Author Topic: Transgender Issues; pedophilia, grooming, and the sexualization of children  (Read 73274 times)



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
What is the name of the WSJ pedophile pizzagate story?


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: June 08, 2023, 04:33:24 AM by Crafty_Dog »


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Thank you.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
PP: Media approved language
« Reply #408 on: June 08, 2023, 01:24:59 PM »
Third

Why Approved Media Language Matters
The AP's recent updated guidance on transgenderism betrays its bias and negatively affects conservative free speech.

Nate Jackson


Who cares what the Associated Press style manual says? That may be the question on the minds of many conservatives, but we can assure you it matters a great deal, whether or not you read the AP.

For one thing, the AP stylebook is the most common set of journalistic guidelines used by news outlets across the political spectrum (though, for the record, not including The Patriot Post). That doesn't mean conservative organizations use everything in that manual without modification, but the influence is still there, as are the stories themselves, which are often simply republished on various websites.

For another, social media thought police rely on supposedly "objective" sources like the AP when deciding what opinions to silence.

It's a racketeering operation. Media rating organizations hire left-wing former journalists to look at the standards and practices of Leftmedia outfits, declare them to be the gold standard, and then rate those organizations highly for having adhered to their own rules. Conservative outlets, which exist in the first place as a counter to mainstream media bias, often don't adhere to those same standards and openly declare their bias in order to stand against the Left. So, the leftist journalists who declared themselves gatekeepers use their purported authority to give conservatives demerits for not adhering to left-wing rules.

Your humble team here has experience with this protection racket. Last year, we were downgraded by the hacks at NewsGuard, a news rating "authority" used by social media, and one of our "offenses" is practically straight out of the AP style guide. We allegedly used "homophobic" and "transphobic" language — terms that betray a clear political bias of their own.

Which brings us back to that AP guide.

The AP recently published its Transgender Coverage Topical Guide, which expands the grip of the Rainbow Mafia over how the news media may talk about the Rainbow Mafia.

We can understand avoiding admittedly politically charged words like "groomer" or "mutilation" when talking about this stuff. The AP is supposed to produce straight news, after all, not political analysis like we do. Yet the AP insists on calling "groomer" an "often false" term, and if a reporter must quote someone using it, that reporter must include an immediate "fact-check" like this: "using a term that falsely links LGBTQ+ people's interactions with children to the actions of child molesters." Yes, opponents of sexual abuse of any type intentionally use that term because that's what we think is happening. An opinion is not "false" just because the AP doesn't like that opinion, but that's the game these racketeers play.

Furthermore, here are a few examples of things that betray the AP's clear political bias and agenda:

Use preferred pronouns, the style guide says, but just don't call them that. Instead, say things like "the pronouns they use, whose pronouns are, who uses the pronouns." (That's funny — the AP refers to self-identified pro-lifers as "anti-abortion." Why can't we choose our own label?)

Use "gender-affirming care" to describe various medical treatments from puberty blockers to hormones to surgery that are used to change gender and often leave patients with lifelong health problems from scarring to infertility. How is that "affirming" again?

"Avoid terms like biological sex, along with biological male and biological female, which opponents of transgender rights sometimes use to refer to transgender women and transgender men, respectively."

"Avoid references to a transgender person being born a boy or girl, or phrasing like birth gender." Instead, "Sex assigned at birth is the accurate terminology." In fact, the AP tells its reporters, "Sex is usually assigned at birth by parents or attendants, sometimes inaccurately."

Inaccurately? Call us crazy, but it's not that difficult to tell the difference between genitalia.

It sure is hard to pin down a science denier. The Rainbow Mafia is always screaming about how sex is different from gender because the former is biology and the latter is identity. Indeed, the AP says "sex is inherently biological." But if someone is "assigned" sex at birth, doesn't that also make sex a social construct? And why is the way to correct this "inaccuracy" to "transition" a person to the opposite sex gender?

"Avoid references to both, either or opposite sexes or genders." Oh.

Perhaps the most revealing AP style item is this: "Do not use the term transgenderism, which frames transgender identity as an ideology."

Well, it is an ideology, though it's also more than that — it's a cult. We say so because it has all the markings of one, including demanding approved language and subjecting adherents to degrading humiliation and/or self-harm to show devotion to the cause.

