Author Topic: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.  (Read 482063 times)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1750 on: June 01, 2021, 08:20:14 AM »
". “Two Fulton County deputies who were assigned to watch the secure building where the ballots were being kept appear to have left the building 20 minutes before the alarm went off,” Robinson said on Twitter."

https://populist.press/trump-responds-after-fulton-county-ballot-facility-found-wide-open/
of course
they should be fired and have all their accounts reviewed as well as family
    watched for 10 yrs looking for the payoff

We have all these uninvestigated micro-conspiracy allegations without full evidence of the big Kracken.  We needed, for one thing, a James O'Keefe embedded in the middle of it.  Absent that, we need legal grounds to do as suggested, conduct a Mueller report level inquiry into the communications of every shady character in the chain.

There isn't going to be one smoking gun or an inauguration reversed, but there needs to be enough hard evidence to otherwise overturn the outcome in at least one of the states to make history mark the final electoral count with an asterisk.  Otherwise, "The Big Lie" narrative stands forever and future fraud will be that much harder to stop.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
voter id required round the world good post Doug
« Reply #1752 on: June 01, 2021, 08:41:03 AM »
except the dumb ass libs in UK
and
of course here where they insist on ability to go out and ballot harvest etc
to pull out elections for the Democrats

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/06/01/did-former-trump-advisor-michael-flynn-really-call-for-a-myanmar-like-coup-in-america-n1451161

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1753 on: June 01, 2021, 08:46:06 AM »
Is that the URL you had in mind?

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1754 on: June 01, 2021, 05:54:21 PM »
Total fantasy.

You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this.


". “Two Fulton County deputies who were assigned to watch the secure building where the ballots were being kept appear to have left the building 20 minutes before the alarm went off,” Robinson said on Twitter."

https://populist.press/trump-responds-after-fulton-county-ballot-facility-found-wide-open/
of course
they should be fired and have all their accounts reviewed as well as family
    watched for 10 yrs looking for the payoff

We have all these uninvestigated micro-conspiracy allegations without full evidence of the big Kracken.  We needed, for one thing, a James O'Keefe embedded in the middle of it.  Absent that, we need legal grounds to do as suggested, conduct a Mueller report level inquiry into the communications of every shady character in the chain.

There isn't going to be one smoking gun or an inauguration reversed, but there needs to be enough hard evidence to otherwise overturn the outcome in at least one of the states to make history mark the final electoral count with an asterisk.  Otherwise, "The Big Lie" narrative stands forever and future fraud will be that much harder to stop.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1755 on: June 01, 2021, 06:06:46 PM »
Total fantasy.

You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this.

I think of G M as a lot like Churchill, but on this question of giving up and giving in, I'll take Churchill:

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and
growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the
beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight
in the hills; we shall never surrender.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_LncVnecLA

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1756 on: June 01, 2021, 06:32:56 PM »
The last box is the only box that matters now.

Plan accordingly.


Total fantasy.

You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this.

I think of G M as a lot like Churchill, but on this question of giving up and giving in, I'll take Churchill:

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and
growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the
beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight
in the hills; we shall never surrender.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_LncVnecLA

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1758 on: June 02, 2021, 06:13:43 AM »
Whoa , , ,

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
Re: You aren't investigating your way out of this
« Reply #1759 on: June 02, 2021, 06:19:39 PM »
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/stunning-admission-on-bill-barr/

   - So end the investigations? 

"The last box is the only box that matters now."

    - Please explain.

"You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this."

   - Voting (and investigations) got us into this mess.

I don't buy the idea that Republican run states can't slow mass fraud down enough to conduct a fair election in their state.  Republicans control 31 state legislatures https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina.  Democrats control 19, mostly not swing states.  Most of this could be cleaned up without help from a single Democrat.  Can't clean it up without knowing what happened.  Must investigate.  For the honest citizenry, we must push them to investigate and to tighten election security, and never stop pushing until they do it.

What is the other plan?  Concede the federal government to the Left, cf. Chavez, Maduro.  Retreat to red areas and try to hold off the federal powers they gain full control over, IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, US Military, from there?

How does that work?
« Last Edit: June 02, 2021, 06:25:45 PM by DougMacG »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: You aren't investigating your way out of this
« Reply #1760 on: June 02, 2021, 07:20:36 PM »
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/stunning-admission-on-bill-barr/

   - So end the investigations? 

"The last box is the only box that matters now."

    - Please explain.

"We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box".

"You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this."

   - Voting (and investigations) got us into this mess.

