Author Topic: The US Congress; Congressional races  (Read 377407 times)

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: Don't believe this for even a millisecond
« Reply #700 on: January 06, 2020, 08:42:19 AM »
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/aoc-to-lose-her-congressional-district-after-2020-census/
but it is nice to dream

They don't lose their seat, but they will see districts redrawn and could have two incumbents in one new district.

She (and 'Omar') lose their seat when a different democrat beats them in a primary.  All these wackos come from far-Left districts.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: Meet Dalia al-Aqidi
« Reply #702 on: January 17, 2020, 04:34:23 PM »
https://pjmedia.com/election/meet-dalia-al-aqidi-the-patriotic-republican-muslim-who-wants-to-defeat-ilhan-omar/

 :-D  8-) :-)

Thank you for this.  A republican can't win, but to run hard, present an alternative, work to change minds and close the gap is crucially important.  People said a Democrat couldn't be elected Senator in Alabama, but if the ruling party candidate is weak enough or the field is divided, you never know.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
A Republican not likely to win
« Reply #703 on: January 17, 2020, 05:05:01 PM »

Dough wrote:
"A republican can't win, but to run hard, present an alternative, work to change minds and close the gap is crucially important"


But she win or lose ----
Would it not be great for DJT to go and campaign in her district for her and America?



DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
US Congressional races, Trump (and Pelosi) Nationalizes the House Race
« Reply #705 on: February 07, 2020, 09:50:43 AM »
First this, ccp regarding Rep. Ilhan Omar in Minneapolis: 
Doug wrote:  "A republican can't win, but to run hard, present an alternative, work to change minds and close the gap is crucially important"
But she win or lose ---- Would it not be great for DJT to go and campaign in her district for her and America?

  - Yes!  Minnesota the almost purple state, not her district the far Left city, is embarrassed of Omar.  When Trump fills Target Center downtown Mpls. with election excitement, he draws from the entire state and region.  Keep in mind that conservative western (swing state) Wisconsin is part of the Greater Twin Cities area and media market. 

The Twin Cities area includes two suburban Congressional Districts that flipped R to D in 2018.  Trump winning MN and Republicans winning back these two districts are closely related challenges.  Those supposed moderates joined with Pelosi, Omar, Tlaib and AOC on impeachment, resistance and policy.  That is not what voters were promised.  Meanwhile Trump brought peace and prosperity, not what they were told would happen if he was elected.  Trump's rise with suburban women, if true, flips these two seats and others like them possibly winning the House, also clinches the Presidency.  The Presidential race and the House races are deeply intertwined.

The city is also a great place to break the bond between blacks and Democrats. Omar can't be beat by a Republican conservative in a far Left district, and Trump won't carry California or NY, but every split between her party and the constituent groups they exploit for votes is a win.

The impeachment vote and the tear up of the speech frames the House contest.  Trump's ego says he has to be a great, two term President.  Greatness requires winning back the House, otherwise that loss is forever part of his legacy, as it was with Obama who lost his legacy.  Winning back the House negates impeachment and is needed to advance any agenda. It's a national race now.

Related:  http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-republicans-house-chances-its-on-trump/

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Dershowitz : Schumer and Pelosi have to go
« Reply #706 on: February 09, 2020, 04:58:06 PM »
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/nancypelosi-chuckschumer-alandershowitz-2020/2020/02/09/id/953273/

agree but we may get someone like a socialist next

best option
Republicans win back the House
in '20. and then pressure will be on Pelosi.

I don't know if either can be dislodged while both alive though - they and their mob are not just going to walk off into the sunset
They NEVER do

they have to be dragged out kicking and screaming

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Congressional races, AOC meet MCC, Former CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera
« Reply #707 on: February 11, 2020, 10:25:27 AM »
https://nypost.com/2020/02/11/former-cnbc-anchor-michelle-caruso-cabrera-to-take-on-aoc-in-primary/

"What I've learned from the BP oil disaster, the housing debacle and the financial collapse is that government is over-regulating our lives and yet is never going to protect us."  - MCC  2010
https://www.amazon.com/You-Know-Right-Prosperity-Government/dp/1400169623?tag=nypost-20






Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
President's power to adjourn Congress
« Reply #713 on: April 16, 2020, 07:39:02 PM »
1)

https://reason.com/2020/04/15/noel-canning-redux-justice-scalia-wrote-that-the-president-could-use-the-adjournment-power-to-block-senate-intransgience/


===============

2)  Yes, Trump Can Close Congress
The Constitution gives him the power to resolve a ‘disagreement’ over the ‘time of adjournment.’
By Sai Prakash
April 16, 2020 7:01 pm ET

Every president eventually reaches into a bag of tricks. Donald Trump is no different. On Wednesday he demanded that Congress adjourn so that he can make recess appointments—temporary appointments permissible when the Senate is recessed. If Congress fails to adjourn, he threatens to close it, using constitutional authority no president has ever deployed. The president has it right. And he has James Madison, the father of the Constitution, on his side.

For decades, presidents abused their Article II recess appointment power, bypassing Senate consent. During George W. Bush’s presidency, then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid devised a gambit to stop it. Every three days two senators would gavel open the Senate and then quickly close it. Mr. Reid insisted that this ritual meant that the Senate was in session, meaning Mr. Bush couldn’t make recess appointments. After Republicans deployed the maneuver against President Obama, the Supreme Court endorsed it. The court concluded that if the Senate says it is ready to do business, it is in session. This was dubious, for if almost all senators are hundreds of miles away from the Capitol, the Senate can’t really be in session.


Mr. Trump’s counter-maneuver should win the grudging respect of the wily Mr. Reid. “If the House will not agree to [an] adjournment, I will exercise my constitutional authority to adjourn both chambers of Congress. The current practice of leaving town while conducting phony pro forma sessions is a dereliction of duty that the American people cannot afford,” the president said Wednesday. “It is a scam what they do.”