Yet the AP wants to avoid even hinting at that truth in its reporting and in fact essentially instructs its reporters to join the cult. The rest of us pay the price by at best getting biased news and at worst not even being allowed to disagree. The AP is thus, as Thomas Jefferson once lamented, one of the "chimnies to carry off noxious vapors and smoke."


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19772
    • View Profile
" rainbow mafia"

not bad

I still like

"alphabet mafia "

a bit more though.  :wink:


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 05:23:10 PM by Crafty_Dog »

ccp

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 19772
    • View Profile
only lying shysters can call this a "civil rights issue "

so ok for the rights of parents to be stripped

and provided to teachers or government employees

 :x



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Intelligent.

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The flag of conquest
« Reply #417 on: June 12, 2023, 11:05:27 PM »






Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
NRO: CA is losing its mind
« Reply #423 on: June 15, 2023, 03:41:01 PM »
OLITICS & POLICY
California Is Losing Its Mind
By THE EDITORS
June 14, 2023 6:30 AM

ACalifornia bill, AB 957, would require family courts to interpret a child’s “health, safety, and welfare” to “include a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity” for the purpose of custody disputes.


The bill, which has already passed the state assembly, was sponsored by Assemblymember Lori Wilson, who encouraged the transition of her own child, and who would like to see similar laws enacted in every state. It is of a piece with last year’s trans-tourism bill, encouraging out-of-state minors to travel to California to undergo transition treatments behind their parents’ backs, as well as a bill passed earlier this year requiring foster parents to agree to “best practices for providing care for LGBTQ+ youth,” including — of course — “gender-affirming care.”

Already we have seen the toxic effects of gender ideology infiltrating family law. Across the country, activist-minded judges are penalizing parents who don’t accept the claims of trans activists. Judges in California, Illinois, and Texas have denied custody rights to divorced parents opposed to, or even skeptical of, their child’s transition. In some cases, judges have received special “training” on these matters from transgender activists.

AB 957 goes even further than favoring one divorced parent over another for political reasons. In interpreting the refusal to affirm a gender identity as an affront to a child’s “health, safety and welfare,” the bill effectively defines non-affirmation as abuse, creating a precedent for much broader applications. If a parent can lose custody rights after a divorce for not affirming his or her child, what’s to stop the state from removing children from happily married or even single parents?

This is happening already in some jurisdictions. Take Abigail Martinez, a single mother of four, living in Los Angeles, Calif., whose trans-identifying teenager was removed from her custody in 2016 by a judge interpreting non-affirmation as “emotional abuse.” Oddly, the judge permitted Martinez to retain custody of her other three children and to continue working as a nanny. After three years of her daughter living in state custody and undergoing hormone treatments, the abuse charges against Martinez were changed by the Department of Child and Family Services from “substantiated” to “inconclusive.” But too late; the damage was already done. One month later, her daughter — by then a severely depressed 19-year-old who’d spent critical years away from her loving family — took her own life by kneeling in front of a freight train.

Laws like AB 957 would make stories like that of Martinez less an egregious outlier and closer to the new legal norm. In demanding parental affirmation, the bill sets no requirements for clinical evaluations and includes no mention of mental-health comorbidities. Whether they’re depressed, autistic, bullied, or sexual-abuse survivors: If children say they’re trans — they are trans. End of discussion.

Under such a broad definition of child abuse, even the wider community — schools, churches, and other organizations — could be obliged to “affirm.” And all this while — as we noted in our editorial yesterday — the global credibility of the “gender-affirming” model is crumbling. On trans issues, California is losing its collective mind.



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Transgender Treatment in Children Leads to Lifelong Medical Side Effects
HEALTH
Beth Brelje
Beth Brelje, Reporter
Jun 14 2023
biggersmaller
A view of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in October 2021. (Google Street View)
A view of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in October 2021. (Google Street View)

0:00
9:06



1

Altering the appearance of one’s gender through hormone treatment or surgery is a permanent decision with lifelong health consequences that go beyond cosmetics.

Brittle bones, affected brain development, and the loss of a functioning reproductive system are among the possible side effects of gender transition.


It is crucial for those seeking treatment for gender dysphoria to consider the lifelong consequences of such treatments, but that is a tall order for young patients with still developing brains and bones and who have not yet hit puberty.

It is also a tough task for those on the autism spectrum, who are seen at a higher rate in the transgender community compared to the general population, according to doctors at the Gender and Sexuality Development Program at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), speaking in a Pennsylvania taxpayer-funded series of transgender therapy training workshops for workers in health care and education.

