Author Topic: Anti-semitism & Jews  (Read 442037 times)

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #701 on: February 14, 2019, 03:15:20 PM »
just flippant talk

nothing more here folks



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19462
    • View Profile
Rahm Emmanuel v. Ilhan Omar's anti-Semitism
« Reply #706 on: March 07, 2019, 10:51:22 AM »
My first time posting wisdom from this famous and powerful man.  Good for him for speaking out and naming names.  I wonder if he knew that his party would back off from rebuking her when he wrote this.

There is another party that agrees with him on respect for our good ally Israel and respect for American Jews.  Everyone welcome.  Did I previously mention the irony of American Muslims sharing a political party with America's gays and Jews.  What could possibly go wrong?

To display his Leftist credentials, he includes a lie-hate-slam against Trump that Trump thinks all Muslims are terrorists.  That kind of hate lie bigotry is different than what he is writing about because shut up.

People like Rahm think Omar needs to be 'educated' but she already is.  She was raised to hate Jews, Israel and America as we know it.  Getting her to stop saying what she truly believes, now that she is here legally (via immigration fraud), is un-American.  The problem isn't that people like her hate Israel and hate Jews; it is that the Democrats of Minneapolis area including a major Jewish community vote for people like her - thinking that makes them "inclusive".  Inclusive is to respect the right of people like Omar to run for office and openly express her hatred but to vote for someone who doesn't.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/03/ilhan-omars-dual-loyalty-charge-was-anti-semitic/584314/
« Last Edit: March 07, 2019, 11:41:40 AM by DougMacG »



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19462
    • View Profile
Stephens, NYT, Omar, Anti-semitism, The Left Legitimizes Hate
« Reply #710 on: March 08, 2019, 08:51:48 AM »
Her bigotry including the 2012 tweet was fully covered up through her election. Before November, only Scott Johnson at Powerline and us were covering the extremist that Minneapolis thought appropriate to replace Keith Ellison in the US House of Representatives.  Now it's in the NYT for all my liberal friends to see.  Never Trumper Bret Stephens isn't buying the story that she just didn't understand the weight of her words.
 
 NYTIMES.COM › 
Ilhan Omar Knows Exactly What She Is Doing
BRET STEPHENS MARCH 07, 2019

There’s an old joke about upper-class British anti-Semitism: It means someone who hates Jews more than is strictly necessary. Ilhan Omar, the freshman representative from Minnesota, more than meets the progressive American version of that standard.

Like many self-described progressives, Omar does not like Israel. That’s a shame, not least because Israel is the only country in its region that embraces the sorts of values the Democratic Party claims to champion. When was the last time there was a gay-pride parade in Ramallah, a women’s rights march in Gaza, or an opposition press in Tehran? In what Middle Eastern country other than Israel can an attorney general indict a popular and powerful prime minister on corruption charges?

But America is a free country, and Omar is within her rights to think what she will about Israel or any other state. Contrary to a self-serving myth among Israel’s detractors, there’s rarely a social or reputational penalty for publicly criticizing Israeli policies today. It’s ubiquitous on college campuses and commonplace in editorial pages. And contrary to some recent comments from Senator Elizabeth Warren, no serious person claims criticism of Israel is ipso facto anti-Semitic. My last column called on Benjamin Netanyahu to resign. Last I checked, the Anti-Defamation League has not denounced me.

Omar, however, isn’t just a critic of Israel. As the joke has it, her objections to the Jewish state go well beyond what’s strictly necessary.

“Israel has hypnotized the world,” she tweeted in 2012. “May Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.” Last month, she wrote that U.S. support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins baby.” A few weeks after that, she told an audience in D.C. that “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is O.K. to push for allegiance to a foreign country.” Confronted with criticism about the remark from her fellow Democrat Nita Lowey, she replied: “I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee.”

Under intense pressure, Omar recanted those first two tweets. But she’s standing her ground on her more recent comments. It’s a case study in the ease with which strident criticism of Israel shades into anti-Semitism.

For those who don’t get it, claims that Israel “hypnotizes” the world, or that it uses money to bend others to its will, or that its American supporters “push for allegiance to a foreign country,” repackage falsehoods commonly used against Jews for centuries. People can debate the case for Israel on the merits, but people who supports the state should have to face allegations that their sympathies have been purchased, or their brain hijacked, or their loyalties divided.

It’s also a case study in the insidious cunning and latent power of anti-Jewish bigotry— proof that anti-Semitism is not, after all, merely the socialism of fools. Omar, I suspect, knows exactly what she is doing. She pleads ignorance when it suits her, saying she was unaware that her references to hypnosis and “Benjamins” might be considered offensive. Or she wraps herself in the flag, sounding almost like Pat Buchanan when he called Congress “Israeli-occupied” territory. Or she invokes free speech, telling Lowey “our democracy is built on debate” — as if the debate she wants to force is as innocuous as a dispute over a spending bill.

As the criticism of Omar mounts, it becomes that much easier for her to seem like the victim of a smear campaign, rather than the instigator of a smear. The secret of anti-Semitism has always rested, in part, on creating the perception that the anti-Semite is, in fact, the victim of the Jews and their allies. Just which powers-that-be are orchestrating that campaign? Why are they afraid of open debate? And what about all the bigotry on their side?

The goal is not to win the argument, at least not anytime soon. Yet merely by refusing to fold, Omar stands to shift the range of acceptable discussion — the so-called Overton window — sharply in her direction. Ideas once thought of as intellectually uncouth and morally repulsive have suddenly become merely controversial. It’s how anti-Zionism has abruptly become an acceptable point of view in reputable circles. It’s why anti-Semitism is just outside the frame, bidding to get in.

House Democrats are now wrangling over the text of a resolution that was initially intended as a condemnation of anti-Semitism, with Omar as its implicit target. At this writing it is mired in predictable controversy, as members of the party’s progressive wing and black caucus rally to Omar’s side in the first open challenge to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s leadership. In the Senate, the presidential hopefuls Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders and Warren have weighed in with statements that painted Omar as a victim of Islamophobia — which she is — without mentioning that she’s also a purveyor of anti-Semitic bigotry — which she surely is as well.

It says something about the progressive movement today that it has no trouble denouncing Republican racism, real and alleged, every day of the week but has so much trouble calling out naked anti-Semite in its own ranks. This is how progressivism becomes Corbynism. It’s how the left finds its own path toward legitimizing hate. It’s how self-declared anti-fascists develop their own forms of fascism.

If Pelosi can’t muster a powerful and unequivocal resolution condemning anti-Semitism, then Omar will have secured her political future and won a critical battle for the soul of the Democratic Party. At that point, the days when American Jews can live comfortably within the Democratic fold will be numbered.

 https://outline.com/VryxtZ


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19462
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #712 on: March 10, 2019, 11:53:43 AM »
The neglect of the local media to scutinize, vet her is a big part of why we have a "firebrand" like representative Omar in power.  Star Tribune ignored her affiliations with terror fund raising. Now they say Representative Omar is unfairly being singled out for her [justifiable?] anti-semitism.

http://m.startribune.com/ilhan-omar-s-actions-fuel-fresh-doubts-divisions-in-her-district/506932182/

In a morally relativistic world, is it "extreme" to agree with all the Middle East that Israel is evil and all Jews should be exterminated?  To take it a step further for people on the side of Osama bin Laden, if Israel is the problem and America is the enabler, destroying America is rational and doing it from within is the most cost effective way. 

