Author Topic: Political Economics  (Read 836874 times)

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2178
    • View Profile
Birds of a Feather
« Reply #2450 on: May 06, 2024, 10:34:39 AM »
Who is funding all the pro-Hamas college protests etc? The same people funding Biden....

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/05/pro-palestinian-protests-columbia-university-funding-donors-00156135

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics, Bidenflation
« Reply #2451 on: May 06, 2024, 08:16:41 PM »
Average car payment is now $744 per month according to Kelley Blue book, reported by Steve Moore, CTUP newsletter.

This is way up because of  high interest rates and escalating car prices.

But it's good news to the true left because they don't want people to have cars anyway.

How much money does it take to be rich anymore?  The term millionaire doesn't mean Thurston Howell anymore. More like it means you better postpone retirement because that isn't going to be enough.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Political Economics, Lowest confidence ever
« Reply #2452 on: May 07, 2024, 08:24:40 AM »
Confidence in a president running for reelection to fix the economy is the lowest under Biden since Gallup first tracked the metric, according to the pollster.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/2992228/historically-low-confidence-biden-fed-economy/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18689
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2453 on: May 07, 2024, 09:58:15 AM »
with numbers like that the election should be a blowout

I remember when Reagan ran against Carter the election did not seem assured beforehand.

But of course, Trump is no Reagan.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Political Economics, Inflation was 9%
« Reply #2454 on: May 11, 2024, 06:48:01 AM »
President Joe Biden this week:

“I mean, no president’s had the run we have had, in terms of creating jobs and bringing down inflation. It was 9% when I came to office, 9%.”


If this thread was about Joe Biden I would note that when he lies he like to repeat himself for emphasis.  See his first VP debate with Sarah Palin.

Democrats have been lying about the consequences of their policies since long before slow Joe lost his marbles.

We did have 9% inflation recently but it wasn't when this transitory President came to office, it was after markets saw his policies.  It was after multiple multi-trillion dollar boondoggles from Washington squeezed out the private sector and reckless regulations squeezed out whatever the spending missed.

"The month Biden took office, inflation was 1.4%. Eighteen months later it topped 9%. Now it’s 3.5% and rising again."
https://issuesinsights.com/2024/05/10/is-this-bidens-supermarket-scanner-moment/
-------------------------
Let me get this straight.  The reason a Democrat voter including Joe Biden should vote Democrat is because they brought the inflation rate down.  When you find out that is false and just the opposite was true, he more than tripled or quadrupled the cumulative rate of inflation in his time in office as a result of his policies, shouldn't you vote the opposite?

And if you don't use logic to make vote, why are you pretending to use it to make your argument?
« Last Edit: May 11, 2024, 07:28:52 AM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2178
    • View Profile
Restaurant Apocalypse
« Reply #2455 on: May 14, 2024, 08:49:48 AM »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Political Economics, Trump China Tariffs Punish US Consumers
« Reply #2456 on: May 15, 2024, 06:12:24 AM »
but our sh*t doesn't stink.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240427033735/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/us/politics/yellen-us-china-trade.html

"Yellen Says China Trade Deal Has ‘Hurt American Consumers’ "
That was then.
--------------

But Biden's tariffs are "targeted".  They will do amazing good and you won't feel a thing, said the lady who brought us the worst inflation since Jimmy Carter.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/treasury-secretary-yellen-on-why-biden-is-targeting-chinese-manufacturing-with-new-tariffs

Again, the lying 'tell' is the lips moving.

It might be a good policy. It might be a bad policy. But don't tell us a major tax doesn't have a cost to it.

They sold us slow Joe as a "moderate" compromise candidate. They told us Merrick Garland would be a moderate independent voice on the Supreme Court. And what a coup it was to get a chairwoman of the independent Federal Reserve to serve in the executive branch.

Why can't they just be honest and tell us they've chosen political hacks for these positions?

They say Trump only chooses "loyalists".  What do they call these appointees who check their morals, ethics and common sense at the door when they come in?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2024, 06:21:26 AM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2178
    • View Profile
CPI Manipulation
« Reply #2457 on: May 15, 2024, 09:04:01 AM »
Biden Admin removers coffee--which has shot up significantly in cost--from the consumer price index. Guess that's one way to "control inflation...."

