Author Topic: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces  (Read 925741 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2400 on: October 27, 2024, 06:37:30 PM »
Thank you.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19742
    • View Profile
Peanut
« Reply #2403 on: November 04, 2024, 07:32:05 AM »
reminds me of the day I am sitting in front of my TV and happen to notice something sitting on top of the curtain rack.  I am looking and wondering what in tarnation it is as it did not move.

I wasn't sure if real or what.  So I got up off my derriere and got close and yes it was a squirrel.

We called someone to get it out of the house because despite opening the door it would not run out.  Instead it ran to a few windows and chewed some of the wooden sills.   Finally we got it to run out.  No thought of euthanizing and checking for rabies even entered our minds.  It got into the house through the chimney.

As for Peanut -  I don't get why they just could not let the man keep the squirrel which clearly was not rabid and maybe pay a fine and apply for the license.

What was the harm?

How stupid.

Darn bureaucrats.   

Like Justice Gorsuch's book describes - too many laws - to many ways anyone could be charged with something.

Awful.  No end is sight from the government SS .


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2404 on: November 04, 2024, 07:40:44 AM »
Note the face of the woman bureaucrat who ran the operation.  Straight out of Auschwitz.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2406 on: November 05, 2024, 06:59:24 AM »
That is an amazing collection of photographs.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2407 on: November 05, 2024, 08:27:46 AM »
Rodent lives matter.

I like this blogger’s writing skills and ability to follow a thread across 1200 words or more while dropping well stated paragraphs like this one along the way:

“Put a Kamala ad alongside a Trump ad and the difference tells you everything. The first is a product of a committee of people who have never met a real person in their entire lives. It’s actors hired to play ordinary people, mouthing lines written by purple haired twenty somethings who have never had a real job. It hilariously presents a complete misreading of the people it opposes, and an equally cartoonish misreading of the people it supports. This is what you get when your ideology never bumps into reality.”

The entire piece is well worth a read:

https://jupplandia.substack.com/p/why-even-the-squirrel-matters?r=2k0c5&triedRedirect=true

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
Of Racist Dixieland Jihads, Appalachian Goblins’ Dens, & Bannon’s Revenge
« Reply #2408 on: November 06, 2024, 09:41:38 PM »
This is a wide ranging piece with plenty of links leading to other fine rabbit holes to explore. Note the Bannon interlude and his promise of a deep dive into all the indications of a steal in 2020 (81 million votes cast in the middle of a pandemic, compared to 64 million on the 5th? Fat chance, something ain’t right with those and other numbers).

Indeed, what—given the increased Republican poll watching/vote integrity efforts—if a cheat was still attempted and say ⅓ of the 2020-2024 delta (call it 6 million) of Harris votes dropped by dead people, illegals, & fake people at fake address in blue states for Commander Cackles and the down ticket were subtracted? Trump ends up with 350+ Electoral College votes, a filibuster proof senate emerges, one that could confirm EVERY judge Trump puts forth, while the house remains firmly in, not republican hands, but Trump coalition hands, perhaps to a point where the usual midterm losses doesn’t change control of either chamber? Sh!t oh dear, a lot of folks on the left would be embracing seppuku as the only way to exit the field with a degree of grace and dignity.

Bannon had some time set aside to do a lot of thinking on the topic. If he delivers on 2020 it could prove seismic.

That’s just one interesting avenue this piece presents to mull. Highly recommend clicking on link and vids, particularly the vids where more astute Dem talking heads drill down into the schooling they just endured and speak to it as the rest of the panel sits in stunned silence, clearly hoping of any sort of segue that will allow them to get back to blaming the victims in flyover country for being so gauche about tampons in men’s rooms et al:

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/election-aftermath-notes-on-the-grand?r=2k0c5&triedRedirect=true

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2409 on: November 07, 2024, 05:53:10 AM »
As is usually the case with Simplicius, the read engages with an unusual mix of the deeply perceptive, the glib, and . . .  whatever it is that we call his final paragraph:

"In the meantime, I’ll leave you with the unconventional words of imminent economist Sergei Glazyev on today’s occasion:

Sergey Glazyev:

The ostriches are running away, Pax Americana is ending. The Leo Strauss sect, which ruled the USA and planned to establish a world dictatorship of the chosen few, is losing the election. The US deep state has no choice either - a repeat of the falsification will lead to a civil war and the collapse of the country. Pragmatists who recognize the fact of the transition to a new world economic order are coming to power in the USA. Brzezinski’s strategy of defeating Russia, destroying Iran and isolating China, as expected, only strengthened China, which has become a global leader. Together with India, it will form a new bipolar center of the new world economic system. The USA can integrate into it as another center of the world economy if it abandons imperialism and stops the global hybrid war. It is in the US national interest that Trump liberate the US from the ostrich [Straussian] sect that has saddled it. Bringing Washington’s policies in line with the US national interest will entail poisoning Europe and the fall of the anti-human traitorous regimes in Germany and France. As we predicted, the world hybrid war, started by the US power-financial elite for world domination in 2001 with the attack of the US intelligence services on the Twin Towers in New York, will end next year with the universal recognition of its defeat and the completion of the transition to a new world economic order. The world will become polycentric and polycurrency, the significance of national sovereignty and international law will be restored."

objectivist1

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 1058
    • View Profile
Greenfield: American Uprising
« Reply #2410 on: November 07, 2024, 06:09:01 AM »
American Uprising

Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:40 PM PST by Daniel Greenfield


This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution.

It’s midnight in America. The day before million of Americans got up and stood in front of the great iron wheel that had been grinding them down. They stood there even though the media told them it was useless. They took their stand even while all the chattering classes laughed and taunted them.

They were fathers who couldn’t feed their families anymore. They were mothers who couldn’t afford health care. They were workers whose jobs had been sold off to foreign countries. They were sons who didn’t see a future for themselves. They were daughters afraid of being murdered by the “unaccompanied minors” flooding into their towns. They took a deep breath and they stood.

They held up their hands and the great iron wheel stopped.

The Great Blue Wall crumbled. The states fell one by one right down to Pennsylvania.  The working class that had been overlooked and trampled on for so long got to its feet. It rose up against its oppressors and the rest of the nation, from coast to coast, rose up with it.