Reversible Treatment Leads to Irreversible Outcomes
The CHOP trainings teach mental health providers to treat children under age 8, first with reversible methods such as “acceptance and affirmation.” The training advises professionals to guide families through social gender transition by choosing a name, haircut, clothing style, and public bathroom of the gender the child wants to be. Not considering mental health effects, these strategies can be reversed.

But puberty blocker medicines may start between ages 8–14. Ages 14 and up can be treated with testosterone, estrogen, and “gender affirming surgeries,” the training advises.

The decision to give a child puberty blockers can have permanent effects.

Puberty blockers can “put the pause button” on puberty, giving children more time to explore their gender identity, the training claims, and prevent children from the development of “irreversible secondary sex characteristics,” such as the natural development of breasts or deepening of the voice. If these characteristics never develop, the child may not need surgery later, the training indicates.

Higher Risk of Bone Fractures
Hormones are needed to build bone during puberty, so children taking puberty blockers will have weaker bones during development and throughout adulthood, putting them at higher risk of bone fractures, said Dr. Zachary McClain in one of the trainings. McClain is assistant professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine and program director of adolescent medicine.

“What we know about puberty blockers is that they actually lower your bone mineral density during puberty,” McClain said. “But the good news is, when we start back with cross-sex hormones, with either estrogen or testosterone, that bone density goes right back up. Does it go back up to someone who’s never been on puberty blockers? Probably not. There was one study that did show that it didn’t go back up to cisgender youth who just went through a normal cycle of puberty.”

Blockers may also stall cognitive brain development, McClain said.

“It’s not going to change how smart they are, but there is this abstract cognitive development that we’re just not sure about. … Some of the science is there, some of the science isn’t there, but we know in general, these are safe,” said McClain.

Puberty blockers are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in gender transition, the training said.

Children on puberty blockers may be shorter than their peers. They will grow at the slower, pre-puberty rate, and grow faster once they are on cross-sex hormones, he said.

Those undergoing gender treatments have an increased risk of mental health challenges, including more anxiety disorders, mood disorders and a higher rate for suicide, and there are more instances of autism than in the general population.

Informed Consent
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) recommends in its eighth Standards of Care report that doctors ensure patients understand the effect of gender treatment on reproduction before beginning treatment.

“Gender-affirming medical interventions often affect reproductive capacity,” the report said. For example, removal of testicles is irreversible and leads to loss of fertility and loss of the effects of endogenous sex steroids.

Clinical data indicate that after gender care, transgender people score significantly lower in sexual pleasure compared to cisgender individuals, and they should be informed before treatment.

But transgender women can still get pregnant, even while taking testosterone.

“We recommend medical providers discuss contraception methods with transgender and gender diverse people who engage in sexual activity that can result in pregnancy,” the report said. Transgender individuals may retain reproductive capacity, and may experience unplanned pregnancies due to an erroneous assumption that testosterone is a reliable form of contraception.

“Transgender men and … people who use testosterone should be informed 1) although quantities are small, testosterone does pass through chest/breast milk; and 2) the impact on the developing neonate/child is unknown, and therefore gender-affirming testosterone use is not recommended during lactation.”

Testosterone therapy may cause high cholesterol and estrogen may cause blood clots. Other hormone therapies can cause weight gain, depression, increased frequency of urination, low blood pressure, and the onset of osteoporosis.

There will be more doctors visits. Women who surgically add male genitalia should expect lifelong urological follow-up appointments. Men who surgically add female genitalia will still need regular prostate exams plus gynecologic exams to check for complications.

The report says a small percentage, between 0.3 percent and 3.8 percent, will regret their decision to change the appearance of their gender.

Regret can be temporary or permanent and may be classified as social regret, often caused by difficulties in familial, religious, social, or professional life; medical regret, due to long-term medical complications, disappointment in surgical results or inadequate preoperative decision-making; and true gender-related regret, mostly based on patient-experienced misdiagnosis, insufficient exploration of gender identity, or both, the report said.

Alternative Decision Maker
Within transgender treatment circles there are discussions about the importance of informed consent, the ethical principle that recipients of health care should understand the health care they receive and any potential consequences that could result, according to the WPATH report.

“It is important to recognize mental illness, in particular symptoms of cognitive impairment or psychosis, can impact a person’s ability to grant consent for gender-affirming medical and/or surgical treatments (GAMSTs). However, the presence of such symptoms does not necessarily equate to an inability to give consent because many people with significant mental health symptoms are able to understand the risks and benefits of treatment enough to make an informed decision,” the report said.

