruled by the Left.

Here's your new Gov:
https://issuesinsights.com/2021/08/04/the-governor-california-voters-dont-deserve-but-surely-need/



More conservative than Trump but hard to label a white nationalist.

I sent him $100 the day he announced.  electElder.com

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
Liberal Leftist elite hypocrisy governs and defends California failure
« Reply #874 on: August 29, 2021, 05:44:40 AM »
Paul Krugman's pathetic defense of Gavin Newsom
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/paul-krugmans-pathetic-defense-of-gavin-newsom

Now that the Left is causing it, income inequality doesn't matter, high GDP matters.  Author calls out the hypocrisy and failure of the Paul Krugman Left arguments.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2021, 05:46:16 AM by DougMacG »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
I laughed really hard at this
« Reply #875 on: September 18, 2021, 08:57:12 AM »
https://babylonbee.com/news/desperate-californians-cling-to-landing-gear-of-last-jet-leaving-lax


I recently spent a bit of time driving through VDH country (Central California). Very depressing, especially Fresno.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2021, 09:00:26 AM by G M »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #876 on: September 18, 2021, 05:26:52 PM »
GM
you post the most busting out loud videos
 :-D


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: ET: Venice Beach
« Reply #878 on: November 13, 2021, 07:36:54 AM »
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/a-world-gone-mad-venice-community-wrestles-with-continuing-homeless-crisis_4101213.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2021-11-13&mktids=fabc7961f1f9d0021546a15a0dfcbe24&est=xLAnu62cqZTXzpoLPFYadcta1eXVZcqPoIIo5JOAfSZuUkrhhEZAykqVWJbk%2B3eVuwYl

I was amazed to read this:

“It’s a world gone mad,” Venice resident Deborah Keaton told The Epoch Times. “It’s our own making too. I’m a liberal, a Democrat, and we voted for these measures that decriminalize a lot of this behavior, and so there’s no repercussions for these guys.”


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
9th Circuit en banc shoots down LCMs
« Reply #880 on: December 01, 2021, 02:36:08 PM »
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Federal Appeals Court Upholds California Ban on Large High-Capacity Ammunition Magazines
By Katabella Roberts December 1, 2021 Updated: December 1, 2021 biggersmaller Print
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld California’s ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines, reversing a San Diego federal judge’s rule that it was “unconstitutional” and handing a victory to Gov. Gavin Newsom and gun-control advocates.

The California law, which was enacted in 2016, bans the possession of large-capacity magazines (LCMs) that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The law also bans the manufacture and imports of LCMs.

Share

Earn up to $11 for every friend who reads this article.
You can earn points by sharing articles to friends. With points, you can redeem for gift cards from 100+ top brands, or other benefits. Learn more
Under the law, owners of LCMs can modify them to accept ten rounds or fewer and sell their magazines to firearm dealers or remove them from the state. The law provides several exceptions to the ban on large-capacity magazines, including possession by active or retired law enforcement officers, security guards for armored vehicles, and holders of special weapons permits.

U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez in San Diego previously blocked the ban, claiming that the law is illegal because it violates the Second Amendment right of gun owners under the U.S. Constitution.

The state government, through the law, “bans an entire class of very popular hardware—firearms that are lawful under federal law and under the laws of most states and that are commonly held by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,” Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee, wrote in his 94-page ruling at the time.

A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit in August 2020 upheld District Judge Benitez’s original decision.

But an 11-member en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit of Appeals on Tuesday voted 7–4 to issue a ruling (pdf) that reverses that decision on the California law.

The court said it applied a “two-step framework to review the Second Amendment challenge, asking first whether the challenged law affects conduct protected by the Second Amendment, and if so, what level of scrutiny to apply.”

Panel members noted that the law bolstered public safety rationale in reducing gun violence and does not outlaw the weapon entirely but rather places a limit on the size of the magazine that may be used with firearms.

“The record demonstrates that the limitation interferes only minimally with the core right of self-defense, as there is no evidence that anyone ever has been unable to defend his or her home and family due to the lack of a large-capacity magazine,” the panel wrote, adding that “the limitation saves lives.”

Panelists also noted that “in the past half-century, large-capacity magazines have been used in about three-quarters of gun massacres with 10 or more deaths and in 100 percent of gun massacres with 20 or more deaths, and more than twice as many people have been killed or injured in mass shootings that involved a large-capacity magazine as compared with mass shootings that involved a smaller-capacity magazine.”