They fought back against their jobs being shipped overseas while their towns filled with migrants that got everything while they got nothing. They fought back against being told that they had to watch what they say. They fought back against being held in contempt because they wanted to work for a living and take care of their families.

They fought and they won.

This wasn’t a vote. It was an uprising. Like the ordinary men chipping away at the Berlin Wall, they tore down an unnatural thing that had towered over them. And as they watched it fall, they marveled at how weak and fragile it had always been. And how much stronger they were than they had ever known.

Who were these people? They were leftovers and flyover country. They didn’t talk right or think right. They had the wrong ideas, the wrong clothes and the ridiculous idea that they still mattered.

They couldn’t change anything. A thousand politicians and pundits had talked of getting them to adapt to the inevitable future. Instead they got in their pickup trucks and drove out to vote.

And they changed everything.

Americans were told that walls couldn’t be built and factories couldn’t be opened. That treaties couldn’t be unsigned and wars couldn’t be won. It was impossible to ban Muslim terrorists from coming to America or to deport the illegal aliens turning towns and cities into gangland territories. It was all impossible. And they did the impossible. They turned the world upside down.

It’s midnight in America. CNN is weeping. MSNBC is wailing.  It wasn’t supposed to happen. The same machine that crushed the American people for two straight terms, the mass of government, corporations and non-profits that ran the country, was set to win.

Instead the people stood in front of the machine. They blocked it with their bodies. They went to vote even though the polls told them it was useless. They looked at the empty factories and barren farms. They drove through the early cold. They waited in line. They came home to their children to tell them that they had done their best for their future. They bet on America. And they won.

They won improbably. And they won amazingly.

They were tired of seeing their America disappear. And they stood up and fought back. This was their last hope. Their last chance to be heard.

The media had the election wrong all along. This wasn’t about personalities. It was about the impersonal. No one will ever interview all those men and women. We will never see all their faces. But they are us and we are them. They came to the aid of a nation in peril. They did what real Americans have always done. They did the impossible.

America is a nation of impossibilities. We exist because our forefathers did not take no for an answer. Not from kings or tyrants. Not from the elites who told them that it couldn’t be done.

The day when we stop being able to pull of the impossible is the day that America will cease to exist.

Today is not that day. Today fifty million Americans did the impossible.

Midnight has passed. A new day has come. And everything is about to change.

« Last Edit: November 07, 2024, 06:58:07 AM by Crafty_Dog »
"You have enemies?  Good.  That means that you have stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2411 on: November 07, 2024, 10:16:07 AM »
As is usually the case with Simplicius, the read engages with an unusual mix of the deeply perceptive, the glib, and . . .  whatever it is that we call his final paragraph:

"In the meantime, I’ll leave you with the unconventional words of imminent economist Sergei Glazyev on today’s occasion:

Sergey Glazyev:

The ostriches are running away, Pax Americana is ending. The Leo Strauss sect, which ruled the USA and planned to establish a world dictatorship of the chosen few, is losing the election. The US deep state has no choice either - a repeat of the falsification will lead to a civil war and the collapse of the country. Pragmatists who recognize the fact of the transition to a new world economic order are coming to power in the USA. Brzezinski’s strategy of defeating Russia, destroying Iran and isolating China, as expected, only strengthened China, which has become a global leader. Together with India, it will form a new bipolar center of the new world economic system. The USA can integrate into it as another center of the world economy if it abandons imperialism and stops the global hybrid war. It is in the US national interest that Trump liberate the US from the ostrich [Straussian] sect that has saddled it. Bringing Washington’s policies in line with the US national interest will entail poisoning Europe and the fall of the anti-human traitorous regimes in Germany and France. As we predicted, the world hybrid war, started by the US power-financial elite for world domination in 2001 with the attack of the US intelligence services on the Twin Towers in New York, will end next year with the universal recognition of its defeat and the completion of the transition to a new world economic order. The world will become polycentric and polycurrency, the significance of national sovereignty and international law will be restored."

I took that 'graph as a tongue in cheek grasp of the ironic, but don't know this blogger well enough to be sure of that assessment. He does have numerous fabulous turns of phrases in his piece and, as noted, his well sourced links are also worth a dive into.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2024, 11:53:02 PM by Body-by-Guinness »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2412 on: November 07, 2024, 02:22:57 PM »
I'm a subscriber.

And absolutely the man can turn a phrase!

The military specificity of his Uke coverage is unusually deep, not necessarily honest, and certainly pro-Russian.  When Israel comes up he is quite anti-semitic. I showed some of his stuff to some special friends of mine and they have asked me to share it with them.  If one is up to spotting his pro-Russian psyops, he can do a very, very good job of puncturing lies we tell ourselves.  Hard to picture one man assembling what he regularly assembles.  I wonder if he is financed and sourced by the Russians.

For example, let's look at the closing paragraph once again.

"Brzezinski’s strategy of defeating Russia, destroying Iran and isolating China, as expected, only strengthened China, which has become a global leader."

Carter's NSC advisor?!?

No, it was Kissinger-Nixon who peeled China away from Russia, and it was Clinton or Bush 43 (IIRC) who brought China into the WTO organization-- which is where it really took off. 

"As we predicted, the world hybrid war, started by the US power-financial elite for world domination in 2001 with the attack of the US intelligence services on the Twin Towers in New York,"

Seriously?!?

He is super bright, super disingenuous, very good at puncturing our own lies, and probably on the Russian payroll.  By all means read- I certainly do-- but let we the reader beware.



Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
Change Resistant Resistance
« Reply #2413 on: November 09, 2024, 09:27:25 AM »
Not only are their positions, as Turley points out, unpopular, but Trump would have to be quite naive not to be well prepared for what he’s already endured:

'Second Resistance to Trump' has already begun, but it won't work so well this time
Democrats prepare for Trump resistance
•The Hill News / by Jonathan Turley / Nov 9, 2024 at 10:50 AM

The single most common principle of recovery programs is that the first step is to admit that you have a problem.