It may seem odd that the president is able to close another branch of government. But Article II of the Constitution empowers him to assert that there is a “case of disagreement” between the chambers “with respect to the time of adjournment” and adjourn Congress himself. If the Senate resolves to adjourn and the House refuses to do so, Mr. Trump can shutter Congress.

So said James Madison. In 1788, Madison observed: “Were the Senate to attempt to prevent an adjournment, it would but serve to irritate the Representatives, without having the intended effect, as the President could adjourn them.” This is the converse of our situation. If the House were “to prevent an adjournment,” it would serve no purpose, “as the President could adjourn” Congress.

We should feel no sympathy for Congress. The House pretends to be open for the sake of preventing recess appointments. Yet as things stand, because neither chamber is actually meeting in any real sense, nothing can pass. Hence the Senate is in a de facto recess. Under current rules, when legislators go home, we have a Potemkin Congress.

If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wants to cooperate, the Senate should agree to adjourn for 10 days or more. If after a few days the House refused to pass an adjournment resolution, Mr. Trump could cite the disagreement and adjourn Congress and make recess appointments. Neither Speaker Nancy Pelosi nor Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer could force the Senate back into session.

Any recess appointments would be challenged. But the courts would be hard-pressed to deny that there was a disagreement, especially since James Madison supports the president’s invocation of an express constitutional power.

Mr. Prakash is a law professor and Miller Center fellow at the University of Virginia and author of “The Living Presidency: An Originalist Argument Against Its Ever-Expanding Powers.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2020, 07:53:18 PM by Crafty_Dog »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #715 on: April 20, 2020, 05:46:01 AM »
Republicans who care had better step it up  right now or LOSE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/19/house-elections-cash-rich-democrats-tighten-grip-194570
 
Recruitment flops and lackluster fundraising have weakened Republicans’ chances in over a dozen competitive House districts, leaving them with an increasingly narrow path back to power.

Though GOP strategists feel confident they will see some gains this cycle, the latest fundraising reports out last week painted a bleak picture of their odds of netting the 18 seats needed to recapture the House, particularly with campaigning frozen by a global pandemic.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #716 on: April 20, 2020, 07:14:57 AM »
Doug,

Why do you think that is?
I hate to say it but Trump is not inspiring during this epidemic
yes I know the media is nearly 100% against him but his briefings are not helping to me
right after last nights initiation into his talk where he holds up a WSJ and discusses how it compliments HIM, I fell to sleep
and of course I read later that CNN and the rest continue to badger him and of course he reacts the way he always does and will

Is there really more than a few who are not just tired of all this

His best chance of winning is he give Biden a mini mental status test during the next debate showing Biden is in early stages of dementa

Just my 2 cents

if it ain't trump fatigue then what is it with Republicans?

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #717 on: April 20, 2020, 07:53:55 AM »
Doug,
Why do you think that is?
I hate to say it but Trump is not inspiring during this epidemic
yes I know the media is nearly 100% against him but his briefings are not helping to me
right after last nights initiation into his talk where he holds up a WSJ and discusses how it compliments HIM, I fell to sleep
and of course I read later that CNN and the rest continue to badger him and of course he reacts the way he always does and will

Is there really more than a few who are not just tired of all this

His best chance of winning is he give Biden a mini mental status test during the next debate showing Biden is in early stages of dementia

Just my 2 cents

if it ain't trump fatigue then what is it with Republicans?

The worry is November, not what people are thinking in April.  But what happens in April greatly affects November.  Democrats are now stuck with Biden, short of some combination of miracles for them.  Republicans are stuck with the congressional candidates they recruit and select now.  Incumbents used to have a 98% success rate.  To disrupt that, you need everything to go right for you.

What the country needs is not only a Republican sweep of House, Senate and White House, but it has to be the right ones, running for the right reasons, and courageousluy sticking to their principles.  A rare find.  Republicans won House, Senate and White House through most of 2001-2006 - and governed like Democrats.  They had some tax cuts and some temporary economic growth, but grew government terribly and  left all the destructive forces in Washington untouched.

Another two years of Trump sharing power with Pelosi-Omar-AOC will mean more of the same.  The fight with each other prevents a win against all that is wrong, such as the screwed up FDA and CDC, not to mention government taking over housing, healthcare and everything else.

Recruiting a top, smooth talking Democrat to move to Washington and help the Left rule the country is a dream job for him or her, in a dream place with dream powers.  Recruiting a common sense, limited government supporting conservative to leave family, community and private sector behind and move to Washington to be treated like dirt and be called racist and worse, just to try to save their country while swimming upstream, is a nightmare requiring enormous personal sacrifice, just to take the blame for all that goes wrong - because no one has ever really cut the size and scope of government.

Similar problems exist for recruiting the best conservative minds to go into education and journalism.  We are at a gigantic disadvantage because that is not what these kinds of people aspire to do.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #718 on: April 20, 2020, 08:18:29 AM »
appreciate the response
but you kind of side stepped part of my question while answering the more general concept also on the mark.

but

is there Trump fatigue and is this spilling over to the Congessional races or are they more local phenomena?

 :|





DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #719 on: April 22, 2020, 08:07:53 AM »
kind of side stepped part of my question...
is there Trump fatigue and is this spilling over to the Congessional races or are they more local phenomena?


I do not know on Trump fatigue.  Stories of huge viewership of his daily briefings seem to come from March.  I think people have virus fatigue.  Strangely, some of us long for the return of more conventional political issues.

Trump wanted to run against Sanders and socialism.  By getting Biden he doesn't get the clear ideology to run against but most likely eliminates the threat of a serious third contender, Howard Schultz or Bloomberg.