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1790733260005499383

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2458 on: May 20, 2024, 06:58:29 PM »


https://www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2024/05/Screenshot_2024-05-19_182649.png

I wish the graph would post.

Change in household net worth under Trump, and under Biden. 

Chart 1, nominal gains, they look pretty similar, nice gains. 

Chart 2, after inflation, good gains under Trump.  Zero under Biden.

Four wasted years.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2024, 07:02:55 PM by DougMacG »

Body-by-Guinness

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 2178
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2459 on: May 21, 2024, 06:02:23 AM »


https://www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2024/05/Screenshot_2024-05-19_182649.png

I wish the graph would post.

Change in household net worth under Trump, and under Biden. 

Chart 1, nominal gains, they look pretty similar, nice gains. 

Chart 2, after inflation, good gains under Trump.  Zero under Biden.

Four wasted years.

Whoa, that's a telling graph! Tee shirt material, IMO, and I nominate Paul Krugman to recieve this tattoo across his chest, backwards, so he can view it in the mirror every morning.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2460 on: May 22, 2024, 07:42:25 AM »
Cherrypicking economic results to show that Dem policies don't work is kind of easy these last 4 years.  Today's sampling:

Federal Reserve Report:  65% report they are worse off last year due to inflation.  (The other 35% don't know it?)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2023-report-economic-well-being-us-households-202405.pdf

CBS:  New College Grads face cooling job market
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jobs-hiring-college-grads-class-of-2024/

WSJ:  Parents getting hit hard with inflation
https://www.wsj.com/economy/consumers/americans-hit-by-inflation-are-feeling-worse-financially-especially-parents-ab383606

USAToday:  Largest rent increases are in swing states
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/05/21/rents-prices-swing-states-voters-disenchanted/72794026007/

Trump:  'I'm embarrassed to only be leading this guy by a few points.'
« Last Edit: May 22, 2024, 07:45:42 AM by DougMacG »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18689
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2461 on: May 22, 2024, 07:47:18 AM »
the free shit crowd

make the rich pay!

that will solve everything.

 :wink:

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Democrat analyst tries to flip the economic narrative
« Reply #2462 on: May 22, 2024, 09:24:17 PM »
Democrat analyst tries to flip the economic narrative for the election.

With no success.

https://thehill.com/opinion/4678521-mellman-diving-deeper-the-trump-economy-vs-the-biden-economy/

Mention previously, net worth went up under Trump and not so under biden.

The jobs growth they talk about under Biden was the reopening following covid, everybody knows it.

This author thinks Trump benefited from growth coming out of the Obama Biden administration. Growth under Obama Biden was anemic, pathetic. The growth under Trump came from deregulation and tax reform, policies have consequences.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3012350/inflations-silent-impact-on-american-family-businesses/
---------------
Biden policies are shutting down family businesses in more ways than Selena Zito has room to describe in one column. For example, if you can't pass along all your hard-earned work to your family members, why would you work so hard to build it?

Completely unmeasurable of course are all the small businesses that never started due to all the complexity of over-regulation and punitive taxation.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2024, 06:09:45 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: May 25, 2024, 04:29:51 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
US Economic Growth Last Quarter Is Revised Down From 1.6% Rate to 1.3%
« Reply #2465 on: June 04, 2024, 08:17:11 AM »
This V-shaped recovery we should have had coming out of the Dem states shutdown is looking LACKLUSTER.

This news item slipped by very quietly:

1st quarter 2024 GDP results dropped from 4th quarter 2023 growth of 3.4%, to 2.5% 'estimate', to 1.6% reported growth, now to 1.3% downwardly revised growth.

