Author Topic: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family  (Read 108188 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile

ya

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #501 on: April 12, 2023, 05:47:17 PM »
Biden brushes aside  Rishi Sunak, to shake hands with military guy. make your own conclusions

https://twitter.com/i/status/1646250972686045189

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
China's unsubtle threat to Biden by revealing Hunter's bank records
« Reply #502 on: April 13, 2023, 06:36:07 AM »

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/apr/12/china-sent-not-so-subtle-threat-joe-biden-revealin/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=subscriber&utm_campaign=newsalert&utm_content=newsalert&utm_term=newsalert&bt_ee=ZDgLmrjpV4ep0vN6gE7kzr1cNyG0hFYFSJB4C5hl1yh3%2FXGa5dNd6F0Q2Q5ztAS1&bt_ts=1681389470704

China sent not-so-subtle threat to Joe Biden by revealing Hunter’s bank records, says senator

By Susan Ferrechio - The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 12, 2023

China fired a warning shot at President Biden when a Chinese-American bank supplied Senate Republicans with records showing millions of dollars flowing from Chinese companies to Mr. Biden’s son Hunter Biden and brother James Biden, said a lawmaker spearheading an investigation of the first family.

Cathay Bank, which is based in Los Angeles but has offices in China, voluntarily turned over bank records requested by Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Charles E. Grassley of Iowa. Every other American bank denied the two Republicans’ requests for financial records.

“In my mind, it’s the Chinese government telling Joe Biden, ‘We got the goods on you, buddy, and we’re willing to dish it up,’” Mr. Johnson told The Washington Times.

Cathay Bank spokesman Ian Campbell said the allegations are false.

“Cathay Bank, a NASDAQ-listed, U.S. financial institution for over 60 years, has cooperated with the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability’s request for information. The bank intends to continue to cooperate with the committee,” he said in a statement to The Times. “Cathay Bank was founded more than sixty years ago by a United States citizen, and serves American communities as a bank with over $20 billion in assets and more than 60 branches in 9 states. Cathay Bank is neither owned by nor affiliated with the Chinese government in any way.”

The records the bank handed over showed deep financial ties between the president’s son and brother and the now-defunct CEFC China Energy, which had ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The energy giant wired $1 million to Hudson West III, a joint venture owned by Hunter Biden and Gongwen Dong, a business associate of CEFC’s founder and chairman, Ye Jianming.

A second Chinese energy company, Northern International Capital Holdings, which is associated with the communist-backed CEFC, wired $5 million to Hudson West III, the Cathay Bank records show. The money sent from the two companies funded a $4.8 million wire transfer from Hudson West III to Hunter Biden’s companies Owasco P.C. and Owasco LLC, and Lion Hall Group, owned by the president’s brother James Biden.

The Cathay records show Owasco P.C. sent 20 wire transfers totaling nearly $1.4 million to the Lion Hall Group. Hudson West III paid Hunter Biden a $500,000 retainer fee plus $100,000 per month. James Biden was paid $65,000 per month.

The transactions were made from August 2017 through October 2018, after Mr. Biden left the Obama White House. At that time, Mr. Biden was considered a top contender for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

“This is $5 million from a company connected to Ye Jianming and CEFC and its affiliates, which are essentially arms of the communist Chinese regime,” Mr. Grassley said during a Senate floor speech.

The Cathay Bank records provide a detailed look at just one segment of the Biden family foreign business network, which has yielded millions of dollars from deals with Russia, Ukraine and other countries that date back to Mr. Biden’s term as vice president.

Mr. Biden has denied having any involvement with or knowledge about his family’s business entanglements, but House and Senate Republicans are investigating potential influence peddling and how the transactions might pose threats to national security.

They said the Chinese business deals and Cathay Bank’s willingness to make them public raise red flags about Mr. Biden’s involvement and vulnerability.

“We just requested the records, and no questions asked; they just turned them over to us,” Mr. Johnson said. “That’s not by accident.”

The bank records reveal that Hunter Biden and Gongwen Dong opened a $99,000 line of credit for Hunter Biden to use, along with James Biden and his wife, Sara Biden. The credit cards were used to make purchases from airlines, Apple stores, hotels and restaurants, according to an investigative report by Mr. Johnson and Mr. Grassley.

The bank records showed other payments from Hudson West III. The company sent CEFC Infrastructure, an affiliate of CEFC Energy, payments totaling more than $381,000. Gongwen Dong received roughly $123,000, and Hunter Biden’s Chinese American assistant, JiaQi Bao, was paid nearly $30,000. Coldharbour Capital LLC, a company associated with Hunter Biden’s business partner Mervyn Yan, received $318,000.

Republicans said the business deals could be softening the president’s stance against China’s creeping threats to the U.S.

Mr. Johnson pointed to the Justice Department’s decision in February 2022 to disband the China Initiative. The program was implemented under President Trump to combat China’s efforts to steal cutting-edge technology and other U.S. innovations. The Justice Department said it dropped the program because of concerns from civil rights groups.

Mr. Biden also suspended tariffs on Chinese solar panels.

The president’s supporters say he has been tough on China and point to his decision to limit the export of some semiconductor chips, which are critical to national security.

Republicans want the Cathay Bank records to be included in an ongoing investigation of Hunter Biden’s tax filings.

Mr. Johnson and Mr. Grassley sent the bank records to U.S. Attorney David Weiss, Delaware’s top prosecutor. Mr. Weiss oversees a team investigating Hunter Biden on suspicion of tax crimes and false statements regarding a gun purchase.