That first step continues to elude the politicians and pundits who unsuccessfully pushed lawfare and panic politics for years. That includes prosecutors like New York Attorney General Letitia James and politicians like Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who affirmed this week that they will be redoubling, not reconsidering, their past positions.

For its part, The Washington Post quickly posted an editorial titled "The second resistance to Trump must start now." They may, however, find the resistance more challenging both politically and legally this time around.

It is important to note at the outset that there is no reason Democratic activists should abandon their values just because they lost this election. Our system is strengthened by passionate and active advocacy.

Rather, it is the collective fury and delirium of the post-election protests that was so disconcerting. Pundits lashed out at the majority of voters, insisting that the election established that half of the nation is composed of racists, misogynists or domination addicts who long to submit to tyranny.

Others blamed free speech and the fact that social media allows "disinformation" to be read by ignorant voters. In other words, the problem could not possibly be themselves. It was, rather, the public, which refused to listen.

That does not bode well for the Democratic Party. As someone raised in a liberal politically active family in Chicago, I had hoped for greater introspection after this election blowout.

Ordinarily, recovery can begin with "a terrible experience" when someone hits rock bottom.

After a crushing electoral defeat and the loss of the White House and likely both houses of Congress, one would think that Democrats would be ready for that first step to recovery. However, those hoping for a new leaf on the left do not understand the true addictive hold of rage.

In my recent book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage," I explore rage and our long history of rage politics. There is a certain release that comes with rage in allowing people to do and say things that you would never do or say. People rarely admit it, but they like it. It is the ultimate high produced by the lowest form of political discourse.

Over the course of the last eight years, the U.S. has become a nation of rage addicts.

For months, Democratic leaders denounced Donald Trump and his supporters as fascists and neo-Nazis. President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and others suggested that democracy itself was about to die unless Democrats were kept in power.

Just before the election, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul called those voting for Trump "anti-American." By Hochul's measure, over half of the American electorate is now "anti-American."

James is the face of lawfare. She may have done more to reelect Trump than anyone other than the president himself. She ran on nailing Trump on something, anything. In New York, she was joined by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in this ill-conceived effort. They fulfilled the narrative of a weaponized legal system. Every new legal action seemed to produce another surge in polling for Trump.

Yet there James was, soon after the election, with another press conference promising again to unleash the powers of her office to stop Trump's policies.

Then there was Pritzker, doing the community theater version of "The Avengers" and declaring, “You come for my people, you come through me.”

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) added that he too will "fight to the death" against Trump's agenda.

Rather than lower the rhetoric, these rage-addicts ran out for another hit.

Our prior periods of rage politics were largely ended by the public in major election shifts like the one this month. Things, however, are different this time around both politically and legally. The problem for the resistance is the very democracy that they claimed to be saving.

Democrats lost after opposing policies supported by an astonishing share of the public at a time of deep political division. That effort included opposing voter ID laws favored by 84 percent of the public, among other things.

They are now committed to opposing policies central to this election blowout, including deportations of illegal immigrants, which is favored in some polls by two-thirds of Americans.

Likewise, Democrats have already doubled down on attacks on free speech, including blaming their loss on the absence of sufficient censorship. On MSNBC, host Mika Brzezinski blamed the loss in part on "massive disinformation." Yet, according to some polls, free speech ranked as high as second among issues on Election Day.

According to CNN, Trump's performance was the best among young people (18-29 years old) in 20 years, the best among Black voters in 48 years, and the best among Hispanic voters in more than 50 years.

Harris actually lost a bit of support with women, and Trump won handily among some groups of women.

None of that seems to matter this time. We have an alliance of political media and academic interests wholly untethered to the views of most of the public. Yet, with both houses of Congress under Republican control, the investigations and impeachment efforts that hounded Trump throughout his first term will be less of a threat in his second term.

For that reason, the center of gravity of the "second resistance" will shift to Democratic prosecutors like James, Bragg and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who was just reelected.

Various Democratic governors are also pledging to thwart Trump's policies despite the results of the election.

The "second resistance" will try to use state power to oppose the very issues and policies that led to this historic political shift. That means that there will be a legal shift in the focus of litigation to inherent federal powers versus state powers. That battle will favor the Trump administration.

In fairness to these Democratic politicians, they are certainly free to go to the courts, as Republicans did under Biden to argue for limitations on federal powers. But the promise of California Gov. Gavin Newsom to "Trump-proof" the state is easier to make rhetorically than it will be to keep legally.

Indeed, Trump will be able to cite a curious ally in this fight: Barack Obama. It was Obama who successfully swatted down state efforts to pursue their own policies and programs on immigration enforcement. Obama insisted that state laws were preempted in the area and the Supreme Court largely agreed in its 2012 decision in Arizona v. U.S.

Congress may even seek to tie the receipt of federal funds to states cooperating with federal mandates. For this reason, Democrats, who campaigned on the promise to end the filibuster for the good of democracy, suddenly became firm believers in that Senate rule right around 2:30 a.m. last Wednesday.

As the majority of the country walks away from the party shaking their heads, many activists are left only with their rage. Instead of reappraising the years of far-left orthodoxy and intolerance, some are calling to tear down the system or take drastic individual actions, including for women to break up with their boyfriends and husbands or to cut off their hair.

They will actually keep their rage and dump their relationships. Now that really is an addiction.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage."