Long term average growth under normal circumstances in order to keep the country going is considered to be about 3.1% growth.

https://www.businessinsider.com/gdp-gross-domestic-product-first-quarter-economy-growth-2024-4

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gdp-us-economy-grew-at-a-slower-pace-than-initially-thought-in-q1-131220924.html

https://www.usnews.com/news/economy/articles/2024-05-30/first-quarter-economic-growth-revised-downward-on-weaker-consumer-spending

And now what?  First, the release of oil from the strategic Democratic reelection reserve.  Next will be rate cuts from the compliant Federal Reserve wing of the Democratic Party.

In both cases it may be too little too late.  The first debate is this month?  June is the last month of second quarter, already looking dismal.  Atlanta Fed GDPnow already has 2nd quarter estimate lowered below 2%.  This is looking anemic, pathetic, insane to keep thinking more of the same will produce different results.

Check out the latest movements in the Atlanta FED estimates.  No one is optimistic at this point:



https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
How did Minorities fare under Trump, under Biden?
« Reply #2466 on: June 04, 2024, 09:13:53 AM »
https://committeetounleashprosperity.com/hotlines/minorities-have-fared-much-better-under-trump-than-biden/

Blacks’ real incomes rose by an average of $4,500 under Trump – or five times higher than under Biden (through the most recent Census Bureau year 2022).  Hispanics saw a $5,280 gain under Trump versus $320 under Biden.  And Asians saw an amazing near $10,000 average family income rise under Trump – and six times the gains under Biden.

Scroll right on the chart.  Wish I knew how to re-size these.


[Doug]  If you (blacks, minorities) don't want to stay poor forever under Democrat's repressive policies and have your children and grandchildren and their children grow up poor and dependent on the government forever - THEN YOU AIN'T BLACK!!
« Last Edit: June 04, 2024, 09:22:01 AM by DougMacG »

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2467 on: June 04, 2024, 09:24:56 AM »
Our federal government borrowed $500 Bilion in the first quarter in order to attain this 1.3% growth.

Congressional record May 7, 2024



Somebody say STOP THE MADNESS.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
Political Economics, Stagflation, Who Knew?
« Reply #2468 on: June 06, 2024, 05:30:46 AM »
"taking the Fed rates to artificially low levels for economic stimulus would be to repeat a pattern that causes them to go up later to punitive levels and risk future stagflation."

  - From the first paragraph of my first post in this thread 16.5 years ago.  Time flies.  But economic principles stubbornly remain.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2024, 05:41:28 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69883
    • View Profile
Re: Political Economics
« Reply #2469 on: June 06, 2024, 08:55:55 AM »
Yup.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18453
    • View Profile
US: Middle Class face Economic Hardship for the Rest of their Lives
« Reply #2470 on: June 06, 2024, 11:01:08 AM »
[Doug]  the premise behind liberals' economic policy in the United States today is that we have enough prosperity and now it's time to divide up what we have. It's simply not true. We don't have enough prosperity. That's why I get so bent out of shape pushing growth economics. The median income in this country is amazing but things cost so much today that the vast majority of people feel squeezed and the outlook for the future is no better.. We should legalize the pursuit of prosperity, "umleash prosperity", and maybe we would get more of it. Future healthcare is going to cost a lot. Energy and transportation cost a lot. Insurance costs are going way up. Housing costs are crazy, and it's all getting worse.
-----------------------------------
Bloomberg published a study:
Almost two-thirds of Americans considered middle class said they are facing economic hardship and don't anticipate a change for the rest of their lives, according to a poll commissioned by the National True Cost of Living Coalition. By many traditional measures, the US economy is strong, with robust labor, housing and stock markets, as well as solid gross domestic product growth. But the data don't capture the financial insecurity of millions of households who worry about their future and are unable to save, according to the group formed this year by two anti-poverty organizations that seek to come up with cost-of-living tools that help gauge economic well-being. In the large poll of 2,500 adults, 65% of people who earn more than 200% of the federal poverty level thats at least $60,000 for a family of four, often considered middle class said they are struggling financially. A sizable share of higher-income Americans also feel financially insecure. The survey found that a quarter of people making over five times the federal poverty level an annual income of more than $150,000 for a family of four worry about paying their bills. (Source: bloomberg.com)...
« Last Edit: June 06, 2024, 11:25:08 AM by DougMacG »