I just wish she would disclose all her views (below) on her campaign literature for voters to consider.

"I will achieve a bold, progressive agenda—where we have Medicare for All, tuition- and debt-free college, housing as a human right, a clean environment for future generations, and elections that cannot be bought."
https://www.ilhanomar.com/

And I will fund peace loving organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah that attack evil places like Israel and western civilization.  Peace to those who choose the path [of Jihad].  Death to all others.  Love, heart and smiley face, Ilhan.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2019, 01:21:10 PM by DougMacG »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #713 on: March 10, 2019, 02:11:08 PM »
Strange, I was under the impression that when we imported 3rd world savages to the west, the magic soil of the west made them into nice, tolerant people, not to say that Somalia isn't internationally known for it's niceness and tolerance. In fact, I think relocating the UN to Mogadishu would be good for everyone!


The neglect of the local media to scutinize, vet her is a big part of why we have a "firebrand" like representative Omar in power.  Star Tribune ignored her affiliations with terror fund raising. Now they say Representative Omar is unfairly being singled out for her [justifiable?] anti-semitism.

http://m.startribune.com/ilhan-omar-s-actions-fuel-fresh-doubts-divisions-in-her-district/506932182/

In a morally relativistic world, is it "extreme" to agree with all the Middle East that Israel is evil and all Jews should be exterminated?  To take it a step further for people on the side of Osama bin Laden, if Israel is the problem and America is the enabler, destroying America is rational and doing it from within is the most cost effective way. 

I just wish she would disclose all her views (below) on her campaign literature for voters to consider.

"I will achieve a bold, progressive agenda—where we have Medicare for All, tuition- and debt-free college, housing as a human right, a clean environment for future generations, and elections that cannot be bought."
https://www.ilhanomar.com/

And I will fund peace loving organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah that attack evil places like Israel and western civilization.  Peace to those who choose the path [of Jihad].  Death to all others.  Love, heart and smiley face, Ilhan.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Only 51 % of jews call themselves crats??

weird.  So who will 31 % who call themselves independent vote for, Schultz? - i guarantee it won't be a conservative.
they are all libs except for the minority of us including myself:

Gallup: 51% of Jews identify as Democrats, 16% as Republicans
MARCH 14, 2019 8:53 AM

A voter shown casting a ballot in Kent, Ohio, Nov. 6, 2018. (Jeff Swensen/Getty Images)

(JTA) — About half of American Jews identified as Democrats in Gallup polls in 2018.

Some 52 percent of American Jews identified as Democrat, 16 percent as Republican and 31 as independent in combined Gallup tracking poll data for 2018, which encompassed over 75,000 interviews with U.S. adults, including 938 self-identified Jewish Americans.

Jews were the religious group with the highest percentage identifying as Democrats. By contrast, 30 percent of Catholics and 27 percent of Protestant and other Christians identified as Democrats, as well as 29 percent of all Americans.

Meanwhile, Gallup polling found that Jewish Americans were among the least likely in 2018 to approve of President Donald Trump of all religious groups in 2018, with just 26 percent approving and 71 percent disapproving.

By contrast, 50 percent of Protestants and other Christians, and 61 percent of Mormons approved of Trump’s performance, compared to 40 percent of all Americans.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Roger Simon
« Reply #718 on: March 22, 2019, 07:00:40 AM »
From PJ Media .  previously I just read "Pajama Media"

He wonders if we will see a shift in Jewish political allegiance .  My thoughts are we may see a few who may change but none of the ones I know of are any different:

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/american-jews-on-the-brink-of-civil-war/
Roger was a typical Liberal American Jew until he realized otherwise:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_L._Simon




ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #722 on: April 28, 2019, 02:55:11 PM »
"It's very surprising that the party of Sharpton, Obama and Wright has gone all in on antisemitism!"

That is because the liberal jews let them!

don't think any of the Democrat Jews they will vote Republican now.

And they won't stay home either.
They will do their duty and be good Democrats - because they are for the poor.

The party takes the Jews )along with their money for granted)
You think the likes of Schiff Nadler Maher are going to admit they are wrong ?

Dumb asses are giving their country away and being taken for granted by the Dem candidates just
like they do with the Blacks.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile
Bret Stephens rips Pravda on the Hudson a new anus
« Reply #723 on: April 28, 2019, 08:35:33 PM »
A Despicable Cartoon in The Times

The paper of record needs to reflect deeply on how it came to publish anti-Semitic propaganda.
Bret Stephens

By Bret Stephens

Opinion Columnist

    April 28, 2019

As prejudices go, anti-Semitism can sometimes be hard to pin down, but on Thursday the opinion pages of The New York Times international edition provided a textbook illustration of it.

Except that The Times wasn’t explaining anti-Semitism. It was purveying it.

It did so in the form of a cartoon, provided to the newspaper by a wire service and published directly above an unrelated column by Tom Friedman, in which a guide dog with a prideful countenance and the face of Benjamin Netanyahu leads a blind, fat Donald Trump wearing dark glasses and a black yarmulke. Lest there be any doubt as to the identity of the dog-man, it wears a collar from which hangs a Star of David.

Here was an image that, in another age, might have been published in the pages of Der Stürmer. The Jew in the form of a dog. The small but wily Jew leading the dumb and trusting American. The hated Trump being Judaized with a skullcap. The nominal servant acting as the true master. The cartoon checked so many anti-Semitic boxes that the only thing missing was a dollar sign.

The image also had an obvious political message: Namely, that in the current administration, the United States follows wherever Israel wants to go. This is false — consider Israel’s horrified reaction to Trump’s announcement last year that he intended to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria — but it’s beside the point. There are legitimate ways to criticize Trump’s approach to Israel, in pictures as well as words. But there was nothing legitimate about this cartoon.

So what was it doing in The Times?

For some Times readers — or, as often, former readers — the answer is clear: The Times has a longstanding Jewish problem, dating back to World War II, when it mostly buried news about the Holocaust, and continuing into the present day in the form of intensely adversarial coverage of Israel. The criticism goes double when it comes to the editorial pages, whose overall approach toward the Jewish state tends to range, with some notable exceptions, from tut-tutting disappointment to thunderous condemnation.

For these readers, the cartoon would have come like the slip of the tongue that reveals the deeper institutional prejudice. What was long suspected is, at last, revealed.

The real story is a bit different, though not in ways that acquit The Times. The cartoon appeared in the print version of the international edition, which has a limited overseas circulation, a much smaller staff, and far less oversight than the regular edition. Incredibly, the cartoon itself was selected and seen by just one midlevel editor right before the paper went to press.

An initial editor’s note acknowledged that the cartoon “included anti-Semitic tropes,” “was offensive,” and that “it was an error of judgment to publish it.” On Sunday, The Times issued an additional statement saying it was “deeply sorry” for the cartoon and that “significant changes” would be made in terms of internal processes and training.

In other words, the paper’s position is that it is guilty of a serious screw-up but not a cardinal sin. Not quite.
Editors’ Picks
Diary of a Song: Watch Lizzo Make ‘Juice,’ a Pop Anthem as Irresistible as She Is
It’s Not You, It’s Men
Wait, Is That Another Ad for Egg Freezing?

The problem with the cartoon isn’t that its publication was a willful act of anti-Semitism. It wasn’t. The problem is that its publication was an astonishing act of ignorance of anti-Semitism — and that, at a publication that is otherwise hyper-alert to nearly every conceivable expression of prejudice, from mansplaining to racial microaggressions to transphobia.