I don't buy the idea that Republican run states can't slow mass fraud down enough to conduct a fair election in their state.  Republicans control 31 state legislatures https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina.  Democrats control 19, mostly not swing states.  Most of this could be cleaned up without help from a single Democrat.  Can't clean it up without knowing what happened.  Must investigate.  For the honest citizenry, we must push them to investigate and to tighten election security, and never stop pushing until they do it.

What is the other plan?  Concede the federal government to the Left, cf. Chavez, Maduro.  Retreat to red areas and try to hold off the federal powers they gain full control over, IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, US Military, from there?

How does that work?

The left has total operational control of the feral government. They did, even when Trump was the duly elected president.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
"irregularities" "many Republicans oppose" "highly suspect audit"
« Reply #1761 on: June 03, 2021, 05:05:40 AM »
black pens were "observed"
non residents
sending to Montana

https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-2020-vote-partisan-audit-allegations-katie-hobbs-governor-191115899.html

and not mentioned but the usual statement

this is threat to our Democracy!


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
RINO vt governor wants non citizens to vote
« Reply #1762 on: June 04, 2021, 08:26:41 AM »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/03/vermont-republican-governor-seeks-to-give-non-citizens-voting-rights-in-local-elections/

what is it about the concept of citizens versus NON citizens
people refuse to accept

with Republicans like this we have no hope





ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1767 on: June 09, 2021, 03:49:01 PM »
"Why A Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud On His Mind: "Pristine" Biden Ballots That Looked Xerox'd"

It is amazing how long it is taking to get evidence that is more than just a few ballots here a few ballots there,
and tired of reading "bombshell" and Audit 'devastating news" headline
etc on  'Populist Press'

it is like chicken little every time I see this stuff



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
2016: Obama against federalizing elections
« Reply #1770 on: June 16, 2021, 06:17:05 AM »
Pasting this post here as well:

President Barack Obama speaks out forcefully against HR-1, in 2016
« Reply #433 on: May 11, 2021, 11:46:23 AM »
QuoteModifyRemoveSplit Topic
White House Press Conference August 4, 2016  28:20 on this video:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/watch-president-obamas-full-news-conference-at-the-pentagon/2016/08/04/b728125e-5a95-11e6-8b48-0cb344221131_video.html

Question, Josh Lederman: Thank you, Mr. President. Repeatedly now, Donald Trump has said that this
election will be rigged against him, challenging really the core foundation of our democratic
system. Can you promise the American people that this election will be conducted in a fair
way? And are you worried that comments like his could erode the public's faith in the
outcome of the election?

"It is -- I don't even really know where to start on answering this question. Of course the
elections will not be rigged. What does that mean? The federal government doesn't run the
election process. States and cities and communities all across the country, they are the ones
who set up the voting systems and the voting booths. And if Mr. Trump is suggesting that
there is a conspiracy theory that is being propagated across the country, including in places
like Texas, where typically it's not Democrats who are in charge of voting booths, that's
ridiculous. That doesn't make any sense. And I don't think anybody would take that seriously."

https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/PDFFiles/Barack%20Obama%20-%20ISIL%20Presser%20Post%20Security%20Council%20Meeting.pdf


That is exactly what HR-1 seeks to reverse, state and local control of elections.  Instead it nationalizes control of the standards and processes, making this stated reason that rigging is not possible, possible.

Thank you Barack Obama, the gift that keeps giving.



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
Electoral process: Easy to Vote, Hard to Cheat, Glenn Reynolds
« Reply #1773 on: June 17, 2021, 07:28:07 AM »
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/06/17/easy_to_vote_hard_to_cheat_145941.html

"we need paper ballots, voter ID, and open counting"

[Why is this so hard?]

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
Abrams for Manchin's voting "compromise "
« Reply #1774 on: June 18, 2021, 05:39:43 AM »
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/stacey-abrams-backs-manchin-s-compromise-voting-legislation-n1271134

So we know it cannot be good (for us)

If this gets passed, Abrams knows she will still be able to cheat

So 50 Dems
  (and likely murkowski and romney )  will be for it, and with Harris -
 we lose



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
kerik over 1 million votes
« Reply #1777 on: June 22, 2021, 09:27:50 AM »
that Trump won in Pa
that were squashed:

https://rumble.com/viuhbl-kerik-trump-won-by-over-1-million-votes-in-key-state.html

I wonder if I can come up with "2 " million can I be interviewed ?

At this point :

 :roll: :roll: :roll:

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
Trump of course goes after Barr now
« Reply #1778 on: June 28, 2021, 06:54:10 AM »
https://populist.press/trump-blasts-barr/

still waiting for audit results............. :roll:............ :roll:........... :roll:

which might help substantiate my suspicions but will have no overall effect otherwise
 of course.