The report added that it is important that a careful assessment is done, examining a person’s ability to comprehend the nature of the treatment being considered, consider treatment options, including risks and benefits, appreciate the potential short- and long-term consequences of the decision, and communicate their choice in order to receive the treatment.

The report recommends mental health professionals address mental health symptoms that interfere with a person’s capacity to consent to gender-affirming treatment before treatment is initiated.

“There may be instances in which an individual lacks the capacity to consent to health care, such as during an acute episode of psychosis or in situations where an individual has long-term cognitive impairment. However, limits to capacity to consent to treatment should not prevent individuals from receiving appropriate GAMSTs,” the WPATH report said. “For some, understanding the risks and benefits may require the use of repeated explanations in jargon-free language over time, or the use of diagrams to facilitate explanation and aid comprehension.”

In some cases, an alternative decision maker, such as a legal guardian or regulator-approved, independent decision maker may need to be appointed, the report said.

The goal is to provide “the most affirmative and least restrictive health care.”

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile
The left destroys individuals just as it destroys cities, states and nations.


Transgender Treatment in Children Leads to Lifelong Medical Side Effects
HEALTH
Beth Brelje
Beth Brelje, Reporter
Jun 14 2023
biggersmaller
A view of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in October 2021. (Google Street View)
A view of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in October 2021. (Google Street View)

0:00
9:06



1

Altering the appearance of one’s gender through hormone treatment or surgery is a permanent decision with lifelong health consequences that go beyond cosmetics.

Brittle bones, affected brain development, and the loss of a functioning reproductive system are among the possible side effects of gender transition.


It is crucial for those seeking treatment for gender dysphoria to consider the lifelong consequences of such treatments, but that is a tall order for young patients with still developing brains and bones and who have not yet hit puberty.

It is also a tough task for those on the autism spectrum, who are seen at a higher rate in the transgender community compared to the general population, according to doctors at the Gender and Sexuality Development Program at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), speaking in a Pennsylvania taxpayer-funded series of transgender therapy training workshops for workers in health care and education.

Reversible Treatment Leads to Irreversible Outcomes
The CHOP trainings teach mental health providers to treat children under age 8, first with reversible methods such as “acceptance and affirmation.” The training advises professionals to guide families through social gender transition by choosing a name, haircut, clothing style, and public bathroom of the gender the child wants to be. Not considering mental health effects, these strategies can be reversed.

But puberty blocker medicines may start between ages 8–14. Ages 14 and up can be treated with testosterone, estrogen, and “gender affirming surgeries,” the training advises.

The decision to give a child puberty blockers can have permanent effects.

Puberty blockers can “put the pause button” on puberty, giving children more time to explore their gender identity, the training claims, and prevent children from the development of “irreversible secondary sex characteristics,” such as the natural development of breasts or deepening of the voice. If these characteristics never develop, the child may not need surgery later, the training indicates.

Higher Risk of Bone Fractures
Hormones are needed to build bone during puberty, so children taking puberty blockers will have weaker bones during development and throughout adulthood, putting them at higher risk of bone fractures, said Dr. Zachary McClain in one of the trainings. McClain is assistant professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine and program director of adolescent medicine.

“What we know about puberty blockers is that they actually lower your bone mineral density during puberty,” McClain said. “But the good news is, when we start back with cross-sex hormones, with either estrogen or testosterone, that bone density goes right back up. Does it go back up to someone who’s never been on puberty blockers? Probably not. There was one study that did show that it didn’t go back up to cisgender youth who just went through a normal cycle of puberty.”

Blockers may also stall cognitive brain development, McClain said.

“It’s not going to change how smart they are, but there is this abstract cognitive development that we’re just not sure about. … Some of the science is there, some of the science isn’t there, but we know in general, these are safe,” said McClain.

Puberty blockers are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in gender transition, the training said.

Children on puberty blockers may be shorter than their peers. They will grow at the slower, pre-puberty rate, and grow faster once they are on cross-sex hormones, he said.

Those undergoing gender treatments have an increased risk of mental health challenges, including more anxiety disorders, mood disorders and a higher rate for suicide, and there are more instances of autism than in the general population.

Informed Consent
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) recommends in its eighth Standards of Care report that doctors ensure patients understand the effect of gender treatment on reproduction before beginning treatment.