Imagine, for instance, if the dog on a leash in the image hadn’t been the Israeli prime minister but instead a prominent woman such as Nancy Pelosi, a person of color such as John Lewis, or a Muslim such as Ilhan Omar. Would that have gone unnoticed by either the wire service that provides the Times with images or the editor who, even if he were working in haste, selected it?

The question answers itself. And it raises a follow-on: How have even the most blatant expressions of anti-Semitism become almost undetectable to editors who think it’s part of their job to stand up to bigotry?

The reason is the almost torrential criticism of Israel and the mainstreaming of anti-Zionism, including by this paper, which has become so common that people have been desensitized to its inherent bigotry. So long as anti-Semitic arguments or images are framed, however speciously, as commentary about Israel, there will be a tendency to view them as a form of political opinion, not ethnic prejudice. But as I noted in a Sunday Review essay in February, anti-Zionism is all but indistinguishable from anti-Semitism in practice and often in intent, however much progressives try to deny this.

Add to the mix the media’s routine demonization of Netanyahu, and it is easy to see how the cartoon came to be drawn and published: Already depicted as a malevolent Jewish leader, it’s just a short step to depict him as a malevolent Jew.

I’m writing this column conscious of the fact that it is unusually critical of the newspaper in which it appears, and it is a credit to the paper that it is publishing it. I have now been with The Times for two years and I’m certain that the charge that the institution is in any way anti-Semitic is a calumny.

But the publication of the cartoon isn’t just an “error of judgment,” either. The paper owes the Israeli prime minister an apology. It owes itself some serious reflection as to how it came to publish that cartoon — and how its publication came, to many longtime readers, as a shock but not a surprise.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
Sign Up for The Privacy Project Newsletter

As technology advances, will it continue to blur the lines between public and private? Explore what's at stake and what you can do about it.

Bret L. Stephens has been an Opinion columnist with The Times since April 2017. He won a Pulitzer Prize for commentary at The Wall Street Journal in 2013 and was previously editor in chief of The Jerusalem Post. @BretStephensNYT • Facebook

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19462
    • View Profile
Re: Bret Stephens rips Pravda on the Hudson a new anus
« Reply #724 on: April 29, 2019, 07:20:30 AM »
Amazing that the most prominent criticism of this New York Times' mistake was published in the New York Times.

Isn't this the exact same point Representative Omar just made and Democrats refused to single out and condemn?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2019, 08:11:24 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #725 on: May 01, 2019, 05:25:38 AM »
" .A Despicable Cartoon in The Times"

What is even more weird is the NYT is controlled by Jews since 1896. ( which is what I thought but just confirmed)


F rom Wikipedia :   "The paper is owned by The New York Times Company, which is publicly traded and is controlled by the Sulzberger family through a dual-class share structure.[11] It has been owned by the family since 1896; A.G. Sulzberger, the paper's publisher, and his father, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., the company's chairman, are the fourth and fifth generation of the family to helm the paper.[12]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times

Which confirms what I have posted for years.
Lib Jews are more in love with their Democrat Party then their own religion.

To them everything and everyone is a dichotomy :

Democrats vs Evil or Nazis

Their political party is their new religion.






ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Levin
« Reply #727 on: May 04, 2019, 12:19:02 PM »
1/2 hr discussion on NYT history of anti semitism
and more.  Worth the time.  I learned a few things I did not know  like the NYT cover up or the Stalin caused famine in Ukraine as well as the cover up of concentration camps in WWII

I wondered if NYT is trying not to be a shill for Jews and instead is trying to appear not pro Jew. 

In any case hard to believe Jewish controlled newspaper is this way.
And Wash compost the same.
Mark states , as I have here for yrs . for lib Jews, the  Democrat Party is first and foremost:

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/levin-new-york-times-complicit-rise-anti-semitism-almost-century/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
news that reflects anti-semitism
« Reply #728 on: May 05, 2019, 12:20:11 PM »
What does the fact that one might get matzo ball soup and have access to a rabbi have anything to do with anything here?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-former-lawyer-heads-u-prison-offers-matzo-100246226.html



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #730 on: May 11, 2019, 10:41:08 AM »



*******https://www.reallyamerican.com/white-supremacists-chant-six-million-more-after-crashing-holocaust-remembrance-day-event-in-arkansas-405?fbclid=IwAR2ydS2CPcr7bX8N6fSou1eBF21fHYM02Btks7QNbXXyT5-tFraT6F-1nNA*******

Clearly bad but for some reason news media without exception always show close ups of such protestors making it look like it is  some huge demonstration when in reality it maybe no more than 10 to 20 people if that many.



G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #732 on: May 11, 2019, 06:44:54 PM »



*******https://www.reallyamerican.com/white-supremacists-chant-six-million-more-after-crashing-holocaust-remembrance-day-event-in-arkansas-405?fbclid=IwAR2ydS2CPcr7bX8N6fSou1eBF21fHYM02Btks7QNbXXyT5-tFraT6F-1nNA*******

Clearly bad but for some reason news media without exception always show close ups of such protestors making it look like it is  some huge demonstration when in reality it maybe no more than 10 to 20 people if that many.

The dems have more anti-semites than that serving in congress...



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Jews abused in Arab lands
« Reply #734 on: May 23, 2019, 05:45:44 AM »
https://www.thejc.com/culture/features/the-jews-driven-out-of-homes-in-arab-lands-1.448713?fbclid=IwAR0oS2MgpiWCdrXFvu8tkePg0lXRRRNdfBEMX79h9hzJ11me7uyqJL3YaiY

but wait ,

I thought as per members of US Congress , we were given history lessons that  Jews were welcome in Arab lands and offered safe haven.
( if these Congress members spoke of Blacks this way they would be run out of DC !)

1/3 of Bagdadians were Jewish in 1939!!!  :-o









ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Spanish River High School Principle
« Reply #740 on: July 09, 2019, 09:02:05 AM »
cannot verify the Holocaust occurred

in Boca Raton (which is 70+ % Jews - I lived there for 3 yrs):

https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/schools/fl-ne-william-latson-comments-20190708-cm5wzlw4lrayrl5y2r3vljxhnu-story.html

LOL

That would be like me going to teach in Harlem and claim I cannot verify there was ever slavery in the US.  I'd be dead before I left the room.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19462
    • View Profile
Re: Spanish River High School Principal
« Reply #741 on: July 09, 2019, 10:18:33 AM »
"cannot verify the Holocaust occurred"

To paraphrase Captain Von Trapp, the principal suffers from a deplorable lack of curiosity if he she zhe cannot verify the Holocaust occurred. I am far from unique in having known two eyewitnesses, my father and his war buddy who I met with after my dad passed.  They were both first responders at Buchenwald. To quote Lenny Woods, everyone that lived near it knew what was happening by the smell.  He named a Jewish member of their unit who vomited uncontrollably as they approached through the stench of human incineration.

Yeah maybe it didn't occur...

