Author Topic: Sex (as in Male and Female) Gender, Gay, Lesbian  (Read 340957 times)

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18601
    • View Profile
Shepard - death used for political BS / & Biden
« Reply #650 on: October 13, 2023, 08:36:59 AM »
wow , I did not recall the *true story*

thank you Doug for clarification

Funny how LEFT gay mob still trying to celebrate the anniversary for a totally bogus reason

Even the dope in chief is playing (the audience are fools ) game :

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-biden-had-this-to-say-on-the-25th-anniversary-of-the-murder-of-matthew-shepard/ar-AA1iajg3

definitely FAKE NEWS!




Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2023
    • View Profile
Iran Lowers the Gender Boom
« Reply #651 on: April 11, 2024, 07:06:53 PM »
I generally dislike this source as they reliably embrace most “Progressive” tropes and embrace a frothing case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. I follow ‘em nonetheless primarily for their counterpoints as they can at least aptly articulate their beliefs, which is more than I can say about most “Progressives.”

And, unlike most “Progressives,” Just Security condemns in no uncertain terms the “gender apartheid” imposed on women by Islamic regimes. Here they take Iran to task over its Orwellian imposition of sanctioned garb and chastity upon women, complete with a “police” force and network of informers focused on the enforcement of these ridiculous edicts:

Iran’s Hijab and Chastity Bill Underscores the Need to Codify Gender Apartheid

Just Security / by Shadi Sadr / Apr 11, 2024 at 9:08 AM

The United Nations Sixth Committee has just concluded deliberating on the draft convention on crimes against humanity. Several states have underscored the necessity of incorporating “gender apartheid” into the list of crimes against humanity outlined in the draft. As the Islamic Republic of Iran intensifies its gender apartheid policies and laws, it serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need to criminalize such gender-based violations under international law.

Iran’s Newest Gender Restriction

The 70-article Hijab and Chastity Bill is nearing its final steps to become law in Iran. It targets not only women who defy mandatory Islamic veiling rules but would also impact import companies and the textile, fashion, tourism, and hospitality industries, which provide goods and services to such women. According to the bill, by doing so, these industries promote a culture of ‘nudity, unchastity, being without hijab, or with a loose hijab’ and shall be subject to punishment ranging from monetary fines to the loss of their licenses.

The bill was a reaction from the authorities to the popular uprising known as the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, sparked by the death of 22-year-old Kurdish woman Jina Mahsa Amini while in the custody of the morality police for not properly wearing the Islamic veil. Despite a brutal crackdown, women’s widespread defiance of the veiling rules has persisted.

Initiated by the government, the bill passed through parliament in an extraordinarily expedited process and has encountered some back-and-forth with the Guardian Council. This body ensures that legislation aligns with Islamic rules and the Constitution. As soon as the Guardian Council is satisfied with the revisions currently being made by Parliament, the bill will become part of Iran’s laws and be enforced.

The bill will increase gender-segregated spaces and surveillance resources. Punishments for women not wearing the Islamic hijab in public will escalate to five to ten years in prison. It criminalizes actions from posting unveiled photos on social media to protesting hijab rules or collaborating with foreign media and governments against mandatory hijab laws. Celebrities breaking the law face severe penalties, and business owners could face fines, closure, and license revocation. The bill also allocates a significant budget to establish a central hub within the Ministry of Interior, to which ministries, state organs, and law enforcement agencies must report their compliance with the Hijab and Chastity regulation.

Security forces and police would be charged with identifying those without hijab in public or online, forwarding their cases to judicial authorities. Surveillance will expand through both human and artificial intelligence, with ‘Hijab Watchers’ and CCTV cameras monitoring public spaces. The watchers’ reports, along with CCTV footage, would be matched with government databases to identify women. Surveillance would extend to vehicle registrations and fines for unveiled women would be automatically deducted from their bank accounts,with text notifications and appeal options provided. Women’s bank accounts could be easily discovered through an inquiry to the Central Bank.

Even before the bill’s official enactment, many of these measures are already employed against women challenging the veiling rules. A notable recent incident involved a young woman in Qom being filmed by a cleric for her loosely worn hijab. The video capturing the tense confrontation between her and the cleric has gone viral, sparking nationwide outrage. Yet, authorities arrested four people for distributing the video. The U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Iran has described the new measures imposed on women and girls by the government, and the ‘Hijab and Chastity Bill’ in particular, as a form of gender apartheid. He stated: “authorities appear to be governing through systemic discrimination with the intention of suppressing women and girls into total submission”.

Applying the Parameters of Gender Apartheid in Iran

Gender apartheid has not yet been recognized as an international crime against humanity, nor have its constituting elements. However, by applying the legal framework of racial apartheid to gender apartheid, the End Gender Apartheid‘ campaign suggests the crime of gender apartheid is defined as “inhumane acts…, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination… by one gender group over another gender group or groups, and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.” This definition encapsulates the situation in Iran, where every facet of women’s lives, bodies, and autonomy is affected.