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4982093-liberal-rage-addiction-trump/

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
The Obama Invisible Machine Meets Egalitarian Creative Destruction
« Reply #2414 on: November 13, 2024, 01:54:31 PM »
There are significant elements of this essay I disagree with—the author’s faith in “creative destruction” as a moderating dynastic force strikes me as wishful and unpredictable, for one—but his dissection of Obama’s invisible hand schtick is worth mulling:


How Trump crushed Obama’s legacy
The president-elect rides the cowboy spirit

'In one night, the Obama machine, which he built on the model of the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and which he used to help him run the country, including the prestige institutions and the press, was melting down.' (Photo: ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)
DEMOCRATIC PARTYDONALD TRUMP JRKAMALA HARRISPOLITICSREPUBLICAN PARTYUSUS ELECTION
 
 
David Samuels
NOVEMBER 8, 2024   11 MINS
It was long past midnight in Livingston, Montana, when Donald Trump finally stood up to address the nation as President-elect of the United States, having won the landslide victory that had eluded him in his successful run in 2016 and again in his re-election bid in 2020. This time, the American people had overwhelmingly voted for change. They had voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

As a patriotic American, and as a working journalist who believes in the sanctity of that role, I should note here that the only vote I’ve ever cast in a presidential election was for Willie Nelson, the country and western star and a symbol of reconciliation between rednecks and hippies. Still, I was eager to hear what Trump would say. To be more accurate, given my level of inebriation in sub-freezing Montana weather, with snow-globe snow gently falling outside the windows of a local bar, I was eager to mix the some whiskey with the tonalities of America’s greatest living bullshit artist and teller of tall tales. Trump’s voice is a powerful source of connection to the American literary and comic tradition, going back to the Rat Pack and to Mark Twain. I was ready to hear his magnificent instrument resonate with the promise of a better future, a future filled with laughter — and joy, even.

At 3am, West Palm Beach time, Trump’s large family stood with him onstage looking chipper and attractive. They were joined there by the celebrity validators that made Trump’s third run for the White House seem less angry and more inclusive than his prior one-man shows.


At 78, Trump’s relentless pitchman’s energy is at once diminished, and at the same more genial. And no wonder. Since his loss, in 2020, when he claimed that the election was stolen from him — and his opponents claimed that he tried to seize power through illegal means — Trump had been subjected to a whole-of-society assault by the American elite that would have killed most men 20 years younger, including those who don’t eat cheeseburgers most days for lunch. After 116 indictments, an armed raid on his home, the jailing of his business associates, and the looming threat of bankruptcy, followed by two and even three in-person rallies a day for the better part of a year, which led to him being shot in the head by a would-be assassin, the fact that Trump is still standing upright, let alone greeting a crowd as President-elect, is clearly a miracle – the biggest miracle since the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, I can hear Trump saying. Now, he is about to speak. The TV above the bar remains silent.

“Honey, have you ever been in a bar before?” the bartender is asking me. For the past 10 minutes or so, we’ve been politely going back and forth about whether she can turn up the volume on the bar’s television set. All I can hear around me as Trump starts to speak is the noise of a late Tuesday night at the Wagon Wheel.

Sure, I’ve been in plenty of bars before, I answer. “Well, then you know that politics is a subject that men get angry over, and I don’t want that in my bar,” the waitress answers matter-of-factly. “You can read the captions on the TV.”

As sensible as her precautions might seem, there’s an undertone to her replies that reminds me that I am in a town, and not in the countryside. Even out here in the West, in a solid red state that epitomises cowboy culture, it is the divide between urban and exurban places, not the division between so-called red and blue states, that is culturally defining. People living in Brooklyn Heights, or in Austin, Texas or in Missoula, Montana or in Grand Rapids, Iowa, all tend to have more in common with each other than they do with people living even a mere 20 miles away.

“For fuck’s sake, this is history,” I suggest, as I watch Trump’s lips moving. “It’s not politics. Everyone can all put their prejudices aside for five minutes s and hear the man.” She purses her lips, and signals it’s a no-go. Then she offers me a free seltzer.

“We must protect our geniuses, protect our super-geniuses”, the caption-writer translates, as Trump’s lips form grandiloquent and hilarious phrases introducing Elon Musk and his love for rockets. “We have so few of them.”

Trump is clearly one. He’s an American genius, an original of a type that began with P.T. Barnum, and also includes Elon Musk. But neither Barnum nor Musk could ever become President twice, and defeat the entire American power structure. I wish to God I could hear him speak. After overcoming 100+ indictments, and having his X account revoked, the man deserves to have his moment here, in this bar.

I don’t need to hear Trump’s stunned-looking critics in the Party commentariat speak, though. The expressions on their pallid faces say it all. They are reckoning with the extent of their loss, which is turn related to their collective sense of self-importance — which is belied both by tonight’s result and by their viewership numbers. Having cratered public trust in their profession over the past decade by routinely lying to their audience on behalf of the government, which they identified in turn with the Democratic Party, the country’s self-identified defenders of democracy can fume all they want about Trump’s authoritarian, anti-democratic, fascist, Hitlerian leanings. The rest of America is as deaf to their blather as I am.

Praising Elon Musk, the country’s most successful technologist, Trump looks more like an avuncular Caribbean vacation package or waterbed salesman than a would-be Hitler. Meanwhile, party hacks like Joy Reid and the political consultants turned “commentators” like David Axelrod, along with supposed “straight news” types like Jake Tapper of CNN, who had all long ago become indistinguishable from each other, by virtue of drinking the Party Kool-Aid are waving their hands at the cameras like they were calling for smelling salts. But once lost, the trust of an audience is hard to win back.

Trump has also lost a step or two himself. His speeches, once gorgeous arias of invective, innuendo and insult comedy, delivered with the snappy timing of a Vegas Rat Pack headliner, have been transformed into rambling arabesques, like the musings of a slightly dotty family patriarch at the Thanksgiving table. Let us bow our heads, while Loopy Uncle Donald tells us about the deal he made with a Saudi Prince on a golf course. Then everyone can eat more pumpkin pie.


“Trump has also lost a step or two himself.”
Trump had also learned a trick or two along the way, though. He graciously shares the stage, and allows the importance and accomplishments of others to validate his own role as MC. His timing clearly couldn’t have been better. Five years of Covid laws, a stagnant economy, direct and indirect government censorship of social media, official lying and gaslighting on every subject from trans surgeries to the efficacy of masking to the startling numbers of illegal immigrants entering the country to the spectacle of a dottering Joe Biden being barely able to remember his own name, had left most of the country dispirited and ready for change.

As the evening ends, Trump and the political movement he founded will likely control not just the White House but also the Senate, the House, and also the Supreme Court, giving Trump an actual, real-world chance to fulfill his mandate to Make America Great Again. Even though, after a decade of near-constant repetition of the slogan by adherents and detractors, no one can say with any real certainty what it now means.