“If you are conducting a full and complete investigation, you should already possess these records,” Mr. Johnson and Mr. Grassley wrote to Mr. Weiss in October. “In the case that you are not and do not possess these records, we suggest that you review them in detail.”

House Republicans, meanwhile, are following a trail of suspicious activity reports at the Treasury Department to gain access to bank accounts related to the Biden business deals that other financial institutions have declined to provide voluntarily.

Republicans hold the House majority, which gives the Oversight and Accountability Committee greater access to Treasury Department records and the power to subpoena bank records.

The committee chairman, Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, began seeking bank records nearly a year ago. He wrote to Cathay Bank President Chang M. Liu, “The American people deserve to know the president’s connections to his son’s business deals, which have occurred at the expense of American interests and may represent a national security threat.”

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #503 on: April 13, 2023, 10:53:29 AM »
second

MAN WHO WROTE DOWN BIDEN’S EVERY WORD SAYS HE DEFINITELY KNEW ABOUT BURISMA… Joe Biden ‘Knew’ Hunter Was On Burisma Board While Pushing For Natural Gas In Ukraine, Former Obama Stenographer Says (VIDEO)

A former stenographer who worked for the Obama administration said Wednesday that then-Vice President Joe Biden “knew” his son Hunter was on the board of directors for Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company, while embarking on a trip to the country in an effort to bolster its natural gas industry.

“What happened on that trip was, Joe Biden was in the front of the plane. My job as the White House stenographer was to be in the back of the plane in the press cabin and if Joe or a senior administration official came back and did a briefing, then I would record it and make a transcript. Well, that’s exactly what happened,” Mike McCormick told Fox News host Jesse Watters. “That senior administration official was Jake Sullivan who is now our national security adviser. So, I didn’t see anything wrong with it at the time.”

Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of Burisma in 2014, stepping down in 2019 when his father launched his 2020 presidential campaign. Biden boasted of getting a prosecutor investigating allegations of the corruption within the company fired during a 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations.

McCormick said that he witnessed now-National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, explaining to members of the press on the trip how the United States would assist Ukraine in developing its natural gas industry, according to the New York Post.



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
Hunter Lawyers to meet DOJ's David Weiss
« Reply #507 on: April 23, 2023, 04:30:31 PM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/04/23/hunter-bidens-lawyers-to-meet-prosecutor-weiss-as-special-counsel-remains-unnamed-by-garland/

a flicker of good news here :

https://www.justice.gov/usao-de/meet-us-attorney

David Weiss appointed to be District
Attorney of Delaware by. -------   DJT !

So maybe just maybe Garland can't easily shyster his way out of this.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #508 on: April 25, 2023, 07:05:39 AM »
My suspicion is that tax charges against Hunter will be used as a shiny object to distract from his father, who after the election will pardon him.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
Turley : plea deal may be Hunter's best option
« Reply #510 on: April 30, 2023, 02:26:43 PM »
we here all know how this is going to turn out ;  a slap on the wrist by Garland's DOJ

and cover for the Joe:

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3978970-hunters-collapsing-world-why-a-criminal-plea-could-now-be-the-best-option-for-the-bidens/

rule of law






Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
NRO: Web of shell companies for Biden Crime Family
« Reply #516 on: May 10, 2023, 07:00:16 PM »
Bidens Used Web of Shell Companies to Conceal Foreign Cash, Bank Records Obtained by House GOP Reveal
House Committee on Oversight Chairman James Comer and fellow Oversight Committee Republicans hold a press conference to discuss their investigation into the business dealings of President Joe Biden's family members at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
By BRITTANY BERNSTEIN

May 10, 2023 9:51 AM
The Biden family and its business associates created a complicated web of more than 20 companies, according to bank records obtained by the House Oversight Committee — a system, GOP lawmakers say, that was meant to conceal money received from foreign nationals.

Sixteen of the companies were limited liability companies formed during Joe Biden’s tenure as vice president, the committee said in a press conference on Wednesday. The Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received more than $10 million from foreign nationals’ and their related companies, the records show. These payments occurred both while Biden was in office as vice president and after his time in office ended.


In what Representative Nancy Mace called an act of “financial gymnastics,” many payments were routed from foreign companies to the Biden family’s business associates’ companies which then doled out payments to the Bidens in incremental payments to different bank accounts in an alleged attempt to hide the source of the funds.

At least nine Biden family members received payments, according to committee chairman James Comer. That includes Hunter Biden; James Biden; James Biden’s wife, Sara Jones Biden; the late Beau Biden’s wife, Hallie Biden; Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle; Hunter Biden’s wife, Melissa Cohen; and “three children of the president’s son and the president’s brother.”

Much of the money came from Chinese nationals and companies with ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Multiple Biden family members received money after it passed through an associate’s account. Comer said of the countries the Biden family was influence peddling in, China is “the most reputable.”

The committee revealed Wednesday that records suggest the Biden family and its associates’ business dealings in Romania “bear clear indication of a scheme to peddle influence” from 2015 to 2017.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Pravda on the Hudson on the $$$ to the Bidens
« Reply #517 on: May 11, 2023, 04:31:02 AM »
House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden
After months of investigation and many public accusations of corruption against Mr. Biden and his family, the first report of the premier House G.O.P. inquiry showed no proof of such misconduct.

Give this article


James R. Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, stands behind a lectern and speaks alongside the Republican members of the committee.
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee released their first report on an investigation into President Biden and his family on Wednesday.Credit...Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

Luke Broadwater
By Luke Broadwater
Reporting from Washington

May 10, 2023
After four months of investigation, House Republicans who promised to use their new majority to unearth evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden acknowledged on Wednesday that they had yet to uncover incriminating material about him, despite their frequent insinuations that he and his family have been involved in criminal conduct and corruption.