For the congressional races he wants to nationalize against AOC, Omar and the gang.

6 BIG Senate races will be local in nature, but the national mood matters.

One issue left behind by the virus is that these pretend moderates in their suburban swing districts all voted for impeachment based on nothing that was going nowhere.  Washington spun its wheels while the trouble of the century was brewing.  Democrat supported institutions failed.  Trump, at some point, needs to get back to calling them out and running against the Democrat House, their obstructionism, their failures and their screwed up agenda.  Individual R. candidates will not be able to fully make that case.

But for now, Trump was right to be the face of the virus fight.  Trump fatigue on that front is far preferable to the Bush Katrina charge that was sure to otherwise come his way.  He is the uniter, not the rich guy out playing golf on his own closed golf courses while the scientists lock down the nation.  Make America great again is what everyone is thinking right now, if he didn't hold the copyright on it.

If people blame trump for the virus hitting the US so hard, Trump loses.  If people rightfully blame  China, Trump is the number one person in the world standing up to China, without question.

Nine out of 10 Americans now see China as a threat, Pew Research
https://qz.com/1842150/what-americans-think-are-the-greatest-threats-from-china/

In the end, the question of Trump fatigue is binary.  We are sick of a lot of things, but the alternative to Trump is Biden. 

Trump achieved TWICE the growth rate of Obama-Biden.  The big question for November I think is, who can lead us back to economic growth better and faster?  The only two answers to that are Trump and Trump denial.  Then for Congress the question becomes, which party in Congress can work better with President Trump to lead us back to robust economic growth.  The answer is Republicans, but expect the debate to be confused and conflated by a billion dollars of influence spent to say otherwise.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #720 on: April 22, 2020, 09:07:15 AM »

[. Nine out of 10 Americans now see China as a threat, Pew Research ]

Is pelosi ahead of this ?

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3036017/nancy-pelosi-wants-us-be-tougher-china-donald-trump-aligning-eu-pressure

certainly not as much as she thinks,  if she is bashing Trump for his stance on China and not the Dems.
she took a few comments about Trump saying nice things about Xi out of context

Bloomberg , Feinstein , Biden family

https://qz.com/1842150/what-americans-think-are-the-greatest-threats-from-china/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv7yVCwv6NU

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
FBI serves warrant on senator in investigation of stock sales linked to coronavirus
MAY 13, 20206:54 PM UPDATED 7:17 PM
WASHINGTON  —  Federal agents seized a cellphone belonging to a prominent Republican senator on Wednesday night as part of the Justice Department’s investigation into controversial stock trades he made as the novel coronavirus first struck the U.S., a law enforcement official said.
Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, turned over his phone to agents after they served a search warrant on the lawmaker at his residence in the Washington area, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a law enforcement action.

Sen. Burr steps aside as Intelligence Committee chair after FBI warrant in stock inquiry
May 14, 2020
The seizure represents a significant escalation in the investigation into whether Burr violated a law preventing members of Congress from trading on insider information they have gleaned from their official work.

To obtain a search warrant, federal agents and prosecutors must persuade a judge they have probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. The law enforcement official said the Justice Department is examining Burr’s communications with his broker.

Such a warrant being served on a sitting U.S. senator would require approval from the highest ranks of the Justice Department and is a step that would not be taken lightly. Kerri Kupec, a Justice Department spokeswoman, declined to comment.

A second law enforcement official said FBI agents served a warrant in recent days on Apple to obtain information from Burr’s iCloud account and said agents used data obtained from the California-based company as part of the evidence used to obtain the warrant for the senator’s phone.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-05-13/fbi-serves-warrant-on-senator-stock-investigation
-----------------------------
[Doug]
A.  On the forum we try to treat scandal on the right same as we would treat scandal on the Left.  If this were AOC, Biden or Schumer, we would be all over this.

B.  On the other side of this, I don't think it took "Inside Information" to decide to sell your stocks in the face of a virus causing outbreaks and lockdowns in a province with seven times the population of London.  He could have just been reading the forum.  I sold my stock at that time just looking at how the Chinese shutdown would hurt earnings of DOW, NASDAQ, S&P companies and knowing how panicky other investors would react to those numbers when they come out, NOT anticipating a complete shutdown of the USA and the world.

C.  The day in question was Feb 13, 2020. 
https://www.propublica.org/article/burr-family-stock
That is TWO WEEKS AFTER WHO declared coronavirus outbreak a global health emergency.  2 weeks after Trump shut down all flights to the US from China, not exactly early in this crisis.  2 weeks after articles in Hospital Review report sold out masks.  Had he done this in Nov-Dec 2019, very early January, I might suspect inside information.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/30/who-declares-coronavirus-outbreak-a-global-health-emergency/
What sold-out coronavirus face masks teach about price-gouging, January 31st, 2020
Since the coronavirus outbreak began, sales of medical face masks have spiked, especially since the government confirmed the first human-to-human transmission of the virus.
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/supply-chain/what-sold-out-coronavirus-face-masks-teach-about-price-gouging.html

The strange thing about mid-Feb, check my posts, is that stocks had not dropped even though anyone/everyone could see that bad health and economic news was coming.

D.  The default position of an elected politician should be to be out of stocks while in public office - to avoid this kind of thing, yet they have some right like the rest of us to earn a return on their savings and investments. 

E.  As indicated in the article, this is a very serious move by DOJ/FBI.  It is either deep state running wild or it is serious people like AG Barr looking at serious indications of violation of insider trading law.

Insiders knew the least of anyone in this crisis.  He could have bought a mask, sanitizer or toilet paper stocks.  Just closing out his position while we see where this goes seems cautious, prudent, logical to me.


ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #722 on: May 15, 2020, 07:06:54 AM »
Rush pointed out we don't see the same treatment of similarly corrupt appearing Diane the Feinstein

he says no mention of seizing her phone etc

only she answered a few questions and she happily turned over a few documents in a quiet back door chat with agents.

no headlines
no "seizure"

why are crats always treated differently?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #723 on: May 15, 2020, 11:56:19 AM »
I'm willing to wait and see on this.

1) I'm willing to give Barr the benefit of the doubt in the absence of contrary evidence;

2) the facts could be quite different in each of the cases in ways that present distinct evidentiary issues.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
House Proxy Voting
« Reply #724 on: May 27, 2020, 05:43:05 PM »

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #725 on: May 27, 2020, 07:43:22 PM »
Deep State Barr will say the right things while the FBIDNC targets republicans.


I'm willing to wait and see on this.

1) I'm willing to give Barr the benefit of the doubt in the absence of contrary evidence;

2) the facts could be quite different in each of the cases in ways that present distinct evidentiary issues.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races MN
« Reply #726 on: June 22, 2020, 07:32:26 AM »
Every race for the Senate and House this year is going to matter, not just the Presidency, and margin of victory or defeat matters too.

[Copying info to this thread:]
Jason Lewis, Republican candidate for US Senate in Minnesota, Planned Parenthood's Tina Smith seat.  Lewis was a local talk show host, formerly a frequent guest host for Rush Limbaugh, former congressman in one of the suburban districts that flipped Dem in 2018.  [Give money] https://lewisformn.com/  He leans constitutionalist, libertarian and anti-hawk, maybe of the Rand Paul mold.


https://www.lacyjohnson.com/  Lacy Johnson, Republican candidate for Ilhan Omar's seat in congress. 
Does race matter?

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
The Filibuster is going, going , , ,
« Reply #727 on: June 26, 2020, 05:55:56 AM »
The Filibuster Is Going, Going . . .
Chris Coons, a key Biden ally, signals Democrats will break the 60-vote rule for legislation.
By The Editorial Board
June 25, 2020 7:21 pm ET

As progressive radicalism sweeps America’s streets and civil-society institutions, one question is whether its agenda can be translated into law. One obstacle is the Senate filibuster, which constrains partisan majorities by requiring 60 votes for most legislation. But if Democrats take control of the Senate in 2020, expect the rule to be torched as soon as it impedes the Democratic agenda.

The latest indication comes from Delaware Senator Chris Coons, a moderate Democrat with a reputation as an institutionalist who in 2017 along with Maine Republican Susan Collins led an open letter in support of the filibuster. “We are mindful of the unique role the Senate plays in the legislative process,” they wrote in a letter signed by 61 Senators.

But that was when Republicans controlled the Senate. Now Mr. Coons tells Politico, “I will not stand idly by for four years and watch the Biden administration’s initiatives blocked at every turn.” He added: “I am gonna try really hard to find a path forward that doesn’t require removing what’s left of the structural guardrails, but if there’s a Biden administration, it will be inheriting a mess, at home and abroad. It requires urgent and effective action.”

In the Democratic presidential primary, Elizabeth Warren called for getting rid of the filibuster while more moderate candidates like Sen. Cory Booker resisted. Mr. Coons’s apparent change of heart suggests the progressives will have little problem winning out once they are trying to pass legislation they deem “urgent” on a party-line vote. Notably, Mr. Coons is one of Joe Biden’s main Senate confidants.

Perhaps the filibuster’s days have been numbered since then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid axed it for lower-court judges on a party-line vote in 2013. But the result of a unified Democratic government unconstrained by the legislative filibuster could be a dramatic redistribution of political power that most Americans don’t suspect.

Congress could pass statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, tilting the Senate further left. A simple Senate majority could also change the composition of the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. The mere threat of this may already be causing Chief Justice John Roberts to move left.

President Trump has been falling in the polls, and on present trend he’ll take the GOP Senate down to defeat too. The stakes for the upper chamber are far greater than in a typical election, and Republicans will have to start making that case to the voters.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Bongino : crats plan to get rid of fillibuster in Senate
« Reply #728 on: June 29, 2020, 05:05:51 PM »
51 will rule
you can skip the commercials:

https://bongino.com/ep-1285-who-is-really-behind-this-chaos

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #730 on: July 01, 2020, 07:33:28 AM »
I donated to Mia Love a few times, but then I saw her get snarky with President Trump.  Owens winning the primary appears to be very good news.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Cori Bush joins the Squad
« Reply #732 on: August 05, 2020, 11:04:47 PM »
The Squad’s New Member
National progressives topple a third House baron this year.
By WSJ The Editorial Board
Aug. 5, 2020 8:25 pm ET


The big news from the latest round of primary elections on Tuesday was the defeat of 10-term Missouri Congressman William Lacy Clay to a left-wing challenger. This is the third such upset this year, and together they illustrate the Democratic Party’s continuing move to the left and the growing nationalization of House races.

Mr. Clay is a House baron and scion of a St. Louis political dynasty. His father founded the Congressional Black Caucus four decades ago, and he’s a thorough-going liberal, but he was also willing to work with Republicans as he did in late 2018 to pass criminal-justice reform.

Mr. Clay easily fended off a challenge from Black Lives Matter activist Cori Bush in 2018, and he took her seriously in the rematch. But he lost 49%-45.5% after he was targeted by the party’s new and aggressive national progressive groups. One ad hit him for joining House Republicans in 2016 to oppose the Obama Labor Department’s fiduciary rule that harmed savers and retirees.

Mr. Clay tracked to the left by endorsing the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, but he was still considered insufficiently liberal because he didn’t support defunding police like Ms. Bush.

He joins eight-term Illinois Rep. Daniel Lipinski and New York’s 16-termer Eliot Engel in this year’s camp of Democratic incumbent exiles. Mr. Lipinski became a target for his long-held pro-life views while Mr. Engel’s pro-Israel stance offended the new progressive orthodoxy. Mr. Engel’s opponent and likely successor supports a universal basic income and dismantling police, among other progressive fashions.