“Gender-affirming medical interventions often affect reproductive capacity,” the report said. For example, removal of testicles is irreversible and leads to loss of fertility and loss of the effects of endogenous sex steroids.

Clinical data indicate that after gender care, transgender people score significantly lower in sexual pleasure compared to cisgender individuals, and they should be informed before treatment.

But transgender women can still get pregnant, even while taking testosterone.

“We recommend medical providers discuss contraception methods with transgender and gender diverse people who engage in sexual activity that can result in pregnancy,” the report said. Transgender individuals may retain reproductive capacity, and may experience unplanned pregnancies due to an erroneous assumption that testosterone is a reliable form of contraception.

“Transgender men and … people who use testosterone should be informed 1) although quantities are small, testosterone does pass through chest/breast milk; and 2) the impact on the developing neonate/child is unknown, and therefore gender-affirming testosterone use is not recommended during lactation.”

Testosterone therapy may cause high cholesterol and estrogen may cause blood clots. Other hormone therapies can cause weight gain, depression, increased frequency of urination, low blood pressure, and the onset of osteoporosis.

There will be more doctors visits. Women who surgically add male genitalia should expect lifelong urological follow-up appointments. Men who surgically add female genitalia will still need regular prostate exams plus gynecologic exams to check for complications.

The report says a small percentage, between 0.3 percent and 3.8 percent, will regret their decision to change the appearance of their gender.

Regret can be temporary or permanent and may be classified as social regret, often caused by difficulties in familial, religious, social, or professional life; medical regret, due to long-term medical complications, disappointment in surgical results or inadequate preoperative decision-making; and true gender-related regret, mostly based on patient-experienced misdiagnosis, insufficient exploration of gender identity, or both, the report said.

Alternative Decision Maker
Within transgender treatment circles there are discussions about the importance of informed consent, the ethical principle that recipients of health care should understand the health care they receive and any potential consequences that could result, according to the WPATH report.

“It is important to recognize mental illness, in particular symptoms of cognitive impairment or psychosis, can impact a person’s ability to grant consent for gender-affirming medical and/or surgical treatments (GAMSTs). However, the presence of such symptoms does not necessarily equate to an inability to give consent because many people with significant mental health symptoms are able to understand the risks and benefits of treatment enough to make an informed decision,” the report said.

The report added that it is important that a careful assessment is done, examining a person’s ability to comprehend the nature of the treatment being considered, consider treatment options, including risks and benefits, appreciate the potential short- and long-term consequences of the decision, and communicate their choice in order to receive the treatment.

The report recommends mental health professionals address mental health symptoms that interfere with a person’s capacity to consent to gender-affirming treatment before treatment is initiated.

“There may be instances in which an individual lacks the capacity to consent to health care, such as during an acute episode of psychosis or in situations where an individual has long-term cognitive impairment. However, limits to capacity to consent to treatment should not prevent individuals from receiving appropriate GAMSTs,” the WPATH report said. “For some, understanding the risks and benefits may require the use of repeated explanations in jargon-free language over time, or the use of diagrams to facilitate explanation and aid comprehension.”

In some cases, an alternative decision maker, such as a legal guardian or regulator-approved, independent decision maker may need to be appointed, the report said.

The goal is to provide “the most affirmative and least restrictive health care.”



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Matt Walsh: FOX goes full DEI
« Reply #430 on: June 17, 2023, 12:12:42 AM »
The Matt Walsh Report
The Betrayal At Fox News Is Even Worse Than We Imagined
For 120 straight weeks, Fox News was the most-watched cable news network in primetime. Its main competitors, MSNBC and CNN, never came close. In the key advertising demographic — people between the ages of 25 and 54 — Fox News was the undisputed leader.

But last week, after nearly two months of declining ratings following the ouster of Tucker Carlson, Fox News’ streak came to an abrupt and very unceremonious end. Last Friday, Fox News recorded its worst performance in primetime in the network's history. Just 109,000 people between the ages of 25 to 54 tuned into Tucker Carlson's old 8:00p.m. time slot, to watch the replacement show "Fox News Tonight."

How bad is that? To put it in context, "Fox News Tonight" was ranked 41st out of all cable news shows on Friday. This is the time slot that used to routinely be ranked number one. Now YouTube streams of people playing with Legos get more viewers. And keep in mind — Fox News attracted those 109,000 viewers on a very busy news night, after the announcement of Donald Trump’s indictment. Not many people cared what Fox News anchors had to say about the indictment of a presidential frontrunner.

