Fire Hydrant of Freedom

This risk is not worth it. Vote no.

It would require a constitutional amendment that allows a third term. No way would even Republicans vote for that. No way would Democrats vote for that and it would require 2/3 of the House, Senate and 3/4 of the state legislatures.

But I didn't think of this: The amendment would allow Barack Obama to run for a third term too. Heavyweight title bout. Democrats have no one else., as shown when they picked Biden, Harris, Walz. Run one of those again? Run someone new who's never been at that level again? No, run the tried and true.

Yes Trump is bluffing. Obama would never go for this, would he? But this is howto run Obama out of Washington once and for all. Call him out. If you want to run the country get your people and get this passed and ratified. Just to have this kicking around takes away a little bit of Trump's lame duck status.

Who would Obama pick as a running mate, Joe again? And who would he pick for first lady?

They worry about our project 2025. We should worry about their plans. This one I heard from a Minnesota State senator, to be rid of private automobiles by 2040.

I can't find it in writing but this story give some context.

https://thenewurbanorder.substack.com/p/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-private-end-of-private&ved=2ahUKEwjJ6PyP17WMAxWrAjQIHYw1KL8QFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3LOj6r6c5DT51xyL37Am-0

https://vladtepesblog.com/2025/03/27/mark-carney-and-the-century-initiative-the-ngo-determined-to-deracinate-canadian-identity-in-every-way-for-all-time/

and, FWIW

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/canadian-liberal-pm-mark-carney-under-fire-resurfaced/

Canada is going from population 40 million to population 100 million through immigration? From where? Maybe Trump is not ahead of his time with the border issue.

Butch Paxton  · 4h  ·
Read it!
Leanna Knapp
March 28 at 4:44 PM  ·


It's incredibly sad to me that people will not do the research into why decisions are made by our Government and/or President.  Because of their hatred for him and their political affiliation they are blinded by what's truly taken place. 

When it comes to the termination of a 157 year old relationship with Canada that people are so appalled over, take a good look at what actually happened and lead to the breakdown. 

President Trump asked Canada to close their border to narcotraffickers. The Canadian govt chose not to.

President Trump asked the Canadian government to remove trade tariffs, remove non-tariff trade barriers, and initiate reciprocal trade.  The Canadian govt chose not to.

President Trump asked the Canadian govt to stop being a pass-through for Chinese goods that violates the USMCA.  The Canadian govt chose not to.

President Trump asked the Canadian govt to open access to U.S. banks and financial services.  The Canadian govt said no.

President Trump asked the Canadian govt to live up to the NATO commitment of 2.5% GDP spending on military defense.  The Canadian govt said no, you will defend us free of charge and basically just accept it.

Now, members of the Canadian government are saying they want to "inflict the maximum amount of pain on Americans possible."

Canada destroyed most of their heavy industry and chases the climate change hoax in all economic policies.  They are destroying themselves.

Canada imported Steel and Aluminum from China, then shipped it into the USA, undercutting U.S. industry and trying to weaken U.S. heavy industry to match their own level of dependence.  President Trump said ENOUGH!

Because President Trump is holding them accountable and asking them to contribute equally or pay the tariffs, they are mad.  Because President Trump is trying to protect and help America, you are mad?
Come on now people, stop focusing on political BS and look at the big picture.  Really do your research and look into all the facts.