* * *

As it turns out, the American people are still allowed to vote, regardless of whether their betters decry their choices as racist, sexist, short-sighted, and above all anti-democratic. It’s a paradox that the country’s genius-level elites routinely fail to acknowledge, because they are all profoundly in agreement. We must protect our democracy from those evil anti-democratic forces, American voters, who vote for Donald Trump against the expert guidance of their betters, meaning us.

Meanwhile, the lurching of an increasingly overbearing and at the same time increasingly anarchic and incompetent American state had managed to alarm many Americans who were previously more alarmed by Trump. Over the past weeks, they have been turning out in larger numbers than anyone had imagined — defying the expressed preferences and instructions of the American’ elite’s chief tutelary figure, Barack Obama, who had campaigned very publicly and hard for Kamala Harris, often overshadowing the candidate herself. Obama’s role in the Harris campaign was truthfully less strange than the fact that the former President somehow remained in Washington after his time in the White House was over, instead taking meetings in his Kalorama mansion, which is hardly the most valuable entry in his bulging portfolio of luxury properties — which also includes high Gilded Age mansions in Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard. But it was surely the most important, serving as the centre of his unprecedented Shadow Presidency.

As the leader of the Democratic Party, Obama was hardly a pretender to power in Washington. Rather, between 2008 and the evening of 5 November 2024, he was usually the foremost power in the land. After serving two elected terms in the White House, Obama then set up and captained the so-called “Resistance” to Trump — an activity that was contrary to all prior American norms and practices. After Trump left, Obama stayed in Washington and continued his role as unelected Party Leader during what had been advertised as the Biden Presidency.

Obama’s method of avoiding scrutiny from the pliant DC press was entirely in character, alternately drawing back into the shadows and then, out of whatever ego weakness, announcing that he was the true mover of events. Free from normative oversight or responsibility, he and his retainers could also avoid answering questions about the size or sources of his personal fortune, which was rumoured to amount to somewhere between $500 million and $1 billion. As a private citizen, Obama didn’t have to answer questions. He could have it both ways — state power, with no public responsibility.

Until he misstepped. By compelling Biden to withdraw in favour of Harris, who turned out to be an even worse candidate than a senile old man who had begun to resemble a badly taxidermied deer, Obama broke the unspoken agreement that had put him beyond scrutiny. Disappearing the sitting President from the Democratic Party ticket against his will, for reasons that were obviously contrary to what the press had been telling Americans about Biden’s incredibly acute mental functioning up, and replacing him with a candidate that no one in the party had actually voted for, required some sort of comment, however brief. It made it impossible, if only for a week or two, to maintain the fiction that Obama was simply living in Washington DC while staying out of politics. If Biden was senile, then who was actually running the country? Who had enough clout to order the President’s removal from the ticket?

The answer in both cases was Obama. And now he was on the hook not only for Kamala Harris, but retroactively for the more general mess that he and his operatives had helped to make of the country. Everywhere from Harvard University, his alma mater, where he helped install a repeat plagiarist as the University’s President, to the Middle East, which went up in flames the moment he was able to re-animate his Iran Deal, which appeared to be even stupider — if not as expensive — as George W. Bush’s determination to transform Afghanistan and Iraq into Western-style democratic societies at the point of a gun, the Party Leader’s Midas Touch-in-reverse was evident, even if no one ever breathed a single word of criticism.

Yet Americans, of all races and creeds, felt themselves to be living in a dystopian version of Alice in Wonderland, controlled by an unseen hand — and they didn’t like it. If the elite pollsters and expert predictors who had failed to foresee a Trump win had familiarised themselves with American history, instead of parroting the talking points of Obama and his operatives, they would have seen a country eager for a renewal of the freedoms that the vast majority of Americans embrace as their birthright.

Seeing Americans as one people, with a common culture and character, shaped by a common history, is not something that America’s new elites know how to do, though. From kindergarten on, they are taught otherwise. Ivy League universities, the crucible in which the new class has been forged, base admissions and hiring decisions not on measures of objective performance, but on their ranking in the ever-shifting hierarchies of Party-sanctioned identity groups. The ability to sort Americans into bureaucratic categories like BIPOC, MENA, LGBTQ+ and other alphabet soup constructions is in fact the defining skill of Obama-era elites. It signifies mastery of in-group codes that help the Democratic Party manage its own top-down constituencies, which are regimented by political operatives and NGO organisers, paid for by billionaire foundations, and embodied in bureaucratic regulations, executive orders, census categories and other legally-binding schemes meant to overcome historical American notions of equality. That’s how the party machine operates.

Now, in one night, the Obama machine, which he built on the model of the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and which he used to run the country, including the prestige institutions and the media, through a combination of bureaucratic capture and social pressure, accentuated by control of large tech platforms, was finally melting down. No wonder the press was in shock. None of the lines that they had been given could be reconciled with the numbers onscreen.

A reckoning will surely come. At the very least, the time has now arrived for Barack Obama to leave Washington and exit American politics, now that his Shadow Presidency — which proved to be even more counter-productive and chaotic than Trump’s first term in office — has gone down in flames.

Meanwhile, the gap between what America’s elites believe, and what the rest of the country believes, has never been wider, probably not since the late 19th century. Back then, Gilded Age America was ruled by a tight group of tycoons and their retainers who positioned themselves as the heirs to the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, the President and the General who together led the Civil War. The further the Republican Party traveled from the Civil War, the more the busts of Lincoln and Grant resembled window-dressing for the extraordinary fortunes of a new oligarchy that traveled in private trains, summered in Newport, and bought every available Old Master painting in Europe to decorate their lavish houses. Economically and morally, the so-called Robber Barons — Morgans, Rockefellers, Goulds, Fricks, Carnegies, Whitneys, Harrimans — had an easy time of it, enjoying the benefits of cheap immigrant labour while flattering themselves as the rightful heirs of the Party that ended slavery. With the exception of Carnegie, a self-made Scotsman and innovative industrialist who gave away his fortune to establish America’s system of public libraries, history doesn’t remember them kindly.