In other primary news, Detroit Rep. Rashida Tlaib, squad-mate of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, handily beat moderate challenger Brenda Jones, who came close to defeating her two years ago. “If I was considered the most vulnerable member of the Squad, I think it’s safe to say the Squad is here to stay, and it’s only getting bigger,” Ms. Tlaib crowed.

These results will echo through the Democratic House majority and pull it further to the left on policy and make it more partisan on politics. Incumbents will be less inclined to work with Republicans lest they be vulnerable to a primary challenge. Good luck to Speaker Nancy Pelosi in managing a larger squad.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: Cori Bush joins the Squad
« Reply #733 on: August 06, 2020, 04:04:00 AM »
 “If I was considered the most vulnerable member of the Squad, I think it’s safe to say the Squad is here to stay, and it’s only getting bigger,”   Tlaib crowed.

   - Ilhan Omar has a fight as well.  Aug 11.

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #734 on: August 19, 2020, 09:15:13 AM »


This Is a Rough Year to Be a Down-Ticket Republican

North Carolina is a key swing state in the presidential race, has one of the top five or six most important and competitive Senate races this cycle, and also a governor’s race this year. You would think the Republican candidate in the gubernatorial race, Dan Forest, would at least be in the ballpark against incumbent Democrat Roy Cooper. But Forest is trailing badly — by 14 points in the most recent poll, and by 20 in one in July. In the Senate race, incumbent Republican Thom Tillis is doing better, but is consistently trailing by a few points. Tarheel State Republicans have their work cut out for them.

Michigan is a top-tier swing state in this year. Just about every Republican loves John James, the 2018 Senate candidate who outperformed every other Michigan Republican who sought a statewide office and who the GOP believed had a much better shot against the less-well-known incumbent Democrat Gary Peters. So far James is doing . . . eh, maybe okay at best. The CNBC poll shows James trailing by three points, the EPIC/MRA poll has him down by ten, as does the Gravis poll. A CNN poll last month had him down by 16 points.

In Maine, history has demonstrated that incumbent Republican Susan Collins is really, really tough to beat. But she trailed in all four public polls conducted in July by four or five points. It would be foolish to count Collins out, but she’s probably the underdog at this point.

In Arizona, appointed Republican senator Martha McSally would presumably have the advantage of quasi-incumbency as a wind at her back; and McSally only lost her Senate bid in 2018 by 2.3 points. But she consistently trails Democrat Mark Kelly, sometimes by as little as two points, sometimes by as much as twelve points.

In Kansas, the state GOP dodged a metaphorical bullet when Roger Marshall beat Kris Kobach in the Senate primary. The first post-primary poll shows Marshall ahead . . . but only by two points. That could be worse, but it is far from the kinds of leads that Republicans running statewide are used to enjoying in Kansas.

In Iowa, only three polls have been conducted this year, and all of them show incumbent Republican Joni Ernst in a tight race. Every Iowa Republican probably expected a tough race in a state that is proving important for the presidential election as well, but keep in mind six years ago, Ernst’s race was supposed to be close, and she won by more than eight points.

The one recent poll in Colorado’s Senate race put incumbent Republican Cory Gardner down by six points to former governor John Hickenlooper. As grim as that sounds, that’s a dramatic improvement from the spring, when Hickenlooper led by double digits.

Perhaps the most surprising poll result of the cycle was Quinnipiac’s late July, early August poll in South Carolina, showing challenger Jaime Harrison tied with incumbent Republican Lindsey Graham. Previous polls showed Graham ahead by comfortable margins. The jury is still out on whether Quinnipiac detected dramatic movement in what is seen as a deep-red state, or was just an odd outlier. (Perhaps the sample is unrepresentative of who is likely to vote this fall. In that Quinnipiac survey, 31 percent of South Carolinian registered voter respondents self-identified as Republicans; in the 2016 exit poll, 46 percent of South Carolinian voters self-identified as Republicans.)

Georgia has two simultaneous Senate races this year, and incumbent David Purdue is favored over challenger Jon Ossoff. And so far all of the polling shows Purdue ahead . . . by the low-to-mid single digits.

Not all the recent Senate polling shows bad news. The only poll of Minnesota’s Senate race so far this year puts Republican Jason Lewis within three points of Tina Smith, the woman appointed to replace Al Franken. That same survey put Trump within three points in Minnesota. Maybe all the riots in Minneapolis and calls to abolish the police aren’t good for the Democrats up there.

Republicans recently got a pleasant surprise in Montana, when the most recent Emerson poll put incumbent GOP senator Steve Daines ahead by six points over Democrat Steve Bullock, the current governor. An earlier poll had put Bullock ahead by two points.

The last few polls in Texas suggested the talk that Biden could win the Lone Star State was overwrought, and Jon Cornyn is on pace to win comfortably. Right now, it appears Beto O’Rourke’s Senate bid was the high-water mark for Texas Democrats.

The rest of the governor’s races are mostly in deep red states and look pretty safe for Republicans. Mike Parson, who took over in Missouri after Eric Greitens resigned, is looking solid. In Montana, Representative Greg Gianforte is enjoying a lead, although he’s not quite body-slamming his Democratic rival. In New Hampshire, incumbent Republican Chris Sununu is way ahead of both potential Democratic challengers. The only poll in Indiana’s governor’s race so far this year put incumbent Republican Eric Holcomb ahead by 20 points.

We’re just not seeing a lot of public polling for House races. The Democratic firm Public Policy Polling offered a survey showing the open-seat race in Montana is a tie. The Deseret News poll shows Republican Burgess Owens — J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets! — tied with incumbent Democrat Ben McAdams in Utah in Mia Love’s old district. Mariannette Miller-Meeks has a four-point lead in the open-seat race Iowa’s Second District, which would be a GOP pickup.