At a much-publicized news conference on Capitol Hill to show the preliminary findings of their premier investigation into Mr. Biden and his family, leading Republicans released financial documents detailing how some of the president’s relatives were paid more than $10 million from foreign sources between 2015 and 2017.

Republicans described the transactions as proof of “influence peddling” by Mr. Biden’s family, including his son Hunter Biden, and referenced some previously known, if unflattering, details of the younger Mr. Biden’s business dealings. Those included an episode in which he accepted a 2.8-carat diamond from a Chinese businessman. G.O.P. lawmakers also produced material suggesting that President Biden and his allies had at times made misleading statements in their efforts to push back aggressively against accusations of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden.

But on Wednesday, the Republicans conceded that they had yet to find evidence of a specific corrupt action Mr. Biden took in office in connection with any of the business deals his son entered into. Instead, their presentation underscored how little headway top G.O.P. lawmakers have made in finding clear evidence of questionable transactions they can tie to Mr. Biden, their chief political rival.

It has not stopped them from accusing the president of serious misconduct.

“I want to be clear: This committee is investigating President Biden and his family’s shady business dealings to capitalize on Joe Biden’s public office that risks our country’s national security,” said Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky and the chairman of the Oversight Committee. He emphasized that the president — not just his son — would be the target of his investigation, which he said would now “enter a new phase,” in which he would subpoena specific financial information based on material learned through bank records.

Federal prosecutors have examined Hunter Biden’s international business activities as part of a criminal investigation. But the only charges they are considering, according to people familiar with the case, are unrelated to his work abroad. They include tax charges related to his failure to file his tax returns over several years, and a charge of lying about his drug use on a federal form he filled out to purchase a handgun.

Dig deeper into the moment.
Special offer: Subscribe for $1 a week for the first year.
To date, Mr. Comer’s committee has issued four bank subpoenas, obtained thousands of financial records and spoken with several people he describes as whistle-blowers. Mr. Comer has also hired James Mandolfo, a former federal prosecutor who has experience investigating foreign corruption, to oversee the inquiry.

Here’s what we know so far.

Editors’ Picks

An Illustrator’s Paris Apartment That Couldn’t Be More Parisian

Yotam Ottolenghi Celebrates Spring With Asparagus

TV’s War With the Robots Is Already Here
Image
Abbe Lowell looks at his watch while standing atop a set of stairs outside of a courthouse.
Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, said the report revealed nothing new.Credit...Getty Images

Businesses connected to Hunter Biden received more than $10 million from foreign companies, some with criminal ties.
The House Oversight Committee report focused on payments made to companies connected to Hunter Biden from businesses and individuals in Romania and China. Bank records obtained by the committee show the receipt of money from a foreign company connected to Gabriel Popoviciu, who was the subject of a criminal investigation and prosecution for corruption in Romania.

In 2015, Mr. Popoviciu retained Hunter Biden, who is a lawyer, while his father was vice president, to help try to fend off charges. That effort was unsuccessful and, in 2016, Mr. Popoviciu was convicted on charges related to a land deal in northern Bucharest, the Romanian capital.

The Biden Presidency
Immigration Policies: Surges of migrants have shaped President Biden’s policies at the border in ways that few of his allies imagined when he was running for president.
William Burns: The C.I.A. director, a key figure in bolstering the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine, has amassed influence that goes well beyond that of most previous spy chiefs.
Neera Tanden: Biden’s staff secretary will serve as the director of the Domestic Policy Council, replacing Susan Rice in the role.
2024 Presidential Race: The president, who formally announced that he would seek a second term, has downplayed concerns over his age, saying he has a “job to finish” in bolstering the economy and reasserting U.S. leadership abroad.
Mr. Comer has also focused on John R. Walker, an associate of Hunter Biden who was involved in a joint venture with executives of CEFC China Energy, a now-bankrupt Chinese conglomerate.

A Shanghai-based company, State Energy HK Limited, that was affiliated with CEFC China Energy sent millions to Robinson Walker LLC, a company associated with Mr. Walker, who then made payments to Hunter Biden and other Biden family members.

Hunter Biden had cultivated a business relationship with Ye Jianming, the founder of CEFC, who has been investigated by the Chinese authorities on suspicion of economic crimes. In 2017, Mr. Ye gave Hunter Biden a 2.8-carat diamond as a thank-you for a meeting.

“What would they be bribing me for? My dad wasn’t in office,” Hunter Biden told The New Yorker in 2019, adding that he gave the diamond to his associates. “I knew it wasn’t a good idea to take it. I just felt like it was weird.”

CEFC had hoped to invest in a liquefied natural gas venture in Louisiana, but that deal ultimately flopped.

Representatives of Hunter Biden characterize his business offerings at the time as providing legal and consulting services.

The payments came at a time when Hunter Biden’s life and finances were spiraling amid his drug addiction, and after the death of his brother, Beau Biden, from brain cancer. Hunter Biden had begun a romantic relationship with his brother’s widow. His business partner, Mr. Walker, and his uncle James Biden were pursuing international business work.

Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, said in a statement that House Republicans had revealed nothing new in their report.

“Today’s so-called ‘revelations' are retread, repackaged misstatements of perfectly proper meetings and business by private citizens.” Mr. Lowell said.

President Biden has falsely denied his son had ties to Chinese businesses.
None of the payments detailed in the report went to President Biden himself, nor has Mr. Comer’s investigation produced any evidence that Mr. Biden ever took a corrupt action in connection with his son’s business dealings.

But Mr. Biden has made several false or misleading statements about the matter.

During the 2020 presidential debate, Mr. Biden claimed that no one in his family had received money from China.