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Can Ilhan Omar overcome her prejudice?
« Reply #742 on: July 13, 2019, 09:14:17 AM »

Can Ilhan Omar Overcome Her Prejudice?
I was born in Somalia and grew up amid pervasive Muslim anti-Semitism. Hate is hard to unlearn without coming to terms with how you learned it.
By Ayaan Hirsi Ali
July 12, 2019 6:24 pm ET
Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar at a news conference in Washington, April 10. Photo: jim bourg/Reuters

I once opened a speech by confessing to a crowd of Jews that I used to hate them. It was 2006 and I was a young native of Somalia who’d been elected to the Dutch Parliament. The American Jewish Committee was giving me its Moral Courage Award. I felt honored and humbled, but a little dishonest if I didn’t own up to my anti-Semitic past. So I told them how I’d learned to blame the Jews for everything.

Fast-forward to 2019. A freshman congresswoman from Minnesota has been infuriating the Jewish community and discomfiting the Democratic leadership with her expressions of anti-Semitism. Like me, Ilhan Omar was born in Somalia and exposed at an early age to Muslim anti-Semitism.

Some of the members of my 2006 AJC audience have asked me to explain and respond to Ms. Omar’s comments, including her equivocal apologies. Their main question is whether it is possible for Ms. Omar to unlearn her evident hatred of Jews—and if so, how to help.

In my experience it is difficult, perhaps impossible, to unlearn hate without coming to terms with how you learned to hate. Most Americans are familiar with the classic Western flavors of anti-Semitism: the Christian, European, white-supremacist and Communist types. But little attention has been paid to the special case of Muslim anti-Semitism. That is a pity because today it is anti-Semitism’s most zealous, most potent and most underestimated form.

I never heard the term “anti-Semitism” until I moved to the Netherlands in my 20s. But I had firsthand familiarity with its Muslim variety. As a child in Somalia, I was a passive consumer of anti-Semitism. Things would break, conflicts would arise, shortages would occur—and adults would blame it all on the Jews.

When I was a little girl, my mom often lost her temper with my brother, with the grocer or with a neighbor. She would scream or curse under her breath “Yahud!” followed by a description of the hostility, ignominy or despicable behavior of the subject of her wrath. It wasn’t just my mother; grown-ups around me exclaimed “Yahud!” the way Americans use the F-word. I was made to understand that Jews—Yahud—were all bad. No one took any trouble to build a rational framework around the idea—hardly necessary, since there were no Jews around. But it set the necessary foundation for the next phase of my development.

At 15 I became an Islamist by joining the Muslim Brotherhood. I began attending religious and civil-society events, where I received an education in the depth and breadth of Jewish villainy. This was done in two ways.

The first was theological. We were taught that the Jews betrayed our prophet Muhammad. Through Quranic verses (such as 7:166, 2:65 and 5:60), we learned that Allah had eternally condemned them, that they were not human but descendants of pigs and monkeys, that we should aspire to kill them wherever we found them. We were taught to pray: “Dear God, please destroy the Jews, the Zionists, the state of Israel. Amen.”

We were taught that the Jews occupied the Holy Land of Palestine. We were shown pictures of mutilated bodies, dead children, wailing widows and weeping orphans. Standing over them in military uniform were Israeli soldiers with large guns. We were told their killing of Palestinians was wanton, unprovoked and an expression of their hatred for Muslims.

The theological and the political stories were woven together, as in the Hamas charter: “The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said: ‘The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The Stones and trees will say, “O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill me.” ’ . . . There is no solution for the Palestine question except through Jihad.”

That combination of narratives is the essence of Muslim anti-Semitism. Mohammed Morsi, the longtime Muslim Brotherhood leader who died June 17 but was president of Egypt for a year beginning in 2012, urged in 2010: “We must never forget, brothers, to nurse our children and our grandchildren on hatred for them: for Zionists, for Jews”—two categories that tend to merge along with allegations of world domination.

European anti-Semitism is also a mixture. Medieval Christian antipathy toward “Christ killers” blended with radical critiques of capitalism in the 19th century and racial pseudoscience in the 20th. But before the Depression, anti-Semitic parties were not mass parties. Nor have they been since World War II. Muslim anti-Semitism has a broader base, and its propagators have had the time and resources to spread it widely.

To see how, begin at the top. Most men (and the odd woman) in power in Muslim-majority countries are autocrats. Even where there are elections, corrupt rulers play an intricate game to stay in power. Their signature move is the promise to “free” the Holy Land—that is, to eliminate the Jewish state. The rulers of Iran are explicit about this goal. Other Muslim leaders may pay lip service to the peace process and the two-state solution, but government anti-Semitism is frequently on display at the United Nations, where Israel is repeatedly compared to apartheid South Africa, accused of genocide and demonized as racist.

Media also play their part. There is very little freedom of expression in Muslim-majority countries, and state-owned media churn out anti-Semitic and anti-Israel propaganda daily—as do even media groups that style themselves as critical of Muslim autocracies, such as Al Jazeera and Al-Manar.

Then there are the mosques, madrassas and other religious institutions. Schools in general, especially college campuses, have been an Islamist stronghold for generations in Muslim-majority countries. That matters because graduates go on to leadership positions in the professions, media, government and other institutions.

Refugee camps are another zone of indoctrination. They are full of vulnerable people, and Islamists prey on them. They come offering food, tents and first aid, followed by education. They establish madrassas in the camps, then indoctrinate the kids with a message that consists in large part of hatred for Jews and rejection of Israel.

Perhaps—I do not know—this is what happened to Ms. Omar in the four years she spent in a refugee camp in Kenya as a child. Or perhaps she became acquainted with Islamist anti-Semitism in Minnesota, where her family settled when she was 12. In any case, her preoccupation with the Jews and Israel would otherwise be hard to explain.

Spreading anti-Semitism through all these channels is no trivial matter—and this brings us to the question of resources. “It’s all about the Benjamins baby,” Ms. Omar tweeted in February, implying that American politicians support Israel only because of Jewish financial contributions. The irony is that the resources available to propagate Islamist ideologies, with their attendant anti-Semitism, vastly exceed what pro-Israel groups spend in the U.S. Since the early 1970s the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has spent vast sums to spread Wahhabi Islam abroad. Much of this funding is opaque, but estimates of the cumulative sum run as high as $100 billion.

Thousands of schools in Pakistan, funded with Saudi money, “teach a version of Islam that leads [to] anti-Western militancy,” according to Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy—and, one might add, to an anti-Semitic militancy.

In recent years the Saudi leadership has tried to turn away from supporting this type of religious radicalism. But increasingly Qatar seems to be taking over the Saudi role. In the U.S. alone, the Qatar Foundation has given $30.6 million over the past eight years to public schools, ostensibly for teaching Arabic and promoting cultural exchange.

For years, Qatar has hosted influential radical clerics such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and provided them with a global microphone, and the country’s school textbooks have been criticized for anti-Semitism. They present Jews as treacherous and crafty but also weak, wretched and cowardly; Islam is described as inherently superior. “The Grade 11 text discusses at length the issue of how non-Muslims should be treated,” the Middle East Media Research Institute reports. “It warns students not to form relationships with unbelievers, and emphasizes the principle of loyalty to Muslims and disavowal of unbelievers.”

The allegation that Jewish or Zionist money controls Congress is nonsensical. The Center for Responsive Politics estimates that the Israeli government has spent $34 million on lobbying in Washington since 2017. The Saudis and Qataris spent a combined $51 million during the same period. If we include foreign nongovernmental organizations, the pro-Israel lobbying figure rises to $63 million—less than the $68 million spent lobbying for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

In 2018 domestic American pro-Israeli lobbying—including but not limited to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or Aipac—totaled $5.1 million. No comparable figures are available for domestic pro-Islamist lobbying efforts. But as journalist Armin Rosen observes, Aipac’s 2018 total, at $3.5 million, was less than either the American Association of Airport Executives or the Association of American Railroads spent on lobbying. Aipac’s influence has more to do with the power of its arguments than the size of its wallet.