Add it all up, and it turns into a pretty gloomy outlook for down-ticket Republicans. There are exceptions here and there, but deep red states look a little less red, promising first-term Republicans such as Gardner, Ernst, and Tillis are in tough shape, the purple states look a little more blue, and light blue-ish states where Republicans thought they had a shot look out of reach. Republican governors appear to be doing noticeably better than Republican senators, so maybe this is just a tough year to be associated with the status quo in Washington. Or maybe it’s easier to develop an identity separate from President Trump when you work in a state capital.

This is where someone will insist you can’t trust poll numbers, the polls were wrong before — eh, not so much in 2017, 2018, and 2019 — and Donald Trump will win reelection in a landslide, winning back the House for the GOP and expanding the Republican Senate majority, et cetera. Maybe the nation’s pollsters, large and small, all got together and decided to put their thumbs on the scale to make the numbers look worse for Republicans. The GOP had better hope that’s the case.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
US Congress; Congressional races, US Senate R-MN?
« Reply #735 on: September 03, 2020, 12:59:05 PM »
40% of Minnesotans say Tina who?

Jason Lewis tied in latest poll.  This changes the battleground.

https://secure.winred.com/jason-lewis-for-senate/donate

What difference does control of the US Senate? Supreme Court for one thing.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2020, 01:03:13 PM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #736 on: September 03, 2020, 04:41:34 PM »
My mom wants to make useful donations but at 88 years old is easily scammed. 

Could use the Senate names and legit URLs for

Arizona
North Carolina
Wisconsin
Lindsay Graham

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #737 on: September 04, 2020, 06:13:03 AM »
The big defect in the Dem convention was what was not said, condemning violence, standing up to China, etc.

My complaint with the Republican is what was not said.  The President and the party did not merge the election of the President with the need to win the House and Senate as well in order to govern along with an agenda of what they can accomplish if they win.

Maybe the separation of these races is strategic.  It is Democrats who want to merge the anti-Trump vote with holding the House and taking the Senate.
---
Enter Nancy and the closed salon wash and blow job.  Perhaps her arrogance is our best asset.  The event sounds small and petty but the forced closures are destroying businesses and lives, destroying our country with their arrogance.  Their one size fits all governance, no matter the damage it causes is fully exposed in this one small act.  Americans should send Democrats with all their power and arrogance packing.

Here is Newt opining on this:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/newt-gingrich-heres-why-pelosis-blow-out-could-lead-to-a-blowout-election

Newt Gingrich: Here's why Pelosi's blowout could lead to a blowout election
Pelosi’s aristocratic behavior could have hair-raising consequences for Democrats

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races, DONATE TODAY
« Reply #738 on: September 04, 2020, 07:09:39 AM »
My mom wants to make useful donations but at 88 years old is easily scammed. 

Could use the Senate names and legit URLs for

Arizona
North Carolina
Wisconsin
Lindsay Graham

These are all links directly from their websites, not from advertising.

Martha McSally, Arizona:
https://secure.winred.com/martha-mcsally/donate?utm_medium=website&utm_source=website

Thom Tillis, North Carolina
https://secure.winred.com/thom-tillis/website

No US Senate race in Wisc. this year.
Jason Lewis, MN
https://secure.winred.com/jason-lewis-for-senate/donate

Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
https://secure.winred.com/team-graham/donate

John James, Michigan
https://secure.winred.com/john-james/donate?_ga=2.118003273.1515767453.1599228213-1983601612.1599228213

Susan Collins, Maine
https://secure.winred.com/susan-collins/donate-contributebutton

Cory Gardner, Colorado
https://secure.winred.com/cory-gardner/website/?recurring=true&utm_medium=website&utm_source=header

Steve Daines, Montana
https://secure.winred.com/steve-daines/donate


I thought mom was a Democrat.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2020, 07:11:44 AM by DougMacG »

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #739 on: September 04, 2020, 07:55:11 AM »
THANK YOU.

She was a Democrat in 1968 and 1972 against Nixon.

Somewhere along the way she got hit over the head with a baseball bat in the form of a police raid on her home in upstate NY because the police thought she was dealing drugs out of an brownstone in Harlem she had rehabbed into a rooming house (it was written up in the NYT btw).  They pointed guns at her sweet dog and took her computer and business records and did not give them back until she had to hire a lawyer and sue.

Anyway, she is a STRONG Trump supporter!!!
 

Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Chamber of Commerce betrays itself
« Reply #740 on: September 04, 2020, 08:58:25 AM »
Chamber of Errors
The business lobby abandons free-market principles to back 23 freshman Democrats.

By Kimberley A. Strassel
Sept. 3, 2020 7:09 pm ET

To err is Washington, and even the most seasoned Beltway players can be forgiven the occasional strategic mistake. But deliberately ignoring history, evidence and principle by engaging in an act that undermines one’s reason for existence is another matter. Meet the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The nation’s premier business lobby this week finalized its decision to help re-elect 23 House Democratic freshmen. Most of those endorsed spent their first term reliably voting to end U.S. business as we know it. Of the chamber’s new favorite politicians, 20 have voted to abolish right-to-work states; 18 said yes to a $15-an-hour federal minimum wage; and 14 supported the House’s $3 trillion blowout, styled the Heroes Act—among other votes designed to crush the life out of free markets. This from an organization whose tag line reads “Standing Up for American Enterprise.” These days it’s more like “prostrating ourselves for crumbs.”

OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH
How Would D.C. 'Contextualize' The Washington Monument?