“My son has not made money in terms of this thing about — what are you talking about, China,” Mr. Biden said, turning the charge on his opponent, President Donald J. Trump. “The only guy who made money from China is this guy. He’s the only one. Nobody else has made money from China.”

This year, Mr. Biden also claimed that it was “not true” that family members received more than $1 million from a Chinese firm.

Aides to Mr. Biden said he was speaking colloquially and was pushing back generally on claims that his administration had been corrupted by Chinese money.

Image
Hunter Biden greets crowds of people and shakes hands in Ireland.
The House Republicans’ report highlighted some previously known, if unflattering, details of the Hunter Biden’s business dealings.Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

Presidents’ families have long made money off the family name.
During his news conference, Mr. Comer acknowledged that Hunter Biden would have been far from the first relative of a president or vice president to try to make money off the family name.

He invoked Billy Carter, the brother of former President Jimmy Carter, who visited Libya and received a $220,000 loan; and Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law whose firm has received hundreds of millions from Persian Gulf nations.

“This has been a pattern for a long time,” Mr. Comer said. “Republicans and Democrats have both complained about presidents’ families receiving money.”

However, Mr. Comer has conceded that he has no interest in investigating Mr. Kushner’s conduct.

Officials allied with Mr. Biden played a role in wrongly discrediting Hunter Biden’s laptop.
The report from Mr. Comer came as a second Republican-led House committee is investigating a related issue. The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday released a report about a letter from 51 former intelligence and security officials in 2020 that questioned materials — substantial portions of which were later verified as authentic — from a laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a Delaware repair shop and suggested they might be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

The Republicans argue that the letter influenced the public to discount the materials on the laptop, which contained evidence of Hunter Biden’s drug use and sex life, which they believed would harm his father’s electoral chances against Mr. Trump.

The Judiciary Committee report detailed the role played by Antony J. Blinken, now the secretary of state and then a Biden campaign official, in spearheading the letter, and said a C.I.A. employee had been involved in soliciting at least one signature for it.

The intelligence officials maintain their letter stated they had no evidence of a Russian disinformation campaign, and that they were merely stating an opinion.

Mark Zaid, a lawyer who represents seven signatories to the letter, said on Twitter that the report merely proved that “private citizens lawfully exercised 1st Amendment rights” and added that there was not “even one falsehood” in the letter.

“I know of no signatory who retracts a single word,” Mr. Zaid wrote.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #518 on: May 11, 2023, 05:24:45 AM »
I was watching newsnation for short time
and it was being discussed

that ties to "big guy" Biden are not iron clad.
actually the report is basically a disappointment.

hopefully will not be as bogus as the "kraken" with all sorts of claims that do not prove Joe was taking money for favors


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #519 on: May 11, 2023, 06:18:35 AM »
It doesn't matter. Nothing will be done.


I was watching newsnation for short time
and it was being discussed

that ties to "big guy" Biden are not iron clad.
actually the report is basically a disappointment.

hopefully will not be as bogus as the "kraken" with all sorts of claims that do not prove Joe was taking money for favors

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Evidence so weak, the FBI is keeping it from from congress
« Reply #520 on: May 11, 2023, 07:31:39 AM »
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/breaking-fbi-hiding-key-document-detailing-bribery-scheme-involving-joe-biden-and-foreign-national/

It doesn't matter. Nothing will be done.


I was watching newsnation for short time
and it was being discussed

that ties to "big guy" Biden are not iron clad.
actually the report is basically a disappointment.

hopefully will not be as bogus as the "kraken" with all sorts of claims that do not prove Joe was taking money for favors

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Evidence so weak, the FBI is keeping it from from congress
« Reply #521 on: May 12, 2023, 07:36:34 AM »
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-smell-of-goose-cooking/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/breaking-fbi-hiding-key-document-detailing-bribery-scheme-involving-joe-biden-and-foreign-national/

It doesn't matter. Nothing will be done.


I was watching newsnation for short time
and it was being discussed

that ties to "big guy" Biden are not iron clad.
actually the report is basically a disappointment.

hopefully will not be as bogus as the "kraken" with all sorts of claims that do not prove Joe was taking money for favors


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: May 16, 2023, 06:36:05 AM by ccp »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #524 on: May 16, 2023, 07:41:02 AM »
Sometimes an article falls solidly in more than one thread and is worth being findable down the road in either thread.  This would be an example of that.  In short, no worries.  Indeed it can be proper practice to purposefully post in more than one thread.  I have done this on numerous occasions.




Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
WSJ: The Biden Family Business
« Reply #528 on: May 19, 2023, 10:22:08 AM »
The Biden Family Business
A House report shows how Hunter and relatives profited while Joe was Vice President.
By The Editorial BoardFollow
May 10, 2023 6:53 pm ET


House Republicans on Wednesday released their latest report on the Biden family’s business ties, and one conclusion is that it’s good to be related to Joseph Robinette Biden. Hunter Biden and his relatives traded profitably off the Biden name with transactions that suggest the main family business is influence peddling.


House Oversight Chair James Comer’s staff report shows in detail that Hunter had extensive dealings with unsavory foreign actors. This yielded millions of dollars for Biden family members via a web of shell companies that would be hard to untangle without subpoena power. Why so much complexity?

The 36-page report shows Biden family members and business associates created nearly 20 separate entities shortly before and during Joe Biden’s Vice Presidency. The entities with obscure names—Hudson West III, Hudson West V, Owascu, JBB SR INC—transferred cash from foreign entities. Bank records show that more than $10 million was delivered to Biden family members, associates and companies from these foreign entities, and in curious ways.