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1781 on: June 30, 2021, 05:36:58 AM »
Besides vote cheating, ranked choice voting is a strange idea.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18119
    • View Profile
RCV is BS, Ranked Choice Voting, NYC
« Reply #1783 on: June 30, 2021, 03:09:50 PM »
Ranked Choice Voting is the design of the Liberal Left who don't want to risk losing to a Republican when their side is divided between the pure Left and a more electable Liberal choice.

I don't know how it works, and they don't know how it works, but the idea is that if a majority vote for Liberal Choice 1 with Liberal Choice 2 as their second choice, or vice versa, they cannot lose to conservative choice 1 getting less than 50% of the vote who is no one's second choice.

In other words, Bill Clinton who never got 50% of the vote would never have been President.

NYC in chaos, this link or see previous post:
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/nyc-board-of-elections-to-release-new-unofficial-primary-results-after-ranked-choice-fail/3131856/

Nothing says how screwed up it is more than watching it play out:

"135,000 ballot images that were in its computer system for testing purposes had never been cleared, proved that the board was not equipped to handle the new ranked choice system.

The BOE uses memory sticks to transfer voting data from scanner machines to their computer system. Those memory sticks, which were used on primary night, only collect data on first-choice votes, with a second set of memory sticks used to transfer the ranked choice data. Four of the five boroughs had the second set of memory sticks scrubbed of the test ballot info, but the Queens test data had not been cleared."


We don't pick our leaders with second and third choice votes; this is bullshit.

Ray of hope from the article:

"City Council’s Black, Latino and Asian Caucus...favor putting a repeal of ranked choice voting on the November ballot."

Do it!


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
Epoch Times: NYC 135,000 vote error
« Reply #1784 on: July 01, 2021, 05:51:35 AM »
New York’s Mayoral Primary Vote Count Voided After 135,000 Ballot Discrepancy
BY TOM OZIMEK June 30, 2021 Updated: June 30, 2021 biggersmaller Print
The New York City Board of Elections said on June 29 that 135,000 test ballots were accidentally included in a preliminary tally of votes cast in the city’s mayoral primary election, leading to the count being voided and drawing the ire of candidates.

New York’s first attempt at ranked-choice voting (RCV) descended into confusion after the elections board abruptly removed updated vote totals from its website hours after posting them, citing a “discrepancy” in the numbers.

“We are aware there is a discrepancy in the unofficial RCV round by round elimination report,” the board said in a statement, noting that it was working with technical staff to identify the discrepancy and asking “candidates to have patience.”

Later, the board posted another statement noting that it had inadvertently failed to remove sample ballots it had used to test its software.

“When the cast vote records were extracted for the first pull of RCV results, it included both test and election night results, producing approximately 135,000 additional records,” the board stated, apologizing for the error and vowing “to ensure the most accurate up to date results are reported.”


“The cast vote record will be re-generated and the RCV rounds will be re-tabulated,” the board stated.

New York’s primary election was held a week ago, when preliminary results showed Eric Adams, the Brooklyn borough president, with a 10-point lead. That preliminary advantage appeared to shrink to 2 points on June 29, when voters’ second, third, fourth, and fifth choices were factored in under the ranked-choice voting system being used for the first time in a mayoral contest.

But after the votes were released, reporters and campaign staffers noticed that there were around 135,000 more votes counted than had been reported on election night, with Adams releasing a statement calling on the Board of Elections “to explain such a massive increase,” which he said raised “serious questions.”

After the board acknowledged the mistake, Adams issued another statement calling the error “unfortunate” and saying that “it is critical that New Yorkers are confident in their electoral system.”

By the evening of June 29, the Board of Elections had taken down the vote totals and replaced them with a note stating that the results would be available on June 30.

The since-voided results appeared to show the race narrowing, with Kathryn Garcia, the city’s former sanitation chief who ran as a technocrat, moving up to a close second and Maya Wiley, a former MSNBC analyst and civil rights lawyer, falling from second to third.

Wiley, who finished second to Adams on election night in first-rank votes, bemoaned the board’s mistake.

“This error by the Board of Elections is not just failure to count votes properly today, it is the result of generations of failures that have gone unaddressed,” she said in a statement. “Sadly, it is impossible to be surprised.”

Garcia, too, expressed criticism in a statement, stating that the board’s release of incorrect ranked-choice vote tallies “is deeply troubling and requires a much more transparent and complete explanation.” She also said that all absentee and ranked-choice votes “must be counted accurately, so that all New Yorkers have faith in our democracy and our government.”