Whatever you make of that, it’s clear that the implosion of Fox News is well underway. And it’s showing no signs of stopping. This week, as Tucker discussed on his Twitter show Thursday, Fox News executives publicly condemned a veteran producer who wrote a banner criticizing Joe Biden. Five years ago, the banner wouldn’t have attracted any attention whatsoever. But under the current leadership at Fox News, it led to the producer leaving the network within 48 hours. Here’s Tucker:

Clip 1

That banner is the most interesting thing that’s happened in that time slot for about two months, so of course Fox News cracks down on it. What’s happening at Fox feels familiar. The network is on the same trajectory we saw with Bud Light, then Target. Fox News executives, for some reason, are destroying their own product, and now they've lost the trust of their customer base. They didn’t just fire their top-performing host in the single most important hour in television, without providing any justification for it. Now they’re punishing producers too. They’ve also been relentlessly promoting transgenderism across all their platforms. They’ve made Caitlyn Jenner one of their top contributors. In every article about Dylan Mulvaney, or any other trans activist, they diligently make sure to respect their preferred pronouns.

Fox News’ parent company, Fox Corporation, is even sponsoring a pride parade. All of this is driving Fox News’ viewers away. It’s hard not to wonder what’s happening at Fox News, and whether there’s any chance the company —– which was once trusted by millions of people —– can ever recover.

We just obtained a series of internal documents from Fox News employees that illustrate how deep the rot goes, and how unsalvageable the whole organization truly is. These are documents that are produced by Fox Corporation, and presented to Fox News employees when they login to their employee portal. Any Fox News employee can access them. I encourage you to read the entire thread on Twitter and get all the facts on the story. I must warn you, though, what we found included very sexually explicit content. I don’t have to tell you that I have a lot to say about that.

The documents show that the leadership of Fox Corporation despises their viewers, and everything they stand for. This is a company that abhors not only traditional values, but also basic human decency, it would seem. Am I overstating things? Let's see. In honor of Pride Month, Fox Corporation is now encouraging employees of Fox News to read literature about “glory holes.” You read that right. These are literal holes in restroom walls where men anonymously receive oral sex. Fox's executives want their employees to learn all about them. Now if you went up to a co-worker and started talking in graphic detail about “glory holes,” you’d get hit with a sexual harassment lawsuit. But this is what Fox is telling its employees to read. And that's not the only pornographic topic Fox is pushing on its workers.

In addition to the porn, Fox is also encouraging everyone at the company to donate to organizations that administer sterilizing hormones to young people —– including homeless youth. This is something that, on-air, Fox News occasionally pretends is a bad thing. But internally, Fox Corp. is promoting it, with enthusiasm. Pull back the curtain, and there's not much daylight between the Fox boardroom and the faculty lounge at U.C. Berkeley.

Actually, in some respects, Fox is even worse than Berkeley. Fox has gone high-tech with its DEI agenda. Just in case any employees at the network stepped out of line, the documents we've obtained also show that Fox leadership experimented with an artificial intelligence program that pushes "diversity, equity and inclusion" in the workplace. The AI, called Eskalera, advertises that it can track the progress of organizations towards certain “DEI” goals. That’s its main function.

Yesterday we uploaded the documents outlining all of this on my Twitter feed. You can check them out there if you haven’t already. Again, the materials come from Fox's employee portal. Here's a screenshot of one of the documents:

Clip 2

You can see that Fox Corp encourages its employees to donate to a variety of organizations, and says it will even help match funds to these groups. Let's go through a couple of them.

According to Fox, employees should donate to the Trevor Project, because it's supposedly devoted to helping "LGBTQ young people ages 13-24." How exactly does the Trevor Project help these youths? As the National Review reported recently, they run a chat room that allows 13-year-olds to connect with LGBTQ adults to talk about sexually explicit topics. As the National Review put it, it's a "pandora's box of depravity." Reportedly, there’s no age requirement or verification whatsoever. In many cases, these adults tell children in the chatroom how to obtain medications, and products like chest binders, without alerting their parents.

One chat from an adult, which children could see, began with the adult talking about his urge to masturbate — it goes on from there in graphic detail. In another chat hosted by the Trevor Project, an adult starts talking about "doggystyle," and a user under the age of 18 responds, saying he also wants to try it. None of this is new information, by the way. It's been reported for months. Fox wants their employees to support the Trevor Project anyway.