In some cases “Biden associates would receive significant deposits from foreign sources,” then “transfer smaller, incremental payments to Biden bank accounts,” the report says. These “complicated and seemingly unnecessary” transactions appeared to be an “effort to conceal the source and total amount received from the foreign companies.”


Some payments came from such shady characters as Chinese national Ye Jianming, his associates, and his company CEFC. Mr. Ye had a background in Chinese military intelligence and used CEFC to promote President Xi Jinping’s agenda globally. One of Mr. Ye’s deputies, Patrick Ho, was convicted in the U.S. in 2018 on international bribery and money laundering.

Mr. Ye’s emissary to the U.S., Gongwen Dong, in 2017 established a corporate entity with Hunter—each with 50% ownership. Over 14 months the entity dispersed more than $4 million to Hunter-related companies and another $75,000 to companies related to the President’s brother, James Biden. Mr. Dong used a separate set of complex corporate entities and transfers to send Hunter another $100,000 payment.

In 2017 another Ye-related company—State Energy HK—paid some $3 million to Hunter’s business associates. At least $1 million was then funneled in 16 separate payments over three months to five different bank accounts, all related to the Biden name. They included companies associated with Hunter and James Biden, an unknown bank account identified simply as “Biden” and a payment to Hallie Biden—the widow of Hunter’s deceased brother Beau and later Hunter’s girlfriend.

The report lays out a similarly complex web of payments to Hunter and associates from an entity that appears to be connected to a Romanian businessman who has been convicted of bribery. In total, Mr. Comer says the committee has identified at least nine Biden family members that received foreign income, including Hunter, James, James’s wife Sara, Hallie, Hunter’s ex-wife (Kathleen Buhle), Hunter’s current wife (Melissa Cohen), and three children or grandchildren of Joe or James.

***
The Bidens have a right to make a living, but one important question is what Hunter did to earn these payments. Hunter’s spokespersons aren’t saying, and his attorney scorned the Comer report as “repackaged misstatements of perfectly proper meetings and business by private citizens.” But a fair conclusion is that these foreigners were buying influence with a powerful family.

Emails and text messages made public in 2020 by former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski—related to a separate attempted deal with CEFC—quote Hunter demanding more because CEFC is “coming to be MY partner to be partners with the Bidens,” and noting that “I’m the only one putting an entire family legacy on the line.” In another email reported by the New York Post, Hunter boasted that Mr. Ye would pay him millions for “introductions alone.”

The press is mostly dismissing the report because it reveals no evidence that President Biden received any money. But the committee has already exposed that Joe Biden dissembled in 2020 when he claimed that “my son has not made money in terms of this thing about—what are you talking about—China. I have not had it. The only guy that made money from China is this guy,” referring to Donald Trump. Mr. Comer isn’t done, and we shall see where the money trail leads.

The report shows the Biden family profiting from Joe Biden’s political power. Payments from Chinese nationals are also a familiar way that the Communist Party has tried to compromise America’s political class. There may not be a smoking gun, but there’s plenty of suspicious smoke worth investigating.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Makes the point but finishes quite timidly
« Reply #529 on: May 19, 2023, 10:28:21 AM »
The Biden Family Business

Then-vice president Joe Biden speaks as his son Hunter Biden looks on at the World Food Program USA's Annual McGovern-Dole Leadership Award Ceremony in Washington, D.C., April 12, 2016.(Paul Morigi/Getty Images for World Food Program USA)
Share
537 Comments
Listen to article
By THE EDITORS
May 17, 2023 6:30 AM
On May 21, 2014, then–Vice President Joe Biden, in his role as Obama administration point-man for American policy with respect to several countries, including Romania, delivered a speech in Bucharest, admonishing the prime minister and other Romanian officials that “corruption is a cancer.” He warned that allowing public corruption to fester “can represent a clear and present danger not only to a nation’s economy, but to its very national security.”

Investigations currently being pressed by House Republicans raise worrisome indications that Biden may have failed to heed his own advice.

That is the upshot of a 36-page interim report issued by the House Oversight Committee led by Chairman James Comer (R., Ky.). Thanks to Biden administration stonewalling, the committee’s probe is still at an early stage. In the president’s first two years, for example, Treasury Department practices were altered to deny the GOP minority access to over 150 Suspicious Activity Reports filed by banks in connection with Biden family transactions. Until Republicans took control of the House and its subpoena power in January, House GOP efforts stalled, with investigators left to rely on the yeoman’s work of Senators Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R., Wis.), relying on information derived from Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop and whistleblowers.

Still, as the interim report details, after a perusal of just a fraction of the relevant data, his family members and their associates have hauled in over $10 million from foreign nationals and their related companies since Biden’s days as Obama administration vice president. These include Gabriel Popoviciu, a businessman convicted of bribery in Romania and relatedly investigated by British authorities. He poured over $1 million into Biden family accounts even as the then–vice president lectured Bucharest about corruption.

The Romanian payments to the Bidens fit a disturbing pattern replicated in Ukraine, China, and elsewhere. The source of the funds was a corrupt foreigner, in some cases likely a tool of a foreign state. Vast sums of money were first transferred from a company controlled by the source to a corporate shell controlled by a Biden crony, such as James Gilliar or, in the Romanian transactions, Robinson Walker. Over time, and after taking a cut, the crony would transfer funds to accounts controlled by Biden family members.

Often, those family members were the now-president’s famously erratic son Hunter and Joe’s brother, Jim, a consultant-of-all-trades. House investigators have identified as many as nine Bidens on the receiving end of money transfers, including minor children and such figures as Hallie Biden (a school counselor, who is the widow of the president’s late son Beau and was later the paramour of Hunter), who can have performed no conceivable services in exchange for these payments. Given the pattern of how public corruption works around the globe, the people making the payments must have expected that they were investing in official favor.