Subsequently, the Court of Appeals ruled that California’s ban “on legal possession of large-capacity magazines reasonably supported California’s effort to reduce the devastating damage wrought by mass shootings.”

Panel members added that the law, “does not, on its face, effect a taking” because “the government acquires nothing by virtue of the limitation on the capacity of magazines,” and that because LCMs owners are allowed to modify or sell their nonconforming magazines, the law also “does not deprive owners of all economic use.”

The Epoch Times has contacted District Judge Roger T. Benitez for comment.

The decision comes as a victory for Gov. Gavin Newsom and gun-control advocates.

“Weapons of war don’t belong on our streets,” Newsom wrote on Twitter on Tuesday. “This is a huge victory for the health and safety of all Californians.”

Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle & Pistol Association said in a statement, “Sadly, the court reversed CRPA’s historic wins in both the district court and before the three-judge Ninth Circuit panel that upheld the district court’s ruling,” adding that his group will appeal to the Supreme Court.

“We are truly disappointed that the Ninth Circuit en banc panel decided to go against the solid constitutional reasoning of other judges to strike down this win for gun owners,” Michel said.

“We will be appealing to the Supreme Court for a final determination because gun owners deserve to have someone fighting for them and their rights. The Second Amendment is a fundamental right, and it is time that courts stop treating that right like a second-class gift from government.”


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
Re: California
« Reply #883 on: January 18, 2022, 05:15:31 PM »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile






Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
Newsome satire
« Reply #893 on: July 10, 2022, 12:02:51 PM »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
Newsome's water plan
« Reply #895 on: August 12, 2022, 04:51:59 AM »
Newsom unveils plan to increase water supply in California

BY VALERIE RICHARDSON THE WASHINGTON TIMES

California Gov. Gavin Newsom released a plan Thursday to increase the state’s water supply, calling for more storage, recycling and desalination plants to help the state adapt to a “hotter, drier future.”

Standing outside a desalination project in Antioch, the governor outlined strategies in a 16-page document focused on accelerating infrastructure projects as opposed to hiking conservation targets, saying that he wants to tackle the issue “not just from a scarcity mindset.”

“I think so much of the ... conversation here in the state has been about conservation, scarcity, but that’s a relatively small component of the strategy we are introducing today,” Mr. Newsom said at a press conference . “What we are focused on is creating more supply. What we are focused on is creating more water.”

In its release, the governor’s office warned that “extreme weather patterns caused by climate change” could cause the state to lose up to 10% of its water supply by 2040, but that the proposed actions could add enough water to cover 8.4 million households by 2040.

The document, “California’s Water Supply Strategy,” called for creating storage space for up to 4 million acre-feet of water by expanding and creating groundwater and reservoir capacity, as well as speeding up dam repairs; recycling and reusing 800,000 acre-feet of water annually by 2030; saving 500,000 acre-feet through conservation, and desalinating ocean and salty waters.

“These actions are identified broadly in the Newsom Administration’s Water Resilience Portfolio — the state’s master plan for water released in 2020 — but they will be expedited given the urgency of climate-driven changes,” said the governor’s office.

The Democratic governor also took a page from the Republican playbook by taking a shot at the environmental regulations that delay infrastructure projects, saying he would bulldoze through the “regulatory thickets” and fast-track the agenda through executive orders and legislative efforts.

“The time to get these damn projects is ridiculous. It’s absurd. It’s reasonably comedic,” Mr. Newsom said. “And in so many ways, the world we invented from an environmental perspective is getting in the way in moving these projects forward so we can address the acuities of Mother Nature. Permits that take years and years and years.”

From reducing regulations to building reservoirs, there was plenty in his plan to raise the hackles of the state’s powerful environmental movement, but Mr. Newsom stressed that the state needs to get away from the constant focus on scarcity.

“We’ve got to get away from that mindset,” he said. “There’s a lot more abundance out there if we’re more creative in terms of how we approach things.”

The biggest-ticket item was $27 billion by 2040 to reach the plan’s targets for recycling wastewater into drinking water. Much of the rest of the strategy would be funded by billions already earmarked by the state legislature, as well as $7.2 billion from Proposition 1, the 2014 state water bond, for seven projects.

The state is now stuck in a third straight year of drought, but Mr. Newsom has resisted state conservation mandates

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18126
    • View Profile
Re: Newsome's water plan, it's about damn time
« Reply #896 on: August 12, 2022, 06:02:06 AM »
Um,  the man has been in high office in the governing party,  mayor,  Lt.  Gov or Governor, since 2004.