They're also telling employees to donate to the Ali Forney Center. That's a group that says it takes care of homeless young people. On their Twitter account, the Ali Forney Center boasts about injecting these young people with cross-sex hormones — hormones that will sterilize them. They say they provide "life-saving services like hormone replacement therapy for our young people."

Clip 3

So they're taking at-risk youth, and they appear to admit that they’re flooding their bodies with irreversible chemicals. This is all right out in the open. And Fox supports it.

As if to erase any doubt about that, Fox also encourages donations to the Los Angeles LGBT Center, which openly brags about giving hormones to children. They even uploaded a video of a mother "surprising her trans daughter with first dose of hormones."

Clip 4

YouTube took down that video for terms of service violations, but a screenshot is still on Twitter. By itself, all of this is alarming. Again, Fox is matching employee donations to these far Left groups. How much of your monthly cable bill is funding this barbarism? And why exactly are Fox executives taking the position that their employees should support the chemical sterilization of minors?

We obtained other documents from the Fox employee portal, and after reviewing those documents, the answer is obvious — to me anyway — Fox is run by a bunch of highly dedicated, godless perverts. There's really no other way for me to describe this: They want to impose their sexual fantasies on other people, whether it's children or their own employees.

We know that because Fox's executives recommend several books for their employees to read.

Clip 5

One of the books is called "Fairest." It's by Meredith Talusan. Here's a quote from the book, early on.

"I'm sorry but what's a glory hole?” I asked. The chuckles in the room aimed themselves at me. Gavin leaned forward so I could see him. In the half-second before he spoke, I noticed that he was beautiful. A glory hole is an opening drilled into the side of a restroom stall, he said like we were reading out of a dictionary…”

What follows is a graphic description of how a glory hole works. I can’t even share with you what most of this book says — at least, I won’t. This is a book that Fox executives tell their employees will "expand [their] perspective." The author goes on to elaborate in ways that I will not share, but again, it’s all on Twitter if you’d like to read it for yourself.

Clip 6

In case you're tempted to think that Fox executives recommended this book by mistake, you should know they also tell their employees to read a novel called "Red, White and Royal Blue." It's about a fictional gay relationship between the prince of Wales and the president's son. It starts off with this dialogue, which can best be described as barely literate.

"Listen," Alex tells her, "royal weddings are trash, the princes who have royal weddings are trash, the imperialism that allows princes to exist at all is trash. It's trash turtles all the way down." "Is this your Ted Talk?” June asks. "You do realize America is a genocidal empire too right? “Yes June, but at least we have the decency to not keep a monarchy around,” Alex says, throwing a pistachio at her."

Why does Fox encourage its employees to read this horribly written dialogue about how America is a genocidal empire? It's hard to say. The book doesn't linger on that topic very long. Very quickly it also devolves into gay erotica.

"Henry gets a grip on Alex's hips and pulls him close, so Alex is properly straddling his lap, and he kisses hard now …” And it gets much worse from there, but again not anything I want to share.

By the way, Fox also recommends a book for its employees read to their children. It’s an illustrated book starring a unicorn, which is clearly intended to be a symbol for being gay or trans or nonbinary, et cetera.

Clip 8

Fox also tells employees to watch videos of activists, including a Ted Talk in which a woman explains that undergoing a medically unnecessary double mastectomy was a sign of strength. Watch:

Clip 9

What we're seeing is a top-down effort by Fox executives to ensure that radical gender ideology, and all of its deranged excesses, is dominant at every level in the company. But of course, not every Fox employee wants to go along with this. That might be why, last year, Fox experimented with a solution to whip those employees in line. It’s an AI platform called Eskalera, which tracks employees’ commitment to the cult of DEI. Here's how VentureBeat describes Eskalera.

Clip 10

"Eskalera creates AI-based Inclusion Index to measure a better workplace. … Eskalera today unveiled the Inclusion Index, a new system for organizing companies that encourages and quantifies inclusive culture. Using organizational analytics, the Inclusion Index is aimed at real-time measurement of a company’s diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts."

If you check the Eskalera website, and do some reading on what "services" this AI performs, it's truly creepy stuff. Eskalera advertises that it pulls in data from a variety of sources, including company email and payroll systems. It generated a “peer comfort index” and a “diversity index,” based in part on how often employees “practice micro-affirmations.” Those are apparently the opposite of “microaggressions,” and it appears Fox is all about them.