The Democratic Party that Bill and Hillary Clinton built in the Nineties, and Barack Obama then took in a decidedly more radical direction after 2012, won’t be remembered kindly by Americans either. The father of the modern Democratic Party, Franklin D. Roosevelt, was the country’s greatest political leader during what became known as the American Century. Roosevelt kept the country going during the Great Depression, and set it on the path to victory in the Second World War while creating a social safety net for the poor. Remarkably, every American President up until Bill Clinton in 1992 was either a protegee of Roosevelt or at least a private in his army.

The political alliance between urban ethnic machine politicians, including black urban political leaders, and Southern whites that FDR led also undercut the power of the Wasp class, successors to the New England Puritans, who dominated America’s class system and the country’s economy following the Civil War. By curbing their cultural, political, and economic influence, Roosevelt made possible the rise of the American middle class, which made America great, and also more equal.

The Clintons’ embrace of Wall Street and of international trade treaties was the window through which America’s old elites — rooted both in the Northeast as well as in San Francisco — climbed back into history. The China trade flourished, as did Democratic Party’s new Wall Street clients — at the expense of the Party’s traditional working-and-middle class constituencies. Obama brought Silicon Valley’s formerly libertarian-oriented founders on board the gravy train by promising them protection from populists like Bernie Sanders and from his own crew of high-end Chicago shakedown artists. In return, they would pay taxes to the party through campaign and NGO contributions and DEI hiring. Through this new political wiring, Obama completed the transformation of FDR’s Democrats into Gilded Age Republicans.

It will be hard for Donald Trump to top that. But maybe he will. Maybe Elon Musk will entirely revamp the Federal government. Maybe he will actually colonise Mars. Meanwhile, if Trump understands one thing, it’s that America is not Europe, or Asia, or Iraq, or Brazil. American elites come and go, while the capacity for sudden, radical, wide-eyed self-invention and leaps of innovation remain the country’s defining trait.

What outsiders tend to miss is that America was never meant to be stable. It is and has always been an inferno, the epitome of the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter’s idea of creative destruction. The wonder and freedom and heartbreak of American life is that, sooner or later, everything is consumed in the furnace. For all his wealth and success, Elon Musk’s children may worship other gods. His grandchildren may end up in a trailer park, smoking meth. McKinsey consultants with Harvard degrees may wind up unemployed or selling bottled war. Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the country’s most eminent environmental lawyer and the closest thing the Democratic Party has to royalty, may become an antivaccine heretic, be broadly mocked and humiliated by the elite and by the less imaginative members of his own family, run for President, endorse Donald Trump, take on the Big Pharma and Big Ag, and Make America Healthy Again. Or not. All anyone can say for sure is that attempts to game the American system are doomed to failure.

The bigger lesson being that America is just too big — and too wild, and too destructive, and rooted in the idea of individual freedom — for any self-styled “elite” to ride the horse for very long, without being thrown off.

https://unherd.com/2024/11/how-trump-crushed-obamas-legacy/

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
About that Tree
« Reply #2415 on: November 13, 2024, 06:24:13 PM »
2nd post. I’d say this counts as a rant:

https://x.com/JeanRomanik/status/1855980032511898005

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72229
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2416 on: November 14, 2024, 06:51:49 AM »
Yup.

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
The Strange Bedfellows that Won & What Will They Usher In?
« Reply #2417 on: November 17, 2024, 02:50:37 PM »
A new dawn?

The Revolution of 2024
BY Jeffrey A TuckerJEFFREY A. TUCKER   NOVEMBER 16, 2024   GOVERNMENT, MEDIA, SOCIETY   9 MINUTE READ
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

People are out and about, smiling at each other. It’s been true since the morning after the election, the results of which defied every prediction. Who doesn’t like to see the smug elites who have ruled the world for five awful years taken down a peg?

More than that, there are hints of a return to sanity. Mainstream advertisers are suddenly returning to X, putting their economic interest above their tribalist loyalties. The editor of pro-lockdowns Scientific American, which had long blessed totalitarian measures as true science, has resigned.

The attempt to pillage InfoWars and give it to The Onion has been reversed by a federal judge. That might be a fluke or might not be: maybe the lawfare is dialing back too. The cabinet of the incoming administration is being filled by voices that were fully censored for years. Employees are reportedly packing their bags at the FDA and other agencies.

Mainstream news commentators are sputtering around with less bravado than they have shown in years. CNN is firing major personalities.

Trump is talking about abolishing the income tax and granting $10K in tax credits per homeschooled child, not to mention blowing up college accreditation systems, among other sweeping changes.

The American Bastille day is coming, not only freeing the political prisoners of January 6 but also many of the unjustly persecuted including Ross Ulbricht, Roger Ver, and Ian Freeman, among so many others. That will be a day of rejoicing.

Oh, and peace seems to have broken out in some contentious areas of the world, for now.

What is happening? This is not the usual transfer of the resident of the White House. This is starting to look like an actual transfer of power, not just from Biden to Trump but from the permanent government – ensconced in many sectors – that has been long in hiding to an entirely new form of government responsive to actual voters.

As it turns out, there was no late surge for Kamala Harris. All the polls were wrong, and the rest was media blather. What was correct were the betting odds on Polymarket, and only days later, the FBI raided the 26-year-old founder’s home and confiscated his phone and laptop.

There are still many millions of missing voters, people who supposedly showed up for Biden in 2020 but stayed home this time. Meanwhile, there has been a historic shift in all races, ethnicities, and regions, with even the possibility of flipping California from blue to red in the future.

After decades of academic slicing and dicing of the population according to ever more eccentric identity buckets involving race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual interest, along with countless thousands of studies documenting deep complexity over intersectionality, the driving force of the election was simple: class, and the few intellectuals and some wealthy entrepreneurs who understand that.

The division was not really left vs right. It was workers vs laptoppers, wage earners vs six-figure stay-at-homers, bottom half vs top 5 percent, people with actual skills vs weaponized resume wielders, and those with affection for old-world values vs those whose educations have beaten it out of them for purposes of career advancement.

The silent majority has never been so suddenly loud. It just so happened that the heavily privileged had come to inhabit easily identifiable sectors of American society and, in the end, had no choice but hitch the whole of the overclass wagon to the fortunes of a candidate like themselves (Kamala) but who was unable to pull off a compelling masquerade. Not even a parade of well-paid celebrity endorsements could save her from total rebuke at the polls.