Now consider the demographics. Jews were a minority in Europe in the 1930s, but a substantial one, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. Today Jews are at a much greater disadvantage. For each Jew world-wide, there are 100 Muslims. In many European countries—including France, Germany, the Netherlands and the U.K.—the Muslim population far exceeds the Jewish population, and the gap is widening. American Jews still outnumber Muslims but won’t by 2050.

The problem of Muslim anti-Semitism is much bigger than Ilhan Omar. Condemning her, expelling her from the House Foreign Affairs Committee, or defeating her in 2020 won’t make the problem go away.

Islamists have understood well how to couple Muslim anti-Semitism with the American left’s vague notion of “social justice.” They have succeeded in couching their agenda in the progressive framework of the oppressed versus the oppressor. Identity politics and victimhood culture also provide Islamists with the vocabulary to deflect their critics with accusations of “Islamophobia,” “white privilege” and “insensitivity.” A perfect illustration was the way Ms. Omar and her allies were able to turn a House resolution condemning her anti-Semitism into a garbled “intersectional” rant in which Muslims emerged as the most vulnerable minority in the league table of victimhood.

As for me, I eventually unlearned my hatred of Jews, Zionists and Israel. As an asylum seeker turned student turned politician in Holland, I was exposed to a complex set of circumstances that led me to question my own prejudices. Perhaps I didn’t stay in the Islamist fold long enough for the indoctrination to stick. Perhaps my falling out with my parents and extended family after I left home led me to a wider reappraisal of my youthful beliefs. Perhaps it was my loss of religious faith.

In any event, I am living proof that one can be born a Somali, raised as an anti-Semite, indoctrinated as an anti-Zionist—and still overcome all this to appreciate the unique culture of Judaism and the extraordinary achievement of the state of Israel. If I can make that leap, so perhaps can Ms. Omar. Yet that is not really the issue at stake. For she and I are only two individuals. The real question is what, if anything, can be done to check the advance of the mass movement that is Muslim anti-Semitism. Absent a world-wide Muslim reformation, followed by an Islamic enlightenment, I am not sure I know.

Ms. Hirsi Ali is a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
thanks for post on Ayaan Hirsi Ali
« Reply #743 on: July 13, 2019, 10:11:51 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali

There is quite a lot about her.
In my mind she speaks the truth and is thus criticized for it in many circles
including the usual radical academics.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile
Anti-semite appointed to Anti-Discrim Commission
« Reply #744 on: July 27, 2019, 09:23:11 AM »


City of Champaign Appoints Anti-Jewish Extremist to Anti-Discrimination Commission
by Sam Westrop
Daily Wire
July 23, 2019
https://www.meforum.org/58999/city-of-champaign-appoints-anti-jewish-extremist

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile
Stratfor: Georgia, the great replacement, and larger implications
« Reply #745 on: September 01, 2019, 11:24:17 AM »
Really wish the Southern Poverty Law Center was not cited as a source.  That said, I find myself in a very weird position.  I am a Jew who believes in the Great Replacement Theory-- but for me it is not RACIAL but cultural.  America is not a race, America is a Creed.

The propaganda of the Goolag and the Pravdas now frontally attacks the very foundations of natural law and the American Creed.  "America was never that great" say Obama, Gov. Cuomo and others and the Big Lie of America being founded upon racism and slavery is pushed everywhere.

The apparent gathering storm of impending tragedy is that those attacked by the Goolag and the Pravdas have taken on its accusation of racism instead of defending themselves/us? as the Creed that we are.

The tremendous disparity in Jewish achievement and political power, aligned in great part as it is with the Goolag, provides fertile ground for the seeds of the Old Hatred.

==================================================

In Georgia, It's Open Season for the Far-Right
By Onnik James Krikorian

A young Georgian, right, wears a T-shirt with the Stormfront logo and the number 14/88 during a September 2016 rally. The number 14 denotes David Lane’s 14-word white supremacist mantra while 88, as the eighth letter of the alphabet, signifies HH, which stands for Heil Hitler.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)
Contributor Perspectives offer insight, analysis and commentary from Stratfor’s Board of Contributors and guest contributors who are distinguished leaders in their fields of expertise.

Highlights

    Georgia's far-right movement has been growing in recent years, presenting a dangerous threat to the Jewish, LGBTQ and other non-Georgian Orthodox communities.
    Despite a recent high-profile murder and campaigns of intimidation, the government has done little to halt the spread of far-right radicalization.
    Plans to implement proportional representation with no electoral threshold could allow far-right parties to grab a greater foothold in Parliament.

It should have been a night like any other for Vitali Safarov. The 25-year-old civil rights activist had gone to a bar in central Tbilisi to socialize when he got into an argument with two neo-Nazi gang members. The altercation soon took a fatal turn and, in the early hours of Sept. 30, 2018, 21-year-old Avtandil Kandelakishvili and 24-year-old Giorgi Sokhadze killed Safarov, stabbing him 10 times.

Sokhadze, better known to his acquaintances as "Slayer," was known to have fascist leanings while Kandelakishvili had a swastika tattoo. A key witness in their trial also testified that the pair made anti-Semitic remarks as they killed Safarov, who was of Jewish and Yazidi descent. Despite the attackers' racial epithets, the court failed to qualify Safarov's murder as a hate crime.

Ultimately, the court sentenced Kandelakishvili and Sokhadze to 15 years in prison in June. Safarov's family, however, intends to appeal the decision, with the victim's mother, Marina Alanakyan, noting her determination to understand why her son was killed and ensure the case sets an important precedent for punishing hate crimes in Georgia.

Others in civil society are just as eager to discover why the government and police have failed to address the increasingly visible problem of far-right radicalization in the country. Indeed, with authorities often turning a blind eye to far-right and neo-Nazi activities and an increasingly unpopular government opening the way for more ultraconservative groupings to enter Parliament and spread their views, Georgia stands on the verge of a shift much further to the right.

A Reality Ignored

To date, violent extremism in Georgia has been framed only in the context of the Islamic State, Syria and the country's minority Muslim population. Even so, there are few effective projects to counter violent extremism in Georgia — none of which deal with far-right disengagement or deradicalization.

The Tolerance and Diversity Institute, for example, noted in a press release less than two weeks after Safarov's murder that neo-Nazi groups had been active around Tbilisi's Freedom Square for at least a year, specifically targeting bars frequented by tourists and other foreigners. Moreover, they alleged that police consistently failed to respond to complaints, including those involving the two neo-Nazis responsible for Safarov's murder.

"This was a truly tragic and fatal result of unpunished hate crimes around us," said Agit Mirzoev, who works for the Center for Participation and Democracy, where Safarov once worked. "We have been systematically talking about the dangers of (far-right) radicalization for the last four or five years, but neither the public nor the government has displayed a proper response to these concerns."

In fact, it was only when Georgians awoke to the news of the Christchurch mosque massacres in March and saw photographs of Georgian script — along with Cyrillic, Armenian and Latin — scrawled on the shooter's weapons that many began to worry about the possible connection between the Georgian far-right and radicals overseas. One of the names inscribed on attacker Brenton Tarrant's armaments was that of David the Builder, the Georgian king who led Georgian forces to victory over the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Didgori in 1121. David, his flag and 1121 have all become touchstones for far-right groups like the Georgian March, whose members have made the king's unicorn flag their main symbol and begun to wear T-shirts bearing the date of the Battle of Didgori.