That is the most alarming fact in the pattern. It is easy to see large sums of foreign-source money coming the Bidens’ way. The bank records don’t lie. What’s not apparent is any legitimate value received in exchange. There are no obvious assets, commodities, or services as one would expect to find when legitimate transfers of exorbitant sums are exchanged in business transactions. The only apparent item of value is potential access to Joe Biden and his influence over American policy.

As a result, the payments resemble what investigators frequently find in examining criminal enterprises: conspirators forever grappling with the challenge of concealing where the money is coming from, how much of it there is, and who is getting it. By receiving big foreign payments — such as millions from Popoviciu and entities closely connected to the Xi regime and the Chinese Communist Party — the Biden cronies conceal the source from view. Meantime, the Biden family used at least 20 corporate shells — mainly limited liability companies (LLCs), 15 of which Hunter Biden set up while his father was vice president. These entities establish bank accounts. With the use of numerous accounts, the big payments are divided and staggered into smaller, less conspicuous transfers doled out over time. The labyrinthine structure and payout complexities — the kind you don’t tend to see in even big-dollar transactions that are on the up and up — raise colorable suspicion of money laundering.

Of course, whether criminal laws have been violated is a second-order issue. As then–Vice President Biden told the Romanians, public corruption can become a profound national-security problem. The question is what shady foreigners and corrupt regimes, some of them hostile to the United States, believe they were buying.

It has long been known that the Biden family did its most lucrative wheeler-dealing with China. In just the year between 2017 and 2018, the Bidens received $6 million from CEFC, a Chinese conglomerate — or, better, an agent of China dressed up as a conglomerate. Again, there was no apparent exchange of value other than potential access to Joe Biden — unless you count the $1 million paid to Hunter to serve as a defense lawyer (not his area of legal practice) to represent Patrick Ho, whom he famously referred to in a laptop recording as the “f***ing spy chief of China.” When the Justice Department prosecuted and convicted Ho for foreign corruption, it disclosed that there had been relevant national-security surveillance under FISA. Not long after that, China apprehended Hunter’s main CEFC partner, Ye Jianming, formerly a globally renowned tycoon and Xi protégé but one who has not been seen publicly since.

CEFC bore all the classic earmarks of a Chinese influence operation.

Predictably, the media–Democratic complex is doing its best to bury the House Republican findings. They deserve more attention and further investigation.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Judicial Watch continues fighting for us.
« Reply #531 on: May 27, 2023, 07:38:21 AM »
Judicial Watch Sues National Archives for Biden Family Business Records



Joe Biden is hiding his shady business dealings abroad behind his National Archives. So we’ve filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit against the agency for Biden family’s records and communications regarding travel and finance transactions, as well as communications between the Bidens and several known business associates (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives (No. 1:23-cv-01432).

We had to sue because the National Archives has yet to produce any records in response to our February 2023 FOIA request for:

Records and/or communications from former Vice President Joseph R. Biden regarding:
Any communication with Robert Hunter Biden, James Brian Biden, Francis William “Frank” Biden or Sara Jones Biden between January 20, 2009, and January 20, 2017, regarding:
a) any international or domestic travel
b) any international or domestic financial activity, including but not limited to banking and   financial institutions, overseas bank accounts, credit card companies, bills, invoices, fees, agreements, financial arrangements, payments, wire transfers, contracts, QuickBooks, financial spreadsheets, business proposals, office or residential leases, rent payments, real estate transactions

Any communication with Robert Hunter Bid en, James Brian Biden, Francis William "Frank" Biden or Sara Jones Biden between January 20, 2009, and January 20, 2017, regarding the following individuals or companies:
a) Devon Archer;
b) JiaQi Bao;
c) Tony Bobulinski;
d) Jeffrey Cooper;
e) Catherine Dodge;
f) Gongwen Dong;
g) James Gilliar;
h) Patrick Ho Chi-ping;
i) Vuk Jeremie;
j) Zang Jianjun;
k) Ye Jianming;
l) Jonathan Li;
m) Joan Mayer or Joan Peugh;
n) Francis Person;
o) Vadim Pozharskyi;
p) Eric Schwerin;
q) Robert Walker;
r) Mervyn Yan;
s) Nita Madhav;
t) Maiy Guttieri
u) Any Metabiota entity or company;
v) Any Rosemont Seneca entity or company;
w) Any Hudson West entity or company;
x) Any Owasco entity or company;
y) Any Bohai Harvest entity or company;
z) Skaneateles LLC;
aa) Eudora Global LLC;
bb) Coldharbour Capital LLC;
cc) Lion Hall Group LLC;
dd) Any CEFC entity or company; and
ee) Burisma.

Any communication, between January 20, 2009, and January 20, 2017, between or among former Vice President Joseph R. Biden and the individuals or entities set forth in Items 2(a)-(ee) above.
All records and documents including paper or electronic calendars such as (Outlook or Gmail) regarding former Vice President Joseph R. Biden and the individuals or entities set forth in Items 2(a)-(ee) above.
We explained to the court that in a March letter the National Archives acknowledged receiving the FOIA request, assigned it a case number and claimed it had identified “approximately 1,567 emails, 2,501 electronic files, and 445 pages of potentially responsive records that must be processed in order to respond to your request.”

The Archives also stated that, according to the Code of Federal Regulations, it is required to “notify representatives of the former President and the incumbent President and the former Vice President prior to the release of any Vice Presidential records.” The letter did not say when or even whether any such notice had been given or would be given. On information and belief, no such notice has been given.