The discrepancy also drew a critical comment from former President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., who has suggested that New York’s vote discrepancy illustrates the need to ask hard questions about election integrity.

“Let me get this straight? You can be off by 135,000 votes in a New York City mayoral primary alone but if someone loses the White House by less than 45,000 across multiple states in a presidential election, you can’t have any questions,” Trump Jr. wrote in a Twitter post. “Seems legit … if you live in China.”

The final results of the mayoral primary are expected to be announced sometime in July.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
PA Gov vetoes vote integrity bill
« Reply #1785 on: July 01, 2021, 05:53:29 AM »
second post

Pennsylvania Gov. Vetoes GOP-Backed Election Integrity Bill
BY JACK PHILLIPS June 30, 2021 Updated: June 30, 2021 biggersmaller Print
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf vetoed a Republican-backed election overhaul bill that would expand voter identification requirements, move up the voter registration deadline, limit the use of drop-boxes, and allow county officials to conduct early pre-canvassing for mail-in ballots, among other measures.

In explaining why he vetoed the bill, the Democrat governor wrote that he “made it clear I wouldn’t sign a bill that creates barriers to voting,” adding “that’s exactly what this bill does by: Limiting mail ballots, Capping early voting, Cutting voter registration time.”

On Wednesday, Wolf also used his line-item veto authority to remove a budget legislation proposal that would earmark millions of dollars to create an election-auditing agency.

Wolf separately wrote in his veto letter that he wants to work on legislation that can be passed on a bipartisan basis later this year.

The election measure, known as the Voting Rights Protection Act, passed in the GOP-held state Senate by a vote of 29 to 21, falling short of the two-thirds majority to override Wolf’s veto.


Pennsylvania state Rep. Seth Grove, a Republican who chairs the House State Government Committee, on Wednesday accused Wolf of failing voters and asserted that provisions within the bill are supported by most Pennsylvanians.

“To say I am disappointed in Wolf’s lack of action is an understatement,” Grove said in a statement to media outlets. “Though Wolf has put on blinders to problems within our election process, it doesn’t mean the problems do not exist.”

Conservative policy group Heritage Action sharply criticized the governor’s veto.

“Voter ID requirements are a common-sense first step to protecting our elections. They are supported by 74 percent of Pennsylvania voters,” the group’s director, Jessica Anderson, said Wednesday.

The bill is also one of several efforts by Republican-controlled legislatures to shore up what they say are lax laws and enforcement around elections. They’ve also argued that such bills are needed to restore public trust in elections.

Meanwhile, Democrats have near-universally panned such measures at the state and federal level, accusing Republicans of trying to suppress voter turnout rates. In other states, Democrats have accused Republicans of passing such measures in a bid to suppress minority groups’ voting rights.

Recent polls, however, have suggested that a majority of Americans support requiring voters to present photo identification before casting their ballots. A survey from Monmouth suggested that 62 percent of Democrats, 87 percent of independents, and 91 percent of Republicans support some form of voter identification requirement.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
More BS
« Reply #1787 on: July 05, 2021, 08:19:29 AM »
https://populist.press/arizona-senators-drop-bomb-on-audit-outcome/

if audit does not show enough fraud to be significant
so be it but I am tired of the hot air at this point

populist press = bulls..t press

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
AZ
« Reply #1788 on: July 05, 2021, 01:39:52 PM »
a) It appears a goodly amount of grifting is going on , , ,

b) Not inferring that this is that, just posting it on its own merits vel non:

https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/05/attorney-az-sec-of-state-katie-hobbs-and-maricopa-county-election-officials-have-known-since-nov-3-that-election-servers-were-breached/

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
WSJ: AG Garland should drop the GA lawsuit
« Reply #1789 on: July 05, 2021, 02:45:54 PM »

Attorney General Merrick Garland is the front-runner so far for 2021’s bad timing prize. The Justice Department last month rushed out a lawsuit claiming that Georgia’s new election law violates Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act only days before the Supreme Court laid down standards that make the lawsuit a nearly certain loser.


Justice knew the likely timing of the Court’s ruling in Brnovich v. DNC, so a fair guess is that Mr. Garland succumbed to White House and progressive pressure to make a political statement to support Democratic efforts in Congress to federalize state election laws in H.R.1.

Bad call. Now federal judges hearing the case will have to contend with Justice Samuel Alito’s five principles in Brnovich as they assess the Georgia statute.


It won’t be easy to find legal fault under those principles. Mere voting inconvenience can’t be considered disqualifying, since all voting imposes some inconvenience. Any specific voting provision, such as the number of drop boxes, must also be considered in the overall context of a state’s voting rules. Georgia’s rules are generally lenient and don’t especially burden the ability of minorities to vote.