Two women members of the far-right Georgian March wear T-shirts featuring an image of Georgian King David the Builder crossing himself and the year of 1121, when Georgians defeated the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Didgori. 1121 has now become an important symbol for ultranationalists.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Immediately following the New Zealand massacres, the Georgian government vowed to investigate any possible links between the country's neo-Nazis and far-right militants abroad. Since then, however, there has been no progress.

The Christchurch attacker's manifesto appeared to borrow heavily from that of Anders Breivik, the far-right terrorist who killed 77 people, including a Georgian, in a bomb attack in Oslo and a massacre on Utoya island in Norway in July 2011. Both Breivik and Tarrant appear to have been fascinated with Georgia and other Christian countries that shared a historical enmity with Muslims. Both, too, were obsessed with the "Great Replacement," a far-right conspiracy theory that non-Europeans are taking the place of white Europeans. Today, the Great Replacement is a key narrative among far-right groups in Georgia and elsewhere.

One Georgian site, MyStar, even translated the works of David Lane, a member of the U.S. domestic terrorist organization the Order, into Georgian. In the wider world, Lane is better known for his 14 words, "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children," which has become a mantra for white supremacists and neo-Nazis the world over. Meanwhile, another MyStar post quoted the Old Testament to justify the execution of children in Nazi Germany. The site did not renew its hosting at the beginning of this year, and the domain is now used to sell wallets and handbags.

Nevertheless, other sites continue to post similar content. One such group is the neo-Nazi Georgian Power, which is prolific in its dissemination of alt-right memes depicting Pepe the Frog, references to the red and blue pills from "The Matrix" (which has been appropriated by the far-right), and patriarchal images of "pure" women. It has also adopted Lane's 14 words as a Georgian hashtag on Facebook.

Most recently, ultra-conservative and nationalist groups such as the neo-Nazi National Unity and the populist Georgian March have also stepped up their activities. In May last year, both groups converged on the Georgian Parliament to face off with nightclub patrons who were protesting a particularly heavy-handed police raid on the city's famous Bassiani Club.
Sandro Bregadze, the founder of the far-right populist Georgian March, instructs his supporters to break through police lines to attack a demonstration staged by young Georgians against heavy-handed anti-drug police raids on the Bassiani nightclub in March 2018.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Despite the show of force, neither Sandro Bregadze (Georgian March's leader) nor Giorgi Chelidze (the head of National Unity) faced any changes at the time. In fact, it was only in September 2018 that authorities prosecuted Chelidze for the illegal possession of munitions — an act that came to light after he posted a video on Facebook of himself and others training with semi-automatic weapons. In the trial that followed, Chelidze and his supporters made Nazi salutes in the courtroom, imitating Breivik during his trial. Nevertheless, the court sentenced the National Unity leader to only 3.5 years in prison in May.

Moreover, the Georgian government failed to show any interest in tackling the problem of far-right radicalization, even though Tbilisi hosted an Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe seminar in June on countering violent extremism.

The country's former public defender, Ucha Nanuashvili, accused the government of maintaining a double standard, displaying inconsistencies in the fight against extremism and merely reacting in exceptional cases — and even then, only inadequately. "There is no coordination of state institutions in this regard, and the impression is that the authorities are not aware of the devastating effects that are caused by encouraging these groups," Nanuashvili said.

In June, for example, the Interior Ministry refused to provide security for Tbilisi's LGBTQ community for the first-ever Pride event in what remains a country with conservative mores. Undeterred, organizers said they would hold the event anyway, even as far-right and ultranationalist groups threatened violence in response. The Georgian Orthodox Church called for calm but warned that any violence would be the fault of the Pride organizers.

A priest leads an anti-immigrant demonstration by the far-right Georgian March on Tbilisi's Aghmashenebeli Avenue in 2017. Alleged to have financial links with Russia, the movement acts against members of Georgia’s LGBTQ community and nongovernmental organizations funded by George Soros’ Open Society Institute.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Enter the Demagogue

After a tense standoff between ultraconservative groups and LGBTQ activists outside the State Chancellory on June 14, millionaire businessman Levan Vasadze announced two days later that he was forming vigilante groups to identify and abduct anyone considered likely to attend or support Tbilisi Pride. Despite warnings from the Interior Ministry that such calls violated Article 223 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits the formation of illegal groupings, Vasadze has yet to be prosecuted.

In May last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center named Vasadze as a representative of the anti-LGBTQ World Congress of Families, which is linked to Alexander Dugin, who has connections to the Kremlin. In December 2017, the center noted that Vasadze spoke in Chisinau, Moldova, at Dugin's Eurasian Conference, an event that also drew neo-Nazis and Identitarians.

Georgian ultranationalists deny any links to Moscow, Nanuashvili said. "However, their talking points are similar to those of Russian far-right groups and represent Russian 'soft power,'" he said. "Most of these groups are truly anti-Russian, but relatively large and influential groups such as Georgian March and other organizations united around leaders such as Vasadze cannot hide their pro-Russian attitudes."

George Marjanishvili, director of the Center for Participation and Democracy, is not surprised by the lack of action from authorities. "Vasadze represents a pretty influential group in Georgia," he said.
Levan Vasadze, a Georgian businessman who made his fortune in Russia, speaks outside the State Chancellory in June 2019. The location had been planned for a pro-LGBTQ rally, but Vasadze and the Georgian March instead took it over, threatening civil society actors and members of the LGBTQ community in Georgia. Although Vasadze has illegally called for the formation of anti-LGBTQ vigilante groups, authorities have yet to prosecute him.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

"It is a group that has support from the Georgian Orthodox Church and the patriarch himself," Marjanishvili said. "Most of society views (Vasadze) as the 'megaphone' of the Georgian Patriarchate so the government tries to avoid any controversy with him precisely because of this influence. Vasadze can create bigger problems for the government than the opposition, so the government usually chooses to bury its head in the sand."

Of more concern, according to critics, is speculation that the government might use such far-right groups politically. "It's quite clear that the government occasionally uses these groups to frighten and demonize liberal and other groups with different opinions from them," Nanuashvili said. "All of this reinforces the assumption that these groups have the favor and support of some government officials."

This also raises fears about next year's parliamentary elections. With its popularity at the lowest in years, the ruling Georgian Dream party is currently polling at just 21 percent, according to a recent poll from the National Democratic Institute, just six points higher than the opposition United National Movement.

With public discontent growing, especially in the wake of violent anti-government protests on June 20 and daily rallies since, Georgian Dream's founder and chairman, the billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili, has acceded to one of the demonstrators' demands, namely, that he bring forward plans to implement proportional representation to next year, instead of 2024. Ivanishvili is considered by local and regional analysts to be the real power in Georgia.

The far-right probably has enough supporters to gain seats in the Georgian Parliament, achieve legitimization and use Parliament to spread hate and xenophobia.

Crucially, Ivanishvili has also decided to abort initial plans to set an electoral threshold, meaning there will be no barrier to parliamentary representation. "We know that these groups have political ambitions, and I think this is concerning in light of changing the electoral system," Marjanishvili said. "Now the minimum barrier is almost non-existent and they probably have enough supporters to gain seats in the Georgian Parliament, achieve legitimization and use Parliament to spread hate and xenophobia."