On May 10, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer (R-KY.) released financial records of the Biden family’s business dealings showing that millions of dollars flowed from China and other foreign sources through a labyrinth of Biden family companies:

[The] financial records reveal the Biden family and associates’ complicated network of companies set up during Joe Biden’s vice presidency and the millions the Bidens received from foreign sources. The financial records also reveal how the Bidens used complicated transactions to hide payments from foreign nationals, including CCP-linked associates, and provide clear indications of influence-peddling schemes during then-Vice President Biden’s tenure.

Clearly, the Biden National Archives agency is stonewalling the release of thousands of records that could go to the heart of Biden family corruption allegations.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
Rep Comer and the informant on Newsmax
« Reply #532 on: June 07, 2023, 01:03:12 PM »
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/comer-wray-contempt/2023/06/07/id/1122695/

the informant from was 6/20. - while Barr was AG
and then information not followed up

of course Biden was private citizen

I am guessing Barr was too concerned to the deep state and media he would look partisan if he pursued against the Dem nominee,

Compare this to the Dems who now control DOJ....


'

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
second post ;
« Reply #533 on: June 07, 2023, 01:11:37 PM »
just saw this update on the Bong report

that Barr calls Raskin as speaking un truths

 :-o


https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/07/exclusive-bill-barr-confirms-rep-jamie-raskin-lied-about-biden-family-corruption-investigation/

I am sick of the lying shysters
nothing ever happens to them

« Last Edit: June 07, 2023, 01:36:06 PM by ccp »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
Biden health
« Reply #534 on: June 08, 2023, 08:28:27 AM »
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/President-Biden-Current-Health-Summary-November-2021.pdf

the report lists Biden as having "chronic Atrial Fibrillation "


not on rate control medicine
but NO MENTION OF BLOOD THINNERS!!!

typically people with this are ON BLOOD THINNERS to prevent catastrophic embolic stroke which statistically is ~ 5 - 8% per yr

the blood thinner will reduce the risk to I think if memory serves me to ~ 2 % per annum

the main reason to not use blood thinners
is if the risk of bleeding or other problems outweighs the benefit .

one risk would be frequent falling !
if an 82 yo would fall and hit head the risk of intracranial bleeding is much higher on blood thinners

so the risk of the blood thinner might be higher than the risk of not using it.

Dr Marc Siegal  mentioned this on Tucker about the liklihood biden is on blood thinners

though I have not heard or read a peep about this
or mention of it by Leftist doctors

but this is very important
not sure why not mentioned one way or the other


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #535 on: June 08, 2023, 11:26:07 AM »
Ummm , , , because doing so would remind the American people who is one heart beat away?


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #537 on: June 08, 2023, 03:20:38 PM »
Former AG Barr was on Martha McCallum today speaking with lawyerly precision on matters of interest to us.  GM, can you track this down for us?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #538 on: June 08, 2023, 07:33:29 PM »
Former AG Barr was on Martha McCallum today speaking with lawyerly precision on matters of interest to us.  GM, can you track this down for us?

This?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt2LMYIzN1M

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: Big Guy Biden & Son (Hunter) and family
« Reply #539 on: June 08, 2023, 10:08:15 PM »
The effort is appreciated but if I not mistaken that is from three years ago.

Laura Ingraham was in fine form tonight on the Trump indictiment with intelligent guests.  Trump's attorney, (forget his name) was very strong. 
« Last Edit: June 08, 2023, 10:17:54 PM by Crafty_Dog »



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19758
    • View Profile
no special counsel for Hunter
« Reply #542 on: June 10, 2023, 08:45:37 AM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: no special counsel for Hunter
« Reply #543 on: June 10, 2023, 09:50:53 AM »
https://nypost.com/2023/03/01/rep-jim-jordan-blasts-garlands-refusal-to-appoint-special-counsel-over-hunter-biden/

Biden classified doc special counsel:

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/13/1148934429/robert-hur-doj-special-counsel-biden-classified-documents

the SC for Biden docs only appointed ~ 6 mo ago

but nonetheless this is what we hear from that or from MSM on Hunter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpGtBnVZLSk

Hunter will be prosecuted right after Bill and Hillary.



G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
WSJ: Remember when Biden said?
« Reply #547 on: June 15, 2023, 06:24:03 AM »
Remember When Biden Said He Was Cooperating With the Classified Documents Probe?
He and his lawyers seem to be doing a good job preventing disclosure.
James Freeman hedcutBy James FreemanFollow
June 14, 2023 3:52 pm ET



Only 39% of registered voters think President Joe Biden is honest and trustworthy, according to the latest Economist/YouGov poll. So perhaps it won’t come as a great shock that Mr. Biden’s claim to be cooperating with the investigation into his mishandling of classified documents is looking like malarkey—unless one defines cooperation as avoiding discussion with investigators.

There’s no reason Mr. Biden couldn’t have opted for full and complete disclosure when the existence of classified materials improperly stored on his property came to light last year. Now the calendar is nearly halfway through 2023 and Mr. Biden is prosecuting his chief rival while also defending his own legal position. Carol Lee, Monica Alba and Michael Kosnar reported recently for NBC News:

The federal investigation into President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents shows few signs of an imminent conclusion even as the probes into former Vice President Mike Pence and former President Donald Trump have reached or appear to be reaching the end, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Biden’s advisers, for instance, have determined he would provide an interview to the special counsel investigating his handling of classified documents once Biden’s legal team and the Justice Department agree on the conditions, these people said.