Sylvester Stallone called Trump a second George Washington but another reference point might be Andrew Jackson. The overwhelming victory for Trump is on a scale not seen since 1828 when, four years after the presidency was stolen from Jackson, Old Hickory came back in a wild landslide and cleaned up Washington. Trump arrives in Washington with a mandate for the same, with 81% of the public demanding that the government shrink in size and power.

It has all happened so quickly. We are barely ten days into the realization of what just transpired and the entire lay of the land seems different, like a tectonic shift in politics, culture, mood, and possibilities. We are even seeing blunt and open talk about the horrendous Covid response that so utterly demoralized the country and the world, after years of silence on the topic. We have promised hearings coming, and court cases galore now on fast track.

The sudden coming together of three great sectors of anti-establishment fury – MAGA, MAHA, and DOGE – in the last two months of the election of 2024 is one for the ages. It provides the beginnings of an answer to the great question on our minds for decades: how precisely does an authentic revolution take root in an industrialized Western democracy? Are elections capable of delivering real results?

For now, the answer seems to be yes. That should thrill any responsible observer of social, cultural, economic, and political affairs. It means that the early architects of the American system were not wrong. The intolerable costs of political upheaval of ages past can be mitigated by planting power firmly in the hands of the people through the plebiscite. This was their view and their gamble. All the evidence of our time points to the wisdom of the idea.

In the darkest days of the last year of the first Trump presidency, the bureaucracy was riding high, in full revenge mode against an elected government it hated and sought to overthrow. The agencies were passing strange edicts that felt like laws but no one knew for sure. You are essential, you are not. You must stay home, unless you have an emergency. Your elective surgery needs to wait. The kids cannot go to school. That European vacation cannot happen. You can eat at a restaurant but only if you are six feet away from other patrons and you must put this China-made cloth on your mouth if you get up to go to the restroom.

The flurry of edicts was mind-boggling. It felt like martial law, because it was some form of exactly that. The best research points to the astonishing reality that this was never really a public-health response but a scheme by security and intelligence sectors to enact some kind of global color revolution, which is why the policies were so similar the world over. It was indeed an awesome display of power, one that invaded all our communities, homes, and families.

No one knows this better than Team Trump, even if there has been near silence on the topic for all these years. They have had time to put the pieces together and figure out what happened and why. And they carefully, and in seclusion worthy of a Cistercian monastery, plotted their return, leaving nothing to chance.

Meanwhile, the past two years have had the Covid insurrectionists quietly stepping away from the spotlight, while leaving as much of their newfound power in place: the censorship, the technology, the mandates, and the propaganda that all of this shock-and-awe was nothing more than “common sense health measures.” It was never tenable, and vast numbers have come to realize that something went very wrong, like a kind of evil settled over the world and burrowed itself within all institutions.

In an instant, the whole scheme seems to be crumbling. The incredible result is that the administration under which this calamity occurred is now coming back, which is probably the strangest irony of our times.

And yet, even though no one has yet been open about precisely what happened in the White House in March 2020 to cause Trump to greenlight the lockdowns, there is a widespread belief that it was never really his choice. It was some kind of coup – egged on even by his closest advisors and the VP – that he either could not stop or lacked the personnel to marshal effective resistance. Regardless, he has been forgiven because, implausibly, the next administration not only owned the worst of it but added even more on top of that, including the wicked combination of mask mandates, forced injections, and continued school closures.

The result has been a continuing economic crisis, one far worse than agencies admit, in addition to a health, education, and cultural crisis. Meanwhile, all those involved in causing this from behind the scenes have been rewarded with professorships, loving interviews in the mainstream media, and lavish security provisions to protect them from legions of what they suppose are angry workers and peasants.

Therefore, among many of the ruling class, the results of this election are certainly not welcome, and nor are many of the early appointments. They represent the coming together of MAGA, MAHA, and DOGE, the fulfillment of decades of cultivation of disparate groups of dissidents who had not previously realized their common interests and common enemies. It was the Covid era and the imposition of top-down rule that brought them all together.

It was like three groups wandering around in a giant maze who suddenly confront each other and then, realizing that they all shared the same predicament, figure the way out together. These new alliances have not only shattered right and left, as traditionally understood, but reshaped the structural basis of political activism for the duration. It turns out that medical freedom, food freedom, free speech, political freedom, and peace all go together. Who knew?

The incumbent world of academia, think tanks, and most media simply finds itself unprepared to deal with the new realities. They had hoped everyone would forget about the last five years as if it was just a thing that happened but is now over; everyone just needs to grapple with the great reset and learn to love our new lives of surveillance, propaganda, censorship, perpetual war, poison food, unaffordable everything, and endless injections of potions for our own health and well-being.

Well, times have changed. How much? Early signs point to a dramatic unfolding of revolutionary change over the coming months. Is believing this the triumph of hope over experience? Absolutely. Then again, no one believed five years ago that most people in the world would be locked in their homes and communities, stuck drinking and streaming movies until biotech could come up with a cure for a respiratory virus with a zoonotic reservoir. Then it did not work and made people more sick than ever.

That was nuts but it happened.

If that could happen, with predictable results, the response could be equally implausible and more much thrilling. What’s man made can be unmade by man, and something new built in its place.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-revolution-of-2024/

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19435
    • View Profile
Political Rant, interesting thought pieces, Democrats in the Wilderness
« Reply #2418 on: November 19, 2024, 07:20:15 PM »
Amazing the Left most Minneapolis Startribune, now called Minnesota Startribune (?) published this. I will reach behind the pay wall and share with you.
------------
Democrats: The wilderness years?
Here are some parallels from the past.

By John C. “Chuck” Chalberg

November 18, 2024 at 5:44PM

The campus of Howard University is pictured after the conclusion of an election night campaign watch party for Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, Nov. 6 in Washington. (Susan Walsh/The Associated Press)

Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day.
•••
The recently concluded presidential election is not without its historical parallels and ironies, both of which speak to the country’s immediate future, as well as to the future of the Democratic Party. At the same time, both return us to the only Democrats elected to the presidency between the Civil War and the reign of Franklin Roosevelt. That lonely pair would be Grover Cleveland and Woodrow Wilson.