Such concerns are not unfounded. Even under the current electoral system, the ultraconservative populist Alliance of Patriots, considered by many to be pro-Russian, entered Parliament in 2016 with six seats after narrowly scraping past the 5 percent threshold.

In 2013, Tabula, a popular online site that used to also publish a regular print edition, forecast such a scenario. "The current government is friendly toward (Vasadze) and he thus has full freedom to act," the magazine wrote. "Of primary importance, however, is how influential this new political actor will become and what degree of harm he will inflict on Georgia's interests and security."

Tabula's call has been prophetic: In the six years since, the views of Vasadze and the rest of Georgia's far-right have wormed their way further into society. And as things stand now, their influence is only likely to increase.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: Stratfor: Georgia, the great replacement, and larger implications
« Reply #746 on: September 01, 2019, 05:07:34 PM »
When the left pushes "Everything is racist, including America" and "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi, who I can then act violently towards, without legal consequence" and constant attacks on "whiteness", what are they creating?


Really wish the Southern Poverty Law Center was not cited as a source.  That said, I find myself in a very weird position.  I am a Jew who believes in the Great Replacement Theory-- but for me it is not RACIAL but cultural.  America is not a race, America is a Creed.

The propaganda of the Goolag and the Pravdas now frontally attacks the very foundations of natural law and the American Creed.  "America was never that great" say Obama, Gov. Cuomo and others and the Big Lie of America being founded upon racism and slavery is pushed everywhere.

The apparent gathering storm of impending tragedy is that those attacked by the Goolag and the Pravdas have taken on its accusation of racism instead of defending themselves/us? as the Creed that we are.

The tremendous disparity in Jewish achievement and political power, aligned in great part as it is with the Goolag, provides fertile ground for the seeds of the Old Hatred.

==================================================

In Georgia, It's Open Season for the Far-Right
By Onnik James Krikorian

A young Georgian, right, wears a T-shirt with the Stormfront logo and the number 14/88 during a September 2016 rally. The number 14 denotes David Lane’s 14-word white supremacist mantra while 88, as the eighth letter of the alphabet, signifies HH, which stands for Heil Hitler.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)
Contributor Perspectives offer insight, analysis and commentary from Stratfor’s Board of Contributors and guest contributors who are distinguished leaders in their fields of expertise.

Highlights

    Georgia's far-right movement has been growing in recent years, presenting a dangerous threat to the Jewish, LGBTQ and other non-Georgian Orthodox communities.
    Despite a recent high-profile murder and campaigns of intimidation, the government has done little to halt the spread of far-right radicalization.
    Plans to implement proportional representation with no electoral threshold could allow far-right parties to grab a greater foothold in Parliament.

It should have been a night like any other for Vitali Safarov. The 25-year-old civil rights activist had gone to a bar in central Tbilisi to socialize when he got into an argument with two neo-Nazi gang members. The altercation soon took a fatal turn and, in the early hours of Sept. 30, 2018, 21-year-old Avtandil Kandelakishvili and 24-year-old Giorgi Sokhadze killed Safarov, stabbing him 10 times.

Sokhadze, better known to his acquaintances as "Slayer," was known to have fascist leanings while Kandelakishvili had a swastika tattoo. A key witness in their trial also testified that the pair made anti-Semitic remarks as they killed Safarov, who was of Jewish and Yazidi descent. Despite the attackers' racial epithets, the court failed to qualify Safarov's murder as a hate crime.

Ultimately, the court sentenced Kandelakishvili and Sokhadze to 15 years in prison in June. Safarov's family, however, intends to appeal the decision, with the victim's mother, Marina Alanakyan, noting her determination to understand why her son was killed and ensure the case sets an important precedent for punishing hate crimes in Georgia.

Others in civil society are just as eager to discover why the government and police have failed to address the increasingly visible problem of far-right radicalization in the country. Indeed, with authorities often turning a blind eye to far-right and neo-Nazi activities and an increasingly unpopular government opening the way for more ultraconservative groupings to enter Parliament and spread their views, Georgia stands on the verge of a shift much further to the right.

A Reality Ignored

To date, violent extremism in Georgia has been framed only in the context of the Islamic State, Syria and the country's minority Muslim population. Even so, there are few effective projects to counter violent extremism in Georgia — none of which deal with far-right disengagement or deradicalization.

The Tolerance and Diversity Institute, for example, noted in a press release less than two weeks after Safarov's murder that neo-Nazi groups had been active around Tbilisi's Freedom Square for at least a year, specifically targeting bars frequented by tourists and other foreigners. Moreover, they alleged that police consistently failed to respond to complaints, including those involving the two neo-Nazis responsible for Safarov's murder.

"This was a truly tragic and fatal result of unpunished hate crimes around us," said Agit Mirzoev, who works for the Center for Participation and Democracy, where Safarov once worked. "We have been systematically talking about the dangers of (far-right) radicalization for the last four or five years, but neither the public nor the government has displayed a proper response to these concerns."

In fact, it was only when Georgians awoke to the news of the Christchurch mosque massacres in March and saw photographs of Georgian script — along with Cyrillic, Armenian and Latin — scrawled on the shooter's weapons that many began to worry about the possible connection between the Georgian far-right and radicals overseas. One of the names inscribed on attacker Brenton Tarrant's armaments was that of David the Builder, the Georgian king who led Georgian forces to victory over the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Didgori in 1121. David, his flag and 1121 have all become touchstones for far-right groups like the Georgian March, whose members have made the king's unicorn flag their main symbol and begun to wear T-shirts bearing the date of the Battle of Didgori.

Two women members of the far-right Georgian March wear T-shirts featuring an image of Georgian King David the Builder crossing himself and the year of 1121, when Georgians defeated the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Didgori. 1121 has now become an important symbol for ultranationalists.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Immediately following the New Zealand massacres, the Georgian government vowed to investigate any possible links between the country's neo-Nazis and far-right militants abroad. Since then, however, there has been no progress.

The Christchurch attacker's manifesto appeared to borrow heavily from that of Anders Breivik, the far-right terrorist who killed 77 people, including a Georgian, in a bomb attack in Oslo and a massacre on Utoya island in Norway in July 2011. Both Breivik and Tarrant appear to have been fascinated with Georgia and other Christian countries that shared a historical enmity with Muslims. Both, too, were obsessed with the "Great Replacement," a far-right conspiracy theory that non-Europeans are taking the place of white Europeans. Today, the Great Replacement is a key narrative among far-right groups in Georgia and elsewhere.

One Georgian site, MyStar, even translated the works of David Lane, a member of the U.S. domestic terrorist organization the Order, into Georgian. In the wider world, Lane is better known for his 14 words, "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children," which has become a mantra for white supremacists and neo-Nazis the world over. Meanwhile, another MyStar post quoted the Old Testament to justify the execution of children in Nazi Germany. The site did not renew its hosting at the beginning of this year, and the domain is now used to sell wallets and handbags.

Nevertheless, other sites continue to post similar content. One such group is the neo-Nazi Georgian Power, which is prolific in its dissemination of alt-right memes depicting Pepe the Frog, references to the red and blue pills from "The Matrix" (which has been appropriated by the far-right), and patriarchal images of "pure" women. It has also adopted Lane's 14 words as a Georgian hashtag on Facebook.