Newsom: "The time to get these damn projects is ridiculous. It’s absurd. It’s reasonably comedic,” Mr. Newsom said. “And in so many ways, the world we invented from an environmental perspective is getting in the way in moving these projects forward so we can address the acuities of Mother Nature. Permits that take years and years and years.”

Weren't these reforms on the ballot every year since Pete Wilson?  Sounds like state government, federal government and voters supporting bureaucratic government are the problems more than climate variations. Reading just this part I thought maybe he was resigning, switching parties  or supporting for Larry Elder or Lanhee Chen for Governor.

At the rate people are moving away,  maybe the problem will solve itself by 2040.

But good that he finally wants to do something about it.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 06:42:42 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18353
    • View Profile
Democrats bill for fast food workers
« Reply #897 on: August 30, 2022, 10:06:41 AM »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-lawmakers-approve-landmark-fast-231247792.html

their latest voting block

to protect against the evil capitalists .....

expand unions
and more legal work for the shysters involved


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69122
    • View Profile
Newsome signs package of aggro Green Leap Forward Laws
« Reply #898 on: September 18, 2022, 08:29:22 AM »
California Governor Signs ‘Most Aggressive’ Package of Green Laws
By Caden Pearson September 17, 2022 Updated: September 17, 2022biggersmaller Print


California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday announced a sweeping package of what he called the country’s “most aggressive” climate measures to “accelerate the state’s transition” to non-conventional energy sources.

The package includes 40 bills that appear to provide new green rules on laws related to things ranging from large-scale industry to the family home and private and public transportation.

The Democratic governor’s office said in a statement the package of climate change-focused measures aims to cut pollution and target “big polluters.”

It comes as America’s most populous state has struggled to provide stable electricity for residents amid a heat wave, which saw the state asking residents to use less power and suggest the best times to use air conditioners or charge electric cars.

“This month has been a wake-up call for all of us that later is too late to act on climate change. California isn’t waiting any more,” Newsom said in a statement. “Together with the Legislature, California is taking the most aggressive action on climate our nation has ever seen.”

“We’re cleaning the air we breathe, holding the big polluters accountable, and ushering in a new era for clean energy,” he continued. “That’s climate action done the California Way—and we’re not only doubling down, we’re just getting started.”

In July, Newsom called for “bold actions” to combat climate change. He declared his climate-focused vision for California involves a push to achieve 90 percent “clean energy” by 2035, “carbon neutrality” by 2045, “setback measures” to target oil drilling, carbon capture programs, and to “advance nature-based solutions” to remove carbon from “natural and working lands.”

40 Green Bills
Newsom’s office said his sweeping package of measures will create four million new jobs over the next 20 years, cut air pollution by 60 percent, and reduce state oil consumption by 91 percent.

How this would be achieved was not explained in the governor’s news release.


The package of measures, the governor’s office said, will save the state $23 billion by avoiding damage from pollution. It further aims to cut fossil fuel use in buildings and transportation by 92 percent and refinery pollution by 94 percent.

The governor named a list of the 40 new green bills, which touch on things from the broad scope of the climate to more everyday matters such as community air quality, electricity supply, vehicle permits, and gas pricing.

Some of the bills, which were all named in the governor’s news release, include:

AB 1279: “The California Climate Crisis Act”
AB 1389: “Clean Transportation Program: project funding preferences”
AB 1749: “Community emissions reduction programs: toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutants”
AB 1857: “Solid waste”
AB 1909: “Vehicles: bicycle omnibus bill”
AB 2075: “Energy: electric vehicle charging standards”
AB 2622: “Sales and use taxes: exemptions: California Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project: transit buses”
AB 2836: “Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program: vehicle registration fees: California tire fee”
SB 529: “Electricity: electrical transmission facilities”
SB 1063: “Energy: appliance standards and cost-effective measures”
SB 1205: “Water rights: appropriation”
SB 1230: “Zero-emission and near-zero-emission vehicle incentive programs: requirements”
SB 1322: “Energy: petroleum pricing”
SB 1382: “Air pollution: Clean Cars 4 All Program: Sales and Use Tax Law: zero emissions vehicle exemption”
How the package of new green laws and regulations might impact, for example, standards required for cars to be permitted on Californian roads; how and when homes can be cooled; the source of electricity allowed to be supplied to homes; the manufacturing of everyday appliances and products, etc., were not outlined in the governor’s news release.

This latest pronouncement comes on the heels of Newsom enacting regulation to phase out sales of new gas-powered cars by 2035