SUBSCRIBE
The old tag line was more befitting of chamber CEO Tom Donohue, the feisty Irishman who as recently as 2008 led the chamber in a full frontal effort to deny Barack Obama a filibuster-proof Senate majority. Today’s chamber reflects the growing influence of Suzanne Clark, who replaced Mr. Donohue as president in 2019, and chief policy officer Neil Bradley. In their choice between defending free enterprise and making nice on the cocktail circuit, the drinks are winning.

The endorsements are best viewed as the chamber leadership’s bow to both political correctness and dubious strategy. Internally, the outfit is increasingly under pressure from tech and Wall Street executives who want a focus on climate change, equal pay and raising energy taxes. The chamber’s website touts its diversity initiatives: “The U.S. Chamber Celebrates Women’s Equality Day.” “At Historic U.S. Chamber Headquarters, Temporary Art Installation Celebrates Black Lives Matter Voices.” Good luck finding a policy paper on, say, the economic cost of a higher gasoline tax (a levy the chamber supports these days).

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP
Opinion: Morning Editorial Report
All the day's Opinion headlines.

PREVIEW
SUBSCRIBED
Externally, the chamber is falling for the old tried-and-failed belief that it can buy goodwill by making nice to swing-seat Democrats in the majority. The 23 endorsements are supposed to prove that the chamber is truly bipartisan and that it maintains distance from Republicans—and thus persuade Democrats to work with the chamber to modulate the latest progressive promises to double corporate taxation, jail CEO “polluters” and eliminate fossil fuels.

History shows otherwise. The chamber’s golden era was the 1980s, when its commitment to free-market principle made it a powerhouse. Its chief economist, Richard Rahn, with the support of President Richard Lesher, produced an economic platform that was solidly for lower taxes, less regulation and free trade. The chamber was able to brush aside the special pleadings of this or that industry, even as it demonstrated bipartisanship, for instance by opposing the 1982 Reagan tax increase. While other trade organizations cut deals, the chamber did not—and that made it a force to reckon with.

The chamber’s clout waned with the elevation of William Archey, who subscribed to the make-nice strategy, to the position of senior vice president for policy and congressional affairs. In 1993 the chamber threw itself behind Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan, as well as other Democratic policies. It never got anything in return, though the chamber’s members did revolt, resigning in droves. The board dumped Archey in 1994, and Mr. Lesher followed in 1997. That’s how Mr. Donahue came by his job.

The chamber is now repeating history. Local chambers and members across the country are furious that this week’s endorsements stack the decks against true free-market candidates. Letters are pouring in; members are threatening to quit. It’s not the party affiliation; they approve of the chamber supporting free-market Democrats. They complain that the chamber juked free-marketeers by changing its scorecard formula to ease the path for Democratic endorsements. Instead of measuring members purely on votes, the chamber now awards points for “leadership” and “bipartisanship.” That’s how a business lobby ends up endorsing members who voted for the February PRO Act, which would eliminate right to work, independent contractors and secret ballots in union elections.

Mostly, they want to know how the chamber could be so gullible as to think these Democrats will stand with business when it counts. Sure, Speaker Nancy Pelosi will cut a few loose here or there to burnish their “moderate” credentials. But she will never allow them to cost her a floor vote.

Supporters will argue the chamber isn’t spending any money on House races. What really counts, they say, is the chamber’s support for continued GOP control of the Senate. Tell that to companies in those swing districts left at the mercy of their antibusiness Democratic representatives.

It’s hard to see what the chamber accomplished with this week’s move. Democrats will continue to shut its doors to the chamber, though now Republicans will too. That’s what comes with putting politics ahead of principle.

Write to kim@wsj.com.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72258
    • View Profile
Sen. Ben Sasse: Make Senate Great Again
« Reply #742 on: September 09, 2020, 08:52:37 AM »
Make the Senate Great Again
To restore the world’s greatest deliberative body, we need to think big.
By Ben Sasse
Sept. 8, 2020 2:19 pm ET
SAVE
PRINT
TEXT
479




ILLUSTRATION: BARBARA KELLEY
What would the Founding Fathers think of America if they came back to life? Their eyes would surely bug out first at our technology and wealth. But I suspect they’d also be stunned by the deformed structure of our government. The Congress they envisioned is all but dead. The Senate in particular is supposed to be the place where Americans hammer out our biggest challenges with debate. That hasn’t happened for decades—and the rot is bipartisan.

OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH
Trump And Biden, With Eight Weeks Left


SUBSCRIBE
Many on the left think the problem is the filibuster, which requires a supermajority to end debate and enact most legislation. But ending the filibuster would allow political parties to change the direction of the country dramatically with a succession of shifting 51-49 votes. That’s a path to even more polarization and instability. The Senate’s culture needs dramatic change aimed at promoting debate, not ending it. Here are some ideas:

• Cut the cameras. Most of what happens in committee hearings isn’t oversight, it’s showmanship. Senators make speeches that get chopped up, shipped to home-state TV stations, and blasted across social media. They aren’t trying to learn from witnesses, uncover details, or improve legislation. They’re competing for sound bites.

There’s one notable exception: The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the majority of whose work is done in secret. Without posturing for cameras, Republicans and Democrats cooperate on some of America’s most complicated and urgent problems. Other committees could follow their example, while keeping transparency by making transcripts and real-time audio available to the public.

NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP
Opinion: Morning Editorial Report
All the day's Opinion headlines.

PREVIEW
SUBSCRIBED
• Abolish standing committees. The Senate is supposed to be the world’s greatest deliberative body, but it operates on about 20 permanent fiefdoms. Dividing legislative work is important, but there’s no corporation that would tackle its problems by creating 20 permanent committees and running every decision through them. The Senate should instead create temporary two-year committees, each devoted to making real progress on one or two big problems. Committees should draw power from their accomplishments, not based on which industries need to supplicate before the gavel.