Most recently, ultra-conservative and nationalist groups such as the neo-Nazi National Unity and the populist Georgian March have also stepped up their activities. In May last year, both groups converged on the Georgian Parliament to face off with nightclub patrons who were protesting a particularly heavy-handed police raid on the city's famous Bassiani Club.
Sandro Bregadze, the founder of the far-right populist Georgian March, instructs his supporters to break through police lines to attack a demonstration staged by young Georgians against heavy-handed anti-drug police raids on the Bassiani nightclub in March 2018.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Despite the show of force, neither Sandro Bregadze (Georgian March's leader) nor Giorgi Chelidze (the head of National Unity) faced any changes at the time. In fact, it was only in September 2018 that authorities prosecuted Chelidze for the illegal possession of munitions — an act that came to light after he posted a video on Facebook of himself and others training with semi-automatic weapons. In the trial that followed, Chelidze and his supporters made Nazi salutes in the courtroom, imitating Breivik during his trial. Nevertheless, the court sentenced the National Unity leader to only 3.5 years in prison in May.

Moreover, the Georgian government failed to show any interest in tackling the problem of far-right radicalization, even though Tbilisi hosted an Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe seminar in June on countering violent extremism.

The country's former public defender, Ucha Nanuashvili, accused the government of maintaining a double standard, displaying inconsistencies in the fight against extremism and merely reacting in exceptional cases — and even then, only inadequately. "There is no coordination of state institutions in this regard, and the impression is that the authorities are not aware of the devastating effects that are caused by encouraging these groups," Nanuashvili said.

In June, for example, the Interior Ministry refused to provide security for Tbilisi's LGBTQ community for the first-ever Pride event in what remains a country with conservative mores. Undeterred, organizers said they would hold the event anyway, even as far-right and ultranationalist groups threatened violence in response. The Georgian Orthodox Church called for calm but warned that any violence would be the fault of the Pride organizers.

A priest leads an anti-immigrant demonstration by the far-right Georgian March on Tbilisi's Aghmashenebeli Avenue in 2017. Alleged to have financial links with Russia, the movement acts against members of Georgia’s LGBTQ community and nongovernmental organizations funded by George Soros’ Open Society Institute.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

Enter the Demagogue

After a tense standoff between ultraconservative groups and LGBTQ activists outside the State Chancellory on June 14, millionaire businessman Levan Vasadze announced two days later that he was forming vigilante groups to identify and abduct anyone considered likely to attend or support Tbilisi Pride. Despite warnings from the Interior Ministry that such calls violated Article 223 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits the formation of illegal groupings, Vasadze has yet to be prosecuted.

In May last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center named Vasadze as a representative of the anti-LGBTQ World Congress of Families, which is linked to Alexander Dugin, who has connections to the Kremlin. In December 2017, the center noted that Vasadze spoke in Chisinau, Moldova, at Dugin's Eurasian Conference, an event that also drew neo-Nazis and Identitarians.

Georgian ultranationalists deny any links to Moscow, Nanuashvili said. "However, their talking points are similar to those of Russian far-right groups and represent Russian 'soft power,'" he said. "Most of these groups are truly anti-Russian, but relatively large and influential groups such as Georgian March and other organizations united around leaders such as Vasadze cannot hide their pro-Russian attitudes."

George Marjanishvili, director of the Center for Participation and Democracy, is not surprised by the lack of action from authorities. "Vasadze represents a pretty influential group in Georgia," he said.
Levan Vasadze, a Georgian businessman who made his fortune in Russia, speaks outside the State Chancellory in June 2019. The location had been planned for a pro-LGBTQ rally, but Vasadze and the Georgian March instead took it over, threatening civil society actors and members of the LGBTQ community in Georgia. Although Vasadze has illegally called for the formation of anti-LGBTQ vigilante groups, authorities have yet to prosecute him.
(ONNIK JAMES KRIKORIAN)

"It is a group that has support from the Georgian Orthodox Church and the patriarch himself," Marjanishvili said. "Most of society views (Vasadze) as the 'megaphone' of the Georgian Patriarchate so the government tries to avoid any controversy with him precisely because of this influence. Vasadze can create bigger problems for the government than the opposition, so the government usually chooses to bury its head in the sand."

Of more concern, according to critics, is speculation that the government might use such far-right groups politically. "It's quite clear that the government occasionally uses these groups to frighten and demonize liberal and other groups with different opinions from them," Nanuashvili said. "All of this reinforces the assumption that these groups have the favor and support of some government officials."

This also raises fears about next year's parliamentary elections. With its popularity at the lowest in years, the ruling Georgian Dream party is currently polling at just 21 percent, according to a recent poll from the National Democratic Institute, just six points higher than the opposition United National Movement.

With public discontent growing, especially in the wake of violent anti-government protests on June 20 and daily rallies since, Georgian Dream's founder and chairman, the billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili, has acceded to one of the demonstrators' demands, namely, that he bring forward plans to implement proportional representation to next year, instead of 2024. Ivanishvili is considered by local and regional analysts to be the real power in Georgia.

The far-right probably has enough supporters to gain seats in the Georgian Parliament, achieve legitimization and use Parliament to spread hate and xenophobia.

Crucially, Ivanishvili has also decided to abort initial plans to set an electoral threshold, meaning there will be no barrier to parliamentary representation. "We know that these groups have political ambitions, and I think this is concerning in light of changing the electoral system," Marjanishvili said. "Now the minimum barrier is almost non-existent and they probably have enough supporters to gain seats in the Georgian Parliament, achieve legitimization and use Parliament to spread hate and xenophobia."

Such concerns are not unfounded. Even under the current electoral system, the ultraconservative populist Alliance of Patriots, considered by many to be pro-Russian, entered Parliament in 2016 with six seats after narrowly scraping past the 5 percent threshold.

In 2013, Tabula, a popular online site that used to also publish a regular print edition, forecast such a scenario. "The current government is friendly toward (Vasadze) and he thus has full freedom to act," the magazine wrote. "Of primary importance, however, is how influential this new political actor will become and what degree of harm he will inflict on Georgia's interests and security."

Tabula's call has been prophetic: In the six years since, the views of Vasadze and the rest of Georgia's far-right have wormed their way further into society. And as things stand now, their influence is only likely to increase.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Crafty, not clear what you are trying to say
« Reply #747 on: September 02, 2019, 08:58:53 AM »
"The tremendous disparity in Jewish achievement and political power, aligned in great part as it is with the Goolag, provides fertile ground for the seeds of the Old Hatred."

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72330
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #748 on: September 02, 2019, 06:26:40 PM »
The American Jewish community has replaced Judaism with Progressivism and Globalism as its religion.  Percentage wise, Jews such as me a very much an outlier (though our numbers do begin to grow I think).  As a group, proportionally Jews outperform pretty much every other ethnic group on the planet.

For a struggling cracker trying to understand what the hell is happening to his country to the point where our Founding Fathers are being sent down the memory hole and belief in our borders a sign of bigotry and racism, who sees the massive Jewish dominance in Hollywood, TV, and the Pravdas, it is not difficult to understand how some will take the path of the old hatred.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19776
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-semitism & Jews
« Reply #749 on: September 03, 2019, 04:31:46 AM »
Yes, I agree.

And ironically, George Soros, a holocaust survivor is the perfect poster boy for the "old hatred".

OTOH the hatred so far seems to be more on the Left than Right.

Just because they vote Democrat does not mean the rest won't come after them - like they think.