The most obvious parallel would be the non-consecutive terms of Cleveland (our 22nd and 24th president) and Donald Trump (our 45th and soon-to-be 47th president). The less obvious parallel is the returning to power of the anti-Wilson Trump almost exactly 100 years after the death of the actual Wilson in 1924. More on that shortly.

Then there is the possibility that the Democrats could be heading into the political wilderness, which was the party’s fate following its defeats in 1896 (when William McKinley defeated William Jennings Bryan, the anti-Cleveland Democrat) and again in 1920 (when Warren Harding ended eight years of the Wilson administration). Which brings us to 2024.

Will this Democratic defeat trigger another batch of wilderness years for the party? If so, will those years match or exceed the 16 years between their defeat in 1896 and Wilson’s election in 1912? Or will this time in the wilderness be closer to the dozen years between 1920 and the election of FDR in 1932? We’ll see.

There is no precise measurement of “wilderness years,” but the presumption is that it’s longer than just one or even two election cycles — and certainly longer than the eight-year run of a re-elected president. There was no suggestion of Democratic wilderness years during the Eisenhower presidency or of Republicans occupying similar territory during the Clinton years.

In any case, to land in the political wilderness suggests that things have gone seriously awry and that party leaders need to do some equally serious reflection and rethinking while sorting themselves and their message out. Such a process can — and sometimes should — take a good deal of time to resolve.

In 1896 the party spurned the conservative small-government, gold-standard policies of the departing Cleveland to embrace the “free silver,” cheaper money populism of Bryan, who would lose again in 1900. After a brief flirtation with a conservative candidate in 1904 the party returned to Bryan and a third defeat in 1908.

Wilson’s victory in 1912 was made possible by the split within the Republican Party between sitting President William Howard Taft and former President Theodore Roosevelt. Still, the party was groping its way toward acceptance of Roosevelt-style big-government progressivism. And the Wilson presidency completed that acceptance.

Something similar happened after 1932. Candidate Franklin Roosevelt, like Wilson in 1912, did not lay out a big-government, big-spending agenda. But once in office he moved aggressively in that direction.

Democrats have a tendency to be, shall we say, less than candid with the voters while campaigning. Consider candidate Biden in 2020. An open border and an energy shutdown were not exactly heavily promoted campaign promises.

So just what will the party do now that it is once again out of power? Will it regard this setback as just that — meaning a temporary setback? Or will Democrats act as though they have been cast into the political wilderness? In other words, will they rethink and retool or will they not? We’ll see.

The early returns, meaning candidate Harris’ concession speech, suggest that no serious rethinking is necessary. But losing again to Donald Trump should suggest a different approach. It’s one thing to lose to a normal Republican, meaning the sort of Republican that Democrats normally have for lunch. It’s quite something else to lose to someone whom Democrats regard as an empty-headed, foul-mouthed, combination showman, racist and fascist. Such a defeat should lead to some serious rethinking.

It certainly ought to make good sense for Democrats to take a second look at things and then to entertain some serious second thoughts. Let me suggest that Democrats should think of Trump as something other than any of the epithets listed above. They should think of the president-elect as the anti-Woodrow Wilson, which in many respects is just what he is.

A second Trump presidency is not going to add more layers to an already overlayered bureaucracy. A re-elected Trump is not going to build onto the edifice of the big-government progressivism initiated by Theodore Roosevelt and then expanded upon by Woodrow Wilson. If anything, he is likely going to try to eliminate some of that edifice, beginning perhaps with the Department of Education.

Given his own experience during the height of COVID, Trump is not likely to adopt Harris’ Wilsonian-style pledge to rely on the “experts.” If anything, he is going to begin the long process of restoring constitutional government, rather than government by bureaucratic edict.

In addition, there will be no Trumpian crusades to match the Wilsonian crusade to “make the world safe for democracy.” Therefore, there will likely be no Wilsonian-style move to shut down domestic wartime dissent. If anything, there will be an effort to restore debate, because there likely will be action against any attempt to shut down debate on our college campuses.

What’s a good Democrat to do in the face of all this? Well, the Democrats have some searching questions to ask of one another. And then they have important decisions to make. One key question to answer is this: Are we essentially a liberal party or a leftist party?

As things stand now, Democrats campaign as liberals, then try to govern as leftists. This façade needs to end. Just ask Bernie Sanders and his supporters. It’s time either to emerge from the political closet and campaign in the mold of Sen. Sanders or return to the model of Hubert Humphrey. The choice is theirs to make, and making such a monumental decision may take a good while to resolve.

At least one more critical decision needs to be made as well. Should Democrats keep trying to appeal to voters as members of various groups, whether they be identity groups or victim groups or both? Or should they take a page from the allegedly divisive Trump and appeal to voters as fellow Americans?

In the meantime, a successful second Trump administration has an opportunity to restore America as a successful commercial republic, thereby leaving Sanders-style politicking and governance somewhere in the rearview mirror. It also has an opportunity to end the virtual 50-50 split/cycle in recent presidential elections and establish one-party dominance for a period of time longer than, say, eight years. Ironically, this is precisely what William McKinley did in 1896 when he followed what’s-his-name into the White House. Oh, that would be Grover Cleveland, or that other president who served nonconsecutive terms.

In any case, the question of the moment remains on the table: What’s a good Democrat to do in the aftermath of this defeat? Welcome to what seems to be shaping up as your wilderness years, Democrats.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2024, 07:24:36 PM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 3225
    • View Profile
Re: Political Rants & interesting thought pieces
« Reply #2419 on: November 19, 2024, 07:30:32 PM »
I see Cpt. Obvious made an appearance in the piece Doug posted above, and somehow managed to grossly under-connote the vastness of the issue:

“Democrats have a tendency to be, shall we say, less than candid with the voters while campaigning. Consider candidate Biden in 2020. An open border and an energy shutdown were not exactly heavily promoted campaign promises.”

Oh well, guess it counts as grappling with raw reality nonetheless.