Perhaps Justice can find a federal judge somewhere to rule against Georgia, but such a ruling is unlikely to survive on appeal to higher courts. The legal and political result of the lawsuit is therefore likely to vindicate Georgia Republicans during the 2022 election season or leading up to 2024, depending on how the lawsuits proceed. Mr. Garland would be wise to drop the suit in light of Brnovich, lest his term at Justice be marred by the continuation of this patently political lawsuit.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
are we sure
« Reply #1790 on: July 05, 2021, 02:55:44 PM »
https://www.yahoo.com/news/could-a-voter-id-compromise-be-a-win-for-voting-rights-162258909.html

"Conservatives have continued to argue that it’s entirely reasonable to ask people to prove their identity with a government-issued ID in order to prevent fraud — though cases of in-person voter impersonation are exceedingly rare"

well I won't buy it unless the audit if it ever gets finished comes to this conclusion
voter fraud is not rare
though in person  may not be common
I am not sure how it is being done but it ain't rare

Guliani was quipping on his radio show he was trying to figure how to win the dead vote from the Democrats when he ran for mayor.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
what if audit comes up with conclusion opposite the media driven results?
« Reply #1791 on: July 07, 2021, 03:15:54 PM »
as CD asked in previous post

here is some pondering about the possibility of audit findings

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/07/how_barack_obama_begot_gwen_berry.html

I think we know what will happen - nothing

and the results themselves will of course be questioned
attacked
and lawyers charging up the hour calculators jumping into the fray
 and the media bashing anyone who supports the big lie
and Trump going beyond nuts ranting and raving
how the SCOTUS should take this up
we need to protest
etc etc


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
audit in PA
« Reply #1792 on: July 08, 2021, 06:32:29 AM »
https://populist.press/breaking-another-full-forensic-audit-announced/

concentrate in Phila Pittsburgh
on what the PA AG was in on
since he "knew" Trump would lose

in the end though
it will be us vs the Democrat machine
so nothing will come of it but talking points
and confirmation of what we already know

we will be able to scream *the big lie* is actually the Dem machine coverup of election fraud


G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: You aren't investigating your way out of this
« Reply #1793 on: July 09, 2021, 12:43:30 PM »
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/stunning-admission-on-bill-barr/

   - So end the investigations? 

"The last box is the only box that matters now."

    - Please explain.

"We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box".

"You aren't voting or investigating your way out of this."

   - Voting (and investigations) got us into this mess.

I don't buy the idea that Republican run states can't slow mass fraud down enough to conduct a fair election in their state.  Republicans control 31 state legislatures https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina.  Democrats control 19, mostly not swing states.  Most of this could be cleaned up without help from a single Democrat.  Can't clean it up without knowing what happened.  Must investigate.  For the honest citizenry, we must push them to investigate and to tighten election security, and never stop pushing until they do it.

What is the other plan?  Concede the federal government to the Left, cf. Chavez, Maduro.  Retreat to red areas and try to hold off the federal powers they gain full control over, IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, US Military, from there?

How does that work?

The left has total operational control of the feral government. They did, even when Trump was the duly elected president.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/394653.php

VOAT HARDER!!!!   :roll:

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1794 on: July 09, 2021, 04:08:31 PM »
well
I would think Mike Savage is right

we aren't about to get into the cartridge box strategy
 until people start starving in the streets

till then it won't happen in 2021 in my opinion

but just in case the Left is taking over the military leadership for this reason
 which is obvious







Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1795 on: July 10, 2021, 06:02:05 AM »
Tucker read most of
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/394653.php on the air last night.  Extremely eloquent!!!

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 69117
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1796 on: July 10, 2021, 06:25:25 AM »
I am about to head out for several hours.  Is there someone who could collect that series of incredibly eloquent tweets into one whole and post it here?


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
Re: The electoral process, vote fraud, SEIU/ACORN et al, etc.
« Reply #1798 on: July 10, 2021, 07:17:31 AM »
better read Doug's post above before it gets wiped clean by FBI or big tech.

Assume we are all now on some surveillance list

I am old enough to remember I trusted our government..........

 :-(



ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 18349
    • View Profile
voter Id preventing Dem party illegal voting fraud
« Reply #1799 on: July 10, 2021, 07:58:02 AM »
and this my friends , as we all know , is why Abrams and crew are fighting voting integrity  so hard:

https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/new-evidence-indicates-enough-illegal-votes-in-georgia-to-tip-2020-results/