Perhaps the Justice Department’s special counsel Robert Hur is a pushover, and one certainly can’t fault Mr. Biden’s attorneys for negotiating aggressively on behalf of their client. But if Mr. Biden—who claimed to be unaware of how all the documents that shouldn’t have been in his office, home and garage ended up in his office, home and garage—was sincere in claiming how seriously he took such issues, he could be much more helpful in bringing the facts to light.

Disclosing the truth really doesn’t have to take this long. In another recent NBC report Laura Jarrett noted:


Former Vice President Mike Pence will not be charged in the discovery of classified documents at his Indiana home, according to a letter obtained by NBC News.

On Thursday, the Justice Department’s national security division informed Pence’s attorney that it had closed its investigation and that based on the “results” of that probe, no charges will be filed against the former vice president. Pence was interviewed as part of the DOJ’s investigation, along with several aides, according to a source familiar with the matter.
If Mr. Biden wants to argue that he wasn’t at fault for the mishandling of documents during his Senate and vice presidential days, when is he going to reveal which of his aides were at fault?

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley writes in the Messenger that the special prosecutor, Mr. Hur, has already been on the job for six months and argues that a Biden interview should already have happened:

The question today is whether Hur has asked to speak to Biden or asked for a statement from Biden. The best time for such a demand was six months ago, before Biden might learn of countervailing evidence.

Biden has repeatedly insisted that he would fully cooperate with the investigation. That would seem like an invitation for an interview or a written statement back in January.

Both for the sake of the country and for himself, why wouldn’t Mr. Biden make it a priority to resolve this issue? Perhaps resolution would not be kind to the President. Mr. Turley writes that “what President Biden has said publicly on the matter makes no sense” and adds:

Classified documents have been discovered in Biden’s possession at several locations, hundreds of miles apart, ranging from a prior office in Washington, D.C., to his home and his garage in Delaware. We also have learned that Biden may have removed documents from a [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility] while he was a senator and kept those documents.

Biden has publicly declared that he has “no regrets” and assured Americans that the special counsel investigation would soon peter out when it determined that “there is no ‘there’ there.”

Yet, his claim that these documents were inadvertently removed from the Senate and the White House strain credulity. You do not just inadvertently remove classified documents from a SCIF and then retain them for almost two decades.

Moreover, the documents from the period of the Obama administration were not just removed but were then divided and repeatedly moved to different locations. One document reportedly ended up in Biden’s personal library. The movement and division of the documents suggest purpose and knowledge.

And who hires lawyers to serve as movers unless one knows that the items being moved are not just typical office supplies?

In January this column explored the holes in a popular media defense of Mr. Biden’s conduct as vice president based on an Obama-era executive order. It was clear then and is clear now that Mr. Biden’s senatorial conduct is even harder to defend:

Whatever presidential authorities exist and may or may not extend to vice presidents, they surely do not protect Mr. Biden’s actions during his career as a senator. “He’s completely naked,” says Journal contributor David Rivkin.
Advertisement - Scroll to Continue


***

Mr. Biden can hardly claim that he didn’t understand the rules on classified information while he served as a senator. As early as the 1970s he was working on legislation to prevent others from disclosing government secrets. Throughout his career working on foreign policy and legal issues he was involved in numerous disputes over the handling of classified information.

In 1977 Spencer Rich reported for the Washington Post:

The nomination of Theodore C. Sorensen as Central Intelligence Agency director appeared in grave danger yesterday, amid reports that several members of the Senate Intelligence Committee have asked President-elect Jimmy Carter to withdraw Sorensen’s name or face the possibility he will not be confirmed.

The Intelligence Committee begins hearings Monday on Sorensen. His problems result from sworn affidavits, which he submitted in the 1971 Pentagon papers case and the 1972 trial of Daniel Ellsberg, that he had taken classified materials from the White House when he left it in 1964 after being a top aide to the late President Kennedy...

The affidavits were called to the committee’s attention by Sen. Joe Biden Jr. (D-Del.), a member... In his affidavits, according to several members of the Intelligence Committee, Sorensen admitted that when he left the White House in 1964, he took with him 67 boxes of the material accumulated during his years as President Kennedy’s top White House staff aide, including seven boxes of classified documents, such as copies of Kennedy-Khruchev materials, materials on the Congo, Bay of Pigs, Laos and Berlin crises, and a transcript of the Kennedy-Khruschev meetings in Vienna.

The affidavits also indicates [sic] he donated some of the material to the National Archives and received a tax break.
***

“One of the leakiest buildings in the nation’s capital is the Capitol building,” reported Charles Osgood on his eponymous CBS News program in October of 2001. Here’s an excerpt from the transcript:

OSGOOD: Members of Congress, especially those on key committees, have been getting briefings on the war against terrorism, but from now on, President Bush is not going to tell them everything.

Pres. BUSH: And there may be some heartburn on Capitol Hill. But I suggest if they want to relieve that heartburn, that they take their positions very seriously.
OSGOOD: He sent members a memo telling them as much. Senator Joe Biden, Democrat of Delaware.
Senator JOE BIDEN: He said he was angry. He was angry as the devil. If I were the president, I would have probably sent... the same darned memo.
OSGOOD: What got Mr. Bush so mad, apparently, was that after a supposedly secret briefing of Biden’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week, word got out that the assessed probability of new terrorist attacks was 100 percent.
Pres. BUSH: Classified information must be held dear, that there’s a responsibility that if you receive a briefing of classified information, you have a responsibility, and some members did not accept that responsibility. Somebody didn’t.
***

James Freeman is the co-author of “Borrowed Time: Two Centuries of Booms, Busts and Bailouts at Citi” and also the co-author of “The Cost: Trump, China and American Revival.”