Clip 12

Eskalera produces data that guides company leaders, telling them which departments aren't inclusive enough. The system is supposed to guide hiring, terminations, raises — everything.

What's the end result of all this? What happens to a news organization when the executives promote radical gender ideology and perverted reading materials? What happens when they bring in a woke AI to monitor everyone?

You get the current state of Fox. It's a company where it seems that many of the employees hate Fox News viewers. Here’s the Instagram page of one influential Fox News employee, to give just one example. He has pronouns in bio, of course — he goes by he/him.

Clip 13

In one post, this employee calls conservatives "hicks" for complaining about drag queens who target kids.

Clip 14

In another post, he defends the anti-Catholic hate group "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence." “And Catholics wonder why we have an order of Nuns to push back on this ridiculous garbage," he wrote. To be clear, this Fox News employee is defending a group that openly mocks Catholics, putting on perverted and blasphemous displays like this in public:

Clip 15

There are a bunch more posts that make it clear this employee has contempt for Fox News viewers. It's not worth going through all of them, but there's a clear connection between these posts and the content that Fox News viewers see. Some of his posts are about his work on the Fox News website. He says he was "so happy" Fox News got to use the image he made after Joe Biden won the presidency, for example.

This is all very bad, to put it mildly. And now the question is, where do we go from here? What happens next? Well, in the few hours after we first posted our investigation, several prominent conservatives, as expected, stayed silent and refused to amplify it. These are people who are terrified of losing the opportunity to appear on Fox for a couple of minutes. Terrified of not being able to go on Fox and promote their next book, or their podcast, or whatever. They’d rather lose their integrity than lose that.

But several major figures did speak out, to their great credit. Utah Senator Mike Lee, for example, wrote, “This kind of deliberate alienation of its own audience might not end well for Fox News. But for the fact that there is no other large cable news company in America that is widely known as conservative (or even right of center), this account could prove devastating.”

Scott Adams wrote simply, “My brain is exploding.”

James Lindsey observed that “ESG/CEI likely is behind both this and Tucker's removal at FOX. Fox is now openly known to be part of the ESG cartel.”

Blaze host Steve Deace said “Just read this thread. Complete and total vile filth from Fox News.”

Jeremy's Razors Sale. 30% off

Other commentators — including people who stand to get disinvited from Fox, permanently, for speaking out — spoke out as well. Jason Whitlock, a frequent guest on Fox, publicly thanked us for the investigation.

Benny Johnson wrote, “This is insane. You need to read this. Fox News is a 5th column. A Trojan horse in the city walls.”

Robby Starbuck, another regular on Fox, tweeted, “I will not appear on a Fox News show until they drop their attacks on Tucker and fire the person responsible for this vile memo.” And Chaya Raichik, the founder of Libs of TikTok, wrote, “I visited Fox HQ a few times. On one occasion I noticed a bunch of screensavers with the words "Fox Pride" in rainbow colors. I remember thinking it was very strange. It all makes sense now. Fox needs to get their act together.”

All of these people and more, at some significant personal cost, responded to our investigation. They were willing to call out a wrong when they saw it, regardless of whether it impacted them professionally. Credit to them for that, and now we need many more to speak out. Every conservative is quick to criticize corporate wokeism — and for good reason — but Fox must not be given a pass. Quite the opposite.

So the question is: what do Fox News executives think about all of this? Do they object to their parent company recommending books about pornographic topics to their employees? Fox News’ audience deserves to know.

After I posted yesterday’s tweet thread on our investigation last night, we reached out to Fox News executives about this. We still haven’t heard back. So far, Fox doesn’t seem to think its viewers deserve any kind of explanation whatsoever. That may be more revealing than what we uncovered, frankly.

Why explain this? As we said on Twitter, maybe it’s because Fox doesn’t really care what its viewers think. Fox, like many big tech platforms and major corporations, is primarily owned by enormous institutional investors, particularly Blackrock and Vanguard. These massive funds consolidate the wealth of millions of Americans, and then use their combined power to pursue a radical agenda most of those Americans oppose. They are Fox’s real customers. And they’re getting exactly what they want.








Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
NRO articles on detransitioners
« Reply #438 on: June 22, 2023, 08:13:24 AM »



Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Playing that forward.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile
Playing that forward too.


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile

G M

  • Power User
  • ***
  • Posts: 26643
    • View Profile


Crafty_Dog

  • Administrator
  • Power User
  • *****
  • Posts: 72322
    • View Profile