The institutionalized regime of systematic oppression is marked by state-sanctioned control over women’s bodies and agency based on gender, regardless of their other identities such as religion or nationality. Central to this regime are the mandatory hijab and gender segregation. Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code, which criminalizes defiance of Islamic hijab rules and breaches of gender segregation as sinful or indecent public acts, serves as the cornerstone of this gender-based systematic oppression.

These rules, along with other regulations, empower various entities in workplaces and educational, healthcare, and cultural settings to enforce a broad spectrum of disciplinary actions and restrictions on women who flout mandatory hijab and gender segregation directives. In doing so, they infringe upon women’s human rights, including the rights to personal liberty, security, freedom of movement, and protection from torture and mistreatment, while also undermining their ability to enjoy human rights equally with men. This encompasses rights to education, employment, the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, freedom of movement in public spaces, and participation in recreational and sports activities. Manifestations of these violations include university expulsions, dormitory exclusions, job terminations, and public space bans for improper veiling or for entering male-only spaces.

Inhumane acts, including arbitrary arrests and detention to enforce mandatory hijab and gender segregation, have been widely and persistently employed by authorities in response to resistance against exclusionary policies. These incidents often involve excessive force, humiliation, intimidation, and both verbal and physical abuse, alongside court-ordered fines. In certain cases, women have faced lashing as a cruel punishment after unfair trials. The Iranian authorities’ treatment of women detained for improper hijab has included torture, such as rape and other sexual abuses, sometimes resulting in fatalities. The violence against women for resisting mandatory hijab and gender segregation has inflicted significant suffering and serious injury to their mental or physical health.

Systematic domination by one gender group over another is applied through laws and policies which are deliberately designed to substantiate a hierarchy between men and women and perpetuate structural gender discrimination. These rules control and restrict the behaviour of both men and women and are firmly grounded in ideals of male ‘superiority’ and ‘female inferiority’ along stereotypical gender roles. The Constitution bars women from top political positions, allowing them limited judicial roles requiring male endorsement. Marriage laws set the legal age at 13 for girls and 15 for boys, with children marriagable below these ages with father or paternal grandfather guardian application and court approval. Virgin women need their male guardian’s permission to marry, and only men can pass Iranian nationality to children. Men may have multiple wives and hold absolute authority in the household, including over wives’ residence, employment, and travel. Marital rape is not criminalized, and wives face alimony loss for disobedience of husbands’ sexual desires. Divorce rights heavily favor men and custody laws privilege mothers only for children under 7, shifting to fathers thereafter. Inheritance laws also disadvantage women, granting them significantly smaller shares than men. The Penal Code sets different criminal responsibility ages for boys (15) and girls (9) and values women’s blood money —financial compensation for murder and bodily injuries— and court testimony at half that of men’s.

Intentions of maintaining the apartheid regime against women are evident from the Iranian authorities’ actions and statements. High-ranking officials have repeatedly emphasized that the Islamic Republic’s identity is founded on a dystopian view where gender dictates one’s position within the family, society, and politics, along with access to certain rights. This is enforced through oppressive regulations over women’s bodies and autonomy, and deeply discriminatory laws and practices ensuring male dominance over women.

Furthermore, the development of the Hijab and Chastity Bill by the government, in consultation with the judiciary and passage by Parliament, serves as clear evidence of the Islamic Republic’s commitment to upholding gender apartheid as a governance system. This bill introduces even more restrictive measures and severe penalties for those who challenge the gender-biased laws and segregation policies.

Conclusion

The Islamic Republic of Iran has pursued a Handmaid’s Tale style dystopian Sharia-based system, turning women’s bodies into ideological battlegrounds both privately and publicly. This was aimed at instituting a regime where gender determined one’s status as ‘superior’ or ‘subjugated’. The enforcement of mandatory hijab rules, along with laws deeply discriminatory towards women, was the key strategy used to push women into a ‘second-class position.’ At the same time, gender segregation policies reinforced a social order that, while ensuring male dominance, subjected both men and women to strict control and compliance.

Since the early years after the 1979 revolution, Iranian women have used ‘gender apartheid’ or ‘sexual apartheid’ to describe their plight, drawing parallels with South Africa’s apartheid regime. This comparison emphasized the gravity of their oppression and the need for international intervention similar to that against South African apartheid. Yet, despite global readiness to combat racial oppression, gender-based discrimination in Iran has been largely ignored. The international criminal law and its gatekeepers, who have historically overlooked women’s rights violations, must acknowledge Iran’s oppression, codify gender apartheid as a crime against humanity, and lead the international community to undertake its obligations to end such practices by the Islamic Republic.

IMAGE: An activist displays a placard inscribed with the words “Women, Life, Freedom”, during a demonstration in support of demonstrators in Iran, in front of the Brandenburg Gate lit up with the words “Woman, Life, Freedom” in various languages including Kurdish and Persian, in Berlin on December 13, 2022. (Photo by JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP via Getty Images)

The post Iran’s Hijab and Chastity Bill Underscores the Need to Codify Gender Apartheid appeared first on Just Security.

https://www.justsecurity.org/94504/iran-hijab-bill-gender-apartheid/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=iran-hijab-bill-gender-apartheid

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18367
    • View Profile
Gender News (2020), Men and Women are Different
« Reply #652 on: April 14, 2024, 09:44:09 AM »
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205132404.htm#:~:text=But%20even%20with%20roughly%20uniform,with%20time%20and%20with%20purpose.