• Pack the floor. Serious debate happens only if senators show up. Ninety-nine percent of the time you see a senator talking on the floor, he’s speaking to a chamber with somewhere between zero and two colleagues present. The Senate’s rules privilege the majority, which controls the agenda and floor time. Senators ought to be packed on the floor having real debates. We can do that by changing the rules to allow committees to control some floor time. Elections have consequences, so the majority leader should control the majority of the Senate’s time, but committees should be able to command specific times for specific debates.

• Live together. A lot of time is spent demonizing the opposition, but most senators can get along quite well. Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii is as liberal as the day is long, but he’s my friend. Senators should live, eat, and meet in dormitories when the Senate is in session. It’s hard to demonize people you spend time with every day.

• Cancel re-election. One of the biggest reasons Congress gives away its power to the executive branch is that it’s politically expedient for both parties to avoid the decisions that come from the work of legislating. Lawmakers are obsessed with staying in office, and one of the easiest ways to keep getting re-elected is by avoiding hard decisions. We ought to propose a constitutional amendment to limit every senator to one term, but we should double it from six years to 12. Senators who don’t have to worry about short-term popularity can work instead on long-term challenges.

If that’s a bridge too far, at least ban fundraising while the Senate is in session in Washington. It’s an everyday experience to sit down at a $2,000-a-plate lunch fundraiser and then run over to make committee votes. Lobbying is protected by the First Amendment, but it shouldn’t be the primary focus of senators when we’ve got work to do.

• Repeal the 17th Amendment. Ratified in 1912, it replaced the appointment of senators by state legislatures with direct election. Different states bring different solutions to the table, and that ought to be reflected in the Senate’s national debate. The old saying used to be that all politics is local, but today—thanks to the internet, 24/7 cable news and a cottage industry dedicated to political addiction—politics is polarized and national. That would change if state legislatures had direct control over who serves in the Senate.

• Sunset everything. For decades Pennsylvania Avenue has been a one-way street, as authority flowed from Congress to the executive branch. When the unelected bureaucracy gets power, it doesn’t let go. We ought to end that by having the Senate create a “super committee” dedicated to reviewing all such delegations of power over the past 80 years and then proposing legislation to sunset the authority of entire bureaucracies on a rolling basis. Does, say, the Health and Human Services Department ever answer for its aggressive regulatory lawmaking? Of course not. Sunset all its authority in 12 months and watch lawmakers start to make actual laws.

• Make a real budget. The power of the purse is Congress’s primary lever—and the area where Congress is most unserious. The budget process is completely broken, and every couple of months lawmakers are faced with a monumentally stupid decision: Shut the government down or spend 102% of what was spent last year, with no oversight. It’s an endless series of all-or-nothing brinkmanship fights—continuing resolutions, omnibus spending deals and debt-ceiling hikes. We ought to fix that with two-year budgeting that includes all federal spending, including on entitlements. We ought to end the distinction between appropriation and authorization. Legislation that authorizes federal action should also appropriate the money to pay for it.

These aren’t partisan proposals, because congressional dysfunction isn’t a partisan problem. Lawmakers—Republicans and Democrats—don’t make laws. Over years, Congress made the choice to shirk its duty and cede power to the executive branch. Recovery will be hard, but it’s time for Congress build some muscle and figure out how to serve the American people by doing our constitutionally mandated jobs again.

Mr. Sasse, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Nebraska.

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races, Pelosi
« Reply #743 on: September 10, 2020, 05:28:08 AM »
“A woman who is 3rd in line to have access to our nuclear codes is claiming that she was duped by a hair salon. Let that sink in.”

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Beautiful on outside (with lots of artificial help and ugly as sin inside)
« Reply #744 on: September 10, 2020, 07:50:51 AM »
Like the metaphor

take away all the makeup and her real ugliness just reeks:

https://twitter.com/mightybusterbro/status/1246484010458644481

I suspect this is photoshopped but we know she must looks something like this - that is why she needed to put on a beautiful face - to cover up all the damn ugliness behind her phony veneer.


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: Beautiful on outside (with lots of artificial help and ugly as sin inside)
« Reply #745 on: September 10, 2020, 08:58:28 AM »
Without work done, the picture might be about right.  Nothing wrong with aging as we all go through it.  It's her policies and her hatred of us that's ugly.

Funny how seemingly small things become gigantic.  For all she's done wrong, the haircut might be what costs them the House and saves the republic.

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19756
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #746 on: September 10, 2020, 09:17:52 AM »
".Nothing wrong with aging as we all go through it "

yes .  but some age more gracefully than others.  :wink:


DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Re: The US Congress; Congressional races
« Reply #748 on: September 16, 2020, 06:42:15 AM »
Running against Ilhan Omar in Minneapolis is a black businessman from the northside, Lacy Johnson.  He can't win but is deserving of your support.  People need to hear and consider another voice.
https://www.lacyjohnson.com/
https://secure.winred.com/lacy-johnson-for-congress/donate

Running against pretend centrist Dean Phillips, wealthy decendent of Big-Vodka, in my 2018 flipped suburban district is black businessman Kendall Quails.  I suppose he is also a long shot because of the expanding socialism in the wealthy inner suburbs, but deserves all the support he can get:
https://kendallforcongress.com/
https://secure.winred.com/kendall-for-congress/donate

Black lives matter or just Black Leftism matters?  How about celebrating and elevating some of the successful ones as leaders and role models?!

DougMacG

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19442
    • View Profile
Senate confirmation process, lose support of 6 Republicans and still confirm
« Reply #749 on: September 21, 2020, 10:36:47 AM »
If let's say Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney (and up to three others) abstain / vote present in the confirmation instead of voting no - because they don't like the timing or the process, the vote would be 47-47 with the tie breaker going to VP Mike Pence.  The Justice is confirmed.