"Acccording to new research from the University of Utah. Males' upper bodies are built for more powerful punches than females', says the study, published in the Journal of Experimental Biology... For years, Carrier has been exploring the hypothesis that generations of interpersonal male-male aggression long in the past have shaped structures [as if there was no Designer] in human bodies to specialize for success in fighting... It's already known that males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'. But it's not known why. ... "
« Last Edit: April 14, 2024, 09:46:23 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18601
    • View Profile
Woman: I am a married bisexual
« Reply #653 on: April 14, 2024, 10:36:09 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/i-m-a-bisexual-woman-married-to-a-man-people-questioning-my-sexuality-caused-me-to-come-out-queer-instead/ar-AA1i2bvA?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=ecddb5ed64174b8493751a44c88420ce&ei=17

my own feelings on this:

I don't give a damn.
I don't care to read this endless shit.
Do what you want but I am so tired of endless headlines about this personal crap.
God almighty - we get it already!

Thank you all for listening.... :-D

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18367
    • View Profile
Re: Woman: I am a married bisexual
« Reply #654 on: April 14, 2024, 10:40:59 AM »
Yes, wouldn't it be nice if they would fully exercise their cherished right of privacy.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69662
    • View Profile
Sex and Gender
« Reply #655 on: April 24, 2024, 09:17:01 AM »
Help me think this one through.

There are two SEXES:  Male and Female.

When the Woke substitute the word "GENDER" for "SEX" then the camel nose is in the tent for all kinds of verbal misdirection, obfuscation, and sleight of hand.

So maybe our efficient tactic is to reassert the word SEX as in what SEX someone is and not use terms related to whether someone is a "pitcher" or a "catcher"?

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18367
    • View Profile
Re: Sex and Gender, Biden Title IX attack on women's sports
« Reply #656 on: April 25, 2024, 09:27:58 PM »
For one thing, it seems that National Review read your post.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/bidens-attack-on-womens-sports/

Is the 'woman' vote paying attention to this.  Suburban Moms, Dads too, do you want your daughters' opportunities taken away by boys, men in 'transition'?

At my daughter's high school, 100 girls went out for the tennis team.  Maybe more for soccer.  Girls' and women's sports are not small matters affecting very few.

The controversy isn't new:
https://search.brave.com/search?q=rene+richards&source=desktop

My question, if there are more than two genders, why do the transition people think they can be in one that isn't theirs?  Start your own.

« Last Edit: April 25, 2024, 09:31:34 PM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18367
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69662
    • View Profile
Re: Sex (as in Male and Female) Gender, Gay, Lesbian
« Reply #658 on: April 30, 2024, 01:13:28 PM »
Hallelujah!

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18601
    • View Profile
Re: Sex (as in Male and Female) Gender, Gay, Lesbian
« Reply #659 on: April 30, 2024, 02:54:49 PM »
" Rishi Sunak is starting to show signs of positive leadership."

smarter than many college presidents, at least one Supreme Court Justice, the US President, Head of HHS
and too many more on the crat side.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18367
    • View Profile
Men in women's sports, destroying them
« Reply #660 on: May 11, 2024, 04:36:46 AM »
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/surf-legend-bethany-hamilton-rips-california-officials-competition-reverses-stance-trans-athletes
---'--------

My ongoing question about this, when do women recognize that the Democratic party and the Democratic elected officials are their enemy? Girls and women's sports are important and valuable and this new ideology is destroying them. Conservatives and Republicans have their best interests in mind. When will the so-called soccer moms recognize that?
« Last Edit: May 11, 2024, 05:36:48 AM by Crafty_Dog »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2023
    • View Profile
Disparate Earnings Based on Gender? Not so Fast
« Reply #661 on: May 15, 2024, 01:08:02 PM »
An interesting approach taken here is examining the supposed earnings disparities by using success rates of IVF treatments and comparing it against earning ability. More to it, but this appears to be a powerful refutation of sundry gender driven tropes:

https://www.maximum-progress.com/p/is-there-really-a-child-penalty-in?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=856102&post_id=144641993&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=5b6e5&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69662
    • View Profile
Re: Sex (as in Male and Female) Gender, Gay, Lesbian
« Reply #663 on: May 17, 2024, 11:42:26 AM »
They were seeking a preliminary injuction, yes?

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2023
    • View Profile
Gender: From Academia to Advocacy
« Reply #664 on: May 21, 2024, 09:23:08 AM »
This piece contains some deeply subversive to the "Progressive" point of view elements. I'd paste it here, but there is more italicized text than I can format at the moment, and seeing the italics are important to understanding the piece:

https://reason.com/volokh/2024/05/21/what-is-sex/